
r <? 



,^0 o 



o • 



'0' 



4^ . 

-0^ -j^ 



» s " 



3 



^0- 



\0 ' : 



O 



na 



KELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS 



WORLD 



A GENERAL VIEW OP THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND CONDITION OF THE 
VARIOUS SECTS OF CHRISTIANS, THE JEWS, AND MAHOMETANS, AS 
WELL AS THE PAGAN FORMS OF RELIGION EXISTING IN 
THE DIFFERENT COUNTRIES OF THE EARTH: 



FROM THE BEST AUTHORITIES. 

By VINCENT L. ViLNER. 



A NEW AND IMPROVED EDITION, 
WITH AN APPENDIX BROUGHT UP TO THE PRESENT TIME, 
By jr NEWTON BROWN, D. D., 

EDITOR OF "encyclopedia OL' RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE." 



SOLD ONLY BY SUBSCRIPTION. / \ 



PHILADELPHIA: 
BRADLEY, GARRETSON & CO,, 
66 North Fourth Street. 



WILLIAM GARRETSON & CO., 

GALESBUKG, ILL.: COLUMBUS, OHIO: NASHVILLE, TENN. 
HOUSTON, TEXAS: SAN FEANCISCO, CAL. 

1874. 



Entered according to Act'of Congress, in the year 1874, by 

BRADLEY & CO., 
In the OiRce of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. 



PjREFACE. 



The followftig riew of the religious denominations of the world 
has been carefully compiled from the best authorities on the sub- 
ject. In order to render it as complete as the limits of the 
volume would permit, the method has been followed of present- 
ing summaries of the doctrines of each sect or religion without 
in general adducing the arguments by which they are sustained. 
The latter course would have led into too wide a field of contro- 
versy. In order to preserve the degree of impartiality which 
the reader is entitled to expect in a work of this kind, the com- 
piler has confined himself to authorities in which the doctrines 
of the several sects are drawn from the published works of their 
founders or leading writers. 

The subject is full of instruction. It forms a part of the his- 
tory of the human intellect, as it has been exercised in diff"erent 
ages of the world, on topics the most interesting that can possibly 
claim the attention of mankind. In reviewing the various forms 
oi faith and shades of opinion on religion which have prevailed 



iv 



PREFACE. 



m different ages and various parts of the world, we may learn the 
mtiuence of external circumstances on internal belief; and that 
of speculative opinions on the actual condr.ct of life. We per- 
ceive also the first effect of freedom of religious inquiry, in multi 
plying sects and dividing extensive religious organizations into 
numerous branches. Above all, we ma^^ learn from this general 
survey of religious sects, the lesson of charity and forbearance tow- 
ard those who may entertain theological opinions different from 
our own. 

This volume will also show the gratifying truth, that while the 
first effect of religious freedom may be to multiply divisions, its 
final effect is to heal them. Some of the most scandalous divisions 
in all ages have grown out of the attempts of governments, civil 
and ecclesiastical, to stifle freedom of inquiry and suppress its 
manifestations ; and while such despotism continues, no restorative 
process is possible. Whereas, the natural growth of Christian 
feeling under free institutions, tends to bring together bodies long 
divided and alienated, whether in the Old World or in the New. 
This happy effect of perfect religious freedom is most manifest in 
oar own country at the present time. As in the beginning. Chris- 
tians were " of one heart and of one soul," so it may be hoped, 
they will here become, through the unfettered study of the Scrip- 
tures and the influence of the same Spirit which then guided them 
into all truth : for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the 
Lord." Sects will disappear in the overflowing fulness of faith 
and love. Despotism in Church and State may produce hypocriti- 
cal Unifokmity, but perfect religious freedom is the primary condi- 
tion of Christian Unity. 



ALPHABETICAL INDEX. 



PAGE 

ABYSSINIAN CHUKCH 409 

ADAMITES 410 

AFEICAN METHODISTS 106 

AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL ZION CHURCH.... 106 

AGNCETJ^ 452 

ALBANENSES 453 

ALBIGENSES 411 

ANABAPTISTS 400 

ANTI-SABBATARIANS 508 

ANTINOMIANS 403 

ARIANS 282 

ARMENIANS 284 

ARMINIANS 285 

ASSOCIATE PRESBYTERIANS 166 

ASSOCIATE REFORMED 169 

ATHEISTS 508 

BAPTISTS 35 

BASILIDIANS 505 

BAXTERIANS 286 

BEREANS 447 

BRAMINS 530 

BROWNISTS 242 

BUDDHISTS 533 

CALVINISTS 388 

CARMATHITES , 483 

CERINTHIANS 486 

1* V 



vi ALPHABETICAL INDEX. 

PAGE 

CHEISTIANS 200 

CHEISTIANS OF ST. JOHN 506 

CHEISTIANS OF ST. THOMAS 507 

CIECONCELLIONES 501 

COCCEIANS , , 445 

COLLEGIANS 447 

COLOEED METHODIST EPISCOPAL 106 

CONGEEGATIONALISTS 222 

CONGEEGATIONAL METHODISTS 106 

COPHTS 503 

CUMBEELAND PEESBYTEEIANS 174 

DANCEES 444 

DAVIDISTS 444 

DEISTS 472 

DISCIPLES OF CHEIST 181 

DONATISTS 470 

DUTCH EEFOEMED 53 

EBIONITES 468 

ENGLISH PEESBYTEEIANS 120 

EPHEATA BAPTISTS , 195 

EPISCOPALIANS 46 

EEASTIANS 443 

EUCHITES 467 

EUNOMIANS 466 

EUTYCHIANS 374 

SPVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION 105 

EVANGELICAL LUTHEEANS 64 

FIFTH MONAECHY MEN 377 

FLAGELLANTS 396, 

FEATEICELLI 378 1 

FEEE CHUECH OF SCOTLAND 115 

FEEE-WILL BAPTISTS 180 

FEEE METHODIST CHUECH....;..;....^:.;;;.; 107 

FEENCH PEOPHETS ...v2. 499 

FEIENDS 267 



ALPHABETICAL INDEX. vii 

PAGE 

GALILEANS 488 

GEEMAN EEFOEMED CHUECH 58 

GNOSTICS 300 

GEEEK CHUECH 322 

GUEBEES 511 

HATTEMISTS 465 

HOPKINSIANS 437 

HUGUENOTS 260 

HUSSITES 304 

HUTCHINSONIANS 307 

ICONOCLASTES 312 

INDEPENDENTS 245 

INGHAMITESc , 464 

JACOBITES 494 

JANSENISTS 495 

JESUITS 428 

JEWS 355 

JUMPEES 404 

KIEK OF SCOTLAND 110 

LABATISTS 405 

LAMAISTS 527 

LATITUDINAEIANS 454 

LIBEETINES 462 

LOLLAEDS 426 

LUCIANISTS 486 

LUCIFEEIANS 487 

MAHOMETANISM 326 

MANICHJ5ANS 380 

MAECIONITES 384 

MAEONITES 385 

MATEEIALISTS 489 

MELCHITES 485 

MENNONITES 196 

METHODISTS 79 

METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHUECH 98 



viii AliPHABETICAL INDEX. 

PAGE 

METHODIST PROTESTANTS 104 

METHODIST SOCIETY 103 

MINOE DENOMINATIONS OF BAPTISTS 191 

MOLINISTS 392 

MONOPHYSITES..: 481 

MONOTHELITES 483 

MONTANISTS 394 

MORAVIANS 178 

MORMONS - 234 

MUGGLETONIANS 395 

MYSTICS 406 

NECESSARIANS 423 

NEONOMIANS 253 

NESTORIANS 512 

NONCONFORMISTS 256 

ORIOENISTS 455 

PAGANS 517 

PAGANS OF AFRICA 536 

PAGANS OF CHINA 519 

PAGANS OF JAPAN 522 

PAGANS OF LAPLAND 557 

PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR 540 

PAGANS OF MEXICO 563 

PAGANS OF NORTH AMERICA 559 

PAGANS OF PERU 569 

PAGANS OF POLYNESIA 552 

PANTHEISTS 413 

PAULICIANS 400 

PAULIANISTS 459 

PELAGIANS 373 

PETROBRUSSIANS ^ 458 

PIETISTS.... ! S. 380 

PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA 121 

PBIMITIVE METI-IODISTS 106 

PURITANS 239 



ALPHABETICAL INDEX. ix 

PAGE 

EEFOEMED METHODISTS 103 

EEFORMED PEESBYTEEIANS 160 

EELLYANISTS 479 

EOMAN CATHOLICS 571 

SABELLIANS 488 

SADDUCEES 484 

SAMAEITANS 484 

SANDEMANIANS 419 

SEVENTH-DAY BAPTISTS 191 

SHAKEES 290 

SIX-PEINCIPLE BAPTISTS 205 

SOCINIANS 417 

SOUTHEEN PEESBYTEEIAN CHUECH 141 

SECOND ADVENTISTS 414 

SPIEITUALISTS 587 

SUBLAPSAEIANS 475 

SUPEALAPSAEIANS 476 

SWEDENBOEGIANS 213 

THE CHUECH OF GOD 205 

THE CHEISTIAN UNION CPIUECPIES 203 

TPIEOPHILANTHEOPISTS 297 

TUNKEES 198 

UNITAEIANS 207 

UNITED BEETHEEN IN CHEIST 871 

UNITED PEESBYTEEIAN CtlUECH OF SCOTLAND... 118 

UNITED PEESBYTEEIANS 172 

UNIVEESALISTS 209 

WALDENSES 318 

WICKLIFFITES 316 

WESLEYAN METHODISTS 105 

WELSH CALYINISTIC METHODISTS 106 

WILKINSONIANS 317 



ALPHABETICAL INDEX. 

IK"DEX TO APPEN'DIX. 



PAGE 

ANABAPTISTS 605 

AKMENIANS 600 

BAPTISTS 621 

BEAMmS: BUDDHISTS 609 

BEETHEEN OE PLYMOUTH BEETHEEN 594 

CHEISTIANS 600 

CHEISTIANIT Y 622 

CHEISTADELPHIANS : 595 

GNOSTICS 600 

GEEEK CHUECI-I 604 

LOLLAEDS... 608 

MANICHJ3ANS 604 

MONOPHYSITES 609 

PAGANS 609 

PAGANS OF AFEICA 610 

PAGANS OF AMEEICA 610 

PAGANS OF CHINA , 609 

PAGANS OF JAPAN 610 

PAGANS OF MADAGASCAE 610 

PAGANS OF POLYNESIA 610 

PAULICIANS 609 

PETEOBEUSSIANS 608 

PEOGEESSIVE FEIENDS 600 

EATIONALISTS 600 

WALDENSES 611 

WICKLIFFITES 602 



INTRODUCTION. 



SECTION 1. 

STATE OP THE WORLD IN GENERAL, AT THE BIRTH OF 
JESUS CHRIST. 

When Jesus Christ made bis appearance on eartli, a great 
part of the world was subject to the Roman Empire. This 
empire was much the largest temporal monarchy that had ever 
existed, so that it was called all the world (Luke ii. 1). The 
time when the Romans first subjugated the land of Judea, was 
between sixty and seventy years before Christ was born; and 
soon after this the Roman Empire rose to its greatest extent and 
splendor. To this government the world continued subject till 
Christ came, and many hundred years afterwards. The remoter 
nations, that had submitted to the yoke of this mighty empire, 
were ruled either by Roman governors, invested with temporary 
commissions, or by their own princes and laws, in subordination 
to the republic, whose sovereignty was acknowledged, and to 
which the conquered kings, who wsre continued in their own 
dominions, owed their borrowed majesty. At the same time, the 
Roman people, and their venerable Senate, though they had not 
lost all shadow of liberty, were yet in reality reduced to a state 
of servile submission to Augustus Caesar, who, by artifice, per- 
fidy, and bloodshed, attained an enormous degree of power, and 

(xi) 



Xll 



INTRODUCTION. 



"united in his own person the pompous titles of Emperor, Port- 
- ^^ffy Censor, Tribune of the People ; in a word, all the great 
offces of the State. 

At this period, the Romans, according to DanieFs prophetic 
<^er,cription, had trodden down the kingdoms, and by their ex 
e^^eding strength devoured the whole earth. However, by en- 
graving the world, they civilized it; and whilst they oppressed 
riankind, they united them together. The same laws were 
everywhere established, and the same languages understood 
Men approached nearer to one another in sentiments and man- 
ners ; and the intercourse between the most distant regions of 
the earth was rendered secure and agreeable. Hence, the benign 
influence of letters and philosophy was spread abroad in coun- 
tries which had been before enveloped in the darkest ignorance. 

Just before Christ was born, the Roman empire not only rose . 
to ifs greatest height, but was also settled in peace. Augustus 
Caesar had been for many years establishing the state of the 
Roman Empire, and subduing his enemies, till the very year 
that Christ was born : then, all his enemies being reduced to 
subjection, his dominion over the world appeared to be settled 
in its greatest glory. This remarkable peace, after so many ages 
of tumult and war, was a fit prelude to the ushering of the 
glorious Prince of Peace into the world. The tranquillity which 
then reigned was necessary to enable the ministars of Christ to 
execute with success their sublime commission to the human 
face. In the situation into which the providence of Grod had 
brought the world, the gospel in a few years reached those remote 
corners of the earth into which it could not otherwise have pen-j* 
trated for many ages. 

All the heathen nations, at the time of Christ's appearance 
on earth, worshipped a multiplicity of gods and demons, whose 
favor they courted by obscene .and ridiculous cerem.onies, and 
whose anger they endeavored to appease by the most abominable 
cruelties. 

Every nation had its respective gods, over which one, more 
excellent than the rest, presided; yet in such a manner, that the 
supreme deity way himself controlled by the rigid decrees of 



IKTRODUCTION. 



xiij 



fate, or by what the philosophers called eternal necessity. The 
gods of the East were different from those of the Gauls, the 
Germans, and other northern nations. The Grecian divinities 
differed from those of the Egyptians, who deified plants, and a 
great variety of the productions both of nature and art. Each 
people had also their peculiar manner of worshipping and ap- 
peasing its respective deities In process of time, however, the 
Greeks and Romans grew as ambitious in their religious preten- 
sions, as in their political claims. They maintained that their 
gods, though under different appellations, were the objects of 
religious worship in all nations; and therefore they gave the 
names of their deities to those of other countries. 

The deities of almost all nations were either ancient heroes, 
renowned for noble exploits and worthy deeds, or kings and 
generals, who had founded empires, or women who had become 
illustrious by remarkable actions or useful inventions. The merit 
of those eminent persons, contemplated by their posterity with 
enthusiastic gratitude, was the cause of their exaltation to celes- 
tial honors. The natural world furnished another kind of dei- 
ties; and as the sun, moon, and stars shine with a lustre superior 
to that of all other material beings, they received religious homage 
from almost all the nations of the world. 

From those beings of a nobler kind, idolatry descended into 
an enormous multiplication of inferior powers ; so that, in many 
countries, mountains, trees, jind rivers, the earth, the sea, and 
wind, nay, even virtues, and vices, and diseases, had their shrines 
attended by devout and zealous worshippers. 

These deities were honored with rites and sacrifices of various 
kinds, according to their respective nature and offices. Most 
nations offered animals, and human sacrifices were universal in 
ancient times. They were in use among the Egyptians till the 
reign of Amasis. They were never so common among the Greeks 
and Romans ; yet they were practised by them on extraordinary 
occasions. Porphyry says " that the Greeks were wont to sacri- 
fice men when they went to war." He relates, also, "that human 
sacrifices were offered at Rome till the reign of Adrian, who or- 
dered them to be abolished in most places.'' 
2 



INTRODUCTIO Ifr. 



Pontiffs, priests, and ministers, distributed into several classes, 
presided over the Pagan worship, and were appointed to prevent 
disorder in the performance of religious rites. The sacerdotal 
order, which was supposed to be distinguished by an immediate 
intercourse and friendship with the gods, abused its authority 
in the basest manner, to deceive an ignorant and wretched 
people. 

The religious worship of the Pagans was confined to certain 
times and places. The statues, and other representations of the 
gods, were placed in the temples, and supposed to be animated 
in an incomprehensible manner — for they carefully avoided the 
imputation of worshipping inanimate beings — and therefore pre- 
tended that the divinity, represented by the statue, was really 
present in it, if the dedication was truly and properly made. 

Besides the public worship of the gods, to which all, without 
exception, were admitted, there were certain religious rites cele- 
brated in secret by the Greeks, and several eastern countries, to 
which a small number was allowed access. These were called 
mysteries ; and persons who desired an initiation, were obliged 
previously to exhibit satisfactory proofs of their fidelity and 
patience, by passing through various trials and ceremonies of the 
most disagreeable kind. The secret of these mysteries was kept 
in the strictest manner, as the initiated could not reveal anything 
that passed in them, without exposing their lives to the most 
imminent danger. 

These secret doctrines were taught in the mysteries of Eleusis, 
and in those of Bacchus and other divinities. But the reigning: 
religion was totally external. It held out no body of doctrines, 
no public instruction to participate on stated days in the esta- 
blished worship. The only faith required, was to believe that 
the gods exist, and reward virtue, either in this life or in that 
to come ; the only practice, to perform at intervals some religious 
acts, such as appearing in the solemn festivals, and sacrificing at 
the public altars 

The spirit and genius of the Pagan religion was not calculated 
to promote moral virtue. Stately temples, expensive sacrifices, 
pompous ceremonies, and magnificent festivals, were the objects 



INTRODUCTION. 



XV 



presented to its votaries. But just notions of G-od, obedience 
to His moral laws, purity of lieart, and sanctity of life, were not 
once mentioned as ingredients in religious service. No repent- 
ance of past crimes, and no future amendment of conduct, were 
ever prescribed by tbe Pagans, as proper means of appeasing 
tiieir offended deities. Sacrifice a chosen victim, bow down 
before an hallowed image, be initiated in the sacred mysteries, — 
and the wrath of the gods shall be averted, and the thunder shall 
drop from their hands. 

The gods and goddesses, to whom public worship was paid, 
exhibited to their adorers examples of egregious crimes, rathei 
than of useful and illustrious virtues. It was permitted to con- 
sider Jupiter, the father of the gods, as an usurper, who expelled 
his father from the throne of the universe, and is, in his turii, 
to be one day driven from it by his son. The priests were little 
solicitous to animate the people to virtuous conduct, either by 
precept or example. They plainly enough declared, that all 
which was essential to the true worship of the gods, was con- 
tained in the rites and institutions which the people had received 
by tradition from their ancestors. Hence the wiser part of man- 
kind, about the time of Christ's birth, looked upon the whole 
system of religion as a just object of ridicule and contempt. 

The consequence of this state of theology was an universal 
corruption of manners, which discovered itself m the impunity 
of the most flagitious crimes. 

When the Eomans had subdued the world, they lost their own 
liberty. Many vices, engendered or nourished by prosperity^ 
delivered them over to the vilest of tyrants that ever afflicted oi 
disgraced human nature. Despotic power was accompanied with 
all the odious vices which are usually found in its train, and they 
rapidly grew to an incredible pitch. The colors are not too 
strong which the apostle employs in drawing the character of 
that age, in Eom. i. 21, 22, etc., and in Eph. iv. 17-19. 

At the time of Christ^s appearance on earth, the religion of 
the Eomans, as well as their arms, had extended itself through- 
out a great part of ihe world. Besides the religious rites, which 



XYl INTRODUCTION. 

Numa and others had instituted for political views, the R(»Tiian8 
added several Italian and Etrurian fictions to the Grrecian 
fables, and gave also to the Egyptian deities a place among their 
own. 

In the provinces subjected to the Eoman government, there 
arose a new kind of religion, formed by a mixture of the ancient 
lites of the conquered nations with those of the Romans. Those 
nations, who, before their subjection, had their own gods, and 
their own particular religious institutions, were persuaded by 
degrees to admit into their worship a great variety of the sacred 
rites and customs of the conquerors. 

When, from the sacred rites of the ancient Romans, we pass 
to review the other religions which prevailed in the world, it 
will appear obvious, that, the most remarkable may be properly 
divided into two classes — one of which will comprehend the 
religious systems which owe their existence to political views j 
and the other, of those which seem to have been formed for 
military purposes. The religion of most of the eastern nations 
may be ranked in the former class, especially that of the Per- 
sians, Egyptians, and Indians, which appears to have been solely 
calculated for the preservation of the State, the support of the 
royal authority and grandeur, the maintenance of public peace, 
and the advancement of civil virtues. The religious system of 
the northern nations may be comprehended under the military 
class ; since all the traditions among the Germans, thf^ Bretons, 
the Celts, and the Goths, concerning their divinities, have a 
manifest tendency to excite and nourish fortitude, ferocity, an 
insensibility of dangej, and contempt of life. 

At this time Christianity broke forth from the east like .a 
rising sun, and dispelled the universal religious darkness which 
obscured every part of the globe. " The noblest people," says 
Dr. Robertson, that ever entered upon the stage of the world 
r^ppear to have been only instruments in the Divine Hand, for 
the execution of wise purposes concealed from themselves. The 
Roman ambition and bravery paved the way, and prepared the 
world, -for the reception of the Christian doctrine. They fought 
and conquered, that it might triumph with the greater ease (se-' 



INTKODUCTION. 



XVll 



Isaiah x. 7). By means of their victories, the overruling pro- 
vidence of God established an empire, which really possesses 
that perpetuity and eternal duration which they vainly arrogated 
ko their own. He erected a throne which shall continue foiever, 
4nd of the " increase of that government there shall he no end/' 
it has been mentioned to the honor of Christianity, that it 
jose and flourished in a learned, inquiring, and discerning age ; 
and made the most rapid and amazing progress through the im- 
mense empire of Rome, to its remotest limits, when the world 
was in its most civilized state, and in an age that was universally 
distinguished for science and erudition. 



SECTION 11. 

STATE OF THE JEWISH NATION AT THE BIRTH OF JESUS CHRIST 

The state of the Jews was not much better than that of other 
nations, at the time of Christ's appearance on earth. They were 
governed by Herod, who was himself tributary to the Roman 
people. His government was of the most vexatious and oppres- 
sive kind. By a cruel, suspicious, and overbearing temper, he 
drew upon himself the aversion of all, not excepting those who 
lived upon his bounty. 

Under his administration, and through his influence, the 
luxury of the Romans was introduced into Palestine, accompa- 
nied with the vices of that licentious people. In a word, Judea,- 
governed by Herod, groaned under all the corruption which 
"light be expected from the authority and example of a princt 
who, though a Jew in outward profession, was, in point of 
morals and practice, a contemner of all laws, human and divine. 

After the death of this tyrant, the Romans divided the go- 
vernment of Judea between his -sons. In this division, one- 
half the kingdom was given to Archelaus, under the title of 
Exarch. Archelaus was so corrupt and wicked a prince, that at 
last both Jews and Sanaaritans joined in a petition against him 
2* p 



INTKODUCTION. 



to Augustus, who banisbed him from liis doniinicnSj about ten 
years after the death of Herod the Grreat. Judea was by this 
sentence reduced to a Roman province, and ordered to be taxed. 

The governors whom the Romans appointed over Judea, wer^ 
frequently changed, but seldom for the better. About the six- 
teenth year of Christ, Pontius Pilate was appointed governorj 
the whole of whose administration^ according to Josephus, was 
one continual scene of venality, rapine, and of every kind of 
ravage cruelty. Such a governor was ill calculated to appease 
the fernicnts occasioned by the late tax. Indeed, Pilate was so 
far from attempting to appease, that he greatly inflamed them, 
by taking every occasion of introducing his standards, with 
images, pictures, and consecrated shields, into their city; and at 
last by attempting to drain the treasury of the temple, under 
pretence of bringing an aqueduct into Jerusalem. The most 
remarkable transaction of his government, however, was his con- 
demnation of Jesus Christ; seven years after which he was 
removed from Judea. 

However severe was the authority which the Romans exercised 
over the Jews, yet it did not extend to the entire suppression of 
their civil and religious privileges. The Jews were, in some 
measure, governed by their own laws, and permitted the enjoy- 
ment of their religion. The administration of religious ceremo- 
nies was committed, as before, to the high priest, and to the 
Sanhedrim ; to the former of whom the order of priests and 
Levites was in the usual subordination; and the form of outward 
worship, except in a very few points, had suffered no visible 
change. But, on the other hand, it is impossible to express the 
disquietude and disgust, the calamities and vexations, which this 
unhappy nation suiiered from the presence of the Romans, whom 
their reHgion obliged them to regard as a polluted and idolatrous 
people; in a particular manner, from the avarice and cruelty of 
the praetors, and the frauds and extortions of the pubHcans. So 
that, all things considered, their condition, who lived under the 
government of the other sons of Herod, was much more sup- 
portable than the state of those who were immediately subject 
to the Roman jurisdiction. 



INTRODUCTION. 



ZIX 



It WQS not, however, from the Eomans only, that the calami- 
tie, of this miserable people proceeded. Their own rulers mul- 
tiplied their vexations, and debarred them from enjoying any 
'ittle comforts, which were left them by the Roman magistrates. 
The leaders of the people, and the chief priests, were, according 
to the account of Josephus, profligate wretches, who had pur- 
chased their places by bribes, or by other acts of iniquity, and 
who maintained their ill-acquired authority by the most abomi- 
nable crimes. The inferior priests, and those who possessed any 
shadow of authority, were become dissolute and abandoned to 
the highest degree. The multitude, excited by these corrupt 
examples, ran headlong into every kind of iniquity ; and by their 
endless seditions, robberies, and extortions, armed against them- 
selves both the justice of Grod and vengeance of man. 

About the time of Christ's appearance, the Jews of that age 
concluded the period pre-determined by God to be then jom- 
picted, and that the promised Messiah would suddenly appear. 
Devout persons waited day and night for the consolation of Israel; 
and the whole nation, groaning under the Roman yoke, and 
stimulated by the desire of liberty or of vengeance, expected 
their deliverer with the most anxious impatience. 

Nor were these expectations peculiar to the Jews. By theii 
dispersion among so many nations; by their conversation with 
the learned men among the heathens; and by the translations 
of their inspired writings into a language almost universal, the 
principles of their religion were spread all over the East. It 
became the common belief, that a Prince would arise at that 
time in Judea, who would change the face of the world, and 
extend his ..anpire from one end of the earth to the other. 

Two religions flourished at this time in Palestine ; the Jewish 
and Samaritan. The Samaritans blended the errors of Paganism 
with the doctrines of the Jews. The whole body of the people 
looked for a powerful and warlike deliverer, who, they supposed, 
would free them from the Roman authority. All considered the 
whole of religion as consisting in the rites appointed by MosCvS, 
and in the performance of some external acts of duty All were 



INTRODUCTION. 



unanimous in excluding the other nations of the world from th« 
hopes of eternal life. 

The learned among the Jews were divided into a great variety 
of sects. The Pharisees^ the Sadducees^ and Essenes^ eclipsed 
the other denominations. 

The most celebrated of the Jewish sects was that of the 
Pharisees. It is supposed by some, that this denomination sub- 
sisted about a century and a half before the appearance of our 
Saviour. They separated themselves not only from Pagans, but 
from all such Jews as complied not with their peculiarities 
Their separation consisted chiefly in certain distinctions respect- 
ing food and religious ceremonies. It does not appear to have 
interrupted the uniformity of religious worship, in which the 
Jews of every sect seem to have always united. 

This denomination, by their apparent sanctity of manners, had 
rendered themselves extremely popular. The multitude, for the 
most part, espoused their interests; and the great, who feared 
their artifice, were frequently obliged to court their favor. 
Flence they obtained the highest offices both in the State and 
priesthood, and had great weight both in public and private 
affairs. It appears from the frequent mention which is made by 
the evangelists of the Scribes and Pharisees in conjunction, that 
the greatest number of Jewish teachers or doctors of the law, 
(for those were expressions equivalent to scribe) were, at that 
time, of the Pharisaical sect. 

The principal doctrines of the Pharisees are as follows : That 
the oral law, which they suppose Glod delivered to Moses by an 
archangel on Mount Sinai, and which is preserved by tradition, 
is of equal authority, with the written law : That, by observing 
both these laws, a man may not only obtain justification with 
G-od, but perform meritorious works of supererogation : That 
fasting, alms-giving, ablutions, and confessions, are sufficient 
atonements for sin : That thoughts and desires are not sinful,^ 
unless they are carried into action. This denomination acknow- 
ledged the immortality of the soul, future rewards and punish- 
ments, the existence of good and evil angels, and the resurrec 
tio\ of the body. They maintained both the freedom of th 



INTRODUCTION. 



xxi 



will and absolute predestination^ and adopted the Pjthagoreau 
doctrine of the transmigration of souls, excepting the notoriously 
wicked, whom they supposed consigned to eternal punishment. 

The peculiar manners of this sect are strongly marked in the 
writings of the evangelists, and confirmed by the testimony of 
th3 Jewish authors. They fasted the second and fifth day of (he 
week, and put thorns at the bottom of their robes, that they 
might prick their legs as they walked. They lay upon boards 
covered with flint stones, and tied thick cords about their waists. 
They paid tithes as the law prescribed, and gave the thirtieth 
and fiftieth part of their fruits, adding voluntary sacrifices to 
those which were commanded. They were very exact in per- 
formino; their vows. The Talmudic books mention several 
distinct classes of Pharisees; among whom were the Truncated 
Pharisee, who, that he might appear in profound meditation, as 
if destitute of feet, scarcely lifted them from the ground; and 
the Mortar Pharisee, who, that his contemplations might not be 
disturbc'.], wore a deep cap in the shape of a mortar, which 
would only permit him to look upon the ground at his feet 
Such expedients were used by this denomination to captivate the 
admiration of the vulgar; and under the appearance of singular 
piety, they disguised the most licentious manners. 

The sect of the Sadducees derived its origin and name from 
one Sadoc, who flourished in the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus, 
about two hundred and sixty-three years before Christ. The 
chief heads of the Sadducean doctrine are as follows : All laws 
and traditions, not comprehended in the written law, are to be 
rejected as merely human inventions. Neither angels nor spirits 
have a distinct existence, separate from their corporeal vestment. 
The soul of man, therefore, expires with the body. There will 
be no resurrection of the dead, nor rewards and punishments 
after this life. Man is not subject to irresistible fate, but has 
the framing of his condition chiefly in his power. Polygamy 
ought to be practised. 

The practices of the Pharisees and Sadducees were both per- 
fectly suitable to their sentiments. The former were notorious 
hypocrites; ^'i? latter, scandalous libertines. 



INTRODUCTION, 



Tlie Essenes were a Jewish sect. Some suppose they took 
their rise from that dispersion of their nation, which took place 
after the Babylonian captivity. They maintained that rewards 
and punishments extended to the soul alone, and considered the 
body as a mass of malignant matter, and the prison of the immor. 
tal spirit. The greatest part of. this sect considered the laws of 
Moses as an allegorical system of spiritual and mysterious truth, 
and renounced all regard to the outward letter in its explanation. 
The leading traits in the character of this sect were, that they 
were sober, abstemious, peaceable lovers of retirement, and had 
a perfect community of goods. They paid the highest regard 
to the moral precepts of the law, but neglected the ceremonial 
excepting what regarded personal cleanliness, the observation of 
the Sabbath, and making an annual present to the temple at 
Jerusalem. They commonly lived in a state of celibacy, and 
adopted the children of others, to educate them in their own 
principles and customs. Though they were, in general, averse 
to swearing, or to requiring an oath, they bound all whom tlioy 
initiated by the most sacred vows, to observe the duties of piety, 
justice, fidelity, and modesty; to conceal the secrets of the fra- 
ternity; to preserve the books of their instructors; and with 
great care to commemorate the names of the angels. 

Philo mentions two classes of Essenes ; one of which followed 
a practical institution. The other professed a theoretical institu 
tion. The latter, who were called Theraputae, placed their whole 
felicity in the contemplation of the Divine nature. Detaching 
themselves entirely from secular affairs, they transferred their 
property to their relations and friends, and retired to solitary 
places, where they devoted themselves to an holy life. The 
principal society of this kind was formed- near Alexandria, where 
they lived, not far from each other, in separate cottages, each of 
which had its own sacred apartments, to which the inhabitants 
retired for the purposes of devotion. 

Besides these eminent Jewish sects, there were several of 
inferior note, at the time of Christ's appearance : the Herodians, 
c:ientioned by the sacred writers ; and the Gaulonites, by 
/osephus. 



INTE, ODUCTION. 



XXIU 



The Herodians derived their name from Herod the Great. 
Their distinguishing tenet appears to be, that it is lawful, when 
constrained by superiors, to comply with idolatry and with a 
false religion. Herod seems to have formed this sect on purpose 
to j'istify himself in this practice, v/ho, being an Idumean by 
r.ation, was indeed half a Jew and half a Pagan. He, during 
his long reign, studied every artifice to ingratiate himself with 
the emperor, and to secure the favor of the principal personages 
in the court of Rome. Josephus informs us, that his ambition, 
and his entire devotion to Csesar and his court, induced him to 
depart from the usages of his country, and, in many instances, 
to violate its institutions. He built temples in the Greek taste, 
and erected statues for idolatrous worship, apologizing to the 
Jews that he was absolutely necessitated to this conduct by the 
superior powers. We find the Sadducees, who denied a future 
state, readily embraced the tenets of this party : for the same 
persons, who, in one of the gospels, are called Herodians, are, in, 
another called Sadducees. 

The Gaulonites were Galileans, who derived their name from 
one Judas Theudas, a native of Gaulon in Upper Galilee, who, 
in the tenth year of Jesus Christ, excited his countrymen, the 
Galileans, and many other Jews, to take arms, and venture upon 
all extremities, rather than pay tribute to the Romans. The 
prin<jiples he instilled into his party were, not only that they 
wero a free nation, and ought not to be in subjection to any 
other; but that they were the elect of God; that he alone was 
theif governor; and that, therefore, they ought not to submit to 
any ordinance of man. Though Theudas was unsuccessful, and 
hia party, in their very first attempt, entirely routed and dis- 
p<jrrt>ed, yet, so deeply had he infused his own enthusiasm into 
their hearts, that they never rested, till in their own destruction, 
Ihey involved the city and temple. 

Many of the Jews were attached to the oriental philosophy 
coDsjerning the origin of the world. From this source the doc- 
trine of the Cabala is supposed to be derived. That considerable 
numbers of the Jews had imbibed this system, appears evident 
botfi from the books of the New Testament, and from the ancient 



XXIV 



INTRODUCTION. 



history of the Christian church. It is also certain that many of 
the Gnostic sects were founded by Jews. 

Whilst the learned and sensible part of the Jewish nation waa 
divided into a variety of sects, the multitude was sunk into the 
most deplorable ignorance of religion, and had no conception of 
any other method of rendering themselves acceptable to Grod 
than by sacrifices, washings, and other external rites and cere- 
monies of the Mosaic law. Hence proceeded that dissolutenesa 
of manners which prevailed among the Jews during Christ's 
ministry on earth. Hence also the divine Saviour compares the 
people to sheep without a shepherd, and their doctors to men 
who, though deprived of sight, yet pretended to show the waj 
to others. 

In taking a view of the corruptions both in doctrine and prac- 
tice, which prevailed among the Jews at the time of Christ's 
appearance, we find that the external worship of Grod was dis- 
figured by human inventions. Many learned men have observed 
that a great variety of rites was introduced into the service of th( 
temple, of which no traces are to be found in the sacred writings 
This was owing to those revolutions, which rendered the Jem 
more conversant than they had formerly been, with the neigh- 
boring nations. They were pleased with several of the ceremoniej, 
which the Grreeks and Romans used in the worship of the Pa^^an 
deities, and did not hesitate to adopt them in the service of the 
true God, and add them as an ornament to the rites, which they 
had received by divine appointment. 

The Jews multiplied so prodigiously, that the narrow boundis 
of Palestine were no longer sufficient to contain them. The^ 
poured, therefore, their increasing numbers into the neighboring 
countries with such rapidity, that, at the time of Christ's birth, 
there was scarcely a province in the empire where they were not 
found carrying on commerce and exercising other lucrative arts. 
They were defended in foreign countries against injurious treat 
ment by the special edicts of the magistrates. This was abso- 
lutely necessary ; since, in most places, the remarkable difference 
of their religion and manners from those of other nations, ex 
posed them to the hatred and indignation of the ignorant and 



INTRODUCTION. 



bigoted multitude. " All this/' says Dr. Mosheim, " appears to 
have been most singularly and wisely directed by tlie adorable 
hand of an interposing Providence, to the end, that this people, 
wtich was the sole depository of the true religion, and of the 
knowledge of one supreme God, being spread abroad through the 
whole earth, might be everywhere, by their example, a reproach 
to superstition, contribute in some measure to check it, and thus 
prepare the way for that yet fuller discovery of divine truth, 
which was to shine upon the world from the ministry and gospel 
of the Son of God." 



SECTION III. 

AN ACCOUNT OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEMS WHICH WEllE 
IN VOGUE AT THE TIME OF CHRIST'S APPEARANCE. 

At the important era of Christ's appearance in the world, two 
kinds of philosophy prevailed among the civilized nations. One 
was the philosophy of the Greeks, adopted also by the Romans ; 
and the other, that of the Orientals, which had a great number 
of votaries in Persia, Syria, Chaldea, Egypt, and even among 
the Jews. The former was distinguished by the simple title of 
philosophy/. The latter was honored by the more pompous 
appellation of science or knowledge ; since those who adhered tc 
the latter sect pretended to be the restorers of the knowledge of 
God, which was lost in the world. The followers of both these 
systems, in consequence of vehement disputes and dissensions 
about several points, subdivided themselves into a variety of sects. 
It is, however, to be observed, that all the sects of the Oriental 
philosophy deduced their various tenets from one fundamental 
principle, which they held in common ; but the Greeks were 
much divided about the first principles of science. 

Amongst the Grecian sects there were some who declaimed 
openly against religion, and denied the immortality of the soul ; 
and others, who acknowledged a Deity, and a state of future 
rewards and punishments. Of the former kind were the Epi 
cureans and Academics ; of the latter, the Platonists and Stoics 



KX7i 1 N T E D U C T I tT. 

The Epicureans derived tlieir name from Epicurus^ who was 
born in the hundred and ninth olympiad, 242 years before Christ. 
He accounted for the formation of the world in the following 
manner : A finite number of that infinite multitude of atoms^ 
which, with infinite space, constitutes the universe, falling for- 
tnitously into the region of the world, were, in consequence of 
their innate motion, collected into one rude and indigested mass 
All the various parts of nature were formed by those atoms, 
which were best fitted to produce them. The fiery particles 
formed themselves into air; and from those which subsided, the 
earth was produced. The mind or intellect was formed of par- 
ticles most subtle in their nature, and capable of the most rapid 
motion. The world is preserved by the same mechanical causes 
by which it was framed ; and from the same causes it will at last 
le dissolved. 

Epicurus admitted that there were in the universe divino 
natures. I3ut he asserted that these happy and divine beings 
did not encumber themselves with the government of the world : 
yet, on account of their excellent nature, they are proper objects 
of reverence and worship. 

The science of physics was, in the judgment of Epicurus, 
subordinate to that of ethics; and his whole doctrine concerning 
nature was professedly adapted to rescue men from the dominion 
of troublesome passions, and lay the foundation of a tranquil and 
happy life. He taught, that man is to do everything for his own 
sake ; that he is to make his own happiness his chief end, and 
do all in his power to secure and preserve it. He considered 
pleasure as the ultimate good of mankind; but asserts that he 
does not mean the pleasures of the luxurious, but principally the 
freedom of the body from pain, and of the mind from anguish 
and perturbation. The virtue he prescribes is resolved ultimate !y 
into our private advantage without regard to the excellence of 
its own nature, or of its being commanded by the Supreme Being. 

The followers of Aristotle were another famous Grecian sect. 
That philosopher was born in the first year of the ninety-ninth 
olympiad, about 384 years before the birth of Christ. 

Aristotle supposed the universe to have existed from eternity 



INTRODUCTION 



XXVll 



lie admitted, however, the existence of a deity, whom he styled 
the Jirsf mover, and whose nature, as explained by him, is some- 
thing like the principle which gives motion to a machine. It is 
a nature wholly separated from matter, immutable, and far 
Buperior to all other intelligent natures. The celestial sphere, 
which, is the region of his residence, is also immutable; and 
residing in his first sphere, he possesses neither immensity nor 
omnipresence. Happy in the contemplation of himself, he is 
entirely regardless of human affairs. In producing motion, the 
deity acts not voluntarily, but necessarily ; not for the sake of 
other beings, but for his own pleasure. 

Nothing occurs in the writings of Aristotle which decisively 
determines whether he supposed the soul of inan mortal or 
immortal. 

Respecting ethics, he taught that happiness consisted in the 
Tirtuous exercise of the mind, and that virtue consists in pre- 
serving that mean in all things which reason and prudence 
describe. It is the middle path between two extremes, one of 
which is vicious through excess, the other through defect. 

The Stoics were a sect of heathen philosophers, of which Zeno, 
who flourished about 350 years before Christ, was the original 
founder. They received their denomination from a place in 
which Zeno delivered his lectures, which was a portico at Athens. 
Their distinguishing tenets were as follows : That God is unde- 
rived, incorruptible, and eternal ; possessed of intelligence and 
goodness ; the efficient cause of all the qualities and forms of 
things ; and the constant preserver and governor of the world. 
That matter is also underived and eternal, and by the powerful 
energy of the Deity impressed with motion and form : That 
though God and matter subsisted from eternity, the present 
regular frame of nature had a beginning, and tVill have an end 
That the element of fire will at last, by an universal conflagration, 
reduce the world to its pristine state. That at this period all 
material forms are lost in one chaotic mass, all animated nature ia 
reunited to the Deity, and matter returns to its original form. 
That from this chaotic state, however, it again emerges, by the 
energy of the efficient principle j and gods and men, and all 



xxviii 



INTKODUCTION, 



forms of regulated nature, are renewed, to be dissolved and 
renewed in endless succession. That at tlie restoration of all 
things, the race of men will return to life. Some imagined that 
each individual would return to its former body ; while others 
supposed that after the revolution of the great year, similar soub 
would be placed in similar bodies. 

Those among the Stoics who maintained the existence of thf. 
soul after death, supposed it to be removed into the celestial 
regions of the gods, where it remains, till, at the general confla- 
gration, all souls, both human and divine, shall be absorbed in 
the Deity. But many imagined, that before they were admitted 
among the divinities, they must purge away their inherent vices 
and imperfections by a temporary residence in the asrial regions 
between the earth and the moon, or in the moon itself. It was 
supposed that depraved and ignoble souls are agitated after death 
in the lower region of the air till the fiery parts are separated 
from the grosser, and rise, by their natural levity, to the orbit 
of the moon, where they are still further purified and refined. 

According to the doctrine of the Stoics, all things are subject 
to an irresistible and irreversible fatality : and there is a necessary 
chain of causes and efi"ects, arising from the action of a power, 
which is itself a part of the machine it regulates, and which, 
equally with the machine, is subject to the immutable laws of 
necessity. 

The moral doctrine of the Stoics depends upon the preceding 
principles. They make virtue to consist in an acquiescence in 
the immutable laws of necessity, by which the world is governed. 
The resignation they prescribe appears to be part of their scheme 
to raise mankind to that liberty and self-sufficiency which it is 
the great end of their philosophy to procure. They assert that 
virtue is its own proper reward, and vice its own punishment; 
that all external things are indifferent; and that a wise man 
may be happy in the midst of tortures. The ultimate design of 
their philosophy was to divest human nature of all passions and 
affections; and they make the highest attainments and perfection 
of virtue to consist in a total apathy and insensibility of human 
evils. 



INTRODUCTION. 



XXIX 



The Plutonic philosophy is denominated from Plato, who was 
born in the eighty-seventh olympiad, 426 years before the 
nativity of Jesus Christ. He founded the old academy on the 
opinions of Heraclitus, Pythagoras, and Socrates; and by adding 
the information he had acquired to their discoveries, he estab- 
lished a sect of philosophers, who were esteemed more perfect 
than those who had before appeared in the world. 

The outlines of Plato's philosophical system were as follows: 
That there is one Grod, an eternal, immutable, and immaterial 
being, perfect in wisdom and goodness, omniscient and omnipre- 
sent. That this all-wise and perfect Being formed the universe 
out of a mass of pre-existing matter, to which he gave form and 
arrangem-ent. That there is in matter a necessary, but blind and 
refractory force, which refits the will of the Supreme Artificer, 
BO that he cannot perfectly execute his designs; and this is the 
cause of the mixture of good and evil which is found in the 
material world. That the soul of man was derived by emanation 
from God; but that this emanation was not immediate, but 
through the intervention of the soul of the world, which was 
itself debased by some material admixture. That the relation 
which the human soul, in its original constitution, bears to 
matter, is the source of moral evil. That when God formed the 
universe, he separated from the soul of the world inferior souls, 
equal in number to the stars, and assigned to each its proper 
celestial abode. That these souls were sent down to earth to be 
imprisoned in mortal bodies; hence proceed the depravity and 
misery to which human nature is liable. That the soul is 
immortal; and by disengaging itself from all animal passions, 
and rising above sensible objects to the contemplation of the 
world of intelligence, it may be prepared to return to its original 
habitation. That matter never suffered annihilation, but that 
the world will remain forever; but that by the action of its 
animating principle, accomplishes certain periods, within which 
everything returns to its ancient place and state. This periodical 
revolution of nature is called the Platonic or great year. 

The Platonic system makes the perfection of morality to con- 
sist in living in conformity to the will of God, the only author 
3* 



I N I E D U T I N- 



of true felicity; and teaches tliat our highest good conois-ts m 
ihe contemplation and knowledge of the Supreme Being, whom 
he emphatically styles tavyaOov^ the good. The end of this 
knowledge is to make men resemble the Deity as much as is 
compatible with human nature. This likeness consists in the 
possession and practice of all the moral virtues. 

After the death of Plato, many of his disciples deviated from 
his doctrines. His school was then divided into the old, the 
middle, and the new academy. The old academy strictly adhered 
to his tenets. The middle academy receded from his system 
without entirely deserting it. The new academy, founded by 
Carneades, an African by birth, almost entirely relinquished the 
original doctrines of Plato, and verged towards the sentiments 
which were taught by the Skeptic philosophy. 

The Skeptic or Pyrrhonic sect of philosophers derive their 
name from Pyrrho, a Grecian philosopher, who flourished at 
Peloponnesus, in the hundred and ninth olympiad. This deno- 
mination was in little esteem till the time of the E-oman empe- 
rors; then it began to ip crease, and made a considerable figure. 

Every advance which Pyrrho made in the study of philosophy 
involved him in fresh uncertainty. Plence he left the school of 
the dogmatists, and established a. school of his own on the 
principles of universal skepticism 

On account of the similarity of the opinions of this sect and 
those of the Platonic school in the middle and new academy, 
many of the real followers of Pyrrho chose to screen themsehes 
from the reproach of universal skepticism by calling themseh es 
Academics. 

Pyrrho and his followers rather endeavored to demolish every 
other philosophical structure than to erect one of their own 
They asserted nothing, but proposed positions merely by way of 
enunciation, vfithout deciding on which side, in any disputed 
question, the truth lay, or even presuming to assert that one 
proposition was more probable than another. On the subject of 
morals the Skeptics suspended their judgment concerning thi 
ground of the distinction admitted by the Stoics and others, 
'^^tween things in their nature good, evil; or indifferent. 



INTRODUCTION. 



XXXI 



The chief points of difference between tlie Pyrrhonists and 
A.cademics are these i The Academics laid it down as an axiom, 
that nothing can be known with certainty; the Pyrrhonista 
maintained that even this ought not to be positively asserted. 
The Academics admitted the real existence of good and evilj 
the Pyrrhonists suspended their judgment on this point. Tha 
Academics, especially the followers of Carneades, allowed different 
degrees of probability in opinion; but the Skeptics rejected all 
speculative conclusions, drawn either from the testimony of the 
senses, or from reasoning ; and concluded that we can have no 
good ground for affirming or denying any proposition, or em- 
bracing any one opinion rather than another. 

The Eclectic philosophy was in a flourishing state at Alexandria 
when our Saviour was upon earth. Its founders formed the 
design of selecting from the doctrines of ail former philosophers 
such opinions as seemed to approach nearest the truth, and of 
cijmbining them into one system. They held Plato in the highest 
esteem; but they did not scruple to join with his doctrines 
whatever they thought conformable to. reason in the tenets of 
other philosophers. Potamo, a Platonist, appears to have been 
the first projector of this plan. The Eclectic system was brought 
to perfection by Ammonias Saccas, who blended Christianity 
with the tenets of philosophy. 

The moral doctrine of the Alexandrian school was as follows * 
The mind of man, originally a portion of the Divine Being, 
having fallen into a state of darkness and defilement by its union 
with the body, is to be gradually emancipated from the chain of 
matter, and rise by contemplation to the knowledge and vision 
of God. The end of philosophy, therefore, is the liberation of 
the soul from its corporeal imprisonment. For this purpose the 
E'jlectic philosophy recommends abstinence, with other voluntary 
mortifications and religious exercises. 

In the infancy of the Alexandrian school, not a few of the 
professors of Christianity were led, by the pretensions of the 
Eclectic sect, to imagine that a coalition might, with great 
advantage, be formed between its system and that of Christianity 
This union appeared the more desirable, as several philosoj'h jr? 



XXXll 



INTRODUCTION. 



of this sect became converts to the Christian faith. The conse- 
quence was, that Pagan ideas and opinions were by degrees 
mixed with the pure and simple doctrines of the gospel. 

The Oriental philosophy was popular in several nations at the 
time of Christ's appearance. Before the commencement of the 
Christian era it was taught in the East, whence it gradually 
spread through the Alexandrian, Jewish, and Christian schools. 

The Oriental philosophers endeavored to explain the nature 
and origin of all things by the principle of emanation from an 
eternal fountain of being. The forming of the leading doctrines 
of this philosophy into a regular system has been attributed to 
Zoroaster, an ancient Persian philosopher. He adopted the 
principle generally held by the ancients, that from nothing, 
nothing can be produced. He supposed spirit and matter, light 
and darkness, to be emanations from one eternal source. The 
active and passive principles he conceived to be perpetually at 
variance; the former tending to produce good; the latter, evil; 
but that, through the intervention of the Supreme Being, the 
contest would at last terminate in favor of the good principle. 
According to Zoroaster, various orders of spiritual beings, gods, 
or demons, have proceeded from the Deity, which are more or 
less perfect, as they are at a greater or less distance in the course 
of emanation from the eternal fountain of intelligence, among 
which the human soul is a particle of divine light, which will 
return to its source and partak*^ of its immortality ; and matter 
is the last or most distant emanation from the first source of 
being, which, on account of its distance from the fountain of 
liglit, becomes opaque and inert, and whilst it remains in that 
state, is the cause of evil; but, being gradually refined, it will 
at length return to the fountain from whence it flowed. 

Those who professed to believe the Oriental philosophy were 
divided into three leading (sects, which were subdivided into 
various factions. Some imagined two eternal principles, from 
whenqe all things proceeded ; the one presiding over light, the 
other over matter, and, by their perpetual conflict, explainmg 
the mixture of good and evil that appears in the universe. 
Others maintained that the being which presided over mattei 



INTRODUCTION. 



xxxiii 



Tyas not an eternal principle, but a subordinate intelligence, one 
of those whom the supreme Grod produced from himself. They 
supposed that this being was moved by a sudden impulse to 
reduce to order the rude mass of matter which lay excluded 
from the mansions of the Deity, and also to create the human 
race. A third sect entertained the idea of a triumvirate of 
beings, in which the supreme deity was distinguished both from 
the material evil principle, and from the Creator of this sub- 
lunary world. That these divisions did really subsist, is evident 
from the hititory of the Christian sects which embraced this 
philosopliy. 

From blending the doctrines of the Oriental philosophy with 
Christianity, the G-nostic sects, which were so numerous in the 
hrst centuries, derive their origin. Other denominations arose, 
which aimed to unite Judaism with Christianity. Many of the 
Pagan philosophers, who were converted to the Christian religion, 
exerted all their art and ingenuity to accommodate the doctrines 
of the gospel to their own schemes of philosophy. In each age of 
the church new systems were introduced, till, in process of time, 
we find the Christian world divided into that prodigious variety 
of sentiment which is exhibited in the following pages. =^ 

* For the above iutroduction, we are indebted to Miss Hannah Adams 
" View of Rehgions."— Ed. 

C 



HISTORY OF RELIGIONS. 



BAPTISTS. 

The members of this denomination are distinguished 
from all other professing Christians, by their opinions re- 
specting the ordinance of Christian Baptism. Conceiving 
that positive institutions cannot be established by analogi- 
cal reasoning, but depend on the will of the Saviour, re- 
vealed in express precepts^ and that apostolical example 
illustrative of this is the rule of duty, they differ from 
their Christian brethren with regard both to the subjects 
and the mode of baptism. 

With respect to the subjects, from the command which 
Christ gave after his resurrection, and in which baptism is 
mentioned as consequent to faith in the gospel, they con- 
ceive them to be those, and those only, who believe what 
the apostles were then enjoined to preach. 

With respect to the mode, they affirm that, instead of 
sprinkling or pouring, the person ought to be immersed in 
the water, referring to the primitive practice, and observ- 
ing that the baptizer as well as the baptized having gone 
down into the water, the latter is baptized in it, and both 
come up out of it. They say that John baptized in the 
Jordan, and that Jesus, after being baptized, came up out 

(35) 



o6 



B A P T I S T S 



of it. Believers are also said to be buried with Christ by 
baptism into death, wherein also they are raised with him ' 
a doctrinal allusion, incompatible with any other mode 
Kom. vi. 4c, Col. ii, 12. For baptism here appears as an 
appointed and expressive emblem of the death of Christ, 
through which our sins are remitted or washed away, and 
of the resurrection of Christ, through which the Holy 
Spirit confers upon us a new spiritual life, in which every 
true believer enters into fellowship with him. In other 
words. Christian baptism is a figurative representation of 
that, which the Gospel of Christ is in testimony. To this, 
therefore, the mind of the baptized believer is naturally 
led, and every spectator in like . manner is impressed with 
the gospel, not only as truth, but life, derived by faith 
from the crucified and glorified Redeemer. The Baptists, 
l:herefore, think that none ought to be baptized, but such 
as with all their heart believe the gospel, and that immer- 
sion is not properly a mode of baptism, but baptism itself. 

Holding convictions at once so clear and sacred, drawn 
from the very fountain of truth, the Baptists, while difier- 
ing from other Christians, disclaim the spirit of schism. 
Feeling the authority of the Great Commission, which re- 
mains unchanged to the end of the world, they aim to 
carry out all its parts in the prescribed order, with the 
fidelity of a good conscience, as under law to Christ, and 
responsible alone to Him, on whose promised presence 
£tnd aid they humbly rely. Matt, xxviii : 19, 20. They pro 
fess to love all Christians as brethren ; but they own no 
other Master than Christ ; no other law in religion than his 
word ; no baptism but that which is hallowed by faith ; no 
church, but that which is the living body of Christ, per- 
vaded and animated by his Spirit. ISTeither birth, nor age, 
nor sex, nor nation, nor condition, in their view, can qualify 
for Christian ordinances, but the faith that worketh by love, 



BAPTISTS. 



37 



and which naturally unfolds in obedience to all things 
whatsoever Christ has commanded. 

As to Church organization and government, Baptists 
believe in the spiritual Unity of the Church, the collective 
body of believers, of which Christ is the head. This 
unity it is a duty to preserve and cherish, by subjection to 
Him in all things. Local churches, composed of believers 
in a particular place, who, being duly baptized, are em- 
bodied by mutual consent, under the law of Christ, for 
extending his kingdom, are the first scriptural means of 
manifesting this spiritual unity. The government of 
these churches is congregational ; that is to say, being 
immediately dependent on Christ, they are severally in. 
dependent of all other authority as churches ; though ag 
citizens, individually subject to the civil power, and loyal 
in its support. Each church is completely competent to 
manage its internal affairs, such as the choice of of&cers 
reception, dismission, or discipline of members. Here ia 
the only tribunal in which Christ presides, ratifying in 
heaven what is done accordinsr to his will on earth. But 

o 

this principle of local church independence is not held by 
Baptists as a law of isolation, for it is balanced by the 
principle of intercommunion between the churches, which 
binds them into one. This intercommunion is the highest 
form of visible unity, and is never without necessity to be 
interrupted. On this principle, Baptist churches associate 
for the accomplishment of all common ends, and especially 
for diffusing the gospel throughout the world. Councils 
also are called to advise and assist in the formation of 
cJ lurches, the ordination of ministers, and the settlement 
of any serious difficulties ; but these councils are strictly 
such, having no judicial or appellate powers. They are 
composed of both ministers and laymen ; between whom 
there is no distinction, but that of office. Ministers ar^ 

4 



38 



BAPTISTS. 



ordained, both as evangelists and pastors, and deacons 
also, after due examination, by prayer and tbe laying on 
of hands in solemn benediction. There are no highei 
officers recognized than these — no prelacy, no hierarchy— 
all pastors are equally bishops, in their sacred charge of 
the flock of Christ. 

The Baptists are zealous friends of ministerial educa- 
tion, as their numerous Colleges and Theological Semina 
ries show ; but they do not regard such education as in- 
dispensable to the Christian ministry, where all the scrip- 
tural qualifications are found ; as in John Bunyan and 
Andrew Fuller, who are among their brightest ornaments. 
Dr. Sprague's volume on the "Baptist Pulpit," is a 
monument of their eminent men, from the foundation of 
this country. Dr. Baird, also, in his great work on 
" Eeligion in America," has said ; " The ministry of the 
Baptists comprehends a body of men, who in point of 
talent, learning, and eloquence, as well as in devoted 
piety, have no superiors in the country." Through their 
labors, accompanied by the Divine blessing, the Baptists 
are now, with a single exception, the largest denomination 
of Christians in the United States, being spread through 
every State and T'erritory, and growing at a rate which 
outstrips the rapid growth of population. This fact is the 
more remarkable, as they are less indebted to emigration 
from Europe than most other denominations ; discard od 
principle infant baptlsn^ and birth-right membership, 
as incompatible with the genius of Christianity, and 
depend on the powe:. of truth and the Holy Spirit alone 
for the vital increase of thoir churches. It is the more 
remarkable still, because on all sides they are reproached 
for their strictness of practice on Church communion ; as 
they think, reproached wrongfully. A few words there- 
fore may be necessary on this point. 



BAPTISTS. 



89 



Baptists believe tliat, according to tlie scriptures, the 
Holy Supper is a churcli ordinaace, intended to express 
their common fellowsliip witli Christ, as the source and 
support of spiritual life; and that each church must 
therefore judge for itself on its responsibility to Christ, of 
the scriptural qualifications of all who apply for admission 
In requiring baptism and church fellowship among these 
qualifications, they agree with almost all Christians in 
every age and country ; they differ only in their views 
of baptism. If their views of baptism are correct, they 
are bound to apply them impartially to all who apply for 
admission to communion. The very fact that it is the 
Lord's table, and not their own, forbids them, even if 
they would, from changing at their pleasure the divine laws 
of approaching it. All who agree with them are wel- 
come to come ; those who do not, and cannot with a good 
conscience, are at perfect liberty to join elsewhere. Hard 
cases may arise with individuals, but the churches are 
not responsible. The right of private judgment is sacred, 
but it is equally so on both sides ; and the conscience of 
ihe individual cannot over-ride the conscience of the 
church ; for the fellowship of the Spirit cannot be forced. 
These views, so far from being narrow and bigoted, as 
some suppose, the Baptists believe to present the only 
true solution (5f this question of conscience, when viewed 
in its broadest aspect, and in the spirit of brotherly love. 
The strictest Baptists therefore claim, that their commu- 
nion, in any proper use of the term, i^free. A laxer and 
less consistent view obtains to some extent among Bap- 
tists in England ; but as it rests on no scriptural precept 
or practice, it is regarded by Baptists in the United States 
as a perilous anomaly, to be avoided rather than imitated. 
Not one of their twelve thousand churches indorses it 
not because they do not love and esteem other Christiana 



40 



BAPTISTS. 



but because love to tbeir brethren must be regulated 
its manifestations by tbe word of God. By this we know 
that we love the children of God^ vjhen we love God and keep 
his commandmeiits. 1 John v. 2. 

It is this clear conviction of the truth and equity of their 
principles, that has made the Baptists the pioneers of re- 
ligious liberty in its full extent, both in the Old World 
and in the ISTew. Before William Penn, before Lord 
Baltimore, before Jeremy Taylor, Milton, or Locke, even 
before William I. of Orange, in the sixteenth century, 
their clear testimony is on record. And theirs is the high 
honor of establishing in the little colony of Ehode Island, 
in 1636, the first civil government in modern times which 
declared that conscience should be free ; in which noble 
declaration, fifty years later, they were followed by the 
Friends, of Pennsylvania ; and since the Eevolution of 
1776, by all the United States. This honor history now 
awards them. But how few know what toils and sacrifices, 
what vigilance, patience, prayers, tears and blood, it cost 
the Baptists to win this boon of freedom for all mankind. 

As will be evident from the above exposition of their 
principles, the Baptists claim their origin from the minis- 
try of Christ and his Apostles. They further claim, that 
all the Christian churches of the first two centuries after 
Christ, were founded and built up upon these principles ; 
in proof of w^iich they appeal to the highest authorities 
in church history, such as Mosheim and Keander. Amid 
the growing defection of later times, they claim to be abl 
to trace their history in a succession of pure churches, . 
under various names, down to the Eeformation of the six | 
teenth century. From the fifth and sixth centuries, theso 
churches became the objects of relentless persecution • 
but though persecuted, they were not forsaken ; though 
scattered, not destroyed ; a bush forever burning, but un- 



BAPTISTS. 



consumed. The seeds of tlieir principles had long been 
sown throughout Europe ; the Waldenses had held them 
fast ; the Paterines suffered for them ; the Lollards dif- 
fused them; Wickliffe embraced them. At the first 
dawn of the Eeformation, they emerged on all sides, and 
after fifty years of unparalleled suffering, from Eomanists 
and Protestants alike, at last found protection under the 
Prince of Orange, the founder of the Dutch Eepublic. 
They were called indiscriminately Anabaptists, (or Ee- 
baptizers,) but they of course disowned the name, as in- 
compatible with their principles, and still more, as dis- 
graced by a small party of fanatics in Munster, with 
whom they had not the slightest identity or connection, 
What the main body really were, and how they bore 
their terrible sufferings, let Cardinal Hosius, President of 
the Council of Trent, testify : " If you behold their cheer- 
fulness in suffering persecution, the Anabaptists run 
before all the heretics, (i. e. Protestants.) If you have re- 
gard to the number, it is likely that they would swarm 
above all others, if they were not grievously plagued and 
cut off by the knife of persecution. If you have an eye 
to the outward appearance of godliness, both the Luthe- 
rans and the Zuinglians must needs grant that they far 
pass them. If you will be moved by the boasting of the 
word of God, these be no less bold than Calvin to preach ; 
and. their doctrine must stand aloft above all the glory of 
the world, must stand invincible above all power, because 
it is not their word, but the word of the living God." 

If there be a tinge of irony in the last sentence, there 
is certainly none in the honorable testimony to the an- 
ticpiity of the Baptists, in the following passage from the 
" History of the Eeformed Church of the Netherlands," 
by Drs. Ypeig and Dermout, clergymen of the high- 
est standing in that church, and published in Breda, 

4* 



42 



BAPTISTS. 



in 1819. " We have now seen that the Baptists, who were 
formerly called Anabaptists, and in later times Mennonites, 
were the original Waldenses, and have long, in the history 
of the church received the honor of that origin. On this 
account the Baptists may be considered as the only Chris- 
tian community which has stood since the days of the 
Apostles ; and as a Christian society which has preserved 
pure the doctrines of the Gospel through all ages." 

In regard to the value of religious forms, this body of 
Christians seem to hold a middle place between the Eo- 
man Catholics, who multiply them at will, and magnify 
their ef&cacy to salvation, and the Friends, or Quakers, 
who discard them altogether as inconsistent with a spirit- 
ual religion. In opposition to the first view, tbe Baptists 
hold that no forms but those of scriptural institution are 
valid, thus repudiating all traditions of men; and in refer- 
ence to those of Divine institution, the sacraments of 
Baptism and the Lord's Supper, that they have no inhe- 
rent virtue, or saving efficacy of the Holy Spirit, inde- 
pendent of the receiver's faith. In opposition to the 
Quaker view, the Baptists hold that the reception of the 
Holy Spirit, though essential to spiritual religion, does 
not make void the authority of Baptism and the Lord's 
Supper, or supersede their value as the appointed expres- 
sions and auxiliaries of faith ; and they particularly 
point to the conversion of the Gentiles in the house of 
Cornelius, at Cesar ea, in proof ; where Peter, full of the 
Holy Ghost himself, said, Can any man forbid water^ thai 
these should not he haptized, who have received the Jloly Ghost 
as well as we ? And he commanded them to he haptized in 
the name of the Lord. (Acts x. 47, 48.) 
• Instead of magnifying the efficacy of Baptism and 
making it a saving ordinance, the Baptists affirm that 
they make less of it than most religious denomin:;.tioP5 ; 



BAPTISTS. 



43 



for thej believe that infants are saved without it; in 
proof of which, they adduce the fact that Christ blessed 
little children, without baptizing them. Baptism (mean- 
ing immersion) is in their view but the symbol of faith, 
and it saves us, as Peter says, only in a figure, or so far 
only as it is the answer of a good conscience ioivard God. 

In their doctrine, the Baptists are in a high degree 
evangelical, holding the views commonly called Calvinis- 
tic, as set forth in the writings of Bunyan, Gill, and 
Fuller. The Confessions of 1613,1689, 1742, and 1833, 
are all in harmony, differing only in the choice of lan- 
guage and fulness of exposition. These Confessions are 
never regarded as binding creeds. 

There is a close afl&nity between the Baptists and the 
Congregationalists, and they are divided only on the point 
of baptism. The late Dr. Woods, of Andover, Mass., in 
1854, thus expresses his views of this af&nity : " For my- 
self, I entertain feelings of the most cordial esteem, love 
and confidence, toward the Baptists as a denomination. 
I have had the freest intercourse and the sincerest friend- 
ship with Baptist ministers, theological students, and pri- 
vate Christians. And I have wished that our denomina- 
tion was as free from erratic speculations, and as well 
grounded in the doctrines and experimental principles of 
the Puritans as the Baptists. It seems to me that they 
are the Christians who are likely to maintain pure Chris- 
tianity, and to hold fast the form of sound words ; while 
many of our denomination are rather loose in their 
opinions, and are trying to introduce innovations into 
the system of evangelical doctrines. And I think that 
Congregationalists in general regard the Baptists much 
as I do, though it may be that my better acquaintance 
with them has led me to esteem them more highly than 
some of my brethren do." See Ccitgregationalists. 



44 



BAPTISTS. 



The Baptist " Missionary Union," from its origin m 
Dr. Jndson's change of views on baptism, as well 
from the common aim of its endeavors, is in cor- 
dial sympathy with the "American Board of Commis- 
sioners for Foreign Missions" established by the Congre 
gationalists in 1810. The following comparative table 
of their successful operations, drawn up from the reports 
of the two societies in 1873, will be found interesting. It 
should be observed that the American Board, since 1870, 
has been supported by the Congregationalists, the Presby- 
terians having then withdrawn and taken several missions 
with them. The figures of the Missionary Union include all 
their European missions, from which no schools are reported. 





American 


Missionary 




Board. 


Union. 






May, 1814. 




.. $431,834 81 .... 


.. $216,100 70 




.. 474,132 88 .... 


.. 239,417 27 




19 .... 


15 




536 .... 


1700 


Missionaries, male and female... 


352 .... 


151 




930 .... 


814 




197 .... 


820 




794 .... 


4319 




9435 .... 


57,512 




529 .... 


228 




18,644 .... 


8102 




2 .... 


3 




.. 13,659,826 .... 


8,679,220 



The strength of the American Board in its resources, 
its missionary force, its vigorous schools, of which twelve 
are theological and training schools, and its multiplica- 
tion of books, is very manifest from this table. The Mis 
sionary Union's more exclusive attention to simple evan- 
gelization, with much less income and fewer missionaries, 
is also evident in its appropriate fruits. God's blessing 
has rested richly upon both. A like blessing has at- 



BAPTISTS. 



45 



tended their labors in Home Missions, as miglit be shown 
if the figures were at hand. The Baptists have indeed 
spread far more widely, and gathered converts more rap- 
idly ; from a much smaller beginning, now outnumbering 
the Congregationalists in this country fourfold. But, on 
the other hand, the Congregationalists, with a narrower 
field, have cultivated it more richly. At present there 
is a sort of interchange in the character of their home 
labors, the Baptists devoting themselves to a higher cul- 
ture, and their Congregational brethren to a more ener- 
getic efibrt of expansion. Their history, too, both in 
England and in this country, has flowed on in parallel 
streams, and the waters have often intermingled. The 
great names that adorn them are alike dear to both, and 
it may be hoped time will cement and perfect the union. 

The unity of the Baptist denomination, which is almost 
equaUy spread over all the United States, does not consist 
in f.ny external bond of authority distinct from the Bible, 
but in the internal fellowship of the churches and mem- 
bers in " one Lord, one faith, and one baptism." (Eph. 
iv. 6.) It was formerly expressed also by free co-opera 
tion in the same general missionary and benevolent socie- 
ties. This was gradually interrupted, as in other de- 
nominations, by the different position of the JSTorth and 
the South on the questions of slavery and of secession 
which culminated in the civil war of 1861. As early as 
1845, the Southern Baptists, partly from the wish to avoid 
agitation, and partly from the desire to engage their 
members more fully in the missionary enterprise by con- 
centrated action, witlidre^^^, and organized separate gen- 
eral societies for the South, which still continue in opera- 
tion, though greatly crippled by the war. The general 
societies for benevolent effort at the North were never so 
energetic, so well sustained, or so successful, as at the 



46 



EPISCOPALIANS. 



present. There is also increased activity in the Southern 
Baptist benevolent societies. 

The statistics of the Regular Baptist churches for the 
year 1873 were: Associations, 890; churches, 20,520; or- 
dained ministers, 12,598 ; baptisms during the year, 70,162; 
membership, 1,633,939.* There were, in 1873, 9222 Bap- 
tist Sabbath-schools, with 78,819 teachers and 623,383 
scholars, and 650,692 volumes in the libraries. The be- 
nevolent contributions of the year were $4,926,527.04. 
The number of Baptist colleges is 35 ; of theological semi- 
naries, 15; of academies and high schools, about 100; of 
periodicals, 56, of which 4 are German, 1 French and 1 
Welsh. 

If the minor sects of Baptists are added, the aggregate 
of membership will be 2,612,000, and the adherent popu- 
lation about 13,000,000. 



EPISCOPALIANS; 

OE, 

PEOTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH. 

The denomination of Christians called the Protestant 
Episcopal Church had its origin in England, where it is 
called the Church of England. 

The king is the supreme head ; by this authority he 
convenes and prorogues the convocations of the clergy. 
The Church is governed by two archbishops and twenty- 
five bishops. 

The Archbishop of Canterbury is styled the Prhaate of 
all England, and to him belongs the privilege of crown- 
ing the kings and queens of England. The province of 

" In British North America there are 18 associations, 765 churches, 
461 ministers, 71,348 members. 



EPISCOPALIANS. 



47 



Canterbury compreliends twenty-one bishoprics. In the 
province of the Arebbishop of York, who is called the 
Primate of England^ there are four bishoprics. 

Archbishops and bishops are appointed by the king, by 
what is called a conge d'elire, or leave to elect, which is 
sent to the dean and chapter, naming the person to be 
?liosen. 

The bishop of London, as presiding over the capital, 
has the precedence of all the others. The Bishop of Dur- 
ham has certain prerogatives, as presiding over a see that 
constitutes a county palatine ; the Bishop of Winchester 
is third in dignity ; the others take rank according to 
seniority of consecration. The archbishops and bishops 
(except the Bishop of Sodor and Man) have seats in the 
House of Lords, and are styled the spiritual lords. 

The archbishops have the title of grace, and most reve^ 
rend father in God, by divine providence ; bishops are 
addressed by the title of lord, and right reverend father 
i7i God, by divine permission. The former are said to be 
enthroned, the latter installed. 

To every cathedral belong several prebendaries and a 
dean, who form the dean and chapter, or council of the 
bishop. The next order of the clergy is that of arch- 
deacons ; their number is sixty ; their office is to reform 
abuses, and to induct into benefices. 

The most numerous and laborious order of the clergy 
are the deacons, curates, vicars, and rectors. The office 
of the deacon is confined to baptism, reading in the church, 
and assisting the priest at the communion. 

A parson is one who has full possession of all the rights 
of a parish church ; if the great tithes are impropriated, 
the priest is called a vicar ; if not, a rector : a curate is 
one who is not instituted to the cure of souls, but exercises 
the spiritual office in a parish under a rector or vicar. 



IS 



EPISCOPALIANS. 



The convocation of the clergy, which is the highest 
ecclesiastical court, has not been permitted by government 
to do any business since 1717, and is merely convened as 
a matter of form. The doctrines of the Church of England 
are contained in the thirty-nine articles ; the form of wor- 
ship is directed by a liturgy. 

The first steps to the establishment of the English 
Church were slow. It retained at first many of the fea- 
tures of the Roman Church, both in regard to doctrine 
and rites. 

After the parliament had declared Henry VIII. the only 
supreme head of the Church, and the convocation of the 
clergy had voted that the Bishop of Home had no more 
jurisdiction in England than any other foreign bishop, the 
articles of faith of the new Church were declared to con- 
vsist in the Scriptures and the three creeds, the Apostolic, 
the Nicene, and the Athanasian ; the real presence, the 
use of images, the invocation of saints, kc , were still 
maintained. 

Under Edward the new liturgy was composed m English, 
and took the place of the old mass ; the doctrines were 
also stated in forty-two articles. With the reign of Mary, 
the old religion was rcrestablished ; and it was not till that 
of Elizabeth that the Church of England was finally insti- 
tuted. As no change was made in the episcopal form of 
government, and some rites and ceremonies were retained 
which many of the Keformed considered as superstitious, 
this circumstance gave rise to many future dissensions. 

The controversy concerning the ceremonial part of 
divine worship commenced with those exiles who, in 1554, 
lied from the persecutions of Queen Mary, and took refuge 
in Germany. On the accession of Elizabeth they returned, 
and renewed the contest at home which had begun abroad 



EPISCOPAT lANS. 



49 



These were called Puritans, and at one time comprised 
many distinguished members of the English clergy. 

On the accession of James, the Puritans hoped for some 
relief ; but an Episcopal hierarchy was more favorable to 
his views than the Presbyterian form of government, and 
he publicly adopted the maxim, "No bishop, no king." 

When the English divines returned from the Synod of 
Dort, the king and the majority of the Episcopal clergy 
discovered an inclination to the sentiments of Arminius, 
which have since prevailed over Calvinism among the 
English clergy. 

Under Charles I., the attempts made, through the in- 
strumentality of Laud, to reduce all the churches of Great 
Britain under the jurisdiction of bishops, and the suppres- 
sion of the opinions and institutions that were peculiar to 
Calvinism, cost the Archbishop of Canterbury his head, 
and had no little effect in imbittering the civil contest 
between the throne and the parliament. After the death 
of Laud, the parliament abolished the Episcopal govern- 
ment, and condemned everything in the ecclesiastical esta- 
blishment that was contrary to the doctrine, worship, and 
discipline of the Church of Geneva. 

As soon as Charles II. was restored to the throne, the 
ancient forms of ecclesiastical government and public wor- 
ship were restored ; and, in 1662, a public law, entitled 
the act of uniformity, was enacted, by which all who re- 
fused to observe the rites and subscribe the doctrines of 
the Church of England, were entirely excluded from its 
dominion. 

In the reign of William III., and particularly in 1689, 
the divisions among the friends of Episcopacy gave rise 
to the two parties called the high-churchmen, or non- 
jurors, and loiv-churchmen. The former maintained the 
doctrine of passive obedience, or non-resistance to the 

5 D 



50 



EPISCOPALIANS. 



sovereign under anj circumstance whatever ; that the 
hereditary succession to the throne is of d^'vine institution, 
and cannot be interrupted: that the Church is subject to 
the jurisdiction of God alone ; and, consequently, that 
certain bishops deposed by King William remained, not- 
withstanding, true bishops ; and that those who had been 
appointed in their places were rebels and schismatics, and 
all v^'ho held communion with them were guilty of rebellion 
and schism. 

The gradual progress of civil and religious liberty during 
the last one hundred and fifty years, has settled practically 
many such controversies. The great increase of the dis- 
senters in recent times (they are estimated to be more 
numerous than the members of the established Church) 
has led to new concessions in their favor ; the repeal of 
the corporation and test acts, and the Catholic emanci'pa- 
tion, as it is called, are among the important events of the 
late reign. 

We have said that the doctrines of the Church of Eng- 
land are contained in the thirty-nine articles ; we are not 
ignorant that the most eminent English divines have 
doubted whether they are Calvinistic or Lutheran, that 
some have denominated them articles of jpeace^ and that 
not a few have written in direct opposition to them. But 
they are the established confession of the English Church, 
ind, as such, deserve a short analysis. The five first arti- 
cles contain a profession of faith in the Trinity; the incar- 
nation of Jesus Christ, his descent to hell, and his resur- 
rection ; the divinity of the Holy Ghost. The three 
following relate to the canon of the Scripture. The eighth 
article declares a belief in the Apostles', Nicene, and 
Achanasian creeds. The ninth and following articles con- 
tain the doctrines of original sin, of justification by faith 
n,Ione, of piedestination, kc. The nineteenth, twentieth, 



EPISCOPALIANS. 



51 



and twenty-first declare the Churcli to be the assembly of 
the faithful ; that it can decide nothing except by the 
Scriptures. The twenty-second rejects the doctrine of 
purgatory, indulgences, the adoration of images, and the 
invocation of saints The twenty-third decides that only 
those lawfully called shall preach or administer the sacra- 
ments. The twenty-fourth requires the liturgy to be in 
English. The twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth declare the 
sacraments efiectual signs of grace (though administered 
by evil men), by which God excites and confirms our faith. 
They are two ; baptism and the Lord's Supper. Baptism, 
according to the twenty-seventh article, is a sign of regene- 
ration, the seal of our adoption, by which faith is con- 
firmed and grace increased. In the Lord's Supper, ac*- 
cording to article twenty-eighth, the bread is the commu- 
nion of the body of Christ, the wine the communion of 
his blood, but only through faith (art. twenty -ninth) ; and 
the communion must be administered in both kinds (art. 
thirty). The twenty-eighth article condemns the doctrine 
of transubstantiation, and the elevation and adoration of 
the host ; the thirty-first rejects the sacrifice of the mass 
as blasphemous ; the thirty-second permits the marriage 
of the clergy ; the thirty-third maintains the efiicacy of 
excommunication. The remaining articles relate to the 
supremacy of the king, the condemnation of Anabap- 
tists, &c. 

In the United States, the members of the Church of 
England, or Episcopalians, form a large and respectable 
denomination. When the Revolutionary War began, thera 
were only about eighty parochial clergymen of this Church 
to the northward and eastward of Maryland; and they 
derived the greater part of their subsistence from the 
English Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in 
Foreign Parts. lu Maryland and Virginia, the Episcopal 



52 



EPISCOPALIANS. 



Church was much more numerous, and had legal estahlish- 
ments for its support. The inconvenience of depending 
on the mother Church for ordination, and the want of an 
internal Episcopacy, was long severely felt by the Ameri- 
can Episcopalians. But their petitions for an Episcopate 
of their own were long resisted by their superiors in Eng 
land ; and their opponents in the United States objected 
to the measure from an apprehension that bishops from 
England would bring with them an authority which would 
interfere with the civil institutions of this country, and be 
prejudicial to the members of other communions. After 
the United States had become independent of Gr«at 
Britain, a new difficulty arose on the part of the English 
bishops : they could not consistently depart from their 
own stated forms of ordination, and these contained politi- 
cal tests improper for American citizens to subscribe. 
Dr. Lf wth, then Bishop of London, obtained an act of 
Parliament allowing him to dispense with these political 
requisitions. Before this act was passed. Dr. Seabury 
was consecrated at Aberdeen by the non-juring bishops of 
Scotland ; and, not long after. Dr. W. White, of Philadel- 
phia, Dr. Provoost, of New York, and Dr. James Madison, 
of Virginia, were consecrated by the English archbishops. 

In 1792 there were four bishops and about 200 clergy. 
In 1832 there were fifteen bishops and 583 clergy. In 
1855 the number of bishops had increased to thirty-eight, 
and the clergy to 1714, while the communicants were re- 
ported to be 105,350. At the beginning of 1874 their 
statistics were : Dioceses, 41 ; missionary jurisdictions, 10; 
bishops, 54 ; clergy, 3055 ; parishes, 2732 ; communicants, 
246,051 ; Sunday-school teachers and scholars, 247,002 ; 
contributions for missionary and church purposes, 
$7,187,417.17. Adherent population, about 1,300,000. 

In the winter of 1873-4, the Assistant Bishop of Ken- 



DUTCH REFORMED CHURCH. 



53 



tucky seceded from the Protestant Episcopal Church of 
the United States^ and with others founded the Reformed 
Protestant Episcopal Church. This Church is an active pro- 
test against Ritualism and exclusiveness in the P. E. Church. 
It has, in 1874, two bishops and about twenty clergy. 

Each diocese holds an Annual Convention, composed of 
clergy and lay delegates elected by the people, in which 
the bishop presides. 

Every three years a General Convention is held, com- 
posed of the bishops, who form the House of Bishops ; and 
' clerical and lay delegates from each diocese, who form the 
House of Delegates : and the Episcopal Chjirch through- 
out the United States is governed by the canons of the 
General Convention. 



EEFOKMED CHUKCH IN AMEKICA. 
(Late Dutch.) 

The colony of New Amsterdam, now New York, was 
settled in 1612 bj the Dutch. Missionaries and pious 
immigrants arrived here in the very beginning of the 
colony, but it is not known at what time a church was first 
organized. The . Collegiate Church is supposed to have 
been formed in 1619. The Dutch Reformed Church is by 
many years earlier than any other Presbyterian church in 
this country. It differs but slightly from the other Ameri- 
can Presbyterian churches. Unfortunately, the names 
used for its officers and ecclesiastical bodies, and the name 
of the church itself, do not impart to the English reader a 
clear view of the things represented. It should be re- 
membered, then, that the Dutch Reformed Church is no 
longer a Dutch church. Its services are all performed in 

5* 



54 



DUTCH REFORMED CHURCH. 



English, and all its modes of action are naturalized to our 
country ; so that no church among us is more perfectly 
American, or better adapted to make an effectual move- 
ment in the propagation of religion among our varied 
population. 

If its name were changed, and its dominie were called a 
minister, its consistory a session, its classis a presbytery, 
and its general synod a general assembly, there would be 
little remaining to distinguish it from the American Pres- 
byterian Church. 

From the commencement of the Dutch Reformed Church 
in this country, it was subordinate to the classis of Am- 
sterdam till 1737. In this year a movement was made to 
throw off dependence on the parent classis. This occa- 
sioned a violent contest, which was not terminated till 
1771 ; when the Rev. Dr. Livingston, having previously 
convinced the classis of Amsterdam of the desirableness 
of the measure, and having prepared the way by concili- 
ating wise men of both parties, induced the consistory of 
Lis church to call a convention. The convention met in 
N'ew York in October, and resulted in a harmonious ar- 
rangement for a complete organization of the Dutch Re- 
formed Church in this country as an independent body. 
It receives the confession of faith, as adopted by the na- 
tional synod of the Council of Dort in the years 1618 and 
1619, with the Heidelberg Catechism, the Compend of the 
Christian religion, and the canons of the Council of Dort 
on the famous five points. It is strictly Calvinistic. 

Th*^ Dutch Reformed Church has a limited liturgy, 
which is allowed to be used by those who, through a defec- 
tive education or inexperience, need such helps. The only 
part which is enjoined is the reading of the Ten Com- 
mandments in the opening of the morning service, the 
form of baptism, the short prayer before the vows taken 



DUTCH REFORMED CHURCIl. 



55 



by parents in the baptism of infants, and the formula of 
the holy communion of the Lord's Supper. This last is 
read by the minister, while all the members carefully and 
devoutly follow him, with the book open before them. 
There is a single point in which their government differs 
from other branches of the Presbyterian Church. The 
ruling elders, instead of being elected for life, are appointed 
for two years. If acceptable to the church, they may be 
appointed again after having been out of office for one 
year. 

The government of the Dutch Reformed Church is 
Presbyterian. It is fully described in the article on 
Presbyterians. They only use a different nom.enc1ature, in 
sorae respects, in speaking of ecclesiastical affairs. The 
consistory, or session, is composed of the minister, or 
bishop, ruling elders, and deacons. The pastor and elders 
meet as a spiritual court to transact the spiritual concerns, 
such as the admission of members, and the exercise of dis- 
cipline. The deacons are charged with the care of the 
poor. The consistory, including the deacons, meet as a 
board of trustees, for the transaction of the secular busi- 
ness of the church. On great occasions, such as the call- 
ing of a minister, what is termed the grand consistory is 
called together. This is composed of the acting session, 
and all who have previously belonged to that body. The 
next court is the classis, or presbytery ; the next, the par- 
ticular si/7iod, which, like the classis, is a representative 
body. It consists of two ministers and two elders from 
each classis within its bounds. The highest court, from 
which there is no appeal, is the general synod. This is 
composed of three ministers and three elders from each 
classis of the whole church. It holds its sessions annu- 
ally, and conducts its affairs much in the same method 
"witb the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church, 



56 



DUTCH REFORMED CHURCH 



The college and theological seminary at New Brunswick^ 
N. J., are an honor to the Dutch Church. Amply en- 
dowed, and furnished witli able professors, they exert their 
full share of influence in raising up a learned and able 
ministry. This cburch reports in the Minutes of the Gen- 
eral Synod for 1847 — particular synods, 2; classes, 24; 
ministers, 289; churches, 276; communicants, 32,840, 
members of congregations, 110,977. 

In the American Almanac for 1859, the Dutch Re- 
formed Church is stated to have 324 churches, accommo- 
dations for 181,986 worshippers, and church property to 
the amount of $4,096,730. 

The sessions of the General Synod held during the war 
were marked by weighty and earnest declarations of sym- 
pathy with the government in its struggle to maintain the 
integrity of the nation, and by more guarded yet suffi- 
ciently clear utterances in favor of the removal of slavery 
as the source of our troubles. 

No Church has a more honorable record in the work of 
Foreign Missions than this, and no names in this depart- 
ment are more favorably known to the Christian world 
than her Abeel, Pohlman, and above all her Scudders, 
father and sons. In 1817 the General Synod united 
with the Presbyterian and the Associate Eeformed 
churches in forming the United Foreign Missionary So- 
ciety. In 1826 this was merged in the American Board 
of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. In 1857 an 
amicable separation from the Board took place, when the 
Reformed Dutch Church undertook the foreign mission- 
ary work through the ordinary denominational channels. 
In the separation, the Amoy mission in China and the 
Arcot mission in India, which had been founded and 
carried on by ministers of the Dutch Church exclusively, 
were set over to that denomination, and they have been 



DUTCH REFORMED CHURCH. 



57 



among tlie most prosperous missions in that part of the 
world. 

At the timd of the separation, the General Synod re- 
quested the ministers and churches in China, after the 
example of those in India, to form themselves into a 
classis, according to the order of the Dutch Church. 
This they declined doing, preferring to form, with the 
flourishing congregations of the English Presbyterian 
Mission, a separate organization, called " The Great Pres- 
byterial or Classical Council of Amoy." 

In 1863 missionaries were sent to Japan. In 1866 
Rev. S. K. Bowen, missionary at Yokohama, sent a cir- 
cular of great interest to Christians in all parts of the 
world, showing the marvellous preparation for the en- 
trance of the Gospel in that country. He asked the co- 
operation of Christendom in the work of evangelizing 
Japan. Four of the foremost princes have requested a 
missionary to superintend their educational interests. 
Two governors consulted with the missionary on the 
same subject, and large numbers of Christian books in 
Chinese have been purchased or distributed among the 
natives. 

In 1866, a committee of the General Classis was ap- 
pointed to inquire into the expediency and propriety ol 
dropping the word " Dutch " from the name of the de- 
nomination. Next year the General Synod, by 102 to 7, 
voted in favor of the change, and on submitting the ques- 
tion to the classes, 25 voted in favor and 6 against it. 
The adjourned meeting of the General Synod in Novem- 
ber ratified the action of the classes by a vote of 112 to 
7. By this action, the name and style of the Church 
became "The Reformed Church in America.^' The 
charter of the Church was amended to conform to thi*» 
Cihange by the Legislature of New York. 



58 



REFORMED 



CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. 



Statistics for the close of 1873 : 34 classes, 481 churches, 
501 ministers, 67,123 commuDicants, 41,244 families con- 
nected with the church, indicating an adherent population 
of about 206,000; Sunday-school teachers and scholars, 
67,050 ; contributions to general benevolence, $276,879.32 ; 
for congregational purposes, $1,057,430.30. 



KEFOEMED CHURCH IN THE UNITED 
STATES. (Late Geeman.) 

This Church is the legitimate descendant of the Reformed 
churches of Germany, Holland, Switzerland and France, 
differing from them in a few minor points, but holding 
firmly to the Heidelberg or Palatinate Catechism as its 
doctrinal basis. Like the Lutheran Church, it claims its 
origin from the Reformation, and in some points of its 
Confession may claim with justice a still earlier origin, its 
creed being mainly that of the Reformers before the Refor- 
mation, John Huss, Jerome of Prague, etc. 

In the United States its doctrinal status has been some- 
what modified by both surrounding and internal influ- 
ences — the first tending to draw its membership into closer 
doctrinal sympathy with the Methodists and other Armin- 
ian denominations, and the second seeking to establish Cal- 
vinistic views, but at the same time such " High Church " 
doctrines as tended toward a modified Romanism. At one 
time there seemed to be danger of a division of the Church 
on these issues, and some of its eminent clergymen left its 
communion and joined that of the Dutch Reformed Church. 
Recently the High Church party have made some conces- 
sions, and have thereby gained a wider influence, so that 
the Church is nov/ somewhat more harmonious in its 



KEFORMED CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. 59 



views and teachings. In 1872, however, the Triennial 
Convention of the Church, in what w-as known as the 
Super- Appeal Case, decided against the High Church 
party by a vote of 100 to 78. Its origin in this country 
dates from 1727, v/hen a colony of about 400 Palatines 
settled in Montgomery county, Pennsylvania, and under 
the leadership of Rev. George Michael Weiss, one of their 
number, organized a congregation and became the first 
German Reformed Church in America. After a period of 
twenty years of chaos, in which these emigrants, members 
of the Reformed Church in their native country, had in- 
creased to 30,000, but were almost wholly without preach- 
ers or pastors, and with but very slight religious instruc- 
tion. Rev. Michael Schlatter, a Reformed minister from 
St. Gall, Switzerland, commissioned by the Synods of 
North and South Holland, came over to America to or- 
ganize these churches and arrange for the administration 
of the ordinances, the establishment of schools and the sup- 
plying of a godly and competent ministry. For many 
years this noble, earnest. Christian apostle did a great and 
good w^ork among the German churches. He effected the 
organization of the first Coetus, or Sub-Synod of the Ger- 
man Reformed Church in America, which, after being for 
forty-six years under the jurisdiction of the Synod of Hol- 
land, became, in 1793, independent. He returned to Europe 
repeatedly, raised a fund for the support of ministers, mis- 
sionaries and school-teachers in America, and for the pur- 
chase of Bibles for the people, and induced a number of 
young ministers to come out to America and become pas- 
tors. In 1793 there were more than 150 churches, but 
only 22 ordained ministers living, in connection with the 
German Reformed Church. There were a considerable 
number of teachers, who officiated in the Sabbath-schools, 
reading sermons, catechizing the young, etc. Almost 



60 REFOEMED CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. 

every minister had from three to eight congregations under 
his care. 

During the following thirty-two years the number and 
wealth of the congregations advanced with great rapidity, 
and the number of their ordained ministers had increased 
to 82 ; but they were not so well educated or so thoroughly 
trained in theology as at an earlier period. The denomi- 
nation had no college or theological seminary, and the 
young ministers either acquired their classical training in 
the colleges of other denominations or not at all, while 
their theological training was obtained from the teaching 
of ministers who were the pastors of from three to eight 
churches. This instruction might well have been charac- 
terized as that of " the school of the peripatetics." There 
were also ecclesiastical and doctrinal disorders which threat- 
ened the spiritual life of the Church. About 1815, zeal- 
ous efforts were made to improve the condition of the 
Church ; the Heidelberg Catechism was formally an- 
nounced as their doctrinal standard, and in 1820 the min- 
isters were enjoined to use no other work in preparing the 
youth for confirmation. In 1819, strenuous efforts began 
to be made to establish a theological seminary ; but though 
authorized in 1824, it was not until 1825 that such a sem- 
inary was opened, at first at Carlisle, Pa., removed to York, 
Pa., in 1829, and to Mercersburg, Pa., in 1835, where it 
remained until 1871, when it was once more removed to 
Lancaster, Pa. The influence of this theological seminary 
upon the Church was very powerful. Its professors soon 
adopted and announced what are known as High Church 
doctrines, or " the Mercersburg theology," which they and 
their followers have defended with great acuteness and 
ability in their quarterly, the Mercersburg Review." 
Adopting, as the Church had previously done, the Heidel- 
berg Catechism as their doctrinal standard, but insisting 



REFORMED CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. 61 



on its interpretation in connection with the Apostles' 
Creed, and giving their own interpretation to both, they 
proceeded farther to summarize their doctrinal belief 
(which they declared to be also that of the Church) on 
points not directly connected with the Heidelberg Cate- 
chism, in the following terms (the summary is in the 
words of Rev. E. Y. Gerhart, D. D., now or lately presi- 
dent of the Theological Seminary and of the United States 
or Eastern Synod of the Church) : 

The Church affirms that the person of Christ is the 
true principle of sound theology ; that Christianity is a 
new life ; that the humanity of Christ is an essential con- 
stituent of Christianity ; that the Christian Church is an 
organic continuation in time and space of the life powers 
of the new creation in Christ Jesus; that the covenant is 
an order or institution of grace, spiritual and real ; that 
the Bible was written by members of the Church under 
plenary inspiration of the Holy Ghost ; that private judg- 
ment is subordinate to the general judgment of the Church 
as expressed particularly in the Ecumenical creeds ; that 
the Word of God is the only norm of faith and practice, 
and is superior to all creeds and confessions ; that the in- 
dividual comes to a right apprehension of the contents of 
the Bible through the teaching of the Church ; that the 
election of grace unto life is effectual in and by the estab- 
lished economy of grace; that justification is by an act of 
faith in the person and work of Christ, and consists both 
in the imputation and impartation of Christ and his right- 
eousness ; that holy baptism is the sacrament of regenera- 
tion, regeneration being the transition from the state of 
nature to the state of grace, as natural birth is the transi- 
tion to the natural world ; that regeneration, succeeded by 
conversion and sanctification, completes itself in the resur- 
rection from the dead, inasmuch as regeneration and salva- 
6 



62 REFORMED CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. 



tion pertain to the entire man, the body no less than the 
soul ; that believers only hold communion with Christ in 
the Lord's Sapper ; that the ordinary, divinely ordained 
means of grace are adequate to all the needs of the Church 
and the world, and, if faithfully used, do not fail to pro- 
mote a steady and vigorous growth of the Church ; that 
although the Church of Rome holds many articles of faith, 
and approves and perpetuates many customs which are not 
warranted by the Scriptures and are vv^rong, she is never- 
theless a part of the Church of Christ ; and that Protest- 
antism is an historical continuation of the Church catholic, 
in ^ new and higher form of faith, organization and 
practice." 

It is somewhat doubtful whether a majority of the mem- 
bers or ministers of the German Reformed Church would 
give their unqualified assent to all of these doctrines. In 
what is known as the Eastern Synod, or Synod of the 
United States, a decided majority undoubtedly believe in 
them ; in the Western and some of the other synods a 
large majority oppose them. The Reformed Church is 
Presbyterian in its form of Church government, and, in 
the main, in its doctrines, and members are received from 
one communion into the other. It differs from the Re- 
formed (late Dutch) Church in not accepting, as exponents 
of the Heidelberg Catechism, the Belgic Confession and 
the decrees of the Synod of Dort. It is probable, too, that 
the summary of principles given above v/ould hardly be 
accepted by all the Dutch ministers. Still, there is a cor- 
dial and sympathetic feeling between the two churches. 
The Low Church element in the German Church has re- 
cently established a theological seminary in connection 
with Ursinus College at Collegeville, Pa., and had previ- 
ously one at Tiflin, Ohio. 

As to its worship, the Reformed Church v/as originally 



REFORMED CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. 63 

liturgical, but every synod, and sometimes each classis, bad 
its own liturgy. In tbis country tbere was an equal lack 
of uniformity, and in many instances tbe liturgical forms 
were superseded by extemporaneous prayers and readings. 
Several attempts bave been made to remedy tbis difficulty, 
but v/itb only partial success. Tbe Provisional Liturgy 
reported in 1857 was tbe subject of mucb controversy till 
1864, wben it w^as referred to a large and able committee 
representing all sbades of opinion in tbe Cburcb, wbo, in 
1866, reported an Order of Worsbip for tbe Reformed 
Cburcb.'^ After long discussion tbis was commended for 
optional use by tbe General Synod in November, 18*66, 
and is coming into very general use wbolly or in part. 

Tbe German Reformed Cburcb bas bad a Board of Mis- 
sions for several years, but it was not incorporated until 
1873. Tbey bave not bitberto engaged directly in Foreign 
Mission work, or at least bave sent out no missionaries re- 
sponsible solely to tbem. For several years tbey sustained 
a missionary of tbe American Board, Rev. Dr. Scbneider, 
in Syria, wbo w^as bimself a member of tbeir Cburcb and 
a very earnest and effective missionary. More recently 
tbey bave maintained two missionaries of tbe German 
Evangelical Missionary Society of New York, in India, 
wbo were connected witb tbe General Synod of tbe Re- 
formed Cburcb. At tbe meeting of tbe Board of Missions 
in April, 1873, resolutions were passed looking to tbe sup- 
port of one or more missionaries of tbeir ow^n in japan. 

Tbe statistics of tbe Cburcb for tbe year 1873 were: 
1 General Synod, convened triennially; 5 synods, viz.: 
tbe Obio Synod, witb 9 classes ; tbe Nortb- western Synod 
(7 classes); tbe Synod of tbe Reformed Cburcb in tbe 
United States (8 classes), better known as tbe Eastern 
. Synod ; tbe Pittsburg Synod (6 classes) ; and tbe Potomac 
Synod (5 classes) : in all, 35 classes, 695 ministers, 1329 



64 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 

congregations, 132,195 confirmed and 76,133 unconfirmed 
members, of whom 110,551 are communicants; 64,588 Sun- 
day-school scholars; benevolent contributions, $91,427.19. 
There were 8 colleges, 3 theological seminaries, 1 mission 
house, 2 orphan houses, 4 academies, 16 periodicals (5 of 
them German), and about 1,000,000 of adherent popu- 
lation. 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHEEAN CHUKCH. 

The Lutheran Church is that body of Christian confes- 
sors, or aggregate of particular Churches, who adhere to 
the Augsburg Confession, as a correct exhibit of the great 
doctrines taught in the sacred Scriptures of the Old and 
New Testaments. These Churches are found in the Ger- 
manic States, Prussia, Austria, France, Denmark, Norw^ay, 
Sweden, Russia, Poland, Finland, Hungary, Bohemia, the 
Netherlands, European Turkey, England, the United 
States, Canadas, Nova Scotia, East and West Indies, 
South America, Africa, and other parts of the world. 
Some of them adhere to the Augsburg Confession with 
more rigidness than others ; but, in some form, that great 
Confession is their acknowledged Symbol, by which they 
testify to each other, and to the world, their mutual afl&lia- 
tion, and their distinctness from all others. 

It has been said that the birthday of the Lutheran 
Church was the 31st of October, 1517, when Luther 
nailed upon the Church-door of Y/ittenberg his ninety- 
five Theses against the infamous traffic in indulgences, 
setting forth the only way of forgiveness in Christ Jesus ; 
that the day of her baptism was the 17th of April, 1521, 
when Luther appeared before the Diet of Worms, and, in 
the face of all the powers on earth, avowed his unflinch- 
ing adherence to conscience and the plain word of God ; 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 65 

that the day of her confirmation was the 25th of June, 
1530, when the Lutheran princes stood up before the im- 
perial throne of Charles V., at the Diet of Augsburg, and 
gave out that noble Confession of the true Christian faith, 
which will ever remain "the heroic monument of the 
most admirable acts with which Christian history makes 
us acquainted and that the day when she reached her 
maturity, and became of age, was the 26th of September, 
1555, when the religious wars of Germany terminated in the 
Peace of Augsburg, and gave to Protestant Christians their 
political recognition and the free enjoyment of their faith. 

But Lutherans say it was not there, nor thence, that their 
principles were derived, nor those great events that origi- 
nated what is known as the Lutheran Church. They say 
that its root runs back into the ages of Prophets and 
Apostles, that its true birth was in the birth of Jesus, 
and that its true baptism, that which occurred at Jerusa- 
lem on the day of Pentecost. " Whilst Luther amended 
the gravest errors and vices of the Church of Kome, and 
restored the Church to a happier condition, he did not 
frame a new Church," says Buddeus. " The Keformers 
desired not, and are not to be considered founders of a 
Dew Church, but simply renewers of the old upon its an- 
cient foundation," says Sartorius. "The doctrine of the 
Lutherans,^' says Walch, " is no new doctrine ; it is the 
same which has been steadfastly preserved in the Church 
from old, and from the times of the Apostles : for we 
teach nothing in our Churches, except what the pure, an- 
cient, apostolic Christian Church teaches." 

Lutherans are very particular to distinguish between 
the Eomish Church, in the specific sense of the papal sys- 
tem, and the true Catholic Church of Christ, of which 
the papacy had taken possession. The one is human ; the 
other is divine. The one originated with the Apostles, 
6* E 



66 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 



and with Christ, whose earthly body it is ; the other arose 
during the sixth and'seventh centuries after Christ. The 
one existed before there was a pope, or a papal system, and 
lience, of course, does not cease with the expulsion and 
ibandonment of the pope and his system. Departure 
from the corruptions and false authorities which had risen 
ip in the true Church, does not, by any means, involve 
ieparture from the Church itself. "No one, therefore," 
«ays Heerbrand, "can justly charge us with apostasy; for 
tve have in no way departed from the true Church of God, 
but only from that of malignants and Antichrist, which 
has hated us, and from v/hich the Holy Ghost also directs 
and commands us to depart." When the Lutherans re- 
nounced the papacy and its abominations, they took with 
them the same Bible, the same Ecumenical Confessions, 
the same holy Faith, and the same apostolic ministry and 
sacraments, which distinguished the true Church from the 
beginning, and hence the same historic Church-life, which 
took its rise in the incarnation of the Son of God, trickled 
feebly through the rubbish and darkness of the middle 
ages, and never was, or could be, entirely lost. 

The Church before the Reformation had three general 
Creeds, the Apostles', the Nicene, and the Athanasian. 

The Apostles' Creed took its being and shape from the 
Formula of Baptism given by the Lord Himself, and was 
the natural and necessary fruit of it, by which all the 
earliest Churches, almost simultaneously, and without 
formal agreement, united in the expression of their one 
common faith. 

Out of this primary Creed as naturally grew the Nicene, 
necessitated as it was by the great controversies of the 
third and fourth centuries, concerning the Trinity, and 
especially by the' heretical tenets of the Arians and Mace- 
donians. Then came the Nestorian and Eutychian agita- 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 67 

tions, which called for still closer definitions and stricter 
guards of the great substance of the faith. These were 
realized in the Athanasian Creed. 

All these Creeds thus having a necessary and unrelin- 
quishable connection with the Church's utterance and pre- 
servation of what she received direct from Christ and 
His inspired Apostles and Evangelists, the Lutherans 
hold, cannot be abandoned without unmaking the Spirit- 
moved history of the universal body of the truest and 
best disciples Christ had upon earth in the course of more 
than a thousand years, as they show us the true Catholic 
faith as wrought out in the consciousness of the members 
of the true body of Christ, and rest directly, and only on 
the Holy Scriptures. 

To these essential and Catholic expressions of the faith, 
the Lutheran Church adheres, next to the Scriptures, as 
right utterances of the contents of God's word with regard 
to the questions and circumstances which gave them being. 
So far, then, she is soundly Catholic, and vitally con- 
joined with the only proper Church, for the first fifteen 
centuries of its existence. 

At the time of the Keformation, there were still other 
relations of the contents of the Gospel, which it had be- 
come as necessary to define as those with which the Ecu- 
menical symbols dealt. 

The Augsburg Confession, therefore, it is claimed, is as 
deeply inlaid v/ith the historic conservation of the Gospel 
in the convictions and belief of men, as any of the oldei 
Creeds ; that it grew out of similar necessities, was fashioned 
by a like law, proceeded from a corresponding Spirit-moveJ 
source, and to the same end ; and that it can no more be 
abandoned now, and yet the pure Catholic faith be re- 
tained, than the Ecumenical symbols which went before it. 

And upon the Augsburg Confession, as necessarily, in 



68 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 

their degree, followed the Apology, and the Sraalcald Ar- 
ticles, polemically dealing with Eomish perversions and 
contradictions ; and then the Form of Concord, to dispose 
of the internal disputes which troubled the Keformation 
itself. Many of the sublimest reminiscences of Protest- 
antism pertain to the history of the Lutheran Church. 

The first successful attempt to reform the corrupt Church 
of the Middle Ages was made by the Lutherans. There 
were reformers before Luther, but there was no effective 
reformation, except that which he led. Those ninety-five 
Theses, nailed to the door of the Church of All Saints at 
Wittenberg, on the morning of the 31st of October, 1517; 
the seventeen Articles of Torgau, prepared by his hand in 
obedience to the command of one of the most praiseworthy 
of rulers ; the magnificent protest of the Lutheran princes 
at the Diet of Spires ; and the triumphant Confession of 
Augsburg, along with the hymns and sermons, transla- 
tions, and other writings of Luther and his associates, 
must ever be acknowledged as the first effective disclosure 
to modern nations of those ancient and undying truths 
which make up the real essence of Christianity. Luther 
found the Bible chained in the cloister, and he was the 
first, in modern times, to break its fetters, and to set it 
free. He himself translated it into the common language 
of the people, in a version which stands to this day as the 
best extant, which has largely formed the basis and led 
the way for all subsequent translations, and which laid at 
once the foundations of Protestantism and German litera- 
ture—the ruling religion and literature of the earth. 

It is also claimed that the Lutheran Church, by her 
Confessions and masters in theology, has, either directly 
or indirectly, given to all orthodox Christendom its Creed. 
As remarked by one of her doctors: "The Augsburg 
Confession has been substantially inwrought into all the 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 69 

subsequent evangelical symbols, both in and out of Ger- 
many; and, in the opposition which it provoked, even 
determined the decisions of the Council of Trent." 

To Luther, and the Reformation he conducted, under 
God, are modern freemen also indebted for the privilege 
of thinking, believing and worshipping, as conscience and 
Scripture may direct, without danger of being burned for 
blasphemy, or having their bones broken for heresy. When 
Luther stood before the august Diet of Worms on trial 
for his faith, the liberties of the world trembled in his brave 
heart. And when he lifted up his hand before God, in 
the face of all Europe's potentates, and declared in solemn 
oath that, unless convinced by clear testimonies of holy 
Scripture and solid reasons, he could not and would not 
retract, modern freedom drew its first breath, and inde- 
pendence sent its life -current through the arteries of 
man. 

A Romish writer bears witness, that " Luther has been 
the restorer of liberty in modern times that " if he did 
not create, he at least courageously affixed his signature to 
that great revolution, which rendered the right of exami- 
nation lawful in Europe;" and that "if we at this day 
exercise, in all its plenitude, this first and highest privi- 
lege of human intelligence, it is to him we are mostly in- 
debted for it." 

Nor is the Lutheran Church any less distinguished for 
her patronage of learning, and her contributions to theol- 
ogy and science, than in the particulars just cited. Her 
literature is the richest in the world. "The Romish 
Church," says Lange, "is the Church of priests; the 
Lutheran Church is the Church of Theologians." Her 
universities have been the glory of Germany for the last 
three hundred years ; and her critics and religious teachers 
have been the leading instructors of Christendom from 
the days of Luther until now. 



70 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 

These Churches of the Augsburg Confession generally 
have connected Avith them the name of Luther, and are 
often called Lutherans, or Lutheran Churches. This title 
was first applied by Eomanists, as an expression of disre- 
spect and derision. It is no part of the proper designa- 
tion of these Churches. As a party name, over against 
the proper historical Church, they protest against it, and 
reject it. They claim to be simply the Evangelical 
Church, as distinguished from a church which rests upon 
tradition, popes, or human idiosyncrasies. Luther was 
wholly unwilling to have his name used as a sectarian 
watchword. I beg," says he, ''that my name may be 
passed in silence, and that people call themselves not 
Lutherans, but Christians. Who is Luther ? * The doc- 
trine is not mine ; I have not been crucified for any one. 
Why, then, should the children of Christ take the unhal- 
lowed name of a frail, vile mortal like me ? Do it not ; 
let us put away party names, and bear the name of Christ, 
whose doctrine we hold." 

And yet, there is a sense in which the name of Luther 
is significant and dear. Being historically associated with 
the restoration of the pure Gospel, and the exode of the 
Church of Christ from its bondage under popery and su- 
perstition, Lutherans feel that they cannot entirely dis- 
card it. With the pious George, the Margrave of Bran- 
denburg, they say, " We were not baptized in the name 
of Luther. He is not our God and Saviour. We do not 
rest our faith in him. And, therefore, in this sense, we 
are no Lutherans. But if it be asked whether, with heart 
and lips, w^e profess the doctrines which God restored to 
lio-ht th rough the instrumentality of his blessed servant, 
Dr. Martin Luther, we neither hesitate, nor are w^e 
ashamed to call ourselves Lutherans. In this sense we 
are, and while we live, will remain Lutherans.^^ 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHUE-CH. 71 

The great cardinal principles of the Lutheran Church 
are thus summed up by one of its writers : 

1. An open Bible, man^s only guide to heaven; as elo- 
quently affirmed in the Formula of Concord, where it is 
said : " We receive and adopt, with all the heart, the pro- 
phetic and apostolic writings of the Old and New Testa- 
ments, as the clear and pure fountains of Israel; and 
hold, that these sacred Scriptures alone are the true and 
infallible rule by which all teachers and doctrines are to 
be tried and judged.'^ 

2. Private judgment, man^s inalienable birthright ; as so 
thrillingly asserted by Luther before the Diet of Worms, 
and so vigorously re-echoed in the Protest of the Princes 
at the Diet of Spires. 

3. Christ and Him crucified, man's only Saviour; as 
unequivocally affirmed and taught in all the Symbols and 
accepted theologians of the Church, which never cease to 
refer to Christ as true God and true man in one Person, 
who is " the only Propitiator and Mediator ordained be- 
tween God and man, the only Saviour, the only High 
Priest and Advocate before God." 

4. Faith in Christ, man's only availing righteousness ; as 
everywhere declared by the Lutheran Symbols, " that we 
cannot obtain forgiveness of sins and righteousness before 
God through our strength, merits and works ; but that we 
are pardoned and justified gratuitously for Christ's sake 
through faith " that faith is the sole medium and in- 
strument by which we apprehend Christ and that " this 
faith is not a bare historic knowledge of Christ, but a 
divine gift, by which we truly apprehend Christ our Re- 
deemer, as presented in the Gospel message, and trust in 
him, for the sake of whose righteousness alone our sins 
are graciously forgiven, we are justified before God the 
Father, and entitled to expect eternal salvation.'' 



72 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 

The Lutheran Church has but few special peculiarities. 
It is presented as her chief characteristic that she aims at 
exhibiting a full, rotund, and complete Christianity, in a 
form in all directions true to the word and appointments 
of its Divine Author, and conformed to the common ne- 
cessities of man, in all ages, in all places, and in all cir- 
cumstances. 

One of her authors says of her : " Taking the deepest 
and broadest foundations of the Christian religion, and 
working ever from its inner essence and spirit, there is 
nothing good or praiseworthy in faith or practice which 
does not harmonize with her, or which may not be realized 
as her own proper fruit. She held and taught a sovereign 
salvation, by grace only, before Calvin was freed from the 
shackles of papal superstition. She confessed and be- 
lieved that Jesus Christ tasted death for every man, be- 
fore Arminius was born. She approved and practiced the 
holding of meetings for prayer and mutual edification, be- 
fore there was a Wesley, or any followers of his method. 
She had her Liturgies and forms of devotion, — the models 
and sources of the best that have followed, — when Eng- 
land was yet in the arms of the papacy, and the English 
Book of Common Prayer had not been thought of. She 
had her bishops before there were any Episcopalians, so- 
ealled, though ever denying that diocesan Episcopacy is at 
all necessary to the integrity of the Church. In govern- 
ment, she prescribes for the pure preaching of the Word, 
and the administration of the Sacraments according to 
that Word, but leaves all questions of outward forms to 
be regulated as the circumstances may render most con- 
venient or desirable. And in all things she is as many- 
sided as the graces of the Holy Spirit, or the glorious 
character of her Lord. 

" Her name is Evaiir/dical, and her office in the world 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 73 

is Evangelization, according to Christ's own word and 
commandments. In fulfillment of this office, she ap- 
proaches men, while yet in the helplessness of infancy, and 
marks them with God's token and seal of mercy in the 
Holy Sacrament of Baptism, teaching that ^ children are 
thereby consecrated to God, and received into His favor ;' — 
gathers them into classes and schools for instruction in 
the things of faith and piety as their minds unfold, — and, 
as soon as the evidences of fitness appear, introduces them 
into full fellowship and communion by the solemn rite of 
Confirmation. She builds sanctuaries, and delights in 
ornamenting and embellishing them w^th every pure art, 
for the honor and glory of God, and educates her young 
men of suitable gifts and spiritual graces, to serve in them 
as pastors and teachers, whom she solemnly and officially 
Bets apart for their office by laying on of hands and prayer. 
She sets forward her pulpits, and the preaching of the 
Word, as the great central and divinely-instituted power 
of the Gospel. She puts * psalms and hymns and spir- 
itual songs' into the lips of her people, to strengthen 
their faith, exercise their devotional feelings, and refresh 
their souls. She calls upon all her members, at convenient 
intervals, to renew their profession at the sacred altar of 
that one sacrifice of our Lord, of which it is the privilege 
of men to participate in the Holy Supper. She watches 
over them with a godly and merciful discipline and ma- 
ternal solicitude while they live. And, finally, when their 
race is run," she lays their bodies down with solemn care 
in the house of the dead, — ^ earth to earth, ashes to ashes, 
dust to dust' — looking for the resurrection of the last 
day, and the life of the world to come, through our Lord 
Jesus Christ. And whatever on earth can contribute to 
the furtherance or establishment of the doctrine and truth 
of God, among the civilized or savage, at home or abroad, 
7 



74 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 

;ind whatever may add to the true comfort and peace of 
man, she always lays hold of as an instrument for her 
^ervice, and sanctifies it unto the Lord. 

" She claims, that the Gospel can live and flourish in 
connection with the State, ^\ith all the embarrassments 
which such an unnatural relation entails, and that it can 
live and flourish in entire separation from it. She con- 
sents to all established government, whether despotic and 
monarchical, or free and republican, as lawful, and, for the 
end of government, an ordinance of God, to be obeyed in 
all matters not touching the direct obligations of con- 
science to the great Judge of all, as a part of every 
Christian's duty. She proclaims in her principal Confes- 
sion, ' that Christians may hold either legislative, judicial 
or executive offices without sin ; may decide causes, pro- 
nounce judgments, and punish transgressors, agreeably to 
imperial or other established laws; may wage just wars, 
and serve in them, make lawful contracts, take oaths when 
required, hold property, marry, and be married.' She 
stringently denies that a higher holiness is to be obtained 
by an abandonment of the ordinary stations, relations and 
duties of life, or that God cannot be as well and purely 
served in them as in separation from them. Nor does she 
suppose that the true Church of Jesus Christ has ceased 
to be, where imperfect or spurious members may be found 
among the confessors of his name." 

In agreement with this, it was the remark of an Epis- 
copal clergyman, respecting the Lutheran Church, that 

breathes the free spirit of Luther, and the mild spirit of 
Melancthon f occupying the ground of a great mediator 
for the truth between many conflicting parties. It is 
claimed that she has successfully laid a doctrinal, litur- 
gical, and government basis, which leaves no possible ex- 
cuse lor sccLarianism ; - that the Episcopalian can come into 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 75 



her communion, and yet feel that he has in no way de- 
parted from the Church, and find much more solid and 
unequivocal instruction than his own standards contain; 
that the Dissenter may worship at her altars, without be- 
ing oppressed and outraged with rigid, weakening, corrupt, 
or invariable forms, and yet come into much closer and 
wholesome contact with the proper Church ; that the Pres- 
byterian may hear of her preachers his favorite theme of 
sovereign grace, freed from the repulsive and questionable 
forms and inferences with which his Confession accom- 
panies it, and learn lessons concerning the Sacraments 
about which he is too much in the dark ; that the Metho- 
dist may find food in her pastures to give consistency to 
his fervor, and in her treasures the original sources of 
what he most admires in Wesley, without the unchurch- 
liness and one-sided subjectivism with which he is some- 
times reproached ; that for all men, there is not on earth 
a more reliable, well-tried and satisfactory guide to the 
full truth, a sanctified life, and everlasting salvation, than 
that which is presented in the Evangelical Lutheran 
Church, wherever she is properly herself ; that what she 
demands, is what no one may neglect or despise without 
danger to his soul ; and that in nothing does she so 
heartily rejoice, as in the triumph of the simple truth as 
it is in Jesus, unwilted by sectarian bigotries, and unmu- 
tilated by the proud presumptuous hand of rationalizing 
philosophy, or by the enervations of a mistaken liberalism. 

The Lutheran Church accordingly claims to be Catholic 
and not sectarian. The only notes and marks which she 
finds for the Church properly so called, are " the pure and 
sound doctrine of the Gospel, and the right use of the 
Sacraments." It is part of her Confession, that, " for the 
true unity of the Christian Church, it is not necessary 
that uniform ceremonies, instituted by men, should be 



76 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 

everywhere observed." All that she requires on tins 
point is, that the saying of Paul, Eph. iv. 4, 5, be re^ 
alized : One body and one Spirit, even as ye are called 
in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one Faith, one 
Baptism." As expressed by the Wurtemburg Confessors, 
"We think that men are to judge by the authority, both 
of the Holy Scripture and of the ancient fathers, that the 
true Catholic and Apostolic Church is not tied to one cer- 
tain place or nation. Where the Gospel of Christ is sin- 
cerely preached, and His sacraments rightly administered 
according to his institution, where the Word of God is 
preached, and where the Gospel is acknowledged by faith, 
there God hath his Church, wherein he is effectual unto 
eternal life." 

The Lutherans do not claim that theirs is the only true 
Church. In the Apology of their chief Confession, it is 
said : " We affirm, and know in truth, that there are chil- 
dren of God scattered throughout all the world, in vari- 
ous kingdoms, islands, countries and cities, from the rising 
to the setting of the sun, wdio truly know Christ and the 
Gospel. . . And although among those built upon the 
right foundation, that is, on Christ and the faith, there 
are many weak ones, who build upon this foundation 
wood, hay and stubble, that is, certain human conceits 
and opinions, nevertheless, as they do not thereby over- 
throw or thrust aside the foundation, Christ, they are still 
Christians, and may be forgiven such defects. . . Thus 
even the Fathers sometimes build hay and stubble upon 
the foundation, not intending, however, thereby to over- 
throw it. . . Hence, we conclude, according to the Scrip- 
tures, that the true Christian Church is the company of 
those, throughout all the world, who really believe the 
Gospel of Christ, and have the gift of the Holy Ghost. . . 
\Vc may be pious, holy and just, the children of God and 



THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH. 77 

Christians, without observing the same ceremonies that 
are in use in other Churches. . . People can be in the 
Church of Christ even though they do not wear German 
or French garments." 

The Lutheran Church has her Church-year, in harmony 
with the Ancient Churches, in which she seeks to re- 
flect, in her computation of times and seasons, the course 
and progress of sal va/ ion both in the acts of Jesus and in 
the renewal of the soul and life. She has her appointed 
festivals of her Saviour's birth, and of the showing forth 
of his grace and power. She has her fixed period for 
coming into special sympathy with his great humiliation 
and passion, in taking her guilt upon him, and making 
himself an offering for her sins. She has her allotted 
days for the glad commemoration of his triumphant res^ 
urrection and ascension, and of the outpouring of the 
Holy Ghost in fulfillment of his gracious promises. She 
has her time for the special celebration of the adorable 
Trinity and the attributes of a life fully consecrated to 
Him. She does not canonize or worship saints, but re- 
members those whose faith she is to follow, and such as 
have by their lives and labors illustrated the way of holi- 
ness, and left the impress of their good deeds upon the 
world. She has her regular Pericopes, or Lessons of 
Holy Scripture, designated for every week, and for the 
special celebration of each great fact by which salvation 
was achieved, and on which the faith of the Church re- 
poses. Leaving the Jewish Sabbath as no longer binding 
in its ancient form, she follows the example of the Apos- 
tles and the early Church, in setting apart the first day of 
the week as holy unto the Lord, in which secular em- 
ployments and cares are to be laid aside, and God, His 
word, and His worship made to occupy and fill the atten- 
tion. And in all these things she seeks to exemplify and 
7* 



78 THE EVANGELICAL LUTHEEAN CHURCH. 

perpetuate a living and true Christianity, first of all ful- 
filling what Christ has commanded and enjoined, and 
then conforming to the truest, best, and most wholesome 
convictions and developments of the Church itself in the 
purest periods of its history and worthiest portions from 
the beginning onward. 

In some of those States in which Lutheranism is the 
State Church there prevailed within the past century an 
amount of rationalism and indifference to vital piety which 
did much to bring this venerable denomination into dis- 
repute ; and in some instances there grew out of this a 
persecuting spirit which was the reproach of Protestant 
Christianity. It is cause for devout thankfulness that both 
these evils are fast passing away, and that the Church of 
Luther will soon possess once more Luther's reverent and 
devotional spirit as well as his love for all who bear the 
Saviour's impress. The great uprising in the Lutheran 
Church in Germany to throw off the rationalism which 
was sapping its life ; the noble development of the philan- 
thropic and missionary spirit under the lead of such men 
as Wichern, Fliedner and Harms; the decided stand of the 
present and late Swedish kings against persecution ; and 
the warm-heartedness and devotional spirit of the Lu- 
theran members of the Evangelical Alliance at its late 
session in New York, — all indicate a restoration of Lu- 
ther's glowing piety. 

In the United States, divisions have been healed, and 
the evangelical spirit has been felt in all sections. The 
immigration of Germans, Swedes, Norwegians and Danes 
has greatly enlarged the membership and adherent popu- 
lation of the Lutheran Church, and with this increase of 
power there have come earnest efforts for greater usefulness. 

In the United States, the Lutheran Church stands 
fourth . in the list of denominations ; the Baptists, Metho- 
dists and Presbyterians alone exceeding the Lutherans in 



METHODISTS. 



79 



numbers. It embraces fifty-one synods, five general or- 
ganizations, and 528,639 communicants. It has (1874) 
fifteen theological seminaries, sixteen colleges, eleven gene- 
ral benevolent institutions, seventeen academies, eight 
female seminaries, twenty-seven charitable institutions and 
forty-six regular periodicals. Among its living theologians 
are, Drs. C. F. and C. W. Schaeffer, W. J. Mann, C. P. 
Krauth and J. A. Seiss, of Philadelphia ; Drs. J. A. Brown 
and M. Valentine, of Gettysburg ; Drs. G. F. Krotel and H. 
I. Schmidt, of New York ; Dr. J. G. Morris, of Baltimore ; 
Dr. F. A. Muhlenberg, of Allentown, Dr. W. A. Passa- 
vant, of Pittsburg, and Dr. E. G. Green wald, of Lancaster, 
Pa. ; Dr. C. F. Walther, of St. Louis, Mo. ; Dr. Bittle, ot 
Salem, Va., and Dr. A. E. Eude, of Columbia, S. C. 



METHODISTS. 

It is not generally known that the name of Methodist 
had been given long before to a religious sect in England, 
or, at least, to a party in religion which was distinguished 
by some of the same marks as are now supposed to apply 
to the Methodists. John Spence, who was librarian of 
Sion College in 1657, in a book which he published, says, 
" ¥/'here are now our Anabaptists and plain pikestaff Me- 
thodists, who esteem all flowers of rhetoric in sermons no 
better than stinking weeds?" But the denomination to 
which we here refer was founded in the year 1729, by one 
Mr. Morgan and Mr. John Wesley. In the month of 
November that year, the latter, being then fellow of Lin- 
coln College, began to spend some evenings in reading the 
Greek Testament with Charles Wesley, student, Mr. Mor- 
gan, commoner of Christ Church, and Mr. Kirkham, of 
Merton College. Not long afterwards, two or three of tlia 



80 



METHODISTS. 



pupils of Mr. Jolin Wesley obtained leave to attend these 
meetings. They then began to visit the sick in different 
parts of the town, and the prisoners also, who were con- 
fined in the castle. Two years after they were joined by 
Mr. Ingham, of Queen's College, Mr. Broughton, and Mr. 
Ilervey ; and in 1735 by the celebrated Mr. Whitfield, 
then in his eighteenth year. At this time their number in 
Oxford amounted to about fourteen. They obtained their 
name from the exact regularity of their lives, which gave 
occasion to a young gentleman of Christ Church to say, 

Here is a new sect of Methodists sprung up ! " alluding 
to a sect of ancient physicians who were called Methodists, 
because they reduced the Avhole healing art to a few com- 
mon principles, and brought it into some method and order. 

At the time that this society was formed, it is said that 
the whole kingdom of England was tending fast to infi- 
delity. "It is come," says Bishop Butler, "I know not 
how, to be taken for granted by many persons that Chris- 
tianity is not so much as a subject of inquiry; but that it 
is now at length discovered to be fictitious ; and accord- 
ingly they treat it as if, in the present age, this were an 
agreement among all people of discernment, and nothing 
remained but to set it up as a principal subject of mirth 
and ridicule, as it were, by way of reprisals for its having 
BO long interrupted the pleasures of the world." There is 
every reason to believe that the Methodists were the in- 
struments of stemming this torrent. The sick and the 
poor also tasted the fruits of their labors and benevolence. 
Mr. Wesley abridged himself of all his superfluities, and 
proposed a fund for the relief of the indigent; and so 
prosperous was the scheme, that they quickly increased 
tlicir fund to eighty pounds per annum. This, which one 
Bhould liave thought would have been attended with praise 
instead of censure, quickly drew upon them a kind of per- 



METHODISTS. 



81 



secution ; some of the seniors of the university began tc 
interfere, and it was reported " that the college censors 
were going to blow up the godly club.'* They found them 
selves, however, patronized and encouraged by some men 
eminent for their learning and virtue ; so that the society 
still continued, though they had suffered a severe loss, in 
1730, by the death of Mr. Morgan, who, it is said, was the 
founder of it. In October, 1735, John and Charles Wes- 
ley, Mr. Ingham, and Mr. Delamotte, son of a merchant 
in London, embarked for Georgia, in order to preach the 
gospel to the Indians. After their arrival they were at 
first favorably received, but in a short time lost the affec- 
tion of the people ; and, on account of some differences 
with the storekeeper, Mr. Wesley was obliged to return to 
England. Mr. Vf esley, however, was soon succeeded by 
Mr. Whitfield, whose repeated labors in that part of tl^e 
world are well known. 

After Mr. Whitfield returned from America in 1741, he 
declared- his full assent to the doctrines of Calvin. Mr. 
Wesley, on the contrary, professed the 4-i*i^inian doctrine, 
and had printed in favor of perfection and universal re- 
demption, and very strongly against election — a doctrine 
which Mr. Whitfield believed to be scriptural. The differ- 
ence, therefore, of sentiments between these two great 
men, caused a separation. Mr. Wesley preached in a place 
called the Foundry, where Mr. Whitfield preached but 
once, and no more. Mr. Whitfield then preached to very 
large congregations out of doors^ and soon after, in con- 
nection with Mr. Cennick, and ono or two more, began a 
new house in Kingswood, Gloucestershire, and established 
a school that favored Calvinistic preachers. The Method 
ists, therefore, were now divided ; one part following Mr. 
Wesley, and the other Mr. Whitfield. 

Tiie doctrines of the Wesley an Methodists, according to 

F 



82 



METHODISTS. 



tlieir own account, are tlie sa.me as the Churcli of England, 
as set forth in her liturgy, articles, and homilies. This, 
however, has been disputed. Mr. Wesley, in his appeal to 
men of reason and religion, thus declares his sentiments : 
"All I teach," he observes, "respects either the nature 
and condition of justification, the nature and condition of 
salvation, the nature of justifying and saving faith, or the 
Author of faith and salvation. That justification whereof 
our articles and homilies speak signifies present forgive- 
ness, and consequently acceptance with God : I believe 
the condition of this is faith : I mean not only that with- 
out faith we cannot be justified, but also that, as soon as 
any one has true faith, in that moment he is justified. 
Good works follow this faith, but cannot go before it ; 
much less can sanctification, which implies a continued 
course of good works, springing from holiness of heart. 
But it is allowed that sanctification goes before our justi- 
fication at the last day, Heb. xii. 14. Repentance, and 
fruits meet for repentance, go before faith. Repentance 
absolutely must go before faith ; fruits meet for it, if there 
be opportunity. By repentance I mean conviction of sin, 
producing real desires and sincere resolutions of amend- 
ment ; by salvation, I mean not barely deliverance from 
hell, but a present deliverance from sin. Faith, in gene- 
ral, is a divine supernatural evidence, or conviction of 
tilings not seen, not discoverable by our bodily senses : 
justifying faith implies not only a divine evidence or con- 
viction that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto 
himself, but a sure trust and confidence that Christ died 
for my sins, that he loved me, and gave himself for me. 
And the moment a penitent sinner believes this, God par- 
dons and absolves him ; and as soon as his pardon or justi- 
fication is witnessed to him by the Holy Ghost, he is saved 



METHODISTS. 



83 



From that time (unless he make shipwreck of the faith) 
salvation gradually increases in his soul. 

" The Author of faith and salvation is God alone. 
There is no more of power than of merit in man ; but as 
all merit is in the Son of God, in what he has done and 
Buffered for us, so all power is in the Spirit of God. And, 
therefore, every man, in order to believe unto salvation, 
must receive the Holy Ghost." So far Mr. Wesley. Re 
specting original sin, free will, the justification of men, 
good works, and works done before justification, he refers 
us to what is said on these subjects in the former part of 
the ninth, the tenth, the eleventh, the twelfth, and thir- 
teenth articles of the Church of England. One of Mr. 
Wesley's preachers bears this testimony of him and his 
Bcntiments: "The gospel, considered as a general plan of 
salvation, he viewed as a display of the divine perfections, 
in a way agreeable to the nature of God ; in which all the 
divine attributes harmonize, and shine forth with peculiar 
lustre. The gospel, considered as a means to attain an 
end, appeared to him to discover as great fitness in the 
means to the end as can possibly be discovered in the 
structure of natural bodies, or in the various operations of 
nature, from a view of which we draw our arguments for 
the existence of God. Man he viewed as blind, ignorant, 
wandering out of the way, with his mind estranged from 
Go 1. He considered the gospel as a dispensation of 
mercy to men, holding forth pardon, a free pardon of sin 
to all who repent and believe in Christ Jesus. The gos- 
pel, he believed, inculcates universal holiness both in heart 
and in the conduct of life. He showed a mind well in- 
structed in the oracles of God, and well acquainted with 
li'uman nature. He contended that the first step to be a 
Christian is to repent; and that, till a man is convinced 
of the evil of sin, and is determined to depart from it ; 



84 



METHODISTS. 



till he is convinced tliat there is a beauty in holiness, and 
something truly desirable in being reconciled to God, he is 
not prepared to receive Christ. The second important and 
necessary step, he believed to be faith, agreeable to the 
order of the apostle, ' Repentance toward God, and faith 
toward our Lord Jesus Christ,' Acts xx. 20, 21. In ex- 
plaining sanctification, he accurately distinguished it from 
justification, or the pardon of sin. Justification admits 
us into a state of grace and favor with GKd, and lays the 
foundation of sanctification, or Christian holiness, in all its 
extent. There has been a great clamr>T raised against him 
because he called his view of sanctification by the word 
perfection ; but he often explained what he meant by this 
term. He meant by the Yiord perfection, such a degree 
of the love of God, and the love of man ; such a degree 
of the love of justice, truth, holiness, and purity, as will 
remove from the heart every contrary disposition towards 
God or man ; and that this should be our state of mind in 
every situation, and in every circumstance of life. He 
maintained that God is a God of love, not to a part of his 
creatures only, but to all ; that He who is the Father of 
all, who made all, who stands in the same relation to all 
his creatures, loves them all; that He loved the world, 
and gave his Son a ransom for all without distinction of 
persons. It appeared to him, that to represent God as 
partial, as confining his love to a few, was unworthy oui 
notions of the Deity. He maintained that Christ died for 
all men ; that he is to be offered to all ; that all are to be 
invited to come to him ; and that whosoever comes in the 
way which God has appointed, may partake of his bless- 
ings. He supposed that sufficient grace is given to all, in 
that way and manner which is best adapted to influence 
the mind. He did not believe salvation was by works. So 
far was he from putting works in the place of the blood of 



METHODISTS. 



85 



Christ, that lie only gave them their just value : he consi- 
dered them as the fruits of a living, operative faith, and 
as the measure of our future reward ; for every man will 
be rewarded not for his works, but according to the mea- 
sure of them. He gave the whole glory of salvation to 
God from first to last. He believed that man would never 
turn to God, if God did not begin the work : he often said 
that the first approaches of grace to the mind are irresist- 
ible ; that is, that a man cannot avoid being convinced 
that he is a sinner ; that God, by various means, awakens 
his conscience ; and, whether the man will or no, these 
convictions approach him." In order that we may form 
still clearer ideas respecting Mr. Wesley's opinions, we 
shall here quote a few questions and answers as laid down 
in the Minutes of Conference, Q. "In what sense is 
Adam's sin imputed to all mankind ? " A. " In Adam all 
die, ^. 1. Our bodies then became mortal. 2. Our souls 
died, {. e., were disunited from God. And hence, 3. We 
are all born with a sinful, devilish nature ; by reason 
whereof, 4. We are children of wrath, liable to death 
eternal," Rom. v. 18; Eph. ii. 3. Q. "In what sense is 
the righteousness of Christ imputed to all mankind, or to 
believers ? " A. " We do not find it expressly affirmed in 
Scripture that God imparts the righteousness of Christ to 
any, although we do find that faith is imputed for right 
eousness. That text, ^As by one man's disobedience all 
men were made sinners, so by the obedience of one all 
were made righteous,' we conceive, means by the merits of 
Christ all men are cleared from the guilt of Adam's actual 
sin." Q. " Can faith be lost but through disobedience ?' 
A. " It cannot. A believer first inwardly disobeys ; in- 
clines to sin with his heart ; then his intercourse with God 
is cut off, i. e. his faith is lost ; and after this he may fall 
into rutward sin, being now weak, and like another man." 

8 



86 



METH OVISTS. 



Q. What is implied in being a perfect Christian A. 
*^ The loving the Lord our God with all our heart, and with 
all our mind, and soul, and strength." Q. "Does this 
imply that all inward sin is taken away?" A. "Without 
doubt ; or how could we be said to be saved from all our 
uneleanness P " Ezek. xxxvL 29. Q. " How much is al- 
lowed by our brethren who differ from us with regard to 
entire sanetification f " A. "They grant, 1. That every 
one must be entirely sanctified in the article of death. 2. 
That till then a believer daily grows in grace, comes nearer 
and nearer to perfection. 3. That we ought to be conti- 
nually pressing after this, and to exhort all others to do 
BO." Q. " What do we allow them ?" A. " We grant, 1. 
That many of those who have died in the faith, yea, the 
greater part of those we have known, were not sanctified 
throughout, not made perfect in love, till a little before 
death. 2. That the term sanctified is continually applied 
by St. Paul to all that were justified, that were true be- 
lievers. 3. That by this term alone he rarely (if ever) 
means saved from all sin. 4. That consequently it is not 
proper to use it in this sense, without adding the word 
'wholly, entirely,' or the like. 5. That the inspired wri- 
ters almost continually speak of or to those who were just- 
ified, but very rarely either of or to those who were sanc- 
tified. 6. That it consequently behoves us to speak in 
public almost continually of the state of justification ; but 
more rarely in full and explicit terms concerning entire 
Banctification." Q. "What, then, is the point wherein we 
divide?" A. "It is this: Whether we should expect to 
be saved from all sin before the article of death." Q. " la 
there any clear Scripture promise of this, that God will 
save us from all sin ? " A. " There is. Ps. cxxx, 8 : * He 
shall redeem Israel from all his iniquities.* This is more 
largely expressed in Ezek. xxxvi. 25, 29 ; 2 Cor. vii. 1 ; 



METHODISTS. 



87 



Deut. XXX. 6 ; 1 John iii. 8 ; Eph. v. 25, 27 ; John xvii. 
20, 23; 1 John iv. 17." 

These are the tenets of the Wesleyan Methodists, given 
in their own words, in order to prevent misrepresentation. 

The doctrine of the Calvinistic Methodists are those of 
Calvin. 

A considerable number both of the Calvinist and Ar- 
minian Methodists approve of the discipline of the Church 
of England, while many, it is said, are dissenters in prin- 
ciple. Mr. Wesley and Mr. Whitfield were both brought 
up in, and paid peculiar respect to that Church. They 
did not, however, as it is well known, confine themselves 
to her laws in all respects as it related to discipline. 

Mr. Wesley having formed numerous societies in different 
parts, he, with his brother Charles, drew up certain rules, 
hj which they were, and it seems in many respects still 
are, governed. They state the nature and design of a 
Methodist society in the following words : 

" Such a society is no other than a company of men 
having the form and seeking the power of godliness ; 
united in order to pray together, to receive the word of 
exhortation, and to watch over one another in love, that 
they may help each other to work out their own salvation. 

" That it may the more easily be discerned whether 
they are indeed working out their own salvation, each 
society is divided into smaller companies, called classes, 
according to their respective places of abode. There are 
about twelve persons (sometimes fifteen, twenty, or even 
more) in each class ; one of whom is styled their leader. 
It is his business, 1. To see each person in his class once 
a week, at least, in order to inquire how their souls pros- 
per; to advise, reprove, comfort, or exhort, as occasion 
may require ; to receive what they are willing to give to 
the poor or toward the gospel — 2. To meet the minister 



88 



METHODISTS. 



and the stewards of the society once a week, in order to 
inform the minister of any that are sick, or of any that 
walk disorderly and will not be reproved ; to pay to the 
stewards what they have received of their several classes 
in the week preceding ; and to show their account of what 
each person has contributed. 

" There is only one condition previously required of 
those who desire admission into these societies : namely, a 
desire to flee from the wrath to come; to he saved from 
their sins : but wherever this is really fixed in the soul, it 
will be shown by its fruits. It is, therefore, expected of 
all who continue therein, that they should continue to evi- 
dence their desire of salvation. 

" First, By doing no harm ; by avoiding evil in every 
kind ; especially that which is most generally practised, 
such as the taking the name of God in vain ; the profaning 
the day of the Lord, either by doing ordinary work there- 
on, or by buying or selling ; drunkenness ; buying or sell- 
ing spirituous liquors^ or drinking them, unless in cases 
of extreme necessity; fighting, quarrelling, brawling; 
brother going to laiv with brother ; returning evil for evil, 
or railing for railing ; the using many words in buying or 
selling; the huying or selling uncustomed goods; the 
giving or taking things on usury ^ i. e. unlawful interest. 

Uncharitable or unprofitable conversation; particu- 
larly, speaiing evil of magistrates or of ministers. 

"Doing to others as we would not they should do 
unto us. 

" Doing what we know is not for the glory of God ; as 
the puttijig on gold or costly apiparel ; the tahing smh 
diversions as cannot be used in the name of the Lord 
Jesus. 

" The singing those songs, or reading those boohs, which 
do not tend to the knowledge or love of God; softness and 



METHODISTS. 



89 



needless pelf-indulgence ; laying up treasure upoi) earth ; 
borrowing without a probability of paying ; or taking up 
goods without a probability of paying for them. 

"It is expected of all who continue in these societiei 
that they should continue to evidence their desire of 
salvation, 

Secondly, By doing good ; by being in every kind mer- 
ciful after their power, as they have opportunity ; doing 
good of every possible sort, and as far as possible to all 
men : to their bodies, of the ability which God giveth ; by 
giving food to the hungry, by clothing the naked, by visit- 
ing or helping them that are sick, or in prison ; to their 
souls, by instructing, reproving, or exhorting all we have 
any intercourse with ; trampling under foot that enthusi- 
astic doctrine of devils, that 'We are not to do good, 
unless our hearts he free to it.' 

" By doing good, especially to them that are of the 
household of faith, or groaning so to be ; employing them 
preferably to others ; buying one of another ; helping each 
other in business ; and so much the more, because the 
world will love its own, and them only ; by all possible 
diligence and frugality, that the gospel be not blamed ; by 
running with patience the race set before them, denying 
themselves and taking up their cross daily ; submitting to 
bear the reproach of Christ; to be as the filth and off- 
Bcouring of the world, and looking that men should say all 
manner of evil of thera falsely for the Lord's sake, 

" It is expected of all who desire to continue in these 
societies, that they should continue to evidence their desire 
of salvation. 

" Thirdly, By attending on all the ordinances of God : 
such are — The public worship of God ; the ministry of 
the word, either read or expounded; the supper of tho 

8* 



90 



METHODISTS. 



Lord; family and private prayer; searching the Scrip- 
tures ; and fasting and abstinence. 

" These are the general rules of our societies, all which 
we are taught of God to observe, even in his written word : 
the only true rule, and the sufficient rule, both of our faith 
and practice ; and all these we know his Spirit writes on 
every truly awakened heart. If there be any among us 
who observe them not, who habitually break any of them, 
let it be made known unto them who watch over that soul, 
as they who must give an account. We will admonish 
him of the error of his ways ; we will bear with him for a 
season ; but then, if he repent not,, he hath no more place 
among us : we have delivered our own souls. 

^'May 1, 1743. John Wesley. 

Charles Wesley." 

In Mr. Wesley's connection, they have circuits and 
conferences, which we find were thus formed : — When the 
preachers at first went out to exhort and preach, it was by 
Mr. Wesley's permission and direction ; some from one 
part of the kingdom, and some from another; and, though 
frequently strangers to each other, and those to whom 
they were sent, yet on his credit and sanction alone they 
were received and provided for as friends by the societies 
wherever they came. But having little or no communica- 
tion or intercourse with one another, nor any subordination 
among themselves, they must have been under the neces- 
sity of recurring to Mr. Wesley for directions how and 
where they were to labor. To remedy this inconvenience, 
he conceived the design of calling them together to an 
annual conference ; by this means he brought them into 
closer union with each other, and made them sensible of 
the utility of acting in concert and harmony. He soon 
found it necessary, also, to bring their itinerancy under 



METHODISTS. 



91 



certain regulations, and reduce it to some fixed order, both 
to prevent confusion, and for his own ease ; he therefore 
took fifteen or twenty societies, more or less, which lay 
round some principal society in those parts, and which 
were so situated that the greatest distance from one to 
another was not much more than twenty miles, and united 
them into what was called a circuit. * At the yearly con^ 
ference, he appointed two, three, or four preachers to one 
of these circuits, according to its extent, which at first was 
very often considerable, sometimes taking in a part of 
three or four counties. Here, and here only, were they to 
labor for one year, that is, until the next conference. One 
of the preachers on every circuit was called the assistant, 
because he assisted Mr. Wesley in superintending the 
societies and other preachers ; he took charge of the socie- 
ties within the limits assigned him ; he enforced the rules 
everywhere, and directed the labors of the preachers asso- 
ciated with him. Having received a list of the societies 
forming his circuit, he took his own station in it, gave to 
the other preachers a plan of it, and pointed out the day 
when each should be at the place fixed for him, to begin a 
progressive motion round it, in such order as the plan 
directed. They now followed one another through all the 
societies belonging to that circuit, at stated distances of 
time, all being governed by the same rules, and under- 
going the same labor. By this plan every preacher's daily 
work was appointed beforehand; each knew, every day, 
where the others were, and each society when to expect 
the preacher, and how long he would stay with them. — It 
may be observed, however, that Mr. Wesley's design in 
calling the preachers together annually, was not merely 
for the regulation of the circuits, but also for the review 
of their doctrines and discipline, and for the examination 
of their moral conduct ; that those who were to administer 



92 



METHODISTS. 



with him in holy things might be tlioroughly furnished 
for every good work. 

The first conference Tvas held in June, 1744, at whieb 
Mr. y/esley met his brother, two or three other clergymen, 
and a few of the preachers whom he had appointed to 
come from various parts to confer with them on the affairs 
of the societies. 

"Monday, June 25," observes Mr. Wesley, "and the 
five following days, we spent in 'conference with oui 
preachers, seriously considering by what means we might 
the most effectually save our own souls, and them that 
heard us ; and the result of our consultations we set down 
to be the rule of our future practice." 

Since that time a conference has "been held annually, 
Mr. Wesley himself having presided at forty-seven. The 
subjects of their deliberations were proposed in the form 
of questions, which were amply discussed, and the ques- 
tions with the answers, agreed upon, were afterwards 
printed under the title of "Minutes of several Conversa- 
tions between the Rev. Mr. Wesley and others," commonly 
called Minutes of Conference. 

As to their preachers, the following extract from the 
above-mentioned Minutes of Conference will show us in 
what manner they are chosen and designated : " How 
shall we try those who think they are moved by the Holy 
Ghost to preach ?" A. " Inquire, 1. Do they know God 
as a pardoning God ? Have they the love of God abiding 
in them? Do they desire and seek nothing but God? 
And are they holy in all manner of conversation? 
2. Have they gifts as well as grace for the work ? Have 
thoy, in some tolerable degree, a clear, sound understand 
ing ? Have they a right judgment in the things of God ? 
Have they a just conception of salvation by faith ? And 
Las God given them any degree of utterance? Do thoy 



METHODISTS. 



93 



speak jubtlj, readEy, clearly ? — 3. Have ihej fruit f Are 
any truly convinced of sin and converted to God by their 
preaching ? 

"As long as these three marks concur in any one, we 
believe he is called of God to preach. These we receive 
as sufficient proof that he is moved thereto hy the Holy 
Ghost. 

Q. ""What method may we use in receiving a new 
helper?" A. "A proper time for doing this is at a con- 
ference, after solemn fasting and prayer ; every person 
proposed is then to be present, and each of them may be 
asked, — 

" Have you faith in Christ ? Are you going on to per- 
fection ? Do you expect to be perfected in love in this 
life ? Are you groaning after it ? Are you resolved to 
devote yourself wholly to God and to his work ? Have 
you considered the rules of a helper f Will you keep 
them for conscience' sake ? Are you determined to em- 
ploy all your time in the work of God ? W^ill you preach 
every morning and evening? Will you diligently instruct 
the children in every place ? Yv^ilkyou visit from house to 
house ? Will you recommend fasting both by precept and 
example ? 

" We then may receive him as a probationer, by giving 
aim the Minutes of the Conference, inscribed thus : — 'To 
A. B. You think it your duty to call sinners to repent- 
ance. Make full proof hereof, and we shall rejoice to 
receive you as a fellow-laborer.' Let him then read and 
carefully weigh what is contained therein, that if he has 
any doubt it may be removed." 

" To the above it may be useful to add," says Mr, Ben- 
son, " a few remarks on the method pursued in the choice 
of the itinerant preachers, as many have formed the must 
erroneous ideas on the subject, imagining they are era- 



94 



METHODISTS. 



ployed with hardly any prior preparation. 1. They are 
received as private members of the society on trial. 2. 
After a quarter of a year, if they are found deserving, 
they are admitted as proper members. 3. When their 
grace and abilities are sufficiently manifest they are ap- 
pointed leaders of classes. 4. If they then discover 
talents for more important services, they are employed to 
exhort occasionally in the smaller congregation, when the 
preachers cannot attend. 5. If approved in this line of 
duty, they are allowed to preach. 6. Out of these men 
who are called local preacJm^s, are selected the itinerant 
preachers, who are first proposed at a quarterly meeting 
of the stewards and local preachers of the circuit ; then at 
a meeting of the travelling preachers of the district ; and 
lastly, in the conference ; and, if accepted, are nominated 
for a circuit. 7. Their characters and condupt are ex- 
amined annually in the conference ; and, if they continue 
faithful for four years of trial, they are received into full 
connection. At these conferences, also, strict inquiry is 
made into the conduct and success of every preacher, and 
those who are found deficient in abilities are no longer 
employed as itinerants ; while those whose conduct has not 
been agreeable to the Gospel, are expelled, and thereby 
deprived of all the privileges even of private members of 
the society." 

Since Mr. Wesley's death, his people have been divided ; 
but this division, it seems, respects discipline more than 
sentiment. Mr. Wesley professed a strong attachment to 
the established church of England, and exhorted the 
gocieties under his care to attend her service, and receive 
the Lord's supper from the regular clergy. But in the 
latter part of his time he thought proper to ordain some 
bishops and priests for America and Scotland ; but as one 
or two of the bishops have never been out of England since 



METBODISTS. 



95 



their appointment to the office, it is prolable that he 
intended a regular ordination should take place when the 
state of the connection might render it necessary. During 
his life, some of the societies petitioned to have preaching 
in their own chapels in church hours, and the Lord's 
Supper administered bj the travelling preachers. This 
request he generally refused, and where it could be con- 
veniently done, sent some of the clergymen who officiated 
at the New Chapel in London, to perform these solemn 
services. At the first conference after his death, which 
was held at Manchester, the preachers published a decla- 
ration, m which they said that they would " take up the 
Plan as Mr. Wesley had left it." This was by no means 
satisfactory to many of the preachers and people, who 
thought that religious liberty ought to be extended to all 
the societies which desired it. In order to favor this cause, 
so agreeable to the spirit of Christianity and the rights of 
Englishmen, several respectable preachers came forward ; 
and by the writings which they circulated through the 
connection, paved the way for a plan of pacification, by 
which it was stipulated, that in every society where a 
three-fold majority of class-leaders, stewards, and trustees 
desired it, the people should have preaching in church 
hours, and the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's Sup- 
per administered to them. The spirit of inquiry being 
roused did not stop here ; for it appeared agreeable both 
to reason and the customs of the primitive church, that 
the people should have a voice in the temporal concerns 
of the societies, vote in the election of church-officers, and 
give their suiBfrages in spiritual concerns. This subject 
produced a variety of arguments on both sides of the 
question : many of the preachers and people thought that 
an annual delegation of the general stewards of the cir- 
cuits, to sit either in the conference or the district meet- 



96 



METHODISIS. 



mgs, in order to assist in the disbursement of the yearly 
collection, the Kingswood School collection, and the 
preachers' fund, and in making new or revising cid laws, 
would be a bond of union between the conference and 
connection at large, and do awaj the Ferj idea of arbitrary 
power among the travelling preachers. In order to facili- 
tate this good work, many societies in various parts of the 
kingdom sent delegates to the conference held at Leeds in 
1797; they were iretructed to request that the people 
might have a voice in ihe formation of their own laws, the 
choice of their own officers, and the distribution of their 
own property. The preachers proceeded to discuss two 
motions : Shall delegates from the societies be admitted 
into the conference ? Shall circuit stewards be admitted 
into the district meetings ? Both motions were negatived, 
and consequently all hopes of accommodation between the 
parties were given up. Several friends of religious liberty 
proposed a plan for a new itinerancy. In order that it 
might be carried into immediate effect, they foimed them- 
selves into a regular meeting in Ebenezer Chapel, Mr. 
William Thom being chosen president, and Mr. Alexander 
Kilham, secretary. The meeting proceeded to arrange 
the plan for supplying the circuits of the new connection 
with preachers, and desired the president and secretary to 
draw up the rules of the church government, in order that 
they might be circulated through the societies for their 
approbation. Accordingly, a form of church government, 
suited to an itinerant ministry, was printed by these two 
brethren, under the title of Outlines of a Constitution 
proposed for the Examination, Amendment, and Accept- 
ance of the Members of the Methodist Kew Itinerancy." 
The plan was examined by select committees in the 
different circuits of the connection, and, with a few altera- 
tions, was accepted by the conference of preachers and 



METHODISTS. 



97 



delegates. The preachers and people are incorporated in 
all meetings for business, not by temporary concession, but 
by the essential principles of their constitution ; for the 
private members choose the class-leaders ; the leaders 
meeting nominates the stewards ; and the society confirms 
or rejects the nomination. The quarterly meetings are 
composed of the general stewards and representatives 
chosen by the different societies of the circuits, and the 
fourth quarterly meeting of the year appoints the preacher 
and delegate of every circuit that shall attend the general 
conference. For a further account of their principles and 
discipline, we must refer the reader to a pamphlet, entitled 
General Rules of the United Societies of Methodists in 
the New Connection. 

The Calvinistic Methodists are not incorporated into a 
body as the Armenians are, but are chiefly under the 
direction or influence of their ministers or patrons. 

It is necessary to observe here that there are many con- 
gregations in London, and elsewhere, who, although they 
are called Methodists, yet are neither in Mr. Wesley's, 
Mr. Whitfield's, nor the new connection. Some of these 
are supplied by a variety of ministers ; and others, border- 
ing more upon the congregational plan, have a resident 
minister. The clergy of the church of England who 
strenuously preach up her doctrines and articles, are called 
Methodists. A distinct connection upon Mr. Whitfield's 
plan was formed and patronized by the late Lady Hun- 
tingdon, and which still subsists. The term Methodist, 
also, is applied by way of reproach to almost every one 
who manifests more than common concern for the interests 
of religion, and the spiritual good of mankind. 

Methodism in this country, as in Great Britain, was at 
first an arm of the Church of England, without an or- 
dained ministry, and without ordinances. It aimed chiefly 

9 ■ G 



98 



METHODISTS. 



at the revival of true religion, and the conversion of sin- 
ners to God. Commencing with a congregation of five 
persons in the house of an Irish emigrant named Philip 
Embury, a lay or local preacher in 'New York, in 1766, 
the missionary spirit of the movement soon extended to 
other parts of the country. Societies were formed and the 
cause greatly advanced by Captain Webb, a British officer, 
who zealously preached the doctrines held by Wesley, and 
met with wonderful success. The classes grew and mul- 
tiplied on every hand until 1773, when, at a Conference 
held that year in Philadelphia, there were reported ten 
itinerant preachers and over one thousand communicants. 

The political revolution of 1776 occasioned some de- 
rangement in the work, and resulted in an entire change 
in the relations of American Methodism. The breaking 
up of the Church of England, and the return to that 
country of many English clergymen, left the societies 
destitute of the needed services of an ordained ministry. 
Mr. Wesley was importuned on the subject, and about 
the close of the war inaugurated measures for the in- 
dependency of the societies in the United States. This 
led to the formal organization and establishment of 

THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHUECH. 

In its Book of Discipline the origin and structure of 
the Church are thus set forth : " The preachers and mem- 
bers of our society in general, being convinced that there 
was a great deficiency of vital religion in the Church ol 
England in America, and being in many places destitute 
of the Christian Sacraments, as several of the clergy had 
forsaken their churches, requested the late Eev. John 
Wesley to take such measures, in his wisdom and pru- 
dence, as would afford them suitable relief in their dis- 
tress. 



METHODISTS. 



99 



"In consequence of this, our venerable friend, who, 
under God, has been the father of the great revival of re- 
ligion now extending over the earth by the means of the 
Methodists, determined to ordain ministers for America, 
and for this purpose, in the year 1784, sent over three 
regularly ordained clergy; but preferring the Episcopal 
mode of Church government to any other, he solemnly 
set apart, by the imposition of his hands and prayer, one 
of them, namely, Thomas Coke, doctor of civil law, late 
of Jesus College, in the University of Oxford, and a pres- 
byter of the Church of England, for the episcopal office ; 
and having delivered to him letters of episcopal orders^ 
commissioned and directed him to set apart Francis As- 
bury, then general assistant of the Methodist society in 
America, for the same episcopal office, he, the said Fran- 
cis Asbury, being first ordained deacon and elder. In con- 
sequence of which, the said Francis Asbury was solemnly 
set apart for the said episcopal office by prayer and the 
imposition of the hands of the said Thomas Coke, other 
regularly ordained ministers assisting in the sacred cere- 
mony. At which time the General Conference held at 
Baltimore did unanimously receive the said Thomas Coke 
tnd Francis Asbury as their bishops, being fully satisfied 
df the validity of their episcopal ordination." 

The " General Conference " above referred to, was con- 
vened December 25, 1784. The polity which has since 
mainly governed the Church was approved. But two 
arders in the ministry v\^ere recognized, that of deacon 
and elder or presbyter, the bishop being different from 
the latter only in office. Mr. Wesley was led to this 
opinion, as he declared, by reading Lord King's accouut 
of the Primitive Christian Church, The two American 
bishops thus providentially constituted immediately pre- 
pared and presented a patriotic address to General Wasli- 



100 



METHODISTS. 



ington, in the name of the people they repre»ented, receiv- 
ing from him as the first President of the United States 
a cordial recognition and the assurance of personal regard. 

In less than one hundred years from the date of its 
organization, Methodism has (.overed the whole continent, 
showing by the latest census returns, a membership in all 
its branches of nearly 3,000,000, and a ministry, travelling 
and local, of over 40,000 men. 

The officers of the Methodist Episcopal Church are 
class leaders, stewards, trustees, exhorters, local preachers, 
pastors in charge, presiding elders of districts, and general 
superintendents or bishops, the duties of each being de- 
fined in the Book of Discipline. 

The itinerant ministers, although springing directly from 
the people, held the legislative, executive, and judicial de- 
partments in their own hands until very recently. The 
right of lay representation, long a subject of controvers) 
and the occasion of schism, is now conceded, and incor- 
porated in the government of the Church. A General 
Conference, which meets quadrennially, possesses full pow- 
ers to revise any part of the discipline, except certain re- 
strictive rules relating to doctrine and the maintenance of 
the system of itinerancy, the concurrence of three-fourths 
of all the Annual Conferences being necessary to the al- 
teration of any important measure needing revision. 

The bishops are required to travel extensively, taking 
the oversight of the entire work. They are elected to 
office by the General Conference, to which body they are 
amenable. They preside at all the Annual Conferences, 
of which there are now seventy-six, ordain the deacons 
and elders by the imposition of hands, and appoint the 
pastors to their several circuits and stations. 

An immense book-concern in ISTew York and Cincin- 
nati, with branches in all the leading cities, from Boston 



METHODISTS. 



101 



to the Pacific coast, supplies the literary wants of the de- 
nomination. It is under the control of the General Con- 
ference, and publishes about 2000 bound volumes and 
over 1000 tracts in the English, German, Welsh, Swe- 
dish, Danish, and French languages. The periodical litera- 
ture of the Church consists of an able Quarterly Review, 
several monthly magazines, ten official, and as many semi- 
official and independent weekly papers, with a great va- 
riety of publications for Sunday-schools, all of which have 
an extensive circulation. 

The statistics for the year 1873 are : 14 bishops, 76 an- 
nual conferences, 10,571 travelling preachers, 1,288,704 
members, 175,323 probationers, making a total of perma- 
nent and probational membership of 1,404,027 ; local 
preachers, 12,261; Sunday-schools, 18,031; teachers, 
197,180; scholars, 1,318,603; church edifices, 14,500; 
estimated value of the same, $66,332,580, and of the 4678 
parsonages, $8,542,554. Contributions to benevolent ob- 
jects aside from church extension or church expenses, 
$1,085,339.87 ; appropriations for missionary purposes, 
1873-4, $843,149. The Missionary Board of the Church 
thus summarizes its foreign work in 1873 : 

The number of missionaries in the foreign field is 200, 
and of assistant missionaries, 435 ; of teachers, 317 ; of 
churches, 115; of parsonages, 61; of members, 14,683; 
of probationers, 5335 ; of day schools, 182, with 7406 
pupils ; Sunday-schools, 348, with 21,242 pupils. The lit- 
erary institutions of the Church are : 8 theological semi- 
naries; 32 universities and colleges; 70 academies and 
seminaries. 

THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHUECH, SOUTH, 

was formed in 1844. At the General Conference of thai 
year, differences of opinion on the subject of slavery be- 

9* 



102 



METHODISTS. 



came so antagonistic that a separation was eflected, and 
1155 ministers, with 639,164 members belonging in the 
Southern States, became a distinct ecclesiastical body. Its 
enterprise and ratio of increase corresponded Avith that of 
the parent Church, until the breaking out of the civil A^ar, 
which brought serious disaster upon all Southern institu- 
tions. Since the return of peace the Southern Methodists 
have displayed uncommon energy in "building up the 
waste places," reviving their literature, and enlarging the 
borders of their territory. They now number some 35 
Annual Conferences, 9 bishops, 8147 travelling and local 
preachers, and a membership of 654,159. 

A book-publishing house at Nashville, Tennessee, and 
official papers in various sections, with an adequate supply 
of periodical literature, 25 schools, 30 colleges and semi- 
naries, and all the machinery of an active organization, 
give vigor and vitality to this branch of Methodism. 

OTHER BRANCHES. 

From time to time there have been divisions and seces- 
sions among the "people called Methodists," mostly on 
account of Church government, the leading doctrines re- 
maining intact, and held fast by all in common. 

In 1792 a secession took place in Virginia headed by a 
presiding elder named James O'Kelly, who objected to the 
absolute power of the bishops in appointing the preachers, 
and contended for an appeal to the Conference. This 
Mr. O'Kelly was a man of very considerable popu- 
larity, and had great influence over the minds of those 
with whom he associated. The spirit of dissension was 
fomented by the publication of appeals to the preachers 
and people, and a number in southern Virginia and 
Nf^th Carolina joined themselves to his standard. They 



METHODISTS. 



103 



took the name of "Republican Methodists," though 
better known as O'Kelleyites. Their system of church 
polity was liberal, and for a time succeeded well ; but in 8 
few years they began to decline, and finally amalgamated 
with a branch of Baptists known as Christians. 

Another small secession took place in Vermont, A. D. 
1804, which resulted in the formation of 

THE REFORMED METHODIST CHURCH. 

The government established bj this branch is essentially 
Congregational; all power being in the churches. To the 
annual and general conferences are delegated power to 
transact business of a general character, for which they 
are held strictly accountable to the churches. The 
churches select their own ministers, and stipulate with 
them in respect to time and salary. In the beginning the 
churches ordained their own ministers, but subsequently 
lay ordination was discontinued. In the fall of 1841 an 
association was formed between the Keformed Methodists, 
Society Methodists, and several churches of Wesleyan 
Methodists, for mutual aid. And after the organization 
of the Wesleyan Methodist Chuech in 1843, prelim- 
inary steps were taken which some years later resulted in 
the union of the two bodies. At that time they had 5 con- 
ferences, about 50 ordained preachers and 3000 members. 
They had in 1873 about 228 ministers and 24,300 members. 

In 1820, a third secession from the old connection in 
New York took the name of 

THE METHODIST SOCIETY. 

They adopted the representative form of government. 
It required a majority of laymen in their conferences to 
form any rules for the government of the churches. The 
preachers remain in the same charge as long as they can 

r 



104 



METHODISTS. 



agree with the churches. Prosperity attended them for a 
few years ; but many of their ministers and members united 
with the Methodist Protestant Church. Within a few 
years they have again become active, and reported, in 1873, 
28 conferences, 766 itinerant and 432 local preachers, 595 
church edifices, 52,000 members and 1796 probationers. 
They are not Episcopal in their Church government. 

In 1821, an animated discussion of the principles of 
church polity was introduced into a periodical entitled the 
Wesleyan Repository, edited and published by William S. 
Stockton, a layman of the Methodist Episcopal Church in 
Trenton, N. J. It attracted general attention, and conti- 
nued to spread as a little leaven through the whole lump. 
Memorials praying for lay representation were addressed 
to the General Conference of 1824. Union societies were 
formed for the purpose of concentrating strength. These 
measures alarmed the powers that be, and the work of ex- 
pulsion commenced ; secession followed. A convention of 
reformers was held. The General Conference of 1828 
denied the right of lay representation, and refused redress. 
All hope of reform fled. ' The expelled and their friends 
organized churches, known as Associated Methodists ; 
and in 1830 a General Convention was held in Baltimore, 
which formed a Constitution and Discipline, adopting as 
the name of the association, 

THE METHODIST PROTESTANT CHURCH. 

Thirteen annual conferences were represented in the 
convention. Episcopacy was rejected as a spurious order, 
and ministerial parity asserted. The elementary principles 
of the government acknowledge the individuality of the 
local assemblies as churches of Christ — the Lord Jesus as 
the only Head of the Church — the Word of God the only 
rule of faith and practice — and private judgment as the 



METHODISTS. 



105 



right of man. They secure the freedom of speech and press, 
protect church-membership, and define the origin of power. 

The constitution recognises the mutual rights of minis- 
ters and laymen, and grants an equal representation to 
both. The doctrines taught — the means of grace — mode 
of worship and usages common to Methodists, are retained. 
The Church has been steadily progressing ever since ; and, 
at present, is extended over the whole of the United States 
There are 30 annual conferences, about 1500 ministers, 
and about 230,000 members. 

WESLEYAN METHODIST CHURCH & WESLEYAN CONNECTION. 

In 1843, a convention of Methodists from the Method- 
ist Episcopal Church and members of other Methodist 
bodies opposed to slavery, met in Utica, N. Y., and organ- 
ized the "Wesleyan Methodist Church," their polity being 
similar to the Methodist Protestants. In 1856 they had 
1000 ministers and 50,000 members. During the war they 
returned to the Methodist Episcopal Church. The Wes- 
LEYAN Connection is affiliated with the Wesleyans in 
Canada, and has in the United States about 250 preachers 
and 20,000 members. 

THE EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION, 
or Albrights, are in fact German Methodists, as they are 
familiarly called. The first society was organized in 1800, 
under their leader, Jacob Albright. In 1803 he was elected 
presiding elder, and ordained by the other preachers, and 
ecclesiastical regulations adopted. Their bishops, so called, 
are elected quadrennially. They have hitherto confined 
their labors to the German population chiefly. They have 
15 annual conferences, about 691 travelling and 486 local 
ministers, 1091 churches, valued at $2,391,047, and 83,195 
members, 1342 Sunday-schools and 90,551 teachers and 
scholars. 



106 



METHODISTS. 



The Peimitive Methodists have a number of socie- 
ties in this country, planted by emigrants from England. 
They have (1874) 2865 members, and 28 travelling and 
191 local preachers. 

Congregational, ok Independent, Methodists. — 
These, which have existed for some years, have organized 
into a General Conference within a few years. They have 
about 120 preachers and over 10,000 members, mostly in 
Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Texas. In 1816, a 
number of colored persons, finding their connection with 
the Methodist Episcopal Church subjected them to serious 
inconveniences, organized 

The African Methodist Episcopal Church. — 
Their polity is similar to the Methodist Episcoprl Church. 
They have now 5 bishops, 4000 jDreachers, travelling and lo- 
cal, and 375,000 members in the United States and Canada. 

The African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church 
was organized by a body of seceders from the Methodist 
Episcopal Church in New York, October 25, 1820. This 
Church is not strictly episcopal. Their bishops are styled 
superintendents, and elected quadrennially, and hold the 
office four years. They have 1500 travelling preachers, 
and 172,000 members. 

The Colored Methodist Episcopal Church was 
organized on the recommendation of the M. E. Church 
South, December 15, 1870. It has 4 bishops, 685 travel- 
ling and 583 local preachers, and 67,888 members. 

Two other of the minor Methodist bodies deserve men- 
tion — the Free Methodists, organized ahout 1868, and 
incorporated in 1873, with 90 ministers and about 6000 
members; and the Welsh Calvinistic Methodists, 
colonists from an English denomination, Methodists in 
Church government, but Calvinists in doctrine, with about 
60 ministers and 4500 members. 



METHODISTS. 



107 



THE FKEE METHODIST CHURCH. 

The Free Methodist Churcli liad its origin, as tlie founders 
of the same believed, in necessity, and not in choice. It did 
not grow out of a secession, nor out of an unsuccessful at- 
tempt to bring about a reform in the government of the 
Methodist Episcopal Church, in which it had its origin. 
Those concerned in its formation never expected a separation 
from that Church until they were, as they believed unjustly, 
excluded from its pale. They sought redress at the proper 
tribunal. It was not granted. Even a candid hearing was 
denied them. Thus thrown out, and the possibility of a re- 
storation being cut off, and believing that God still called 
them to labor for the salvation of souls, they had no alterna- 
tive but to form a new organization. In doctrine, discipline, 
and spirit they were Methodists, and hence they could not 
offer themselves to any other denomination. The issue on 
which they were thrust out was, as they understood it, be- 
tween dead formalism and the life and power of godliness^ 
and so they could not feel at home with those branches of 
the Methodist family into whose formation other question; 
mainly entered. 

A convention of ministers and laymen met at Pekin 
Niagara county, New York, on the 23d day of August, 1860, 
and adopted a Form of Discipline and Church Government. 

The superintendency of the Church, instead of being in 
vested in a board of bishops, is held by a minister or minis 
ters elected to such office by each recurring General Confer 
gnce, which is held once in four years. The supervision of 
the interests of the several districts of each Annual Confer 
ence is committed to a minister elected to the office by his 
Annual Conference, who is named chairman of the district, 
and may, in connection with the same, be a preacher in 
charge of a circuit, or may travel at large on his district, 
if so directed by his Annual Conference. The same preacher 
mav be chairman of more than one district. The system ia 



108 



METHODISTS. 



triat of an itinerant ministry, the appointments being made 
annually, by a stationing committee composed of the chair- 
men of the several districts, and an equal number of the lay 
delegates of each Annual Conference, which lay members of 
the committee are elected by ballot. 

The ministerial and lay elements enter equally into the 
formation of the General and Annual Conferences. 

The Quarterly Conferences of the Church have jurisdiction 
over an entire district, and are composed of the itinerant 
and local preachers, exhorters, stewards, and class leaders of 
each circuit in the district, and the chairman of the districi 
is president of the same. 

The temporal and spiritual interests of each circuit are 
under the advisement of an official board elected from its 
membership, at the meeting of which the preacher in charge 
is expected to preside. 

That the peculiar features of this body of Christians may 
be better understood, the following questions are subjoined^ 
which are proposed to those who wish to unite in Church 
fellowship with them. 

The candidate, having met in class six months on proba- 
tion, and having been baptized, must give satisfactory an* 
Bwers to them before being admitted into full connection. 

1. Have you the witness of the Spirit that you are a 
child of God? 

2. Have you that perfect love which casteth out fear ? If 
not, will you diligently seek until you obtain it ? 

8. Is it your purpose to devote yourself the remainder of 
your life wholly to the service of God, doing good to youi 
« fellow-men and working out your own salvation with feai 
and trembling? 

4. Will you for ever lay aside all superfluous ornaments, 
and adorD yourself in modest apparel, with shamefaced nes8 
and sobriety, not with broidered hair, cr gold, or pearls, ot 
costly array, but, which becometh those professing godliness, 
witli good works ? 

5. Will you abstain from connection with all secret socie* 



METHODISTS. 



109 



ties, keeping yourself free to follow the will of the Lord in 
all things ? 

6. Do you subscribe to our Articles of Keligion, our General 
Rules, and our Discipline, and are you willing to be governed 
by the same ? 

7. Have you Christian fellowship and love for the members 
of this society, and will you assist them, as God shall givf 
you ability, in carrying on the work of the Lord ? 

The person giving affirmative answers to the above ques- 
tions shall, with the consent of three-fourths of all the mem- 
bers present at a society meeting, be admitted to all the privi- 
leges of a member. Any person in good standing in any 
evangelical church may be received into full connection, upon 
his meeting the other requirements of this section, without 
having been on probation in our Church. 

The houses of worship of this denomination are built with- 
out any adornment of spire or stained-glass windows, and the 
seats are neither sold nor rented. The singing is done by the 
congregation, without the aid of a choir or instrumental music. 
All the modern devices for raising money so common in this 
age, such as festivals, fairs, oyster-suppers, pic-nics, lotteries^ 
excursions, etc., are totally ignored by this " peculiar people,* 
as they believe in giving directly to benevolent objects, and 
from the sole motive of obedience to the requirements of 
God, as revealed in his Holy Word. 

The statistics of this Church are as follows, \iz. : Five Con- 
ferences, which were organized in the order in which they are 
name4, viz. : Genesee, Illinois, Susquehanna, Michigan and 
Kansas and Missouri Conference. Travelling preachers, 128, 
local preachers, 126, members, including probationers, 6756. 
VaKie of Church property, $234,700. A weekly paper, called 
the "Free Methodist," is published in New York City, by 
Joseph Mackey, arid a monthly magazine called the " Earnest 
Christian," by Rev. B. T. Eoberts, at Rochester, New York 
A school called the " Chili Seminary," is also in successful 
operation, located in North Chili, Monroe county, New 
York. ,„ 



110 



KIRK OF SCOTLJLFD. 



KIRK OF SCOTLAND.^ 

The conversion of the Scots to the Christian faith began 
through the ministry of Paladins, about the year 430, and 
from the first establishment of Christianity in that country 
till the Reformation in the reign of Mary, mother of James I. 
and of Mary I. of England, their church government was 
episcopacy ; but the Presbyterian discipline was not finally 
established in Scotland, until the reign of King William 
and Mary, A. d. 1689, when episcopacy was totally abo- 
lished. The Westminster Confession of Faith was then 
received as the standard of the national creed ; which all 
ministers, and principals and professors in universities, are 
obliged to subscribe as the confession of their faith, before 
receiving induction into office. 

The Church of Scotland is remarkable for its uncommon 
simplicity of worship ; it possesses no liturgy, no altar, no 
instrumental music, no surplice, no fixed canonical vestment 
of any kind. It condemns the worship paid to saints, and 
observes no festival days. Its ministers enjoy a parity of 
rank and of authority; it enforces that all ministers, being 
ambassadors of Christ, are equal in commission ; that there 
is no order in the church, as established by the Saviour, 
superior to jresbyters; and that bishop and presbyter, 
though different words, are of the same import. It acknow- 
ledges no earthly head : its judicatories are quite distinct 
from, and independent of, any civil judicatory ; insomuch, 
indeed, that the decisions of the one are often contrary to 
those of the other, yet both remain unafiected and unal- 

* The word Kirk is of Saxon origin, and signifies Church ; or, 
according to others, it is a contraction of the Greek word mean^-^g 
the House of God, 



KIRK OF SCOTLAND. 



Ill 



tered. When, for example, a clergyman Las been pre- 
sented to a parish by a patron, and induction and ordination 
have followed on that presentation, if afterwards it be found 
that the patron, who had given the presentation, has not 
that right, and that it belongs to another, the clergyman 
may be ejected as to all the temporalities of the office ; but 
quoad sacra, he may continue minister of the parish, and 
exercise all the sacred functions : and though a new pre- 
sentee may obtain a right to the civil endowments of the 
benefice, he can perform none of the sacred duties, while 
the other chooses to avail himself of his privilege. 

There are four ecclesiastical judicatories, — namely, the 
Kirk Session, the Presbytery, the Synod, and the General 
Assembly, from each of which there is a power of appeal 
to the other ; but the decision of the General Assembly is 
supreme. 

The lowest court is the Kirk Session, which is composed 
of the minister of the parish, who is the moderator or pre- 
sident of it, and a number of the most grave and respec- 
table laymen, members of the congregation. Their number 
varies in different parishes, five or six being about the 
average number ; and their services are entirely gratuitous. 
They are something like churchwardens in England, only 
they have a spiritual jurisdiction, as it is a part of their 
duty to visit the sick, &c. The Kirk Session takes cogni- 
sance of cases of scandal, such as fornication. Sabbath- 
breaking, profane swearing. It also manages the funds 
of the poor, a duty in which it formerly was assisted by 
deacons, a class of men inferior to elders, as they had no 
spiritual jurisdiction ; but not being found necessary, they 
are consequently disused. 

The Presbytery, which is the court next in dignity, is 
composed of the ministers of a certain district, with an 
elder from each parish. The number of presbyteries ia 



112 



KIRK OF SCOTLAND. 



sevwxty- eight. Their chief duty consists in the manage- 
ment of such matters as concern the church within theii 
respective bounds. But they may originate any matter, 
and bring it under the view of the Synod or General As- 
sembly. They have also the superintendence of education 
within their bounds, such as the induction of teachers, and 
the examination of schools. 

The Synod is the next intermediate court. There are 
fifteen synods, each consisting of the clergymen of a cer- 
tain number of presbyteries, with elders, as in presbyteries. 
Presbyteries meet generally once a month ; synods twice 
a year, though some remote synods, such as that of Argyle, 
only once. 

The General Assembly is the last and supreme court, ' 
and meets yearly in the month of May, in Edinburgh, and 
continues its sittings for twelve days. The king presides 
by his representative, who is always a nobleman, and is 
denominated the Lord Sigh Commissioner. The General 
Assembly is a representative court, consisting of 200 mem- 
bers representing presbyteries, and 156 elders representing 
burghs or presbyteries, and five ministers or elders repre- 
senting universities, — making altogether 361 members. 
They choose a moderator or president, out of their own 
number, distinct from the Royal Commissioner, the duty 
of the latter consisting merely m convening and dissolving 
the court, and in forming the medium of communication 
between it and the throne. The moderator is now always 
a clergyman, though previously to 1688, laymen sometimes 
held that office. 

The duties of the Scotch clergy are numerous and labo- 
rious. They officiate regularly in the public worship of 
Grod ; and in general, they must go through this duty twica 
every Sunday (exclusively of other occasional appearances), 
deliveiing every Sunday a lecture and a ter^'/un^ with 



iIRK OP SCOTLAND. 



113 



prayers. It is also expected, throughout Scotland, that th«i 
prayers and discourses shall be of the minister's own com- 
position ; and the prayers, in all cases, and the discourses, 
in most instances, are delivered without the use of papers. 
They are expected to perform the alternate duties of exam^ 
ining their people from the Scriptures and catechisms of 
the church, and of visiting them from house to house, with 
prayers and exhortations. This is done commonly once in 
the year, being omitted only in those cases in which the 
ministers deem it impracticable, or not acceptable, or at 
least not necessary. The charge of the poor devolves, in 
a very particular manner, on the clergy, and in them also 
is vested the superintendence of all schools within their 
bounds. 

Baptism in this church is practised by none but ministers, 
who do it by sprinkling ; and whether performed in private 
or in public, it is almost always preceded by a sermon. 

The Lord's Supper is not administered so frequently in 
Scotland as in some other places. Some time before this 
sacrament is dispensed, it is announced from the pulpit. 
The week b efore, the Kirk Session meets, and draws up a 
list of all the communicants in the parish, according to the 
minister's examination-book, and the testimony of the 
elders and deacons. According to this list, tickets are 
delivered to each communicant, if desired, and the ministers 
and elders also give tickets to strangers who bring sufficient 
testimonials. None are allowed to communicate without 
such tickets, which are produced at the table. Those who 
never received are instructed by the minister, and by 
them3elves in the nature of the sacraments, and taught 
what is the proper preparation thereunto. The Wednes- 
day or Thursday before, there is a solemn fast, and on the 
Saturday there are two preparatory sermons. On Sunday 
morning, after singing and prayer usual, the minister 

10* H 



114 



KIRK OF SCOTLAND. 



of the parish preaches a suitable sermon ; and when the 
ordinary worship is ended, he in the name of Jesus Christ 
forbids the unworthy to approach, and invites the penitent 
to come and receive the sacrament. Then he goes into 
the body of the church, where one or two tables, according 
to its width, are placed, reaching from one end to the 
other, covered with a white linen cloth, and seats on both 
sides for the communicants. The minister places himself 
at the end or middle of the table. After a short discourse, 
he reads the institution, and blesses the elements ; then he 
breaks the bread, and distributes it and the wine to those 
that are next him, who transmit them to their neighbors ; 
the elders and deacon attending to serve, and see that the 
whole is performed with decency and order. While these 
communicate, the minister discourses o^. the nature of the 
eacrament ; and the whole is concluded with singing and 
prayer. The minister then returns to the pulpit, and 
preaches a sermon. The morning-service ended, the con- 
gregation are dismissed for an hour ; after which the usual 
afternoon worship is performed. On the Monday morning, 
there is public worship, with two sermons ; and these, 
properly speaking, close the communion-service. No 
private communions are allowed in Scotland. 

Marriage is solemnized nearly after the manner of the 
Church of England, with the exception of the ring, which 
is deemed a great relic of " popery." By the laws of 
Scotland, the marriage-knot may be tied without any 
ceremony of a religious nature : a simple promise in the 
presence of witnesses, or a known previous cohabitation, 
being sufficient to bind the obligation. 

The funeral ceremony is performed in total silence. The 
corpse is carried to the grave and there interred without 
a word being spoken on the occasion. 

The statistics of the Kirk of Scotland w^ere, in 1871, 



THE FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND. 



115 



about 1300 parishes, 436, 147 communicants and over 
1,000,000 of adherent population, 1810 Sunday-schools, 
188,815 teachers and scholars; benevolent contributions, 
$1,276,753 (gold). 



THE FEEE CHUECH OF SCOTLAND. 

This Church separated from the Kirk of Scotland in 
1843, not upon any question of doctrine, but in conse- 
quence of the enforcement by the civil authorities of 
^' patronage" in its most offensive forms upon the Kirk of 
Scotland. The treaty of Union, or Act of Settlement, 
consummated between England and Scotland in 1706, ex- 
pressly guaranteed the integrity of the Kirk of Scotland, 
as established in 1689 under the reign of William and 
Mary, in its freedom from prelacy, from the royal suprem- 
acy in things spiritual, and from the law of patronage — 
i. e., from the power of the patron of a living (generally a 
layman owning a large estate) to appoint a minister to 
that living without the sanction and vote of the members 
of the parish. This pledge was violated only five years 
later by Parliament, which, under Bolingbroke's leader- 
ship, reimposed lay patronage upon the Scottish Church. 
Still, for more than a hundred years there had been but 
few and comparatively slight conflicts of authority between 
the civil and ecclesiastical power. The leading men in the 
Scottish Church toward the close of the last century and in 
the early years of the present were " Moderates,'^ or men 
who upheld the civil power at all hazards, and who were 
not unwilling to see the "Evangelical" portion kept out 
of the best positions by the occasional exertion of lay 
patronage. But the Evangelicals finally came to be no 
longer in the minority, and in 1834, having a majority in 



116 THE FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND. 

tlie General Assembly, passed an act giving to tlie male 
heads of families in every parish the right of objecting to 
any presentee whom the patron might wish inducted into 
the pastorate over them. This speedily brought on a con- 
flict of authority, and the civil courts, construing their 
powers under the law of 1711 as giving them ample au- 
thority, set themselves to vex the Church, making the 
whole matter of patronage as offensive as possible, and 
crushing out with an iron hand the last vestige of inde- 
pendence and freedom in the parishes. An appeal to Par- 
liament in 1842 gave them no relief,, but confirmed the 
action of the civil courts ; and at the session of the Gen- 
eral Assembly in 1843, the moderator, Rev. Dr. Welsh, 
after reading an eloquent protest against this invasion of 
the rights of conscience, which was signed by two hundred 
and three clergymen, bowed respectfully to the Queen's 
Commission and left the church, followed by Drs. Chal- 
mers, Candlish, Guthrie, Cunningham and four hundred 
and sixty-nine other ministers of the Kirk, as well as by a 
great number of elders and members of the Kirk. This 
act, generally known as " the Disruption,'^ is one of the 
grandest recorded in history. These four hundred and 
seventy-four clergymen by this movement abandoned in- 
comes and manse- property, amounting to not less than ten 
millions of dollars, for conscience' sake. They were at 
once thrown out of their churches and manses, their con- 
gregations in most cases occupying them, and for a time 
every species of annoyance and persecution was practiced 
on them by the landholders and patrons. In many in- 
stances they were refused sites to build new churches or 
manses, and many lives of ministers and people were sac- 
rificed from the necessity of meeting for worship in the 
open air during the severe weather. Drs. Chalmers, Cun- 
ningham, Guthrie and several of the younger men at once 



THE FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND. 



117 



undertook the work of raising funds for new churches, new 
manses, and a sustentation fund for equalizing the salaries 
of the ministers, and such was their eloquence, zeal and 
success that, though they shattered their own constitutions 
in the effort, they had raised, in the next sixteen years, the 
sum of $30,000,000 for these and their necessary purposes ; 
they had built 800 churches, 600 parsonages, 900 school- 
houses; had established two normal schools of great 
ejSiciency, three colleges in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Ab- 
erdeen ; erected an Assembly hall in Edinburgh, and mis- 
sion premises in the chief cities in the three presidencies 
of India. The average salary of their ministers was $900, 
with a parsonage-house and garden, and in some parishes 
small glebes. They have kept up, or, rather, materially 
increased, their rate of giving from that time to the pres- 
ent, and on the completion of the thirtieth year of their 
history had contributed for church and missionary pur- 
poses very nearly $60,000,000 — their contributions in 1873 
exceeding $2,263,000. These, it must be remembered, 
were the voluntary contributions of a population not av- 
eraging, through the whole period, over 400,000 persons, 
and at first very much less than that — a people by no 
means rich, and many of them very poor, and already 
thrown out of all the church property which had been 
theirs from childhood. Their statistics for 1873 were, 
churches, about 1100; ordained ministers, 950; members, 
237,516; Sunday-schools, 2614, with 13,815 teachers and 
151,848 scholars; contributions to benevolent objects in 
1873, $2,263,947. 



118 UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, SCOTLAND. 



THE UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 
IN SCOTLAND. 

This Church was constituted in 1847 by the amalgama- 
tion of the Secession and Relief churches, whose origin 
and history date, the former from 1733 and the latter from 
1753. The founders of both were driven out of the Kirk 
of Scotland — Rev. Ebenezer Erskine and his friends for 
their opposition to the Law of Patronage and the arbitrary 
action of the court or Moderate party in the General As- 
sembly in relation to all who protested against their cause ; 
and Rev. Thomas Gillespie and his friends in consequence 
of their assertion of the right of congregations to elect 
their own ministers. Both churches grew with consider- 
able rapidity, and though the Secession Church split in 
1747 on the question of taking the burgess oath into the 
General Associate or Anti-Burgher Synod, and the Associ- 
ate or Burgher Synod, yet they came together again in 
1820, and became a very efficient Church. The Secession 
Church was at first very much restricted in its commu- 
nion, admitting of no communion with other Presbyterian 
churches, but since 1820 it has become more liberal. The 
Relief Church had from the first permitted communion 
with all the Presbyterian churches. The Secession Church 
was also actively engaged in missionary enterprises. These 
two churches, having seceded from the General Assembly 
of the Church of Scotland for similar and almost identical 
reasons, holding the same views, and both voluntary 
churches in principle and practice, were irresistibly drawn 
toward each other and formally amalgamated under the 
name of United Presbyterians in 1847, the Uelief Church 
having at that time one hundred and thirteen congrega- 



UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, SCOTLAND. 119 

tions, and the Secession three hundred and eighty-four con- 
gregations, and the two having a membership of more than 
140,000. Since their union their career has been one of 
uninterrupted prosperity. They adopt the Presbyterian 
form of Church government, though having no interme- 
diate between the presbytery and the General Synod, 
but in 1873 they made arrangements to convert the 
Synod into a General Assembly. They adhere to the 
Westminster Assembly's Confession of Faith and Larger 
and Shorter Catechisms for substance of doctrine.^' The 
question of union with the Free Church of Scotland has 
been agitated for several years, but has not yet been con- 
summated. The principal difficulty, as it is the only point 
of difference between the two, is on the question of Volun- 
taryism, or the relation of civil magistrates to religion. 
The Free Church are Voluntaries in practice, and have 
given a splendid examiple of what can be achieved by Vol- 
untaryism; but they hold as an abstract theory to the 
recognition of the obligation of the State to further the 
interests of the Lord Jesus Christ, while the United Pres- 
byterian Church is consistent in its principles and practice, 
and holds that the State should have nothing to do with 
the Church of Christ in the way of giving it State money 
or State support, and that the present connections of 
Church and State should be severed. The United Pres- 
byterian Church in the United States is, like its Scottish 
namesake, composed of the union of two or three of the 
minor divisions of the Presbyterian Church, and in its 
general principles varies little from its Scottish congener. 

The statistics of the United Presbyterian Church of 
Scotland in 1873 were, congregations, 611 ; ministers, 
612; communicants, 182,810; Sunday-school teachers, 
10,870 ; Sunday-school scholars, 106,500 ; benevolent con- 
tributions, 81,654,665. They have a Theological Hall in 
Edinburgh. Their missionary operations are extensive; 



120 



ENGLISH PRESBYTERIANS. 



they had, in 1873, 81 missionaries, teachers and physicians, 
and 220 native assistants; 197 stations and out-stations; 
6630 communicants; 1024 candidates; 157 schools; 9183 
pupils, and $349,485 expended on their missions. They 
are about uniting with the English Presbyterians and the 
United Presbyterian Church in England. 



ENGLISH PEESBYTEETANS. 
The appellation Presbyterian is in England appropri* 
ated to a large denomination of dissenters, who have no 
attachment to the Scotch mode of church government any 
more than to episcopacy amongst us, and therefore to thia 
body of Christians the term Presbyterian^ in its original 
sense, is improperly applied. This misapplication has oc- 
casioned many wrong notions, and should be rectified. 
English Presbyterians, as they are called, adopt nearl;^ 
the same mode of church government with the Independ- 
ents. Their chief difference from the Independents is, 
that they are less attached to Calvinism, and consequently 
admit a greater latitude of religious sentiment. It maj 
be added, that their mode of admitting members into com 
munion differs from that commonly practised among tht 
Presbyterians. 

Recently a remarkable change has taken place in the 
ecclesiastical arrangements of the English Presbyterians. 
The Free Church of Scotland has erected its banner in Eng- 
land, and is now rallying its forces. The character of this 
new Presbyterian church in England, is the same with that 
of the Free Church. They are now negotiating a union 
with the United Presbyterian Church of Scotland, with 
which they are in perfect accord. 

Under the care of the Presbyterian Synod of England, 
besides a Theological College, there are seven Presbyteries, 
viz. : Berwick-on-Tweed, Birmingham, Cumberland, Lan- 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMBRICA. 



121 



cashire, London, Newcastle-on-Tyne and Northumberland. 
In these Presbyteries there are 112 clergymen, 133 churches 
and 24,500 communicants. It is actively engaged in be- 
nevolent operations, especially foreign and home missions, 
and ministerial education. Its contributions to these ob- 
jects in 1872 were about $350,000. Considering the com- 
paratively short time in which this progress has been 
made, it appears to be highly encouraging. 



PKESBYTEEIANS IN AMEEICA. 

There are various methods of classification adopted by 
ecclesiastical writers in describing the religions of Christen- 
dom. One of the most common is that which distin- 
guishes them by their form of church government and 
the different ranks of their clergy. Under this classifica- 
tion they may all be arranged under three classes : 1. The 
Prelatical, which embraces the Eastern or Greek Church, 
with its various branches and offshoots, the Roman or 
Western Church, the Church of England and its congeners, 
the Episcopal churches of Ireland, Scotland and the U. S., 
the Methodist Episcopal Church in the U. S., and most 
of the other Methodist churches, the Lutheran churches of 
Sweden, Norway and Denmark, the Moravian churches, 
and some other minor sects. 2. The Presbyterial, which, 
recognizing only clergymen, of equal rank, and the subor- 
dinate offices of elders and deacons, yet maintains a series 
of Church courts or judicatories, and permits appeals in 
matters of discipline from Church session to presbytery, to 
synod, and to General Assembly, the decision of the last- 
named court being final. These include the Lutheran 
churches of Germany and Austria ; the Reformed churches 
of Holland, Germany, Switzerland, France and Italy ; the 
Presbyterian churches of all names in England, Scotland 
and Ireland; the Presbyterian and Reformed bodies in the 
United States, and several of the minor sects whose gov- 



122 PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 

ernmeiit is Presbyterial. 3. Tlie Congregational, or Inde- 
pendent, in which each church is independent of all others, 
except in the matter of fellowship and Christian sym- 
pathy. They admit no appeal from a church to any higher 
body, and acknowledge no authority higher than the Bible, 
have no Church courts, and permit no dictation from pres- 
bytery, synod or bishop. To this class belong the Congre- 
gationalists, the Baptists and some of the minor Methodist 
denominations, the Christians, Christian Union, Disciples, 
and the Independents and Baptists of Europe. 

These three classes differ widely among themselves in 
doctrine — so widely that between some of them there is 
hardly a recognition of a common Christianity ; but each 
adheres to its own form of Church government. Of the 
three classes, the second is the most homogeneous, and its 
various branches or sects assimilate most nearly to each 
other in their doctrines. In common with the third class, 
it professes, which the first does not, to acknowledge no 
authority, in respect to the doctrines and duties of the 
Christian Church, but the will of God as found in the 
sacred Scriptures, rejecting tradition, the doctrines of the 
fathers and the decisions of the Church, except where they 
are in accordance with the Scriptures. Yet in some of its 
branches there is a tendency to limit the rights of private 
judgment in religious matters, and to adhere with great 
tenacity to creeds, confessions of faith and catechisms, 
and to make these, instead of the Scriptures, the standards 
of authority in relation to Christian doctrine. There is 
less of this in the General Assembly of the Presbyterian 
Church in the United States than in most of the others, 
yet their adherence to the Westminster Assembly's Con- 
fession of Faith and catechisms is a matter of notoriety. 
The following statement of the polity of this Church is 
from one of its ablest ministers : 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



123 



" It maintains that God alone is Lord of the conscience, 
and hath Jeft it free from the doctrines and commandments 
of men; and that the rights of private judgment, in all 
matters that respect religion, are universal and inalienable. 
It holds, that all ecclesiastical power is only ministerial 
and declarative ; that is to say, that the Holy Scriptures 
are the only rule of faith and manners ; that no church 
judicatory ought to pretend to make laws to hind the con- 
science in virtue of their own authority, and that all their 
decisions ought to he founded upon the word of GcJ. Ec- 
clesiastical discipline is purely moral and spiritual in its 
object, and ought not to be attended with any civil effects ; 
hence it can derive no force whatever but from its own 
justice, the approbation of an impartial public, and the 
favor and blessing of the great Head of the church. 

^' The officers of the Presbyterian Church are bishops or 
pastors, ruling elders and deacons. The pastor is the 
spiritual teacher of the congregation. He is expected to' 
preach the gospel in the church on the Lord's day, to in- 
struct the people by occasional lectures, to superintend the 
cateckismal teaching of the young, and to visit the sick 
and bereaved, and console them by spiritual counsel adapted 
to their necessities. Ruling elders are elected by the peo- 
ple as their representatives in the ecclesiastical courts, and 
to co-operate with the pastor in watching over the spiritual 
interests of the congregation. They are designated by 
the Apostle Paul under the title of "governments," and 
as ^ those who rule well,' in distinction from such as labor 
in word and doctrine. Deacons are secular officers whose 
duty is the care of the poor, and the reception and dis- 
bursement of the charities of the congregation. 

" The Session is the primary court of the Church, and 
consists of the pastor and the ruling elders. The pas- 
tor is the president, and has the title of * Moderator 



124 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



of the session.' In this primary court originates all tlie 
legislative action of the church. If the superior courts 
would take any step involving new constitutional princi 
pies, they are obliged to send the question down to the 
church sessions, that they may thus know the will of the 
church itself, before any revolutionary measures can be 
adopted. The session is also charged with the duty of 
watching over the spiritual interests of the congregation. 
It can summon offenders to an account for their irregular- 
ities, or their neglect of Christian duty. It can investi- 
gate charges presented by others, and admonish, rebuke, 
or suspend or exclude from the Lord's table, those who are 
found to deserve censure, according to the degree of their 
criminality. It is the business of the session also to ap- 
point a delegate of its own body to attend, with the pas- 
tor, the higher judicatories of the church. It is required 
of the session to keep a fair record of all its proceedings, 
as also a register of marriages, baptisms, persons admitted 
to the Lord's Supper, deaths, and other removals of church 
members, and to transmit these records, at stated periods, 
to the presbytery for their inspection. 

^^A Presbytery consists of all the ministers, and one 
ruling elder from each church within a certain district. 
Three ministers and as many elders as may be present 
are necessary to constitute a quorum. The presbytery has 
power to receive and issue appeals from church sessions, 
and references brought before them in an orderly manner ; 
to examine and license and ordain candidates for the holy 
ministry ; to install, remove, and judge ministers ; to exa- 
mine and approve or censure the records of church ses- 
sions ; to resolve questions of doctrine or discipline, 
seriously and reasonably proposed ; to condemn erroneous 
opinions which injure the purity or peace of the Church ; 
to visit particular churches for the purpose of inquiring 



PKESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



125 



into their state, and redressing the evils that may have 
arisen in them ; to unite or divide congregations, at the 
request of the people, or to form or receive new congrega- 
tions ; and, in general, to perform whatever may be deemed 
necessary to the spiritual welfare of the churches under 
their care. 

" A Synod consists of several presbyteries united. Not 
less than three presbyteries are necessary to compose a 
synod. It is not made up of representatives from the 
oresbyteries, as presbyteries are of representatives from 
the sessions. On the contrary, each member of all the 
presbyteries included in its bounds is a member of the 
synod, so that a synod is nothing different from a larger 
presbytery, constituted by a combination of several pres- 
byteries into one. The synod reviews the records of pres- 
byteries, approving or censuring their proceedings, erect- 
ing new presbyteries, uniting or dividing those which were 
before erected, taking a general care of the churches 
within its bounds, and proposing such measures to the 
General Assembly as may be for advantage to the whole 
church. The synod is a court of appeal for the presby- 
teries within its bounds, having the same relation to the 
presbyterial courts which the presbyteries have to the 
sessions.'^ 

The General Assembly is the highest judicatory in the 
Presbyterian Church. It is constituted of an equal dele- 
gation of pastors and elders from the presbyteries. It is 
properly a court of appeal, whose decisions are final, as 
well as an advisory and legislative council in all matters 
pertaining to the interests of the Church, and directs the 
operations of its various benevolent Boards, and has a 
supervision and control over its theological seminaries. 

The General Assembly is not necessary to the most 
perfect development of Presbyterian Church government, 
11* 



126 PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 

nor, indeed, is any court higher than the Presbytery ; but 
it has this obvious advantage, of representing all the con- 
gregations of this denomination under the same civil 
government in a single body. Thus, the General Assem- 
bly of the Kirk of Scotland and the General Assembly 
of the United States, before either was divided, presented 
dn imposing influence in the visible unity of each. 

The Church Sessions meet at stated periods, as often as 
may be deemed necessary. In some churches they con- 
vene once in each week; in others less frequently. Pres- 
byteries hold two stated meetings in a year, while the 
fcynods in the United States meet annually, lu the two 
great branches of the Presbyterian Church in the United 
States, one General Assembly meets annually, and the 
other triennially. It is a rule in all the judicatories of 
the Presbyterian Church, that the meetings shall be con- 
stituted with prayer. In the stated meetings of presby- 
teiies, synods, and the General Assembly, the session is 
opened by a iermon from the Moderator, or presiding offi- 
cer of the preceding meeting. 

The Doctrines of the Presbyterian Church are Calvin- 
istic — the doctrines of all the leading Reformers ; of the 
Wa)denses, for five or six hundred years before the Refor- 
makon ; of Augustin and the primitive Church. They 
are substantially the same with the doctrinal symbols of 
th^ Synod of Dort, the Heidelberg Confession and Cate- 
cbsm, and of the Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of 
Er«gland, and of the Episcopal Church of the United 
Sutes. No other branch of the Reformed Churches has 
maintained Caivinistic doctrines with so much tenacious- 
D^ss as Presbyterians. While the Earl of Chatham could 
say of his own Church of England, We have a Popish 
liturgy, a Caivinistic creed, and an Arminian clergy;" 
and while that denomination seem to be en^a^j^ed in an 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



127 



»nterminable controversy to decide whether their branch 
of the Church ought to be considered Arminian or Calvin- 
istic, the Presbyterian Church is unitedly Calvinistic, so 
that any man who should avow himself Arminian could 
not obtain ordination in the Presbyterian Church of either 
Scotland or America. 

The system of doctrine is clearly set forth in the West- 
minster Confession of Faith, and the Larger and Shorter 
Catechisms. 

The Presbyterian Church in the United States origi 
nated in a union of immigrants from Ireland and England 
— a blending of Irish Presbyterianism and English Con- 
gregationalism. The first presbytery formed in this coun- 
try was the presbytery of Philadelphia, organized in 1704. 
The synod of Philadelphia was erected in 1716, and was 
composed of the presbyteries of Philadelphia, Snow Hill, 
Newcastle, and Long Island. 

In 1741 the Church was divided in consequence of the 
inharmonious elements of which it was composed, and the 
synod of New York was formed. Fifteen years after the 
separation, in 1758, the synods of New York and Phila 
delphia were united again. In 1789, the year of the first 
meeting of the General Assembly, there were in the 
Church 188 Presbyterian ministers and 419 churches. In 
1832 there were 21 synods, 110 presbyteries, 935 minis- 
ters, 2281 churches, and 17,348 communicants. In 1837, 
the Presbyterian Church was again thrown into a state of 
disunion, and divided into two nearly equal portions. 

This (division had its origin and source in differences of 
opinion mainly on three points — a doctrinal question of 
moral ability and inability ; a question of ethics, viz., the 
relation of the Church to slaveholding ; and a question of 
polity, the advisableness of Church Boards. But though 
the controversy was bitter at first, and, as is generally the 



128 



PEESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



case in theological controversies^ there was great rancor 
and un charitableness on the part of some of the leaders, 
yet time softened the hostility, and the two bodies, under 
the wise counsels of careful and judicious men, constantly 
drew nearer to each other. 

The disruption had been attended with violent contro- 
versies, trials for heresy and law suits, yet many hearts, in 
both sections of the Church, continued to be linked together 
in indissoluble bonds. Neither body attempted to alter, in 
the slightest manner, the doctrinal standards, or departed 
from the well-known principles of the Presbyterian polity. 
Multitudes on both sides never ceased to yearn for a heal- 
ing of the breach, and the exscinded or ISTew School 
portion, for a long time did not give up the hope of a 
satisfactory adjustment of difficulties, and consequently 
delayed taking action, looking to the maintenance of a 
separate denominational existence. 

The first steps, however, which they took, with this end 
In view, as the event turned out, were steps in an indirect,, 
but sure road to reunion. They proved and they cultivated 
the genuine Presbyterianism of the body, and they gradu- 
ally separated them from that co-operation with Congrega- 
tionalists and with voluntary and outside societies, which 
was so distasteful to the Old School body and which was, in 
fact, the immediate cause of the division. Many leading 
Ne^ School men, whose sympathy with the Congregational- 
ists was strong, resisted these movements for denomina 
tional and separate action, as ignoring the past record and 
destroying the comprehensive spirit of the body ; but the 
majority perceiving no salvation for the denomination but 
m looking after its own Home Missionary, Educational and 
Publishing interests, continued to press them, until a degree 
of interior organization and success was reached, rivaling 
that of the Old School body itself. 

In another course of action, the New School body was as 
surely, and yet as unexpectedly, preparing for the same re- 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 129 

mote result. The high ground it took on the subject of 
slavery, after estranging many of its conservative members 
North and South, at length, in 1851, culminated in a deliver- 
ance, mild, but firm and explicit, which drove off almost its 
entire Southern membership in a body. The Southern sec- 
tion of the Old School Church, on the contrary, powerful 
in numbers and in the extraordinary ability of some of its 
leading men, held back the Old School Assembly from any 
positive action and serious agitation of the subject thus 
maintaining its standing in the prevalent conservative sen- 
timent of the country, and putting the New School Assembly 
at a disadvantage as a body of agitators, especially in the 
Middle States, where the great strength of the denomina- 
tion lay. 

All this seemed but to deepen and widen the division be- 
tween the two bodies. But the unforeseen and mighty ele- 
ment of the Southern Rebellion was yet to come in play, as 
one of the forces bearing on the question. In 1861, the 
entire Southern constituency of the Old School Church was 
sundered violently from the main body, the General As- 
sembly which met at Philadelphia that year having taken 
high loyal ground on the issues of the war. At the same 
time, the New School Assembly meeting in Syracuse, 
was establishing its Permanent Committee of Home Mis- 
sions, and withdrawing finally from co-operation with tho 
Congregationalists on that important field. 

Thus the course of events brought the assemblies on a 
common platform, on two of the very subjects which had 
most widely divided them — Church-boards and slavery. 
And the various experiences of the ensuing four years^ 
struggle, the common hopes, fears, trials, sacrifices and 
labors of that tremendous ordeal, continually strengthened 
every tie of sympathy between them. 

The lively co-operation of the various Christian denomina- 
tions in the vast sanitary, benevolent and Christian ent<?r- 
prizes for the benefit of the soldiers during the war, did 

I 



130 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



more to break down denominational prejudices, and to culti- 
vate a broad spirit of evangelical catholicity, than any other 
agency in the century. The Christian Commission, under 
the able and zealous leadership of George H. Stuart, Esq., of 
Philadelphia, was especially serviceable in associating min- 
isters and laymen of all denominations, in labors of Christian 
love, in the camp, on the march, in the hospital, and on the 
battle field. Amid these scenes of deep spiritual necessity 
and of imminent death, all human distinctions seemed 
trifling. Great and simple truths alone could reach and 
sustain the soul, in such times as these. 

Doctrinal controversy had almost wholly ceased between 
the bodies. The popular interest in such discussions had 
subsided. The personal asperities of the conflict of a quarter 
of a century ago had worn away. Differences of opinion on 
unessential matters in the Calvinistic system were found to 
exist in both branches. New School men were called to Old 
School pulpits, and Old School men to New School pulpits, 
without any peculiar sense of incongruity among the par- 
ties concerned. Large-minded laymen, practical men of 
business, like Robert Carter, on the one side, and William 
B. Dodge, on the other, could see no reasons for prolonging 
the state of disunion between two churches of the same name, 
standard and spirit. Both bodies were rich in divines of 
standing and influence, recognized, like Gardiner Spring 
and Albert Barnes, throughout Christendom. 

The first in the series of formal movements towards re- 
union was taken conjointly by the Old School Presbytery of 
Ogdensburg and the New School Presbytery of St. Lawrence, 
'xk a meetii-jor held at O^rdensburo^, N. Y., January 14th, 1862. 
The joint meeting passed a unanimous resolution expressive 
of their desire to be united into one body, and under cne 
General Assembly, and sent an overture in favor of reunion 
to the two assemblies which met in the following May. 

The Old School Assembly, which met in Columbus, 0., 
did not make a very encouraging response to the overture, 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



131 



but by a unanimous vote they resolved to commence the 
fraternal interchange of delegates or commissioners with 
the New School Assembly, provided that body met their 
proposals in the same amicable spirit. The New School 
Assembly,- meeting at the same time, in Cincinnati, ex- 
pressed themselves as cordially in sympathy with the spirit 
of the overtures on reunion, and declared that they had 
never shown a temper adverse to union, and that it would 
give them pleasure to unite with all occupying the same 
doctrinal and ecclesiastical position with themselves, and 
who agreed with them on the great moral questions of the 
day. Beyond this declaration of their views, however, they 
preferred not to advance at the present time. They had 
adjourned too early to receive notice of the proposal of 
the Old School Assembly for an interchange of delegates. 

Meeting in Philadelphia the next year, the New School 
Assembly took up this proposal on the second day of the 
session, and by a standing and unanimous vote, accepted 
it, "with heartfelt pleasure and Christian salutations.'^ 
Their action was telegraphed without delay to the other 
Assembly, meeting at the same time, in Peoria, who, by 
the same expeditious method, commissioned Rev. Septimus 
Tuslin, D. D., formerly Chaplain of the United States 
Senate, and Hon. George Sharswood, LL.D., of Philadel- 
phia, to represent them on the floor of the New School 
Assembly. Rev. Robert W. Patterson, D. D., and Hon. 
VVm. H. Brown of Chicago, were appointed by the New 
School body to bear their salutations to the Assembly at 
Peoria. 

Thus commenced a correspondence, in which, at once, the 
scandal of the division was done away, and the mind of the 
Church, as represented in its highest judicatories, prepared 
for an organic union. 

In 1866, both the General Assemblies m^t in St. Louis. 
This was the first meeting held in the same locality, and at 
the same time, by both bodies, since the question of re- 



132 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



union had been seriously agitated. The opportunity was 
taken to cultivate and strengthen the fraternal feelings 
which had sprung up between them. Joint religious ser- 
vices were held, and a joint communion was celebrated by 
vote of the two bodies. But, more important than all, each 
Assembly appointed a Committee of Fifteen, thirty in all, 
to consider and report a plan for the reunion of the two 
bodies. The Chairman of the Old School Committee was 
Rev. Jno. M. Krebs, of New York, D. D., and that of the New 
School was Rev. Thomas Brainerd, D. D., of Pliiladelphia. 

The appointment of this joint committee was the signal 
for a lively and wide-spread discussion of .the whole subject 
of reunion, its bearings, its propriety, utility and season- 
ableness, and the exact nature of the terms on which it 
should be attempted. Ultra Old School men doubted 
whether the New School was thoroughly Calvinistic and 
Presbyterian, and feared lest the terms of reunion should 
be made so loose as to admit of, and sanction, serious doc- 
trinal errors and unpresbyterian modes of action. Ultra 
New School men, on the contrary, were unwilling to risk 
the loss of the liberty of opinion which they enjoyed, on 
points which they considered unessential to the integrity 
of the Calvinistic system. And while there was a large 
and constantly increasing section of both churches, who 
stood between these extremes, who through lack of zeal for 
doctrinal niceties, or from a sentiment of charity that com- 
pletely bore down all fears and prejudices, were unconcerned 
about guarantees for doctrinal soundness or for liberty of 
opinion, it was manifest, from the beginning, that great 
weight must be given to these opposite ideas, if a harmoni- 
ous decision was reached, and a union formed, without lead 
ing to further and painful divisions. 

The death of Dr. Brainerd, during the summer of 1866, 
and the long, and finally fatal, illness of Dr. Krebs, the 
chairmen of each of the committees, deferred action until 
tlie following year. The committee held their first meet" 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



133 



ings, separately and jointly, in February, 1867. Rev. 
George F. Wiswell, D. D., of Philadelphia, was elected in 
place of Dr. Brainerd, and Rev. William Adams, D. D., of 
New York, was made chairman of the New School Commit- 
tee. Rev. C. C. Beatty, D. D., was made chairman of the 
Old School Committee. The conferences opened with much 
hesitation and embarrassment, which, however, under the 
influence of prayer, and fraternal intercourse, rapidly wore 
away, and the committee, after several meetings, agreed 
upon a plan which they submitted to their respective 
General Assemblies of 1867 : the one meeting in Rochester, 
and the other in Cincinnati. The chief interest of the re- 
port centered in the First or doctrinal, article which was as 
follows : 

First. — The reunion shall be effected on the doctrinal and 
ecclesiastical basis of our common standards. The Confes- 
sion of Faith shall continue to be sincerely received and 
adopted, as containing the system of doctrine taught in the 
Holy Scriptures, and its fair historic sense, as it is accepted 
by the two bodies, in opposition to Antinomianism and 
Fatalism, on the one hand, and to Arminianism and Pelagi- 
anism on the other, shall be regarded as the sense in which 
it is received and adopted ; and the Government and 
discipline of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, 
shall continue to be approved as containing the principles 
and rules of our polity." 

The remaining articles related to details of organization. 
It was provided, that the consent of three-fourths of the 
Presbyteries belonging to each of the two Assemblies, must 
be given to the plan within a year, in order to secure its adop- 
tion. These proposals were unanimously adopted and trans- 
mitted to the Pre^yteries by the New School Assembly ; 
they were also adopted by a very decided majority by 
the Old School Assembly, who, however, also passed a reso- 
lution distinctl3'' disclaiming any other purpose in their 
vote, than that of giving the Presbyteries the opportunity 
of deciding the question for themselves. 
12 



134 



PKESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



When the Presbyteries come to vote upon the plan in the 
ensuing fall, scarcely a tithe of those in the Old School 
body gave it their unqualified approval, and it was defeated 
in that branch of the Church by a very large majority. 
The New School Presbyteries by a large majority voted to 
approve the plan, but many of them objected to the vague- 
ness of the doctrinal term, as an insufficient guarantee for 
doctrinal liberty. 

Great discouragement was felt by the friends of the 
scheme, in both branches, at this result. And it seemed as 
if all specific efforts for reunion must be abandoned for the 
present. But the hopes that had received such a shock, 
were revived and carried to a higher point than ever, by the 
National Convention for a reunion of all the separated 
bodies of the Presbyterian Church, which was held in the 
city of Philadelphia, in November of the same year. 
This Convention, which was attended by leading men of the 
Old and New Schools, the United and the Reformed Presby- 
terian Churches, gave an opportunity for the discussion of 
the basis of reunion upon a still broader platform. The 
conclusions there reached, especially upon the doctrinal 
articles, showed that the two Schools were nearer together 
than the decisions of the Presbyteries just rendered, would 
indicate. 

Tills Convention was not more remarkable for the widely 
varying shades of Presbyterian sentiment which it brought 
into cordial relations, as for the enthusiasm, earnestness 
and gratifying success which attended its deliberations. It 
would seem as if the strong undercurrent of reunion, which 
had been obstructed, and dammed up b}^ the action of the 
Presbyteries, especially in the Old School Church, now 
broke vehemently over all restraints, and poured itself forth 
in a tide that could not be stemmed. Fuller guarantees for 
doctrinal soundness than even Old School men cared to 
have, were offered by New School men. By an amendment 
offered by Prof. Henry B. Smith, of Union Seminary, 



PRESB YTEKIANS IN AMERICA. 



135 



New York, subscription to the doctrinal basis of the Con- 
fession of Faith was described and defined as receiving the 
Confession in its historical, ''that is Reformed, or Calvinis- 
tic sense it was also by the vote of the New School dele- 
gates, that the highly Calvinistic Shorter Catechism was 
included in the proposed doctrinal basis, adopted by the 
Convention. Guarantees for liberty beyond, the limits of 
tliese terms were not demanded. Perhaps the great use of the 
Convention was to reveal the unexpected and uncontrollable 
strength of the hitherto latent feelings of sympathy and 
cordial Christian affection of Presbyterians for each other, 
in spite of their numerous and somewhat discreditable 
divisions. Where such feelings prevailed, technical objec- 
tions and difficulties in the way of reunion, it was foreseen, 
must eventually give way. 

The Reunion Committees of the two Assemblies now 
resumed their labors with a renewed hope of success. They 
modified their doctrinal article by inserting " the Smith 
amendment," as already described, and followed it up with 
a clause in the interest of liberty, proposed by the P^ev. Dr. 
Gurley. 

This celebrated addition, known as the Gurley amend- 
ment, read as follows : 

" It is also understood that various methods of viewing, 
stating, explaining and illustrating the doctrines of the 
Confession which do not impair the integrity of the Re- 
formed or Calvinistic system are to be freely allowed in 
the United Church, as they have hitherto been allowed in 
the separate Churches " 

A new article, called the Tenth, was introduced, by which 
the ii-ight was conceded to the individual Presb3^tery to go 
back of the credentials of a member applying for admission, 
and satisfy itself by examination, of his soundness ; at the 
same time leaving each Presbytery free to exercise the right 
r not as it saw fit. 

With this amended Report, the Committees appeared 



136 PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



n the General Assemblies of the Old School meeting m 
Alhanj, and the New School, in Harrisburg. Large major- 
ities and leading men in both bodies, were found to be in 
favor of adopting the Report ; but vigorous and able minor- 
ities in both contended, with such earnestness, for further 
modifications, that a harmonious adjustment seemed as 
remote as ever. In the New School Assembly, opposition 
was directed mainly to the Tenth article, and opportunity 
having been given before taking the vote, for the expression 
of dissent from any part of the basis, thirty-eight persona 
recorded their dissent from the Tenth article ; four persons 
were excused from voting, and then the Report on reunion 
was adopted unanimously. 

In the Assembly at Albany, opposition centered mainly 
on the explanatory clauses of the Second Article, p. e. the 
Gurley amendment.] This opposition was so earnest and 
powerful, that the majority sent a deputation, consisting 
of Rev. Drs. C. 0. Beatty and Y. D. Reed, and Elders 
Robert Carter and Henry Day, from Albany to Harrisburg, 
to represent to the New School Assembl}^ the delicacy and 
urgency of the situation, and to ask their consent to the 
omission of these clauses. Rules of order, however, made it 
impossible for the New School body, at that stage of the 
proceedings, to entertain a motion to reconsider, and the 
deputation was compelled to return, after a most cordial and 
respectful reception, without accomplishing their object. 

Notwithstanding their failure, the Report, unamended, was 
adopted by the Assembly at Albany, the vote on the first 
and most warmly contested article being 186 tfs 19. After- 
wards, however, by way of conciliating the minority, it was 
voted unanimously that the Assembly would prefer the basis 
with the explanatory clauses of the First article omitted; 
it was also resolved, that in adopting it they did not 
mean to give license to propagate doctrines, which have 
been condemned by either Assembly, nor to permit any 
Presbytery in the United States, to license or ordain to the 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 137 

work of the Ministry, any candidate who maintains any 
form of doctrine condemned by either Assembly. 

This action, received by telegraph in the New School 
Assembly, just as they were adjourning, at eleven o'clock 
at night, made an unpleasant impression. The Union men 
in the Old School Assembly however, were in dead earnest. 
A protest against the action on reunion was presented by 
fifty-one members of their body, charging the New School 
with dangerous doctrinal tendencies. The Assembly's reply 
to the protest recognizes ir the fullest and most unequivo- 
cal manner, the soundness of the New School body, on all 
the fundamentals of the Calvinistic system. 

The plan of the Joint Committees was once more sub* 
mitted to the vote of the Presbyteries. One bunded of the 
one hundred and thirteen New School Presbyteries adopted 
the plan as it stood. Yery few of the Old School Presby- 
teries approved of the plan without amendment, most of 
them reiterating the preference, expressed by the Albany 
Assembly, for the omission of the explanatory clauses from 
the doctrinal article, at the same time proposing to retain 
the Tenth Article, so much disliked by the decided men in 
the New School body. 

"When the Assemblies met in 1869, in New York City, 
the New School felt that, in adopting the Committee's plan 
with such a near approach to unanimity, they had done 
their part. It remained for the Old School body, whose 
Presbyteries had defeated that plan, to propose a new one. 
This responsibility the Old School Assembly promptly 
accepted, for it seemed a foregone conclusion, in spite of 
all untoward appearances, that reunion must take place, 
and that all obstacles must be removed now. 

On the very first day of its session, that Assembly 
appointed an entirely new Committee of Conference, on 
the subject, which was responded to by the immediate 
appointment of a new Committee on the part of the other 
Assembly. In seven days, these Committees matured a 

12* 



138 PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 

new plan, which was submitted simultaneously in both 
Assemblies, and adopted with but eight dissenting votes in 
the Old School, and unanimously by the New School 
body. 

The doctrinal article of this plan was as follows : 
"The reunion shall be effected on the doctrinal and 
ecclesiastical basis of our common standards : The Scrip- 
tures of the Old and New Testaments, shall be acknowledged 
to be the inspired word of God, the only infallible rule of 
faith and practice ; the Confession of Faith shall continue 
to be sincerely received and adopted, as containing the 
system of doctrine taught in the Holy Scriptures ; and thb 
government and discipline of the Presbyterian Church in 
tlie United States, shall be approved as containing the prin- 
ciples and rules of our policy." 

No reference was made to the right of examination^ which 
as recognized in the Tenth Article, in tlie plan of 1868, had 
caused such divergence of sentiment. The matter was left as 
the Form of Government leaves it — indeterminate. Certain 
Concurrent Declarations were also appended to the basis, not 
as parts of the plan nor of binding force, yet as just and 
equitable arrangements, to which both bodies were expected 
to assent. These declarations asserted the right of all min- 
isters and churches to an equal standing in the United 
Church, with that which they held in the separate bodies. 
Imperfectly organized churches were counselled and ex- 
pected to become thoroughly Presbyterian within five 
years, and no other such churches would hereafter be 
received. No rule or precedent which does not stand 
approved b}^ both the bodies, should be of any authority in 
the re-united body, except as affecting property rights. 
The catalogues of the publications of both bodies should be 
revised, so as to exclude all invidious references to past 
controversies. The Theological Seminaries, it was sug- 
gested, might transfer their connections to the Synods 
adjacent, all Seminaries being counselled to come under 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



139 



Assembly or Synodical control. The second Sabbath in 
September, was also named as a day of prayer for divine 
guidance. 

None of these " declarations " were overtured to the 
Presbyteries. It was resolved to send down for their 
action, the single doctrinal article as above recited, and 
each Presbyter}' was ordered to vote upon it, and forward 
the result of the vote to the stated clerk of its own Assem- 
bly, before the 1st day of November, following. The 
two Assemblies would adjourn to meet in the city of Pitts- 
burg, on the second Wednesday of November, when and 
where, the stated clerks should report the vote, and if two- 
thirds of the Presbyteries in each branch had voted 
affirmatively, the union would be of bindmg force, and the 
two Assemblies should take action accordingly. 

This report on reunion was adopted in the New School 
Assemblj^, by a unanimous rising vote, and in the Old School 
Assembly by 276- to 8 votes. The vote of the Presbyteries 
was a triumphant endorsement of the Assemblies' plan. Of 
the one hundred and forty-four Old School, one hundred 
and twenty-eight answered in the affirmative, and three in 
the negative; of the one hundred and thirteen New School 
every one sent up official answers in the affirmative. There 
was a minority of one in each of three New School Presby- 
teries, in all other cases the vote was unanimous. 

Nothing now remained but to give formal shape to the 
will of both bodies, thus emphatically expressed. The tw^o 
Assemblies accordingly met in Pittsburg, on the tenth of 
November, and after making official record of the action 
of the Presbyteries and communicating the results in due 
form to each other, dissolved their separate sessions, and 
amid the most intense manifestations of joy and en- 
thusiasm, united in a joint procession and a meeting in the 
Third Presb3'terian Church, where several hours were spent 
in prayer, singing and addresses of congratulation. A 
resolution was adopted, that it is incumbent upon the 



140 



PRESBYTERIANS IN AMERICA. 



Presbyterian Church, as thus united, to make a special 
offering to the treasury of the Lord of five millions of 
dollars, as a memorial of the reunion. 

Thus closed a series of efforts, stretching over a period of 
three years and six months. The fears of the rigid men on 
the one side, and of the liberal on the other, exercised a 
constant influence upon the deliberations, delayed the 
progress of the movement, and shaped somewhat the final 
form of the basis. But while they could not prevent the re- 
sult upon which the heart of the Church, in both branches, 
was set, it is wonderful how at last their opposition was 
almost entirely overcome, and that the acquiescence in the 
result was so nearl}" absolutely universal. The usual con- 
comitant of an Ecclesiastical Union, the splitting off of 
fragments large or small, and the multiplying rather than 
the diminution of sects, was spared to the Christian world 
In this case. It is believed not an individual minister or 
Church — unless it be one or two partly congregational 
Churches — has left the body on account of reunion. The 
great size, the wealth, and the high standing in the Christian 
world of the body thus formed, exert a force of gravity 
which counteracts the centrifugal and separatist tendencjies 
that might otherwise appear. Smaller Presbyterian bodies 
are likely rather to be drawn from their individual orbits 
and gathered like aerolites on the larger body. 

The influence of this happy settlement of protracted and 
grievous denominational estrangements, upon the divided 
parts of the Protestant Church at large, must prove health- 
ful. On all hands, this greatest of Ecclesiastical reuniona 
6;nce the dividing era of the Reformation, is viewed as the 
harbinger of a broader charity, and a wider and more com- 
prehensive union among Christians. 

The First General Assembly of the reunited Church w^as 
held in the First Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia, of 
which the late Rev. Albert Barnes, was pastor. This body, 
numbering 605 commissioners and delegates, is the 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 141 



largest Presbyterian Assembly, ever held in any part of 
the Christian world and represented the largest Presbyterian 
Church in existence. Accredited representatives from the 
Presbyterian Churches in England, Scotland, Ireland and 
Canada, besides the Lutheran, Congregational and other 
bodies in America, were in attendance. A full daily phono- 
graphic report of its proceedings was published. The 
necessary work of redistricting the Synods, and of consoli- 
dating the Boards and Committees was conducted with 
unusual harmony and dispatch, for so great a body. No 
jar or friction was perceptible, and the denominational lines 
so sharply drawn, a third of a century ago, disappeared 
under the magic breath of the spirit of Christian love. 

The statistics of the now United Church for 1873 were: 
35 synods, 172 presbyteries, 4534 ministers, 4802 churches; 
number of baptisms, 25,144 ; number of communicants, 
472,023 ; of persons in Sunday-schools, 482,622 ; contri- 
butions for church expenses, ministerial support and be- 
nevolent objects, $9,625,030. 



THE SOUTHEKiN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 

This body — represented by '.^The General Assembly of the 
Presbyterian Church in the United States/' and consisting of 
some. 1500 churches, 1000 ministers and 100^000 communi- 
cants — :SQ^arated from the Old School body and organized 
a distinct Assembly at Augusta, Georgia, December, 1861. 

The occasion which compelled this separation was a 
political deliverance of the General Assembly at Philadel- 
phia, on the 28th May, 1861, declaring that, "in the spirit 
of Christian patriotism," the Assembly "do hereby declare 
and acknowledge our obligation to promote and perpetuate, 
so far as in us lies, the integrity of these United States, and 



142 SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



to strengthen, uphold and encourage the Federal Govern- 
ment in the exercise of all its functions under our noble 
constitution, and to this constitution in all its provisions, 
requirements and principles we profess our unabated I07- 
alty." 

That such a deliverance by a Church court involves a 
dangerous usurpation of power, and is inconsistent with 
the fundamental idea of Presbyterianisra, was then the de- 
liberate judgment, not only of the Southern Presbyterians, 
who were thereby obliged to renounce either their allegiance 
to their de facto civil government or their allegiance to 
their Church, but the judgment also of the most enlightened 
and thoughtful men in the Northern Church. 

Dr. Charles Hodge, of Princeton, with fifty-seven others, 
including the Moderator of the Assembly, entered their 
most earnest protest against the right of the General Assem- 
bly to make any such political deliverance in the following, 
among other emphatic terms : 

" We protest, because we deny the right of the General 
Assembly to decide the political question to what govern- 
ment the allegiance of Presbyterians, as citizens, is due, 
and its right to make that decision a condition of member- 
ship in our Church." 

That the paper adopted by the Assembly does decide 
the political question just stated is, in our judgment, unde- 
niable. . . . That the action of the General Assembly in 
the premises does not only decide the political question 
referred to, but makes that decision a term of membership 
in our Church, is no less clear. ... It puts into the mouth 
of all represented in this body a declaration of loyalty and 
allegiance to the Federal Government. -But such a declara- 
tion made by our members in what are called the seceded 
States is treasonable. Presbyterians under the jurisdiction 
of those States cannot make this declaration. They are 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



143 



therefore forced to choose between allegiance to the State 
and allegiance to the Church/' 

"The General Assembly, in thus deciding a political 
question, and in making that decision practically a condi- 
tion of membership in the Church, has, in our judgment, 
violated the constitution of the Church and usurped the pre- 
rogatives of the divine Master 

With these views of Dr. Hodge in his protest the ecclesi- 
astics of the Southern Church fully concurred. In a solemn 
Address to all the churches of Jesus Christ throughout the 
earth/^ issued by the Southern General Assembly at its 
organization as explanatory of the cause of their separa- 
tion, December, 1861,. it is declared : 

" The only conceivable condition, therefore, upon which 
the Church of the North and the South could remain to- 
gether as one body, with any prospect of success, is the 
rigorous exclusion of the questions and passions of the 
forum from its halls of debate. This is what always ought 
to be done. The provinces of Church and State are per- 
fectly distinct, and the one has no right to usurp the juris- 
diction of the other. The State is a natural institute, 
founded in the constitution of man as moral and social, and 
designed to realize the idea of justice. It is the society of 
rights. The Church is a supernatural institution, founded 
in the facts of redemption, and is designed to realize the 
idea of grace. It is the society of the redeemed. The 
State aims at social order, the Church at spiritual holiness. 
The State looks to the visible and outward, the Church is 
concerned for the invisible and inward. The badge of 
the State's authority is the sword, by which it becomes a 
terror to evil-doers and a praise to them that do well. The 
badge of the Church's authority is the keys, by which it 
opens and shuts the Kingdom of Heaven, according as 
men are believing or impenitent. The power of the 



144 SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



Church is exclusively spiritual^ that of the State includes 
the exercise of force. The Constitution of the Church is 
a Divine revelation, the Constitution of the State must be 
determined by human reason and the course of providential 
events. The Church has no right to construct or modify 
a government for the State, and the State has no right to 
frame a creed or polity for the Church. 

" Had these principles been steadily maintained by the 
Assembly at Philadelphia, it is possible that the ecclesias- 
tical separation of the North and South might have been 
deferred for years to come. Our Presbyteries, many of 
them, clung with tenderness to the recollections of the past. 
Sacred memories gathered around that venerable Church 
which had breasted many a storm and trained our fathers 
for glory .^^ 

It will be perceived, therefore, that the thoughtful men, 
both of the Northern and the Southern sections of the 
Church, practically concurred in the judgment that the 
deliverance of 1861 compelled the separation. Nor was 
the issue of slavery or anti-slavery really involved in the 
primary cause of the separation, as has been so persistently 
asserted. For in the same "Address'' the Southern Assem- 
bly declares, in December, 1861, before the question of 
slavery had become an issue of the war : 

" In the first place, we would have it distinctly under- 
stood that, in our ecclesiastical capacity, we are neither the 
friends nor the foes of slavery — that is to say, we have no 
commission either to propagate or abolish it. The policy 
of its existence or non-existence is a question which exclu- 
sively belongs to the State. We have no right, as a Church, 
to enjoin it as a duty or to condemn it as sin. Our busi- 
ness is with the duties that spring from the relation — the 
duties of the masters on the one hand, and of their slaves 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 14:5 



on the other. These duties we are to proclaim and enforce 
with spiritual sanctions.^^ 

Such, then, were the grounds of this separation amid the 
opening strifes of the unhappy civil war. Obviously, this 
schism in the Presbyterian Church, like that of the Epis- 
copal Church, might, by a kind and judicious policy, have 
been healed at the close of the war. But so far from this, 
the General Assembly at Pittsburg, in 1865, as though 
determined to give permanency to the separation, erected 
in the following ordinance an impassable barrier between 
the two bodies : 

It is hereby ordered that all our Presbyteries examine 
every minister applying for admission from any Presby- 
tery or other ecclesiastical body in the Southern States on 
the following points : 

"1. Whether he has in any way, directly or indirectly, 
of his own free will and consent, or without external con- 
straint, been concerned at any time in aiding or counte- 
nancing the rebellion and the war v/hich has been waged 
against the United States ; and if it be found by his own 
confession, or from sufficient testimony, that he has been 
so concerned, that he be required to confess and forsake his 
sin in this regard before he shall be received. 

" 2. Whether he holds that the system of negro slavery 
in the South is a Divine institution, and that it is ^the 
peculiar mission of the Southern Church to conserve the 
institution of slavery as there maintained,' and if it be 
found that he holds either of these doctrines, that he be not 
received without renouncing and forsaking these errors. 

"3. Church sessions are also ordered to examine all 
applicants for church-membership by persons from the 
Southern States, or who have been living in the South 
since the rebellion, concerning their conduct and princi- 
ples on the points above specified ; and if if be found that 

1 K 



146 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



of their own free will they have taken up arms against the 
United States, or that they hold slavery to be an ordinance 
of God, as thus stated, such persons shall not be admitted 
to the communion of the Church till they give evidence 
of repentance for their sin, and renounce their error.'^ 

It has been claimed, however, and asserted not only by 
the commissioners sent to Louisville in 1870, but even 
officially declared, by implication, in a minute of the 
JSTorthern Assembly of 1870, that these remarkable ordi- 
nances of 1865, together with all that resulted from them 
in the expulsion of the synods of Kentucky and Missouri 
in 1866-7, were in effect repealed by the "concurrent decla- 
ration of the two Assemblies that met in New York (prior 
to re-union), that no rule or precedent which does not stand 
approved by both bodies shall be of any authority in the 
reunited body/' But aside from the incongruity of any 
such indirect and merely incidental repeal of an act, or 
series of acts, impugning the Christian standing of a vast 
body of people, this claim of repeal for lack of concur- 
rence by both Assemblies very remarkably overlooks the 
fact that while the Old School Assembly at Pittsburg, in 
1865, was enacting the extraordinary ordinance for exami- 
nation just cited, the New School Assembly at Brooklyn 
the very same week also enacted the following : 

"In the event that any of the ministers referred to in 
the overture (i. e., Southern ministers) shall apply for ad- 
mission into these Presbyteries, the Assembly advises the 
Presbyteries not to admit them, or in any way recognize them 
as ambassadors of the Cross of Christ, until they have given 
satisfactory evidence that they have sincerely repented of this 
sin^' (of aiding or countenancing the rebellion). 

Thus it appears that, in fact, the "concurrent declara- 
tion" does not meet the case of the excluding ordinances 
of 1865 at all, since these ordinances "c?o stand approved 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 147 

hy both of the bodiesJ^ And, therefore, as the Southern 
churches were compelled originally to separate, so they are 
still compelled, under the ordinances of 1865-6-7, to make 
the separation permanent. 

It would tend only to mislead the Christian public, how- 
ever, to stop here and leave the impression that the differ- 
ences which separate the Southern from the Northern 
Presbyterians are chiefly these questions of ecclesiastical 
punctilio. For, though holding the same symbols of faith 
and Church order, and even the same constitutional rules, 
the issues between them will be found, on examination, to 
involve principles fundamental in the Presbyterian faith 
and order. Nor can any pressure of popular sentiment in 
favor of union ever harmonize such differences. The true 
conception of Christian brotherly affection is not the with- 
drawal of all protest against error and witness for the 
truth, but of peaceful separation when differences are fun- 
damental. The true model of Christian brotherhood is 
Abraham, the Father of the visible Church. "Let there 
be no strife, I pray thee. Separate thyself from me : go 
to the right or left, and I will take the opposite direction.'' 

So far from being mere inconsiderable differences arising 
from temporary ill-humor or the idiosyncrasies of a few 
prominent men, as the popular judgment has it, and as 
men of feeble convictions and latitudinarian views of the 
Church regard it, the differences between the Southern and 
the Northern bodies of Presbyterians as now constituted 
are as wide as the differences between either and the other 
evangelical churches. 

In the first place it is well known that prior to 1861, 
and even as far back as the disruption of 1837, the South- 
ern portion of the Old School Presbyterian Church (with 
a few exceptions on either side) was even far more earnest, 
more uncompromising and more united in antagonism to 



148 SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 

the " Broad Church errors of the New School body in 
regard to the doctrine and order than the Northern portion. 
Indeed, but for the Southern portion of the Church, the 
testimony of 1837 could never have been maintained. 
Accordingly, it will be observed, in reviewing the pro- 
ceedings of the ten years subsequent to 1860, that the 
movement first to exclude, and then to keep out, the South- 
ern churches, proceeded pari passu with the movement for 
bringing back the New School body. The intimation of 
any such purpose of reunion was indeed denounced as an 
uncharitable suspicion in 1861-2, but it will be difficult 
to find any other solution of the extraordinary ordinances 
of 1865, and the no less extraordinary expulsion of the 
synods of Kentucky and Missouri for resisting these ordi- 
nances, than that the motive for and the purpose of these 
ordinances was, by keeping out the South, to break down 
the power of resistance in the Church against the reunion 
with the New School and the withdrawal of the testimony 
of 1837. 

It is of no force, as against this view of the case, that 
the Southern Assembly had in 1864 received the United 
Synod (New School of the Southern States), for that union 
was made really upon the basis of a solemn declaration in 
regard to the issues involved in the conflicts of 1837 — 
viz. : " Concerning The fall of man and original sin — The 
imputation of sin and of righteousness — The Divine permis- 
sion of sin — The Atonement — Regeneration — Justification 
and the Visible Church as Christ's agent for propagating the 
GospeV^ Which declaration, framed at a conference of 
both parties exhibiting an entire agreement of views, was 
reported to the Assembly with the following preface stating 
its purpose : 

"Inasmuch as some have been supposed to hold the 
system of doctrines and Church order in different senses. 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 149 



the General Assembly and the United Synod do further 
adopt the following Declaration, touching former grounds 
of debate, in order to manifest our hearty agreement, to 
remove suspicions and offences, to restore full confidence 
between brethren, and to honor God's saving truth/' 

And though this Declaration^^ was not formally made 
the basis of a union, because it was held that the General 
Assembly has no right to adopt any other doctrinal basis 
than the standards, yet it was an abundant guarantee to 
the Assembly (having been approved by the Presbyteries 
on both sides) that such union involved no withdrawal of 
the testimony of 1837. 

Whatever, therefore, vrere the differences which sepa- 
rated the Old School and New School bodies for thirty 
years, the same differences now separate the Southern from 
the reunited Northern body. 

In the second place, anterior to 1861, as well as since, 
the Southern Presbyterian churches have held in a much 
fuller sense than the Northern the jure divino view of 
Presbyterianism. This is the view universally taught in 
their schools and held generally by their pastors and 
Church courts. With exceptions on both sides, the issue 
between the Southern ecclesiastics and the Northern has 
been the same as that which created the rupture between 
the Westminster Assembly and the Parliament which 
called it to advise in the reconstruction of the English 
Church. While the Westminster Assembly, after tho- 
rough examination of the Scriptures, concluded that the 
Presbyterial Government of the Church and its ordinances 
were by direct authority of Christ the King, the Parlia- 
ment stubbornly refused to accept Presbytery on any other 
ground than that " it is lawful and agreeable to the word 
of God that the Church be governed by congregational, 
classical and synodical assemblies." This discrepancy of 

13* 



150 SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



views seems to have in some degree crept into the stand- 
ards of the Presbyterian Church as accepted in the United 
States. While the Confession of Faith (chap. 30) and the 
Larger Catechism (Ques. 45) declares fully with the West- 
minster Assembly, " The Lord Jesus as King and Head 
of his Church hath therein appointed a governments^ etc., 
and — 

Christ executeth the office of a King in calling out of 
the world a people to himself, and giving them officerSj laws 
and censures whereby he visibly governs them.^' 

Yet on the other hand the Form of Governments^ 
(chap. 8) seems to speak rather the non-committal lan- 
guage of the Parliament : " We hold it to be expedient and 
agreeable to Scripture and the practice of the primitive Chris- 
tians that the Church be governed by congregational, Pres- 
byterial and synodical assemblies." 

Now, the Southern churches may be said to stand by 
the jure divino theory of the Confession of Faith and the 
Catechism, while the Northern churches accept the looser 
expediency view of chap. 8th of the " Form of Govern- 
ment." The wide practical divergence of the two views 
is apparent in all the more notable utterances of the North- 
ern and Southern Assemblies after the separation. 

Thus, the Southern Assembly declares in reference to 
the natural functions and practical relations of the Church : 

In regard to conflicts between existing governments", or 
as to movements in society, peaceful or otherwise, to effect 
political changes, the Church as such has no more control 
over them than it has over the polls of the country. If 
it has authority to uphold on the one side, it has equal 
power to condemn on the other ; if to suppress a politi- 
cal movement, then also to instigate it. In truth, it has 
neither, and to assert the contrary is to corrupt the Church 
in its principles, for ever embroil it with the strifes of the 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



151 



world and plunge it headlong into ruin." (See Minutes, 
1865, p. 371.) 

" The Assembly would declare anew the doctrine of our 
time-honored Confession, that Christ alone is King and 
Head of his Church, and that all ordinances of worship 
binding on us are ordained by him alone ; that there are 
two commonwealths, equally appointed by God, the civil, 
whose object is to protect the persons and property and 
promote the well-being of men as they are members of 
civil society ; and the religious, the commonwealth of 
Israel, whose object it is to train men, as they are sinners, 
for glory and immortality. Although these exist together 
in this world, each is independent of the other in its own 
sphere.'' (See Minutes, 1866, pp. 13, 14.) 

"This argument of visibly realizing the spiritual unity 
of the Lord's people, is enforced by the peculiar circum- 
stances of the times in which we live, and by the nature 
of the controversies which now agitate the Church. The 
old conflict for the spirituality and independence of the 
Church is, to the amazement of many, renewed in our day 
and upon our own continent. The battle fought genera- 
tions ago, by the Melvilles, Gillespies and Hendersons of 
Scotland, is reopened with singular violence, and the old 
banner is again floating over us with its historic inscrip- 
tion, * For Christ's covenant and crown.' Upon no one 
subject is the mind of this Assembly more clearly ascer- 
tained, upon no one doctrine is there a more solid or 
perfect agreement amongst those whom 'this Assembly 
represents, than the non-secular and non-political charac- 
ter of the Church of Jesus Christ." (See Minutes, 1866, 
pp. 30, 31.) 

An elaborate declaration of the doctrines and principles 
of the Southern Churches, prepared by the synod of Ken- 
tucky and accepted by the Assembly of 1867, may be 



152 SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



found in the appendix to the minutes of that year, and in 
Vol. lOtli of Wilson's Historical Almanac, pp. 297-316. 
A careful study of this paper must satisfy any one ac- 
quainted with the views of the Northern Presbyterians 
that the difference between the two bodies is radical as to 
some of the most practical questions of Christian duty. 
There is room for but a single extract : 

" The doctrine of the kingly office of Christ is no ab- 
stract theory of theology, but of the very first practical 
importance in the gospel system, since to his office as a 
king, his prophetic and priestly offices stand related as 
means to an end. He is a teaching prophet and an aton- 
ing priest that he may be a reigning king. And his kingly 
office stands related to the government and discipline of 
the Church as his prophetic and priestly offices to the 
ordinances of the word and sacraments. While, indeed, 
the acceptance of the doctrine of his kingly office is not 
essential to the faith that is unto salvation in the sense 
in which the acceptance of the doctrine of his priestly 
office as exhibiting our justifying righteousness is essen- 
tial, yet the obligation to present truly the doctrine 
of Christ's kingly office in the government and disci- 
pline of the Church to the faith of his people is of like 
force with the obligation to present truly the doctrine 
of his prophetic and priestly offices in, the word and 
sacraments. 

" Therefore, the avoidance of all admixture of human 
maxims, policies and expediencies in the administration of 
the government and discipline of the Church is a duty of 
the same obligation as to avoid the admixture of human 
philosophies and theories with the dispensation of the 
word, or of human fancies with the dispensation of the 
sacraments. 

"It is therefore not only incompetent to the Church 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 153 

courts, but positively a perversion of the truth, that they 
shall assume to consider and determine any other ques- 
tions than those which relate to the government, order 
and discipline of Christ's visible kingdom ; or to deter- 
mine these on grounds aside from the word of God ; or 
to speak in Christ's name and by his authority, other- 
wise than to the fliith and conscience of his people, con- 
cerning things to be obeyed as enjoined by the law of 
Christ. 

" Therefore, the Church has manifestly no commission 
either to discharge any functions of the State, or to direct, 
advise or assist the State ; nor has the Church any light in 
regard to the affairs of the State which the State has not 
already ; nor, since her authority is spiritual and resting 
on moral suasion only, has it any adaptation to the pur- 
poses of a government of force. Neither can the State 
have any commission from God to discharge the functions 
of the Church, nor the ability to do so; since — aside from 
the fact that its compulsory power is inapplicable to things 
of religion — even though the State may have the advan° 
tage of the inspired word of God current among its citi- 
zens to give additional clearness and force to the teachings 
of nature and reason, yet the State has not the special illu- 
mination of the Holy Spirit, which alone can interpret 
the word for the purposes of the Church. Nor is any- 
thing plainer from experience than that the unconverted 
statesman, accepting the word of God intellectually merely, 
however he may thereby be made wiser as to natural 
things, is not made more competent to legislate for the 
Church than though he were merely a refined and enlight- 
ened Pagan. Nor has anything more certainly tended to 
enfeeble the spiritual life of the Church than the mistake 
of courting the favor and seeking the alliance of rulers and 
statesmen, who merely accept intellectually, and therefore 



154 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



treat respectfully, the word of Christ and his ordinances, 
as though thereby the kingdom of Christ can be strength- 
ened/^ 

It may serve to complete this side of the proposed con- 
trast to cite the following extract from the of&cial response 
of the Assembly of 1870 at Louisville to the proposition 
for a renewal of correspondence and ultimately organic 
reunion : 

1. "Both the wings of the now united Assembly, dur- 
ing their separate existence before the fusion, did fatally 
complicate themselves with the State in political utter- 
ances deliberately pronounced year after year, and which, 
in our judgment, w^ere a sad betrayal of the cause and 
kingdom of our common Lord and Plead. We believe it 
to be solemnly incuQibent upon the Northern Presbyte- 
rian Church, not Avith reference to us, but before the Chris- 
tian world, before our Divine Master and King, to purge 
itself of this error, and by public proclamation of the 
truth to place the crown once more upon the head of Jesus 
Christ as the alone King in Zion. In default of which 
the Southern Presbyterian Church, which has already 
suffered much in maintaining the independence and 
spirituality of the Redeemer's kingdom upon earth, feels 
constrained to Bear public testimony against this defection 
of our late associates from the truth. Nor can we, by 
official correspondence even, consent to blunt the edge 
of this our testimony concerning the very nature and 
mission of the Church as a purely spiritual body among 
men. 

2. " The union now consummated between the Old and 
New School Assemblies, North, was accomplished by 
methods which, in our judgment, involve a total surren- 
der of all the great testimonies of the Church for the fun- 
damental doctrines of grace at a time when, the victory of 



SOUTHERN" PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 155 

truth over error hung long in the balance. The united 
Assembly stands, of necessity, upon an allowed latitude 
of interpretation of the standards, and must come at length 
to embrace nearly all shades of doctrinal belief." Turning 
now to the contemporaneous deliverances of the Northern 
Assemblies, the irreconcilable difference of views between 
the two becomes at once manifest. 

The action of the Old School Assembly in 1861 has 
been already cited. Here is the action of 1862, assuming 
to instruct the civil government : 

" It is the clear and solemn duty of the national govern- 
ment to preserve, at whatever cost, the national Union and 
Constitution, to maintain the laws in their supremacy, to 
crush force by force,' ^ etc., etc. (Minutes Old ScJiool As- 
sembly, 1862, p. 625.) 

In the same year the General Assembly (New School) 
gave utterance to the following : 

^'Besolvedy 4. That while we have been utterly shocked 
at the deep depravity of the men who have planned and 
matured this rebellion, and who are now clad in arms, 
manifested in words and deeds, there is another class found 
in the loyal States who have excited a still deeper loath- 
ing — some in Congress, some high in civil life and some in 
the ordinary walks of business — who never utter a manly 
thought or opinion in favor of the government but they 
follow it, by way of comment, with two or three smooth 
apologies for Southern insurrectionists, presenting the dif- 
ference between an open and avowed enemy in the field 
and a secret and insidious foe in the bosom of his own 
family. 

"Resolved, 5. That, in our opinion, this whole insurrec- 
tionary movement can be traced to one primordial root, 
and to one only— African Slavery and the love of it, 



15G 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 



and a determination to make it perpetual ; and while we 
look upon this war as having one ^i^and end in view — the 
restoration of the Union by crushing out the last living 
and manifested fibre of rebellion — we hold that every- 
thing — the institution of slavery, if need be — must be 
made to bend to this one great purpose, and while under 
the influence of humanity and Christian benevolence we 
may commiserate the condition of the ruined rebels once 
in fraternity with ourselves, but now — should the case 
occur — despoiled of all that makes the world dear to them, 
we must be at the same time constrained to feel that the 
retribution has been self-inflicted, and must add, 'Fiat 
justitia, ruat coelumJ (^Minutes, 1862.) 

And in 1863 to the following: "That the government 
of these United States, as provided for by the Constitu- 
tion, is not only founded upon the great doctrine of human 
rights as vested by God in the individual man, but is also 
expressly declared to be the supreme civil authority in the 
land, for ever excluding the modern doctrine of secession 
as a civil or political right ; that, since the existing rebel- 
lion finds no justification in the facts of the case or the 
Constitution of the United States, in any law human or 
divine, the Assembly can regard it only as treason against 
the nation and a most offensive sin in the sight of God, 
justly exposing its authors to the retributive vengeance of 
earth and heaven ; that this rebellion, in its origin, history 
and measures, has been distinguished by those qualities 
which most sadly evince the depravity of our nature, 
especially in seeking to establish a new nationality on this 
continent based on the perpetual enslavement and oppres- 
sion of a weak and long-injured race ; that the national 
forces are, in the view of this Assembly, called out, not to 
wage war against another government, but to suppress 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 157 

insurrection, preserve the supremacy of law and order and 
save the country from anarchy and ruin/^ 

So again, in 1864 : the Old School Assembly felt free to 
make the following deliverance : It is our judgment that 
the recent events of our history, and the present condition 
of our Church and country, furnish manifest tokens that 
the time has at length come, in the providence of God, lohen 
it is his will that every vestige of human slavery among us 
should he effaced, and thcd every Christian man should ad- 
dress himself with industry and earnestness to his appropri- 
ate loart in the 2')erformance of this great duty. . . . Under 
the influence of the most incomprehensible infatuation of 
wickedness, those who were most interested in the perpetu- 
ation of slavery have taken away every motive for its further 
toleration. . . . 

" It is the President's declared policy not to consent to 
the reorganization of civil government within the seceded 
States upon any other basis than that of emancipation/^ 

And the iS"ew School Assembly, in 1865, the following: 
^' In Andrew Johnson, so unexpectedly called to the chair 
of our martyred Chief, the Assembly recognize a man dis- 
tinguished for a long course of earnest effort to elevate the 
masses, and for a steady, consistent patriotism that neither 
the power nor the favor of a treasonable oligarchy has 
been able successfully to assail or seduce. AYe desire to 
pledge to him, as our constitutional Chief Magistrate, our 
confidence and support in his efforts to vindicate the 
majesty of law ; maintain the national government in its 
just supremacy ; destroy the spirit and counteract the 
workings of the evil system that created this war ; inspire 
a just appreciation of the crime of treason and a true loy- 
alty to the government in the breasts of the masses of the 
white population of the South ; and extejid to the colored 
u 



158 SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 

citizens of that section the practical enjoyment of those 
personal and political rights announced in the Declaration 
of Independence, but denied to them by a despotic aris- 
tocracy/' [Minutes, 1865.) 

And the following in 1866: ^* And, as promoting this 
end, which far transcends any mere political or party ob- 
ject, we rejoice that the active functions of the Freedman's 
Bureau are still continued, and especially that the Civil 
Rights Bill has become the law" of the land. In respect 
to the concession of the rio;ht of sufPrao;e to the colored 
race, this Assembly adheres to the resolution passed by 
our Assembly of 1865 {Minutes, p. 42): ^That the col- 
ored man should in this country enjoy the right of suf- 
frage in common with all other men is but a simple dic- 
tate of justice. The Assembly cannot perceive any good 
reason why he should be deprived of this right on the 
ground of his color or his race. Even if suffrage may 
not be universal, let it be at least impartial.' 

2. In case such imj^artial suffrage is not conceded, that 
we may still reap the legitimate fruits of our national vic- 
tory over secession and slavery, and that treason and rebel- 
lion may not enure to the direct political advantage of the 
guilty, we judge it to be a simple act of justice that the 
constitutional basis of representation in Congress should 
be so far altered as to meet the exigencies growing out of 
the abolition of slavery ; and we likewise hold it to be the 
solemn duty of our national Executive and Congress to 
adopt only such method of reconstruction as shall efiPectu- 
ally protect all loyal persons in the States lately in revolt. 
{Minutes, 1866.) 

" 3. As loyalty is the highest civic virtue and treason 
the highest civic crime, so it is necessary for the due vin- 
dication and satisfaction of national justice that the chief 



SOUTHERN PRESBYTEEIAN CHURCH. 



159 



fomenters and representatives of the rebellion should, by 
due course and process of law, be visited with condign 
punishment/^ {Minutes, 1866.) 

From these citations in contrast, and more particularly 
from an official tract recently issued, entitled The Dis- 
tinctive Principles of the Presbyterian Church, commonly 
called the Southern Presbyterian Church,'^ the following may 
be enumerated as among the more distinctive principles 
of the Southern body, while accepting the same symbols 
of doctrine and order as the Northern Church : 

1. More rigid adherence to the doctrinal symbols of 
Westminster, discarding all theories of "progress'^ and 
of "advanced thought as inapplicable to doctrinal teach- 
ings derived directly from the infallible word. 

2. More rigid adherence to the views of the Scottish 
Reformers concerning the nature and duty of the Church 
as a witness-bearer against all false teaching, and discard- 
ing all "Broad Church^' schemes of comprehension as 
incompatible with the nature and purpose of the visible 
Church. 

3. Asserting the Church of Christ, organized and visi- 
ble, as an essential element of the gospel, and that the 
sinner born again is born into a visible family of God, 
with new relations not only to Christ, but also to Christ's 
organized body. 

4. Asserting the kingly office of Christ in his Church 
as a great practical truth wdiich necessitates the jure divino 
character of all Church government and ordinances of 
worship. 

5. Asserting a strict construction of the Constitution 
of the Church, and a scriptural administration of the gov- 
ernment and ordinances, as essential to purity of doctrine 
as well as of Christian liberty. 



160 



REFORMED PRESBYTERIANS. 



6. The absolute spirituality and independency of Christ's 
visible kingdom as against all tendencies to employ the 
Church and her agencies in the service of secular govern- 
ments^ or to accept secular aid in support of the Churcii, 
or to tolerate the interference of the secular power with 
the spiritual affairs of the Church. 

The statistics of the Southern General Assembly to 
May, 1874, were: synods, 12; presbyteries, 64; minis- 
ters and licentiates, 1056 ; candidates, 199 ; churches, 1764 ; 
communicants, 105,956 ; baptisms, 6266 ; S. S. scholars, 
60,293 ; moneys contributed for church purposes, minis- 
ters' salaries and benevolent objects, $1,111,461. 



REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 

In 1588 the Scotch Protestants entered into an associa- 
tion which they denominated " The Covenant.'' The object 
of this arrangement was to protect themselves against an 
expected invasion from Spain by the famous " invincible 
armada." The union of the crowns of Scotland and Eng- 
land in 1603 resulted in a hierarchy, which was deemeri 
dangerous, in the last degree, to the Presbyterian interests. 
This united in still closer bonds the friends of parity, and 
of ecclesiastical liberty. In 1637 the new liturgy, modelled 
after the English, was ordered to be introduced into the 
churches of Scotland. The most determined resistance 
ensued, which terminated in a new covenant the year fol 



REFORMED PRESBYTERIANS. 



161 



lowing. While Charles I. and the Parliament were con- 
tending, the Protestants in Scotland entered into " a solemn 
league and covenant" with the English Parliament, by 
which the independence of the Presbyterian churches was 
confirmed. On the restoration of the Stuarts in 1661, this 
covenant was abolished. These successive struggles seemed 
to have engendered a habit of making firm compacts for 
maintaining what they considered important principles ; a 
habit which continues till this day. 

At the accession of William and Mary in 1689, Episco- 
pacy was established in England and Ireland, and Presby- 
terianism in Scotland. 

A portion of the Scottish Kirk declined to avail them- 
selves of an establishment of this kind, and covenanted to 
resist it, and protested that it was at variance with the 
"solemn league and covenant" which they considered a 
part of the constitution of the empire. They maintained 
that the civil rulers had usurped an authority over the 
church which conflicted with the proper headship of the 
Redeemer. 

For fifteen or sixteen years these staunch and determined 
men remained without pastors, preserving their distinct 
social existence by uniting in praying societies, and meeting 
statedly for religious worship. 

In 1706 the Rev. John MacMillan joined them from the 
Established Church. In 1743, the Rev. Mr. Nairne, from 
the Secession Church, then recently organized, acceded to 
them ; and these two clergymen, with ruling elders, consti- 
tuted the "Reformed Presbytery." Several families had, 
in the meantime, emigrated to the American colonies. 

About the same time in which the " Reformed Presby- 
tery" was organized in Scotland, the Rev. Mr. Craighead 
collected the Covenanters of Pennsylvania, and induced 
them to bind them.«elves together by a solemn publi<*, en 

14* L 



162 



REFORMED PRESBYTERIANS. 



gagement to maintain their peculiar principles. Their body 
was slowly augmented, mostly by immigration, till they 
were joined by the Rev. Mr. Cuthbertson, from the Reformed 
Presbytery of Scotland, in 1752 ; and Rev. Messrs. Lin 
and Dobbin, from the Reformed Presbytery in Ireland, ia 
1774. This year the Reformed Presbytery was organized 
in the colony of Pennsylvania. 

Their growth was slow till 1782, when a union was effected 
between the Reformed Presbytery and the Associate Pres- 
byterian Church. Hence arose a new organization, deno- 
minated, from the name of its two constituent elements, the 
"Associate Reformed Church." 

This union, instead of combining two bodies in one, left 
a small minority in each of the elementary portions, which 
perpetuated the original organizations ; so that, in fact, 
two churches were divided into three, — an instructive in ■ 
stance of the influence of hasty and forced combinations 
of bodies of men. 

The doctrinal principles of the Reformed Church are 
thoroughly Calvinistic. The Reformed Presbyterians ob- 
jected to the Constitution of the United States, when it was 
formed, on account of its having no exclusive religious 
character, and its allowing Jews, Mohammedans, Deists 
and Atheists to hold office. They also objected to its 
recognition of slavery. They declared that they would 
not take the oath of allegiance. 

In 1830, a portion of their ministers began to entertain 
different views, and were in favor of acknowledging the 
government of this country, and avowing allegiance to it 
This led to what vras called the New Light Controversy, 
and the formation of two organizations, which still remaio 
separated. 

The entire body of the Reformed Presbyterians in the 
United States, including both these organizations, embraces 



REFORMED 



PRESBYTERIANS. 



163 



116 ministers, 15 licentiates, 25 students of theology, 120 
congregations, and 12,700 communicants. Among the well- 
known and distinguished ministers of this connection are 
the late John N. and Alexander McLeod, D. D., and Rev. 
Samuel B. Wylie. 

The two bodies are known as " The General Synod " 
(which acknowledges the Constitution of the U. S.) and 
" the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church'^ (which 
denounces the Constitution as sinful). The General Synod 
had one congregation in the South at the outbreak of 
the rebellion, at Fayetteville, Tennessee. Strenuous ef- 
forts were in vain made to induce the people to swear 
allegiance to the rebel government. Every one refused, 
and as a consequence most of the members had to flee to 
the free States. 

In 1867, the General Synod numbered 8 Presbyteries, 66 
ministers, 91 congregations and 8324 members. Given 
for all purposes, $123,097.34, or more than $15 per 
member. The theological seminary had an endowment 
of $23,000 and 16 students. The next year showed a far- 
ther increase. There were 77 pastors and 8487 members. 
This was the culmination of its prosperity. Wide and 
irreconcilable differences were arising in the body, which, 
though not created, were developed, by the movement for 
reunion going on among Presbyterians. 

Those broad sentiments of Christian sympathy and 
liberality which had been developed among evangelical 
Christians of the North by the war, and especially by the 
labors of the Christian Commission, had their embodi- 
ment in a leading member of this denomination, who had 
been the president of the Christian Commission. Mr. 
George H. Stuart earnestly desired to see his church take 
the honored place of a pioneer in the reunion of the 
various Presbyterian Churches. It was due to his zeal 



164 REFORMEB PRESBYTERIANS. 

and activity, that the Heformed Presbyterian Church, at 
tlie meeting of the general Synod, May, 1867, invited a 
National Convention of Presbyterians of all bi^anches to 
meet in Philadelphia, to consider the subject of a general 
union. This Convention met in November, and embraced 
delegates from six different organizations. The first Re- 
formed Presbyterian Church, Dr. Wylie pastor, was the 
place of meeting, and Mr. Stuart was elected chairman. 
Offence was given to the more rigid portion of the Re- 
formed body by the enthusiastic proceedings of this Con- 
vention. The adherents of an inspired psalmody were 
shocked at the singing of hymns. They were in no hurry 
to surrender their distinctive principles. So, when the 
General Synod met the next year, a very decided opposi- 
tion to the movement was shown by the majority of the 
members. Union only with those whose doctrines, order, 
and worship corresponded with their own, was now ad- 
vocated, and an amalgamation with the General Assembly 
in particular was strongly opposed. 

Mr. George II. Stuart and his friends being thus out- 
voted, and yet boldly maintaining the rightfulness of 
their liberal position, it was decided by a majority vote to 
censure and suspend Mr. Stuart for singing hymns and 
communing with persons not members of the Reformed 
Church. Thirteen delegates to the Synod issued a formal 
protest against this action. 

Mr. Stuart was sustained by his pastor. Dr. Wylie, by 
the First Church and by his P]'esbytery. Consequently, 
at the meeting of the next General Synod, the delegates 
from the Presbytery were refused admission. The Pres- 
bytery has since suspended relations with the Synod, and 
remains in that condition. 

The Allegheny Presbytery, also sympathizing with Mr. 
Stuart sent a protest against Synod's action, and was 



RPFOEMED FKIilSBYTERIAN3. 165 

pronounced out of communion, in reply. In 1870 it was 
received by the General Assembly of the reunited Pres- 
byterian Church. 

The missionary Presbytery of Saharanpur having, on 
similar grounds, suspended relations to the Synod, it was 
declared in secession. Steps were taken, however, to re- 
tain it in communion if possible, and to secure to the 
Synod control of its property. 

A basis of union was agreed upon in 1869 for an 
organic union with the United Presbyterians, but it has 
not yet (1871) been carried into effect. - 

The total number of ministers and licentiates reported 
in 1872 was 28; the attendance at the synod of 1872 
was 22. 

"The Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church," 
at its meeting in 1869, formally reiterate<l its position of 
hostility toward the Constitution of the United States, as 
an irreligious document, which could no't accepted and 
approved by a Christian people without sin, and declared 
it the duty of citizens to refuse to co-operate with a 
government thus founded. 

There is a college at Northwood, Ohio, and a theo- 
logical seminary connected with this Church; it has a 
mission among the freedmen at Washington. In 1872 it 
had 8 presbyteries, 88 congregations, 89 ministers, 8691 
communicants. The total of contributions reported ex- 
ceeded $150,000. 



166 



ASSOCIATE PRESBYTBRIAK S. 



THE ASSOCIATE PKESBYTERIAN CHURCH, 
OR SECEDERS. 

This, like the cliurch just described, is an offshoot from 
the Church of Scothand. The cause of the secession was 
almost identical in its nature with that of the great seces- 
sion of 1843, by means of which the Free Church was 
created. In 1649, the patronage of kirks had been for- 
mally abolished by parliament, as "an evil and bondage," 
as "a custom popish," and as "prejudicial to the liberties 
of the 'people." 

The act of parliament above refen-ed to remained in 
force until the year 1712, when the doctrine of patronage 
was again revived. Many protested against it loudly at 
the time. The right of patronage was, for a while, exer- 
cised with great moderation. A case arose, however, in 
which a minister was forced upon a congregation against 
the wishes of the great body of the people. The proceed- 
ing came before the General Assembly at its next session 
In May, 1732, and this, together with other similar cases, 
led to the adoption of an act '^Anent planting vacant 
churches,'' wherein the general doctrine of patronage was 
strongly asserted. In tho October following, the Rev. 
Ebenezer Erskine, a minister of distinguished ability and 
influence, in a sermon preached at the opening of the 
Synod of Perth and Sterling, denounced, with great free- 



ASSOCIATE PRESBYTERIANS. 167 

dom, the Act of Assembly above referred to. Mr. Erskino 
was censured by the synod, and hence arose the secession 
and the organization of the "Associate Presbytery of 
Scotland." This organization occurred November 17th, 
1783. Its growth, as might have been expected, was 
rapid, and in 1744 a synod was formed. The year fol- 
lowing, a controversy commenced, which resulted in the 
division of the synod into two parties, each claiming to be 
the "Associate Synod." The occasion of the disruption 
was the taking or not taking the burghers' oath. In order 
to be admitted burghers, or freemen of towns, an oath was 
required containing the following clause : "I protest before 
God and your lordship, that I profess and allow, with all 
my heart, the true religion, presently professed within 
this realm, and authorized by the laws thereof ; that I 
shall abide thereat, and defend the same to my life's end, 
renouncing the Roman religion called Papistry." The 
controversy turned on the question whether it was right 
to take an oath which implied an approval of the estab- 
lished church. The division was completed in 1746. 
Those who opposed the lawfulness of the oath were termed 
Anti-burghers, and its advocates Burghers. The act re- 
quiring the oath objected to, being repealed, the parties 
again coalesced, taking the title of The United Secession 
Church, with the exception of a small minority of the 
Anti-burghers, who only are represented in the United 
States by a regular organization. 

At an early day some of the secession emigrated to this 
country. The Rev. Messrs. Gellatly and Arnot were sent 
over by the Synod to organize congregations and to con- 
stitute them into a presbytery. They reached the province < 
of Pennsylvania in 1754, and organized the Associate 
Presbytery in the November of that year. 

In 1776, the number of ministers having increased to 



168 ASSOCIATE PUESBYTERIANS. 

thirteen, the presbytery was divided, and the eastern 
portion was denominated the " Presbytery of New York." 

In 1782, the division occurred by which the Associate 
Reformed Church came into existence, a more full history 
of which may be found in the preceding account of the 
Beformed Church. 

By this division, the Associate Church in this country 
Was almost extinguished. 

The Synod of Scotland, however, despatched assistance, 
and the church was gradually strengthened until the 
formation of the Synod in 1800. This was denominated 
"The Associate Synod of North America." It held its 
first meeting in Philadelphia, May, 1801. This body was 
subordinate to the Associate Synod in the mother country, 
till it was declared a co-ordinate Synod by the General 
Associate Synod of Scotland, in 1818. 

In 1841, a controversy arose in respect to principles 
involved in some cases of discipline, and the minority 
declared themselves the Synod. Since that time, until 
recently, there have been two bodies claiming the same 
name. Within a short time the two bodies have coalesced. 

From the larger of these bodies another secession took 
place in 1845, denominating itself "The Associate Pres- 
bytery of Philadelphia." 

The Associate Presbyterian Church in this country was, 
in all its branches, decidedly Calvinistic in doctrine. It 
insists upon the use of the literal translation of the Psalms 
in its singing. It maintained a high standard of duty in 
respect to the education of its children in the fear of God, 
making it an offence worthy of discipline if parents neglect- 
ed to teach their children the Shorter Catechism. It pos- 
sessed a learned and pious ministry. It had a Theological 
Seminary at Xenia, Ohio, with two professorships, one of 



ASSOCIATE REFORMED CHURCH. 169 

didactic theology and Hebrew, and one of pastoral theology 
and biblical literature. Students 45. 



THE ASSOCIATE REFORMED CHURCH. 

This branch of the Presbyterian family of churches waa 
called into existence, and took its name from a union that 
was formed between large portions of the Associate and 
the Reformed Presbyterian churches at Pequa, Pennsylva- 
nia, in June, 1782. Modifying the doctrine of the West- 
minster Confession of Faith concerning the power of the 
civil magistrate in matters of religion, and adapting the 
form of church government and the directory of worship 
to the Word of God, and the circumstances of the church 
in this country, the synod formally issued its constitution 
and standards at Greencastle, Pa,, May 31, 1799. 

Soon afterwards, there being, from various quarters, an 
urgent demand for sound and faithful ministers, the erec- 
tion of a theological seminary was taken into serious con- 
sideration ; and, in 1801, the Rev. John M. Mason was sent 
to Great Britain and Ireland with authority to procure a 
suitable number of evangelical ministers and probationers, 
and to solicit donations, in money and books, for establish- 
ing an institution to train young men for the gospel min- 
istry. He met with considerable success ; and, immediately 
on his return, the synod (which, in the autumn of 1802, 
had divided itself, for the convenience of its members, into 
four synods, and formed these into a general synod, to 
meet by delegation, and to hold its first meeting at Green- 
castle, May, 1804) took steps for establishing its theological 

15 



170 ASSOCIATE REFORMED CHURCH. 

school, Their arrangements were completed in May, 
1805. The Rev. J. M. Mason, D. D., was appointed pro- 
fessor ; and on the 1st of November following, the institu- 
tution went into successful operation. It was the first 
theological seminary in the United States, 

Thus established, the synod pursued its course, and was 
largely prospered until about the year 1816, when, from a 
gradual relinquishment of some of its distinctive features, 
and the withdrawal, on that account, of the synods of Scioto 
into the West, and of the Carolinas, in the South, its interests 
materially declined. 

In May, 1822, a partial union was formed with the Gen- 
eral Assembly of the Presbyterian Church, and the General 
Synod was dissolved. The subordinate synods, however, 
continued their existence, and were active and useful in 
their work. Again the demand for ministers trained in 
the church, and sympathizing with it, in everything in which 
it was peculiar, was strong and urgent. Shortly afterwards, 
therefore, the synod of the West established a seminary at 
Alleghany, Pa. The Rev. Joseph Kerr was its first pro- 
fessor ; and under his care, and that of his successors. Rev. 
Mungo Dick and Rev. John T. Pressly, D. D., it has been 
instrumental in furnishing the churches with a large num- 
ber of able ministers of the New Testament. In 1829 the 
Synod of New York revived the seminary at Newburgh, 
and placed it under the care of the Rev. Joseph MacCarroll, 
D. D. Already it has sent many laborers into the field ; 
and with an excellent building, a most valuable library, a 
good location, and an able professor, it presents most im- 
portant facilities for a theological education. A younge**, 
but flourishing and valuable theological institution was also 
formed in 1839 by the second synod of the West, at Oxford, 
Ohio, under the presidency of the Rev. Joseph Claybaugh, 
D. D. At Due-west-corner, Abbeville district, S. C, an 



/ 



ASSOCIATE REFORMED CIICROH, 



171 



institution "with literary and theological departments has 
also been opened, under the most auspicious circumstances. 
It is under the charge of four professors appointed hj the 
synod of the South, and already numbers over one hundred 
Students. 

In each of these synods there is a periodical devoted to 
the interests of the Associate Eeformed Church, namely, 
in the order of their history : The Evangelical Guardian, 
edited by the Rev. D. Macdill, D. D., at Hamilton, Ohio ; 
The Christian Magazine of the South, by Rev. J. Boyce, 
in Fairfield district, S. C. ; The Preacher, by Rev. J). R. 
Kerr, at Pittsburg, Pa. ; and The Christian Instructor, by 
Rev. J. B. Dales, at Philadelphia. Besides projecting and 
sustaining these institutions and publications, the Associate 
Reformed Church has commenced a most interesting mis- 
sion to Palestine ; taken incipient steps for one in Western 
Africa ; appointed two ministers to explore Texas during 
the coming season, and resolves upon a special efibrt to 
Beek the lost sheep of the house of Israel in our large cities, 
and point them to the true Messiah, as soon as the proper 
men can be employed. 

The Associate Reformed Church is the most liberal and 
efficient of all the branches of the early Scotch Secession 
churches. It has numbered among its ministry some of the 
most brilliant lights of learning and religion in this country. 
It is thoroughly Calvinistic in doctrine, maintains the literal 
psalmody, and is very strict in its discipline. 

The Rev. John Mason, and his son, John M. Mason, D. D.; 
Rev. James Proudfit, and Alexander Proudfit, D. D., the 
late eminent and beloved advocate of African colonization, 
were men to adorn any church, and any age. 



172 



UNITED PKESBYTERIANS. 



UNITED PEESBYTERIANS. 

In 1S58, the "Associate Reformed" and the "Associ- 
ate Presbyterian Churches (the two last-named bodies) 
were united into one organization, called the United 
Presbyterian Church in North America, and forming a 
body more than fifty thousand strong. They hold to 
the obligation of using only an inspired psalmody in 
worship, and they are exclusive in their terms of com- 
munion. Otherwise they cannot be distinguished from 
the great body of Presbyterians in America in polity or 
in doctrine. Their membership is almost exclusively 
Scotch or Scotch-Irish, or the immediate descendants of 
such. Their position on national questions is strongly 
anti-slavery, and though owning allegiance to the Con- 
stitution, they have always shown great desire to secure 
an amendment distinctly recognizing at least the being of 
God in that instrument. Strong loyal and anti-slavery 
resolutions were adopted during the war. 

In 1868, by a unanimous vote, the General Assembly 
declared that the terms of union between all the Presby- 
terian branches in America, proposed by the Philadelphia 
convention of 1867, as a whole, would not answer the 
purpose. There must be no relinquishment of principle 
for union, and especially was unqualified assent to the 
Confession and Catechisms indispensable. 

In 1873, at the session of the General Assembly, the 
Presbyterians were directed hereafter, in the organization 
of new churches, to require that the charters of such 
churches should contain a certain formula as a definition 
of tlieir ecclesiastical relations to the United Presbyterian 



UNITED PRESBYTERIANS. 



173 



Church of North America^ and that existing charters must 
be changed to conform to this formula. 

Statistics of 1873 ; 8 synods, 56 presbyteries, 591 or- 
dained ministers, 53 licentiates, 772 congregations, 73,452 
communicants, 651 Sunday-schools, 5972 teachers, 59,288 
Sunday-school scholars. Contributions for Church and be- 
nevolent purposes, $872,918, or $11.48 per member. Their 
Foreign Mission work employs 40 American missionaries 
and teachers, 97 native ordained ministers and teachers, 
has 18 churches in heathen lands, 563 communicants, 21 
schools, 2322 scholars, and expended, in 1873, $55,164. 

The United Presbyterian Church has five theological 
seminaries — Newburgh, N. Y. ; Allegheny, Pa. ; Xenia, 
Ohio, and North-west, Monmouth, 111., and the mission- 
ary seminary at Osioot and Pamleh, Egypt ; 15 professors 
and 106 students ; 2 colleges, with 572 students. The 
total value of church property is estimated at $4,096,000, 
and the average salaries of pastors, $898. 



The Associate Reformed Synod of the South had, in 
1873, 10 presbyteries, 71 ministers and 65 churches. Nego- 
tiations for Union with the Southern Presbyterian Church 
were carried on about the close of the war, but without 
result. ' One of the presbyteries, however, was received by 
the Synod of Alabama in 1866. 

The Associate E-eformed Synod of New York had, iu 
1867,16 ministers and 1631 communicants. 

The Associate Synod of North America also had 22 
ministers and 778 communicants. 

The last two bodies are fragments of the Associate and 
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Churches, which refused 
to go with the mass of their fellow-members into the union 
by which the United Presbyterian Church was formed. 

15* 



174 



CUMBirilLAUD PRESBYTERIANS. 



CUMBERLAND PEESBYTERIANS. 

About tlie beginning of the present century there arose 
a remarkable revival of religion among a portion of the 
Presbyterian church in Kentucky. Meetings were held 
in the open air ; and multitudes flocked together from the 
distance of fifty, and even in some instances, a hundred 
miles. This was the origin of camp-meetings. As the 
number of converts was great, and religion was extended 
into destitute and neglected regions, a strong necessity was 
felt for a more rapid multiplication of Christian ministers. 
This led the Cumberland Presbytery, in 1801, to encourage 
four laymen, without a classical education, to prepare 
written discourses with view to the receiving of license 
to preach the gospel. In 1803 Mr. Alexander Anderson, 
and Mr. Finis Ewing, were ordained to the work of the 
ministry. Others were licensed as probationers, and several 
candidates were received under the care of the presbytery. 

In 1805, the Synod of Kentucky, in reviewing the book 
of records of the Cumberland Presbytery, took notice of 
their having introduced men into the sacred office who had 
not acquired a regular education, and who were understood 
to have taken exceptions to the doctrinal standards of the 
Church. This led to the appointment of a commission, 
with full powers to act in the place of the synod, both ir 
holding a friendly conference with the presbytery, and in 
judicially terminating the case. 

The commission demanded that all those persons who 
had been ordained or licensed without an examination on 
all the branches of learning and doctrine required in the 
Confession of Faith, should appear before themselves, and 



CUMBERLAI^D 



PRESBYTERIANS. 



175 



submit to a full and regular examination. To this demand 
'he presbytery declined to submit. 

The commission then passed a resolution that those who 
had been thus licensed or ordained without a full examina- 
tion, should be prohibited from the exercise of official 
functions, until such times as they should submit them- 
selves to their jurisdiction. 

The members of presbytery continued to exercise their 
ministry, but not without making various efforts, during a 
period of five years, to obtain through the General As- 
sembly a "redress of grievances." Having failed in all 
these endeavors, the Rev. Messrs. Ewing, King, and 
McAdow, in 1810, declared themselves independent, and 
constituted the Cumberland Presbytery, which w^as the 
germ of the present Cumberland Presbyterian Church. 
In constituting the church, the following statement is 
made as defining their position : 

" We, Samuel McAdow^, Finis Ewing, and Samuel King, 
regularly ordained ministers of the Presbyterian Church, 
against whom no charge either of immorality or heresy 
has ever been exhibited before any judicature of the 
church, having waited in vain more than four years, in the 
mean time petitioning the General Assembly for a redress 
of grievances, and a restoration of our violated rights, 
have and do hereby agree and determine to constitute our- 
selves into a presbytery, known by the name of the Cum- 
berland Presbytery, on the following conditions : 

"All candidates for the ministry, who may hereafter be 
licensed by this presbytery, and all the licentiates or pro- 
bationers who may hereafter be ordained by this presby- 
tery, shall be required, before such licensure and ordina- 
tion, to receive and accept the Confession of Faith and 
Discipline of the Presbyterian Church, except the idea of 
fatality that seems to be taught under the mysterious doc- 



176 CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIANS. 



trine of predestination. It is to be understood, however, 
that such as can clearly receive the Confession of Faith 
without an exception, will not be required to make any. 
Moreover, all licentiates, before they are set apart to the 
whole work of the ministry, -or ordained, shall be required 
to undergo an examination in English Grammar, Geogra-^ 
phy. Astronomy, Natural and Moral Philosophy, and 
Church History. It will not be understood that examina- 
tions in Experimental Religion and Theology will be 
omitted. The presbytery may also require an examination 
on any part, or all, of the above branches of knowledge 
before licensure, if they deem it expedient." 

So rapid was their growth, that three years after, in 
1813, they became three presbyteries, and constituted a 
synod. At the sessions of the synod in 1828, three new 
synods were erected, and measures were taken for the or- 
ganization of a general assembly. The first meeting of 
the General Assembly occurred at Princeton, Ky., ia 
1829. 

The doctrines of this church are a modification of the 
Westminster Confession. The chief point of difi'erence i3 
their rejecting the doctrine of election, as in their view 
tending to fatality. They are strictly Presbyterian in 
government and order. 

Few churches, perhaps, have increased more rapidly than 
has this young and vigorous denomination. Its doctrines 
seem to have been popular not only with the masses, but 
with those of high culture and refinement. Although a 
classical course of instruction is not made a sine qua non 
to entering the sacred profession, yet no ecclesiasticaJ 
organization, it is believed, more strongly favors a highly 
educated ministry. As confirmaiion of this, the church, 
though in its infancy, not only stands abreast with the 
older and more powerful denominations in the institutions 



CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIANS. 177 

.)f learning established for the education of both sexes, 
but it now embraces in its ministry many of the fine 
scholars and vigorous thinkers of the age. Nor is this 
denomination behind others in its periodical literature, as 
its highly respectable weeklies, monthlies, and quarter- 
lies will testify. 

A prominent trait in this body of Christians is its con- 
servatimn. The great civil war between the North and the 
South — a conflict which deluged the United States with 
blood, and which rent in twain the leadisig denominations 
not before severed — was not sufficient, it seems, to divide 
the Cumberland Presbyterian Church ! This denomina- 
tion has never prostituted to political ends either the 
pulpit or the religious press. With it the church has 
ever been considered an asylum for the heart, and not an 
arena for fierce, bitter controversies in reference to the 
kingdom of Caesar. 

The statistics of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church 
are very defective. More than one-fourth of its presby- 
teries fail to report to the Annual General Assembly. The 
most complete of its recent reports is that of 1872, in 
which only 74 out of 103 presbyteries reported. Esti- 
mating the non-reporting bodies by their previous reports, 
the whole result would be 24 synods, 103 presbyteries, 
1085 ministers, 1948 congregations, 89,092 communicants; 
children in Sabbath-schools, 48,657 ; contributions for 
church and benevolent purposes, $561,300; adherent popu- 
lation, about 450,000. They have mission stations among 
the Indians in the Indian Territory. They have five col- 
leges, beside one college for women, and one theological 
seminary at Lebanon, Tenn. 

M 



178 



MORAVIANS. 



MOSAYIAXS. 

The TJnitas Frcdr^um, or Church of the Bohemian and 
Moravian Brethren, was founded by followers of John 
Huss in the year 1457, sixty years before the Reformation. 
It rapidly grew and spread. In 1621, Ferdinand of Tyrol 
issued an edict for the suppression of the Church. The 
Bibles were burned and tlie Brethren exiled, and for a while 
the Unitas Fratrum seemed to be extinct. But a " hidden 
seed" remained. Among the mountains of Bohemia 
there dwelt a few devoted men who kept alive the faith 
of the fathers, and in Poland there survived a couple of 
the bishops of the Church. In 1722 some of the Mora- 
vians from Bohemia found an asylum upon the estates 
of Nicholas Lewis, Count de Zinzendorf. Here they 
founded a town and called it Herrnhut. Through the 
Polish bishops the episcopal succession of the ancient 
Brethren was transmitted to the church at Herrnhut and 
the ancient discipline revived. Moved by a great spirit- 
ual awakening, the exiles, whose numbers were swelled 
by devout men from all parts of Europe, approached the 
work of Foreign Missions. In 1732 the first mission- 
aries went to the West Indies and the year following to 
Greenland. As the pioneers in the work of Protestant 
missions the Brethren are chiefly known in later times. 
The Church has missions in Greenland, Labrador, the 
West Indies, Central America, Surinam, Africa, Australia, 
Thibet, Palestine and among the North American Indians. 

The Church is divided into four provinces (two Ameri- 
can, and a British and a Continental). The government 
of the province is administered by Synods, which meet 
triennially, and the affairs of the Church at large are 
administered by a General Synod, which convenes in 



MORAVIANS. 



179 



Europe every ten years. The will of the Synods is exe- 
cuted by the Boards elected for that purpose. 

The orders in the ministry are bishops (of the so-called 
Apostolical Succession), presbyters and deacons. 

The doctrinal position of the Church is strictly evan- 
gelical. The ritual of the Church is simple. Litanies 
are used in connection with the various services, though 
their use is not binding upon the officiating clergyman. 
Music holds a prominent place in connection with wor- 
ship. The festivals, as Epiphany, Christmas and Easter, 
are observed. " Lovefeasts,^^ consisting of a meal of light 
cakes with tea and coffee, are partaken of in imitation of 
the apostolical " Agapse.'^ The Moravians do not hold 
to a community of goods. 

In the year 1736 the first colony of Moravians cam_e 
to Georgia in company with John Wesley. The first 
permanent settlement was made in 1742 at Bethlehem, 
Pennsylvania. A large colony proceeded to Salem, N. C. 
The membership in the United States was, in 1872, 14,263. 
There are 63 congregations and about 100 clergymen in 
service, including 5 bishops. There are 4 periodicals. The 
home membership throughout the world was, in 1872, 
27,731 ; the membership in the mission-field was 69,404. 
The Church has large schools at Bethlehem and Litiz, Pa. ; 
Salem, N. C. ; Hope, Ind. ; Nazareth, Pa., and other places. 
The seminary at Bethlehem has educated over 6000 young 
ladies. There is also a theological seminary at Bethlehem. 
They had, in 1872, 101 missionary stations, 305 sub- 
stations, 311 missionaries, 1427 native helpers, 1171 day 
and Sunday-school teachers ; 69,139 persons were mem- 
bers of their missionary congregations, 35,810 of whom 
were baptized adults. Their missionary expenditure for 
the year was $246,456. 



180 



FREEWILL BAPTISTS. 



FREEWILL BAPTISTS. 

Benjamin Randall and a few others, ordained as Baptist 
ministers in New Hampshire and Maine in the latter part of 
the last century, soon found that they were not in doctrinal 
harmony with their Calvinistic brethren, and in 1780 sepa- 
rated from them and formed new churches to avoid strife and 
be able to work with greater liberty. Because they taught 
that the human will is free, they were called Freeivill Baptists, 
and this name they accepted and used after the formal separa- 
tion from their brethren had taken place. They have largely 
increased since that time. 

In common with other evangelical churches, they believe in 
the unity and infinity of God, the divinity of Christ, the per- 
sonality and efiaciency of the Holy Spirit, the inspiration and 
authority of the Scriptures, the depravity of human nature, the 
guilt and peril of sin, the need of an atonement in order to 
salvation, the resurrection of the dead and the immortality of 
the soul. Besides these doctrines, they hold that the depravity 
of human nature, resulting from the fall of man, is not such 
as to destroy moral freedom, make obedience to God impos- 
sible, or excuse an unfaithful life. The call to repentance and 
a holy life they believe to be founded in a just claim of God 
upon the free and capable soul of man, so that he cannot plead 
inability to justify his refusal. They believe that the atonement 
made by Christ is general ; that its benefits are ofiered to all 
men ; that no one is prevented from accepting them by the 
absence of the special grace of God, which constrains some 
and passes by others ; that regeneration is a work wrought in 
the submissive soul by the Holy Spirit, and that those, and 
only those, who freely repent, believe and turn to God will be 
regenerated ; that the soul neither loses its freedom nor gets 
beyond peril in being regenerated ; that the same free obedi- 
ence which was the condition of gaining God's favor is needful 
to keep it, and that only they who endure always are sure of 
eternal life; they hold Christian baptism to be the immersion 
of true believers, in the name of the Father, Son and Holy 
Spirit, and that only such are proper members of a Christian 
church. They believe that the Lord's Supper is a Christian 
ordinance, meant to show forth Christ's death and to express 
the union and fellowship of his disciples and friends, and they 
welcome these to the table. They hold firmly to the inde- 
pendence of the churches, denying the right of other ecclesi- 
astical bodies to annul or reverse their action, but they also 



DISCIPLES 



OP CHRIST. 



181 



recognize the need of association for the sake of unity, strength 
and usefulness. A number of churches, conveniently loca^ted, 
unite as an association, and the meeting of their delegates four 
times a year is called a Quarterly Meeting. Several of these 
Quarterly Meetings, uniting and meeting annually, form a 
Yearly Meeting. All the Yearly Meetings are represented in 
the General Conference, meeting triennially. Though each 
church is independent, yet, when it wants information or 
counsel, or when it is in trial, it, or a grieved minority of it, 
may go to the Quarterly Meeting for aid. The Quarterly 
Meeting may apply in turn to the Yearly Meeting, and the 
Yearly Meeting to the General Conference. 

They had, in 1873, 35 Yearly Meetings, 1504 churches, 
1155 ministers, 70,576 members. They have four newspapers 
and periodicals ; two colleges — Hillsdale, Mich., and Bates, 
Lewiston, Me., and many academies. They have also foreign 
and home missionary societies. 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 

The Church established by Christ and his Apostles 
was a unit, and was designed to remain so through all 
fcimd It had the one sure "foundation," and the one 
Divine rule for building thereon. The gospel was 
preached to the people ; they heard it, believed it, and 
obeyed it. These obedient ones were instructed to 
"keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace," to 
" continue steadfastly in the Apostles' doctrine and fel- 
lowship, and in breaking of bread and of prayers." 

Now, it is evident that there have iQ^een many innova- 
tions upon and departures from the teaching and practice 
of the primitive Church as laid down in the New Testa- 
ment Scriptures. Divisions, strifes, and specidatious 
exist; and while these exist, the woilu cannot be con- 

16 



182 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 



verted to Christianity. The aim of the Disciples of 
Christ is to restore the faith and practice of the Apos- 
tolic Church, to unite all of God's people on the " one 
foundation," and to have the gospel preached among all 
nations. 

As individuals, this people wear the naroe of "Disci- 
ples of Christ,'' or "Christians." In their organized 
capacity they are known as "The Church of Christ," 
"Church of God," or simply "The Christian Church," 
believing that these names are authorized by the Word 
of God, and were, by the Holy Spirit, applied to the 
Church in the days of the Apostles. 

Scarcely fifty years have transpired since the reformatory 
movement began, yet it has attained large proportions 
already, and is rapidly extending its influence. Churches 
of this faith are found in all parts of the United States, 
in the Dominion of Canada, in England, Ireland, Scot- 
land, Australia, and Jamaica. They number fully 
600,000 communicants. They have 3000 preachers in 
the field, many of whom are distinguished for their talent 
and scholarship. They publish 30 periodicals : 9 of 
these are weeklies, 1 quarterly, and the rest monthlies. 
1 is published in Canada, 2 in England, 1 in Australia, 
and the rest in the United States. 

The Disciples are distinguished for their interest in 
education. Their oldest literary institution is Bethany 
College, founded by Alexander Campbell, who for manj 
years presided over it. Kentucky University, at Lex- 
ington, Kentucky, has 800 students in attendance. The 
university at Indianapolis, Indiana, is in a flourishing 
condition. Besides these, they have 12 or 15 colleges and 
a large number of academies and seminaries under theii 
control. They have taken steps to found a college in Aus- 
tralia to meet the wants of the Church in that locality. 



DISCIPLES OF CIITvIST. 



183 



They are a missionary people. They have a general 
missionary society, directed by a Board of Managers/' 
through which the offerings of the brotherhood are applied 
for the extension and upbuilding of the Church. They 
have also State and local organizations of a missionary 
character, which co-operate with the General Society. 

The following statement, taken from the writings of 
Mr. Campbell and others, is a very explicit declaration 
of the object and principles of the Disciples of Christ: 

" The constitutional principle of this Christian associa- 
tion and its object are clearly expressed in the following 
resolution : — ' That this society, formed for the sole pur- 
pose of promoting simple evangelical Christianity, shall, 
to the utmost of its power, countenance and support such 
ministers, and such only, as exhibit a manifest conformity 
to the original standard, in conversation and doctrine, in 
Real and diligence; only such as reduce to practice the 
simple original form of Christianity, expressly exhibited 
upon the sacred page, without attempting to inculcate any- 
thing of human authority, of private opinion, or inventions 
of men, as having any place in the constitution, faith, or 
worship of the Christian church.' 

" But to contradistinguish this effort from some others 
almost contemporaneous with it, we would emphatically 
remark, that, whilst the remonstrants warred against 
human creeds, evidently because those creeds warred 
against their own private opinions and favorite dogmas, 
which they wished to substitute for those creeds, — this 
enterprise, so far as it was hostile to those creeds, warred 
against them, not because of their hostility to any private 
or favorite opinions which were desired to be substituted 
for them ; but because those human institutions supplanted 
the Bible, made the Word of God of non-effect, were fatal 



184 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST, 



to the intelligence, union, purity, holiness, and happiness 
of the disciples of Christ, and hostile to the salvation of 
the world. We had not at first, and we have not now, a 
favorite opinion or speculation, which we would offer as a 
substitute for any human creed or constitution in Chris- 
tendom. 

" With various success, and with many of the opinions 
of the various sects imperceptibly carried with them from 
the denominations to which they once belonged, did the 
advocates of the Bible cause plead for the union of Chris- 
tians of every name on the broad basis of the apostles' 
teaching. But it was not until the year 1823, that a 
restoration of the original gospel and order of things began 
to be advocated in a periodical, edited by Alexander 
Campbell, of Bethany, Virginia, entitled ' The Christian 
Baptist.' 

" He and his father, Thomas Campbell, renounced the 
Presbyterian system, and were immersed in the year 1812, 
They and the congregation which they had formed, united 
with the Bedstone Baptist Association ; protesting against 
all human creeds as bonds of union, and professing subjec- 
tion to the Bible alone. But in pressing upon the atten- 
tion of that society and the public the all-sufficiency of the 
Sacred Scriptures for everything necessary to the perfec- 
tion of the Christian character, whether in the private or 
social relations of life, in the church or in the world, they 
began to be opposed by a strong creed-party in that asso- 
ciation. After some ten years' debating and contending 
for the Bible alone, and the apostles' doctrine, Alexander 
Campbell, and the church to which he belonged, united 
with the Mahoning Association of Ohio — that association 
being more favorable to his views of reform. 

" In his debates on the subject and action of baptism 
with Mr. Walker, a seceding minister, in the year 1820, 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 



185 



and with Mr. M'Calla, a Presbyterian minister, in 1828, 
his views of reformation began to be developed, and were 
very generally received by the Baptist society, as far aa 
these works were read. 

"But in his 'Christian Baptist,' which began July 4, 
1823, his views of the need of reformation were more 
fully exposed ; and as these gained ground by the pleading 
of various ministers of the Baptist denomination, a party 
in opposition began to exert itself, and to oppose the 
spread of what they were pleased to call heterodoxy. 
But not till after great numbers began to act upon these 
principles, was there any attempt towards separation. 
After the Mahoning Association appointed Walter Scott, 
an evangelist, in 1827, and when great numbers began to 
be immersed into Christ uiider his labors, and new churches 
began to be erected by him and other laborers in the field, 
did the Baptist associations begin to declare non-fellowship 
with the brethren of the Reformation. Thus by constraint, 
not of choice, they were obliged to form societies out of 
those communities that split upon the ground of adherence 
to the Apostles' doctrine. The distinguishing character- 
istics of their views and practices are the following : — 

" They regard all the sects and parties of the Christian 
world as having, in greater or less degree, departed from 
the simplicity of faith and manners of the first Christians. 
This defection they attribute to the great varieties of spe- 
culation and metaphysical dogmatism of the countless 
creeds, formularies, liturgies, and books of discipline 
adopted and inculcated as bonds of union and platforms 
of communion in all the parties which have sprung from 
the Lutheran Keformation. The eifects of these synodical 
covenants, conventional articles of belief, and rules of 
ecclesiastical polity, has been the introduction of a new 
nomenclature, a human vocabulary of religious words^ 

16* 



186 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 



phrases, and teclinicalities, which has displaced the style 
of the living oracles, and affixed to the sacred diction 
ideas wnollj unknown to the apostles of Christ. 

" To remedy and obviate these aberrations, they propose 
to ascertain from the Holy Scriptures, according to the 
commonly received and vfell established rules of interpre- 
tation, the ideas attached to the leading terms and sen- 
tences found in the Holy Scriptures, and then to use the 
words of the Holy Spirit in the apostolic acceptation of 
them. 

"By thus expressing the ideas com.municated by the 
Holy Spirit, in the terms and phrases learned from the 
apostles, and by avoiding the artificial and technical lan- 
guage of scholastic theology, they propose to restore a 
pure speech to the household of faith ; and by accustoming 
the family of God to use the language and dialect of their 
heavenly Father, they expect to promote the sanctification 
of one another through the truth, and to terminate those 
discords and debates which have always originated from 
the words which man's wisdom teaches, and from a reve- 
rential regard and esteem for the style of the great mas- 
ters of polemic divinity; believing that speaking the same 
things in the same style is the only certain way to thinking 
the same things. 

" They make a very marked distinction between faith 
and opinion ; between the testimony of God and the rea- 
sonings of men : the words of the Spirit and human infer- 
ences. Faith in the • testimony of God and obedience to 
the commandments of Jesus are their bond of union; and 
not an agreement in any abstract views or opinions upon 
what is written or spoken by divine authority. Regarding 
all the opposing theories of religious sectaries as extremes 
begotten by each other, they cautiously avoid them, as 
equidistant from the simplicity and practical tendency of 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 



187 



tTitj promises and precepts, of the doctrine and facts, of 
the exhortations and precedents of the Christian institu- 
tion. They look for unity of spirit and the bonds of 
peace in the practica-l acknowledgement of ^ one faithj one 
Lord, one immersion, one hope, one body, one Spirit, one 
God and Father of all;' not in unity of opinions, nor in 
anity of forms, ceremonies, or modes of worship. 

" The Holy Scriptures of both Testaments they regard 
as containing revelations from (xod, and as all necessary 
to make the man of God perfect, and accomplished for 
every good word and work : the New Testament, or the 
living oracles of Jesus Christ, they understand as contain- 
ing the Christian religion ; testimonies of the four evan- 
gelists they view as illustrating and proving the great pro- 
position on which our religion rests, namely, — that J esuB 
of Nazareth is the Messiah, the only begotten and well- 
beloved Son of God, and the only Saviour of the world ; 
the Acts of the Apostles as a divinely authorized narra- 
tive of the beginning and progress of the reign or king- 
dom of Jesus Christ, recording the full development of 
' the gospel' by the Holy Spirit sent down from beaven, 
and the procedure of the apostles in setting up the Church 
of Christ on earth ; the Epistles as carrying out and ap- 
plying the doctrine of the apostles to the practice of in- 
dividuals and churches, and as developing the tendencies 
of the gospel in the behavior of its professors, and all as 
forming a complete standard of faith and morals, adapted 
to the interval between the ascension of Christ, and his 
return with the kingdom which he has received from God. 

" Every one who sincerely believes the testimony which 
God gave of Jesus of Nazareth, saying, ' This is my Son, 
the beloved, in whom I delight,' or, in other words, believes 
what the evangelists and apostles have testified concerning 
him, from his conception to his coronation in heaven, as 



188 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 



Lord of all, and wlio is willing to obey him in everything, 
they regard as a proper subject of immersion into the 
name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy 
Spirit, and no one else. They consider Christian baptism, 
after a public, sincere, and intelligent confession of the 
faith in Jesus, as necessary to admission to the privileges 
of the kingdom of the Messiah, and as a solemn pledge on 
the part of heaven, of the actual remission of all past 
sins, and of adoption into the family of God. 

" The Holy Spirit is promised only to those who believe 
and obey the Saviour. No one is taught to expect the 
reception of that heavenly monitor and Comforter as a 
resident in his heart, till he obeys the gospel. Thus, while 
they proclaim faith and repentance, or faith and a change 
of heart, as preparatory to immersion, remission of sins, 
and the gift of the Holy Spirit, they say to all penitents, 
or all those who believe and repent of their sins, as Peter 
said to the first audience addressed after the Holy Spirit 
was bestowed after the glorification of Jesus, *Be immersed, 
every one of you, in the name of the Lord Jesus, for the 
remission of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy 
Spirit.' They teach sinners that God commands all men 
everywhere to repent or to turn to God; that the Holy 
Spirit strives with them so to do by the apostles and pro- 
phets ; that God beseeches them to be reconciled through 
Jesus Christ, and that it is the duty of all men to belieTe 
the gospel and turn to God. 

*'The immersed believers are congregated into societies 
according to their nearness to each other, and taught to 
meet every first day of the week in honor and commemora- 
tion of the resurrection of Jesus, and to attend to the Lord's 
Sapper, which commemorates the death of the Son of God, 
to read and hear the living oracles, to teach and admonish 
one another, to unite in all prayer and praise, to contribute 



DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 



189 



to the necessities of saints, and to perfect holiness in the 
fear of the Lord. 

Every congregation chooses its own overseers and 
deacons, who preside over and administer the alFairs of the 
congregations ; and every church, either from itself, or in 
co-operation with others, sends out, as opportunity offers, 
one or more evangelists, or proclaimers of the word, to 
preach the word and to immerse those who believe, to gather 
congregations, and to extend the knowledge of salvation as 
far as their means extend. But every church regards these 
evangelists as its servants, and therefore they have no 
control over any congregation, each church being subject 
to its own choice of presidents or elders, whom they have 
appointed. Perseverance in all the work of faith, labor 
of love, and patience of hope, is inculcated by all the 
Disciples, as essential to admission into the heavenly 
kingdom. 

" Such are the prominent outlines of the faith and prao • 
tice of those who wish to be known as the disciples of Christ ; 
but no society among them would agree to make the pre- 
ceding items either a confession of faith or a standard of 
practice ; but, for the information of those who wish an 
acquaintance with them, are willing to give at any time a 
reason for their faith, hope, and practice. 

" On the design of baptism, and the benefits resulting 
from this ordinance to the penitent believer through the 
Dlood of Christ, the Disciples have been greatly minunder- 
stood. That the blood of Jesus is the only procuring cause 
of the remission of sins, is believed by every Disciple. 
Baptism, they teach, is designed to introduce the subjects 
of it into the participation of the blessings of the death and 
resurrection of Christ, who died for our sins, and rose 
again for our justification. But it has no abstract eiOficacy. 
Without previous faith in the blood of Christ, and deep and 
unfeigned repentance before God, neither immersion in 



190 DISCIPLES OF CHRIST. 

water nor any other action can secure to us tlie blessings 
of peace and pardon. It can merit nothing. Still to the 
believing penitent it is the means of receiving a formal, 
distinct, and specific absolution, or release from guilt. 
Therefore none but those who have first believed in Christ 
and repented of their sins, and that have been intelligently 
immersed into his death, have the full and explicit testi- 
mony of God, assuring them of pardon. In reference to 
generation the Disciples teach that an individual who is 
jpst begotten of God, whose heart is imbued with the word 
of God, is enabled to enjoy the life thus bestowed when 
immersed into Christ, as it gives him an introduction to 
the happiness and society of the pardoned and the spiritual. 
Baptism, succeeding faith and repentance, consummates 
regeneration. The new birth as a change of state, is a 
formal ingress of a penitent believer, a prior spiritual crea- 
tion, into the family and kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ. 
Formed for a new state by faith and repentance, he enjoys 
its heavenly adaptations the moment he enters the king- 
dom by being baptized in the name of Christ. The waters 
of baptism in connection with the death of Jesus, afibrd 
him as great an assurance of safety, as did their type, the 
waters of the Red Sea, to the redeemed Israelites, when 
they engulphed Pharaoh and his hosts. Thus are we taught 
that penitent believers are born the children of <S-od by 
baptism — that salvation is connected with baptism when 
accompanied by faith — that remission of sins is to be en- 
joyed by baptism through the blood of Christ — that per- 
sons, having previously believed and repented, wash away 
their sins in baptism, calling on the name of the Lord — 
that they profess to be dead to sin and alive to God in the 
action of baptism — that believers put on Christ when bap 
tized into Christ — that the church is cleansed by baptism 
and belief of the Word of God — that men are saved by 



BAPTISTS 



— MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 



191 



baptism in connection with the renewing of the Holy 
Spirit — and that the answer of a good conscience is ob- 
tained in baptism through the resnrrection of Christ. 

"As the Disciples endeavor to call Bible things by Bible 
names, they have sometimes been denominated, but most 
unjustly so, Unitarians. They believe that Christ is abso- 
lutely divine, infinitely above any super-human or even 
sujDer-angelic being. They believe Christ to be ^God^ in 
nature, and not in office only, or because he is invested with 
divine prerogatives, as Moses is said to have been made ^ a 
god unto Pharaoh.' 

The statistics of the Disciples are very imperfect, deal- 
ing in round numbers, which are, to a considerable extent, 
mere guesses. A statement which approximates - more 
nearly than most to the truth gives them, in 1873, 2366 
churches, 2000 ministers, 350,000 members, 2453 Sunday- 
schools, 27,173 teachers, 284,470 scholars. They had 
raised for evangelical work, analogous to home missions, 
$95,182. They have 10 collegiate institutions for young 
men, 4 for young women, and 12 academies or seminaries. 



BAPTISTS— MINOK DENOMINATIONS. 

Under this head it is proposed to place in a group sev- 
eral denominations of Baptists that are less important than 
those before mentioned, because fewer in numbers. 

SEVENTH-DAY BAPTISTS. 

"The terms Sabbatarian and Seventh-day Baptists are 
used to designate those Christians who observe the seventh 
or last day of the week as the Sabbath. The former term 
was adopted in England soon after the Reformation, when 
the word Sabbath was applied exclasively to the seventh 
day, and v/hen those who observed that day were regarded 



192 BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 

as the only true Sabbath-keepers, or Sabbatarians. In 
the year 1818, this term was rejected by the General Con- 
ference in America, on account of its supposed indefinite- 
ness ; and the term Seventh-day Baptist was adopted in 
its stead, as more descriptive of the opinions and practices 
of the people. 

The Seventh-day Baptists are distinguished from Bap- 
tists generally by the views which they entertain of the 
Sabbath. In respect to this, they believe that the seventh 
day of the week was sanctified and blessed for the Sabbath 
in Paradise, and was designed for all mankind; that it 
forms a necessary part of the Ten Commandments, which 
are immutable in their nature, and universally binding ; 
that no change as to the day of the Sabbath was made by 
divine authority at the introduction of Christianity ; that 
those passages in the New Testament which speak of the 
first day of the week, do not imply either the substitution 
of that day for the seventh as the Sabbath, or its appoint- 
ment as a day of religious worship ; that whatever respect 
the early Christians paid to the first day of the week, on 
the supposition of its being the day of Christ's resurrec- 
tion, yet they never regarded it as the Sabbath, but conti- 
nued to observe the seventh day in that character until^ 
by edicts of emperors and the decrees of councils, the first 
day was made gradually to supersede it. 

" At what precise time the observers of the seventh day 
took a denominational form, it is not easy to say. Ac- 
cording to K-oss's 'Picture of all Eeligions,' they appeared 
in Germany late in the fifteenth or early in the sixteenth 
century. According to Dr. Chambers, they arose in Eng- 
land in the sixteenth century. Assuming the beginning 
of the sixteenth century as the true period of their origin, 
would carry them back as far as any of the modern deno- 
miiKitions of Christians date. But whatever difficulty 



BAPIISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 193 



V 



there may be in fixing tlie precise time of their origin as a 
denomination, the Seventh-day Baptists think there is no 
difficulty in proving the antiquity of their sentiments. In- 
deed, they believe that there has been no period since the 
commeD cement of the Christian era, when there were not 
upon the earth more or less Christians observing the sev- 
enth day. 

" They hold, in common with other Christians, the dis- 
tinguishing doctrines of Christianity. There were lately 
two congregations of the Sabbatarians in London ; one 
among the General Baptists, meeting in Mill Yard, the 
trust-deeds of which date as far back as 16T8, but which 
is now greatly reduced in number ; the other among the 
Particular Baptists, in Cripplegate. There are also a few 
to be found in different parts of the kingdom. 

The Seventh-day Baptists in America date from about 
the same period that their brethren in England began to 
organize regular churches. Mr. Stephen Mumford was 
one of the earliest among them. He came from England 
to Newport, R. I., in 1665, and ' brought with him the 
opinion, that the Ten Commandments, as they were deli- 
vered from Mount Sinai, were moral and immutable, and 
:hat it was an anti- Christian power which changed the 
Sabbath from the seventh to the first day of the week.' 
He joined the First-day Baptist church in Newport, and 
soon won several members of that church to his views. 
They continued to walk with the church, however, for a 
time, until a difficulty arose in consequence of the hard 
things which were said of them by their brethren, such as, 
that the Ten Commandments, being given to the Jews, 
were not binding upon the Gentiles, and that those who 
observed the seventh day were gone from Christ to Moses 
In November, 1671, they came to an open separation, 
when Stephen Mumford, William Hiscox, Samuel Hub 
17 N 



194 BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 

bard, Roger Baster, and three sisters, entered into cliurcb 
covenant together, thus forming the first Seventh-day Bap- 
tist church in America. William Hiscox was chosen and 
ordained their pastor, which office he filled until his death, 
in 1704, in the 66th year of his age. He was succeeded 
by William Gibson, a minister from London, who continued 
to labor among them until he died, in 1717, at the age of 
79 years. Joseph Crandall had been his colleague for two 
years, and was selected to succeed him. When he died, 
in 1737, Joseph Maxson was chosen pastor, and discharged 
the duties of the office until 1743. He was followed by 
William Bliss, who served the church as pastor until his 
death, in 1808, at the age of 81 years. Henry Burdick 
succeeded him in the pastoral office, and occupied that post 
until a few years ago, when he died. Besides the regular 
pastors, this church has ordained several ministers, from 
time to time, who have labored with great usefulness, both 
at home and abroad. It has also included among its 
members several distinguished characters, two of whom, 
Richard and Samuel Ward, governors of the State of 
Rhode Island, are well known to history. 

" For more than thirty years after its organization, the 
Newport church included nearly all persons observing the 
seventh day in the States of Rhode Island and Connecticut ; 
and its pastors were accustomed to hold stated meetinga 
at several distant places, for the better accommodation oi 
the widely-scattered members. But in 1708, the brethren 
living in what was then called Westerly R. I., (compre- 
hending all the south-western corner of the State,) thought 
best to form another society. Accordingly they proceeded 
to organize the Hopkinton church, which had a succession 
of worthy pastors, became very numerous, and built three 
raeeting-houses for the accommodation of the members )d 



BAPTISTS — MINDR DENOMINATIONS. 195 

the different neighborhoods. At present, there are seve: 
churches in Rhode Island, and one in Connecticut." 

There are four Seventh-day Baptist churches in New 
Jersey, more than twenty in the State of New York, and 
many more of later origin scattered over the South and 
West. 

It is now nearly a century and a half since a yearly 
meeting was e&tablished by this denomination in our 
country. A general conference was formed in 1800. The 
conference comprises four associations. 

They had, in 1873, 4 associations, 82 ordained ministers, 
10 licentiates, 75 churches, 7336 communicants, 55 Sunday- 
schools and 4906 teachers and scholars. 

EPHRATA SOCIETY OF SEVENTH-DAY BAPTISTS 

The Ephrata Society arose out of a division of the 
Dunkers, in about 1780. They observe the seventh day 
as the Sabbath. They form a settlement near Lancaster, 
Pa., much on the plan of the old Moravian communities. 

The Society was originated by Conrad Beissel, a native 
of Germany, and a Dunker. In 1725, he published a tract 
in defence of observing the seventh day as a holy time. 
This discussion attracted to his views several other Dunkers 
from the society at Mill Creek, Lancaster County. In 
1728, they formally adopted the seventh day as the day 
for public worship. In 1732, they established a monastic 
society at Ephrata. They adopted the habit of the Ca- 
puchin friars. The men wear a shirt, trowsers, and vest, 
with a long white gown, and cowl. The dress of the sisters 
IS the same, except that they wear petticoats in the place 
of trowsers, and a cowl of different shape. In 1740, 
there were in the cloister thirty-six single brethren and 
thirty-five sisters. No monastic vows were taken, and 
% community of goods was maintained. They conside? 



196 BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 

celibacy a virtue, and favorable to eminent holiness, but 
do not prohibit marriage. They receive the Sacred Scrip- 
tures as the only rule of faith. They hold to the divinity 
of Christ, the doctrine of the Trinity, salvation by grace 
alone, the baptism of believers only, which they administer 
by trine immersion, with the laying on of hands, while the 
recipient remains kneeling in the water. Their numbers 
are greatly diminished, and are now inconsiderable. 

MENNONITES. 

Edwards, the Baptist historian, informs us that some 
Mennonite families were in the province of Pennsylvania 
as early as the year 1692, who came hither from New 
York government, which at first belonged to the Dutch, 
and was called New Netherlands, extending from the river 
Delaware to the river of Connecticut. They settled in the 
neighborhood now called Germantown and Frankfort, &c. 
Other families soon followed ; and after them many came 
directly from Europe, insomuch that May 23, 1708, there 
was a church settled at Germantown, consisting of 52 
members, which exists to this day, (1770,) and is not only 
the first in the province, but, in some sort, the mother of 
all the rest. In about sixteen years after, this church had 
branched out to Skippeck, Conestoga, Great Swamp, and 
Monatony, and become five churches, to which appertained 
sixteen ministers, viz.: Rev. Messrs. Jacob Gottschalk, 
Henry Kolb, Martin Kolb, Cleas Johnson, Michael Zeigler, 
John Gorgas, John Conerads, Cleas Rittinghausen, Hans 
Burghaltzer, Christian Heer, Benedict Hirchy, Martir 
Beer, Johannes Bowman, Velter Clemer, Daniel Langan- 
ecker, and Jacob Beghtly. The present (1770) state of 
?Jie Mennonites in this province is as follows : 1st, their 
churches, which contain many branches, are 13 ; 2d, iho 
meeting houses belonging to them are 42 ; 3d, their or- 



BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 197 



dalned ministers or bishops are 15 ; 4th, their probationary 
or licensed preachers are 53 ; 5th, the families are about 
810, which, allowing five to a family, contain 4050 souls ; 
whereof 1448 persons are baptized and members of their 
churches. This account, I believe, is pretty exact, except 
the county of Lancaster hath introduced any error into it ; 
for in that county I have not met with as much readiness 
to give me the information I sought as in the other coun- 
ties, owing, I believe, to a suspicion that a knowledge of 
their state would, some way or other, be to their prejudice. 

" The Mennonites, in common with other communities, 
spread abroad in different directions. They formed settle- 
ments, and now have congregations and churches in Vir- 
ginia, Ohio, and Western New York, and the Canadas ; 
but they are the most numerous in the State where they 
first planted their standard on the American soil. This 
remark holds true of both the old and new connection. 

The new connection of Mennonites was formed by a 
seceding party from the old body, in 1811. Connected 
with it were about 700 members in Pennsylvania, from 
150 to 200 in New York, about 500 in Upper Canada, and 
small detachments of them are found in Maryland, Ohio, 
Indiana, &c. The cause of the separation was purely on 
the principles of experimental religion, which the new 
interest sought to inculcate and maintain, in the spirit as 
well as the letter, according to the pattern set them by 
Menno Simon and his associates. They complain that the 
old body 'have deviated from time to time and fallen 
away, particularly in the spiritual part of religion — have 
become lukewarm and carnally-minded, seeking transitory 
things more than spiritual, holding more to the letter and 
outward form, than to the spirit and real substance of 
religion.' " 

The Mennonites, a body, belong to the Baptist family, 

m 



198 BAPTISTS—MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 

though a small minority of them admit the validity of 
sprinkling and pouring, but all of them oppose infant bap- 
tism. They have a considerable membership in Canada, 
and about 40,000 Mennonites are to emigrate from Kussia , 
in 1874. Their statistics are imperfect. The latest give 
about 450 churches, nearly 500 ministers and, including 
Canada, about 75,000 members. They have 3 periodicals. 

TUNKERS OR DUNKERS. 
" The first appearing of these people in America Ts^as in 
the fall of the year 1719, when about twenty families 
landed in Philadelphia, and dispersed themselves, some to 
GermaKtown, some to Skippeck, some to Oley, some to 
Conestoga, and elsewhere. This dispersion incapacitated 
them to meet for public worship, and therefore they began 
to grow lukewarm in religion. But in the year 1722, 
Messrs. Baker, Gomery, Gantz, and the Trautea, visited 
their scattered brethren, which was attended with a great 
revival, insomuch that societies were formed wherever a 
number of families were within reach one of another. Bat 
this lasted not above three years. They settled on thdr 
lees again, till about thirty families more of their perbe- 
cuted brethren arrived in the fall of the year 1729, which 
both quickened them again and increased their number 
everywhere. These two companies had been members of 
one and the same church, which originated at Schwardze- 
nau, in the year 1708. The first constituents were Alex 
ander Mack and wife, John Kipin and wife, George Grevy, 
Andreas Bloney, Lucas Fetter, and Joanna Nethigeim. 
These had been bred Presbyterians, except Kipin, who was 
a Lutheran ; and being neighbors, they consorted together 
to read the Bible, and edify one another in the way they 
had been brought up, for as yet they did not know there 
were any Baptists in the world. However, believers' bap- 



BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 199 

tism and a congregational clinrcli soon gained upon them, 
insomucTi that thej had determined to obey the gospel in 
these matters. They desired Alexander Mack to baptize 
them ; but he, deeming himself in reality unbaptized, re- 
fused ; upon which they cast lots to find who should bo 
administrator. On whom the lot fell hath been carefully 
concealed. However, baptized they were in the river 
Eder, by Schwardzenau, and then formed themselves into 
a church, choosing Alexander Mack to be their minister. 
They increased fast, and began to spread their branches to 
Merienborn and Epstein, having John Naass and Christian 
Levy to their ministers in those places. But persecution 
quickly drove them thence, some to Holland and some to 
Creyfelt. Soon after, the mother church voluntarily re- 
moved from Schwardzenau to .Serustervin, in Friezland, 
and from thence migrated towards America, in 1719; and 
in 1729, those of Creyfelt and Holland followed their 
brethren. 

" Thus we see that all the Tunker churches in America 
sprang from the church at Schwardzenau, in Germany ; 
that that church began in 1708, with only seven souls, and 
that in a place where no Baptist had been in the memory 
of man, nor any now are. In sixty- two years that little 
one became a thousand, and that small one a great nation.'^ 

In doctrine the Tunkers incline to Arminianism, believ- 
ing in a general redemption, though in other doctrines they 
hold to the Confession of Dort, which is Calvinistic. They 
have been charged with believing in the final restoration 
of the wicked, but they deny holding any such views. 
They practice trine immersion, and in baptism incline the 
body forward instead of backward, as other Baptists do. 
They also practice laying on of hands and prayer while the 
person baptized is still in the water. They cel-ebrate the 
Lord's Supper, with the accompanying usages of love- 



200 BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIOiTS. 

feasts, the washing of feet, the kiss of charity and the 
right hand of fellowship. They also anoint the sick with 
oil for their recovery. In other matters they resemble the 
Friends, using great plainness of speech and dress, refusing 
to take legal oaths and to engage in war. They will not 
go to law, and generally will not take interest on money 
lent. Their officers are bishops or ministers, elders or 
teachers, deacons and deaconesses, these latter being aged 
women set apart for this special work. The ministers or 
bishops alone receive ordination. Until recently all ques- 
tions were decided by lot instead of by voting. They are 
a simple-hearted, consistent and unworldly people. They 
call themselves " German Baptists " and " Brethren.'' They 
have a great aversion to collecting their statistics, regard- 
ing it as one of the "vanities.'' As nearly as can be esti- 
mated, they have about 550 churches scattered through the 
Middle and Western States and territories, 1500 to 2000 
ministers and elders, and not far from 100,000 members. 
They are increasing with considerable rapidity. Most of 
them keep the seventh day of the week as the Sabbath. 

CHRISTIANS. 

This denomination call themselves Christians ; but as 
the name does not distinguish them from other Christians, 
and as the public must have a distinguishing appellation, 
the first part of the name is commonly pronounced as we 
pronounce the word Christ, when written by itself. Hence 
they are commonly called Christ-ians. One of their own 
writers gives the following account of their origin : 

"About fifty years ago, several Methodist preachers in 
he State of Virginia and in the Carolinas, became dissa 
tisfied with the discipline of that church, and withdrew. 
They then agreed to search the Scriptures for a rule of 
life, and to believe, preach, and walk as they should direct. 



BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 201 



The result was, they soon became agreed that Christian 
was the appropriate name for all the followers of Christ, 
as all true believers hold ; and that while others go far- 
ther, and take some sectarian name of human origin, they 
ought not, and would not, receive or use among themselves 
any other. By thus searching the Scriptures for a rule, 
they became satisfied that as that book contained the whole 
of the rule of duty and faith, so no other was necessary ; 
and all others, if authoritative, served to divide and lead 
astray. Here they settled down upon the broad plan of 
the name all believers take — Christian ; and the rule they 
all acknowledge — the Bible, 

"A few years after this, several ministers of the Pres- 
byterian order, in the State of Kentucky, broke oii fron? 
that body because of the government under which it acted ; 
and several of their usages appeared to them both unscrip- 
tural and oppressive. This act threw them upon the Bible, 
as the like act had thrown the seceders from the Metho- 
dists in Virginia ; and with the same result — for they soon 
agreed to be nothing but Christians, and to have no dis- 
cipline or rule but the Bible. 

''About the same time, a few ministers in New England, 
who had been connected with the Baptists, were led to see 
that human creeds were both useless and hurtful, and, in 
relinquishing these, they too were thrown upon the Bible 
alone. As they found there none of their names but 
Christian, and none of the modern denominational titles, 
they also soon agreed on that name, and on the Bible as 
their only rule of faith and practice. 

"Here, then, were three companies in the United States, 
all agreeing in these two points. But they were strangers 
to each other, and even to the fact that such companies 
existed. But in a few years each learned that others ex- 
isted, and by means of letters, and a periodical which waa 



202 BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 

soon commenced among the New England Christians, a 
correspondence was opened, and a union created, so that the 
three became one, and have to this day been known as the 
' Christian Connection in the United States of America/ " 
There was, after a few years, a separation between the 
two principal bodies composing this connection, the North- 
ern Convention, which was much the most numerous, adopt- 
ing, to a considerable extent, Unitarian or Socinian doc- 
trines,* and, though Baptists in regard to both the mode 
and subjects of baptism, yet affiliating with the Unitarians 
in their educational and religious enterprises. The Chris- 
tian Church South, on the other hand, were Trinitarians 
in doctrine, and opposed to introducing politics into the 
pulpit. Their doctrinal views are stated as follows : 

1. The Lord Jesus Christ is the only Head of the Church. 

2. The name is " Christian," to the exclusion of all party or sectarian 
names. 

3. The Holy Bible, or the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, 
are a sufficient rule of faith and practice. 

4. Christian character, or vital piety, is the only test of fellowship 
or church membership. 

5. The right of private judgment and the liberty of conscience are 
the privilege and duty of all. 

In Church government both bodies are Independents, 
though, like the Baptists and Congregationalists, they have 
their associations or conferences for mutual counsel and 
advice. The northern body has an "American Christian 
Convention North," composed of representatives from its 
sixty-five conferences. In 1872 it had 1198 ministers, 
1143 churches, 59,878 members, 28,753 Sunday-school 
scholars, 578 church edifices, $1,077,000 church property. 

The "General Convention of Christians of the South" 
had, the same year, 6 conferences, 90 ministers, 85 churches, 



^' The New England Christian churches are generally Trinitarian. 



BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 203 



11,287 members. They have a high school at Graham, 
N. C, and a paper called The Christian Sun/' edited by 
Elder W. B. Wellows, at Suffolk, Ya. 

The "Northern Convention of Christian Connection" 
has a joint interest with the Unitarians in Antioch College, 
Yellow Springs, Ohio ; and have Union Christian College, 
Merom, Sullivan county, Ind. ; a theological seminary at 
Wolfsborough, N. H. ; Wintersett College, at Wintersett, 
Iowa ; and several seminaries and academies. They have 
several papers, mostly published at Dayton, Ohio, though 
their first paper, " The Herald of Gospel Liberty," started 
in 1808, is still published at JSTewburyport, Mass. 

THE CHEISTIAN tlNION CHURCHES. 

These churches took form as " The Christian Union" in 
1863. For several years previous churches had existed as 
independent bodies in various sections of this country with- 
out the knowledge of each other, though established on 
almost the same platform both as to doctrine and polity. 
The increase of such churches soon became so great that 
their existence became known to each other, and a con- 
vention, composed of representatives from many of said 
churches, was held in the city of Columbus, Ohio, early in 
the spring of 1863. In this convention churches of five 
leading denominations were represented, who at that time 
had assumed the Union position in preference to that occu- 
pied by the sects to which they had previously belonged. 
Shortly after the Columbus Convention, similar conven- 
tions met in Illinois, Indiana and Iowa, when the same 
declarations were made. 

The marvellous and rapid growth of these Union 
churches soon called for the meeting of a general and dele- 
gated council, composed of clergymen and laymen from 
all the States containing Christian Union churches. This 



204 BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 

council met at Terre Haute, Ind., June 29, 1865, and con- 
tinued in session for four days, at which time a more per- 
fect co-operative union was formed for general interests. 
In this council, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and 
Iowa were represented, and a number of the ablest clergy- 
men of these States were members of the body. 

Four General Councils have been held, the last being 
held at Salem, Illinois, commencing May 30, 1872. In 
the Salem Council the following States were represented : 
Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Arkan- 
sas, Texas, Nebraska and Kansas. The Christian Union 
churches have an organ called the " Christian Witness," 
edited by Elder J. Y. B. Flack, and published by J. W. 
Bowen, McArthur, Ohio, who is the publisher of the 
Christian Union literature throughout the States. 

The following are the principles maintained by the 
Christian Union churches: 1. The oneness of the Church ; 
2. Christ the only Head ; 3. The Bible the only rule of 
faith and practice ; 4. " Good fruits " the only condition of 
fellowship; 5. The repudiation of controversy ; 6. Each 
local church governs itself ; 7. No preaching of partisan 
politics. 

They have a selection of hymns compiled by Judge V. 
E. Shaw, of Lancaster, Ohio, and have published a num- 
ber of works advocating their distinctiv^e views. The 
principal doctrine of the Christian Union is the unity of 
the Church of Christ on a basis common to all Christians. 
They fellowship all who take Christ for their Head, the 
Bible for their creed, and show ^' by their fruits " that they 
are Christians. Every Christian in the world can be iden- 
tified with this reform without the sacrifice of a single 
principle. Their motto is the famous Augustinian saying, 
"In things essential, Unity; in ?2072-essentials. Liberty; 
and in all things. Charity." They number about 30,000 



BAPTISTS — MINOE DENOMINATIONS. 205 

church memberSj and about 150^000 attend their ministry. 
They have many very excellent church edifices, all of 
which are free. They have established Sunday-schools, 
high schools and several benevolent associations, and are 
very active in revival and missionary work among the 
destitute. 

SIX PRINCIPLE BAPTISTS. 

" The appellation of Six Principle Baptists is applied 
at the present time to a few churches in Ehode Island and 
a few other States, who, grounding their belief on Heb. vi. 
1-3, make the imposition of hands on all newly baptized 
members an indispensable pre-requisite to church fellow- 
ship and communion. As the people of this sentiment 
were among the first settlers in the State, where most of 
them now reside, the Old Baptists is a term very com- 
monly applied to them, to distinguish them from their 
brethren of less rigid views on the rite in question. For 
a long time after the settlement of Rhode Island, the Six 
Principle Baptists had a controlling influence in Baptist 
affairs in the State; but some of their churches have be- 
come extinct, and others have ceased to maintain on this 
point the sentiments of their progenitors ; and the Ortho- 
dox, Freewill and other classes of Baptists occupy a large 
portion of the ground where the old order formerly almost 
exclusively prevailed. Within a few years they have 
divided into two* bodies, each claiming to be regular. The 
two have 16 or 17 churches, 12 ministers and about 1800 
members. 

THE CHURCH OF GOD. 

This is a small denomination of Baptists, organized in 
1830 by Rev. John Winebrenner, formerly a minister of 
the German Reformed Church in Harrisburg, Pa. He 
had been very successful in his pastorate, but, being charged 
with an inclination to Arminian views, he withdrew from 

18 



206 BAPTISTS — MINOR DENOMINATIONS. 

that Church in 1830, and, with several other ministers who 
sympathized with him, organized a new Church, of which 
he declared the only scriptural name was The Church of 
God/^ 

The following summary of their doctrines is derived 
from one of their most eminent ministers : 

They incline rather to the Arminian than the Calvin- 
istic view of redemption, but are thoroughly evangelical 
as that term is generally understood. They are in unison 
with the regular Baptists both as to the mode and subjects 
of baptism. They hold that there are three positive ordi- 
nances of perpetual standing in the Church, viz., Baptism, 
Feet- washing and the Lord's Supper. They are very stren- 
uous on the obligation to observe the ordinance of washing 
the saints' feet. They believe in the very frequent admin- 
istration of the Lord's Supper, to Christians only, in a 
sitting posture, and always in the evening. They are in 
favor of revivals and special efforts for the conversion of 
sinners. In regard to the Second Coming of Christ they 
are Millenarians, and on the great questions of total absti- 
nence from intoxicating liquors, slavery and war they have 
taken the most advanced position as Reformers. Their 
Church government is peculiar. They claim to be inde- 
pendent and Congregational, yet every church has its coun- 
cil, composed of the preachers in charge, the elders and the 
deacons, which possesses all the powers o^the Church ses- 
sion in the Presbyterian Church, or the consistory in a 
German Reformed Church. They have also their Annual 
Eldership, consisting of all the pastors and an equal num- 
ber of ruling elders within a given district, and a Trien- 
nial General Eldership, composed of delegates from the 
Annual Elderships, who, if preachers, must have been at 
least five years in the ministry. This General Eldership 
owns and controls all the Church property of the denomi- 



UNITARIANS. 



207 



nation. Its officers are : ministers, who may be either sta- 
tioned pastors, itinerants on circuits or missionaries at large ; 
ruling elders and deacons. The Church has a domestic 
and a foreign missionary society and a printing establish- 
ment. They issue three papers, two of them weekly. They 
have two collegiate institutions, and have an interest and 
professorship in the Freewill Baptist College at Hillsdale, 
Michigan. In 1874 their strength was estimated (there 
are no very definite statistics) at 400 churches, 350 minis- 
ters and about 30,000 members. Their churches are mostly 
in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, 
Kansas and Nebraska. 



UNITAEIANS. 

Unitarians take their name from that point of belief 
(Vhereon they first diveiged from the generally held views 
of Christians. Their fundamental principle may be stated 
to be the trustworthiness of the human faculties, and their 
competency, when duly trained and freed from prejudice, to 
receive moral and religious, no less than scientific, truths. 
In pursuance of this principle, they have carried to the 
farthest point yet reached by any denomination the Prot- 
estant belief in the right of private judgment and rever- 
ence for the individual conscience. They do not hesitate 
to bring all t<heological systems and the sacred writings 
of both Jews and Christians to this test. What does the 
best instructed reason, the clearest ascertained science, 
and the most enlightened conscience decide upon them 
Believing truth to be infinite, they have always declined 
to lay down any set of dogmas which should pretend to 
include it all, or to make a belief in special dogmas a 
test of fellowship. A very wide range of individual opin- 
ion is hence included in this body, it having always been 



208 



UNITARIANS. 



its cardinal doctrine that unity of spirit and aim should 
take precedence of unity of thought. There is, however, 
a general similarity of conclusion arrived at by this free 
action of mind upon religious thought, of which the fol- 
lowing is an outline: (1.) A belief in a supreme God of 
unchanging goodness and wisdom, whose will and attri- 
Dutes are made known to us in the universal order of 
things so far as we can understand it, in human experi- 
ence so far as it has been transmitted to us, and in our 
owai reason and conscience so far as we will examine 
them. (2.) A grateful recognition of J esus as the Founder 
of the Christian religion, and the great Leader and In- 
spirer of all who seek to lead a holy life, with a growing 
tendency to see in him this entire and perfect humanity. 
(3.) A persuasion that man's highest duty is to live in 
love toward his fellow-man, and in perfect fidelity to 
those convictions of truth Avhich he has attained. (4.) 
A belief that the moral order which reigns here reigns 
throughout the universe, eternally rewarding all right 
action and purpose, and eternally overthrowing and pun- 
ishing all wrong action and purpose. 

In this country, the divergence of many of the Con- 
gregational churches of New England from the older 
standards toward this type came into notice about a cen- 
tury ago. Among a people so interested in theology as 
New Englanders then were, earnest discussion was at once 
provoked, and it was finally found that about a third of 
the churches held these views. New England, especially 
Massachusetts, still remains the centre of this form of 
faith, though single churches are found in almost all the 
large cities of the North and West. The Unitarian ^' Year 
Book" for 1874 gives the number of conferences as 21 ; of 
societies, as 358 ; of ministers, as 398. There are not, prob- 
ably, more than about 40,000 members of these churches, 



UNIVERSALISTS. 



209 



but the adherent population may amount to about 100,000. 
Their church property amounts to $6,282,000. They are 
not increasing very rapidly in numbers. They have under 
their control three colleges, viz.. Harvard University ; An- 
tioch College, Yellow Springs, Ohio, and Humboldt College, 
Humboldt, Iowa. They have also three theological schools 
— Cambridge Divinity School, the Boston School for the . 
Ministry, and the Meadville Theological Seminary, Mead- 
ville. Pa. They have four or five periodicals. 



UNIVEHSALISTS. 

Theee are two classes of Christians that have passed 
under this general name — Universalists, so called, and 
Restorationists. They were formerly reckoned one. 

The E,estorationists held the doctrine of punishment in 
the future state, but maintained that all mankind would be 
ultimately restored. 

The other class, which embraces but few of either clergy 
or laity, maintain that every human being, on dying, passes 
immediately into a state of eternal happiness. They are 
Unitarians in doctrine, and allege that sin brings its own 
punishment, and consequently that to punish men in a 
future state would be unjust. Most of the Universalists in 
this country are Restorationists. Of this class was Dr. 
Benneville, of Germantown, Pa., and Rev. John Murray, 
who came hither from England in 1770. 

In 1780, Rev. Elhanan Winchester, a Baptist preacher, 
embraced the doctrine of Universalism. About ten years 
subsequent to this, the Rev. Hosea Ballou embraced the 
same doctrine, but not the Restorationist view. He may 
be properly regarded as the founder of the Church in the 

18* 



210 



UNIVERSALISTS. 



United States, though the doctrines he preached have been 
considerably modified. 

The " Universalist Expositor" gives the following sta- 
tistics of the denomination : 

" The ministry of the Universalist denomination in the 
United States hitherto has been provided for, not so much 
by the means of schools, as by the unaided but irresistible 
influence of the Gospel of Christ. This has furnished the 
denomination with its most successful preachers. It has 
turned them from other sects and doctrines, and brought 
them out from forests and fields, and from secular pursuits 
of almost every kind, and driven them, with inadequate 
literary preparation, to the work of disseminating the 
truth. This state of things has been unavoidable, and the 
effect of it is visible. It has made the ministry of the 
Universalist denomination very different from that of any 
other sect in the country ; studious of the Scriptures, con- 
fident in the truth of their distinguishing doctrine, zealous, 
firm, industrious : depending more on the truths commu- 
nicated for their success, than on the manner in which 
they were stated. It has had the effect, too, to give the 
ministry a polemic character, — the natural result of unwa- 
vering faith in the doctrine believed, and of an introduc- 
tion into the desk without scholastic training. But the 
attention of the denomination in various parts of the coun- 
try has of late been turned to the education of the ministry; 
and conventions and associations have adopted resolves, 
requiring candidates to pass examinations in certain 
branches of literature. The same motives have governed 
many in their effort to establish literary and theological 
institutions," 

Their educational institutions were as follows in Janu- 
ary, 1874: Tuffs College and Tuft's Divinity School, 
College Hill, Medford, Mass. (largely endowed, and having 



UNIVERSALISTS. 



211 



80 students) ; Lombard University, Galesburg, 111., also 
liberally endowed, 100 students; St. Lawrence University 
and Canton Theological School, Canton, N. Y., moderately 
endowed, 79 students; Smithson College, Logansport,Ind., 
90 students; Bechtel College, Akron, Ohio, founded in 
1870, a small endowment, 200 students ; Liberal Institute, 
Clinton, N. Y. ; Westbrook Seminary, Leering, Maine ; 
Green Mountain Perkins Academy, South Woodstock, Yt. ; 
Goddard Seminary, Barre, Yt. ; Liberal Institute, Jeffer- 
son, Wis. ; Dean Academy, Franklin, Mass. ; Mitchell 
Seminary, Mitchellville, Iowa: in all, 12 literary and 2 
theological schools and colleges, with 1195 students, 98 
professors and teachers, and assets amounting to almost 
$3,000,000. 

They have five weekly newspapers, one bi-weekly peri- 
odical, one literary and religious monthly, one quarterly 
and three minor papers. The Universalist Publishing 
House at Boston was founded in 1862, and in 1874 had 
assets amounting to $37,976.09. It publishes 119 volumes 
and six periodicals. 

In 1864 the Convention passed resolutions sustaining 
the government in the war for the Union, condemning 
oppression, and remonstrating against any concession to 
traitors, and any movement or adjustment which might 
put our colored soldiers at the mercy of their old masters. 
During the two years, 1864 and 1865, it was stated that 
the denomination had raised over half a million dollars 
for educational purposes. At the Convention of 1865 a 
Board of Missions was elected, and it was resolved to 
raise one hundred thousand dollars for their use. In 
1866 the Convention met at Galesburg, Illinois, when it 
was reported that but seventeen thousand dollars of this 
amount had been raised. Stringent resolutions against 
the policy of the President, and in favor of impartial 



212 



UNIVERSALISTS. 



suffrage, were adopted. Eesolutions of sympathy with 
Unitarians, and offering to unite with them in any way 
practicable in the Christianizing of the world, were 
adopted by a large majority. In the Convention of the 
following year, this action was qualified, if not virtually 
rescinded, by a resolution affirming the divine authority 
of Scripture and the Lordship of Christ, as tests of 
church membership. Only one person voted in the nega- 
tive. A Universalist preacher in Boston, who had had 
trouble with his congregation on account of the extreme 
Unitarian views which he preached, was refused admis- 
sion to the Convention by a vote of 95 to 16. At this 
Convention, it was again resolved to raise one hundred 
thousand dollars for denominational purposes. The Con- 
vention received an act of incorporation, March 9, 1866. 
In 1868 resolutions were adopted recognizing a call for 
a general spiritual awakening and recommending confer- 
ence and prayer meetings, wherever practicable. In 1869 
two new State Conventions, those of Missouri and Kansas, 
were recognized and admitted by their delegates into the 
General Convention, and arrangements were perfected for 
a very earnest demonstration in behalf of all the interests 
of the body during the following year, which was the cen- 
tenary of the establishment of Uuiversalism as an organ- 
ized church in America. 

The Register for 1871 says that the preceding or cen- 
tenary year was one of unprecedented activity throughout 
the denomination. Of the proposed Murray Centenary 
Fund of $200,000, $120,000 was raised. The income 
only is to be used and applied to aid theological students, 
in the distribution of denominational literature, and in 
church extension. 

Statistics of 1873-4: 1 General Convention, meeting 
annually ; 7-1 associations ; 954 parishes, with 40,032 fam- 



S WEDENBOilGIA / 



213 



ilies, or about 200,000 persons adherent ; 638 churches ; 
657 ministers ; a little more than 28,000 members of the 
churches; 661 Sunday-schools, with 54,532 scholars; 761 
church edifices, of the estimated value of $7,845,447. 
Besides the Murray Centenary Fund, now amounting to 
nearly $130,000, the denomination has a fund for the 
relief of disabled clergymen, a Woman's Centenary Fund 
and some others. They are taking much interest in Sun- 
day-schools and some in home missionary enterprises. 

The Register speaks of the better education of their min- 
isters, the improving tone of spiritual culture among their 
people, the multiplying and strengthening of their religious, 
educational and benevolent institutions as exhibited by 
their record. 



SWEDENBOEGIANS. 

The Swedenborgians are so called from the late Hon. 
Emanuel Swedenborg, son of Jasper Swedenborg, bishop 
of West-Gothia. He was born at Stockholm, in the year 
1689 ; and died in London, 1772. 

He early enjoyed all the advantages of a liberal educa- 
tion, having studied with great attention in the academy 
of Upsal, and in the universities of England, Holland, 
France, and Germany. Endued with uncommon talents 
for the acquirement of learning, his progress in the sciences 
was rapid and extensive ; and, at an early period in life, 
he distinguished himself by various publications on philo- 
sophical subjects. 

His philosophic studies led him to refer natural pheno* 
mena to spiritual agency, and to suppose that there is a 
close connection between the two worlds of matter and 
spirit. Hence his system teaches us to consider all tho 
visible universe, with everything that it contains, as a 
theatre and representation of the invisible world, from 



214 



SWEDENEORGIANS. 



which it first derived its existence, and by connection with 
which it continually subsists. 

Swedenborg's extraordinary genius and learning, ac 
companied with the purity of his life and uprightness of 
his character, attracted the public notice. Hence he 
received various literary and political honors. These, 
however, he considered of small importance, compared with 
the distinguished privilege of having, as he supposed, his 
spiritual sight opened, and conversing with spirits and 
angels in the spiritual world. 

He first began to have his revelation in London. He 
asserted that, on a certain night, a man appeared to him 
in the midst of a strong shining light, and said, " I am 
God, the Lord, the Creator, and Redeemer ; I have chosen 
thee to explain to men the interior and spiritual sense of the 
sacred writings. I will dictate to thee what thou oughtest 
to write." He affirmed that, after this period, his spiritual 
sight was opened so far that he could see, in the most clear 
and distinct manner, what passed in the spiritual world, 
and converse with angels and spirits in the same manner 
as with men. Accordingly, in his Treatise concerning 
Heaven and Hell," he relates the wonders which he saw 
in the invisible worlds, and gives an account of various and 
heretofore unknown particulars, relating to the peace, the 
happiness, the light, the order of heaven, together with 
the forms, the functions, the habitations, and even the 
garments of the heavenly inhabitants. He relates hi^ 
conversations with angels, and describes the condition of 
Jews, Mahometans, Christians, clergymen of every deno 
mination, laity, &c., in the other world. 

Swedenborg called the doctrines which he delivered,. 

The Heavenly Doctrines of the Kew Jerusalem.** It 
is thus styled, for, according to his system, the New 
Jerusalem signifies the new church upon earth, which ih 



SWEDENBORGIANS. 



215 



now about to be established by the Lord, and whicli is 
particularly described, as to its glory and excellency, in 
Rev. xxi., and many other parts of the sacred word. 

The holy city, or New Jerusalem, he interpreted as 
descriptive of a new dispensation of heavenly truth, break- 
ing through and dissipating the darkness which at this 
day prevails on earth. The laws of divine order, and the 
economy of God's kingdom, providence, and operation, 
will be more clearly and fully understood, and the hearts 
of men will thus be opened to a nearer intercourse with 
heaven, and rendered admissive of the purer influences of 
gospel love and charity in their lives and conversation. 

The following extract contains the general outlines of 
Swedenborg's theological system : 

First. That the Sacred Scripture contains three distinct 
senses, called celestial, spiritual, and natural; and that, 
in each sense, it is divine truth, accommodated respectively 
to the angels of the three heavens, and also to men on 
earth. 

2dly. That there is a correspondence between all things 
in heaven and all things in man ; and that this science of 
correspondences is a key to the spiritual or internal sense 
of the Sacred Scriptures, every page of which is written 
by correspondences, that is, by such things in the natural 
world as correspond unto and signify things in the spiritual 
world. 

3dly. That there is a divine trinity of Fi^ther, Son, and 
Holy Ghost, or, in other words, of the all-begetting Di- 
vinity, {Divinum a quo) the divine human, and the divine 
proceeding or operation ; and that this trinity consisteth 
not of three distinct persons, but is united, as body, soul, 
and operation in man, in the one person of the Lord Jesus 
Christ, who, therefore, is the God of heaven, and alone to 



216 



SWELENBORGIANS. 



be worshipped, being Creator from eternity, Redeemer in 
time, and Regenerator to eternity. 

4tlily. That redemption consisteth not in the vicarious 
sacrifice of the Redeemer, and an atonement to appease 
the Divine wrath, but in a real subjugation of the powers 
of darkness; in a restoration of order and good govern- 
ment in the spiritual world : in checking the overgrown 
influences of wicked spirits on the souls of men, and open- 
ing a nearer and clearer communication with the heavenly 
and angelic powers ; in making salvation, which is regene- 
ration, possible for all, who believe on the incarnate God, 
and keep his commandments. 

5thly. That there is an universal influx from God into 
the souls of men. The soul, upon receiving this influx 
from God, transmits it, through the perceptive faculties of 
the mind, to the body. The Lord, with all his divine 
wisdom, consequently with all the essence of faith and 
charity, entereth by influx into every man, but is received 
by every man according to his state and form. Hence it 
is that good influxes from God are changed, by the evil 
nature of their recipients, into their opposites, good into 
evil, and truth into falsehood. 

Gthly. That we are placed in this world, subject to the 
mfluences of two most opposite principles ; of good from 
the Lord and his holy angels ; of evil from hell or evil 
spirits. While we live in this world, our spirits have their 
abode in the spiritual world, where we are kept in a kind 
of spiritual equilibrium by the continual action of those 
contrary powers, in consequence of which, we are at per- 
fect liberty to turn to which we please. That, without 
this /ret? will in spiritual things, regeneration cannot be 
efi*ected. If we submit to God we receive real life from 
him ; if not, we receive that life from hell, which is callec' 
in Scripture, spiritual death. 



SWEDENBORGIANS. 



217 



7thly. That heaven and hell are not arbitrary appoint- 
ments of God. Heaven is a state arising from the good 
affections of the heart, and a correspondence of the words 
and actions, grounded on sincere love to God and man , 
and hell k the necessary consequence of an evil and 
thoughtless life, enslaved by the vile affections of self-love 
and love of the world without being brought under the 
regulations of heavenly love by a right submission of the 
will, the understanding, and actions, to the truth and 
spirit of heaven. 

8thly. That there is an intermediate state for departed 
souls which is called the world of spirits, and that very 
few pass directly to heaven or hell. This is a state of 
purification to the good ; but to bad spirits it is a state of 
separation of all the extraneous good from the radical evil 
which constitutes the essence of their natures. 

9thly. That, throughout heaven, such as are of like dis- 
positions and qualities are consociated into particular fel- 
lowships ; and such as differ in these respects are separated, 
so that every society in heaven consists of similar members. 

lOthly. That man, immediately on his decease, rises 
again in a spiritual body, which was inclosed in his material 
body ; and that, in this spiritual body, he lives as a man 
to eternity, either in heaven, or in hell, according to the 
quality of his past life. 

llthly. That those passages in the Sacred Scripture 
generally supposed to signify the destruction of the world 
by fire, &c., commonly called the last judgment, must be 
understood according to the above-mentioned science of 
correspondences, which teaches, that by the end of the 
world or consummation of the age, is not signified the 
destruction of the world, but the end or consummation of 
the present Christian church, both among Roman Catholica 
wid Protestants of every description and denomination. 

19 



218 



SW EDEUBORGIANS. 



That thiy consummation, wliicli consists in tlie total falsi- 
fication of the Divine truth, and adulteration of the Divine 
good of the word, has actually taken place ; and, together 
with the estahlishment of a new church, in place of the 
former, is described in the Revelations, in the internal 
sense of that book ; in which the new church i& meant, as 
to its internals, by the new heaven, and as to its externals, 
by the new earth ; also, by the New Jerusalem descending 
ly Crod out of heaven. 

It is one of the leading doctrines of Swedenborg, in hia 
explanation of the other books of Scripture, that one of 
the principal uses for which the Word is given, is that it 
might be a medium of communication between the Lord 
and man; also, that earth might be thereby conj^iined 
with heaven, or human minds with angelic minds ; which 
is ejfected by correspondences, and natural things with 
spiritual, according to which the Word is written; and 
that, in order to its being divine {divinum verum in 
ultimo^ it could not be written otherwise. That hence, 
in many parts of the letter, the Word is clothed with 
appearances of truths accommodated to the apprehension 
of the simple and unlearned ; as, when evil passions are 
attributed to the Lord, and whei-e it is said, that he with- 
holdeth his mercy from man, forsakes him, casts him into 
hell, doeth evil, &;c. ; whereas such things do not at all 
belong to the Lord, but are so said, in the same manner 
as we speak of the sun's rising and setting, and othei 
natural phenomena, according to the appearance of things, 
or as they appear to the outward senses. To the taking 
up such appearances of truth from the letter of Scripture, 
and making this or that point of faith, derived from them, 
the essential of the church, instead of explaining them by 
doctrine drawn from the genuine truths, which, in other 
parts of the Word, are left naked, Swedenborg ascribes 



i 



SWEDENBOEGIANS. 



219 



the various dissensions and heresies which have arisen 
in the church, and which, he says, could not be pre- 
vented, consistently with the preservation of man's free 
agency, both with respect to the exertion of his will, and 
of his understanding. But yet, he says, every one, in 
whatever heresy he may be with respect to the under- 
Btanding, may still be reformed and saved, provided he 
shuns evils as sifis, and does not confirm heretical tastes 
in himself; for, by shunning evils as sins, the will is re- 
formed, and by the will, the understanding, which then 
first emerges out of darkness into light. That the word, 
in its lowest sense, is thus made the medium of salvation 
to those who are obedient to its precepts ; while this sense 
serves to guard its internal sanctities from being violated 
by the wicked and profane, and is represented by the 
chorubim placed at the gates of Eden, and the flaming 
sw;rd turning every way to guard the tree of life. 

Tlis doctrine respecting differences of opinion in the 
church is summed up in these words : " There are three • 
essentials of the church: an acknowledgment of the Lord's 
diA inity ; an acknowledgment of the holiness of the Word ; 
and the life, which is charity. Conformable to his life, 
i. e, to his charity, is every man's real faith. From the 
Wcrd he hath the knowledge of what his life ought to be ; 
and from the Lord he hath reformation and salvation. If 
these three had been held as essentials of the church, in- 
tellectual dissensions would not have divided it, but would 
only have varied it, as the light varieth colors in beautiful 
objects, and as various jewels constitute the beauty of a 
kingly crown." 

The moral doctrines of the New Jerusalem Church are 
comprised under general heads, collected from Sweden- 
borg's writings, and prefixed to some proposals, published 



220 



SWEDENBORQIANS. 



m England, for the organization and establishment of a 
society. 

Under those general heads, it is proposed to promote 
marriages upon the principles of the new church, which 
are, that true conjugal love consists in the most perfect 
and intimate union of minds, which constitutes one life, as 
the will and understanding are united in one. That this 
love exists only with those who are in states of regenera- 
tion. That, after the decease of conjugal partners of this 
description, they meet, and all the mere natural loves 
being separated, the mental union is perfected, and they 
are exalted into the wisdom and happiness of the angelic 
life. 

Swedenborg founded his doctrines on the spiritual sense 
of the Word of God, which he declared was revealed to 
him immediately from the Lord out of heaven. As hia 
language is peculiar, his reasoning cannot be abridged so 
as to be rendered intelligible to the generality of readers. 
Those who are desirous of farther information are referred 
to his numerous and singular productions. 

Those who embrace the tenets of Swedenborg are nu- 
merous in England, Germany, Sweden, &c. Societies 
are also formed in different parts of Europe, for spreading 
his doctrines ; and, where societies have not been formed, 
there are individuals who admire his writings and embrace 
his sentiments, particularly in England, France, Germany, 
Holland, Sweden, Russia, Poland, Turkey, and even in the 
East and West Indies, and America. 

Their ecclesiastical order is a mixture of Presbyterian- 
ism and Congregationalism. 

They practise baptism and the Lord's Supper, and use 
confirmation, the solemnization of matrimony, after the 
ordinary ceremony at church, and a burial service. Thev 
approximate to an independent form of church govera 



S W E D E N B R G I A N S . 



221 



ment, but tlieir discipline is not yet definitely settled. No 
candidate for ordination can be admitted till after lie lias 
been baptized into the faith of the new church, the formula 
of which is — " I baptize thee into the name of the Lord 
Jesi«3 Christ, who is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit." 

The first person who introduced Swedenborgianism into 
this country was a Mr. Glen, who delivered lectures on the 
subject in Philadelphia, in 1784. The first American min- 
ister was ordained in 1798. 

It was not the policy of the founder of the New Jerusa- 
lem Church, nor of his earlier followers, to organize a large 
Church. Both he and they preferred to remain in the com- 
munions to which they already belonged, and to propagate 
their views among their members. Thus it has resulted 
that while the outw^ard progress of the Church has been 
apparently slow, it has had a considerable number of active 
adherents and propagandists, in almost every Protestant 
denomination. Of late years it has given more attention 
to the organization of distinct churches. Its statistics are, 
however, very incomplete. The United States census of 
1870 reports 90 church organizations, and 61 church edi- 
fices, with 18,755 sittings, and church property valued at 
$869,700. From other sources we gather that the number 
of ministers is not more than 70, and that the avowed mem- 
bership does not exceed 5000. They have a collegiate 
institution at Urbanna, Ohio, with a small endowment, a 
theological school at Waltham, Mass., with 63 students, 
and 3 other schools. They have also a tract society; a 
publishing house, with a capital of $20,000 ; 3 periodicals 
and a number of books. 

They have a General Convention and associations in 
Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, 
Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Missouri and New York, besides 
four isolated societies. 

19* 



222 



CONGREGATIONALISTS. 



CONGREGATIONALISTS. 

Scriptural Congregationalism denotes a system ot 
self-governed local churches, each free and yet all in fel- 
lowship with each other. Each church is composed of 
regenerated men statedly meeting in one place, united by 
a covenant for the worship of God and for holy living 
in all things. The Bible is regarded by them as the only 
and sufficient rule of ecclesiastical order, as well as of 
faith. There is no legislative or judicial power above the 
local church. Each church has full power to choose its 
officers, to receive members, to exercise discipline, and to 
do all things required for the common welfare. Congre- 
gational churches, though thus free and self-governed, are 
not so disjoined as to be insulated elements, but are united 
to Christ in one common cause, are in sympathy and fel- 
lowship with each other, which is to be manifested in all 
appropriate ways — by exchange of members by letter, by 
regarding and sustaining the discipline of each other, by 
meeting in council as occasion may require, and, if neces- 
sary, by admonition and reproof. If any church becomes 
unsound in doctrine or scandalous or immoral in practice, 
and will not be reformed by admonition and council, the 
sound churches are to withdraw fellowship from the of- 
fending church. 

On these principles were the apostolic churches organ- 
ized, as is confessed by Mosheim, Gibbon, Barrow, and 
other eminent scholars of all denominations. These prin- 
ciples were in process of time suppressed by centralized 
and despotic organizations, though in every age some have 



CONGREGATIONALIBTS. 



223 



held to them to some extent. But after the Reformati(yH 
restored the study of the Bible they were once more fully 
developed and reduced to practice by the modern Congre- 
gational churches. 

The freedom and self-government of the local churches 
^ere developed and reduced to practice by Robert Brown 
n 1586. But he did not as fully develop the fellowship 
of the churches as the scriptural ideal requires. Those 
who adopted his views were at first called Brownists. 
Others v/ho more fully but not completely developed the 
fellowship of the churches, throwing off his name, were 
called Independents. In New England the name Inde- 
pendents was also rejected, and the fellowship of the 
churches was fully developed, and the name Congrega- 
tionalist assumed in the Cambridge platform. For a time, 
in England, the name Independents was used to denote 
Congregationalists, but there also the name Congrega- 
tionalist has superseded it, as may be seen in the Savoy 
declaration, and in the declaration of the Congregational 
Union of England and Wales. 

Having given this general view of the use of names 
and the relations of Brownists, Independents, and Con- 
gregationalists, let us follow the course of historical de- 
velopment. Robert Brown became prominent among those 
who, in 1567, resisted the attempts of Queen Elizabeth 
of England to suppress, by forcible measures, the doc- 
trines and assemblies of the Puritans. Brown contended 
that each church or society of Christians meeting in a 
single place was a body corporate, possessing full power 
wii\in itself to admit or exclude members, to choose and 
ordain officers, and also to depose them, without being in 
any respect responsible to synods, councils, or any other 
ecclesiastical authority. He denied the supremacy of the 
queen in religious and ecclesiastical matters, he refused 



224 CONGREGATIONALISTS. 

to admit that the established Church of England was a 
scriptural church, and asserted that the Scriptures were 
the only authoritative guide in matters of faith and dis- 
cipline. He also held that the labors of a pastor should 
be confined to a single church, and that five orders or 
offices should be recognized in the Christian Church — 
namely, pastor, teacher, elder, deacon, and widow. Ha 
also asserted that the priesthood should not be regarded 
as a distinct order from the laity. Brown arrived at the 
conviction of all these doctrines, and publicly proclaimed 
them as a separate system of belief, in 1586. 

As might have been naturally expected in such an age, 
and among such a community as England then was, the 
announcement of such opinions soon led to persecution. 
Brown was hooted in the streets, pelted with stones, and 
became the victim of general obloquy. Nevertheless, he 
persisted in his course, and succeeded in assembling and 
organizing the first church on independent principles 
known to exist in modern times. This fact only led to 
more violent persecution, and the members of his society 
were visited with fines, arrests, imprisonments, and in some 
instances with death, until at last the condition of the per- 
secuted Puritans became intolerable. They accordingly 
resolved to escape, and fled in a body to Holland. Brown 
subsequently ventured to return to England, but he was 
unable to accomplish anything there, in consequence of 
the general outburst of persecution which overwhelmed 
him, not only from the fanatical mobs in the streets and 
in the community, but even from the pulpits and from 
the judicial bench. 

In 1602 a second society called Independents or Con- 
gregationalists was formed in the north of England, of 
whom Jolin Kobinson was the pastor. By them the fel- 
lowship of the churches was more fully developed, espc- 



CONGREGATION ALISTS. 



225 



cially in New England. Robinson was a man of strong 
mind and superior intelligence. Although he and his 
associates lived blamelessly in the world, merely worship- 
ping God according to the dictates of their own consciences, 
) et they were soon surrounded and afilicted with the se- 
verest persecution. The whole power of the government 
and of the prelatical establishment was brought to bear 
upon them, and they soon found it necessary to seek re- 
pose and safety in flight. Mr. Robinson and his associates 
projected a plan of escape to Holland, but their purpose 
was frustrated by the treachery of the captain of the vessel 
which they had engaged. He happened to be a prelatist, 
and betrayed them to the authorities. They were im- 
prisoned for a time, as a punishment for offences the 
nature of which was undefined and unknown. 

Undaunted by these reverses, a portion of Robinson's 
followers made a second attempt to flee from the heavy 
hand of tyranny, which proved more successful. In the 
spring of 1608, Robinsoji, in company w^ith Brewster, 
Bradford, Carver, Wilson, and other leading men, accom- 
panied by their families, met at night on a lonely heath 
in Lincolnshire, intending to escape during the night. 
They had secretly hired a vessel for that purpose, and 
at the appointed time it appeared in the offing. The 
work of embarkation commenced, although the wind was 
high and the sea rough. Only a portion of the fugitives 
succeeded in getting on board before the remainder were 
surprised by a troop of horse, were arrested, and again 
conveyed to prison. But these, after the lapse of some 
time, were released, and eventually joined their friends, 
who had arrived in Holland and obtained a home and 
protection in Amsterdam. 

In that city a society still existed which traced its 
origin to Robert Brown. The associates of Robinson 

p 



226 



CONGREGATIONALISTS. 



anited with it, and at first all went on harmoniously. 
But dissensions soon afterward broke out among them, 
and Eobinson's friends removed to Ley den. Here they 
remained ten years. Some of these had oeen men of 
wealth, but they were at that time so impoverished, by 
not receiving their means from England, that they were 
reduced to the utmost indigence, and were compelled 
to learn mechanical trades. Brewster became a printer, 
and Bradford a silk dyer. During the period of their 
residence at Leyden these Congregationalists were ex- 
empted from persecution, and Robinson published several 
works, in which he set forth and defended the following 
points as constituting his belief : 

1. That no church ought to consist of more numbers 
than can conveniently meet together for worship and dis- 
cipline. 2. That the churches of Christ are to consist 
of those who believe in and obey Him. 3. That any 
competent number of such have the right, when con- 
ecience obliges them, to form themselves into a distinct 
and separate church. 4. That this incorporation must 
be effected by means of some contract or covenant, either 
expressed or implied. 6. That when thus incorporated 
they have full power and authority to choose their own 
officers. 6. That these officers should consist of pastors, 
or teaching elders, ruling elders, and deacons. 7. That 
the elders, though chosen and ordained, have no power 
to rule over the church, except by the consent of the 
brethren. 8. That all elders and churches are perfectly 
equal in their powers and privileges. 9. That baptism 
is to be administered to believers and their infant chil- 
dren. That the Lord's Supper is to be received sitting 
at the table, and is to be taken every Lord's Day. 
That ecclesiastical censures and penalties should be wholly 
spiritual, and not attended with temporal punishments. 



CONGREGATIONALISTS. 



227 



10. That no holy days were to be observed, except the 
Sabbath, though occasional days of fasting and thanks- 
giving were to be recommended. 

It was in 1617 that Robinson conceived the idea of 
removing to America. The tone of morals then preva- 
lent in Holland was very corrupt, and the Puritans were 
fearful that their children might be contaminated by the 
surrounding influences. The New World was then an al- 
most unknown wild, but perfect freedom and purity were 
the boons which tempted the adventurers to undertake the 
perilous voyage. They first selected Virginia as the spot 
to which their course should be directed. A committee 
was appointed to confer with the then existing Virginia 
Company, for the purpose of securing liberty and religious 
toleration within the limits of their jurisdiction. Although 
the company were sensible that the Puritans would be 
valuable colonists, and desired them to reside on their 
territory, they could not promise them absolute security, 
nor would the prelates of the Anglican Church promise 
them immunity from ecclesiastical interference, or perfect 
religious toleration. At length, however, the archbishop 
of London promised ^' to connive^' at their presence and 
religious views in Virginia, and they resolved to set 
sail. In 1620 the preparations for their departure were 
completed. As their vessels could not convey all the 
members of the community, they were divided, and a 
portion of them embarked on board the Mayflower^ while 
the remainder waited for the return of the vessel, to con- 
vey them on the second voyage. The emigrants were 
placed under the direction of Elder Brewster, while 
Robinson remained with the other party. 

It was at Delft Haven that Robinson bestowed hig 
blessing upon about a hundred persons previous to their 
embarkation, who constituted this extraordinary expedi- 



228 



CO NGREGATIONA LISTS. 



tion. He died in 1625; before he and his associates could 
accomplish their intended voyage to America, Subse- 
quently a few of them sailed for America, though the 
majority remained in Holland. The Mayflower reached 
Plymouth in safety, and the intrepid exiles disembarked 
upon a f^onntry which they were destined to render illus- 
trious by their own virtues and those of their descend- 
auts. The second Congregational church established in 
the New World was that founded at Salem, on August 
6, 1629. In 1630 another church was organized at 
Charlestown. On the 30th of July, in that year, the 
governor, deputy governor, and the minister, Mr. Wilson, 
entered into a "church covenant." Several days after- 
ward, five others joined them. At a later period other 
accessions were made to the society, and they then elected 
Mr. Wilson as their pastor, and ordained him to that 
office. Emigrants continued to arrive from England 
who sympathized with the Congregationalists in their 
opinions, and thus churches continued to be gradually 
organized around the original settlers of Plymouth. In 
1633, Mr. Cotton arrived from England, by whose means 
the scriptural plan of church government was developed, 
and generally adopted, which then received the name, and 
embodied the principles, of Congregationalism. In this 
the fellowship of the churches was first fully developed. 
In 1638 the Congregationalists resolved to become inde- 
pendent of the mother country in regard to the supply 
of ministers for their growing churches, and accordingly, 
in that year, they established Harvard College at Cam- 
bridge, which is the oldest literary institution in the 
United States. 

The Congregationalist churches gradually extended over 
the New England colonies. In 1648 a synod was held, at 
which a system of church order was adopted which has 



CONGREGATIONALI^TS. 



229 



since become widely known as the Cawibridge Platform. 
It was in 1680 that a confession or >creed which had 
been previously adopted by the English Congregational 
Churches was examined and approved by a synod as- 
sembled at Boston, and thus became the authoritative 
doctrinal declaration of the New England Congregation- 
alists. It is held by these Congregationalists that there 
is no "Congregational Church^' in this or in any country, 
in the sense in which the word "church" is applied to 
.other sects, such as the Presbyterian Church, or Metho- 
dist Church. But there is a collection of Congregational 
churches in fellowship with each other who constitute 
the denomination. The Congregationalists define a church 
to be an organization of professed believers statedly meet- 
ing in one place, and united together by a covenant or 
agreement mutually to watch over and edify each other, 
and for the maintefiance of the ordinances of the Gospel. 
A church, as thus understood, differs from a congregation, 
which includes all those who assemble in a place of wor- 
ship, non-communicants as well as communicants. A 
church also differs from a "'society," which is a legal 
phrase intended to represent those persons who are in- 
corporated by the law of the land for the purpose of 
holding and transferring property, and providing for the 
expenses of the church. The church also differs from the 
" parish," which last is a term properly employed only to 
designate territorial limits. 

Congregationalists insist upon the competence of each 
church to elect its own officers, to regulate its own affairs, to 
receive or reject candidates for membership, to pronounce 
censure upon any member who is guilty of impropriety, 
and that its allegiance in all these matters is due to Christ 
alone. In the administration of church affairs all the 
members have equal rights. Each male member of full 

20 



230 



CONGREGATION ALISTS. 



age is entitled to vote on all questions appertaining to the 
interests of the society. The internal structure of Con- 
gregational societies is of the simplest nature. Their only 
officers are pastors and deacons, for the office of ruling 
elder was disused about the year 1745, first at Plymouth^ 
and afterward in all the churches. The deacons are elected 
from and by the church members. The pastors are chosen 
by the members of the church from among those persons 
who are either already in the ministry, and settled over 
other churches, or are recommended by well-known clergy- 
men as fit to assume the functions of the pastoral office. 
In electing a pastor, it is usual for the " church" to nomi- 
nate a person to the " society," and, upon the concurrence 
of the latter, to give an invitation to the candidate to 
settle. Provision for the support of the pastor is made, 
either by a voluntary subscription, or a tax, or from the 
pew rents. When a pastor who is selected accepts the 
congregation tendered him, he is inducted into office by 
a council of ministers, being ordained by them if he has 
never before been set apart to the ministry ; if otherwise, 
simply installed. Each church selects a clerk, who keeps 
their records, (and in some churches a committee appointed 
by the members examines candidates for admission, in con- 
nection with the pastors and deacons, and has a general 
superintendence over the interests of the church.) The 
pastor is the moderator of the church, the spiritual coun- 
sellor of its members, their authorized teacher, and has 
full control over the pulpit, administers the ordinances 
of baptism and the Lord's Supper, and performs the 
marriage ceremony. The deacons distribute the alms of 
the church, visit the sick and needy, and are the counsel- 
lors of the minister whenever he desires the benefit of 
their advice. 

Congregational ists believe in the parity of the ministry, 



CONGREGATIONALIST 



231 



and hold that there is but one order of ministers. The 
deacons they regard as belonging to the laity. Licentiates 
are not ministers, but merely candidates for the sacred 
office. Those ministers who are employed to preach to 
churches from one year to another, without being installed, 
are termed stated supplies. The terms bishop and elder 
are not often used by Congregationalists, but when they 
are employed, they are intended merely to represent the 
pastors. Excommunication is enforced as the penalty 
upon those who make themselves amenable to church 
discipline by irregularities of conduct. 

The liturgy and form of worship of Congregationalists 
are simple. The ordinary service of the Sabbath consists 
of extemporaneous prayers, the singmg of psalms and 
hymns, the reading of the Scriptures, and the delivery 
of a sermon either written or unwritten. Although they 
are careful to preserve their congregational independence, 
yet they endeavor to promote sympathy and unity of aims 
between their churches. Hence the pastors of neighbor- 
ing churches frequently exchange pulpits, and meet in 
deliberative consociations, in which, though they have no 
legislative or judicial power or authority, they consult to- 
gether, and suggest ways and means of mutual usefulness. 
The fellowship of the churches is also expressed in council 
for the ordination or dismission of pastors, or for advice 
on questions of doctrine or practice. Such councils are 
commonly composed of the nearest churches, but if occa- 
sion calls for it, distant churches can be invited. Councils 
vary in size, being generally local, but on special occasion's 
national, If a member of the church supposes himself 
aggrieved by church action, he has the r-ght to request 
the church to summon a council of the pastors and dea- 
cons of neighboring churches, to examine into the facts 
?f his case and recommend such action as may seem to 



232 



CONGREGATION ALISTS. 



ihem just. If they refuse, lie has a right to call an ex 
parte council to give information and advice. In the 
Congregational system, the individual church is the source 
of all ecclesiastical authority ; hence the action of councils 
is advisory, and cannot interfere with the free and absolute 
determination of the aggregate members of any church in 
reference to the control or decision of their own affairs. 

The doctrines held by the Orthodox Congregationalists 
are the same in substance as those taught in the Confession 
of the Westminster Assembly of Divines which convened 
in 1643. They are Calvinistic, believing in absolute de- 
crees in reference to man's salvation. They are Psedo- 
baptists, holding to the right of infants to be baptized. 
They believe in man's total depravity by nature ; in the 
trinity, atonement, regeneration, justification by faith, and 
in the eternity of future punishment for the finally im- 
penitent. In 1750, Unitarian sentiments began to be dif- 
fused among the Congregationalists of New England. A 
public separation of such churches as espoused this system 
took place about the year 1815, but Unitarian churches 
everywhere still retain the Congregational form of church 
government. Harvard College is under their control, 
from the divinity school of which their candidates for the 
ministry are sent forth. But these churches are entirely 
distinct from the Orthodox Congregational churches, from 
which they originally sprung, and resemble them only in 
the form of their ecclesiastical government. Among the 
most eminent men whose names adorn the annals of Or- 
tliodox Congregationalism are those of Jonathan Edwards, 
Timothy D wight, S. Hopkins and Joseph Bellamy. The 
denomination co-operates efficiently with all the benevolent 
enterprises of the American Church, such as the Ameri- 
can Bible Society, American Tract Society, etc. The de- 
nomination occupies a very prominent and eminent place 



CONGREGATIONALISTS. 



233 



for numbers, usefulness and influence among the various 
branches of the American Church. The Baptist churches 
are organized on Congregational principles (see p. 37). 

Since 1863 the support of the American Home Mission- 
ary Society and the American Education Society, and since 
1870 the maintenance of the missions of the American 
Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, have come 
wholly upon the Congregationalists. The American Mis- 
sionary Association had depended upon them for several 
years previously, and they have also every year raised 
large sums for Church extension and for the College 
Society, as well as for their own Publication Society. It 
is greatly to their honor that these benevolent organiza- 
tions, the largest of their kind in the United States, have 
not been suffered to fall ofP in their receipts, and that a 
denomination ranking only sixth or seventh in numbers 
should be first in the amount of its contributions for 
purposes of evangelization, contributing to these objects 
$1,500,000 annually. 

The statistics of the Congregational churches for Janu- 
ary, 1874, were : 32 conventions, conferences or general 
associations, 3325 churches, 3238 ordained ministers, 
323,679 communicants ; or, adding the churches in Brit- 
ish America, 3431 churches, 3327 ministers, 330,130 
members. The number of ministers does not include 239 
licentiates. They have 7 theological seminaries, with 37 
professors and nearly 400 students ; 22 colleges, with 
nearly 6000 students, besides 8 colleges for women, with 
about 2500 pupils, and 18 other endowed academies. They 
have 17 periodicals under their exclusive control, besides 
four or five others of large circulation which profess to 
advocate their principles in general. 

20* 



234 



THE MORMONS 



THE MORMONS. 

The Mormons, or Latter Day Saints, are a denomi- 
nation of recent origin, having been founded by Jo- 
seph Smith within the present century. This remark- 
able man was born at Sharon, Windham County, 
Vermont, on the 23d of December, 1805. His father 
was a small farmer; and the first ten years of the life 
of the future prophet were spent at the place of his 
birth. In 1815 his parents removed to Palmyra, in 
the State of ISTew York ; and after a period of foui 
years they again changed their abode to Manchester, 
in the same State. During this interval Joseph was 
employed in the Various labors of agriculture ; and his 
opportunities for literary culture were very limited. 
It was with difficulty that he could read, or write, or 
perform the simplest processes of arithmetic. 

It was w^hen he was about fifteen years of age that 
Smith seems to have received his first religious impres- 
sions. He professes to have then examined into the 
claims of the various existing denominations, and to 
have discovered such confusion and contradiction 
among them, that he turned from all of them in dis- 
gust. Then it was that he determined to put in prac- 
tice the advice of St. James : " If any man lack wis- 
dom, let him ask of God, who giveth to all men 
liberally and upbraideth not, and it shall be given 
him." Accordingly he retired to a secret place in a 
grove, and began to call upon the Lord. He declares 
that he was then favored with a heavenly vision ; that 



THE MORMONS. 



235 



he saw two glorious personages, who resembled each 
other in form and feature, and were surrounded by a 
light brighter than that of the sun ; that they informed 
him that all the existing sects were in error, and had 
wandered from the truth ; and that they promised to 
reveal to him, at some future day, the Gospel of Truth 
in all its fulness, which he should afterward proclaim 
with great success throughout the world. He was also 
assured that he w^as the chosen instrument in intro- 
ducing this new dispensation ; and he was furnished 
with mysterious information in reference to the Abori- 
ginal inhabitants of this country. 

Smith alleged that the promise of a second vision 
was fulfilled in September, 1823 ; and that while pray- 
ing, a personage appeared to him Vv-ho proclaimed him- 
self the angel and messenger of God, and informed 
Smith where there were deposited a number of golden 
plates, upon which were written the records of the 
early inhabitants of this country, and which narrated 
how our Saviour, after his resurrection, made his ap- 
pearance on this continent, and established here his 
true religion, with the various orders of priests, pro- 
phets, and teachers ; how the people were all cut off in 
consequence of their sins, and the last of their prophets 
had been commanded to write on those plates a narra- 
tive of those events, and bury them, that they might 
afterward be found, and used in the latter days for the 
establishment and universal diffusion of the true reli» 
gion in the chosen time. 

These plates Smith alleged that he afterward ob- 
tained, and that they contain the volume known as the 
"Book of Mormon." A very different account of the 
origin of this remarkable production is given by another 
person, whose testimony is regarded by many as un- 



236 THE MORMONS. 

biased and true. "It is asserted that tlie Book of Mor- 
mon is a religious romance, which was written by a per- 
son named Solomon Spaulding. He was a graduate 
of Dartmouth College, and became a clergyman, but 
afterward relinquished his profession, and entered into 
mercantile pursuits. He subsequently removed to 
Ohio ; there he wrote this book, and in 1812 brought 
the manuscript to Pittsburg, and offered it to a pub- 
lisher named Pattersoo. Before any arrangement was 
made in reference to the matter, Spaulding died. The 
manuscript remained with Patterson till his death in 
1826, when it passed into the possession of Sidney Rig- 
don, by whose means it came into the hands of Joseph 
Smith. Then it was that Smith conceived the idea of 
founding a new religion based upon the romantic and 
curious details contained in this volume, in reference 
to the early history of the Lost Tribes of Israel, 
who are represented as being the ancestors of the 
American Aborigioes, and other details. The identity 
of Spaulding's book with the Book of Mormon was 
supported by the affidavits of several persons of uii- 
doubted veracity, who had seen the manuscript of 
, Spaulding, and afterward examined the Book of Mc r- 
mon. 

In whatever way Smith obtained possession of tLe 
Book of Mormon, it answered his purpose admirably 
as a means to aid in founding a new sect, upon the 
accomplishment of which purpose he had resolved. 
He proceeded to announce his divine mission as the 
chosen apostle of a new dispensation, to his immediate 
family and relations. His pretensions were at first 
received with derision and contempt ; and some time 
elapsed before any of his own family even pretended 
to believe in bis claims. But his earnestness and zea^ 



THE MORMONS. 



237 



prevailed, after a time; and first one and then another 
of his partizans announced themselves as converts. The 
first church of the Latter Day Saints was organized in 
the town of Manchester, in ISTew York, on the 6th of 
April, 1830 ; and from that time there commenced 
one of the most extraordinary histories ever presented 
in the annals of religion. The new sect were imme- 
diately visited by persecution, and the indignation of 
the public, at what they regarded as an unparalleled 
instance of mingled impudence and fraud, broke forth. 
Notwithstanding these obstacles, Smith continued to 
preach zealously, and to gather around him a number 
of adherents. 

At length the Mormon leaders became convinced 
that it was for tlie benefit of their cause for them to 
remove to a distant locality ; and accordingly Smith 
and his adherents, of whom Sidney Eigdon was the 
chief, proceeded westvv^ard, and established themselves, 
after various wanderings, in Jackson County, Mis- 
souri. Here they remained during four years, when 
the persecutions of their incensed neighbors compelled 
them to remove. Smith now selected a spot in Illi- 
nois which he called IsTauvoo, or the New Jerusalem — • 
the future home of the saints. Here his followers, 
who now numbered several thousand, commenced in 
April, 1841, to erect dwellings, public edifices, and a 
temple of large and imposing dimensions. In two 
years' time a num.erous community assembled there, a 
city gradually arose ; many missionaries were sent 
forth to proclaim the new faith; journals were esta- 
blished ; and the Mormon community attained a de- 
gree of prosperity which justly excited the astonish- 
ment, while it provoked the hostility and resentment, 
of the general public. 



238 



THE MORMONS. 



At that period E'auvoo contained fifteen thousand 
inhabitants. But success rendered them quarrelsome, 
and hostile factions arose among themselves. A party 
opposed to Smith commenced a suit against him for 
the alleged destruction of a p.rinting press ; but the 
warrant could not be served upon the prophet in 
iSTauvoo. He accordingly proceeded to the neighbor- 
ing town of Carthage to surrender himself on the war- 
rant; but the popular excitement had become so 
intense, that on the 27th of June, 1844, the jail was 
surrounded by a furious mob, who overpowered the 
guard, and eventually shot Smith, and several of his 
associates. 

After two years of conflict with the citizens of Illinois, 
the Mormons under Brigbam Young, Smith's successor, 
and greatly his superior intellectually, emigrated to Utah, 
about 4000 reaching there in 1847, and others subse- 
quently. There they have built up a community on a new 
plan, and by the skilful management of Young have in- 
creased greatly in numbers and wealth. They have repeat- 
edly come in collision with the U. S. Government on 
account of their polygamy and other offences, but still 
maintain their position. There are about 65,000 Mormons 
in Utah, though a part deny Young's authority. There is 
a body of seceders, led by Joseph Smith, Jr., in N. Iowa 
and Dakota, and about 7000 other Mormons in the U. S. 
They have missionaries in foreign countries, and perhaps 
50,000 adherents abroad. 

The following are their principal doctrines: They call 
the Bible the word of God, but they also hold that the 
Book of Mormon is inspired and possesses equal author- 
ity. Their notions of God and of Christ are crude and 
absurd, a mingling of Hindoo superstition with the Scrip- 
tures. They hold that the Gospel ordinances are four — 



PURITANS. 



239 



faith in Christ, repentance, baptism by immersion, and lay- 
ing on of hands, for the gift of the Holy Ghost. They 
believe in the power of miracles, of healing, prophecy, reve- 
lation, gift of tongues and visions among the saints at the 
present time. They believe in the literal gathering of 
Israel, the restoration of the Lost Ten Tribes, and the 
personal reign of Christ on the earth during a thousand 
years of millenial glory, when the saints will reign with 
him, and judge the Gentiles and unbelievers. They 
practice polygamy, and the spiritual wife system ; that 
is, every wife, except the first, is sealed to her husband, 
in order thereby to obtain salvation, inasmuch as none 
but the saints and their families will become partakers* 
of heaven and the millenial glory. 



PURITANS. 

The name Puritans was given in the primitive Church 
to the Novatians, because they would never admit to com- 
munion any one who, from dread of death, had apostatized 
from the faith ; but the word has been chiefly applied to 
those who were professed favorers of a further degree of 
reformation and purity in the Church before the Act of 
Uniformity, in 1662. After this period, the term l^on- 
conformists became common, to which succeeds the ap 
pellation Dissenter. 

"During the reign of Queen Elizabeth, in which the 
royal prerogative was carried to its utmost limits, there 
were found many daring spirits v/ho questioned the right 
of the sovereign to prescribe and dictate to her subjects 
what principles of religion they should profess, and what 
forms they ought to adhere to. The ornamenta and habits 



240 



PURITANS. 



worn by the clergy in the preceding reign, when the 
Romish religion and rites were triumphant, Elizabeth was 
desirous of preserving in the Protestant service. This 
was the cause of great discontent among a large body of 
her subjects : multitudes refused to attend at those churches 
where the habits and ceremonies were used ; the conform- 
ing clergy they treated with contumely; and, from the 
superior purity and simplicity of the modes of worship to 
which they adhered, they obtained the name of Puritans. 
The Queen made many attempts to repress everything that 
appeared to her as an innovation in the religion established 
by her authority, but without success ; by her almost un- 
limited authority she readily checked open and avowed 
opposition, but she could not extinguish the principles of 
the Puritans, 'by whom alone,' according to Mr. Hume, 
* the precious spark of liberty had been kindled and was 
preserved, and to whom the English owe the whole freedom 
of their constitution.' Some secret attempts that had 
been made by them to establish a separate congregation 
and discipline, had been carefully repressed by the strict 
hand which Elizabeth held over all her subjects. The 
most, therefore, that they could effect was to assemble in 
private houses for the purpose of worshipping God accord- 
ing to the dictates of their own consciences. These prac- 
tices were at first connived at, but afterwards every means 
was taken to suppress them, and the most cruel methods 
were made use of to discover persons who were disobedient 
to the royal pleasure. 

The severe persecutions carried on against the Puritans 
during the reigns of Elizabeth and the Stuarts, served to 
lay the foundation of a new empire in the western world. 
Thither, as into a wilderness, they fled from the face of 
their persecutors, and, being protected in the free exercise 
uf their religion, -continued to increase, till in about a cen 



PURITANS. 



241 



tury and a half thej became an independent nation. The 
different principles, howeverj on which thej originally 
divided from the Church establishment at home, operated 
in a way that might have been expected when they came 
to the possession of the civil power abroad. Those who 
formed the colony of Massachusetts Bay, having nevei 
relinquished the principles of a national Church, and of 
the power of the civil magistrate in matters of faith and 
worship, were less tolerant than those who settled at New 
Plymouth, at Rhode Island, and at Providence Plantations. 
The very men (and they were good men too) who had just 
escaped the persecutions of the English prelates, now in 
their turn persecuted others who dissented from them, till 
at length the liberal system of toleration established in 
the parent country at the Revolution, extending to the 
colonies, in a good measure put an end to these pro- 
ceedings. 

Neither the Puritans, before the passing of the Bartho- 
lomew act, in 1662, nor the Nonconformists, after it, ap- 
pear to have disapproved of the articles of the established 
Church in matters of doctrine. The number of those who 
did so, however, was very small. While the great body 
of the bishops and clergy had, from the days of Archbishop 
Laud, abandoned their own articles in favor of Arminian- 
ism, they were attached to the principles of the first Re- 
formers ; and by their labors and sufferings the spirit of 
the Reformation was kept alive in the land. But after 
the Revolution, one part of the Protestant Dissenters, 
chiefly Presbyterians, first veered towards Arminianism. 
then revived the Arian controversy, and by degrees many 
of them settled in Socinianism. At the same time another 
part of them, chiefly Independents and Baptists, earnestly 
contending for the doctrines of grace, and conceiving, as 
it would seem, that the danger of erring lay entirely on 
21 Q 



242 



BROWNISTS. 



one side, first veered towards high Calvinism ; then forbore 
inviting the unregenerate to repent, believe, or do any- 
thing practically good, and by degrees many of them, it 
is said, settled in Antinomianism. 

Such are the principles which have found place amongst 
the descendants of the Puritans. At the same time, how- 
ever, it must be acknowledged that a goodly number of 
each of the three denominations have adhered to the doc- 
trine and spirit of their forefathers ; and have proved the 
efficacy of their principles by their concern to be holy in 
all manner of conversation. See articles Brownists, 
Independents, and Nonconformists, in this work. 



BROWNISTS, 

A sect that arose among the Puritans towards the close 
of the sixteenth century ; so named from their leader, Ro- 
bert Brown. He was educated at Cambridge, and was a 
man of good parts and some learning. He began to inveigh 
openly against the ceremonies of the church, at Norwich, 
in 1580 : but being much opposed by the bishops, he, with 
his congregation, left England, and settled at Middleburgh, 
in Zealand, where they obtained leave to worship God in 
their own way, and form a church according to their own 
model. They soon, however, began to differ among them- 
selves ; so that Brown, growing weary of his office, re- 
turned to England, in 1589, renounced his principles of 
separation, and was preferred to the rectory of a church in 
Northamptonshire. He died in prison in 1630. The revolt 
of Brown was attended with the dissolution of the church 
a-t Middleburgh ; but the seeds of Brownism which he had 



BROWNISTS. 



243 



Bown in England were so far from being destroyed, that 
Sir Walter Raleigh, in a speech in 1592, computes no less 
than 20,000 of this s.ect. 

The articles of their faith seem to be nearly the same as 
those of the church of England. The occasion of their 
separation was not, therefore, any fault they found with the 
faith, but only with the discipline and form of government 
of the churches in Engla.id. They equally charged cor- 
ruption on the Episcopal and Presbyterian forms ; nor 
would they join with any other reformed church, because 
they were not assured of the sanctity and regeneration of 
the members that composed it. They condemned the solemn 
celebration of marriages in the church, maintaining that 
matrimony being a political contract, the confirmation 
thereof ought to come from the civil magistrate ; an opin- 
ion in which they are not singular. They would not allow 
the children of such as were not members of the church to 
be baptized. They rejected all forms of prayer, and held 
that the Lord's prayer was not to be recited as a prayer, 
being only given for a rule or model whereon all our pray- 
ers are to be formed. Their form of church government 
was nearly as follows ; When a church was to be gathered, 
such as desired to be members of it made a confession of 
their faith in the presence of each other, and signed a cove- 
nant, by which they obliged themselves to walk together in 
the order of the Gospel. The whole power of admitting 
and excluding members, with the decision of all controvev- 
Bies, was lodged in the brotherhood. Their church officers 
were chosen from among themselves, and separated to their 
tjeveral offices by fasting, prayer, and imposition of hands. 
But they did not allow the priesthood to be any distinct 
order. As the vote of the brethren made a man a minister, 
so the same power could discharge him from his office, and 
redaee him to a mere layman again ; and as they mam 



244 



BROWNISTS. 



tained the bounds of a churcli to be no greater than what 
could meet together in one place, and join in one commu- 
Dion, so the power of these officers was prescribed within 
the same limits. The minister of one church could not 
administer the Lord's Supper to another, nor baptize the 
children of any but those of his own society. Any lay 
brother was allowed the liberty of giving a word of exhor- 
tation to the people ; and it was usual for some of them 
after sermon to ask questions, and reason upon the doc- 
trines that had been preached. In a word, every church 
on their model is a body corporate, having full power to 
do everything in themselves, without being accountable to 
any class, synod, convocation, or other jurisdiction what- 
ever. The reader will judge how near the Independent 
churches are allied to this form of government. See Inde- 
pendents. The laws were executed with great severity on 
the Brownists ; their books were prohibited by queen Eli- 
zabeth, their persons imprisoned, and some hanged. Brown 
himself declared on his death-bed that he had been in thirty- 
two different prisons, in some of which he could not see his 
hand at noon-day. They were so much persecuted, that 
they resolved at last to quit the country. Accordingly, 
many retired and settled at Amsterdam, where they formed 
a church, and chose Mr. Johnson their pastor, and after 
him, Mr. Ainsworth, author of the learned Commentary on 
the Pentateuch. Their church flourished near 100 years. 
Among the Brownists, too, were the famous John Kobin- 
Bon, a part of whose congregation from Leyden, in Holland, 
made the first permanent settlement in North America ; 
and the laborious Canne, the author of the marginal refer* 
ences to the Bible. 



INDEPENDENTS. 



245 



THE INDEPENDENTS 

A.RE a sect of Protestants, so called from their maintaining 
that each congregation of Christians which meet in one 
house for public worship is a complete church ; has suffi- 
cient power to act and perform everything relating to reli- 
gious government within itself ; and is in no respect subject 
or accountable to other churches. 

Though the Episcopalians contend that there is not a 
shadow of the independent discipline to be found either in 
the Bible or the primitive church, the Independents, on the 
contrary, believe that it is most clearly to be deduced from 
the practice of the apostles in planting the first churches 
The Independents, however, were not distinguished as a 
body till the time of queen Elizabeth. The hierarchy esta- 
blished by that princess in the churches of her dominions, 
the vestments worn by the clergy in the celebration of 
divine worship, the book of Common Prayer, and, above 
all, the sign of the cross used in the administration of bap- 
tism, were very offensive to many of her subjects, who, 
during the persecutions of the former reign, had taken 
refuge among the Protestants of Germany and Geneva. 
These men thought that the church of England resembled 
in too many particulars tlie anti-christian church of Rome; 
they therefore called perpetually for a more thorough re- 
formation, and a 'purer worship. From this circumstance 
they were stigmatized with the general name of Puritans, 
as the followers of Novatian had been in the ancient church 
Elizabeth was not disposed to comply with their demands 
and it is difficult to say what might have been the issue of 
the contest, had the Puritans been united among them 

21* 



246 



INDEPENDENTS. 



selves in sentiments, views, and measures. But tlie case 
was quite otherwise : that large body, composed of persons 
of different ranks, character, opinions, and intentions, and 
unanimous in nothing but their antipathy to the Esta- 
blished Church, was all of a sudden divided into a variety of 
sects. Of these the most famous was that which was formed 
about the year 1581, by Robert Brown, a man insinuating 
in his manners, but unsteady and inconsistent in his vie\TS 
and actions of men and things. Brown was for dividi'iig 
the whole body of the faithful into separate societies or 
congregations ; and maintained that such a number of per- 
sons as could be contained in an ordinary place of worship 
ought to be considered as a church, and enjoy all the rights 
and privileges that are competent to an ecclesiastical com- 
munity. These small societies he pronounced independent, 
jure divino, and entirely exempt from the jurisdiction of 
the bishop, in whose hands the court had placed the reins 
of a spiritual government : and also from that of presby 
teries and synods, which the Puritans regarded as the 
supreme visible sources of ecclesiastical authority. But as 
we have given an account of the general opinions and dis- 
cipline of the Brownists, we need not enumerate them here, 
but must beg the reader to refer to that article. The zeal 
with which Brown and his associates maintained and pro- 
pagated his notions, was, in a high degree, intemperate and 
extravagant. He affirmed that all communion was to be 
broken off with those religious societies that were founded 
upon a different plan from his ; and treated more especially 
thz church of England as a spurious church, whose minis- 
ters were unlawfully ordained ; whose discipline was popish 
and anti-cbristian ; and whose sacraments and institutions 
were destitute of all efficacy and virtue. His followers not 
being able to endure the severe treatment which they met 
with from an administration that was not distinguished for 



INDEPENDENTS. 



247 



its mildness and indulgence, retired into the Netherlands, 
md founded churches at Middlebourg, Amsterdam, and 
Leyden. Their founder, however, returned into England, 
renounced his principles of separation, and took orders in 
the Established Church. The Puritan exiles, whom he thus 
abandoned, disagreed among themselves, were split into 
parties, and their affairs declined from day to day. This 
engaged the wiser part of them to mitigate the severity 
of their founder's plan, and to soften the rigor of his un- 
charitable decisions. 

The person who had the chief merit of bringing about 
this reformation was one of their pastors, of the name of 
Robinson, a man who had much of the solemn piety of the 
times, and no inconsiderable portion of learning. This 
distinguished reformer, perceiving the defects that reigned 
m the discipline of Brown, and in the spirit and temper 
of his followers, employed his zeal and diligence in correct- 
ing them, and in new-modelling the society in such a man- 
ner, as to render it less odious to his adversaries, and less 
liable to the just censure of those true Christians who look 
upon charity as the end of the commandments. Hitherto 
the sect had been called Brownists ; but Robinson having 
in his apology affirmed that all Christian congregations 
were so many independent religious societies, that had a 
right to be governed by their own laws, independent of any 
further or foreign jurisdiction, the sect was first called 
Independents, afterv^ard Congregationalists, of which the 
apologist was considered as the founder. 

The first independent or congregational church in Eng- 
land was established by a Mr. Jacob, in the year 1616. 
Mr. Jacob, who had fled from the persecution of Bishop 
Bancroft, going to Holland, and having imparted his 
\lesign of setting up a separate congregation, like those in 
Holland, to the most learned Puritans of those times, it 



248 



INDEPENDENTS. 



was not condemned as unlawful, considering there was no 
prospect of a national reformation. Mr. Jacob, therefore, 
having summoned several of his friends together, and 
having obtained their consent to unite in church fellow- 
ship for enjoying the ordinances of Christ in the purest 
manner, they laid the foundation of the first independent 
church in England in the following way : Having observed 
a day of solemn fasting and prayer for a blessing upon 
their undertaking, towards the close of the solemnity, each 
of them made an open confession of their faith in Christ ; 
and then, standing together, they joined hands, and 
solemnly covenanted with each other, in the presence of 
Almighty God, to walk together in all God's way and 
ordinances, according as he had already revealed, or should 
further make known to them. Mr. Jacob was then chosen 
pastor by the suffrage of the brotherhood ; and others were 
appointed to the office of deacons, with fasting and prayer, 
and imposition of hands. 

The Independents were much more commendable than 
the Brownists ; they surpassed them, both in the modera- 
tion of their sentiments, and in the order of their discipline. 
They did not, like Brown, pour forth bitter and unchari- 
table invectives against the churches which were governed 
by rules entirely different from theirs, nor pronounce them, 
on that account, unworthy of the Christian name. On 
che contrary, though they considered their own form of 
ecclesiastical government as of Divine institution, and as 
originally introduced by the authority of the apostles, 
nay, by the apostles themselves, they had yet candor and 
charity enough to acknowledge that true religion and solid 
piety might flourish in those communities which were under 
the jurisdiction of bishops, or the government of synods 
and presbyteries. They were also much more attentive 
than the Brownists in keeping on foot a regular ministry 



INDEPENDENTS. 



249 



in their communities ; for, while the latter allowed promis 
cuously all ranks and orders of men to teach in public, 
%Q Independents had, and still have, a certain number of 
ministers, chosen respectively by the congregations where 
they are fixed : nor is it common for any person among 
them to speak in public before he has submitted to a 
proper examination of his capacity and talents, and been 
approved of by the heads of the congregation. 

From 1642, the Independents are very frequently men- 
tioned in the English annals. The charge alleged against 
them by Rapin, (in his History of England, vol ii- p. 114, 
folio edition,) that they could not so much as endure 
ordinary ministers in the church, &c., is grouLdless. He 
was led into this mistake by confounding the Independents 
with the Brownists. Other charges, no less unjustifiable, 
have been urged against the Independents by this cele- 
brated historian and others. Rapin says, that they ab- 
horred monarchy and approved of a republican govern- 
ment: this might have been true with regard to many 
persons among them, in common with other sects ; but it 
does not appear, from any of their public writings, that 
republican principles formed their distinguishing charac- 
teristic ; on the contrary, in a public memorial drawn up 
by them in 1647, they declare that they do not disapprove 
of any form of civil government, but do freely acknowledge 
that a kingly government, bounded by just and wholesome 
laws, is allowed by God, and also a good accommodation 
unto men. The Independents, however, have been gene- 
rally ranked among the regicides, and charged with the 
death of Charles I. Whether this fact be admitted or 
denied, no conclusion can be fairly drawn from the greater 
prevalence of republican principles, or from violent pro- 
ceedings at that period, that cs^n affect tl e distinguishing 
tenets and conduct of the Independents i i our times. It 



250 



INDEPENDENTS. 



is certam that the present Independents are steady friends 
to a limited monarchy. Rapin is further mistaken when he 
represents the religious principles of the English Indepen- 
dents as contrary to those of all the rest of the world. It 
appears from two confessions of faith, one composed by 
Robinson, in behalf of the English Independents in Hol- 
land, and published at Leyden, in 1619, entitled, Apologia 
pro Exulihus Anglis^ qui B^^ownistse vulgo appellantur ; 
and another drawn up in London, in 1658, by the princi- 
pal members of their community in England, entitled, "A 
Declaration of the Faith and Order owned and practised 
by the Congregational Churches in England, agreed upon 
and consented unto by their Elders and Messengers, in 
their meeting at the Savoy, October 12th, 1658," as well 
as from other writings of the Independents, that they 
differed from the rest of the reformed in no single point 
of any consequence, except that of ecclesiastical govern- 
ment ; and their religious doctrines were almost entirely 
the same with those adopted by the church of Geneva. 
During the administration of Cromwell, the Independents 
acquired very considerable reputation and influence ; and 
he made use of them as a check to the ambition of the 
Presbyterians, who aimed at a very high degree of e.ccle 
siastical power, and who had succeeded, soon after tho 
elevation of Cromwell, in obtaining a parliamentary estab- 
lishment of their own church government. But after the 
restoration, their' cause declined ; and in 1691 they entered 
into an association with the Presbyterians residing in and 
about London, comprised in nine articles, that tended to 
the maintenance of their respective institutions. These 
may be found in the second volume of "\Yhiston's Memoirs, 
and the substance of them in Mosheim. At this time the 
Independents and Presbyterians, called from this associa- 
tion the United Brethren, were agreed with regard to 



INDEPENDENTS. 



251 



doctrines, being generally Calvinisls, and differed only 
with respect to ecclesiastical discipline. Independentism 
is peculiar to Great Britain, the United States, and the 
Netherlands. It was carried first to the American colo- 
nies in 1620, and by successive Puritan emigrants, in 
1629 and 1633, from England, and there developed more 
fully the fellowship of the churches, and w^as called Con- 
gregationalism. One Morel, in the sixteenth century, 
endeavored to introduce it into France ; but it was con- 
demned at the synod of Eochelle, where Beza presided ; 
and again at the synod of Rochelle, in 1644. 

Many of the Independents reject the use of all creeds 
and confessions drawn up by fallible men, though they 
require of their teachers a declaration of their belief m 
the Gospel and its various doctrines, and their adherence 
to the Scriptures as the sole standard of faith and prac- 
tice. They attribute no virtue whatever to the right of 
ordination, upon which some other churches lay so much 
stress. According to them, the qualifications which con- 
stitute a regular minister of the New Testament, are, a 
firm belief in the Gospel, a principle of sincere and unaf- 
fected piety, a competent stock of knowledge, a capacity 
for leading devotion and communicating instruction, a 
serious inclination to engage in the important employment 
of promoting the everlasting salvation of mankind, and 
ordinarily an invitation to the pastoral office from some 
particular society of Christians. Where these things con- 
cur, they consider a person as fitted' and authorized for 
the discharge of every duty which belongs to the minis- 
terial function ; and they believe that the imposition of 
hands of bishops or presbyters would convey to him no 
powers or prerogatives of which he was not before pos- 
sessed. But though they attribute no virtue to ordination, 
as conveying any new powers, yet they hold with and 



252 



INDEPENDENTS. 



practise it. Many of them, indeed, suppose that the 
essence of ordination does not lie in the act of the minis- 
ters who assist, but in the choice and call of the people, 
and the candidate's acceptance of that call ; so that their 
ordination may be considered only as a public declaration 
of that agreement. They consider it as their right to 
choose their own ministers and deacons. They own no 
man as head of the church. They disallow of parochial 
and provincial subordination ; but though they do not 
think it necessary to assemble synods, yet, if any be held, 
they look upon their resolutions as prudential counsels, 
but not as decisions to which they are obliged to conform. 
They consider the Scriptures as the only criterion of 
truth. Their worship is conducted in a decent, plain, and 
simple manner, without the ostentation of form, and the 
vain pomp of ceremony. 

The congregations of the Independents are very nume- 
rous in Great Britain and Ireland, and generally very 
respectable. This denomination has produced many cha- 
racters as eminent for learning and piety as any Church in 
Christendom, whose works, no doubt, will reflect lasting 
honor on their character and abilities. In the United 
States the Congregationalists are the representatives of the 
Independent churches of Great Britain. 



NEONOMIAN& 



.253 



NEONOMIANS. 

Neonomians, so called from tlie Greek vso?, neWy and 
/t^fjoo^, law, signifying new law, the condition whereof is im- 
perfect, though sincere and persevering obedience. 

Neonomianism seems to be an essential part of the Armi- 
nian system. " The new covenant of grace which, through 
the medium of Christ's death, the Father made with men, 
consists, according to this system, not in our being justi- 
fied by faith, as it apprehends the righteousness of Christ; 
but in this, that God, abrogating the exaction of perfect 
legal obedience, reputes or accepts of faith itself, and the 
imperfect obedience of faith, instead of the perfect obe- 
dience of the law, and graciously accounts them worthy of 
the reward of eternal life." This opinion was examined at 
the synod of Dort, and has been canvassed between the 
Calvinists and Arminians on various occasions. 

Towards the close of the seventeenth century, a contro- 
versy was agitated amongst the English Dissenters, in 
which the one side, who were partial to the writings of Dr. 
Crisp, were charged with Antinomianism, and the other, 
who favored Mr. Baxter, were accused of Neonomianism. 
Mr. Daniel Williams, who was a principal writer on what 
was called the Neonomian side, after many things had been 
said, gives the following as a summary of his faith in refe- 
rence to those subjects. — 1. God has eternally elected a 
certain definite number of men whom he will infallibly save 
by Christ in that way prescribed by the Gospel. 2. These 
very elect are not personally justified until they receive 
Christ, and yield up themselves to him, but they remain 
condemned whilst unconverted to Christ. 3. By the min- 
btry of the Gospel there is a serious ofier of pardon and 

22 



254 



N E N M I AN S. 



glorj, upon the terms of the Gospel, to all that hear it ; 
and God thereby requires them to comply with the said 
terms. 4. Ministers ought to use these and other Gospel 
benefits as motives, assuring men that if they believe they 
shall be justified ; if they turn to God, they shall live ; if 
they repent, their sins shall be blotted out ; and whilst they 
neglect these duties, they cannot have a personal interest 
in these respective benefits. 5. It is by the power of the 
Spirit of Christ freely exerted, and not by the power of 
free-will, that the Gospel becomes eiFectual for the conver- 
sion of any soul to the obedience of faith. 6. When a man 
believes, yet it is not that very faith, and much less any 
other work, the matter of that righteousness for which a 
sinner is justified, i. e., entitled to pardon, acceptance, and 
eternal glory, as righteous before God ; and it is the im- 
puted righteousness of Christ alone, for which the Gospel 
gives the believer a right to these and all saving blessings, 
who in this respect is justified by Christ's righteousness 
alone. By both this and the fifth head it appears that all 
boasting is excluded, and we are saved by free grace. 7. 
Faith alone receives the Lord Jesus and his righteousness, 
and the subject of this faith is a convinced, penitent soul ; 
hence we are justified by faith alone, and yet the impeni- 
tent are not forgiven. 8. God has freely promised that all 
whom he predestinated to salvation shall not only savingly 
believe, but that he by his power shall preserve them from 
d total or a final apostasy. 9. Yet the believer, whilst he 
lives in this world, is to pass the time of his sojourning 
here with fear, because his warfare is not accomplished, 
and that it is true that, if he draw back, God will have no 
pleasure in him. Which with the like cautions God blesseth 
as means to the saints' perseverance, and these by minis- 
ters should be so urged. 10. The law of innocence, or 
moral law, is so in force still, as that every precept there- 



NEONOMIANS, 



255 



of constitutes duty, even to the believer : every breacb 
thereof is a sin deserving of death : this law binds death 
by its curse on every unbeliever, and the righteousness for 
or by which we are justified before God, is a righteousness 
(at least) adequate to that law which is Christ's alone right- 
eousness ; and this so imputed to the believer as that God 
deals judicially with him according thereto. 11. Yet such 
is the grace of the Gospel, that it promiseth in and by 
Christ a freedom from the curse, forgiveness of sin, and 
eternal life, to every sincere believer ; which promise God 
will certainly perform, notwithstanding the threatening of 
the law." 

Dr. Williams maintains the conditionality of the cove- 
nant of grace ; but admits with Dr. Owen, who also uses the 
term condition, that " Christ undertook that those who were 
to be taken into this covenant should receive grace enabling 
them to comply with the terms of it, fulfil its conditions, 
and yield the obedience which God required therein." 

On this subject Dr. Williams further says, " The ques- 
tion is not whether the first (viz., regenerating) grace, by 
which we are enabled to perform the condition, be abso- 
lutely given. This I affirm, though that be dispensed ordi- 
narily in a due use of means, and in a way discountenancing 
idleness, and fit encouragement given to the use of means." 

The following objection, among others, was made by 
several ministers in 1692, against Dr. William's Gospel 
Truth Stated, &c. " To supply the room of the moral law, 
vacated by him, he turns the Gospel into a new law, in 
keeping of which we shall be justified for the sake of Christ's 
righteousness, making qualifications and acts of ours a dis- 
posing subordinate righteousness, whereby we become 
capable of being justified by Christ's righteousness." 

To this, among other things, he answers, " The difier- 
ence is not, 1. Whether the Gospel be a new law in the 



256 



NONCONrORMISTS. 



Socinian, Popisli, or Arminian sense. This I deny. ITor* 
2. Is faith, or any other grace or act of ours, any atone- 
ment for sin, satisfaction to justice, meriting qualification, 
or any part of that righteousness for which we are justified 
at God our Creator's bar. This I deny in places innume- 
rable. Nor, 3. Whether the Gospel be a law more ne-vv 
than is implied in the first promise to fallen Adam, pro- 
posed to Cain, and obeyed by Abel, to the difierencing him 
from his unbelieving brother. This I deny. 4. Nor whether 
the Gospel be a law that allows sin, when it accepts such 
graces as true, though short of perfection, to be the condi- 
tions of our personal interest in the benefits purchased by 
Christ. This I deny. 5. Nor whether the Gospel be a 
law, the promises whereof entitle the performers of its 
conditions to the benefits as of debt. This I deny. 

He goes on to say thit the real difference is, that the 
Gospel is a law, as commanding repentance, and promising 
pardon to obedience, and threatening punishment to dis- 
obedience. 



NONCONFOEMISTS. 

This sect is remarkable as having once included some 
of the ablest, most eloquent and pious clergymen in England. 
The Nonconformists were those who at certain periods re- 
fused to join the established church of England. Those in 
England may be considered of three parts: 1. Such as absent 
themselves from Divine worship in the established church 
through total irreligion, and attend the service of no other 
persuasion. 2. Such as absent themselves on the plea of 
conscience ; as Presbyterians, Independents, Baptists, etc. 
3. Internal Nonconformists^ or unprincipled clergymen, 



NONCONFORMISTS. 



257 



who applaud and propagate doctrines quite inconsistent 
with several of those articles they promised on oath to 
defend. The word is generally used in reference to those 
ministers who were ejected from their livings by the Act 
of Uniformity, in 1662. The number of these was about 
two thousand. However some affect to treat these men 
with indifference, and suppose that their consciences were 
more tender than they need be, it must be remembered 
that they were men of as extensive learning, great abili- 
ties, and pious conduct, as ever appeared. Mr. Locke, if 
his opinion have any weight, calls them ''worthy, learned, 
pious, orthodox divines, who did not throw themselves out 
of service, but were forcibly ejected." Mr. Bogue thus 
draws their character: '^As to their imhlic ministration^'* 
he says, "they were orthodox, experimental, serious, affec- 
tionate, regular, faithful, able, and popular preachers. As 
to their moral qualities, they were devout and holy ; faith- 
ful to Christ and the souls of men ; wise and prudent ; of 
great liberality and kindness ; and strenuous advocates for 
liberty, civil and religious. As to their intellectual quali- 
ties, they were learned, eminent, and laborious." These 
men were driven from their houses, from the society of 
their friends, and exposed to the greatest difficulties. 
Their burdens were greatly increased by the Conventicle 
Act, whereby they were prohibited from meeting for any 
exercise of religion (above five in number) in any other 
manner than allowed by the liturgy or practice of the 
Church of England. For the first offence the penalty was 
three months' imprisonment, or pay five pounds ; for the 
second offence, six months' imprisonment, or ten pounds ; 
and for the third offence, to be banished to some of the 
American plantations for seven years, or pay one hundred 
pounds ; and in case they returned, to suffer death without 
benefit of clergy. By virtue of this act, the jails were 

22* R 



258 



NONCONFORMISTS. 



/{nicklj filled with dissenting Protestants, and the trade 
of an informer was very gainful. So great was the seve- 
rity of these times, says Neale, that they were afraid to 
pray in their families, if above four of their acquaintance, 
who came only to visit them, were present. Some families 
/Scrupled asking a blessing on their moat, if five strangers 
were at table. 

But this was not all (to say nothing of the Test Act). 
In 1665, an act was brought into the House to banish 
them from their friends, commonly called the Oxford Five 
Mile Act, by which all dissenting ministers, on the penalty 
of forty pounds, who would not take an oath (that it was 
not lawful, upon any pretence whatever, to take arms 
against the king, etc.), were prohibited from coming within 
five miles of any city, town corporate, or borough, or any 
place where they had exercised their ministry, and from 
teaching any school. Some few took the oath ; others 
could not, and consequently suffered the penalty. 

In 1673, "the mouths of the high church pulpiteers 
were encouraged to open as loud as possible. One, in his 
sermon before the House of Commons, told them that the 
Nonconformists ought not to be tolerated, but to be cured 
by vengeance. He urged them to set fire to the faggot, 
and to teach them by scourges or scorpions, and open their 
eyes with gall." 

Such were the dreadful consequences of this intolerant 
spirit, that it is supposed near eight thousand died in pri 
son in the reign of Charles II. It is said that Mr. Jere- 
miah White had carefully collected a list of those who had 
suffered between Charles II. and the revolution, which 
amounted to sixty thousand. The same persecutions were 
carried on in Scotland ; and there, as well as in England, 
many, to avoid persecution, fled from their country. 

But, notwithstanding all these dreadful and furious at- 
tacks upon the Dissenters, they were not extirpated. Theif 



NONCONFORMISTS. 



259 



very persecution was in their favor. The infamous char 
acters of their informers and persecutors; their piety, 
zeal, and fortitude, no doubt, had influence on considerate 
minds ; and, indeed, they had additions from the esta« 
Wished church, which " several clergymen in this reign 
deserted as a persecuting church, and took their lot among 
them." In addition to this, King James suddenly altered 
his measures, granted a universal toleration, and preferred 
Dissenters to places of trust and profit, though it was evi- 
dently with a view to restore Popery. 

King William coming to the throne, the famous Tolera- 
tion Act passed, by which they were exempted from sufier- 
ing the penalties before mentioned, and permission given 
them to worship God according to the dictates of their 
own consciences. In the latter end of Queen Anne's 
reign, they began to be a little alarmed. An act of Par 
liament passed, called the Occasional Conformity Bill, 
which prevented any person, in office under the government 
entering into a meeting-house. Another, called the Schism 
Bill, had actually obtained the royal assent, which suffered 
no Dissenters to educate their own children, but required 
them to be put into the hands of Conformists ; and which 
forbade all tutors and schoolmasters being present at any 
conventicle, or dissenting place of worship ; but the very 
day this iniquitous act was to have taken effect, the Queen 
died (August 1, 1714). 

But George I., being fully satisfied that these hardships 
were brought upon the Dissenters for their steady adhe- 
rence to the Protestant succession in his illustrious house, 
against a Tory and Jacobite ministry who were paving the 
way for a Popish pretender, procured the repeal of them 
in the fifth year of his reign ; though a clause was left 
that forbade the mayor or other magistrate to go into any 
meeting for religious worship with the ensigns of his office. 



260 



HUGUENOTS. 



HUGUENOTS. 

This term, which was applied to the Protestants in 
France in contempt, is of uncertain origin. In public 
documents, they were styled Oeux de la religion pretendue 
reformee, or Religionnaires. 

The principles of Luther and Zwinglius had gained an 
entrance into France, during the reign of Francis 1. 
(1515-47). The doctrines of Calvin spread still more 
widely, although Francis endeavored to suppress them by 
prohibiting Calvinistic books, and by penal laws, and, in 
some instances, by capital punishments. 

Under Henry II., the successor of Francis, these doc- 
trines made greater progress, in proportion as they were 
more violently persecuted. The opinions and influence of 
Queen Margaret of Navarre had no small share in this 
extension, and the parties at court contributed much to 
the bloody persecution of the Protestants. One party 
wished to enrich themselves by the estates of the heretics, 
who were executed or banished, and the other to gain the 
favor of the people by their punishment. The parties of 
the Bourbons and of the five princes of Guise, under the 
government of the weak Francis II., made use of this re- 
ligious dispute, in order to advance their own political 
ends. 

The Bourbons belonged to the Protestant party ; and 
the Guises, in order to weaken, and, if possible, to destroy 
their rivals, continued the persecution of the heretics with 
fanatical fury. In every parliament there was a chamber 
established to examine and punish the Protestants, called 
by the people the burning chamher (cliamhre ardentt), 



HUGUENOTS. 



261 



because all convicted of heresy were burnt. The estates 
of those who fled were sold, and their children who re- 
mained behind were exposed to the greatest sufferings. 
But notwithstanding this persecution, the Protestants 
would not have thought of a rebellion, had not a prince of 
the blood encouraged them to it by the promise of his 
assistance. 

In 1560 the conspiracy began. The discontented in- 
quired of lawyers and theologians whether they could with 
a good conscience take arms against the Guises. The 
Protestant divines in Germany declared it proper to resist 
the tyranny of the Guises, if it were under the guidance 
and direction of a prince of the blood, and with the appro- 
bation of the majority in the States. 

The malcontents having consulted upon the choice of a 
leader, all voices decided in favor of the brave prince 
Louis of Conde, who had conducted the whole affair, and 
gladly seized the opportunity to make himself formidable 
by the support of the Huguenots. The name of the leader 
was, however kept secret, and a Protestant gentleman of 
Perigord, John du Barry, seigneur of Benaudie, was ap- 
pointed his deputy. 

It was determined that a number of the Calvinists 
should appear on an appointed day before the king at 
Blois, to present a petition for the free exercise of their 
religion ; and, in case this request was denied, as it was 
foreseen it would be, a chosen band of armed Protestants 
were to make themselves masters of the city of Blois, 
seize the Guises, and compel the king to name the Prince 
of Conde regent of the realm. 

This plot was betrayed. The court left Blois, the mili- 
tary were summoned, and the greatest part of the Protest- 
ants who had armed themselves to carry the conspiracy 
into effect, were executed or imprisoned. Few of thosie 



262 HUGUENOTS. 

who fell into the power of the court found mercy ; and 
about 1200 expiated their offence with their lives. 

The Guises now desired to establish the inquisition, but 
the wise chancellor, Michael de I'llopital, in order to avoid 
the greater evil, advised that all inquiries into the crime 
of heresy should be committed to the bishops, and that 
parliament should be prohibited from exercising any juris- 
dictian in matters of faith ; and it was so ordered by the 
edict of Romorantin (1560). 

In the reign of the next king, Charles IX., during whose 
minority the Queen mother, Catharine de Medici, was at 
the head of the government, the contest between the par- 
ties became yet more violent, and their contending interests 
were more and more used for a pretence to accomplish 
unholy designs, and it was only from motives of policy 
that the free exercise of their religion was secured to the 
Protestants by the Queen, in order to preserve the balance 
between the parties, by the edict of January (1562), so 
called. The Protestants thereby gained new courage ; but 
their adversaries, dissatisfied with this ordinance, and re- 
gardless of decency, disturbed the Huguenots in their 
religious services. Bloody scenes were the result, and the 
massacre of Vassy (1562) was the immediate cause of the 
first civil war. 

These religious wars desolated France almost to the 
end of the sixteenth century, and were only interrupted 
by occasional truces. The suffering which these wars 
brought upon the people is to be ascribed to the instability 
and bad policy of Queen Catharine de Medici, who exerted 
the most decided influence, not only over the feeble 
Charles IX,, but likewise over the contemptible Henry III. 
She wished, in fact, for the extirpation of the Huguenots, 
and it was merely her intriguing policy which induced her, 
much to the vexation of the opposite party, to favor the 



HUaUENOTS. 



263 



Protestants from time to time, and to grant them freedom 
of conscience. Always wavering between tlie two parties, 
she flattered herself with the expectation of holding them 
m check during peace, or of destroying the one by the 
other in war. Both parties were, therefore, generally diis- 
satisfied with the court, and followed their own leaders. 

A wild fanaticism seized the people. Heated with pas- 
sion and religious hatred, they endeavored only to injure 
«ach other ; and, with the exception of some party leaders, 
who made use of this excitement for the accomplishment 
of their own ambitious schemes, their only object was to 
acquire the superiority for their own creed by fire and 
sword. 

The horrible effect of Catharine's policy was the massa- 
cre of St. Bartholomew's (1572), of w^hich she and her 
son, her pupil in dissimulation, had laid the plan with their 
confidants. Shortly before the line of kings of the house 
of Valois had become extinct with Henry III., and the 
way was opened for the house of Bourbon, the head of 
which was the Protestant Henry, king of Navarre, the re- 
lations of the two parties became still more involved. 

The feeble king found himself compelled to "unite with 
the king of Navarre against the common enemy, as the 
intrigues of the ambitious Guises, who openly aimed at the 
throne, had excited the people against him to such a de- 
gree, that he was on the point of losing the crown. 

After the assassination of Henry III., the king of Na- 
varre was obliged to maintain a severe struggle for the 
vacant throne ; and not until he had, by the advice of 
Sully, embraced the Catholic religion (1593), did he enjoy 
quiet possession of the kingdom. 

Five years afterwards he secured to the Huguenots their 
civil rights by the edict of Nantes, which confirmed to 
them the free exercise of their religion, and gave them 



264 



HUGUENOTS. 



equal claims with the Catholics to all offices and dignities. 
They were also left in possession of the fortresses which 
had heen ceded to them for their security. 

This edict afforded them a means of forming a kind of 
republic within the kingdom, and such a powerful party, 
which had for a long time been obliged to be distrustful 
of the government, would always offer to the restless no- 
bility a rallying point and a prospect of assistance. 

Louis XIII., the weak and bigoted son of the liberal 
and magnanimous Henry IV., allowed himself to be influ- 
enced by his ambitious favorite, De Luines, and his con- 
fessor, against the Huguenots, who were able to offer a 
powerful resistance, as they had become very numerous in 
many provinces. But in the first religious war, which 
broke out in 1621, the Protestants lost the greatest part 
of their strong places, through the faithlessness or coward- 
ice of the governors. Some of these, however, and among 
the rest Rochelle, remained to them, when, disunited among 
themselves and weary of war, they concluded a peace. 

Rochelle enabled them to keep up a connection with 
England ; and Richelieu, who aimed to make the royal 
power, which he exercised under the name of Louis, abso- 
lute, used every means to deprive the Protestants of this 
bulwark of their liberty, and thus destroy every remnant 
of a league which recalled the times when civil factions 
had so often weakened the royal power. 

Rochelle fell into the hands of Louis, after an obstinate 
defence, in 1629 ; the Huguenots were obliged to surrender 
all their strong holds, and were thus left entirely at the 
mercy of the king. Preedom of conscience was indeed 
promised them, and Richelieu and his successor Mazarin 
did not disturb them in the enjoyment of it ; but when 
Louis XIV. abandoned his voluptuous life for an affected 
devotion, he was led by his confessors and Madame de 



HUGUENOTS. 



265 



Maintenon, to persecute tlie Protestants, for the purpose 
of bringing them back to the bosom of the true church. 

In 1681, he deprived them of most of their civil rights, 
and, on the death of Colbert, who had generally opposed 
violent measures, he followed altogether the advice of his 
counsellors, who were in favor of persecution — his minister 
of war, Louvois, the chancellor Le Tellier, and the Jesuit 
La Chaise, his father confessor. Bodies of dragoons were 
Bent into the southern provinces, where the Protestants 
were most numerous, to compel the unhappy inhabitants 
to abjure their faith. 

To prevent the emigration of the Protestants, the fron- 
tiers were guarded wath the utmost vigilance ; yet more 
than 500,000 Huguenots fled to Switzerland, Germany, 
Holland, and England. Many, who could not escape, 
were obliged to renounce their faith. 

Lists of Protestants who, it was pretended, had been 
converted, were sent to the king, and it was very easy for 
his flattering counsellors to persuade him that he had 
gained honor by having almost extirpated the Protestants 
in France. Under this erroneous supposition, he revoked 
the edict of Nantes, October 22, 1685. But he had still 
more than half a million of Protestant subjects, and this 
unjust and unwise revocation robbed France of a great 
number of useful and rich inhabitants, whose industry, 
wealth, and skill found a welcome reception in foreign 
countries. 

But quiet was by no means restored in France. In the 
provinces between the Bhone and Garonne, the Protestants 
were yet very numerous, and the neighboring mountains 
of Cevennes afforded them shelter. There the Camisarda 
maintained war for a long time, armed for the most part 
with clubs alone. The contest was not altogether unlike 
the war of La Vendee in later times. 

23 



266 



HUGUENOTS. 



After twenty years (1T06), the government was finally 
obliged to come to terms with them ; yet quiet was not 
perfectly restored. In the level country, especially at 
Nismes, a Protestant spirit still survived in secret ; even 
the compassion of the Catholics was excited, and many 
persecutors of the Protestants became their defenders; 
and there were not wanting clergymen among the Hugue- 
nots, who were kept concealed. 

In the reign of Louis XV., new but less severe measures 
were adopted against the Protestants, and, in 1746, they 
ventured to appear publicly in Languedoc and Dauphiny. 
By degrees, many voices were raised in favor of religious 
toleration. Montesquieu led the way ; but Voltaire, 
shocked by the unhappy fate of John Galas, effected still 
more by his Essay on Toleration, in 1762. 

From this time Protestants were no longer disturbed , 
yet they did not dare to make pretensions to public offices. 
The Revolution restored them all their civil rights, and 
they frequently laid out their hitherto secreted treasures 
in the purchase cf the national domains. It was not 
therefore strange that, at the Kostoration, they appeared 
attached to the former government, which had granted 
them privileges that they were fearful of losing under the 
new. Although they did not offer any opposition to the 
new order of things, yet troubles took place, which were 
attended with bloodshed, at Nismes and the vicinity ; but 
these were suppressed by the judicious measures of the 
government. 

On the revocation of the edict of Nantes, a considerable 
Dumber of Protestants fled for refuge to America, most 
of whom settled in South Carolina. Dr. Bamsey, in his 
History of South Carolina, thus notices this little colony 
of Huguenots : 

The revocation of the edict of Nantes, fifteen years 



FRIENDS. 



267 



subsequent to the settlement of Carolina, contributed much 
to its population. In it, soon after that event, were trans- 
planted from France the stocks from which have sprung 
the respectable families of Bonneau, Bounetheau, Bor- 
deaux, Benoist, Boiseau, Bocquet, Bacot, Chevalier, Cordes, 
Couterier, Chastaignier, Dupre, Delysle, Dubose, Dubois, 
Peveaux, Dutarque, De la Consiliere, De Leiseline, Doux- 
eaint, Du Pont, Du Bourdieu, D'Harriette, Faucheraud, 
Foissin, Faysoux, Gaillard^ Gendron, Gignilliat, Guerard, 
Godin, Girardeau, Guerin, Gourdine, Horry, Huger, Jean- 
nerette, Legare, Laurens, La Roche, Lenud, Lansac, Ma- 
rion, Mazyck, Manigault, Mellichamp, Mouzon, Michau, 
Neufville, Prioleau,* Peronneau, Perdriau, Porcher, Pos- 
tell, Peyre, Poyas, Ravenel, Royer, Simons, Sarazin, St. 
Julien, Serre, Trezevant. 



THE SOCIETY OF FEIENDS. 

A SECT which took its rise in England about the middle 
of the seventeenth century, and rapidly found its way into 
other countries in Europe, and into the English settlements 
in North America. The members of this society, we believe, 
called themselves at first Seekers^ from their seeking the 

* The Rev. Elias Prioleau, the founder of the eminently respect- 
Able family of that name in Carolina, migrated thither soon after 
the revocation of the edict of Mantes, and brought with him from 
France a considerable part of his Protestant congregation. He was 
the grandson of Anthoine Prioli, who was elected Doge of Venice 
in the year 1618. Many of his numerous descendants, who were 
born and constantly resided in or near Charleston, have approached 
or exceeded their seventieth year; and several have survived, or 
aow survive, their eightieth. 



268 FRIENDS. 

truth ; but after the society was formed, they assumed the j 
appellation of Friends. The name of Quakers was given I 
to them by their enemies, and though an epithet of reproach, 
seems to be stamped upon them indelibly. George Fox is 
supposed to be their first founder ; but after the restoration, 
Penn and Barclay gave to their principles a more regulai 
form. 

The doctrines of their society have been variously repre- 
sented ; and some have thought and taken pains to prove 
them favorable to Socinianism. But, according to Penn, 
they believe in the Holy Three, or the trinity of the Father, 
Word, and Spirit, agreeably to the Scripture. In reply to 
the charge that they deny Christ to be God, Penn says 
'Hhat it is a most untrue and uncharitable censure —that, 
they truly and expressly own him to be so according to the 
Scripture." To the objection that they deny the human 
nature of Christ, he answers, " We never taught, said, or 
held so gross a thing, but believe him to be truly and pro- 
perly man like us, sin only excepted." The doctrines of 
the fall, and the redemption by Christ, are, according to 
him, believed firmly by them ; and he declares " that they 
own Jesus Christ as their sacrifice, atonement, and prO' 
pitiation." 

But we shall here state a further account of their prin* 
ciples and discipline, as extracted from a summary trans- 
mitted from one of their most respectable members. 

They tell us that about the beginning of the seventeenth 
century, a number of men, dissatisfied with all the modes 
of religious worship then known in the world, withdrew 
from the communion of every visible church to seek the 
Lord in retirement. Among these was their honorable elder, 
G-eorge Fox, who, being quick(;ned by the immediate touches 
of divine love, could not satifiFy his apprehensions of duty 
to God without directing the people where to find the like 



FRIENDS. 



269 



consolation and instruction. In the course of his travels, 
he met with many seeking persons in circumstances similar 
to his own, and these readily received his testimony. They 
then give us a short account of their sufferings and differ- 
ent settlements ; they also vindicate Charles 11. from the 
character of a persecutor ; acknowledging that, though they 
Buffered much during his reign, he gave as little counte- 
nance as he could to the severities of the legislature. They 
even tell us that he exerted his influence to rescue their 
friends from the unprovoked and cruel persecutions they 
met with in New England ; and they speak with becoming 
gratitute of the different acts passed in their favor during 
the reigns of William and Mary, and George I. They 
then proceed to give us the following account of their 
doctrine : — 

*' We agree with other professors of the Christian name, 
in the belief of one eternal God, the Creator and Preserver 
of the universe : and in Jesus Christ his Son, the Messiah 
and mediator of the new covenant (Heb. xii. 24). 
, "When we speak of the gracious display of the love 
of God to mankind, in the miraculous conception, birth, 
life, miracles, death, resurrection, and ascension of our 
Saviour, we prefer the use of such terms as we find in Scrip- 
ture ; and, contented with that knowledge which divine 
wisdom hath seen meet to reveal, we attempt not to explain 
those mysteries which remain under the veil ; nevertheless 
we acknowledge and assert the divinity of Christ, who is 
the wisdom and power of God unto salvation (1 Cor. i. 24). 

" To Christ alone we give the title of the. Word of God, 
(John i. 1), and not to the Scriptures, although we highly 
esteem these sacred writings, in subordination to the Spirit 
(2 Pet. i. 21) from which they were given forth ; and we 
bold, with the apostle Paul, that they are able to make wise 

23* 



270 



FRIENDS. 



unto salvation, through faith, which is in Christ Jesus (2 
Tim. iii. 15). 

" We reverence those most excellent precepts which are 
recorded in Scripture to have been delivered by our great 
Lord ; and we firmly believe that they are practicable, and 
binding on every Christian ; and that in the life to come 
every man will be rewarded according to his works (Matt, 
xvi. 27). And, further, it is our belief that, in order to 
enable mankind to put in practice these sacred precepts, 
many of which are contradictory to the unregenerate will 
of man (John i. 9), every man coming into the world is 
endued with a measure of the light, grace, or good Spirit 
of Christ ; by which, as it is attended to, he is enabled to 
distinguish good from evil, and to correct the disorderly 
passions and corrupt propensities of his nature, which mere 
reason is altogether insufficient to overcome. For all that 
belongs to man is fallible, and within" the reach of tempta- 
tion ; but this divine grace, which comes by him who hath 
overcome the world (John xvi. 33 j, is, to those who humbly 
and sincerely seek it, an all-sufficient and present help in 
time of need. By this the snares of the enemy are detected, 
his allurements avoided, and deliverance is experienced 
through faith in its effectual operation ; whereby the soul 
is translated out of the kingdom of darkness, and from 
under the power of Satan, unto the marvellous light and 
^Angdom of the Son of God. 

"Being thus persuaded that man, without the Spirit 
of Christ inwardly revealed, can do nothing to the glory 
of God, or to effect h\s own salvation, we think this influ- 
gnce especially necessary to the performance of the highest 
act of which the human mind is capable ; even the worship 
of the Father of light and of spirits, in spirit and in truth; 
therefore we consider, ^ns obstructions to pure worship, all 
forms which divert ih^ attention of the mind from the 



FRIENDS. 



271 



secret influence of this unction from the Holy One (I John 
ii. 20, 27). Yet, although true worship is not confined to 
time and place, we think it incumbent on Christians to meet 
often together (Heb. x. 25), in testimony of their depend- 
ence on the heavenly Father, and for a renewal of their 
spiritual strength ; nevertheless, in the performance of wor- 
ship, we dare not depend for our acceptance with him on 
a formal repetition of the words and experiences of others ; 
but we believe it to be our duty to lay aside the activity 
of the imagination, and to wait in silence to have a true 
sight of our condition bestowed upon us ; believing even a 
single sigh (Rom. vii. 24) arising from such a sense of cur 
infirmities, and of the need we have of divine help, to be 
more acceptable to God than any performances, however 
specious, which originate in the will of man. 

^' From what has been said respecting worship, it follows 
that the ministry we approve must have its origin from the 
same source ; for that which is needful for man's own direc- 
tion, and for his acceptance with God (Jer. xxiii. 30 to 32), 
must be eminently so to enable him to be helpful to others. 
Accordingly, we believe that the renewed assistance of the 
light and power of Christ is indispensably necessary for 
all true ministry, and that this holy influence is not at our 
command, or to be procured by study, but in the free gift 
of God to chosen and devoted servants. Hence arises our 
testimony against preaching for hire, in contradiction to 
Christ's positive command, ^ Freely ye have received, freely 
give' (Matt. x. 8) ; and hence our conscientious refusal to 
support such ministry by tithes, or other means. 

"As we dare not encourage any ministry but that which 
we believe to spring from the influence of the Holy Spirit, 
so neither dare we attempt to restrain this influence to 
persons of any condition in life, or to the male sex alone ; 
but, as male and female are one in Christ, we allov/ 



272 



FRIENDS. 



of the female sex as we believe to be endued with a right 
qualification for the ministry, to exercise their gifts for the 
general edification of the church ; and this liberty we esteem 
a peculiar mark of the Gospel dispensation, as foretold by 
the prophet Joel (Joel ii. 28, 29) ; and noticed by the apostle 
Peter (Acts ii. 16, 17). 

There are two ceremonies in use among most professors 
of the Christian name, — water baptism, and what is termed 
the Lord's Supper. The first of these is generally esteemed 
the essential means of initiation into the church of Christ; 
and the latter of maintaining communion with him. But 
as we have been convinced that nothing short of his re- 
deeming power, invariably revealed, can set the soul free 
from the thraldom of sin, by this power alone we believe 
salvation to be efiected. We hold that, as there is one 
Lord and one faith (Eph. iv. 5), so his baptism is one in 
nature and operation ; that nothing short of it can make 
us living members of his mystical body ; and that the 
baptism with water, administered by his forerunner John, 
belonged, as the latter confessed, to an inferior dispensa- 
tion (John iii. 30). 

" With respect to the other rite, we believe that commu- 
nion between Christ and his church is not maintained by 
that nor any other external performance, but only by a 
real participation of his divine nature (1 Pet. ii. 4) through 
faith ; that this is the supper alluded to in the Revelation 
(Rev. vii. 20) : ' Behold I stand at the door and knock : 
if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come 
in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me and 
that where the substance is attained, it is unnecessary to 
attend to the shadow, which doth not confer grace, and 
concerning which opinions so difierent and animosities so 
violent have arisen. 

" Now, as we thus believe that the grace of God, whicb 



FRIENDS. 



273 



comes by Jesus Christ, is alone sufficient for salvation, we 
can neither admit that it is conferred on a few only, whilst 
others are left without it, nor, thus asserting its univer- 
sality, can we limit its operation to a partial cleansing 
of the soul from sin, even in this life. We entertain wor^ 
thier notions both of the power and goodness of our hea- 
venly Father, and believe that he doth vouchsafe to assist 
the obedient to experience a total surrender of the natural 
will to the guidance of his pure, unerring Spirit, through 
whose renewed assistance they are enabled to bring forth 
fruits unto holiness, and to stand perfect in their present 
rank (Matt. v. 48 ; Eph. iv. 13 ; Col. iv. 12). 

"There are not many of our tenets more generally 
known than our testimony against oaths, and against war. 
With respect to the former of these, we abide literally by 
Christ's positive injunction, delivered in his sermon on the 
mount, * Swear not at all' (Matt. v. 34). From the same sa- 
cred collection of the most excellent precepts of moral and 
religious duty, from the example of our Lord himself (Matt. 
V. 39, 44, &c.; xxvi. 52, 53 ; Luke xxii. 51 ; John xviii. 
11), and from the correspondent convictions of his Spirit 
in our hearts, we are confirmed in the belief that wars and 
fightings are in their origin and effects utterly repugnant 
to the Gospel, which still breathes peace and good-will to 
men. We also are clearly of the judgment that if the be- 
nevolence of the Gospel were generally prevalent in the 
minds of men, it would effectually prevent them from op- 
pressing, much more from enslaving, their brethren (of what- 
ever color or complexion), for whom, as for themselves, 
Christ died; and would even influence their conduct in 
their treatment of the brute creation, which wo'ild no longer 
groan, the victims of their avarice, or of their false ideas 
of pleasure. 

" Some of our ideas have, in former times, as hath been 

s 



274 



FRIENDS. 



shown, subjected our friends to much suftering from govern- 
ment, though to the salutary purposes of government our 
principles are a security. They inculcate submission to 
the laws in all cases wherein conscience is not violated. 
But we hold that as Christ's kingdom is not of this world, 
it is not the business of the civil magistrate to interfere in 
matters of religion, but to maintain the external peace and 
good order of the community. We therefore think perse- 
cution, even in the smallest degree, unwarrantable. We 
are careful in requiring our members not to be concerned 
in illicit trade, nor in any manner to defraud the revenue. 

" It is well known that the society, from its first appear- 
ance, has disused those names of the months and days, 
which, having been given in honor of the heroes or false 
gods of the heathen, originated in their flattery or super- 
stition ; and the custom of speaking to a single person in 
the plural number, as having arisen also from motives 
of adulation. Compliments, superfluity of apparel and 
furniture, outward shows of rejoicing and mourning, and 
the observation of days and times, we esteem to be in- 
compatible with the simplicity and sincerity of a Christian 
life ; and public diversions, gaming, and other vain amuse- 
ments of the world, we cannot but condemn. They are a 
waste of that time which is given us for nobler purposes ; 
and divert the attention of the mind from the sober duties 
of life, and from the reproofs of instruction by which we 
are guided to an everlasting inheritance. 

" To conclude ; although we have exhibited the several 
tenets which distinguish our religious society as objects 
of our belief, yet we are sensible that a true and living 
faith is not produced in the mind of man by his own effort, 
but is the free gift of God in Christ Jesus (Eph. ii. 8), nou- 
rished and increased by the progressive operation of his 
Spirit in our hearts, and our proportionate obedience (John 



FRIENDS. 



275 



vii. 17).^ Therefore, although for the presei /ation of the 
testimonies given ns to bear, and for the peace and good 
order of the society, we deem it necessary that those who 
are admitted into membership with us should be previously 
con\dnced of those doctrines which we esteem essential, yet 
we require no formal subscription to any articles, either as 
a condition of membership, or a qualification for the service 
of the church. We prefer the judging of men by their 
fruits, and depending on the aid of Him who, by his pro- 
phet, hath promised to be ^ a spirit of judgment to him that 
sitteth in judgment.' (Is. xxviii. 6.) Without this, there is 
a danger of receiving numbers into outward communion, 
without any addition to that spiritual sheep-fold, whereof 
our blessed Lord declared himself to be both the door and 
the shepherd (John x. 7, 11) ; that is, such as know his 
voice and follow him in the paths of obedience. 

"In the practice of discipline, we think it indispensable 
that the order recommended by Christ himself be invaria- 
bly observed (Matt, xviii. 15, 17). 

"To efi'ect the salutary purposes of discipline, meetings 
were appointed at an early period of the society, which, 
from the times of their being held, were called quarterly 
meetings. It was afterwards found expedient to divide the 
districts of those meetings, and to meet more frequently, 
from whence arose monthly meetings, subordinate to those 
held quarterly. At length, in 1669, a yearly meeting was 
established, to superintend, assist, and provide rules for the 
whole, previously to which general meetings had been oc- 
casionally held. 

"A monthly meeting is usually composed of several 
particular congregations, situated within a convenient dis- 
tance from each other. Its business is to provide for the 
subsistence of the poor, and for the education of their off- 
spring; to judge of the sincerity and fitness of persona 



276 



FRIENDS. 



appearing to be convinced of the religious principles of 
the society, and desiring to be admitted into membership; 
to excite due attention to the discharge of religious and 
moral duty; and to deal with disorderly members. Monthly 
aeetings also grant to such of their members as remove 
into other monthly meetings certificates of their member- 
ship and conduct ; without which they cannot gain mem- 
bership in such meetings. Each monthly meeting is re- 
quired to appoint certain persons, under the name of 
overseers, who are to take care that the rules of our dis- 
cipline be put in practice ; and when any case of complaint 
or disGYderly conduct comes to their knowledge, to see that 
private admonition, agreeably to the gospel rule before 
mentioned, be given, previously to its being laid before the 
monthly meeting. 

When a case is introduced, it is usual for a small com- 
mittee to be appointed to visit the offender, to endeavor to 
convince him of his error, and to induce him to forsake 
and condemn it. If they succeed, the person is by minute 
declared to have made satisfaction for the offence ; if not, 
he is disowned as a member of the society. 

"In disputes between individuals, it has long been the 
decided judgment of the society that its members should 
not sue each other at law. It therefore enjoins all to end 
their differences by speedy and impartial arbitration, 
agreeably to rules laid down. If any refuse to adopt this 
mode, or, having adopted it, to submit to the award, it is 
the direction of the yearly meeting that such be disowned. 
To monthly meetings also belongs the allowing of 
marriages ; for our society hath always scrupled to ac- 
knowledge the exclusive authority of the priests in the 
solemnization of marriage. Those who intend to marry 
appear together, and propose their intention to the monthly 
meeting ; and if not attended by their parents and ^uar- 



F E I E N D S . 



277 



dians, produce a written certificate of their consent, signed 
in the presence of witnesses. The meeting then appoints 
a committee to inquire wheth^ they be clear of other en- 
gagements respecting marriage ; and if at a subsequent 
meeting, to which the parties also come and declare the 
continuance of their intention, no objections be reported 
they have, the meeting's consent to solemnize their in* 
tended marriage. This is done in a public meeting for 
worship, towards the close whereof the parties stand up, 
and solemnly take each other for husband and wife. A 
certificate of the proceedings is then publicly read, and 
signed by the parties, and afterwards by the relations and 
others as witnesses. Of such marriage the monthly meet- 
ing keeps a record ; as also of the births and burials of 
its members. A certificate of the date, of the name of 
the infant, and of its parents, signed by those present at 
the birth, is the subject of one of these last-mentioned 
records; and an order for the interment, countersigned by 
the grave-maker, of the other. The naming of children 
is without ceremony. Burials are also conducted in a sim- 
ple manner. The body, followed by the relations and 
friends, is sometimes, previously to interment, carried to a 
meeting ; and at the grave a pause is generally made ; on 
both which occasions it frequently falls out that one or 
more friends present have somewhat to express for the edi- 
fication of those who attend ; but no religious rite is con- 
sidered as an essential part of burial. 

" Several monthly meetings compose a quarterly meet- 
ing. At the quarterly meeting are produced written 
answers from the monthly meetings to certain queries re- 
specting the conduct of their members, and the meeting's 
care over them. The accounts thus received are digested 
into one,, which is sent, also in the form of answers to 
queries, by representatives to the yearly meeting. Ap- 

21 



278 



FRIENDS. 



peals from the judgment of monthly meetings are brought 
to the quarterly meetings, whose business also it is to assist 
in any difficult case, or where remissness appears in the 
care of the monthly meetings over the individuals who 
compose them. There are seven yearly meetings, viz. : 

1. London, to which come representatives from Ireland ; 

2. New England ; 3. New York ; 4. Pennsylvania and 
New Jersey ; 5. Maryland ; 6. Virginia ; 7. The Carolinas 
and Georgia. 

" The yearly meeting has the general superintendence 
of the society in the country in which it is established ; 
and, therefore, as the accounts which it receives discover 
the state of inferior meetings, as particular exigencies re 
quire, or as the meeting is impressed with a sense of duty, 
it gives its advice, making such regulations aj5 appear to 
be requisite, or excites to the observance of those already 
made ; and sometimes appoints committees to visit those 
quarterly me' tings which appear to be in need of imme- 
diate advice. Appeals from the judgment of quarterly 
meetings are here finally determined ; and a brotherly cor- 
respondence, by epistles, is maintained with other yearly 
meetings. 

" In this place it is proper to add, that, as we believe 
women may be rightly called to the work of the ministry, 
we also think that to them belongs a share in the support 
of our Christian discipline ; and that some parts of it 
wherein their own sex is concerned, devolve on them with 
peculiar propriety ; accordingly they have monthly, quar- 
terly, and yearly meetings of their own sex, held at the 
same time, and in the same place with those of the men ; 
but separately, and without the power of making rules; 
and it may be remarked, that during the persecutions 
which in the last century occasioned the imprisonment of 



I 



FRIENDS. 



279 



go many of the men, the care of the poor often fell on the 
women, and was hj them satisfactorily administered. 

" In order that those who are in the situation of minis- 
ters may have the tender sympathy and counsel of those 
of either sex who, by their experience in the work of reli- 
gion, are qualified for that service, the monthly meetings 
are advised to select such, under the denomination of 
elders. These, and ministers approved by their monthly 
meetings, have meetings peculiar to themselves, called 
meetings of ministers and elders ; in which they have an 
opportunity of exciting each other to a discharge of their 
Beveral duties, and of extending advice to those who may 
appear to be weak, without any needless exposure. Such 
meetings are generally held in the compass of each 
monthly, quarterly, and yearly meeting. They are con- 
ducted by rules prescribed by the yearly meeting, and 
have no authority to make any alteration or addition to 
them. The members of them unite with their brethren in 
the meetings for discipline, and are equally accountable to 
the latter for their conduct. ^ 

" It is to a meeting of this kind in London, called the 
gecond day's morning meeting, that the revisal of manu- 
scripts concerning our principles, previously to publication, 
is intrusted by the yearly meeting ; and also the granting, 
in the intervals of the yearly meeting, of certificates of 
approbation to such ministers as are concerned to travel in 
the work of the ministry in foreign parts, in addition to 
those granted by their monthly or quarterly meetingB, 
When a visit of this kind doth not extend beyond Great 
Britain, a certificate from the monthly meeting of which 
the minister is a member, is sufficient ; if to Ireland, the 
concurrence of the quarterly meeting is also required. 
Regulations of similar tendency obtain in other yearly 
meetings. 



280 



F R I E X D S . 



" The yearly meeting of London, in the year 1675, ap- 
pointed a meeting to be held in that city, for the purpose 
of advising and assisting in cases of suffering for con- 
science* sake, vrhich hath continued with great use to the 
society to this day. It is composed of friends, under the 
nnme of correspondents, chosen by the several quarterly 
meetings, and who reside in or near the society. The 
same meetings also appoint members of their own in the 
country correspondents, who are to join their brethren 
in Lond m on emergency. The names of all these corres- 
pondents, previously to their being recorded as such, are 
submitted to the approbation of the yearly meeting. 
Those of the men who are approved ministers are also 
membors of this meeting, which is called the meeting for 
sufferings — a name arising from its original purpose, which 
is not yet become entirely obsolete. 

" The yearly meeting has intrusted the meeting for suf- 
ferings with the care of printing and distributing books, 
and with the management of its stock ; and, considered aa 
a standing committee of the yearly meeting, it hath a 
general care of whatever may arise, during the intervals 
of that meeting, affecting the society, and requiring imme- 
diate attention, particularly of those circumstances which 
caay occasion an application to government. 

" There is not, in any of the meetings which have been 
mentioned, any president, as we believe that divine wisdom 
alone ought to preside ; nor hath any member a right to 
claim pre-eminence over the rest. The office of clerk^ 
with a few exceptions, is undertaken voluntarily by some 
member, as is also the keeping of the records. Wlien 
these are very voluminous, and require a house for their 
deposit (iS is the case in London, where the general re- 
cords of the society in Great Britain are kept), a clerk is 
hired to have the care of them ; but except a few clerks 



FRIENDS, 



281 



of this kind, and persons who have the care of meeting- 
houses, none receiva any stipend or gratuity for their ser- 
vices in our religious society/- 

In this country a few members of the Society of Friends 
came to New England about 1640, but the principal early 
migration was to Pennsylvania and Delaware from 1656 
to 1700. They have at present meetings in twenty-four 
States, but are not found in considerable numbers in more 
than fourteen, viz. : Del., 111., Ind., Md., Mass., Mich., 
N. H., N. J., ]Sr. Y., N. C, O., Pa., E. I. and Ya. There 
was, a little more than fifty years since, a schism in their 
ranks, a number of the meetings adopting the views of 
Elias Hicks, one of their ministers, who differed from the 
Friends generally in his views of the Trinity and in some 
other points. This schism still continues, and those who 
adhere to the old doctrines are distinguished as Orthodox 
Friends, and the followers of Mr. Hicks as Liberal Friends 
or Hicksites. The Orthodox hold the views set forth in 
the previous pages, without modification. 

The statistics of the Orthodox Friends in 1871 were: 
10 yearly meetings, 562 societies, 503 meeting-houses, 
57,405 members, about 65,000 children in the first-day 
schools, 3 collegiate schools — viz., at Haverford, Philadel- 
phia county. Pa. ; Eichmond, Ind., and Salem, Iowa — 
4 or 5 other schools and 3 periodicals. The Hicksite 
Friends have six yearly meetings, about 200 societies, 196 
meeting-houses, and about 32,000 members. They have 
one college — Swarthmore College, near Philadelphia — and 
a number of schools. 

24* 



282 



ARIANS. 



AEIANS. 

Arians, followers of Arius, a presbyter of the cliurch 
of Alexandria, about 315, who maintained that the Son of 
God was totally and essentially distinct from the Father ; 
that he was the first and noblest of those beings whom 
God had created — the instrument, by whose subordinate 
operation he formed the universe ; and, therefore, inferior 
to the Father both in nature and dignity ; also, that the 
Holy Ghost was not God, but created by the power of the 
Son. 

The Arians owned that the Son was the Word; but 
denied that Word to have been eternal. They held that 
Christ had nothing of man in him but the flesh, to which 
the Xo^oj, or word, was joined, which was the same as the 
soul in us. The Arians were first condemned and ana- 
thematized by a council at Alexandria, in 320, under 
Alexander, bishop of that city, who accused Arius of 
impiety, and caused him to be expelled from the commu- 
nion of the church ; and afterwards by 380 fathers in the 
general council of Nice, assembled by Constantino, in 325. 
His doctrine, however, was not extinguished ; on the con- 
trary, it became the reigning religion, especially in the east. 

Arius was recalled from banishment by Constantino in 
two or three years after the council of Nice, and the laws 
that had been enacted against him were repealed. Not- 
withstanding this, Athanasius, then bishop of Alexandria^ 
refused to admit him and his followers to communion. 
This so enraged them, that, by their interest at court, they 
procured that prelate to be deposed and banished ; but the 
church of Alexandria still refusing to admit Arius into 
their communion, the emperor sent for him to Constant!- 



ARI ANS. 



283 



nople ; where upon delivering in a fresh confession of his 
faith in terms less offensive, the emperor commanded him 
to be received into their communion ; but that very even- 
ing, it is said, Arius died as his friends were conducting 
him in triumph to the great church of Constantinople. 

Arius, pressed by a natural want, stepped aside, but 
expired on the spot, his bowels gushing out. The Arian 
party, however, found a protector in Constantinus, who 
succeeded his father in the East. They underwent various 
revolutions and persecutions under succeeding emperors, 
till, at length, Theodosius the Great exerted every effort 
to suppress them. Their doctrine was carried, in the fifth 
century, into Africa, under the Vandals ; and into Asia 
under the Goths. Italy, Gaul, and Spain, were also 
deeply infected with it ; and towards the commencement 
of the sixth century, it was triumphant in many parts of 
Asia, Africa, and Europe ; but it sunk almost at once, 
when the Vandals were driven out of Africa, and the 
Goths out of Italy by the arms of Justinian. However, it 
revived again in Italy, under the protection of the Lom- 
bards, in the seventh century, and was not extinguished 
till about the end of the eighth. Arianism was again 
revived in the West by Servetus, in 1531, for which he 
suffered death. 

After this, the doctrine got footing in Geneva and in 
Poland; but at length degenerated in a great measure 
into Socinianism. Erasmus, it is thought, aimed at 
reviving it, in his commentaries on the 'New Testament ; 
and the learned Grotius seems to lean that way. Mr. 
Whiston was one of the first divines who revived this con- 
troversy in the eighteenth century. He was followed by 
Dr. Clarke, who was chiefly opposed by Dr. Waterland. 
Those who hold the doctrine which is usually called Low 
Arianism, say that Christ pre-existed; but not as the 



284 



ARMENIANS. 



eternal Logos of the Father, or as the being by whom he 
made the worlds, and had intercourse with the patriarchs, 
or as having any certain rank or employment whatever in 
the divine dispensations. In modern times, the term Ariayt 
is indiscriminately applied to those who consider Jesua 
simply subordinate to the Father. Some of them believe 
Christ to have been the creator of the world ; but they all 
maintain that he existed previously to his incarnation, 
though in his pre-existent state they assign him different 
degrees of dignity. Hence the terms High and Low Arian 



AEMENIANS. 

The Armenians are the inhabitants of Armenia, whose 
religion is the Christian of the Eutychian sect ; that is, 
they hold but one nature in Jesus Christ. They assert 
also the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Father 
only. They believe that Christ, at his descent into hell, 
freed the souls of the damned from thence, and reprieved 
them to the end of the woild, when they shall be remanded 
to eternal flames. They believe that the souls of the 
righteous shall not be admitted to the beatific vision till 
after the resurrection, notwithstanding which they pray 
to departed saints, adore their pictures, and burn lamps 
before them. The Armenian clergy consist of patriarchs, 
archbishops, doctors, secular priests, and monks. The 
Armenian monks are of the order of St. Basil ; and every 
Wednesday and Friday they eat neither fish, nor eggs, 
nor oil, nor anything made of milk ; and during Lent they 
live upon nothing but roots. They have seven sacraments, 
baptism, confirmation, penance, the eucharist, extreme 



ARMINIANS. 



285 



unction, orders, and matrimony. They admit infants to 
the communion at two or three months old. They seem 
to place the chief part of their religion in fastings and 
abstinences ; and, among the clergy, the higher the degree, 
the lower they must live ; insomuch, that it is said the 
archbishops live on nothing but pulse. They consecrate 
holy water but once a year, at which time every one fills 
a pot and carries it home, which brings in a considerable 
revenue to the church. 



ARMINIANS. 

The Arminians are persons who follow tne doctrines of 
Arminius, who was pastor at Amsterdam, and afterwards 
professor of divinity at Leyden. Arminius had been 
educated in the opinions of Calvin ; but, thinking the 
doctrine of that great man with regard to free will, pre- 
destination, and grace, too severe, he began to express hia 
doubts concerning them in the year 1591 ; and, upon 
further inquiry, adopted the sentiments of those whose 
religious system extends the love of the Supreme Being 
and the merits of Jesus Christ to all mankind. The 
Arminians are also called Remonstrants, because, in 1611, 
they presented a remonstrance to the states-general, 
wherein they state their grievances, and pray for relief. 

The distinguishing tenets of the Arminians may be 
comprised in the five following articles relative to predes- 
tination, universal redemption, the corruption of man, 
conversion, and perseverance, viz. : 

I. That God, from all eternity, determined to bestow 
Balvation on those who he foresaw would persevere unto 
the end ; and to inflict everlasting punishments on those 
who should continue their unbelief, and resist his divine 



286 



ARMINIANS. 



succors ; so that election was conditional, and reprobation 
in like manner the result of foreseen infidelity and perse- 
vering wickedness. 

II. That Jesus Christ, by his sufferings and death, made 
an atonement for the sins of all mankind in general, and 
of every individual in particular ; that, however, none but 
those who believe in him can be partakers of divine benefits. 

III. That true faith cannot proceed from the exercise 
of our natural faculties and powers, nor from the force 
and operation of free will ; since man, in consequence of 
his natural corruption, is incapable either of thinking or 
doing any good thing ; and that, therefore, it is necessary, 
in order to his conversion and salvation, that he be re- 
generated and renewed by the operations of the Holy 
Ghost, which is the gift of God through Jesus Christ. 

lY. That this divine grace or energy of the Holy Ghost 
begins and perfects everything that can be called good in 
man, and, consequently, all good works are to be attributed 
to God alone ; that, nevertheless, this grace is offered to 
all, and does not force men to act against their inclinations, 
but may be resisted and rendered ineffectual by the per- 
verse will of the impenitent sinner. Some modern Armin- 
ians interpret this and the last article with a greater 
latitude. 

V. That God gives to the truly faithful, who are regene- 
rated by his grace, the means of preserving themselves in 
this state. The first Arminians, indeed, had some doubt 
with respect to the closing part of this article ; but their 
followers uniformly maintain "that the regenerate may 
lose true justifying faith, fall from a state of grace, and 
die in their sins." 

After the appointment of Arminius to the theological 
ehai" at Leyden, he thought it his duty to avow and vin- 
dicate the principles which he hid embraced ; and the 



ARMINIANS. 



287 



freedom with which he published and defended tnem, 
exposed him to the resentment of those that adhered to 
the theological system of Geneva, which then prevailed in 
Holland ; but his principal opponent was Gomar, his col- 
league. The controversy which was thus begun became 
more general after the death of Arminius, in the year 
1609, and threatened to involve the United Provinces in 
civil discord. The Arminian tenets gained ground under 
the mild and favorable treatment of the magistrates of 
Holland, and were adopted by several persons of merit 
and distinction. The Calvanists or Gomarists, as they 
were now called, appealed to a national synod ; accord- 
ingly, the synod of Dort convened, by order of the states- 
general, in 1618 ; and was composed of ecclesiastic depu- 
ties from the United Provinces, as well as from the re- 
formed churches of England, Hessia, Bremen, Switzerland, 
and the Palatinate. The principal advocate in favor of 
the Arminians was Episcopius, who at that time was pro- 
fessor of divinity at Leyden. It was first proposed to 
discuss the principal subjects in dispute, that the Arminians 
should be allowed to state and vindicate the grounds on 
which their opinions were founded ; but, some difference 
arising as to the proper mode of conducting the debate, 
the Arminians were excluded from the assembly, their 
case was tried in their absence, and they were pronounced 
guilty of pestilential errors, and condemned as corrupters 
of the true religion. A curious account of the proceedings 
of the above synod may be seen in a series of letters 
written tj Mr. John Hales, who was present on the 
occasion. 

In consequence of the above-mentioned decision, the 
Arminians were considered as enemies to their country 
and its established religion, and were much persecuted. 
They were treated with great severity, and deprived of ail 



288 



B AXTERI ANS 



their posts and employments; their ministers were silenced, 
and their congregations were suppressed. The great 
Barneveldt was beheaded on a scaffold ; and the learned 
Grotius, being condemned to perpetual imprisonment, fled, 
and took refuge in France. 

After the death of Prince Maurice, who had been a 
violent partisan in favor of the Gomarists, in the year 
1625, the Arminian exiles were restored to their former 
reputation and tranquillity ; and, under the toleration of 
the state, they erected churches and founded a colle,'|e at 
Amsterdam, appointing Episcopius the first theological 
professor. The Arminian system has very much prevailed 
in England since the time of Archbishop Laud, and its 
votaries in other countries are very numerous. It is 
generally supposed that a majority of the clergy in loth 
the established churches of Great Britain favor the 
Arminian system, notwithstanding their articles are strictly 
Calvinistic. The name of Mr. John Wesley need hardly 
be mentioned here. Every one knows what an advocate 
he was for the tenets of Arminius, and the success he met 
with. 



THE BAXTERIANS 

Are so called from the learned and pious Mr. Richard 
Baxter, who was born in the year 1615. His design was 
to reconcile Calvin and Arminius : for this purpose he 
formed a middle scheme between their systems. He 
taught that God had elected some, whom he is determined 
to save, without any foresight of their good works : and 
that others to whom the gospel is preached have common 
grace, which, if they improve, they shall obtain saving 
grace, according to the doctrine of Arminius. This deno 



BAXT BRIANS. 



289 



uiination own, Vrith Calvin, that the merits of Christ's 
death are to be applied to believers only ; but they also 
assert that all men are in a state ca.pable of salvation. 

Mr. Baxter maintains that there may be a certainty of 
perseverance here, and yet he cannot tell whether a man 
may not have so weak a degree of saving grace as to lose 
It again. 

In order to prove that the death of Christ has put all in 
a state capable of salvation, the following arguments are 
alleged by this learned author : — 1. It was the nature of 
all mankind which Christ assumed at his incarnation, and 
the sins of all mankind were the occasion of his suffering. 
— -2. It was to Adam, as the common father of lapsed 
mankind, that God made the promise (Gen. iii. 15). The 
conditional new covenant does equally give Christ, pardon, 
and life to all mankind, on condition of acceptance. The 
conditional grant is universal ; Whoever believeth shall be 
mved. — 3. It is not to the elect only, but to all mankind, 
that Christ has commanded his ministers to proclaim his 
gospel, and offer the benefits of his procuring. 

There are, Mr. Baxter allows, certain fruits of Christ's 
death which are proper to the elect only: — 1. Grace even- 
tually worketh in them true faith, repentance, conversion, 
and union with Christ as his living members. — 2. The 
actual forgiveness of sin as to the spiritual and eternal 
punishment. — 3. Our reconciliation with God, and adop- 
tion and right to the heavenly inheritance. — 4. The Spirit 
of Christ to dwell in us and sanctify us, by a habit of 
divine love, Eom. viii. 9-13; Gal. v. 6. — 5. Employment 
m holy, acceptable service, and access in prayer, with a 
promise of being heard through Christ, Heb. ii. o, 6; 
John xiv. 13. — 6. Well-grounded hopes of salvation, 
peace of conscience, and spiritual communion with the 
Church mystical in heaven and earth, Rom. v. 12 ; IJeb. 

25 T 



290 



SHAKERS. 



xii. 22. — 7. A special interest in Christ and intercession 
with the Father, Rom. viii. 32, 33. 8. Resurrection unto 
life, and justification in judgment ; glorification of the soul 
at death, and of the body at the resurrection, Phil. iii. 20^ 
21 ; 2 Cor. v. 1, 2, 3. 

Christ has made a conditional deed of gift of these 
benefits to all mankind; but the elect only accept and 
possess them. Hence he infers that, though Christ never 
absolutely intended or decreed that his death should even- 
tually put all men in possession of those benefits, yet he 
did intend and decree that all men should have a condi- 
tional gift of them by his death. 

Baxter, it is said, wrote one hundred and twenty books, 
and had sixty written against him. Twenty thousand of 
his Call to the Unconverted were sold in one year. He 
told a friend that six brothers were converted by reading 
that Call. The eminent Mr. Elliott, of New England, 
translated this tract into the Indian tongue. A young 
Indian prince was so taken with it, that he read it with 
tears, and died with it in his hand. 



SHAKEES, 

OE UNITED SOCIETY OP BELIEVERS IN CHRIST'S 
SECOND APPEARING. 

This singular religious organization, though having its 
origin among the Society of Friends in England, has de- 
veloped itself only in the United States, and its members 
are very unlike the Friends at the present day. In 1747, 
several of the Quakers in Manchester, England, among 
whom were James and Mrs. Wardley, a Mr. Lee and liis 



SHAKERS. 



291 



wife, and some others, Avitlidrew from the society, and were 
distinguished by the greater frequency and violence of the 
physical manifestations which were to a certain extent 
common at that time in all the meetings of the Friends. 
They indulged in shouting, dancing after a peculiar style, 
trembling, speaking with tongues, etc., but these attracted 
little attention till they became so boisterous on the Sab- 
bath that the whole party were arrested, fined and impris- 
oned under the charge of Sabbath-breaking. 

Among those thus punished was Ann Lee Stanley, a 
daughter of the Mr. and Mrs. Lee above named, born in 
1736, married to Abraham Stanley in 1756, and who with 
her husband had joined this society. She was apparently 
a woman of very ordinary mind, of little education and 
plain in person, but of a mystical turn of mind. In 1770 
this woman began to profess to have received revelations 
from heaven. These revelations, it was said, pointed her 
out as the founder of a nevv- faith, and assured her followers 
of her inspiration, and she received from her disciples the 
name of Mother Ann Lee. After the death of her hns- 
band, she, with 9 of the members of the society, emigrated 
to America in 1774, and one of the number dying soon 
after landing, the survivors ascended the Hudson River 
to Niskayuna, now Y/atervliet, 7 miles from Albany, where 
they settled. For some years there vvas very little increase 
in their numbers; but after a revival at IN'ew Lebanon, 
I^. Y., in 1779, which had been attended with physical 
manifestations similar to those of a little later period in 
Kentucky and Tennessee, some of the converts visited 
Mother Ann at "Watervliet, and became converts to her 
doctrines. Others follov\'ed, and the number of her adhe- 
rents rapidly increased. In 1784, Mother Ann died, giving 
directions in regard to the future polity of the society, 
specifying particularly the organization of unitary house- 



292 



SHAKERS. 



holds and the community of goods. In 1787, Joseph Mea- 
cham, formerly a Baptist preacher, became their leader and 
founded the settlement at New Lebanon, and in five years 
had established eleven villages and a considerably larger 
number of unitary households. All the villages are on the 
same general plan. From 500 to 2000 acres of land are pur- 
chased, and each settlement consists of from two to eight 
households. Each family occupies a large dwelling-house, 
divided through the centre by wide halls, and capable of 
containing from 30 to 150 inmates, the men occupying one 
end and the women the other. Besides these, there are 
storehouses, workshops, dairy-houses, a school-house for the 
children they adopt, and a meeting-house. They believe 
that idleness is sinful, and hence every member who is able 
to work is employed in some useful labor. They culti- 
vate flowers, medicinal herbs and roots, fruits, vegetables, 
and collect garden and flower seeds, dry and preserve fruits, 
put up dried herbs and roots, and make medicinal extracts. 
They have also extensive manufactories of brooms, wooden 
and willow ware, cloths, flannels, etc., connected with most 
of their settlements. Their schools are generally of a high 
grade, and well supplied with apparatus and school-books. 
Their doctrines, as stated by their chief elder, are : 
" God is dual, there being an eternal Father and Mother 
in the Deity, the heavenly parents of all angelic and 
human beings. The revelation of God is progressive. In 
the first period of human history God was only known as 
a Great Spirit ; in the second period he was revealed as 
the ^I am that I am,' or Jehovah; in the third cycle, Jesus 
made him known as a Father ; and in the last cycle, com- 
mencing with 1770, he is revealed in the character of 
Mother, an eternal Mother, the bearing Spirit of all the 
creation of God. This last is regarded by them as a reve- 
lation of God's aifectional nature and of the divine love and 



SHAKERS. 



293 



tenderness. They believe Christ to be also dual, male and 
female, a supra-mundane being, and at his first appearing 
the communicator of the new revelation to Jesus, who was 
a divinely instructed, pure and perfect man, and who, in 
consequence of hLs divine anointing, became Jesus Christ. 
In the new revelation made to Jesus, these truths were first 
brought to light — the immortality of the soul, and the 
resurrection of the soul, which they define as the quicken- 
ing of the germ of a new life after the death of the first 
Adamic or generative life.^' 

The Shakers are strict celibates ; they regard marriage 
as allowable in the children of this world, the followers of 
the first Adam ; but for themselves they occupy a higher 
plane; they are called to lead a spiritual and holy life, 
free from lust and sexual indulgence, and above the order 
of natural human reproduction, being themselves " the 
children of the resurrection," and as such daily dying to 
the generative nature, as Jesus and the apostles died to it, 
and thus becoming new creatures, able to understand the 
mysteries of God. Among the other doctrines in which, 
as they believe, " Christ instructs Jesus," are human broth- 
erhood and its development in a community of goods; non- 
resistance; non-participation in any earthly government, 
and the necessity of a life of celibacy and virgin purity to 
a perfect Christianity. 

The second appearing of Christ " without sin unto sal- 
vation" they believe took place through Mother Ann Lee 
in 1770. She, " by strictly obeying the light revealed in 
her, became righteous even as Jesus was righteous. She 
acknowledged Jesus Christ as her Head and Lord, and 
formed the same character as a spiritual woman that he did 
as a spiritual man." The necessity for a second appearing 
of Christ in the female form resulted from the dual nature 
of Christ and of the Deity. " Still it was not Jesus nor 

26* 



294 



SHAKERS. 



Ann, but the priDciples already stated, which were the 
foundation of the second Christian Church. Their import- 
ance is derived from the fact of their being the first man 
and the first woman perfectly identified with the principles 
and Spirit of Christ.'^ This second appearing of Christ 
they believe to be the true resurrection state, and repudiate 
a physical resurrection as repugnant to science, reason and 
Scripture. We have noticed their 4 cycles of human re- 
ligious progress; they also believe that there are 4 heavens 
and 4 hells, the first 3 of which are still places of proba- 
tion. The first heaven and hell were for the good and 
wicked of the antedikivians ; and "the spirits in prison,'^ 
to whom Christ preached between his death and resurrec- 
tion, were the wicked of that cycle. Gehenna is the name 
they give to the second hell, in which are wicked Jews and 
heathen who died before the coming of Jesus ; and the 
second heaven is paradise, where the thief on the cross had 
the promise of going. The third heaven is that of the 
Church of the first appearing of Christ, to which Paul was 
caught up. Higher and more glorious than those which 
preceded it, it is still not the home of perfect souls. The 
hell of the third cycle is a place of torment for those who 
did not believe in nor follow Christ according; to the lio;ht 
of those days. The fourth heaven is now forming ; in it 
Jesus and Mother Ann reside, and to it will all those go 
who have resisted temptation until their evil lusts and 
propensities are all destroyed, and the life of the genera- 
tive natural man is dead in them, for such are born of God 
and cannot sin. No one but Jesus had ever attained to 
this previous to the second appearing of Christ in Mother 
Ann Lee. It is the heaven of heavens, and to it will be 
gathered not only all who accept the doctrines of the 
Shakers in this world and attain to the new birth, but all 
those in the lower heavens and hells who shall yet accept 



SHAKERS. 



295 



them ; and when their decision is finally made, the lower 
heaven and hells and the earth vAll be destroyed, and only 
the fourth heaven for the true believers and the fourth hell 
for the finally impenitent will remain. Each cycle has 
had its own Holy Spirit, the spiritual efflux from the- 
Church in the heaven of that cycle to the inhabitants of 
earth. They hold to oral confession of sins to God in the 
presence of witnesses as essential to the reception of the 
power to forsake sin. They believe that the second dis- 
j3ensation was intended to teach, by revelation, God's truth 
pertaining to the earth-life, and they regard the principles 
of the Levitical laws in relation to food, etc., as binding 
to-day as when they were given. All physical disease, the}* 
say, is the direct or indirect result of some physiological 
sin against the teachings of Moses. They believe in the 
power of their members to heal physical diseases by means 
of prayer and the regulation of the diet. The Bible they 
regard as a record of divine and angelic ministrations to 
man, and as an imperfect account of the religious experi- 
ence and history of the Jews. They believe that the mental 
and spiritual condition of the seers and prophets whose 
prophecies are therein recorded modified the revelation, 
and that it has been still farther impaired by the imper- 
fections of the translators, the book of Revelation having 
suffered less than any other, because it is incomprehensible 
to the generative man, and could not be comprehended by 
the spiritual, until the second appearing of Christ (through 
Mother Ann), as that was the key to unlock its mysteries. 
The revelations of Ann Lee and of their elders who have 
been inspired to speak the words of God, they regard as 
binding on them. 

Their mode of worship is peculiar. The two sexes are 
generally ranged in ranks facing each other, the front 
ranks being from 6 to 10 feet apart. First there is usually 



296 



S H A K E Ty S . 



an address by one of the elders on some doctrinal subject 
or some practical virtue, usually closing with a recital of 
their exalted privileges over the world's people/' After 
this they sing or rather chant a hymn, and then form in 
circles around a band of male and female singers, who 
commence with a low and monotonous recitative, but grad- 
ually, as they become excited, rise to higher and more 
rapid notes, the members at first marching and receding, 
but soon dancing ; and when, as is sometimes the case, the 
excitement and fervor become intense, their motions, 
though retaining the order and rhythm of the dance, be- 
come exceedingly rapid. At such times they believe them- 
sselves to be under the influence of spirit agencies, both of 
angels and departed members of their own brotherhood 
who have attained to greater freedom from the generative 
nature and order, and a more complete resurrection of the 
soul, than those who are still in the body. 

Two of their most judicious and experienced brethren 
and the same number of sisters are chosen to have the 
oversight of from 1 to 3 or 4 societies, and the ablest of 
them to have a general oversight over all, so that there are 
only from 20 to 24 of these ministers. Each family in 
every society has also 4 elders, viz., 2 brethren and 2 sisters, 
who have charge of it, and the temporalities are cared for 
by 2 deacons and 2 deaconesses. There are 3 classes of 
members : 1. The Novitiates, who unite with the society in 
religious faith and principle, but do not enter into tempo- 
ral connection with it. Believers of this class are not con- 
trolled as to their property, children or families. 2. The 
JuniorSy who join one of the families of the society, and 
unite in its labors and religious exercises, but who have 
not relinquished their property to the society, or, if they 
have given its improvement, may resume it at any time, 
though without interest. 3. The Seniors, who, after a full 



THEOPHILANTHROPISTS. 



297 



and complete experience of the Shaker system and faith, 
have consecrated themselves, their services and all their 
property to the society. All who retain their connection 
with the Shaker communities are amply provided for in 
health, in sickness or infirmity, and in old age. They had, 
in 1870, 18 communities, 18 meeting-houses or halls, with 
8850 sittings, of the estimated value of $86,900, while the 
entire property of the communities was over §10,000,000. 
They have about 6500 seniors, or full members ; about 
1200 juniors and novitiates, and nearly 3000 children, 
orphans and others, whom they have adopted and whom 
they educate. 



THEOPHILANTHROPISTS 

Are a sect of Deists who, in September, 1796, published 
at Paris a sort of catechism or directory for social worship, 
under the title of 3£amiel des Theanthrophiles. This reli- 
gious breviary found favor ; the congregation became nu- 
merous ; and in the second edition of their Manuel they 
assumed the less harsh denomination of Theophilanthro- 
pists, i. e., lovers of God and man. According to them, 
the temple the most worthy of the Divinity is the universe. 
Abandoned sometimes under the vault of heaven to the 
^ contemplation of the beauties of nature, they render its 
Author the homage of adoration and of gratitude. They 
nevertheless have temples erected by the hands of men, in 
which it is more commodious for them to assemble, to hear 
lessons concerning his wisdom. Certain moral inscriptions, 
a simple altar, on which they deposit a sign of gratitude 
for the benefits of the Creator, such flowers or fruits as the 



298 



THEOPHILANTHEOPISTS 



seasons afford, a tribute for the lectures and discourses, 
form the whole of the ornaments of their temples. 

The first inscription, placed above the altar, recalls to 
remembrance the two religious dogmas which are the foun- 
dation of their moral. 

First inscription. — e believe in the existence of God, 
in the immortality of the soul. Second inscription. — Wor- 
ship God, cherish your kind, render yourselves useful to 
your country. Third inscription. — Good is everything 
which tends to the preservation or the perfection of man. 
Evil is everything which tends to destroy or deteriorate 
him. Fourth inscription.- — Children, honor your fathers 
and m.others; obey them with affection, comfort their 
old age. Fathers and mothers, instruct your children. 
Fifth inscription. — ives, regard your husbands, the chiefs 
of your houses. Husbands, love your wives, and render 
yourselves reciprocally happy. 

From the concluding part of the Manuel of the Theophi- 
lanthropists, we may learn something more of their senti- 
ments. "If any one ask you," say they, "what is the 
origin of your religion and of your worship, you can answer 
him thus : Open the most ancient books which are known, 
seek there what was the religion, what the worship of the 
first human beings of which history has preserved the re- 
membrance. There you will see that their religion was 
what we now call natural religion, because it has for its 
principle even the Author of nature. It is he that has 
engraven it in the heart of the first human beings, in ours, 
n that of all the inhabitants of the earth ; this religion, 
which consists in worshipping God and cherishing our kind, 
is what we express by one single word, that of Theophi- 
lanthropy. Thus our religion is that of our first parents; 
it is yours ; it is ours ; it is the universal religion. As to 
our worship, it is also that of our first fathers. See even 



THEOPHILANTHROPISTS. 



299 



m the most ancient writings, that the exterior signs by 
which they rendered their homage to the Creator were of 
great simplicity. They dressed for him an altar of earth ; 
they offered him, in sign of their gratitude and of their 
submission, some of the productions which they held of his 
liberal hand. The fathers exhorted their children to virtue ; 
they all encouraged one another, under the auspices of the 
Divinity, to the accomplishment of their duties. This simple 
worship the sages of all nations have not ceased to profess, 
and they have transmitted it down to us without inter- 
ruption. 

" If they yet ask you of whom you hold your mission, 
answer, we hold it of God himself, who, in giving us two 
arms to aid our kind, has also given us intelligence to mu- 
tually enlighten us, and the love of good to bring us to- 
gether to virtue ; of God, who has given experience and 
wisdom to the aged to guide the young, and authority to 
fathers to conduct their children. 

*'If they are not struck with the force of those reasons, 
do not farther discuss the subject, and do not engage your- 
self in controversies, which tend to diminish the love of our 
neighbors. Our principles are the Eternal Truth ; they 
will subsist, whatever individuals may support or attack 
them, and the efforts of the wicked will not even prevail 
against them. Rest firmly attached to them, without attack- 
ing or defending any religious system ; and remember that 
similar discussions have never produced good, and that 
they have often tinged the earth with the blood of men. 
Let us lay aside systems, and apply ourselves to doing 
good; it is the only road to happiness." So much for the 
divinity of the Theophilanthropists ; a system entirely de- 
fective, because it wants the true foundation, — the word 
of God; the grand rule of all our actions, and the only 
basis on which our hopes and prospects of success can be 
built. 



300 



GNOSTICS, 



GNOSTICS. 

The Gnostics were ancient heretics, famous from tha 
first rise of Christianity, principally in the east. It 
appears from several passages of Scripture, particularly 
1 John ii. 18 ; 1 Tim. vi. 20 ; Col. ii. 8 ; that many per- 
sons were infected with the Gnostic heresy in the first 
century ; though the sect did not render itself conspicuous, 
either for numbers or reputation, before the time of Adrian, 
when some writers erroneously date its rise. The name 
was' adopted by this sect, on the presumption that they 
were the only persons who had the true knowledge of 
Christianity. Accordingly, they looked on all other 
Christians as simple, ignorant, and barbarous persons, who 
explained and interpreted the sacred writings in a low, 
literal, and unedifying signification. At first, the Gnostics 
were the only philosophers and wits of those times, who 
formed for themselves a peculiar system of theology, 
agreeable to the philosophy of Pythagoras and Plato ; to 
which they accommodated all their interpretations of 
Scripture. But Gnostics afterwards became a generical 
name, comprehending divers sects and parties of heretics, 
who rose in the first centuries ; and who, though they dif- 
fered among themselves as to circumstances, yet all agreed 
in some common principles. They corrupted the doctrine 
Df the Gospel by a profane mixture of the tenets of the 
oriental philosophy, concerning the origin of evil and the 
creation of the world, with its divine truths. Such were the 
Valentinians, Simonians, Carpocratians, Nicolaitans, &c. 

Gnostic sometimes also occurs in a good sense, in the 
ancient ecclesiastical writers, particularly Clemens Alex- 
andrinus, who in the person of his Gnostic describes the 



(JNOSTlCb?. 



301 



characters and qualities of a perfect Christian. This point 
he labors in the seventh book of his Stromata^ where he 
shows that none but the Gnostic or learned person hag 
any true religion. He affirms that, were it possible for 
the knowledge of God to be separated from eternal salva- 
tion, the Gnostic would make no scruple to choose the 
knowledge ; and that if God would promise him impunity 
in d ^ing anything that he has once spoken against, or offei 
him heaven on those terms, he would never alter a whit of 
his ineasures. In this sense the father uses Gnostics, in 
oppr'isition to the heretics of the same name ; affirming that 
the true Gnostic is grown old in the study of the holy 
Scripture, and that he preserves the orthodox doctrine of 
the apostles, and of the church ; whereas the false Gnostic 
abandons all the apostolical traditions as imagining himself 
wiser than the apostles. 

Gnostics was sometimes also more particularly used fur 
the successors of the Nicolaitans and Carpocratians, in the 
second century, upon their laying aside the names of the 
first authors. Such as would be thoroughly acquainted 
with all their doctrines, reveries, and visions, may consult 
iSt. Irenaeus, Tertullian^ Clemens Alexandrinus, Origen^ 
and St. Epiphanius ; particularly the first of these writers, 
who relates their sentiments at large, and confutes them. 
Indeed he dwells more on the Valentinians than any other 
eect of Gnostics ; but he shows the general principles 
whereon all their mistaken opinions were founded, and the 
method they followed in explaining Scripture. He accuses 
them of introducing into religion certain vain and ridicu- 
lous genealogies, i. e. a kind of divine processions or ema- 
nations, which had no other foundation but in their own 
wild imagination. The Gnostics confessed that these 
aeons, or emanations, were nowhere expressly delivered in 
the snored writings ; but insisted that Jesus Christ had 

26 



302 



GNOSTICS. 



fntiraated tliem in parables to such as could understand 
tliem. They built their theology not only on the Gospels 
and the epistles of St. Paul, but also on the law of Mosea 
and the prophets. These last were peculiarly serviceable 
to them, on account of the allegories and allusions with 
which they abound, which are capable of different inter- 
pretations, though, their doctrine concerning the creation 
of the world by one or more inferior beings of an evil or 
imperfect nature, led them to deny the divine authority of 
the books of the Old Testament, which contradicted this 
idle fiction, and filled them with an abhorrence of Moses 
and the religion he taught ; alleging that he was actuated 
by the malignant author of this world, who consulted his 
own glory and authority, and not the real advantage of 
men. Their persuasion that evil resided in matter, as its 
centre and source, made them treat the body with contempt, 
discourage marriage, and reject the doctrine of the resur- 
rection of the body, and its reunion with the immortal 
spirit. Their notion that malevolent genii presided in 
nature, and occasioned diseases and calamities, wars and 
desolations, induced them to apply themselves to the study 
of magic, in order to weaken the powers, or suspend the 
influence of these malignant agents. The Gnostics con- 
sidered Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and inferior to the 
Father, who came into the world for the rescue and hap- 
piness of miserable mortals, oppressed by matter and evil 
beings ; but they rejected our Lord's humanity, on the 
principle that everything corporeal is essentially and in- 
trinsically evil; and therefore the greatest part of them 
denied the reality of his sufferings. They set a great value 
on the beginning of the Gospel of St. John, where they 
fancied they saw a great deal of their aeons, or emanations, 
under the terms, the word^ the life, the light, ko. They 
divided all nature into three kinds of beings, viz. : hylio. 



GNOSTICS. 



303 



or material; "psychic, or animal; and pneumatic^ or spi- 
ritual. On tlie like principle they also distinguislied three 
sorts of men ; material^ animal, and spiritual. The first, 
who were material, and incapable of knowledge, inevitably 
perished, both soul and body ; the third, such as the 
Gnostics themselves pretended to be, were all certainly 
saved ; the psychic, or animal, who were the middle 
between the other two, were capable either of being saved 
or damned, according to their good or evil actions. With 
regard to their moral doctrines and conduct, they were 
much divided. The greatest part of this sect adopted very 
austere rules of life, recommended rigorous abstinence, and 
prescribed severe bodily mortifications, with a view of 
purifying and exalting the mind. However, some main- 
tained that there was no moral difference in human actions ; 
and thus confounding right with wrong, they gave a loose 
rein to all the passions, and asserted the innocence of foh 
lowing blindly all their motions, and of living by their 
tumultuous dictates. They supported their opinions and 
practice by various authorities ; some referred to fictitious 
and apocryphal writings of Adam, Abraham, Zoroaster, 
Christ, and his apostles ; others boasted that they had 
deduced their sentiments from secret doctrines of Christ, 
concealed from the vulgar ; others affirmed that they 
arrived at superior degrees of wisdom by an innate vigor 
of mind ; and others asserted that they were instructed in 
these mysterious parts of theological science by Theudas, 
a disciple of St. Paul, and by Matthias, one of the friends 
of our Lord. The tenets of the ancient Gnostics were 
revived in Spain, in the fourth century, by a sect called 
the Priscillianists. At length the name Cfnostie, which 
originally was glorious, became infamous, by the idle 
opinions and dissolute lives of the persons who bore it. 



304 



HUSSITES. 



HUSSITES, 

A PARTY of reformers, the followers of John Huss. — John 
Huss. from whom the Hussites take their name, was born 
in a little village in Bohemia, called Huss, and lived at 
Prague in the highest reputation, both on account of the 
sanctity of his manners and the purity of his doctrine. 
He was distinguished by his uncommon erudition and elo- 
quence ; and performed at the same time the functions of 
professor of divinity in the university, and of ordinary 
pastor in the church of that city. He adopted the senti 
ments of WickliiOfe and the Waldenses ; and, in the year 
1407, began openly to oppose and preach against divers 
errors in doctrine, as well as corruptions in point of disci- 
pline, then reigning in the Church. Huss likewise endea 
vored to the utmost of his power to withdraw the univer- 
sity of Prague from the jurisdiction of Gregory XII., 
whom the king of Bohemia had hitherto acknowledged as 
the true and lawful head of the Church. This occasioned 
a violent quarrel between the incensed Archbishop of 
Prague and the zealous Reformer, which the latter inflamed 
and augmented from day to day, by his pathetic exclama- 
tions against the court of Rome, and the corruption that 
prevailed among the sacerdotal order. 

There were other circumstances that contributed to 
inflame the resentment of the clergy against him. He 
adopted the philosophical opinions of the Realists, and* 
vehemently opposed and even persecuted the Nominalists, 
whose number and influence were considerable in the Uni- 
versity of Prague. He also multiplied the number of his 
enemies in the year 1408, by procuring through his own 



nU SSITES. 



305 



credit, a sentence in favor of the Bohemians, who disputed 
with the Germans concerning the number of suffrages 
which their respective nations were entitled to in all mat- 
ters that were carried by election in this university. In 
consequence of a decree obtained in favor of the former, 
which restored them to their constitutional right of three 
suffrages, usurped by the latter, the Germans withdrew 
from Prague, and in the year 1409, founded a new aca- 
demy at Leipsic. This event no sooner happened than 
Huss began to inveigh, with greater freedom than he had 
done before, against the vices and corruptions of the 
clergy ; and to recommend in a public manner the writings 
and opinions of Wickliffe, as far as they related to tho 
papal hierarchy, the despotism of the court of Rome, and 
the corruption of the clergy. Hence, an accusation was 
brought against him, in the year 1410, before the tribunal 
of John XXIII., by whom he was solemnly expelled from 
the communion of the Church. Notwithstanding this sen- 
tence of excommunication, he proceeded to expose the 
Komish Church with a fortitude and zeal that were almost 
universally applauded. 

This eminent man, whose piety was equally sincere and 
fervent, though his zeal was perhaps too violent, and his 
prudence not always circumspect, was summoned to appear 
before the Council of Constance. Secured, as he thought 
from the rage of his enemies by the safe-conduct granted 
him by the Emperor Sigismund for his journey to Con- 
stance, his residence in that place, and his return to his 
own country, John Huss obeyed the order of the Council, 
and appeared before it to demonstrate his innocence, and 
to prove that the charge of his having deserted the Church 
of Rome was entirely groundless. How^ever, his enemies 
so far prevailed, that by the most scandalous breach of 
public faith, he was cast into prison, declared a heretic, 

26* U 



306 



HUSSITES. 



because lie refused to plead guilty against tlie dictates of 
his conscience^ in obedience to the Council, and burnt alive 
in 1415 ; a punishment which he endured with unparalleled 
magnanimity and resolution. When he came to the place 
of execution, he fell on his knees, sang portions of psalms, 
looked steadfastly towards heaven, and repeated these 
words : " Into Thy hands, Lord, do I commit my spirit ; 
Thou hast redeemed me, most good and faithful God. 
Lord Jesus Christ assist and help me, that with a firm and 
present mmd, by Thy most powerful grace I may undergo 
this most cruel and ignominious death, to which I am con- 
demned for preaching the truth of Thy most holy gospel.** 
When the chain was put upon him at the stake, he said, 
with a smiling countenance, " My Lord Jesus Christ was 
bound with a harder chain than this for my sake, and why 
should I be ashamed of this old rusty one ?" When the 
fagots were piled up to his very neck, the Duko of Bava- 
ria was officious enough to desire him to abjure. "No," 
says Huss, ''I never preached any doctrine of an evil ten- 
dency ; and what I taught with my lips I seal with my 
blood." He said to the executioner, "Are you going to 
burn a goose ? In one century you will have a swan you 
can neither roast nor boil." If he were prophetic, he must 
have meant Luther, who had a swan for his arms. The 
fire was then applied to the fagots ; when the martyr sang 
a hymn, with so loud and cheerful a voice, that he was 
heard through all the cracklings of the combustibles and 
the noise of the multitude. At last his voice was cut short, 
after he had uttered, " Jesus Christ, thou Son of the living 
God, have mercy upon me," and he was consumed in a 
most miserable manner. The Duke of Bavaria ordered 
the executioner to throw all the martyr's clothes into the 
flames ; after which his ashes were carefully collected, aud 
cast into the Rhine. 



HUTCHINSONIANS. 



307 



But the cause in which this eminent man was engaged 
did not die with him. His disciples adhered to their 
" master's doctrines after his death, which broke out into an 
open war. John Ziska, a Bohemian knight, in 1420, put 
himself at the head of the Hussites, who were now become 
a very considerable party, and threw off the despotic yoke 
of Sigismund, who had treated their brethren in the most 
barbarous manner. Ziska was succeded by Procopius, in 
the year 1424. Acts of barbarity were committed on both 
sides ; for, notwithstanding the irreconcilable opposition 
between the religious sentiments of the contendiDg parties, 
they both agreed in this one horrible principle, that it was 
mnocent and lawful to persecute and extirpate with fire 
and sword the enemies of the true religion ; and such they 
reciprocally appeared to each other. These commotions 
in a great measure subsided by the interference of the 
Council of Basil, in the year 1433. 

The Hussites, who were divided into two parties, viz. 
the Calixtines and the Taborites, spread over all Bohemia 
and Hungary, and even Silesia and Poland; and there are, 
it is said, some remains of them still subsisting in those 
parts. 



HUTCHINSONIANS. 

HUTCHINSONIANS, the followers of John Hutchinson, 
who was born in Yorkshire, in 1674. In the early part 
of his life he served the Duke of Somerset in the capacity 
of steward ; and in the course of his travels from place to 
place, employed himself in collecting fossils. We are told 
that the large and noble collection bequeathed by Dr. 
Woodward to the University of Cambridge was actually 



308 



HUTCHINSONIANS. 



made by him, and even unfairly obtained from him. In 
1724, he published the first part of his curious book, called 
Moses' Principia, in which he ridiculed Dr. Woodward's 
Natural History of the Earth, and exploded the doctrine 
of gravitation established in Newton's Principia. In 1727, 
he published a second part of Moses' Principia, containing 
the principles of the Scripture philosophy. From this 
time to his death, he published a volume every year or 
two, which, with the manuscripts he left behind, were 
published in 1748, in 12 volumes, Bvo. On the/Monday 
before his death. Dr. Mead urged him to be bled ; saying, 
pleasantly, " I will soon send you to Moses," mt^aning his 
studies ; but Mr. Hutchinson, taking it in the literal sense, 
answered, in a muttering tone, " I believe, doctor, you 
will;" and was so displeased, that he dismissed him for 
another physician ; but he died in a few days after, 
August 28, 1737. 

It appears to be a leading sentiment of this denomina- 
tion, that all our ideas of divinity are formed from the 
ideas in nature, — that nature is a standing picture, and 
Scripture an application of the several parts of the picture, 
to draw out to, as the great things of God, in order to 
reform our mental conceptions. To prove this point, they 
allege that the Scriptures declare the invisible things of 
Grod from the formation of the world are clearly seen, 
being understood by the things which are made; even his 
eternal j^ower and Godhead, (Rom. i. 20). The heavens 
must declare God's righteousness and truth in the congre" 
gation of the saints, (Pa. Ixxxix. 5.) And, in short, the 
whole system of nature, in one voice of analogy, declares 
and gives us ideas of his glory, and shows us his handiwork. 
We cannot have any ideas of invisible things till they are 
pointed out to us by revelation ; and as we cannot know 
them immediately, such as they are in themselves, after 



HUTCHINSONIANS. 



309 



the manner in which we know sensible objects, they must 
be communicated to us by the mediation of such things as 
we already comprehend. For this reason the Scripture ia 
found to have a language of its own, which does not con- 
sist of words, but of signs or figures taken from visible 
things; in consequence of which, the world we now see 
becomes a sort of commentary on the mind of God, and 
explains the world in which we believe. The doctrines 
of the Christian faith are attested by the whole natural 
world ; they are recorded in a language which has never 
been confounded ; they are written in a text which shall 
never be corrupted. 

The Hutchinsonians maintain that the great mystery 
of the Trinity is conveyed to our understanding by ideas 
of sense ; and that the created substance of the air, or 
heaven, in its threefold agency of fire, light, and spirit, is 
the enigma of the one essence or one Jehovah in three 
persons. The unity of essence is exhibited by its unity of 
substance ; the trinity, of conditions, fire, light, and spirit. 
Thus the one substance of the air, or heaven, in its three 
conditions, shows the unity in trinity ; and its three con- 
ditions in or of one substance, the trinity in unity. For 
(says this denomination) if we consult the WTitings of the 
Old and New Testament, we shall find the persons of the 
Deity represented under the names and characters of the 
three material agents, fire, light, and spirit, and their 
actions expressed by the actions of these their emblems. 
The Father is called a consuming fire ; and his judicial 
proceedings are spoken of in words which denote the 
several actions of fire. Jehovah is a consuming fire ; our 
God is a consuming fire, (Deut. iv. 24 ; Heb. xii. 29). 
The Son has the name of light, and his purifying actions 
and offices are described by words which denote the actions 
and offices of light. Me is the true light, which lighteth 



310 



HUTCHINSONIANS. 



every man that cometJi into the world, (John i. 9 ; Mai. iv. 2). 
The Comforter has the name of Spirit ; and his animating 
and sustaining offices are described by words, for the 
actions and offices of the material spirit. His actions in 
the spiritual economy are agreeable to his type in the 
natural economy ; such as inspiring, impelling, driving, 
leading, (Matt. ii. 1). The philosophic system of the 
Hutchinsonians is derived from the Hebrew Scriptures. 
The truth of it rests on these suppositions : 1. That the 
Hebrew language was formed under Divine inspiration, 
either all at once, or at different times, as occasion re- 
quired ; and that the Divine Being had a view in construct- 
ing it, to the various revelations which he in all succeeding 
times should make in that language ; consequently, that its 
words must be the most proper and determinate to convey 
such truths as the Deity, during the Old Testament dis- 
pensation, thought fit to make known to the sons of men. 
Further than this, that the inspired penmen of those ages 
at least were under the guidance of heaven in the choice 
of words for recording what was revealed to them : there- 
fore, that the Old Testament, if the language be rightly 
understood, is the most determinate in its meaning of any 
other book under heaven. 2. That whatever is recorded 
in the Old Testament is strictly and literally true, allowing 
only for a few common figures of rhetoric ; that nothing 
contrary to truth is accommodated to vulgar apprehensions. 

In proof of this, the Hutchinsonians argue in this manner. 
The primary and ultimate design of revelation is indeed 
to teach men divinity ; but in subserviency to that, geo- 
graphy, history, and chronology, are occasionally intro- 
duced; all which are allowed to be just and authentic. 
There are also innumerable references to things of nature, 
and descriptions of them. If, then, the former are just, 
and to be depended on, for the same reason the latter 



HUTCHiNSONIANS. 



311 



onght to be esteemed philosophically true. Further, tliey 
think it not unworthy of God, that he should make it a 
secondary end of his revelation to unfold the secrets of his 
works ; as the primary was to make known the mysteries 
of his nature, and the designs of his grace, that men might 
thereby be led to admire and adore the wisdom and good- 
ness which the great Author of the universe has displayed 
throughout all his works. And as our minds are often 
referred to natural things for ideas of spiritual truths, it 
s of great importance, in order to conceive aright of divine 
matters, that our ideas of the natural things referred to bo 
strictly just and true. 

Mr. Hutchinson found that the Hebrew Scriptures had 
some capital words, which he thought had not been duly 
considered and understood ; and which, he has endeavored 
tQ prove, contain in their radical meaning the greatest and 
most comfortable truths. The cherubim he explains to be 
a hieroglyphic of Divine construction, or a sacred image, 
to describe, as far as figures could go, the humanity united 
to Deity ; and so he treats of several other words of similar 
import. From all which he concluded, that the rites and 
ceremonies of the Jewish dispensation were so many de- 
lineations of Christ, in what he was to be, to do, and to 
suffer ; that the early Jews knew them to be types of his 
actions and sufferings ; and, by performing them as such, 
were so far Christians both in faith and practice. 

The Hutchinsonians have, for the most part, been men 
of devout minds, zealous in the cause of Christianity, and 
untainted with heterodox opinions, which have so often 
divided the church of Christ. The names of Eomaine, 
Bishop Horne, Parkhurst, and others of this denomination, 
will be long esteemed, both for the piety they possessed, 
and the good they have been the instruments of promoting 
amongst mankind. 



312 



ICONOCLASTES. 



ICONOCLASTES. 

IcoNOCLASTES, 01 Iconockstse, breakers of images — a 
name wiiich the Church of Rome gives to all who reject 
the use of images in religious matters. The word is Greek, 
formed from gixwv, image^ and xXatrTSiv, rumpere, *'to 
break." In this sense not only the reformed, but some of 
the eastern churches, are called iconoelastes, and esteemed 
by them heretics, as opposing the worship of the images 
of God and the saints, and breaking their figures and 
representations in churches. 

The opposition to images began in Greece, under the 
reign of Bardanes, who was created emperor of the Greeks 
a little after the commencement of the eighth century, 
when the worship of them became common. But the tu- 
mults occasioned by it were quelled by a revolution, which, 
in 713, deprived Bardanes of the imperial throne. The 
dispute, however, broke out with redoubled fury under Leo 
the Isaurian, who issued an edict in the year 726, abro 
gating, as some say, the worship of images ; and ordering 
all the images, except that of Christ's crucifixion, to be 
removed out of the churches ; but, according to others 
this edict only prohibited the paying to them any kind of 
adoration or worship. This edict occasioned a civil war, 
which broke out in the islands of the Archipelago, and, by 
the suggestions of the priests and monks, ravaged a part 
of Asia, and afterwards reached Italy. The civil commo- 
tions and insurrections in Italy were chiefly promoted by 
the Roman pontiffs, Gregory I. and II. Leo was excom- 
municated ; and his subjects in the Italian provinces vio- 
lated their allegiance, and rising in arms, either massacrei^ 



ICONOCLASTES. 



313 



bAiIshed all the emperor's deputies and officers. la 
consequence of these proceedings, Leo assembled a council 
at Constantinople in 730, which degraded Germanus, 
bishop of that city, who was a patron of images ; and he 
ordered all the images to be publicly burnt, and inflicted a 
variety of punishments upon such as were attached to that 
idolatrous worship. Hence arose two factions, one of 
which adopted the adoration and worship of images, and 
on that account was called iconoduU ox iconolatrse ; and 
the other maintained that such worship was unlawful, and 
that nothing was more worthy the zeal of Christians than 
to demolish and destroy those statues and pictures which 
were the occasion of this gross idolatry ; and hence they 
were distinguished by the titles of iconomachi (from sjxwv, 
image, and ixap(w, I contend), and iconoclastse. The zeal 
of Gregory II. in favor of image worship was not only 
imitated, but even surpassed, by his successor, Gregory 
III- ; in consequence of which the Italian provinces were 
torn from the Grecian empire. Constantino, called Co- 
pronymus, in 764 convened a council at Constantinople, 
regarded by the Greeks as the seventh oecumenical coun- 
cil, which solemnly condemned the worship and usage of 
images. Those who, notwithstanding the decree of the 
council, raised commotions in the state, were severely pun- 
ished, and new laws were enacted to set bounds to the vio- 
lence of monastic rage. Leo lY., who was declared em- 
peror in 755, pursued the same measures, and had recourse 
to the coercive influence of penal laws, in order to extir- 
pate idolatry out of the Christian Church. Irene, the 
wife of Leo, poisoned her husband in 780 ; assumed the 
reins of the empire during the minority of her son Con- 
stantino ; and in 786 summoned a council at Nice, in Bi- 
thynia, known by the name of the Second Nicene Oouncily 
which abrogated the laws and decrees against the new idol- 

27 



311 



ICONOCLAST ES. 



atry, restored the worship of images and of the cross, and 
denounced severe punishments against those who main- 
tained that God was the only object of religious adoration. 
In this contest the Britons, Germans, and Gauls were of 
opinion that images might be lawfully continued in 
churches ; but they considered the worship of them as 
highly injurious, and offensive to the Supreme Being. 
Charlemagne distinguished himself as a mediator in this 
controversy ; he ordered four books concerning images to 
be composed, refuting the reasons urged by the Nicene 
bishops to justify the worship of images, which he sent to 
Adrian, the Roman pontiff, in 790, in order to engage him 
to withdraw his approbation of the decrees of the last 
Council of Nice. Adrian wrote an answer ; and in 794, a 
council of 300 bishops, assembled by Charlemagne at 
Frankfort-on-the-Maine, confirmed the opinion contained 
in the four books, and solemnly condemned the worship of 
images. 

In the Greek Church, after the banishment of Irene, 
the controversy concerning images broke out anew, and 
was carried on by the contending parties, during the half 
of the ninth century, with various and uncertain success. 
The Emperor Nicephorus appears, upon the whole, to have 
been an enemy to this idolatrous worship. His successor, 
Michael Curopalates, surnamed Rhangahe, patronized and 
encouraged it. But the scene changed on the accession of 
Leo, the Armenian, to the empire, who assembled a council 
at Constantinople, in 812, that abolished the decrees of 
the Nicene Council. His successor Michael, surnamed 
Balhus, disapproved of the worship of images, and his son 
Theophilus treated them with great severity. However, 
the Empress Theodora, after his death, and during the 
minority of her son, assembled a council at Constantinople 
in 842, which reinstated the decrees of the Second Nicene 



ICONOCLASTES. 



315 



Council, and encouraged image worship by a law. The 
council held at the same place under Protius, in 879, and 
reckoned bj the Greeks the eighth general council, con- 
firmed and renewed the Nicene decrees. In commemora- 
tion of this council, a festival was instituted by the super- 
stitious Greeks, called the Feast of Orthodoxy. The 
Latins were generally of opinion that images might be 
suffered, as the means of aiding the memory of the faith- 
ful, and of calling to their remembrance the pious exploits 
and virtuous actions of the persons whom they represented; 
but they detested all thoughts of paying them the least 
marks of religious homage or adoration. The Council of 
Paris, assembled in 824 by Louis the Meek, resolved to 
allow the use of images in the churches, but severely pro- 
hibited rendering them religious worship ; nevertheless, 
towards the conclusion of this century, the Galilean clergy 
began to pay a kind of religious homage to the images of 
saints, and their example was followed by the Germans 
and other nations. However, the Iconoclastes still had 
their adherents among the Latins ; the most eminent of 
whom was Claudius, Bishop of Turin, who, in 823, ordered 
all images, and even the cross, to be cast out of the 
churches, and committed to the flames; and he wrote a 
treatise, in which he declared both against the use and 
worship of them. He condemned relics, pilgrimages to the 
Holy Land, and all voyages to the tombs of saints ; and 
to his writings and labors it was owing that the city of 
Turin, and the adjacent country, was for a long time after 
his death much less infected with superstition than the 
other parts of Europe. The controversy concerning the 
sanctity of images was again revived by Leo, Bishop of 
Chalcedon, in the 11th century, on occasion of the Empe- 
ror Alexius's converting the figures of silver that adorned 
the portals of the churches into money, in order to supply 



316 



WICKLIFFITES. 



the exigencies of the state. The bishop obstinately main- 
tained that he had been guilty of sacrilege, and published 
a treatise, in which he affirmed that in these images there 
resided an inherent sanctity, and that the adoration of 
Christians ought not to be confined to the persons repre- 
sented by these images, but extend to the images them- 
selves. The emperor assembled a council at Constantino- 
ple, which determined that the images of Christ and of 
the saints were to be honored only with a relative wor- 
ship ; and that the invocation and worship were to be ad- 
dressed to the saints only, as the servants of Christ, and 
on account of their relation to him as their master. Leo, 
dissatisfied with these absurd and superstitious decisions, 
was sent into banishment. In the western church, the 
worship of images was disapproved, and opposed by seve- 
ral considerable parties, as the Petrobrussians, Albigenses, 
Waldenses, etc. ; till at length this idolatrous practice was 
abolished in many parts of the Christian world by the 
Reformation. 



WICKLIFFITES, 

Ihe followers of the famous John Wicklifie, called "the 
first reformer," who was born in Yorkshire in the year 
1324. He attacked the jurisdiction of the pope and the 
bishops. He was for this summoned to a council at Lam- 
beth, to give an account of his doctrines : but being coun- 
tenanced by the duke of Lancaster, was both times dis- 
missed without condemnation. Wicklifie, therefore, con- 
tinued to spread his new principles as usual, adding to them 
doctrines still more alarming ; by which he drew after him 



WILKINSON lANS. 



317 



a great number of disciples. Upon this, William Courtnay, 
archbishop of Canterbury, called another council in 1382, 
which condemned twenty-four propositions of Wickliffe and 
his disciples, and obtained a declaration of Richard II. 
against all who should preach them ; but while these pro- 
ceedings were agitating, Wickliffe died at Lutterworth, 
leaving many works behind him for tho establishment of his 
doctrines. He was buried in his own church at Lutter- 
worth, in Leicestershire, where his bones were suffered to 
rest in peace till the year 1428, when by an order from the 
pope, they were taken up and burnt. Wickliffe was doubt- 
less a very extraordinary man, considering the times ir 
which he lived. He discovered the absurdities and impo 
sitions of the church of Eome, and had the honesty and re- 
solution to promulgate his opinions, which a little more 
support would probably have enabled him to establish; 
they were evidently the foundation of the subsequent. 
Reformation. 



WILKINSONIANS, 

The followers of Jemima Wilkinson, who was born m Cum- 
berland, R. 1. In October, 1776, she asserted that she was 
taken sick, and actually died, and that her soul went to hea- 
ven, where it still continues. Soon after her body was re- 
animated with the spirit and power of Christ, upon which she 
Bet up as a public tea cher ; and declared she had an imme- 
diate revelation for all she delivered, and was arrived to a 
state of absolute perfection. It is also said she pretended 
to foretell future events, to discern the secrets of the heart, 
and to have the power of healing diseases ; and if any per- 

27* 



318 



W ALD E N S E S. 



son who had made application to her was not healed, she 
attributed it to his want of faith. She asserted that those 
- who refused to believe these exalted things concerning her, 
will be in the state of the unbelieving Jews, who rejected 
the counsel of God against themselves ; and she told her 
hearers that was the eleventh hour, and the last call of 
mercy that ever should be granted them : for she heard an 
inquiry in heaven, saying, Who will go and preach to a 
dying world ?" or words to that import ; and she said she 
answered, " Here am I — send me ;" and that she left the 
realms of light and glory, and the company of the heavenly 
host, who are continually praising and worshipping God, 
in order to descend upon earth, and pass through many 
sufferings and trials for the happiness of mankind. She 
assumed the title of the universal friend of mankind ; hence 
her followers distinguish themselves by the name of Friends 



WALDENSES, 

Or Valdenses, a sect of reformers, who made their first 
appearance about the year 1160. They were most nume- 
rous about the valleys of Piedmont ; and hence, some say, 
they were called Valdenses, or Yaudois, and not from Peter 
Valdo, as others suppose. Mosheim, however, gives this 
account of them : he says, that Peter, an opulent merchj'^t 
of Lyons, surnamed Valdensis, or Validisius, from Vaux, 
or Waldum, a town in the marquisate of LyonSy being ex- 
tremely zealous for the advancement of true piety and 
Christian knowledge, employed a certain priest, called 
Stephanus de ^visa, about the year 1160, in translating, 
from Latin into French, the four Gospels, with other bookti 



W ALD EN SES. 



319 



of holy Scripture, and the most remarkable sentences of 
the ancient doctors, which were so highly esteemed in this 
century. But no sooner had he perused these sacred hooka 
with a proper degree of attention, than he perceived that 
the religion which was now taught in the Roman church 
differed totally from that which was originally inculcated 
by Christ and his apostles. Struck with this glaring con- 
tradiction between the doctrines of the pontiffs and the 
truths of the Gospel, and animated with zeal, he abandoned 
his mercantile vocation, distributed his riches among the 
poor (whence the Waldenses were called poor men of Lyons), 
and, forming an association with other pious men, who had 
adopted his sentiments and his turn of devotion, he began, 
in the year 1180, to assume the quality of a public teacher, 
and to instruct the multitude in the doctrines and precepts 
of Christianity. 

Soon after Peter had assumed the exercise of his min- 
istry, the archbishop of Lyons, and the other rulers of the 
church in that province, vigorously opposed him. How- 
ever, their opposition was unsuccessful ; for the purity and 
simplicity of that religion which these good men taught, 
the spotless innocence that shone forth in their lives and 
actions, and the noble contempt of riches and honors which 
was conspicuous in the whole of their conduct and conver- 
sation, appeared so engaging to all such as had auy sense 
of true piety, that the number of their followers daily in- 
creased. They accordingly formed religious assemblies, 
first in France, and afterwards in Lombardy ; from whence 
they propagated their sect throughout the other province? 
of Europe with incredible rapidity, and with such invinci- 
ble fortitude, that neither fire nor sword, nor the most 
cruel inventions of merciless persecution, could damp their 
zeal, or entirely ruin their cause. 

The attempts of Peter Waldus and his followers were 



320 



WALDENSES. 



neither emplc/ed nor designed to introduce new doctrines 
into the charch, nor to propose new articles of faith to 
Christians All they aimed at was, to reduce the form 
of ecclesiastical government, and the manners both of the 
clergy and people, to that amiable simplicity and primitive 
sanctity that characterized the apostolic ages, and which 
appear so strongly recommended in the precepts and in- 
junctions of the Divine Author of our holy religion. In 
consequence of this design, they complained that the Roman 
church had degenerated, under Constantino the Great, from 
its primitive purity and sanctity. They denied the supre- 
macy of the Roman pontiiF, and maintained that the rulers 
and ministers of the church were obliged, by their vocation, 
to imitate the poverty of the apostles, and to procure for 
themselves a subsistence by the work of their hands. They 
considered every Christian as, in a certain measure, quali- 
fied and authorized to instruct, exhort, and confirm the 
brethren in their Christian course ; and demanded the res- 
toration of the ancient penitential discipline of the church, 
i. e., the expiation of transgressions by prayer, fasting, and 
alms, which the newly-invented doctrine of indulgences had 
almost totally abolished. They at the same time affirmed 
that every pious Christian was qualified and entitled to 
prescribe to the penitent the kind or degree of satisfaction 
or expiation that their transgressions required ; that con- 
fession made to priests was by no means necessary, since 
the humble offender might acknowledge his sins and testify 
his repentance to any true believer, and might expect from 
Buch the counsel and admonition which his case demanded. 
They maintained that the power of delivering sinners from 
the guilt and punishment of their ofiences belonged to God 
alone ; and that indulgences, of consequence, were the 
criminal inventions of sordid avarice. They looked upon 
the prayers and other ceremonies that were instituted in 



WALDENSES. 



821 



behalf of the dead, as vain, useless, and absurd, and denied 
the existence of departed souls in an intermediate state of 
purification ; affirming that thej were immediately, upon 
their separation from the body, received into heaven, or 
thrust down to hell. These and other tenets of a like na- 
ture, composed the system of doctrine propagated by the 
Waldenses. It is evident that the ancient Waldenses 
denied the obligation of infant baptism, and that others 
rejected water baptism entirely ; but Wall has labored to 
prove that infant baptism was generally practised am^ong 
them. 

Their rules of practice were extremely austere ; for they 
adopted as the model of their moral discipline the sermon 
of Christ on the mount, which they interpreted and ex- 
plained in the most rigorous and literal manner ; and con- 
sequently prohibited and condemned in their society all 
wars, and suits of law, and all attempts towards the acqui- 
Bition of wealth ; the inflicting of capital punishments, self- 
defence against unjust violence, and oaths of all kinds. 

During the greatest part of the seventeenth century, 
those of them who lived in the valleys of Piedmont, and 
who had embraced the doctrine, discipline, and worship of 
the church of Geneva, were oppressed and persecuted in 
the most barbarous and inhuman manner by the ministers 
of Rome. This persecution was carried on with peculiar 
marks of rage and enormity in the years 1655, 1656, and 
1696, and seemed to portend nothing less than the total 
extinction of that unhappy nation. The most horrid ecenea 
of violence and bloodshed were exhibited in this theatre 
of papal tyranny ; and the few Waldenses ths t survived 
were indebted for their existence and support to the inter- 
cession made for them by the English and Dutch govern- 
ments, and also by the Swiss cantons, who solicited the 
clemency of the duke of Savoy on their behalf. 

V 



322 



GREEK CHURCH. 



GKEEK CHURCH. 

The Greek Church comprehends in its bosom a con 
siderable part of Greece, the Grecian Isles, Wallachia, 
Moldavia, Egypt, Abyssinia, Nubia, Libya, Arabia, Meso- 
potamia, Syria, Cilic.'a, and Palestine, which are all under 
the jurisdiction of the patriarchs of Constantinople, Alex- 
andria, Antioch, and Jerusalem. If to these we add the 
whole of the Russian empire ii Europe, great part of 
Siberia in Asia, Astracan, Casan, and Georgia, it will be 
evident that the Greek church has a wider extent of terri- 
tory than the Latin, with all the branches which have 
sprung from it ; and that it is with great impropriety that 
the church of Rome is called by her members the catholic 
or universal church. That in these widely distant coun- 
tries the professors of Christianity are agreed in every 
minute article of belief, it would be rash to assert ; but 
there is certainly such an agreement among them, with 
respect both to faith and to discipline, that they mutually 
hold communion with each other, and are, in fact, but one 
church. It is called the Greek church, in contradistinction 
to the Latin or Roman church ; as also the Eastern, in 
distinction from the Western church. We shall here pre- 
sent the reader with a view of its rise, tenets, and discipline. 

The Greek church is considered as a separation from 
the Latin. In the middle of the ninth century, the con- 
troversy relating to the procession of the Holy Ghost 
(which had been started in the sixth century) became a 
point of great importance, on account of the jealousy and 
ambition which were at that time blended with it. Photius, 
the patriarch of Constantinople, being advanced to that 
«ee in the room of Ignatius, whom he procured to be 



GREEK CHURCn. 



323 



deposed, was solemnly excluded by pope Nicholas, m a 
council held at Rome, and his ordination declared null and 
void The Greek emperor resented this conduct of the 
pope, who defended himself with great spirit and resolu- 
tion. Photius, in his turn, convened what he called an 
oecumenical council, in which he pronounced sentence of 
excommunication and deposition against the pope, and got 
it subscribed by twenty-one bishops and others, amounting 
m number to a thousand. This occasioned a wide breach 
between the sees of Rome and Constantinople. However, 
the death of the emper )r Michael, and the deposition of 
Photius, subsequent th'jreupon, seemed to have restored 
peace ; for the emperor Basil held a council at Constanti- 
nople in the year 869, in which entire satisfaction was 
given to pope Adrian ; but the schism was only smothered 
and suppressed a while. The Greek church had several 
complaints against the Latin ; particularly it was thought 
a great hardship for the Greeks to subscribe to the defini- 
tion of a council according to the Roman form, prescribed 
by the pope, since it made the church of Constantinople 
dependent on that of Rome, and set the pope above an 
oecumenical council ; but, above all, the pride and haughti- 
ness of the Roman court gave the Greeks a great distaste ; 
and as their deportment seemed to insult his imperial 
majesty, it entirely alienated the affections of the emperor 
Basil. Towards the middle of the eleventh century, 
Michael Cerularius, patriarch of Constantinople, opposed 
the Latins with respect to their making use of unleavened 
bread in the eucharist, their observation of the Sabbath, 
and fasting on Saturdays, charging them with living in 
communion with the Jews. To this, pope Leo IX. replied, 
and, in his apology for the Latins, declaimed very warmly 
agiiinst the false doctrine of the Greeks, interposing, 
at the same time, the authority of his see. He likewise, 



324 



GREEK CnUHCH. 



by his legates, excommunicated the patriarch in the church 
of Santa Sophia, which gave the last shock to the recon- 
ciliation attempted a long time after, but to no purpose ; 
for from that time the hatred of the Greeks to the Latins, 
and of the Latins to the Greeks, became insuperable, inso- 
much that they have continued ever since separated from 
each other's communion. 

The following are some of the chief tenets held by the 
Greek church : — They disown the authority of the pope, 
and deny that the church of Rome is the true catholic 
church. They do not baptize their children till they are 
three, four, five, six, ten, nay, sometimes eighteen years 
of age : baptism is performed by trine immersion. They 
insist that the sacrament of the Lord's Supper ought to 
be administered in both kinds, and they give the sacrament 
to children immediately after baptism. They grant no 
indulgences, nor do they lay any claim to the character 
of infallibility, like the church of Rome. They deny that 
there is any such place as purgatory ; notwithstanding 
they pray for the dead, that God would have mercy on 
them at the general judgment. They practise the invo- 
cation of saints ; though, they say, they do not invoke 
them as deities, but as intercessors with God. They 
exclude confirmation, extreme unction, and matrimony, 
out of the seven sacraments. They deny auricular con- 
fession to be a Divine precept, and say it is only it positive 
injunction of the church. They pay no religious homage 
to the eucharist. They administer the communion in both 
kinds to the laity, both in sickness and in health, though 
they have never applied themselves to their confessors; 
because they are persuaded that a lively faith is all which 
is requisite for the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper. 
They maintain that the Holy Ghost proceeds only from 
the Father, and not from the Son. They believe in pre- 



GREEK CHURCH. 



325 



destination. They admit of no images in relief or embossed 
work, but use paintings and sculptures in copper or silver. 
They approve of the marriage of priests, provided they 
enter into that state before their admission into holy 
orders. They condemn all fourth marriages. They ob- 
serve a number of holy days, and keep four fasts in the 
year moire solemn than the rest, of which the fast in Lent, 
before Easter, is the chief. They believe the doctrine of 
consubstantiation, or the union of the body of Christ with 
the sacramental bread. 

Since the Greeks became subject to the Turkish yoke, 
they have sunk into the most deplorable ignorance, in 
consequence of the slavery and thraldom under which 
they groan ; and their religion is now greatly corrupted 
[t is, indeed, little better than a heap of ridiculous cere- 
monies and absurdities. The head of the Greek church is 
the patriarch of Constantinople, who is chosen by the 
neighboring archbishops and metropolitans, and confirmed 
by the emperor or grand vizier. He is a person of great 
dignity, being the head and director of the Eastern church. 
The other patriarchs are those of Jerusalem, Antioch, and 
Alexandria. Mr. Tournefort tells us that the patriarchates 
are now generally set to sale and bestowed upon those 
who are the highest bidders. The patriarchs, metropoli- 
tans, archbishops, and bishops, are always chosen from 
among the caloyers, or Greek monks. The next person 
to a bishop, among the clergy, is an archimandrite, who ia 
the director of one or more convents, which are called 
mandren ; then come the abbot, the arch-priest, the priest, 
the deacon, the under-deacon, the chanter, and the lec- 
turer. The secular clergy are subject to no rules, and 
never rise higher than high-priest. The Greeks have few 
nunneries, but a great many convents of monks, who are 

28 



326 



MAHOMET A NISM. 



all priests, and (students excepted) obliged to follow some 
handicraft employment, and lead a very austere life. 

The Russians adhere to the doctrine and ceremonies of 
the Greek church, though they are now independent of 
the patriarch of Constantinople. The Russian church, 
indeed, may be reckoned the first, as to extent of empire ; 
yet there is very little of the power of vital religion among 
them. The BosJcolniJci, or, as they now call themselves, 
the Starovertziy were a sect that separated from the church 
of Russia about 1666 ; they affected extraordinary piety 
and devotion, a veneration for the letter of the Holy 
Scriptures, and would not allow a priest to administer 
baptism who had that day tasted brandy. They harbored 
many follies and superstitions, and have been greatly 
persecuted ; but, perhaps, there will be found among them 
" some that shall be counted to the Lord for a generation." 
Several settlements of German Protestants have been 
established on the Wolga. The Moravians also have done 
good in Livonia, and the adjacent isles in the Baltic under 
the Russian government. 



MAHOMETANISM 

Is the system of religion formed and propagated by Ma- 
homet, and still adhered to by his followers. It is pro- 
fessed by the Turks and Persians, by several nations 
among the Africans, and many among the East Indians. 

Mahomet was born in the reign of Anushirwan the Just, 
emperor of Persia, about the end of the sixth century of 
the Christian era. He came into the world under some 
disadvantages. His father Abd'allah was a younger son 
of Abd'almotalleb ; and dying very young, and in his 



MAHOMETANISM. 



327 



father's lifetime, left his widow and infant son in very 
mean circumstances, his whole subsistence consisting but 
of five camels and one Ethiopian she-slave. Abd'almo- 
talleb was therefore obliged to take care of his grandchild 
Mahomet ; which he not only did during his life, but at his 
death enjoined his eldest son Abu Taleb, who was brother 
to Abd'allah by the same mother, to provide for him for 
the future ; which he very affectionately did, and instructed 
him in the business of a merchant, which he followed : and 
to that end he took him into Syria when he was but thir- 
teen. He afterwards recommended him to Khadijah, a 
noble and rich widow, for her factor ; in whose service he 
behaved himself so well, that, by making him her husband, 
she soon raised him to an equality with the richest in 
Mecca. 

After he began by this advantageous match to live at 
Lis ease, it was, that he formed the scheme of establishing 
a new religion, or, as he expressed it, of replanting the 
only true and ancient one, professed by Adam, Noah, 
Abraham, Moses, J esus, and all the prophets, by destroy- 
ing the gross idolatry into which the generality of his 
countrymen had fallen, and weeding out the corruptions 
and superstitions which the latter Jews and Christians had, 
as he thought, introduced into their religion, and reducing 
it to its original purity, which consisted chiefly in the wor- 
ship of one God. 

Before he made any attempt abroad, he rightly judged 
that it was necessary for him to begin with the conversion 
of his own household. Having therefore retired with his 
family, as he had done several times before, to a cave in 
Mount Hara, he there opened the secret of his mission to 
his wife Khadijah ; and acquainted her that the angel 
Gabriel had just before appeared to him, and told him that 
he was appointed the apostle of God : he also repeated to 



328 



MAHOMETANISM. 



her a passage wliich he pretended had been revealed to 
hira bj the ministry of the angel, with those other circum- 
stances of this first appearance which are related by the 
Mahometan writers. Khadijah received the news with 
great joy, swearing by Him in whose hands her soul was, 
that she trusted he would be the prophet of his nation ; 
and immediately communicated what she had heard to her 
cousin Warakah Ebn Nawfal, who, being a Christian, 
could write in the Hebrew character, and was tolerably 
well versed in the Scriptures ; and he readily came into 
her opinion, assuring her that the same angel who had 
formerly appeared unto Moses, was now sent* to Mahomet. 
The first overture the prophet made was in the month of 
Ramadan, in the fortieth year of his age, which is there- 
fore usually called the year of his mission. 

Encouraged by so good a beginning, he resolved to pro- 
ceed, and try for some time what he could do by private 
persuasion, not daring to hazard the whole afiair by expo- 
sing it too suddenly to the public. He soon made prose- 
lytes of those under his own roof, viz. his wife Khadijah, 
his servant Zeid Ebn Haretha, to whom he gave his free- 
dom on that occasion (which afterwards became a rule to 
his followers), and his cousin and pupil Ali, the son of Abu 
Taleb, though then very young ; but this last, making no 
account of the other two, used to style himself the first of 
believers. The next person Mahomet applied to was 
Abd'allah Ebn Abi Kohafa, surnamed Abu Beer, a man 
of great authority among the Koreish, and one whose inte- 
rest he well knew would be of great service to him, as it 
soon appeared ; for Abu Beer being gained over, prevailed 
also on Othman Ebn AfFan, Abd'alraham Ebn Awf, Saad 
Ebn Abbi Wakkus, At Zobeir al Awam, and Telha Ebn 
Obeidalla, all principal men of Mecca, to follow his exam- 
pie. These men were six chief companions, who, with a 



MAHOMETANISM. 



329 



Few more, were converted in the space of three years ; at 
the end of which, Mahomet having, as he hoped, a suffi- 
cient interest to support him, made his mission no longer 
a secret, but gave out that God had commanded him to 
admonish his near relations ; and in order to do it with 
more convenience and prospect of success, he directed Ali 
to prepare an entertainment, and invited the sons and de- 
scendants of Abd'almotalleb, intending then to open his 
mind to them. This was done, and about forty of them 
came ; but Abu Laheb, one of his uncles, making the com- 
pany break up before Mahomet had an opportunity of 
speaking, obliged him to give them a second invitation the 
next day ; and when they were come, he made them the 
following speech : ^' I know no man in all Arabia who can 
offer his kindred a more excellent thing than I now do to 
you : I offer you happiness, both in this life, and in that 
which is to come : God Almighty hath commanded me to 
call you unto him. Who, therefore, among you, will be 
assistant to me herein, and become my brother and my 
vicegerent?" All of them hesitating and declining the 
matter, Ali at length rose up, and declared that he would 
be his assistant, and vehemently threatened those who 
should oppose him. Mahomet upon this embraced Ali 
with great demonstrations of affection, and desired all who 
were present to hearken to and obey him as his deputy ; at 
which the company broke out into a great laughter, telling 
Abu Taleb that he must now pay obedience to his son. 

This repulse, however, was so far from discouraging 
Mahomet, that he began to preach in public to the people, 
who heard him with some patience, till he came to upbraid 
them with the idolatry, obstinacy, and perverseness of 
themselves and their fathers, v/hich so highly provoked 
them, that they declared themselves his enemies, and 
would soon have procured his ruin, had he not been pro- 

28* 



330 



MAHOMETAN ISM. 



tected by Ahu Taleb. The chief of the Ki)reish warmly 
solicited this person to desert his nephew, making frequent 
remonstrances against the innovations he was attempting; 
which proving ineffectual, they at length threatened him 
with an open rupture if he did not prevail on Mahumet to 
desist. At this Abu Taleb was so far moved that he 
earnestly dissuaded his nephew from pursuing the affair 
any further, representing the great danger that he and his 
friends must otherwise run. But Mahomet was not to be 
intimidated ; telling his uncle plainly, that if they set the 
sun against him on his right hand., and the moon on his 
left^ he would not leave his enterprise ; and Abu Taleb, 
seeing him so firmly resolved to proceed, used no further 
arguments, but promised to stand by him against all his 
enemies. 

The Koreish, finding they could prevail neither by fair 
words nor menaces, tried what they could do by force and 
ill treatment ; using Mahomet's followers so very injuri- 
ously, that it was not safe for them to continue at Mecca 
any longer ; whereupon Mahomet gave leave to such of 
them as had no friends to protect them to seek for refuge 
elsewhere. And accordingly, in the fifth year of the pro- 
phet's mission, sixteen of them, four of whom were women, 
fled into Ethiopia ; and among them Othman Ebn Affan, 
and his wife Rakiah, Mahomet's daughter. This was the 
first flight ; but afterwards several others followed them, 
retiring one after another, to the number of eighty-three 
men and eighteen women, besides children. These refu- 
gees were kindly received by the Najashi, or king of Ethio 
pia, who refused to deliver them up to those whom the 
Koreish sent to demand them, and, as the Arab writers 
unanimously attest, even professsed the Mahometan reli- 
gion. 

In the sixth year of his mission, Mahomet had the plea 



MAHOMETAN ISM. 331 

sure of seeing his party strengthened by the conversion of 
his uncle Hamza, a man of great valor and merit ; and of 
Omar Ebn al Kattab, a person highly esteemed, and once 
a violent opposer of the prophet. As persecution gene - 
rally advances rather than obstructs the spreading of a 
religion, Islamism made so great a progress among the 
Arab tribes, that the Koreish, to suppress it effectually, if 
possible, in the seventh year of Mahomet's mission, made 
a solemn league or covenant against the Hashemites and 
the family of Abd'almotalleb, engaging themselves to con- 
tract no m-arriage with any of them, and to have no com- 
munication -with them ; and to give it the greater sanction, 
reduced it to writing, and laid it up in the Caaba. Upon 
this, the tribe became divided into two factions ; and the 
family of Hashem all repaired to Abu Taleb, as their head ; 
except only Abd'al Uzza, surnamed the Abu LaJieh, who, 
out of inveterate hatred to his nephew and his doctrine, 
went over to the opposite party, whose chief was Abu 
Sosian Ebn Harb, of the family of Ommeya. 

The families continued thus at variance for three years ; 
but in the tenth year of his mission, Mahomet told his 
uncle Abu Taleb, that God had manifestly showed his dis- 
approbation of the league which the Koreish had made 
against them, by sending a worm to eat out every word of 
the instrument except the name of God. Of this accident 
Mahomet had probably some private notice ; for Abu 
Taleb went immediately to the Koreish, and acquainted 
them with it ; offering, if it proved false, to deliver his 
nephew up to them ; but, in case it were true, he insisted 
that they ought to lay aside their animosity, and annul 
the league they had made against the Hashemites. To 
this they acquiesced ; and going to inspect the writing, to 
their great astonishment found it to be as Abu Taleb had 
said ; and the league was thereupon declared void. 



332 



MAHOMETANISM. 



In tLe same year Abu Taleb flied at the age of above 
fourscore, and it is tlie general opinion that be died an 
infidel ; thougli others say that, Avhen he was at the point 
of death he embraced Mahomotanism, and produce some 
passages out of his poetical compositions to confirm their 
assertion. About a month, or, as some write, three days, 
after the death of this great benefactor and patron. Ma 
homet had the additional mortification to lose his wife 
Khadijah, who had so generously made his fortune. For 
which reason this year is called the year of mourning. 

On the death of these two persons, the Koreish began 
to be more troublesome than ever to their prophet, and 
especially some who had formerly been his intimate friends; 
insomuch that he found himself obliged to seek for shelter 
elsewhei:e, and first pitched upon Tayef, about sixty miles 
east from Mecca, for the place of his retreat. Thither, 
therefore, he went, accompanied by his servant Zeid, and 
applied himself to two of the chief of the tribe of Thakif, 
who were the inhabitants of that place ; but they received 
him very coldly. However, he stayed there a month ; and 
some of the more considerate and better sort of men 
treated him with a little respect ; but the slaves and inferior 
people at length rose against him ; and bringing him to 
the wall of the city, obliged him to depart and return to 
Mecca, where he put himself under the protection of Al 
Moi^am Ebn Ali. 

• I'bis repulse greatly discouraged his followers. How 
'^ver, Mahomet was not wanting ro himself, but boldly con- 
tinued to preach to the public assemblies at the pilgrimage, 
and gained several proselytes ; and, among them, six of 
the inhabitants of Yathreb, of the Jewish tribe of Khazraj ; 
who, on their return home, failed not to speak much in 
recommendation of their new religion, and exhorted their 
fellow-citizens to embrace the same. 



MAHOMETANISM. 



333 



In tilt twelfth year of his mission it was that Mahomc-t 
gave out that he had made his night journey from Mecca 
to tTerusalem, and thence to heaven, so much spoken of by 
all that write of him. Dr. Prideaux thinks he invented it 
either to answer the expectations of those who demanded 
some miracle as a proof of his mission ; or else, by pre- 
tending to have conversed with God, to establish the 
authority of whatever he should think fit to leave behind 
by way of oral tradition, and make his sayings to serve 
the same purpose as the oral law of the Jews. But it does 
not appear that Mahomet himself ever expected so great 
a regard should be paid to his sayings as his followers havo 
since done ; and seeing he all along disclaimed any power 
of performing miracles, it seems rather to have been a 
fetch of policy to raise his reputation, by pretending to 
have accuailv conversed with God in heaven, as Moses 
bad heretofore done in the mount, and to have received 
several institutions im mediately from him, whereas, before, 
he contented himseii with persuading them that he had 
all by the ministry o; Gabriel. 

However, this story seemed so absurd and incredible, 
that several of his followers left him upon it ; and had 
probably ruined the whole design, had not Abu Beer 
vouched for his veracity, and declared that if Mahomet 
affirmed it to be true, he verily believed the whole. Which 
happy incident not only retrieved the prophe-t's credit, but 
increased it to such a degree, that he was secure of being 
able to make his disciples swallow whatever he pleased to 
impose on them for the future. And this fiction, notwith- 
btanding its extravagance, was one of the most artful con- 
trivances Mahomet ever put in practice, and what chiefly 
contributed to the raising of his reputation to that great 
height to which it aftervfards arrived. 

In thLs year, called by the Mahometans the accepted 



334 



M AHOMET ANISM. 



year^ twelve men of Yathreb or Medina, of whom ten were 
Df tlie tribe of Kbazraj, and the other two of that of Aws, 
)ame to Mecca, and took an oath of fidelity to Mahomet 
vt Al Akaba, a hill on the north of that city. This oath 
was called the womayis oath; not that any women were 
present at this time, but because a man was not thereby 
Dbiiged to take up arms in defence of Mahomet or his 
religion ; it being the same oath that was afterwards 
exacted of the women, the form of which we have in the 
Koran, and is to this effect, viz. : That they should re- 
lounce all idolatry ; and that they should not steal, nor 
commit fornication, nor kill their children (as the pagan 
Arabs used to do when they apprehended they should not 
be able to maintain them), nor forge calumnies ; and that 
they should obey the prophet in all things that were 
reasonable. When they had solemnly engaged to all this, 
Mahomet sent one of his disciples named Masab Ehn 
Omair home with them, to instruct them more fully in 
the grounds and ceremonies of his new religioa. 

Masab, being arrived at Medina, by the a^ssistance of 
those who had been formerly converted, gained several pro* 
belytes, particularly Osed Ebn Hodeira, a chie f man of th.'j 
city, and Saad Ebn Moadh, prince of the trib^ of the Aws; 
Mahometanism spreading so fast, that there was scarce a 
house wherein there were not some who had er^^braced it. 

The next year, being the thirteenth of Mahomet's mis- 
sion, Masab returned to Mecca, accompanied by seventy- 
three men and two women of Medina who had professed 
Islamism, besides some others who were as yet unbtlievers. 
On their arrival they immediately sent to Mahomtt, and 
offered him their assistance, of which he was now in ^reat 
need ; for his adversaries were by this time grown so pow- 
erful in Mecca, that he could not stay there much longer 
without imminent danger. Wherefore he accepted then 



M AHOMETANISM. 



335 



proposal, and met them one night, by appointment, at Al 
Akaba above mentioned, attended by his uncle Al Abbas ; 
who, though he was not then a believer, wished his nephew 
well, and made a speech to those of Medina ; wherein he 
told them that, as Mahomet was obliged to quit his native 
city and seek an asylum elsewhere, and they had offered 
him their protection, they would do well not to deceive him : 
that if they were not firmly resolved to defend, and not 
betray him, they had better declare their minds, and let 
him provide for his safety in some other manner. Upon 
their protesting their sincerity, Mahomet swore to be faith- 
ful to them, on condition that they should protect him 
against all insults as heartily as they would their own wiv^s 
and families. They then asked him what recompense they 
were to expect, if they should happen to be killed in his 
quarrel? He answered. Paradise. Whereupon they pledged 
their faith to him, and so returned home after Mahomet 
had chosen twelve out of their number, who were to have 
the same authority among them as the twelve apostles of 
Christ had among his disciples. 

Hitherto Mahomet had propagated his religion by fair 
means ; so that the whole success of his enterprise before 
his flight to Medina must be attributed to persuasion only, 
and not to compulsion. Yoy before this second Odth of 
fealty or inauguration at Al Akaba, he had no permission 
to use any force at all ; and in several places of the Koran, 
which he pretended were revealed during his stay at Mecca, 
he declares his business was only to preach and admonish; 
that he had no authority to compel any person to embrace 
his religion ; and that, whether people believe or not, was 
none of his concern, but belonged solely unto God. And 
he was so far from allowing his followers to use force, that 
he exhorted them to bear patiently those injuries which 
were offered them on account of their faith; and, when 



336 



MAHOMET A NISM. 



persecuted himself, he chose rather to quit the place of his 
birth, and retire to Medina, than to make any resistant. 
But this great passiveness and moderation seem entirely 
owing to his want of power, and the great superiority of 
his opposers, for the first twelve years of his mission ; for 
no sooner was he enabled, by the assistance of those of Me* 
dina, to make head against his enemies, than he gave out 
that God had allowed him and his followers to defend them 
selves against the infidels ; and at length, as his forces 
increased, he pretended to have the divine leave even to 
attack them, and destroy idolatry, and set up the true faith 
by the sword ; finding by experience, that his designs would 
otherwise proceed very slowly, if they were not utterly 
overthrown ; and knowing, on the other hand, that innova- 
ters, when they depend solely on their own strength, and can 
compel, seldom run any risk ; from whence, says Machiavel, 
it follows that all the armed prophets have succeeded, and 
the unarmed ones have failed. Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, 
and Romulus, would not have been able to establish the 
observance of their institution for any length of time, had 
they not been armed. The first passage of the Koran which 
gave Mahomet the permission of defending himself by arms, 
is said to have been that in the twenty-second chapter ; 
after which, a great number to the same purpose wer^? 
revealed. 

Mahomet, having provided for the security of his com 
panions, as well as his own, by the league ofiensive ard 
defensive which he had now concluded with those of Me- 
dina, directed them to repair thither, which they accord- 
ingly did ; but himself, with Abu Beer and Ali, staid be- 
hind, having not yet received the divine permission, as he 
pretended, to leave Mecca. The Koreish, fearing the con- 
sequence of this new alliance, began to think it absolutely 
necessary to prevent Mahomet's escape to Medina ; and 



MAHOMETAN ISM. 



337 



having neld a council thereon, after several milder expe- 
dients had been rejected, they came to a resolution that he 
should be killed ; and agreed that a man should be chosen 
out of every tribe for the execution of this design ; and that 
each man should have a blow at him with his sword, that 
the guilt of his blood might fall equally on all the tribes, to 
whose united power the Hashemites were much inferior, 
and therefore durst not attempt to revenge their kinsman's 
death. 

This conspiracy was scarce formed, when, by some means 
or other, it came to Mahomet's knowledge, and he gave 
out that it was revealed to him by the angel Gabriel, who 
had now ordered him to retire to Medina. Whereupon, to 
amuse his enemies, he directed Ali to lie down in his place, 
and wrap himself up ir his green cloak, which he did ; and 
Mahomet escaped miraculously, as they pretended, to Abu 
Beer's house, unperceived by the conspirators, who had 
ilready assembled at the prophet's door. They, in the 
meantime, looking through the crevice, and seeing Ali, 
vitom they took to be Mahomet himself, asleep, continued 
watching there till morning, when Ali arose, and they found 
themselves deceived. 

From Abu Beer's house Mahomet and he went to a cave 
in mount Thur, to the southeast of Mecca, accompanied 
only by Amor Ebn Foheirah, Abu Beer's servant, and 
Abd'allah Ebn Oreitah, an idolater whom they had hired 
for a guide. In this cave they lay hid three days, to avoid 
the search of their enemies ; which they very narrowly 
escaped, and not without the assistance of more miracles 
than one ; for some say that the Koreish were struck with 
blindness, so that they could not find the cave ; others, 
that after Mahomet and his companions were got in, two 
pigeons laid their eggs at the entrance, and a spider covered 

29 W 



338 



MAHOMETANISM. 



the moiitli of the cave with her weh, which made them look 
no further. Abu Beer, seeing the prophet in such immi- 
nent danger, became very sorrowful ; whereupon Mahomet 
comforted him with these words, recorded in the Koran : 
Be not grieved^ for Grod is with us. Their enemies being 
retired, they left the cave, and set out for Medina by a 
by-road ; and having fortunately, or, as the Mahometans 
tell us, miraculously, escaped some who were sent to pur- 
sue them, arrived safely at that city ; whither Ali fol- 
lowed them in three days, after he had settled some affairs 
at Mecca. 

Mahomet being securely settled at Medina, and able not 
only to defend himself against the insults of his enemies, 
but to attack them, began to send out small parties to make 
reprisals on the Koreish ; the first party consisting of no 
more than nine men, who intercepted and plundered a 
caravan belonging to that tribe, and in the action took two 
prisoners. But what established his affairs very much, and 
was the foundation on which he built all his succeeding 
greatness, was the gaining of the battle of Bedr, which was 
fought in the second year of the Hegira, and is so famous 
in the Mahometan history. Some reckon no less than 
twenty-seven expeditions, wherein Mahomet was personally 
present, in nine of which he gave battle, besides several 
other expeditions in which he was not present. His forces 
he maintained partly by the contributions of his followers 
for this purpose, which he called by the name of zacat, or 
alms, and the paying of which he very artfully made one 
main article of his religion : and partly by ordering a fifth 
part of the plunder to be brought into the public treasui'y 
for that purpose, in which matter he likewise pretended to 
act by the divine direction. 

In a few years, by the success of his arms, notwithstand- 
'ng he sometimes came off with the worst, he considerably 



M AHOMETANISM. 



339 



raised his credit and power. In the sixth year of the He- 
gira he set out with 1400 men to visit the temple of Mecca, 
not with any intent of committing hostilities, but in a peace- 
able manner. However, when he came to Al Hodeibiya, 
which is situated partly within and partly without the sa- 
cred territory, the Koreish sent to let him know that they 
would not permit him to enter Mecca, unless he forced hia 
way : whereupon he called his troops about him, and they 
all took a solemn oath of fealty or homage to him, and he 
resolved to attack the city; but those of Mecca sending 
Arwa Ebn Masun, prince of the tribe of Thakif, as their 
ambassador, to desire peace, a truce was concluded between 
them for ten years, by which any person was allowed to 
enter into a league either with Mahomet, or with the Koreish, 
as he thought fit. 

In the seventh year of the Hegira, Mahomet began to 
think of propagating his religion beyond the bounds of 
Arabia, and sent messengers to the neighboring princes, 
with letters to invite them to Mahometanism. Nor was 
this project without some success : Khosru Parviz, then 
king of Persia, received his letter with great disdain, and 
tore it in a passion, sending away the messenger very 
abruptly ; which, when Mahomet heard, he said, G-od shall 
tear his kingdom. And soon after a messenger came to 
Mahomet from Badhan, king of Yaman, who was a depen- 
dent on the Persians, to acquaint him that he had received 
orders to send him to Khosru. Mahomet put off his an- 
swer till the next morning, and then told the messenger it 
had been revealed to him that night that Khosru was slain 
by his son Shiruyeh : adding, that he was well assured his 
new religion and empire should rise to as great a height as 
that of Khosru : and therefore bid him advise his master 
to embrace Mahometanism. The messenger being returned, 
Badhan in a fer days received a letter from Shiruyeh, in- 



340 



MAHOMETANISM. 



forming him of his father's death, and ordering him to give 
the prophet no further disturbance. "Whereupon Badnan, 
and the Persians with him, turned Mahometans. 

The emperor Heraclius, as the Arabian historians assure 
us, received Mahomet's letter with great respect, laying it 
on his pillow, and dismissed the bearer honorably. And 
some pretend that he would have professed this new faith, 
had he not been afraid of losing his crown. 

Mahomet wrote to the same effect to the king of Ethio- 
pia, though he had been converted before, according to the 
Arab writers; and to Mokawkas, governor of Egypt, who 
gave the messenger a very favorable reception, and sent 
several valuable presents to Mahomet, and among the rest 
two girls, one of whom, named Mary, became a great favo- 
rite with him. He also sent letters of the like purport to 
several Arab princes ; particularly one to Al Hareth Ebn 
Abi Shamer, king of Ghassan, who, returning for answer 
that he would go to Mahomet himself, the prophet said, 
May his Mngdom perish I Another to Hawdha Ebn Ali, 
king of Yamama, who was a Christian, and, having some 
time before professed Islamism, had lately returned to his 
former faith : this prince sent back a very rough answer, 
upon which Mahomet cursing him, he died soon after ; and 
a third to Al Mondar Ebn Sawa, king of Bahrein, who 
embraced Mahometanism, and all the Arabs of that country 
followed his example. 

The eighth year of the Hegira was a very fortunate 
year to Mahomet. In the beginning of it Khaled Ebn al 
Walid and Amru Ebn al As, both excellent soldiers, the 
first of whom afterwards conquered Syria and other coun- 
tries, and the latter Egypt, became proselytes to Mahome- 
tanism. And soon after the prophet sent 3000 men against 
the Grecian forces, to revenge the death of one of his am- 
b issadors, who, being sent to the governor of Bosra on the 



MAIIOMEIANISM 341 

same errand as those who went to thd above-mentioned 
princes, was slain by an Arab of the tribe of Ghassan, at 
Muta, a town in the territory of Balka, in Syria, about 
three days' journey eastward from Jerusalem, near which 
town they encountered. The Grecians being vastly supe- 
rior in number (for, including the auxiliary Arabs, they 
had an army of 100,000 men), the Mahometans were re- 
pulsed in the first attack, and lost successively three of 
their generals, viz., Zeid Ebn Haretha, Mahomet's freed- 
man ; Jassar, the son of Abu Taleb ; and Abdalia Ebn 
Rawalia: but Khaled Ebn al Walid, succeeding to the 
command, overthrew the Greeks with great slaughter, and 
brought away abundance of rich spoil : on occasion of which 
action Mahomet gave him the tirle of Seifjnin soy uf Allah, 
"one of the swords of God." 

In this year also Mahomet took the city of Mecca, the 
inhabitants whereof had broken the truce concluded on two 
years before ; for the tribe of Beer, who were confederates 
with the Koreish, attacking those of Kozaah, who werg 
allies of Mahomet, killed several of them, being supported 
in the action by a party of the Koreish themselves. The 
consequence of this violation was soon apprehended, and 
Abu Sosian himself made a journey to Medina on purpose 
to heal the breach and renew the truce, but in vain ; for 
Mahomet, glad of this opportunity, refused to see him ; 
whereupon he applied to Abu Beer and Ali; but they 
giving him no answer, he was obliged to return to Mecca 
as he came. 

Mahomet immediately gave orders for preparations to 
be made that he might surprise the Meccans while they 
were unprovided to receive him : in a little time he began 
his march thither ; and by the time he came near the city, 
his forces were increased to ten thousand men. Those of 
Mecca not being in a condition to defend themselves against 

29* 



342 



MAHOMETANISM. 



SO formidable an army, surrendered at discretion, and Abu 
Sosian saved his life by turning Maliometan. About 
twenty-eigbt of the idolaters were killed by a party under 
the command of Khaled ; but this happened contrary to 
Mahomet'^ orders, who, when he entered the town, par- 
doned all the Koreish on their submission, except only six 
men and four women^ who were more obnoxious than ordi- 
nary (some of them having apostatized), and were solemnly 
proscribed by the prophet himself ; but of these no more 
than one man and one woman were put to death, the rest 
obtaining pardon on their embracing Mahometanism, and 
one of the women making her escape. 

The remainder of this year Mahomet employed in de- 
stroying the idols in and around Mecca, sending several 
of the generals on expeditions for that purpose, and to 
invite the Arabs to Islamism ; wherein it is no wonder if 
they now met with success. 

The next year, being the ninth of the Hegira, the Ma- 
hometans call the year of embassies ; for the Arabs had 
been hitherto expecting the issue of the war between Ma- 
homet and the Koreish; but as soon as that tribe, the 
principal of the whole nation, and the genuine descendants 
of Ishmael, whose prerogatives none offered to dispute, 
had submitted, they were satisfied that it was not in theii 
power to oppose Mahomet ; and therefore began to come 
in to him in great numbers, and to send embassies to make 
their submissions to him, both to Mecca, w^hile he staid 
there, and also to Medina, whither he returned this year. 
Among the rest, five kings of the tribe of Hamyar pro 
fessed Mahometanism, and sent ambassadors to notify the 
same. 

In the tenth year All was sent into Yaman to propagate 
the Mahometan faith there ; and, as it is said, converted 
the whole tribe of Hamdan in one day. Their example 



MAHOMETANISM. 



343 



was quickly followed by all the inhabitants of that pro- 
vince, except only those of Najran, who, being Christians, 
chose rather to pay tribute. 

Thus was Mahometanism established, and idolatry rooted 
out, even in Mahomet's lifetime (for he died the next year), 
throughout all Arabia, except only Yamama, where Mo- 
seilama, who set up also as a prophet, as Mahomet's com- 
petitor, had a great party, and was not reduced till the 
kalifat of Abu Beer ; and the Arabs being then united in 
one faith, and' under one prince, found themselves in a 
condition of making those conquests which extended the 
Mahometan faith over so great a part of the world. 

1. Tenets of the Maliometans. — The Mahometans divide 
their religion into two general parts, faith and practice ; 
of which the first is divided into six distinct branches : 
Belief in God, in his angels, in his Scriptures, in his pro- 
phets, in the resurrection and final judgment, and in God's 
absolute decrees. The points relating to practice aro 
prayer, with washings, etc., alms, fasting, pilgrimage to 
Mecca, and circumcision. 

Of the Mahometan Faith. — 1. That both Mahomet, and 
those among his followers who are reckoned orthodox, had 
and continue to have just and true notions of God and his 
attributes, appears so plain from the Koran itself, and all 
the Mahometan divines, that it would be loss of time to 
refute those who suppose the God of Mahomet to be differ- 
ent from the true God, and only a fictitious deity or idol 
of his own creation. 

2. The existence of angels and their purity, are abso- 
lutely required to be believed in the Koran ; and he is 
reckoned an infidel who denies there are such beings, or 
hates any of them, or asserts any distinction of sexes 
among them. They believe them to have pure and subtle 
bodies, created of fire ; that they neither eat nor drink, 



M A H ^1 E T A X I S M . 



nor propagate tlieir species ; that tliej have various forms 
and offices, some adoring God in different postures, others 
singing praises to him, or interceding for mankind. They 
hold that some of them are employed in writing down the 
actions of men ; others in carrying the throne of God, 
and other services. 

3. As to the Scriptures, the Mahometans are taught hy 
the Koran that God, in divers ages of the world, gave 
revelations of his will in writir^g to several prophets, the 
whole and every one of which it is absolutely iieces-sary 
for a o'ood Moslem to believe. The number of tliese sacred 

o 

boohs were, according to them, one hundred and four ; of 
which ten were given to A'lam, fifty to Seth, thirty to 
Edris or Enoch, ten to Abraham : and the ofaer four, 
being the Pentateuch, the Psalms, the Gospel, and the 
Koran, were successively delivered to Moses, David, Jesus, 
and Mahomet ; which last being the seal of the p^-ophets, 
those revelations are now closed, and no more ar*^ to be 
expected. All these divine boohs, „*xcept the fonr last, 
they agree to be now entirely lost, and their conte-its un- 
known; though the Sabians have several books wliir-h they 
attribitte to some of the antediluAuan prophets. And of 
those four, the Pentateuch, Psalms, and Gospel, the 7 say, 
have undergone so many alterations and corruption!^, that 
though there may possibly be some part of the true W'.ird 
of God therein, yet no credit is to be given to the p^^sent 
copies in the hands of the Jews and Christians. 

4. The number of the prophets which have been from 
time to time sent by God into the world, amounts ^ no 
less than 224,000, according to one Mahometan tradition, 
or to 124,000, according to another; among whom 313 
were apostles, sent with special commissions to rec^--aim 
mankind from infidelity and superstition; and six of t^-^em 
brought new laws or dispensations,, which successivelj ib- 



MAHOMETANTSM. 



345 



rogated the preceding ; these were Adam, Noah, Abra- 
ham, Moses, Jesus, and Mahomet. All the prophets in 
general the Mahometans believe to have been free from 
great sins and errors of consequence, and professors of 
one and the same religion — that is, Islamism — notwith- 
standing the different laws and institutions which they 
observed. They allow of degrees among them, and hold 
some of them to be more excellent and honorable than 
others . The first place they give to the revealers and 
estaVishers of new dispensations, and the next to the 
apostles. 

In this great number of prophets they not only reckon 
divers patriarchs and persons named in Scripture, but not 
recorded to have been prophets (wherein the Jewish and 
Christian writers have sometimes led the way), as Adam, 
Seth, Lot, Ishmael, Nun, Joshua, etc., and introduce some 
of them under different names, as JEnoch, Heber, and 
Jethro, who are called in the Koran Udris, Sua, and 
Shoaih ; but several others whose very names do not ap' 
pear in Scripture (though they endeavor to find some per 
sons there to fix them on), as Saleh, Khedr, Dhu'lkefl, etc. 

5. The belief of a general resurrection and a future 
judgment. 

The time of the resurrection the Mahometans allow to 
be a perfect secret to all but God alone; the angel Gabriel 
himself acknowledging his ignorance on this point, when 
Mahomet asked him about it. However, they say the ap- 
proach of that day may be known from certain signs 
which are to precede it. 

After examination is past (the account of which is too 
long and tedious for this place), and every one's works 
weighed in a just balance, they say that mutual retaliation 
will follow, according to which every creature will take 
vengeance one of another, or have satisfaction made them 



346 



MAIIOMBTANISM. 



for the injuries which they have suffered. And, since thero 
will then be no other way of returning like for like, the 
manner of giving this satisfaction will be by taking away 
a proportional part of the good works of him who offered 
the injury, and adding it to those of him who suffered it. 
Which being done, if the angels (by whose ministry this is 
to be performed) say, Lord, we have given to every one his 
due, and there remaineth of this person s good works so 
much as equalleth the weight of an ant, God will, of his 
mercy, cause it to be doubled unto him, that he may be 
admitted into Paradise ; but if, on the contrary, his good 
works be exhausted, and there remain evil works only, and 
there be any who have not yet received satisfaction from 
bim, God will order that an equal weight of their sins be 
added unto his, that he may be punished for them in their 
stead, and he will be sent to hell laden with both. This 
will be the method of God's dealing with mankind. As to 
b**utes, after they shall have likewise taken vengeance of 
one another, he will command them to be changed into 
dust; wicked men being reserved to more grievous punish- 
ment, so that they shall cry out, on hearing this sentence 
passed on the brutes. Would to Crod that we were dust 
also ! As to the genii, many Mahometans are of opinion 
that such of them as are true believers, will undergo the 
same fate as the irrational animals, and have no other re- 
ward than the favor of being converted into dust ; and for 
this they quote the authority of their prophet. 

The trials being over, and the assembly dissolved, the 
Mahometans hold that those who are to be admitted into 
Paradise will take the right hand way, and those who are 
destined into hell fire will take the left ; but both of them 
must first pass the bridge called in Arabic Al Sirat, which, 
they say, is laid over the midst of hell, and describe to be 
finer than a hair, and sharper than the edge of a sword ; 



MAHOMETANISM. 



347 



BO that it seems very difficult to conceive how any one 
«hall be able to stand upon it ; for which reason most of 
the sect of the Motazalites reject it as a fable ; though the 
orthodox think it a sufficient proof of. the truth of this 
article, that it was seriously affirmed by him who never 
asserted a falsehood, meaning their prophet ; who, to add 
to the difficulty of the passage, has likewise declared tha" 
this bridge is beset on each side with briers and hooked 
thorns, which will, however, be no impediment to the good ; 
for they shall pass with wonderful ease and swiftness, like 
lightning, or the wind, Mahomet and his Moslems leading 
the way ; whereas the wicked, what with the slipperiness 
and extreme narrowness of the path, the entangling of the 
thorns, and the extinction of the light which directed the 
former to Paradise, will soon miss their footing, and fall 
down headlong into hell, which is gaping beneath them. 

As to the punishment of the wicked, the Mahometans 
are taught that hell is divided into seven stories or apart- 
ments, one below another, designed for the reception of as 
many distinct classes of the damned. 

The first, which they call Jehenan, they say will be the 
receptacle of those who acknowledged one God, that is, 
the wicked Mahometans ; who, after having been punished 
according to their demerits, will at length be released ; 
the second, named LadJca, they assign to the Jews; the 
third, named Al Hotama, to the Christians ; the fourth, 
named Al Sair, to the Sabians ; the fifth, named Sakar, 
to the Magians; the sixth, named Al Jahin, to the idola- 
ters ; and the seventh, which is the lowest and worst of 
all, and is called Al Hawyat^ to the hypocrites, or those 
who outwardly professed some religion, but in their hearts 
were of none. Over each of these apartments they be- 
lieve there will be set a guard of angels, nineteen in num- 
ber, to whom the damned will confess the just iudgmeut 



348 



MAHOMETANISM. 



of God, and beg them to intercede with him for some alle- 
viation of their pain, or that thej may be delivereil by 
being annihilated. 

Mahomet has, in his Koran and traditions, been very 
exact in describing the various torments of hell, which, 
according to hiii., the wickei will suffer, both from intense 
heat and excessive cold. We shall, however, enter into 
no detail of them here, but only observe that the degrees 
of these pains will also vary in proportion to the crimes 
of the sufferer, and the apartment he is condemned to ; 
and that he who is punished the most lightly of all will be 
shod with shoes of fire, the fervor of which will cause his 
skull to boil like a cauldron. The condition of these un- 
happy wretches, as the same prophet teaches, cannot be 
properly called either life or death ; and their misery will 
be greatly increased by their despair of being ever deli- 
vered from that place, since, according to that frequent 
expression in the Koran, they must remain therein forever. 
It must be remarked, however, that the infidels alone will 
be liable to eternity of damnation ; for the Moslems, or 
those who have embraced the true religion, and have been 
guilty of heinous sins, will be delivered thence after they 
shall have expiated their crimes by their sufferings. The 
time which these believers shall be detained there, accord- 
ing to a tradition handed'down from their prophet, will not 
be less than nine hundred years, nor more than seven 
thousand. And, as to the manner of their delivery, they 
say that they shall be distinguished by the marks of pros- 
tration on those parts of their bodies with which they used 
to touch the ground in pray -jr, and over which the fire will 
therefore hane no power ; and that being known by this 
characteristic, they will be released by the mercy of God, 
at the intercession of Mahomet and the blessed ; where- 
upon those who shall have been dead will be restored tc 



MAHOMETANISM. 



349 



life, as has been said ; and those whose bodies shall have 
contracted any sootiness or filth from tbe flames and smoke 
of hell, will be immersed in one of the rivers of Paradise, 
called the River of Life^ which will wasli them whiter 
than pearls. 

The righteous, as the Mahometans are taught to believe, 
having surmounted the difficulties, and passed the sharp 
bridge above mentioned, before tliey enter Paradise, will 
be refreshed by drinking at the pond of their prophet, 
who describes it to be an exact square, of a month's jour- 
ney in compass ; its water, which is supplied by two pipes 
from Al Cawthay, one of the rivers of Paradise, being 
whiter than milk or silver, and more odoriferous than 
musk, with as many cups set around it as there are stars 
in the firmament ; of which water, whoever drinks will 
thirst no more forever. This is the first taste which the 
blessed will have of their future and now near-approaching 
felicity. 

Though Paradise be so very frequently mentioned in 
the Koran, yet it is a dispute among the Mahometans, 
whether it be already created, or to be created hereafter ; 
the Motazalites and some other sectaries asserting, that 
there is not at present any such place in nature, and that 
the Paradise which the righteous will inhabit in the next 
life will be difi"erent from that from which Adam was 
expelled. However, the orthodox profess the contrary, 
maintaining that it was created even before the world, and 
describe it, from their prophet's traditions, in the following 
manner : — 

They say it is situated above the seven heavens (or in 
the seventh heaven,) and next under the throne of God ; 
and, to express the amenity of the place, tell us, that the 
earth of it is of the finest wheat-flour, or of the purest 
Kiusk, or, as others will have it, of saffron ; that its stones 

30 



350 



MAHOMETANISM. 



arc pearls and jacinths, the walls of its buildings enriched 
with gold and silver, and that the trunks of all its trees 
are of gold ; among which the most remarkable is the tree 
called tuha, or the tree of happiness. Concerning this 
tree, they fable that it stands in the palace of Mahomet, 
though a branch of it will reach to the house of every true 
believer ; that it will be laden with pomegranates, grapes, 
dates, and other fruits, of surprising bigness, and of tastes 
unknown to mortals. So that, if a man desire to eat of any 
particular kind of fruit, it will immediately be presented 
him ; or, if he choose flesh, birds ready dressed will be set 
before him, according to his wish. They add that the 
boughs of this tree will spontaneously bend down to the 
hand of the person who would gather of its fruits, and that 
it will supply the blessed not only with food, but also 
with silken garments, and beasts to ride on ready saddled 
and bridled, and adorned with rich trappings, which will 
burst forth from its fruits ; and that this tree is so large, 
that a person mounted on the fleetest horse would not be 
able to gallop from one end of its shade to the other in 
one hundred years. 

As plenty of water is one of the greatest additions to 
the pleasantness of any place, the Koran often speaks of 
the rivers of Paradise as a principal ornament thereof; 
some of these rivers, they say, flow with water, some with 
milk, some with wine, and others with honey ; all taking 
their rise from the root of the tree tuba. 

But all these glories will be eclipsed by the resplendent 
and ravishing girls of Paradise, called, from their large 
black eyes, Hur al oyun^ the enjoyment of whose company 
will be a principal felicity of the faithful. These, they say, 
are created not of clay, as mortal women are, but of pure 
musk ; being, as their prophet often afiirms in his Koran, 
fir^e from all natural impurities, defects, and inconveniences 



MAHOMETANISM. 



351 



incident to the sex ; of the strictest modesty, and secluded 
from public view in pavilions of hollow pearls, so large, 
that, as some traditions have it, one of them will be no 
less than four parasangs (or, as others say, sixty miles) 
long, and as many broad. 

The name which the Mahometans usually give to this 
happy mansion is al Jannat, or, "the Garden;" and 
sometimes they call it, with an addition, Jannat al Ferdaws^ 
"the Garden of Paradise;" Jannat Adan, "the Garden 
of Eden," (though they generally interpret the word Eden 
not according to its acceptation in Hebrew, but according 
to its meaning in their own tongue, wherein it signifies "a 
settled or perpetual habitation;") Jannat al Maw a, "the 
Garden of Abode;" Jannat al Maim, "the Garden of 
Pleasure," and the like ; by which several appellations 
some understand so many different gardens, or at least 
places of different degrees of felicity, (for they reckon no 
less than one hundred such in all,) the very meanest 
whereof will afford its inhabitants so many pleasures and 
delights, that one would conclude they must even sink 
under them, had not Mahomet declared that, in order to 
qualify the blessed for a full enjoyment of them, God will 
give to every one the abilities of one hundred men. 

6. God's absolute decree and predestination both of 
good and evil. The orthodox doctrine is, that whatever 
hath or shall come to pass in this world, whether it be 
good, or whether it be bad, proceedeth entirely from the 
Divine will, and is irrevocably fixed and recorded from all 
eternity in the preserved table ; God having secretly pre- 
determined not only the adverse and prosperous fortune 
of every person in this world, in the most minute par- 
ti<3ulars, but also his faith or infidelity, his obedience or 
disobedience, and consequently his everlasting happiness 
or misery after death ; which fate or predestination it is 
Qot possible by any foresight or wisdom to avoid. 



352 



MAHOMETANISM. 



II. Religious 'practice. 1. The first point is prayer^ 
under which are also comprehended those legal washings 
or purifications which are necessary preparations thereto. 

For the regular performance of the duty of prayer 
among the Mahometans, it is requisite, while they pray, 
to turn their faces towards the temple of Mecca; the 
quarter where the same is situated being, for that reason, 
pointed out within their mosques by a niche, which they 
call al 3Iehrab ; and without, by the situation of the doors 
opening into the galleries of the steeples ; there are also 
tables calculated for the ready finding out their Keblah, 
or part towards which they ought to pray, in places where 
they have no other direction. 

2. Alms are of two sorts, legal and voluntary. The 
legal alms are of indispensable obligation, being commanded 
by the law, which directs and determines both the portion 
which is to be given, and of what things it ought to consist ; 
but the voluntary alms are left to erery one's liberality, to 
give more or less as he shall see fit. The former kind of 
alms some think to be properly called zacat^ and the latter, 
sadakat, though this name be also frequently given to the 
legal alms. They are called zacat^ either because they 
increase a man's store by drawing down a blessing thereon, 
and produce in his soul the virtue of liberality ; or because 
ihey imrify the remaining part of one's substance from 
pollution, and the soul from the filth of avarice ; and 
sadakat, because they are a proof of a man's sincerity in 
the worship of God. Some writers have called the legal 
alms tithes; but improperly, since in some cases they fall 
ghort, and in others exceed that proportion. 

3. Fasting is a duty of so great moment, that Mahomet 
used to say it was the gate of religion, and that the odor 
of the mouth of hirn ivho fasteth is more gratef ul to God 
than that of musk; and Al Ghazali reckons fasting one 



MAHOMETANISM. 



353 



fourth 'part of the faith. According lo the Mahometan 
divines, there are three degrees of fasting : 1. The re- 
straining the belly and other parts of the body from satis- 
fying their lusts. 2. The restraining the ears, eyes, 
tongue, hands, feet, and other members from sin. 3. The 
fasting of the heart from worldly cares, and restraining 
the thought from everything besides God. 

4. The pilgrimage to Mecca is so necessary a point of 
practice, that according to a tradition of Mahomet, he who 
dies without performing it, may as well die a Jew or a 
Christian ; and the same is expressly commanded in the 
Koran. 

III. Causes of the success of Ilahometanism. — The 
rapid success which attended the propagation of this new 
religion was owing to causes that are plain and evident, 
and must remove, or rather prevent our surprise, when they 
are attentively considered. The terror of Mahomet's 
arms, and the repeated victories which were gained by him 
and his successors, were, no doubt, the irresistible argu- 
ments that persuaded such multitudes to embrace his reli- 
gion, and submit to his dominion. Besides, his law was 
artfully and marvellously adapted to the corrupt nature of 
man ; and, in a most particular manner, to the manners 
and opinions of the Eastern nations, and the vices to 
which they were naturally addicted; for the articles of 
faith which it proposed were few in number, and extremely 
simple ; and the duties it required were neither many nor 
difficult, nor such as were incompatible with the empire of 
appetites and passions. It is to be observed farther, that 
the gross ignorance under which the Arabians, Syrians, 
Persians, and the greatest part of the Eastern nations, 
labored at this time, rendered many an easy prey to the 
artifice and eloquence of this bold adventurer. To these 
causes of the progress of Mahometanism, we may add thu 

30* X 



354 



MAHOMETANISM. 



bitter J-issensions and cruel animosities that reigned among 
the Christian sects, particularly the Greeks, JSTestorians, 
Eutychians, and Monophjsites ; dissensions that filled a 
great part of the East with carnage, assassinations, and 
such detestable enormities, as rendered the very name of 
Christianity odious to many. We might add here, that 
the Monophysites and Nestorians, full of resentment 
against the Greeks, from whom they had suffered the bit- 
terest and most injurious treatment, assisted the Arabians 
in the conquest of several provinces, into which, of conse- 
quence, the religion of Mahomet was afterwards intro- 
duced. Other causes of the sudden progress of that reli- 
gion will naturally occur to such as consider attentively 
its spirit and genius, and the state of the world at this 
time. 

Although the Mahometan creed, or, as it is more gene- 
rally called, Islamism, has within the past few years 
greatly extended its sway in India, China, Cochin-China 
and Central and Western Africa, converting whole nation- 
alities to the belief in the Koran, yet there is some reason 
for believing that it is tottering to its downfall. In Tur- 
key and Egypt, which have hitherto been its greatest 
strongholds, it has lost much of its power. European civ- 
ilization and culture, and, above all, American and Euro- 
pean Christianity, have penetrated into the Ottoman court 
and among the Turkish people ; and the old Turkish the- 
ologians are themselves predicting the overthrow of the 
religion of* the prophets. The numerous attempts at 
^Reformation within a few years past indicate the con- 
sciousness on the part of thoughtful Mahometans that 
something must be done ; while the conversion of some of 
tlieir most eminent men to Christianity show^s that truth is 
effecting a lodgment in their hearts. 



JEWS. 



355 



JEWS, 

The name Jews is a name derived from the patriarch 
Judah, and given to the descendants of Abraham by his 
grandson Jacob. We shall here present the reader with 
fls comprehensive a view of this singular people as we can. 

1. History of the Jews. — The Almighty promised Abra- 
ham that he would render his seed extremely numerous : 
this promise began to be fulfilled in Jacob's twelve sons. 
In about two hundred and fifteen years they increased in 
Egypt from seventy to between two and three millions, 
men, women, and chddren. While Joseph lived, they were 
kindly used by the Egyptian monarchs ; but soon aft(T, 
from a suspicion that they would become too strong for the 
natives, they were condemned to slavery; but the more 
they were oppressed, the more they grew. The midwives 
and others were therefore ordered to murder every male 
infant at the time of its birth ; but they shirking the horri- 
ble ta&k, everybody was then ordered to destroy the male 
children wherever they found them. 

After they had been thus oppressed for about one hun- 
dred years, and on the very day that finished the four 
hundred and thirtieth year from God's first promise of a 
seed to Abraham, and about four hundred years after the 
birth of Isaac, God, by terrible plagues on the Egyptians, 
obliged them to liberate the Hebrews under the direction 
Df Moses and Aaron. Pharaoh pursued them with a 
mighty army ; but the Lord opened a passage for them 
through the Bed Sea; and the Egyptians, in attempting 
to follow them, were drowned. After this, we find them 
in a dry and barren desert, without any provision for their 



356 



JEWS. 



jonrney ; but God supplied them with water from a rock, 
and manna and quails from heaven. A little after they 
routed the Amalekites, who fell on their rear. In the 
wilderness God delivered them the law, and confirmed the 
authority of Moses. Three thousand of them were cut 
off for worshipping the golden calf ; and for loathing the 
manna, they were punished with a month's eating of flesh, 
till a plague broke out among them ; and for their rash 
belief of the ten wicked spies, and the contempt of the 
promised land, God had entirely destroyed them, had not 
Moses' prayers prevented. They were condemned, how- 
ever, to wander in the desert till the end of forty years, 
till that whole generation, except Caleb and Joshua, should 
be cut off by death. Here they were often punished for 
their rebellion, idolatry, whoredom, &c. God's marvellous 
favors, however, were still continued in conducting and 
supplying them with meat ; and the streams issuing from 
the rock of Meribah followed their camp about thirty -nine 
years, and their clothes never waxed old. 

On their entrance into Canaan, God ordered them to 
cut off every idolatrous Canaanite ; but they spared vast 
numbers of them, who enticed them to wickedness, and 
were sometimes God's rod to punish them. For many ages 
they had enjoyed little prosperity, and often relapsed into 
awful idolatry, worshipping Baalim and Ashtaroth. Micah 
and the Danites introduced it not long after Joshua's 
death. About this time the lewdness of the men of Gibeaia 
occasioned a war of the eleven tribes against their brethren 
of Benjamin ; they were twice routed by the Benjamitea, 
and forty thousand of them were slain. In the third, 
however, all the Benjamites were slain, except six hundred. 
Vexed for the loss of a tribe, the other Hebrews provided 
wives for these six hundred, at the expense of slaying most 
of the inhabitants of Jabesh Giiead. 



JEWS. 



357 



Their relapses into idolatry also brought on them re- 
peated turns of slavery from the heathen among or around 
them. See hooks of Judges and Samuel. Having been 
governed by judges for about three hundred and forty 
years after the death of Joshua, they took a fancy to hava 
a king. Saul was their first sovereign, under whose reign 
they had perpetual struggles with the Ammonites, Moab- 
ites, and Philistines. After about seven years' struggling 
between the eleven tribes that clave to Ishbosheth, the son 
of Saul, and the tribe of Judah, who erected themselves 
into a kingdom under David, David became sole monarch. 
Under him they subdued their neighbors, the Philistines, 
Edomites, and others ; and took possession the whole 
dominion which had been promised them, froEi the border 
of Egypt to the banks of the Euphrates. Undiir Solomon 
they had little war ; when he died, ten of the Hebrew 
tribes formed a kingdom of Israel, or Ephraim, for them- 
selves, under Jeroboam, the son of Kebat, in opposition to 
the kingdom of Judah and Benjamin, ruled by the family 
of David. The kingdom of Israel, Ephraim, or the ten 
tribes, had never so much as one pious king ; idolatry was 
always their established religion. The kingdom of Judah 
had pious and wicked sovereigns by turns, though they 
often relapsed into idolatry, which brought great distress 
upon them. See books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles. 
Not only the kingdom of Israel, but that of Judah, was 
brought to the very brink of ruin after the death of Jeho- 
shaphat. 

After various changes, sometimes for the better and 
sometimes for the worse, the kingdom of Israel was ruined 
two hundred and fifty four years after its erection, by So, 
king of Egypt, and Halmanaser, king of Assyria, who in 
vaded it, and destroyed most of the people. Judah w^aa 
invaded by Sennacherib ; but Hezekiah's piety and Isaiah's 



358 



JEWS. 



prayer were tlie means of their preservation ; but under 
Manasseh, the Jews abandoned themselves to horrid im- 
|)iety ; for which they were punished by Esarhaddon, kmg 
j»f Assyria, who invaded and reduced the kingdom, and 
harried Manasseh prisoner to Babylon. Manasseh re- 
pented, and the Lord brought him back to his kingdom, 
where he promoted the reformation; but his son Amon 
defaced all. Josiah, however, again promoted it, and car- 
ried it to a higher pitch than in the reigns of David and 
Solomon. After Josiah was slain by Pharaoh Necho, king 
of Egypt, the people returned to idolatry, and God gav* 
them up to servitude to the Egyptians and Chaldeans 
The fate of their kings, Jehoas, Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin, 
and Zedekiah, was unhappy. Provoked by Zedekiah's 
treachery, Nebuchadnezzar invaded the kingdom, murdered 
vast numbers, and reduced them to captivity. 

Thus the kingdom of Judah was ruined, A. M. 3416, 
about three hundred and eighty-eight years after its divi- 
sion from that of the ten tribes. In the seventieth year 
from the begun captivity, the Jews, according to the edict 
of Cyrus, king of Persia, who had overturned the empire 
of Chaldea, returned to their own country. See Nehemiah, 
Ezra. Vast numbers of them, who had agreeable settle- 
ments, remained in Babylon. After their return they 
rebuilt the temple and city of Jerusalem, put away their 
strange wives, and renewed their covenant with God. 

About 8490, or 3546, they escaped the ruin designed 
them by Haman. About 3653, Darius Ochus, king of 
Persia, ravaged part of Judea, and carried ojQf a great 
many prisoners. When Alexander was in Canaan, about 
3670, he confirmed to them all their privileges ; and having 
built Alexandria, he settled vast numbers of them there. 
About fourteen years after, Ptolemy Lagus, the Greek 
king of Egypt, ravaged Judea, and carried one hundred 



JEWS. 



359 



thousand prisoners to Egypt, but used tliein kindly, and 
assigned them many places of trust. About eight years 
after, he transported another multitude of Jews to Egypt, 
and gave them considerable privileges. About the same 
time, Seleucus Nicator, having built about thirty new 
cities in Asia, settled in them^ as many Jews as he could : 
and Ptolemy Philadelphus, of Egypt, about 3720, bought 
the freedom of all the Jew slaves in Egypt. Antiochus 
Epiphanes, about 3834, enraged with them for rejoicing 
at the report of his death, and for the peculiar form of 
their worship, in his return from Egypt, forced his way 
into Jerusalem, and murdered forty thousand of them ; 
and about two years after he ordered his troops to pillage 
the cities of Judea, and murder the men, and sell the 
women and children for slaves. Multitudes were killed, 
and ten thousand prisoners carried off ; the temple was 
dedicated to Olympius, an idol of Greece, and the Jews 
exposed to the basest treatment. Mattathias, the priest, 
with his sons, chiefly Judas, Jonathan, and Simon, who 
were called Maccabees, bravely fought for their religion 
and liberties. Judas, who succeeded his father about 
3840, gave Nicanor and the king's troops a terrible defeat, 
regained the temple and dedicated it anew, restored the 
daily worship, and repaired Jerusalem, which was almost 
in a ruinous heap. After his death, Jonathan and Simon, 
his brethren, successively succeeded him ; and both wisely 
and bravely promoted the welfare of the Church and 
State. Simon was succeeded by his son Hircanus, who 
subdued Idumea and reduced the Samaritans. In 3899 
he was succeeded by his son Janneus, who reduced the 
Philistines, the country of Moab, Ammon, Gilead, and 
part of Arabia. Under these three reigns alone the Jewish 
nation was independent after the captivity. After the 
death of the widow of Janneus, who govbrned nine? years, 



360 



JEWS. 



the nation was almost ruined by civil broils. In 898&, 
Aristobulus invited the Romans to assist him against Hir- 
canus, his elder brother. The country was quickly re- 
duced, and Jerusalem taken by force ; and Pompey and a 
number of his officers, pushed their way into the sanc- 
tuary, if not into the Holy of Holies, to view the furniture 
thereof. Nine years after, Grasses, the Roman general, 
pillaged the temple of its valuables. After Judea had for 
more than thirty years been a scene of ravage and blood, 
and twenty-four of which had been oppressed by Herod 
the Great, Herod got himself installed in the kingdom. 
About twenty years before our Saviour's birth, he, with 
the Jew's consent, began to build the temple. About this 
time the Jews had hopes of the Messiah; and about A. M. 
4000, Christ actually came, whom Herod (instigated by 
the fear of losing his throne) sought to murder. The 
Jews, however, a few excepted, rejected the Messiah, and 
put him to death. The sceptre was now wholly departed 
from Judah ; and Judea, about twenty-seven years before, 
reduced to a province. The Jews, since that time, have 
been scattered, contemned, persecuted, and enslaved 
among all nations, not mixed with any in the common 
manner, but have remained as a body distinct by them- 
selves. 

2. Sentiments of the Jews, — The Jews commonly reckon 
but fourteen articles of their faith. Maimonides, a famous 
Jewish rabbi, reduced them to this number when he drew 
up their confession about the end of the eleventh century, 
and it was generally received. All the Jews are obliged 
to live and die in the profession of thes^ thirteen articles, 
which are as follows ; — 1. That God is the creator of all 
things ; that He guides and supports all creatures ; that 
He has done everything ; and that He still acts, and shall 
act during the whole eternity. — 2. That God is one ; there 



JETV S. 



361 



IS no unity like his. He alone hath been, is, and shall be 
eternally our God. — 3. That God is incorporeal, and can- 
not have any material properties ; and no corporeal es- 
sence can be compared with him. — 4. That God is tlie 
beginning and end of all things, and shall eternally sub- 
sist, — 5. That God alone ought to be worshipped, and 
none beside Him is to be adored. — 6. That whatever has 
been taught by the prophets is true. — 7. That Moses is 
the head and father of all contemporary doctors, of those 
who lived before, or shall live after him. — 8. That the law 
was given by Moses. — 9. That the law shall never be 
altered, and that God will give no other. — 10. That God 
knows all the thoughts and actions of men. — 11. That God 
will regard the works of all those who have performed 
what he commands, and punish those who have trans- 
gressed his laws.— 12. That the Messiah is to come, though 
he tarry a long time. — 13.- That there shall be a resurrec- 
tion of the dead when God shall see fit. 

The modern Jews adhere still as closely to the Mosaic 
dispensation, as their dispersed and despised condition will 
permit them. Their service consists chiefly in reading the 
law in their synagogues, together with a variety of prayers. 
They use no sacrifices since the destruction of the Temple. 
They repeat blessings and particular praises to God, not 
only in their prayers, but on all accidental occasions, and 
in almost all their actions. They go to prayers three times 
a day in their synagogues. Their sermons are not made 
in Hebrew, which few of them now perfectly understand, 
but in the language of the country where they reside. They 
are forbidden all vain swearing, and pronouncing any of the 
names of God without necessity. They abstain from meats 
prohibited by the Levitical law ; for which reason, what- 
ever they eat must be dressed by Jews, and after a man- 
ner peculiar to themselves. As so >n as a child can speak, 

31 



362 JEWS. 

thej teach him to read and translate the Bible into tne 
language of the country where they live. In general they 
observe the same ceremonies which were practised by their 
ancestors, in the celebration of the passover. They acknow- 
ledge a two-fold law of God, a written and an unwritten 
one; the former is contained in the Pentateuch, or five 
books of Moses ; the latter, they pretend, was delivered by 
God to Moses, and handed down from him by oral tradi- 
tion, and now to be received as of equal authority with the 
former. They assert the perpetuity of their law, together 
with its perfection. They deny the accomplishment of the 
prophecies in the person of Christ ; alleging that the Mes- 
siah is not yet come, and that he will make his appearance 
with the greatest worldly pomp and grandeur, subduing all 
nations before him, and subjecting them to the house of 
Judah. Since the prophets have predicted his mean con- 
dition and sufierings, they confidently talk of two Messiahs ; 
one Ben-Ephraim, whom they grant to be a person of a 
mean and afilicted condition in this world ; and the other, 
Ben-David, who shall be a victorious and powerful prince 

The Jews pray for the souls of the dead, because they 
suppose there is a paradise for the souls of good men, where 
they enjoy glory in the presence of God. They believe 
that the souls of the wicked are tormented in hell with fire 
and other punishments ; that some are condemned to be 
punished in this manner forever, while others continue only 
for a limited time ; and this they call 'purgatory, which is 
not difi'erent from hell in respect of the place, but of the 
duration. They suppose no Jew, unless guilty of heresy, 
or certain crimes specified by the rabbins, shall continue 
in purgatory above a twelvemonth ; and that there are but 
few who sufi*er eternal punishment. 

Almost all the modern Jews are Pharisees, and are as 
much attached to tradition as their ancestors were ; and 



JEWS. 



363 



assert that wlioevrer rejects the oral law deserves death. 
Hence thej entertain an implacable hatred to the Caraites, 
who adhere to the text of Moses, rejecting the rabbinistical 
interpretation. 

There are still some of the Sadducees in Africa, and in 
Beveral other places ; but they are few in number : at least 
there are but very few who declare openly for these opinions. 

There are to this day some remains of the ancient sect 
of the Samaritans, who are zealous for the law of Moses, 
but are despised by the Jews, because they receive only 
the Pentateuch, and observe different ceremonies from 
theirs. They declare they are no Sadducees, but acknow- 
ledge the spirituality and immortality of the soul. There 
are numbers of this sect at Gaza, Damascus, Grand Cairo, 
and in some other places of the east ; but especially at 
Sichem, now called Naplouse, which is risen out of the 
ruins of the ancient Samaria, where they sacrificed not 
many years ago, having a place for this purpose on Mount 
Gerizim. 

David Levi, a learned Jew, who in 1796 published 
" Dissertations on the Prophecies of the Old Testament," 
observes in that work that Deism and infidelity have mad 
such large strides' in the world, that they have at length 
reached even to the Jewish nation; many of whom are at 
this time so greatly infected with scepticism, by reading 
Bolingbroke, Hume, Voltaire, &c., that they scarcely be- 
lieve in a revelation ; much less have they any hope in their 
future restoration. 

3. Calamities of the Jews. — All history cannot furnish 
us with a parallel to the calamities and miseries of the Jews ; 
rapine and murder, famine and pestilence, within ; fire and 
Bword, and all the terrors of war, without. Our Saviour 
wept at the foresight of these calamities ; and it is almost 
impossible for persons of any humanity to read the account 



364 



JEWS. 



without being affected. The predictions concerning them 
were remarkable, and the calamities that came upon them 
were the greatest the world ever saw. Dent, xxviii., xxix. ; 
Matt. xxiv. Now, what heinous sin was it that could be 
the cause of such heavy judgments ? Can any other be 
assigned than what the Scripture assigns ? 1 Thess. ii. 
15, 16. They both killed the Lord Jesus and their own 
prophets, and persecuted the apostles : and so filled up 
their sins, and wrath came upon them to the uttermost." 
It is hardly possible to consider the nature and extent of 
their sufferings, and not conclude the Jews' own impreca 
tion to be singularly fulfilled upon them. Matt, xxvii. 25. 
" His blood be on us and our children." At Cesarea twenty 
thousand of the Jews were killed by the Syrians in their 
mutual broils. At Damascus ten thousand unarmed Jews 
were killed; and at Bethshan the heathen inhabitants 
caused their Jewish neis-hbors to assist them asiainst their 
brethren, and then murdered thirty thousand of these in 
habitants. At Alexandria the Jews murdered multitudes 
of the heathens, and were murdered in their turn to about 
fifty thousand. The Romans under Vespasian invaded the 
country, and took the cities of Galilee, Chorazen, Beth- 
Baida, Capernaum, &c., where Christ had been especially 
rejected, and murdered numbers of the inhabitants. At 
Jerusalem the scene was most wretched of all. At the 
passover, when there might be two or three millions of 
people in the city, the Romans surrounded it with troops, 
trenches, and walls, that none might escape. The three 
different factions within murdered one another. Titus, one 
of the most merciful generals that ever breathed, did all in 
his power to persuade them to an advantageous surrender, 
but they scorned every proposal. The multitudes of un- 
buried carcases corrupted the air, and produced a pesti- 
lence. The people fed on one another ; and even ladies, 



JEWS. 



365 



it is said, broiled their sucking infants, and ate them. 
After a siege of six months, the city was taken. They 
murdered almost every Jew they met with. Titus was bent 
to save the Temple, but could not : there were six thousand 
Jews who had taken shelter in it, all burnt or murdered ! 
The outcries of the Jews, when they saw it, were most 
dreadful : the whole city, except three towers and a small 
part of the wall, were razed to the ground, and the foun- 
dations of the temple and other places were ploughed up. 
Soon after the forts of Herodian and Macheron were taken, 
the garrison of Massada murdered themselves rather than 
surrender. At Jerusalem alone, it is said, one million one 
hundred thousand perished by sword, famine, and pesti- 
lence. In other places we hear of two hundred and fifty 
thousand that were cut off, besides vast numbers sent to 
Egypt to labor as slaves. About fifty years after, the Jews 
murdered about five hundred thousand of the Roman sub- 
I'ects, for which they were severely punished by Trajan. 
About 130, one Barocaba pretended that he was the Mes- 
siah, and raised a Jewish army of two hundred thousand, 
who murdered all the heathens and Christians who came 
in their "way ; but he was defeated by Adrian's forces. In 
this war, it is said, about sixty thousand Jews were slain 
and perished. Adrian built a city on Mount Calvary, and 
erected a marble statue of swine over the gate that led to 
Bethlehem. No Jew was allowed to enter the city, or to 
look to it at a distance, under pain of death. In 360, they 
began to rebuild their city and temple ; but a terrible earth- 
quake and flames of fire issuing from the earth, killed the 
workmen, and scattered their materials. Nor till the 
seventh century durst they so much as creep over the rub- 
bish to bewail it, without bribing the guards. In the third, 
fourth, and fifth jenturies, there were many of them furi- 
ously harassed and murdered. In the sixth century, twenty 

31* 



366 



JEWS. 



thousand of them were slain, and as many taken and so\d 
for slaves. In 602, they were severely punished for theii 
\orrible massacre of the Christians at Antioch. In Spain, 
in 700, they were ordered to be enslaved. In the eighth 
and ninth centuries, they were greatly derided and abused : 
in some places they were made to wear leathern girdles, 
and ride without stirrups on asses and mules. In France 
and Spain they were much insulted. In the tenth, eleventh, 
and twelfth centuries, their miseries rather increased : they 
were greatly persecuted in Egypt. Besides what they suf- 
fered in the East by the Turkish and sacred war, it is 
shocking to think what multitudes of them the eight cru- 
sades murdered in Germany, Hungary, Lesser Asia, and 
elsewhere. In France, multitudes were burnt. In Eng- 
land, in 1020, they were banished ; and at the coronation 
of Richard I. the mob fell upon them, and murdered a great 
many of them. About one thousand and five hundred of 
them were burnt in the palace in the city of York, which 
:hey set fire to themselves, after killing their wives and 
children. In the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries their 
condition was no better. In Egypt, Canaan, and Syria, 
the crusaders still harassed them. Provoked with their 
mad running after pretended Messiahs, Caliph Nassei 
scarce left any of them alive in his dominions of Mesopo- 
tamia. In Persia, the Tartars murdered them in multi- 
tudes. In Spain, Ferdinand persecuted them furiously. 
About 1349, the terrible massacre of them at Toledo forced 
many of them to murder themselves, or change their reli- 
gion. About 1253, many were murdered, and others ban- 
ished from France, but in 1275 recalled. In 1320 and 
1330, the crusades of the fanatic shepherds, who wasted 
the south of France, massacred them ; besides fifteen hun- 
dred that were murdered on another occasion. In- 1358, 
they were totally banished from France, since whicb few 



JEWS. 



367 



of thefa have entered that country. In 1291, king Edward 
expelled them from England, to the number of one hundred 
and sixty thousand. In the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seven- 
teenth centuries, their miseries continued. In Persia they 
have been terribly used : from 1663 to 1666, the murder 
of them was so universal, that but a few escaped to Turkey. 
In Portugal and Spain, they have been miserably handled. 
About 1392, six or eight hundred thousand were banished 
from Spain. Some were drowned in their passage to Africa, 
some died by hard usage, and many of their carcasses lay in 
the fields till the wild beasts devoured them. In Germany 
they have endured many hardships. They have been ban- 
ished from Bohemia, Bavaria, Cologne, Nuremberg, Augs- 
burgh, and Vienna : they have been terribly massacred in 
Moravia, and plundered in Bonn and Bamberg. Except 
in Portugal and Spain, their present condition is generally 
tolerable. In Holland, Poland, and at Frankfort and Ham- 
burgh, they have their liberty. They have repeatedly, but 
till lately in vain, attempted to obtain a naturalization in 
England, and other nations among whom they are scattered 
4. Preservation of the Jews. — " The preservation of the 
Jews," says Basnage, ''in the midst of the miseries whiclj 
they have undergone during 1700 years, is the greatest 
prodigy that can be imagined. Eeligions depend on tem- 
poral prosperity ; they triumph under the protection of a 
conqueror : they languish and sink with sinking monarchies. 
Paganism, which once covered the earth, is extinct. The 
Christian church, glorious in its martyrs, yet was considera- 
bly diminished by the persecutions to which it was exposed ; 
nor was it easy to repair the breaches in it made by those 
acts of violence. But here we behold a church hated and per- 
secuted for 1700 years, and yet sustaining itself, and widely 
extended. Kings have often employed the severity of edicts 
and the hand of executioners to ruin it. The seditious mul- 



368 



JEWS 



titudes, by murders and massacres, have committed out- 
rages against it still more violent and tragical. Princes 
and people, Pagans, Mahometans, Christians, disagreeing 
in so many things, have united in the design of extermi* 
nating it, and have not been able to succeed. The hush 
of Moses, surrounded with flames, ever burns, and is never 
consumed. The Jews have been expelled, in different times, 
from every part of the world, which hath only served to 
spread them in all regions. From age to age they have 
been exposed to misery and persecution ; yet still they 
subsist, in spite of the ignominy and the hatred which hath 
pursued them in all places, whilst the greatest monarchies 
are fallen, and nothing remains of them besides the name. 

" The judgments which God has exercised upon this 
people are terrible, extending to the men, the religion, and 
the very land in which they dwelt. The ceremonies essen- 
tial to their religion can no more be observed ; the ritual 
law, which cast a splendor on the national worship, and 
struck the pagans so much that they sent their presents 
and their victims to Jerusalem, is absolutely fallen, for 
they have no temple, no altar, no sacrifices. Their land 
itself seems to lie under a never-ceasing curse. Pagans, 
Christians, Mohammedans, in a word, almost all nations, 
have by turns seized and held Jerusalem. To the Jew 
only hath God refused the possession of this small tract 
of ground, so supremely necessary for him, since he ought 
to worship on this mountain. A Jewish writer hath af- 
firmed that it is long since any Jew has been seen settled 
near Jerusalem ; scarcely can they purchase there six feet 
of land for a burying-place. 

In all this there is no exaggeration : I am only point- 
ing out known facts ; and, far from having the least design 
to raise an odium against the nation from its miseries, I 
conclude that it ought to be looked upon as one of those 



JEWS. 



369 



prodigies whicl] we admire without compreliending ; since, 
in spite of evils sc durable, and a patience so long exer- 
cised, it is preserved by a particular providence. The 
Jew ought to be weary of expecting a Messiah who so 
unkindly disappoints his vain hopes; and the Christian 
ought to have his attention and his regard excited towards 
men whom God preserves, for so great a length of time, 
under calamities which would have been the total ruin of 
any other people." 

5. Numher and Dispersion of the Jews. — They are looked 
upon to be as numerous at present as they were formerly 
in the land of Canaan. Some have rated them at three 
millions, and others more than double that number. Their 
dispersion is a remarkable particular in this people. They 
Bwarm all over the east, and are settled, it is said, in the 
remotest parts of China. The Turkish empire abounds 
with them. There are more of them at Constantinople 
and Salonichi than in any other place. They are spread 
through most of the nations of Europe and Africa, and 
many families of them are established in the West Indies ; 
not to mention whole nations bordering on Prester John's 
country, and some discovered in the inner parts of Ame- 
rica, if we may give any credit to their own writers. 
Their being always in rebellions (as Addison observes) 
while they had the Holy Temple in view, has excited most 
nations to banish them. Besides, the whole people are 
now a race of such merchants as are wanderers by profes- 
sion ; and at the same time are in most, if not in all 
places, incapable of holding either lands or offices, that 
might engage them to make any part of the world their 
home. In addition to this, we may consider what provi- 
dential reasons may be assigned for their numbers and 
dispersion. Their firm adherence to their religion, and 
being dispersed all over the earth, has furnislied every age 

Y 



370 



JEWS. 



and every nation with the strongest arguments for the 
Christian faith ; not only as these very particulars are 
foretold of them, but as they themselves are the deposita- 
ries of these and all other prophecies which tend to their 
own confusion and the establishment of Christianity, 
Their number furnishes us with a sufficient cloud of wit- 
nesses that attest the truth of the Bible, and their disper- 
sion spreads these witnesses through all parts of the world. 

The number of Jews in the United States does not prob- 
ably exceed 75,000, of whom perhaps 45,000 may be or- 
thodox or of orthodox families ; possibly 5000 belong to 
the Eeformed or Eationalistic Jews, and the remainder 
have either become Christians or do not identify them- 
selves with any religious organization. 

6. Restoration of Jews. — From the declarations of Scrip- 
ture, we have reason to suppose the Jews shall be called to 
a participation of the blessings of the Gospel (Rom. xi. ; 
2 Cor. iii. 16 ; Hos. i. 11) ; and some suppose shall return 
to their own land (Hos. iii. 5 ; Isa. Ixv. 17, etc.*; Ezek. 
xxxvi.). Let us, however, avoid putting stumbling-blocks 
in their way. If we attempt anything for their conver- 
sion, let it be with peace and love. Let us, says one, pro- 
pose Christianity to them, as Christ proposed it to them. 
Let us lay before them their own prophecies. Let us show 
them their accomplishment in Jesus. Let us applaud their 
hatred of idolatry. Let us show them the morality of 
Jesus in our lives and tempers. Let us never abridge 
their civil liberty, nor ever try to force their consciences. 



UiTITED BRETHREN IN CHRIST. 



371 



UNITED BEETHEEN IN CHEIST. 

This large and respectable society is frequently mis- 
taken for the Moravians, but is entirely distinct from 
them, being founded, near the close of the eighteenth 
century, by Eev. Wm. Otteebein, a learned minister 
of the German Eeformed Church. Mr. Otter bein was 
born in Germany, but came to this country in 1752. 
Not long afterward, impressed by the study of the Scrip- 
tures with the need of the New Birth, taught by Christ 
as the source of all spiritual life, he first sought that 
blessing for himself ; and, having found it, began earn- 
estly to enforce its necessity upon others, however familiar 
they might be, as he had been, with the religion of forms 
and education. Numbers of professing Christians were 
soon roused from apathy and false security, to an active 
interest in spiritual things. Meetings were appointed on 
week evenings, not only for preaching, but for prayer 
and religious conversation — things common now, but 
then counted '"'strange things," among his denomination. 
Otterbein also adopted and spread the new idea that all 
true Christians, of whatever name, should unite at the 
Lord^s table. For these innovations on established order, 
the Synod called him to account, tried him, and though it 
never formally excommunicated him, nearly every pulpit 
was henceforth closed against him. 

Though sorely pained at these proceedings, Mr. Otter- 
bein was not silenced or dismayed. He resorted to the 
fields and private houses ; even the barn was welcome as 
a place to preach the Gospel. He travelled extensively, 
and success attended his labors. Many joined him from 
other denominations, and such was the concord between 
them, that they agreed to take the name they now bear, 
of United Brethren in Christ." 



372 



UNITED BRETHREN IN CHRIST. 



Mr. Asbury, sent out to this country by Mr. Wesley to 
form churches, labored in company with them for some 
time, they preaching in German, and he in English. 
Hence they were called "German Methodists," though 
they preferred an organization of their own. Some steps 
v/ere taken to this end in 1789, at a conference held in Bal - 
timore, Md., but nothing effectual was done until 1 800, when 
an organization was formed, and Otterbein and, ^Martin 
Eoehm were chosen the first superintendents or Bishops. 

The society throve rapidly, both in preachers and people, 
but was confined for a number of years to the German 
jDopulation. Their "Discipline" was adopted in their 
General Conference at Mount Pleasant, Pa., in 1815. 
They are distinguished by no new doctrines, but by an 
organization in which the ministers and people have an 
equal proportion of power, and the rulers hold office only 
by the aut'hority and consent of the governed. Their eccle- 
siastical courts consist of Quarterly, Annual and General 
Conferences ; and their officers of ordained elders, who 
alone exercise the functions of the ministry ; class-leaders ; 
stewards, who attend to the pecuniary wants of the minis- 
ters ; preachers in charge, who have the oversight of one 
circuit ; presiding elders ; and bishops, who have the gen- 
eral superintendence of the Church. Their ministry is 
earnest, quiet and devoted to the salvation of souls. 

They allow, but do not enjoin, the washing of feet. They 
oppose all secret societies, intemperance and slavery, and 
are zealous in supporting missions. 

In 1873 they had 4 bishops, about 4000 churches, 1890 
ministers and 127,561 members. They had 1681 church 
edifices, worth $2,054,000; 2739 Sunday-schools, with 
157,197 scholars; 1 theological seminary, 5 colleges and 2 
academies; benevolent contributions, $720,751.07. 



PELAGIANS. 



373 



PELAGIANS. 

Pelagianism is that theological view which denies the 
total corruption of men, attributed to the fall of Adam 
(original sin), and declares man's natural capacity suffi- 
cient for the exercise of Christian duties and virtues, pro- 
vided he have but an earnest purpose to do well. It does 
not exclude faith in divine assistance towards man's im- 
provement, but believes this assistance will be granted to 
those only who strive to improve themselves. This view 
was broached by the English monk Pelagius, who, in the 
fifth century, resided in Kome, with the reputation of great 
learning and an unspotted life, and fled from that city 
when it was taken by the Goths, in 409, with his friend 
Coelestus, to Sicily, and thence to Africa, where Augus- 
tine declared him a heretic ; in which several African 
synods concurred. Pelagius travelled to Jerusalem, and 
there closed his life in tranquillity, in the year 420, at the 
age of ninety years. The philosophical soundness and 
noble frankness of his writings, together with his own 
great virtue in a time of universal and deep-rooted corrup- 
tion, procured many adherents to his opinions, which at all 
times have been considered, by some of the purest and 
most reflecting men, as the only ones worthy of the Deity. 
He never attempted to found a heretical or dissenting 
Beet, yet the Pelagians, whose views were formally con- 
demned at the Council of Ephesus, in 431, and the Semi- 
Pelagians, founded by John Cassianus at Marseilles (died 
in 435), who somewhat modified the orthodox dogma of the 
utter insufficiency of man's nature for virtue, occupy a verj 
'mportant place in ecclesiastical history. 

32 



374 



EUTYCHIAN3. 



EUTYCHIANS. 

The Eutychians were a sect of Christians which began 
in the east in the fifth century. Eutyches, its reputed 
founder, though the opinions attributed to him are said to 
have existed before [de Eutycliiayiismo ante Eutychen^ by 
Christ. Aug. Selig, and also Assemani, BihHotJieca Orien- 
talis, torn, i., p. 219), was a monk who lived near Constan- 
tinople, and had a great reputation for austerity and sanc- 
tity. He was already advanced in years when he came 
out of his retirement, A. D. 448, in order to oppose the 
Nestorians, who were accused of teaching " that the divine 
nature was not incarnate in, but only attendant on, Jesus, 
being superadded to his human nature after the latter was 
formed;" an opinion, however, which Nestorius himself 
had disavowed. In his zeal for opposing the error ascribed 
to the Nestorians, Eutyches ran into the opposite extreme 
of saying that in Christ there was " only one nature, that 
of the incarnate Word," his human nature having been 
absorbed in a manner by his divine nature. 

Eusebius, Bishop of Dorylaeum, who had already op- 
posed the Nestorians, denounced Eutyches before a council 
assembled at Constantinople by Flavianus, bishop of that 
city. That assembly condemned Eutyches, who, being 
supported by friends at the court of Theodosius II., ap- 
pealed to a general council, which was soon after convoked 
by the emperor at Ephesus, A. D. 449, under the presi- 
dency of Dioscorus, Bishop of Alexandria, and successor 
to the famous Cyril, who had himself broached a doctrine 
very similar to that of Eutyches. 

The majority of the council tumultuously a^cquitted Eu- 



EUTYCHIANS. 



375 



tycbes, and condemned Flavianus ; the bishops opposed to 
him were obliged to escape, and Flavianus was cruelly 
scourged bj the soldiers. It was, in short, a scene of dis- 
graceful violence, which earned for the Council of Ephe- 
sus the name of "a meeting of robbers.'* 

Flavianus appealed to Leo the Great, Bishop of Rome, 
who, in his answer, condemned the doctrine of Eutjches, 
but could not obtain of Theodosius the convocation of 
unother council. After the death of that emperor, his 
successor, Marcianus, convoked a council at Chalcedon, 
A. D. 451, which is reckoned as the fourth oecumenical 
council of the Church, and which the Pope's legates at- 
tended. By this assembly the acts of the Council of Ephe- 
sus were annulled, Dioscorus was deposed and banished, 
and Eutyches, who had already been banished by the em- 
peror, was again condemned, and deprived of his sacer- 
dotal office. 

The doctrine was at the same time expounded that " in 
Christ two distinct natures are united in one person, and 
that without any change, mixture, or confusion." Euty- 
ches died in exile ; but several monks, especially in Syria, 
continued the schism, and having found a protectress in the 
Empress Eudocia, the widow of Theodosius, who was liv- 
ing in Palestine, they became more daring, and excited 
the people against the partisans of the Council of Chalce- 
don, whom they stigmatized as Nestorians. The emperor 
was obliged to send troops to repress these disorders. 

The doctrine of Eutyches was perpetuated in the east 
tinder certain modifications, or rather quibbling of words, 
which caused the sect to be subdivided under various 
names, all, however, comprehended under the general 
name of Monophysites, or believers in one nature. In the 
sixth century a fresh impulse vras given to the Eutychian 
doctrine by one Jacob, a monk, surnamed Baradaeus, who 



376 



EUTYCHIANS. 



reconciled the various divisions of the Monophysitos 
throughout the east, and spread their tenets through Syria, 
Armenia, Mesopotamia, and Egypt, found supporters 
among several prelates (among others in the Bishop of 
Alexandria), and died himself Bishop of Edessa, A. D. 
688. He was considered as the second founder of the 
Monophysites, who assumed from him the name of Jacob- 
ites, under which appellation they still constitute a very 
immerous church, equally separate from the Greek, the 
Roman or Latin, and the Nestorian churches. The Ar- 
menians and the Copts are Jacobites, and so are likewise 
many Syrian Christians in contradistinction to the Melch- 
ites, who belong to the Greek Church. Jacobite congre- 
gations are found in Mesopotamia. 

The Monothelites who appeared in the seventh century 
have been considered as an. offshoot of the Eutychians or 
Monophysites, though they pretended to be quite uncon- 
Tiected with them. They admitted the two natures in 
Christ, explaining that after the union of the two into one 
person, there was in him only one will and one operation. 
This was an attempt to conciliate the Monophysites with 
the orthodox church, and it succeeded for a time. It was 
approved of by many eastern prelates, and even by Pope 
llonorius I., in two epistles to Sergius, patriarch of Con 
Btantinople, which are found in the Acts of the Councils 
But the successors of Honorius condemned the Monothe 
lites, and Martin I., in a bull of excommunication, A. D. 
649, consigned them and their patrons (meaning the Em- 
peror Constans, who protected them) " to the devil and his 
angels." Constans, indignant at this, caused his exarch 
in Italy to arrest Martin, and send him prisoner to the 
Chersonesus. At last, under Constantine, who succeeded 
Constans, the Council of Constantinople, which is the 



FIFTH MONARCHY MEN. 



377 



sixtli oecumenical council, A. D. 680, condemned the Mo- 
DLOthelites, and with them Pope Honorius himself. 



EIFTH MONAECHY MEN, 

A SECT of religionists, whose distinguishing tenet was a 
belief in the fifth universal monarchy, of which Jesua 
Christ was to be the head, while the saints, under his per- 
sonal sovereignty, should possess the earth. They ap< 
peared in England towards the close of the Protectorate ; 
and in 1660, a few months after the Restoration, they 
broke out into a serious tumult in London under their 
leader Yenner, in which many of them lost their lives, 
some being killed by the military, and others afterwards 
executed. Several Fifth Monarchy Men also suffered 
death in 1662, on a charge (most probably unfounded) of 
having conspired to kill the King and the Duke of York, 
to seize the Tower, etc. They are the same who were 
sometimes called Millenarians, their notion being that the 
reign of Christ upon earth was to last for a thousand 
years. They seem also, from the extravagance and vio- 
lence of conduct into which they occasionally broke out, 
to have been confounded, in the popular imagination, with 
the old Anabaptists of Miinster. 

32* 



378 FRATBICELLI. 



FEATRICELLI. 

Fratricelli, or Little Bretliren, also called Fratres de 
paupere vita, a religious sect wliicli arose in Italy towards 
the end of the thirteenth century. They were Franciscan 
monks, who separated themselves from the grand commu- 
nity of St. Francis, with the intention of obeying the laws 
of their founder in a more rigorous manner than they 
were observed by the other Franciscans. They accord- 
ingly renounced every kind of property, both common and 
individual, and begged from door to door their daily sub- 
sistence, alleging that neither Christ nor his Apostles had 
any possessions, either individual or in common ; and that 
these were the models which St. Francis had commanded 
ihem to imitate. They went about clothed in rags, de- 
claiming against the vices of the Pope and the bishops, 
and foretold the reformation of the Church and the resto- 
ration of the true gospel of Christ, by the real followers 
of St. Francis. As the Franciscan order acknowledges 
for its companions a set of men who observe the third rule 
prescribed by St. Francis, and were therefore commonly 
called Tertiarii ; so likewise the order of the Fratricelh, 
who were anxious to be considered as the only true fol- 
lowers of St. Francis, had a great number of Tertiarii 
attached to their cause. These Tertiarii, or half-monks, 
were called in Italy Bizochi or Bocazoi, in France Be- 
guins, in Germany Beg.wards or Beghards. This last 
appellation was generally applied to them. The Tertiarii 
differed from the Fratricelli, not in their opinions, but only 
in their manner of living. The Fratricelli were real 
monks, subject to the rule of St. Francis, whilst the BizO' 



PRATRICELLI. 



379 



chi or Beghards, as well as the Franciscan Tertiarii, ex- 
cepting their dirty hahit^, and certain maxims and obser- 
vances which they followed in compliance with the rules 
of their patron saint, lived after the manner of other 
men. and were therefore considered as laymen. The Beg- 
hards were divided into two classes, the perfect and the 
imperfect. The first lived on alms, abstained from mar- 
riage, and had no fixed dwellings ; the second had houses, 
wives, and possessions, and were engaged in the common 
avocations of life like other people. Pope Celestin Y. 
was favorably disposed to the Fratricelli, and permitted 
them to constitute themselves into a separate order. They 
were submissive to that Pope, but they violently oppo&ed 
his successor, Boniface VIII., and subsequent Popes who 
persecuted their sect. The Fratricelli were accused of 
great enormities, and persecuted by the court of Rome ; 
but they found protection from princes, nobles, and towns, 
who respected them on account of the austerity of their 
devotion. The Fratricelli did not always submit with the 
meekness of the first Christian martyrs to their persecu- 
tors, but frequently opposed force to force, and even put 
to d^ath some inquisitors in Italy. This sect continued 
during the fourteenth century, and spread as far as Bohe- 
mia, Silesia, and Poland. The members of it were most 
severely persecuted in the fifteenth century, and many of 
them fled from France to England and Ireland. All the 
persecutions directed against the sect did not, however, 
extinguish it ; and some remnants of it existed till the 
Reformation of Luther, whose doctrines they embraced. 
Their name is supposed to have been derived from Fratri- 
cellus or Fraterculus, an Italian nickname which was ap- 
plied in the middle ages to all persons who, without be- 
longing to any religious order, assumed a sanctimonious 
appearance. 



380 



PIETISTS.— 



&1ANICH.EANS. 



PIETISTS. 

Pietists is the name given in the seventeenth century 
to a kind of German Methodists or Evangelicals, who, 
being members of the Lutheran Church, were dissatisfied 
with the cold dogmatism of the generality of its clergy, 
and felt the want of a revival of religious feeling and of 
practical piety and charity. Without separating them- 
selves from the church, they instituted meetings called 
" Collegia Pietatis," from which the denomination of Pietists 
was derived. Philip Jacob Spener, a divine of the 
Lutheran Church, who was preacher at Frankfort, and 
afterwards at Dresden and Berlin, was the chief promoter 
of these meetings, which began about 1670. He wrote 
several ascetic works, and died in 1705. A spirit similar 
to that of the Pietists of Germany has arisen in our own 
times in the Swiss and French Protestant churches, and 
the promoters of it, after suffering considerable annoyance 
from the less religious part of the community, have suc- 
ceeded in effecting a revival of evangelical doctrines and 
practice. They have been styled in derision " Momiers'* 
(from momerie, mummery), a name which the great 
majority of them are far from deserving. 



MANICH^ANS. 

The Manichseans were an heretical Christian sect, who 
arrived their name from Mani, as he is called by the 
Persians and Arabians, or Manes or Manichseus, according 
to the Greek and Eoman writers. The particulars of the 



MANICH^. AN3. 



381 



life and death of this individual are variously reported by 
the Greek and Oriental writers ; but it appears from all 
accounts that he was a native of Persia, or at least brought 
up in that country ; that he was well acquainted with the 
doctrines of the Magi ; that he attempted to amalgamate 
the Persian religion with Christianity ; and that after 
meeting with considerable success, he was eventually put 
to death by Yaranes I., king of Persia. It is difficult to 
determine the exact time at which the doctrines of Mani 
were first promulgated in the Roman empire ; but they do 
not appear to have been known before the end of the third 
century or the beginning of the fourth. 

The Manichaeans believed, like the Magi, in two eternal 
principles, from which all things proceed, namely, light 
and darkness, which are respectively subject to the 
dominion of two beings, one the god of good, and the other 
the god of evil. They also believed that the first parents 
of the human race were created by the god of darkness 
with corrupt and mortal bodies, but that their souls formed 
part of that eternal light which w^as subject to the god of 
light. They maintained that it was the great object cf 
the government of the god of light to deliver the captive 
souls of men from their corporeal prisons, and that with 
this view he created two sublime beings, Christ and the 
Holy Ghost, and sent Christ into the world, clothed with 
the shadowy form of a human body, and not with the real 
substance, to teach mortals how to deliver the rational 
soul from the corrupt body, and to overcome the power of 
malignant matter. Referring to the promise of Christ 
shortly before his crucifixion, which is recorded by John 
(xvi. 7-15), that he would send to his disciples the Com- 
forter, ^' who would lead them into all truth," the Mani- 
chaeans maintained that this promise was fulfilled in the 
person of Mani, who was sent by the god of light to declar<^ 



382 



M ANICH^ANS. 



to all men the doctrine of salvation, without conceali 
any of its truths under the veil of metaphor, or under any 
other covering. Mani also taught that those souls which 
obeyed the laws delivered by Christ, as explained by him- 
self the Comforter, and struggled against the lusts and 
appetites of a corrupt nature, would, on their death, be 
delivered from their sinful bodies, and, after being purifiea 
by the sun and moon, would ascend to the regions of light ; 
*>ut that those souls which neglected to struggle against 
their corrupt natures would pass after death into the bodies 
of animals or other beings, until they had expiated their 
guilt. Their belief in the evil of matter led them to deny 
the doctrine of the resurrection. 

Mani entirely rejected the authority of the Old Testa- 
ment, which he had said was the word of the god of dark- 
ness, whom the Jews had worshipped in the place of the 
god of light. He asserted that the books of the New 
Testament had been grossly interpolated ; and that they 
were not all written by the persons whose names they bear. 
The doctrines of the sect were contained in four works, 
said to have been written by Mani himself, which were 
entitled respectively "Mysteries," " Chapters," " Gospel," 
and "Treasury;" but we know little or nothing of their 
contents. 

Bower, in the second volume of his " History of the 
Popes," has attempted to prove that the Manichaeans were 
addicted to immoral practices ; but this opinion has been 
ably controverted by Beausobre and Lardner, who have 
shown that they were, on the contrary, exceedingly rigor- 
ous and austere in their mode of life. 

The disciples of Mani were divided into two classes, one 
of which was called the Elects and the other Hearers 
The former were bound to abstain from animal food, wine, 
\ijad all sensual enjoyments ; the latter were considera^i aa 



MANICHJSANS. 



383 



imperfect and feeble Christians, and were not obliged to 
submit to sucb a severe mode of life. The ecclesiastical 
constitution of the Manichseans consisted of twelve apostles 
and a president, who represented Christ ; of seventy-two 
bishops, who also represented the seventy-two disciples of 
Christ ; and of presbyters and deacons, as in the Catholic 
church. 

The Manichaeans never appear to have been very 
numerous, but they were spread over almost all parts of 
the Christian world. Numerous treatises were written 
against them, the most important of which were by 
Eusebius of Caesarea, Eusebius of Emesa, Serapion of 
Thumis, Athanasius of Alexandria, George and Apolli- 
narius of Laodicea, and Titus of Bostra. Much valuable 
information concerning this sect may be found in the 
writings of Augustine, who was for nine years a zealous 
supporter of the Manichesan doctrines. 

The Paulicians are generally considered to be a branch 
of the Manichsean sect, and are supposed to have appeared 
first in the seventh century in Armenia, and to have 
derived their name from Paul, a zealous preacher of the 
doctrines of Mani. But this is an error. See appendix. 

In the sixth century the Manichsean doctrines are said 
to have spread very widely in Persia. They continued to 
have supporters, under their new name of Paulicianism, 
till a very late period in ecclesiastical history. About the 
middle of the eighth century, the emperor Constantine, 
surnamed Copronymus, transplanted from Armenia a great 
number of Paulicians to Thrace ; where they continued to 
exist even after the capture of Constantinople by the 
Turks. In the eleventh and twelfth centuries, the doc- 
trines of the Paulicians were introduced into Italy and 
France, and met with considerable success. 



384 



MARCIONITES. 



MARCIONITES. 

The Marcionites were a religious sect of the second and 
third centuries of our aera, so called from their teacher 
Marcion, a native of Sinope and a priest, who adopted the 
old Oriental belief of two independent, eternal, co-existing 
principles, one evil and the other good. He endeavored 
to apply this doctrine to Christianity, asserting that our 
souls are emanations of the good principle, but our bodies 
and the whole visible world are the creation of the evil 
genius, who strives to chain down our spiritual nature by 
corporeal fetters, so as to make the soul forget its pure 
and noble origin. He further maintained that the law of 
Moses, with its threats and promises of things terrestrial, 
was a contrivance of the evil principle in order to bind 
men still more to the earth ; but that the good principle, 
in order to dissipate these delusions, sent Jesus Christ, a 
pure emanation of itself, giving him a corporeal appearance 
and a semblance of bodily form, in order to remind men 
of their intellectual nature, and that they cannot expect 
to find happiness until they are reunited to the principle 
of good from which they are derived. Marcion and his 
disciples condemned all pleasures which are not spiritual ; 
they taught that it was necessary to combat every impulse 
that attaches us to the visible world ; they condemned 
marriage, and some of them even regretted the necessity 
of eating of the fruits of the earth, which they believed to 
have been created by the evil principle. The Marcionites 
spread far in the East, and especially in Persia. The 
chief opponent of Marcion was Tertullianus, who wrote a 
book to refute his doctrines. 



M AR0NITE8. 



385 



MAROJNITES. 

Maronites is the name of a community of Christians 
belonging to the Western or Roman church, and living on 
Mount Lebanon. They are the neighbors of, and allied 
to, and in some places mixed with the Druses, and, like 
them, independent, in great measure, of the Turkish 
power. The Maronites occupy the valleys and fastnesses 
of the principal ridge of Lebanon east of Beyroot and 
Tripoli, and they extend inland as far as the Bekaa, oi 
plain between the Libanus and Anti-Libanus, where they 
are mixed with the Druses, though they do not intermarry 
with them. The town of Zhakle, in the valley of Bekaa, 
contains between ten and twelve thousand inhabitants, 
chiefly Maronites. 

There are also many Maronites at Beyroot and Tripoli ^ 
but the tract of country in which the great bulk of the 
Maronites reside is called Kesrouan. It extends along 
the ridge of Libanus from the Nahr el Kelb, a stream 
which enters the sea twelve miles north of Beyroot, to the 
Nahr el Kebir, which enters the sea north of Tripoli, near 
the island of Ruad, the ancient Aradus, on which side the 
Maronites border on the Nosa'iris, or Ansarieh, who extend 
to the northward towards Latakieh, and the Ismaelians, 
who live farther inland, near the banks of the Orontes- 
To the eastward, the Maronites have for neighbors tha 
Metualis, a tribe of independent Moslems, of the sect of 
Ali, who live under their own emir, and occupy the belad 
or district of Baalbek and part of the Anti-Libanus ; and 
on the south they border on the territory of the Druses, 
with whom they form one political body, being subject to * 
the Emir Beschir, in so far as they join him when he calls 

33 Z 



386 



M ARONITES. 



them to arms for the common defence, and pay him their 
ehare of the tribute, which the emir paid formerly to the 
Porte, and nm pays to the pasha of Egypt. But in their 
internal concerns the Maronites are governed by their 
own sheiks, of whom there is one in every village, from 
whose decision there is an appeal to the bishops, who have 
great authority; and in some cases to the emir of the 
Druses, and his divan or council. 

The clergy are very numerous ; the secular parish 
clergy are married, as in the Greek church ; but the 
regular clergy, who are said to amount to 20,000, and are 
distributed among about 200 convents, follow the rule of 
St. Anthony, and are bound by vows of chastity and 
obedience. The Maronite monks are not idle ; they cul- 
tivate the land belonging to their convents, and live by its 
produce. Every convent is a farm. The convents are 
under the jurisdiction of bishops, of whom there is one in 
every large village. The bishops are under the obligation 
of celibacy. The bishops collectively elect the patriarch, 
who is conjSrmed by the pope, and who resides at the 
convent of Kanobin, in a valley of the Libanus, south-east 
of Tripoli, where there is a printing-press, which furnishes 
the elementary books for the use of the Maronite schools. 

Not far from Kanobin is the large village of Eden, ten 
miles above which, and high up the Libanus, is the famed 
clump of old cedars, called the " Cedars of Solomon," of 
large dimensions, but now reduced to seven in number 
(Lamartine, Voyage en Orient ; Richardson), not including 
the younger and smaller ones. Dr. Richardson measured 
the trunk of one of the old trees, and found it thirty-two 
feet in circumference. The whole clump of old and young 
trees may be walked round in about half an hour. Old 
^ cedars are not found in any other part of Libanus. 

At the opposite or southern extremity of the Kesrouan 



MARONITES. 



387 



is the handsome convent of Antoura, which is the ix^sidetice 
of the papal legate and of some European missionaries. 
Near it is a convent of Maronite nuns. 

The Maronites derive their name from a monk of the 
name of Maro, who, in the fifth century, collected a number 
of followers, and founded several convents in these moun- 
tains. When the Monothelite heresy prevailed in the East 
in the seventh century, and was favored by the court o *' 
Constantinople, many Christians who did not embrace its 
tenets took refuge in the fastnesses of Libanus, around the 
convents, and thus the name of Maronites was assumed by 
the population of the mountains. This is the account of 
the Maronites themselves ; others pretend that the Maro- 
nites were Monothelites, who took refuge in the Libanus 
after the Emperor Anastasius 11. had condemned and pro- 
scribed their sect, in the beginning of the eighth century. 
Joseph Simonius Assemani, and his friend Ambarach, 
better known as Father Benedetti, have defended the 
Maronites from the «^harge of Monothelitism. Ambarach 
translated from the Arabic into Latin the work of Stephen, 
patriarch of Antioch, concerning the origin and liturgy of 
the Maronites. In 1736, at a great synod held at Mar- 
hanna, the Maronite church formally acknowledged the 
canons of the Council of Trent, but they retained the mass 
in the Syriac language, and the marriage of the priests. 
Before that time they received the sacrament under both 
forms, as in the Greek church. At mass the priest turns 
towards the congregation and reads the gospel of the day 
in Arabic, which is the vulgar tongue. 

The Maronite population is said to be above 200,000 
individuals, and to contain between thirty and forty thou- 
sand men fit for military service. Every Maionite is 
armed, and they are all soldiers in case of need. Volney 
reckoned them, in 1784, a* 120,000, but the population 



388 



CALVINISTS. 



has been rapidly increasing since that time. Their Ian 
guage is Arabic, and by their appearance and habits the^ 
belong to the Arabian race. They are a fine-looking 
people, high-spirited, civil, and hospitable, especially 
towards European travellers, and perfectly honest. Rob- 
bery and other acts of violence are hardly known among 
them. They are altogether an interesting race, full of 
vigor, and perhaps destined with the Druses to act an 
important part in the future vicissitudes of Syria. (Jowett, 
Light, Lamar tine, and other travellers in Syria.) 

There is at Rome, on the Quirinal Mount, a convent of 
Maronite monks, who perform the service of the mass in 
the Syriac language, according to the liturgy of their 
country. This church was founded by Pope Gregory 
XIII., and is dedicated to St. John. The monastery 
serves as a college for young Maronites who come to 
Rome to study and take orders, after which they return 
to their own country. It is one of those exotic colonies 
which give a peculiar interest to the city of Rome. 

The ceremonies of these Maronites of Rome on great 
festivals, their chanting in Syriac, and their curious 
musical mstruments, are described by the Abbd Richard, 
in his "Voyage en Italie." 



CALVINISTS. 

The followers of the religious doctrine and Church 
government instituted by Calvin. Calvin published his 
system in his Christian Institutes," in the year 1536; 
but it does not appear to have obtained the name of Cal- 
vinism, nor its supporters the name of Calvinists, till the 
conference cf Poissy, in 1561. The reformer was not 



CAL VINISTS. 



389 



himself present at that assembly, being prevented fronj 
attending by bis local duties and the ill state of his health ; 
but we see from his correspondence with Beza, the deputy 
from Geneva, how deep was his interest in its proceedings, 
and that nothing was done on the part of the reformers 
without his knowledge and advice. In the debate which 
took place on the Augsburg Confession, the points of differ- 
ence between the Lutherans and Calvinists were drawL 
out; and they were such as that from thenceforth the 
latter became known as a distinct sect under that denomi- 
nation. 

The tenets of Calvinism respect the doctrines of the 
Trinity, predestination, or particular election and repro- 
bation, original sin, particular redemption, effectual or 
irresistible grace in regeneration, justification by faith, and 
the perseverance of Saints ; together also with the govern- 
ment and discipline of the Church, the nature of the 
eucharist, and the qualification of those entitled to partake 
of it. The great leading principles of the system, how 
ever, are the absolute decrees of God, the spiritual pres 
ence of Christ in the eucharist, and the independence of 
the Church. 

Calvinism was, perhaps, like Lutheranism, exemplified 
first at Strasburg ; where, in the year 1538, Calvin esta- 
blished a French church on his own plan. But it was at 
Geneva the system was seen in all its vigor; and from 
thence it spread into France, Germany, Prussia, the United 
Provinces, England and Scotland. To this last place it 
was carried by Knox, the disciple and intimate correspond- 
ent of Calvin ; and as within the little territory of Geneva 
there was neither room nor need for the parochial sessions, 
presbyteries, provincial synods, and general assembly, into 
which the presbyterial government expands itself in a large 
community, we shall briefly advert to its leading features 

33* 



390 



CAL VINISl S. 



in Scotland, as it appeared there in the lifetime of Knox. 
We shall thus, indeed, see the Church of Scotland in its 
infancy ; but, at the same time, — and it is this we have 
chiefly in view, — we shall thus, perhaps, have the best idea 
of the matured opinions of the great reformer. 

The Confession of Faith, ratified by the Scotch parlia- 
ment in 1560, declares * that by the sin of our first parents, 
" commonly called original sin, the image of God was 
utterly defaced in man, and he and his posterity of nature 
became enemies of God, slaves to Satan, and servants unto 
sin ; insomuch that death everlasting has had, and shall 
have, power and dominion over all that have not been, are 
not, or shall not be, regenerated from above, which regene- 
ration is wrought by the power of the Holy Ghost working 
in the hearts of the elect of God an assured faith in the 
promise of God revealed in his word ; that " from the 
eternal and immutable decree of God all our salvation 
springs and depends ;" " God of mere grace electing us in 
Christ Jesus his Son before the foundation of the world 
was laid and that " our faith and the assurance of the 
same proceeds not from flesh and blood, that is to say, 
from our natural powers within us, but is the inspiration 
of the Holy Ghost;" "who sanctifies us and brings us in 
all verity by his own operation, without whom we should 
remain for ever enemies to God and ignorant of his son 
Christ Jesus ; for of nature we are so dead, so blind, and 
so perverse, that neither can we feel when we are pricked, 
see the light when it shines, nor assent to the will of God 
when it is revealed, unless the spirit of the Lord Jesus 
quicken that which is dead, remove the darkness from our 
minds, and bow our stubborn hearts to the obedience of 
his blessed will ;" " so that the cause of good works we 



We have here modernized the spelling. 



CALVINISTS. 



391 



confess to be not our free will, but the spirit of the Lord 
Jesus, who, dwelling in our hearts by true faith, brings 
forth such works as God has prepared for us to walk in 
and "whoso boast themselves of the merits of their own 
works, or put their trust in works of supererogation, boast 
themselves in that which is not, and put their trust in 
damnable idolatry." It further admits that "we now, in 
the time of the evangel, have two chief sacraments only," 
to wit. Baptism and the Lord's Supper ; by the former of 
which, " we are ingrafted in Christ Jesus to be made par^ 
takers of his justice, by which our sins are covered and 
remitted and in the latter it is asserted there is a real 
though only spiritual presence of Christ, and " in the sup- 
per rightly used, Christ Jesus is joined with us, that he 
becomes very nourishment and food of our souls." The 
marks of a true church are said to be the true preaching 
of the word of God, the right administration of the sacra- 
ments, and ecclesiastical discipline rightly administered as 
the word of God prescribes. The polity or constitution 
of the Church, however, is not detailed ; this was done in 
the "Book of discipline" drawn up by Knox and his 
brethren. The highest Church judicatory is the General 
Assembly, composed of representatives from the others, 
which are provincial synods, presbyteries, and kirk ses- 
sions. The officers of the Church are pastors or ministers, 
doctors or teachers, and lay elders, to which are to be 
added lay deacons, for the care of the poor. Among the 
clergy there is a perfect parity of jurisdiction and autho- 
rity, and in the Church courts clergy and laity have equal 
voices. The minister and the elder indeed are both pres- 
byters — the one a preaching presbyter, and the other a 
ruling presbyter ; and it will be remembered that when 
Bucer expressed his approbation of the episcopal hierarchy 
of England, Calvin said it was only another papacy An- 



392 



MOLINISTS. 



Other principle, recognised alike by Calvin and tlie re- 
formers of Scotland, was the education of the people; 
'vhich both seem to have regarded as the rock upon which 
the Reformed Church should be built ; and in Scotland, as 
was fit, this foundation was as broad as the building, it 
being meant that, besides the universities of the kingdom, 
there should be in every district a parish church and a 
parish school. 



MOLINISTS. 

Louis Molina, born at Cuenga in Castile, entered the 
order of Jesuits in 1553. He studied at Coimbra, became a 
learned divine, and taught theology for twenty years in the 
college of Evora. He died at Madrid in the year 1600. He 
wrote commentaries upon Thomas Aquinas, and a treatise 
"De Justitia et Jure;" but the work which has rendered 
bis name famous as the head of a school of theology is his 
book " De Concordia Gratise et Liberi Arbitrii," printed at 
Lisbon in 1568, with an appendix to it, published after. 
In this work Molina undertook the task of reconciling the 
free-will of man with the foreknowledge of God and predes- 
tination. He observed that the early fathers who had pre- 
ceded the heresy of Pelagius had defined predestination as 
being the foreknowledge of God from all eternity of the 
use which each individual would make of his free-will ; but 
St. Augustine, who had to oppose the Pelagians, who 
granted too much to free-will, spoke of predestination in a 
more absolute and restricted sense. Molina says that man 
requires grace in order to do good, but that God never 
fails 10 grant this grace to those who ask it with fervor. 



MOLINISTS. 



393 



He also asserts that man has it m his power to answer, or 
not, to the calling of grace. 

The opinions of Molina, which were adopted, enlarged, 
and commented upon by the Jesuits, and strongly opposed 
by the Dominicans, gave rise to the long disputes concern- 
ing grace and free-will. The partisans of Molina were 
called Molinists, and their antagonists Thomists, from Tho- 
mas Aquinas, the favorite divine of the Dominican order. 
Already in Molina's lifetime his opinions were stigmatized 
as savoring of Pelagianism. After numerous disputations, 
Pope Paul v., in 1609, forbade both Jesuits and Domini- 
cans from reviving the controversy. But soon after Jan- 
senius, bishop of Ypres, wrote a book in which he dis- 
cussed the question concerning grace after the manner of 
St. Augustine. His book was denounced by the Jesuits, 
and thus the dispute began afresh between the Molinists 
and the Jansenists. Pascal, in his second "Lettre Pro 
vinciale," gives an account of the state of the contro- 
versy in his time. He says that " the Jesuits pretend that 
there is a sufficient grace imparted unto all men, and sub- 
ordinate to their free-will, which can render it active or 
inactive, while the Jansenists maintain that the only suffi- 
cient grace is that which is efficacious, that is to say, which 
determines the will to act effectively. The Jesuits sup- 
port the * sufficient grace,' the Jansenists the 'efficacious 
grace.' " 

Molina must not be confounded with Molinos {Michael)} 
a Spanish clergyman of the seventeenth century, who was 
the founder of the theory of piety and devotion called Qui- 
etism, of which Fenelon and Madame Guyon were distin- 
guished supporters. 



S94 



M N T A N I S T S . 



MONTAXISTS, 

Or CataphryitIAX?. ^vere a sect o;^ Christian?, which arose 
in Phrygia about 171 A. D. They were called Montanisti 
frora their leader Alonranns, and Cataphrygians or Phrv- 
gi:ins. from the country in which they first appeared. 

Of the personal history of Montanus little is known. 
He is said to have been born at Ardaba. a village in Mysia, 
and \o have been only a recent convert when he first made 
pretensions to .ne character of a prophet. His principal 
associates were two prophetesses, named Prisca or Priscilla, 
and Maximilla. According to some of the ancient writers, 
Montanns was believed by his followers to be the Paraclete, 
or Holy Spirit. Probably this is an exaggeration, but it 
is certain that he claimed divine inspiration for himself and 
his associates. They delivered tl.eir prophecies in an 
ecstasy, and their example seems to have introduced inta 
the church the practice of appealing to visions in favor of 
opinions and actions, of which practice Cyprian and others 
availed themselves to a great extent. Tertullian, who be- 
longed to this sect, informs us that these revelations rela- 
ted only to points of discipline, and neither afiected the 
doctrines of religion nor superseded the authority of Scrips 
ture. The doctrines of iMontanus agreed in general with 
those of the Catholic Churcli. but some of his followers ap- 
pear to have embraced the Sabellian heresy. The lMoi> 
tanists were chiefiy distinguished from other Christians hy 
the austerity of their manners and the strictness of theii 
discipline. They coi.demned secorui marriages, and prac- 
tised fasts- They maintained that all flight from perse- 
cution was unlawful, and that the Cuiu'ch had no power to 
forgi^'e great sins committed after baptism. Thej held the 



MUGGLETONIANS. 



395 



doctrine of the personal reign of Christ on earth at the 
Millennium. They are accused by some of the early writers 
of celebrating mysteries attended by deeds of cruelty and 
lewdness, but it appears quite certain that these charges 
are unfounded. 

The Montanists were warmly opposed by the writers of 
the CathoHc party, though they were once countenanced 
for a short time by a bishop of Kome, whose name is un- 
known, but who is supposed by some to have been Victor. 
Tertullian wrote several works in defence of their opinions'! 

The sect was numerous, and lasted a considerable time. 
They still existed in the time of Augustin . nd Jerome, the 
latter of whom wrote against them. 



MUGGLETONIANS. 

The Muggletonians were a sect of Christians which arose 
in England in the year 1651. The leaders of this sect 
were Lodowicke Muggleton, a journeyman tailor, and John 
Reeve, who asserted that they had been appointed by an 
audible voice from God, as the last and greatest prophets 
of Jesus Christ, that they were the two witnesses mentioned 
in the 11th chapter of the Revelations, and that they had 
power to bless or damn to all eternity whomsoever they 
pleased. They published a great number of works, and 
obtained many followers. The chief writers against them 
were the Quakers, and among these, George Fox and Wm. 
Penn. On the 17th of January, 1676, Muggleton was tried 
at the Old Bailey, and convicted of blasphemy. He died 
on the 14th of March, 1697, at the age of 88. 

It is impossible here to give a full account of the strange 



396 



FLAGELLANTS. 



doctrines of tliis sect. The chief articles of their creed 
appear to have been, that God has the real body of a man, 
that the Trinity is only a variety of names of God, that 
God himself came down to earth, and was born as a man 
and suffered death, and that during this time Elias was 
his representative- in heaven. They held very singular 
and not very intelligible doctrines concerning angels and 
devils. According to them the soul of man is inseparably 
united with the body, with which it dies and will rise 
again. 

A complete collection of the works of Reeve and Mug- 
gleton, together with other Muggletonian tracts, was pub- 
lished by some of their modern followers, in 3 vols. 4to., 
1832. Among the works written against them are the fol- 
lowing: "The New Witnesses proved Old Heretics," by 
William Penn, 4to., 1672 ; "A True Representation of the 
Absurd and Mischievous Principles of the Sect commonly 
known by the name of Muggletonians," 4to., London, 1694. 



FLAGELLANTS, 

^I'PtOM the Jj^Xm flagellar to beat,) the name of a sect ii. 
the 13th century, who thought that they could best expiate 
their sins by the severe discipline of the scourge. Rainer, 
a hermit of Perugia, is said to have been its founder, in 
1260. He soon found followers in nearly all parts of Italy. 
Old and young, great and small, ran through the citiws, 
scourging themselves, and exhorting to repentance. Their 
cumber soon amounted to 10,000, who went about, led by 
priests bearing banners and crosses. They went in thou- 
sands from country to country, begging alms. In 1261, 



FLAGELLANTS. 397 

they broke over the Alps in crowds into Germany, showed 
themselves in Alsatia, Bavaria, Bohemia, and Poland, and 
found there many imitators. In 1296, a small band of Fla- 
gellants appeared in Strasburg, who, with covered faces, 
whipped themselves through the city, and at every churcli. 
The princes and higher clergy were little pleased with thia 
new fraternity, although it was favored by the people. The 
shameful public exposure of the person by the Flagellants 
offended good manners ; their travelling in such numbera 
afforded opportunity for seditious commotions, and irregu- 
larities of all sorts ; and their extortion of alms was a 
severe tax upon the peaceful citizen. On this account, 
both in Germany and in Italy, several princes forbade these 
expeditions of the Flagellants. The kings of Poland and 
Bohemia expelled them with violence from their states, and 
the bishops strenuously opposed them. In spite of this, the 
society continued under another form, in the fraternities 
of the Beghards, in Germany and France, and in the be- 
ginning of the fifteenth century, among the Brothers of the 
Cross, so numerous in Thuringia (so called from wearing 
on their clothes a cross on the breast and on the back), of 
whom 91 were burnt at once at Sangershausen, in 1414. 
The council assembled at Constance, between 1414 and 
1418, was obliged to take decisive measures against them. 
Since this time nothing more has been heard of a fraternity 
of this sort. 

Flagellation has almost always been used for the punish- 
ment of crimes. Its application as a means of religious 
penance is an old Oriental custom, admitted into Christi- 
anity partly because self-torture was considered salutary 
as mortifying the flesh, and partly because both Christ and 
the apostles underwent scourging. From the first century 
of Christianity, religious persons sought to atone for their 
sins, and to move an impartial Judge tc compassion and 

3t 



398 



FLAGELLANTS. 



pardon by voluntary bodily torture. Like the abbot Re- 
gmo, at Prum, in the 10th century, many chose to share 
in the sufferings of Christ, in order to make themselves the 
more certain of forgiveness through him. It became gen* 
eral in the 11th century, when Peter Damiani of Ravejina, 
abbot of the Benedictine monastery of Santa Croce d'Aveh 
lano, near Gubbio, in Italy, afterwards cardinal bishop of 
Ostia, zealously recommended scourging as an atonement 
for sin, to Christians generally, and, in particular, to the 
monks. His own example, and the fame of his sanctity, 
rendered his exhortations effective. Clergy and laity, men 
and women, began to torture themselves with rods and 
thongs and chains. They fixed certain times for the inflic- 
tion of this discipline upon themselves. Princes caused 
themselves to be scourged naked by their father confessors. 
Louis IX. constantly carried with him, for this purpose, an 
ivory box, containing five small iron chains, and exhorted 
his father confessor to scourge him with severity. He like- 
wise gave similar boxes to the princes and princesses of his 
house, and to other pious friends, as marks of his peculiar 
favor. The wild expectation of being purified from sin by 
fiagoUation, prevailed throughout Europe in the last half 
of the 13th century. "About this time," says the monk 
of Padua, in his chronicles of the year 1260, " when all 
Italy was filled with vice, the Perugians suddenly entered 
upon a course never before thought of; after them the 
Komans. and at length all Italy. The fear of Christ exerted 
upon the people so strong an influence, that men of noble 
and ignoble birth, old and young, traversed the streets of 
the city naked, yet without shame. Each carried a scourge 
in his hand, with which he drew forth blood from his tor- 
tured body, amidst sighs and tears, singing, at the same 
time, penitential psalms, and entreating the compassion of 
the Deity. Both by day and night, and even in the coldest 



FLAGELLANTS. 



399 



winters, by hundreds and thousands, they wandered through 
cities and churches, streets and villages, with burning wax 
candles. Music was then silent, and the song of love echoed 
no more; nothing was heard but atoning lamentations. 
The most unfeeling could not refrain from tears ; discord- 
ant parties were reconciled ; usurers and robbers hastened 
to restore their unlawful gains ; criminals, before unsus- 
pected, came and confessed their crimes, &c." But these 
penances soon degenerated into noisy fanaticism and a sort 
of trade. The penitents united into fraternities called the 
Flagellayits (described above), of which there were branches 
in Italy, France, and Germany. After the council of Con- 
stance (1414-18), both clergy and laity by degrees became 
disgusted with flagellation. The Franciscan monks in 
France (Cordeliers) observed the practice longest. It is 
not to be wondered at, that a custom so absurd was so long 
maintained, when we remember the great advantages which 
the sufferers promised themselves. In the opinion of men 
in the middle ages, flagellation was equivalent to every sort 
of expiation for past sins, imposed by the father confessors. 
3000 strokes, and the chanting of 30 penitential psalms, 
were suflScient to cancel the sins of a year ; 30,000 strokes, 
the sins of 10 years, &c. An Italian widow, in the 11th 
century, boasted that she had made expiation by voluntary 
scourging for 100 years, for which no less than 300,000 
stripes were requisite. The opinion was prevalent, like- 
wise, that, however great the guilt, by self-inflicted pain, 
hell might be escaped, and the honor of peculiar holiness 
acquired. By this means, flagellation gained a charm in 
the sight of the guilty and ambitious, which raised them 
above the dread of corporeal suffering, till the conceits of 
hypocrisy vanished before the clearer light of civiHzatioa 
and knowledge. 



400 



ANABAPTISTS. 



ANABAPTISTS. 

Anabaptists are those wlio maintain that baptism ouglu 
always to be performed by immersion. The word is com- 
pounded of ava, "anew," and [BairTKiTrig^ "a Baptist;" sig- 
riifying that those who have been baptized in their infancy 
ought to be baptized anetv. It is a word which has been 
indiscriminately applied to Christians of very different 
principles and practices. The English and Dutch Bap- 
tists do not consider the word as at all applicable to their 
sect ; because those persons whom they baptize they con- 
sider as never having been baptized before, although they 
have undergone what they term the ceremony of sprink- 
ling in their infancy. 

The Anabaptists of Germany, besides their notions con- 
cerning baptism, depended much upon certain ideas which 
they entertained concerning a perfect church establish- 
ment, pure in its members, and free from the institutions 
of human policy. The most prudent part of them consi- 
dered it possible, by human industry and vigilance, to 
purify the church ; and seeing the attempts of Luther to 
be successful, they hoped that the period was arrived in 
which the church was to be restored to this purity. Others, 
not satisfied with Luther's plan of reformation, undertook 
a more perfect plan, or, more properly, a visionary enter- 
prise, to found a new church, entirely spiritual and divine. 

This sect was soon joined by great numbers, whose 
characters and capacities were very different. Their pro- 
gress Yvas rapid ; for, in a very short space of time, their 
discourses, visions, and predictions, excited great commo- 
tions in a great part of Europe. The most pernicious fac* 



ANABAPTISTS. 



401 



• tion of all those which composed this motley multitude, 
was that which pretended that the founders of thib neio 

' and perfect church were under a divine impulse, and were 
armed against all opposition by the power of ^vorking 
miracles. It was this faction that, in the year 1521, be- ' 
gan their fanatical work under the guidance of Munzer, 
Stubner, Storick, etc. These men taught that, among 
Christians, who had the precepts of the gospel to direct, 
and the Spirit of God to guide them, the office of magis- 
tracy was not only unnecessary, but an unlawful encroach- 

•ment on their spiritual liberty ; that the distinctions occa- 
sioned by birth, rank, or wealth should be abolished ; that 
all Christians, throwing their possessions into one stock, 
should live together in that state of equality which be- 
comes members of the same family ; that, as neither the 
laws of nature, nor the precepts of the New Testament, 
had prohibited polygamy, they should use the same liberty 
as the patriarchs did in this respect. 

They employed, at first, the various arts of persuasion 
in order to propagate their doctrines, and related a number 
of visions and revelations with which they pretended to 
have been favored from above ; but when they found that 
this would not avail, and that the ministry of Luther and 
other reformers was detrimental to their cause, they then 
madly attempted to propagate their sentiments by force of 
arms. Munzer and his associates, in the year 1525, put 
themselves at the head of a numerous army, and declared 
war against all laws, governments, and magistrates of 
every kind, under the chimerical pretext that Christ him- 
self was now to take the reins of all government into his 
hands ; but this seditious crowd was routed and dispersed 
by the Eiecter of Saxony and other princes, and Munzer, 
their leader, put to death. 

Many of his followers, however^ survived, and propa- 



402 



ANABAPTISTS. 



gntod their opinions througli Germany, Switzerland, and 
Holland. In 1533, a party of them settled at Munster, 
under two leaders of the names of Matthias and Bock- 
holdt. Having made themselves masters of the city, they 
deposed the magistrates, confiscated the estates of such as 
had escaped, and deposited the wealth in a public treasury 
for common use. They made preparations for the defences 
of the city ; invited the Anabaptists in the Low Countries 
to assemble at Munster, which they called Mount Sion, 
that from thence they might reduce all the nations of the 
earth under their dominion. Matthias was soon cut off by 
the Bishop of Munster's army, and was succeeded by 
Bockholdt, who was proclaimed by a special designation 
of heaven, as the pretended King of Sion, and invested 
with legislative powers like those of Moses. The city of 
Munster, however, was taken after a long siege, and Bock- 
holdt punished with death. 

It must be acknowledged that the true rise of the insur- 
rections of this period ought not to be attributed to reli 
gious opinions. The first insurgents groaned under severe 
oppressions, and took up arms in defence of their civil 
liberties ; and of these commotions the Anabaptists seem 
rather to have availed themselves, than to have been the 
prime movers. That a great part were Anabaptists seems 
indisputable ; at the same time, it appears from history 
that a great part also were Boman Catholics, and a still 
greater part of those who had scarcely any religious prin- 
ciples at all. Indeed, when we read of the vast number? 
that were concerned in these insurrections, of whom it is 
reported that 100,000 fell by the sword, it appears reason- 
able to conclude that they were not all Anabaptists. 

It is but justice to observe, also, that the Baptists of our 
time have nothing in common with this sect. (See article 
Anabaptists, in the appendix to this ^vork, page 564 
and /.) 



4NTIN0MIANS. 



403 



ANTINOMIANS. 

Antinomians are those who maintain that the law is of 
no use or obligation under the gospel dispensation, or who 
hold doctrines that clearly supersede the necessity of good 
works. The Antinomians took their name from John 
Agricola, about the year 1538, who taught that the law is 
no way necessary under the gospel ; that good works do 
not promote our salvation, nor ill ones hinder it ; that re- 
pentance is not to be preached from the decalogue, but 
only from the gospel. 

This sect sprang up in England during the protectorate 
of Cromwell, and extended their system of libertinism 
much farther than Agricola did. Some of them, it is said, 
maintained that if they should commit any kind of sin, it 
would do them no hurt, nor in the least affect their eternal 
state ; and that it is one of the distinguishing characters 
of the elect, that they cannot do anything displeasing to 
God. It is necessary, however, to observe here, and can 
dor obliges us to confess, that there have been others, who 
have been styled Antinomians, who cannot, strictly speak- 
ing, be ranked with these men; nevertheless, the unguarded 
expressions they have advanced, the bold positions they 
have laid down, and the double construction which might 
so easily be put upon many of their sentences, have led 
Bome to charge them with Antinomian principles. 

For instance, when they have asserted justification to be 
eternal, without distinguishing between the secret determi- 
nation of God in eternity and the execution of it in time; 
when they have spoken lightly of good works, or asserted 
that believers have nothing to do with the law of God, 



404 



JUMPERS. 



vritliout fully explaining vrliat tliey mean ; vrhen tliev as- 
Bert that God is not angry witli his people for their sins, 
nor in any sense punishes them for them, mthout distin- 
guishing between fatherly correction and yindictive punish- 
ment ; these things, whatever be the private' sentiments of 
those who advance them, have a tendency to injure the 
minds of many. It has been alleged that the principal 
thing they have had in view was to counteract those legal 
doctrines which have so much aboimded among the self- 
righteous ; but granting this to be true, there is no occa- 
sion to run from one extreme to another. Had many of 
those writers proceeded with more caution, been less dog- 
matical, more explicit in the explanation of theii' senti- 
ments, and possessed more candor towards those who dif- 
fered from them, they would have been more serviceable 
to the cause of truth and relisrion. 



jrMPEES. 

Jumpers, persons so called from the practice of jumping 
during the time allotted for religious worship. This sin- 
gular practice began, it is said, in the western part of 
"Wales, about the year 1760. It was soon after defended 
by Mr. "William Williams, (the Welsh poet, as he is some- 
times called,) in a pamphlet, which was patronized by the 
abettors of jumping in religious assemblies. Several of 
the more zealous itinerant preachers encouraged the people 
to cry out gogoniant (the Welsh word for glory,) amen, &C.5 
<kc. ; to put themselves in violent agitations ; and, finally, 
to jump until they were quite exhausted, so as often to be 
obliged to fall down on the floor or field, where this kind 
of worship was held. 



LA B ADISTS. 



405 



LABADISTS. 

The Labadists were so called from tlieir founder, John 
Labadie, a native of France. He was originally in the 
Romish communion ; but leaving that, he became a mem- 
ber of the reformed church, and performed with reputation 
the ministerial functions in France, Switzerland, and Hol- 
land. He at length erected a new community, which 
resided successively at Middleburg, in Zealand, Amster- 
dam, Hervorden, and at Altona, where he died about 1674 
After his death, his followers removed their wandering 
community to Wiewert, in the district of North Holland, 
where it soon fell into oblivion. If we are to judge of the 
Labadists by their own account, they did not differ from 
the reformed church so much in their tenets and doctrines 
as in their manners and rules of discipline ; yet it seems 
that Labadie had some strano;e notions. Amono: other 
things, he maintained that God might and did, on certain 
occasions, deceive men ; that the faithful ought to have all 
things in common ; that there is no subordination or dis- 
tinction of rank in the true church ; that in reading the 
Scriptures greater attention should be paid to the internal 
inspiration of the Holy Spirit than to the words of the 
text ; that the observation of Sunday was a matter of in- 
difference ; that the contemplative life is a state of grace 
and union with God, and the very height of perfection. 



406 



MYSTICS 



MYSTICS. 

Mystics, a sect distinguished by their professing pure, 
iublime, and perfect devotion, with an entire disinterested 
/ove of God, free from all selfish considerations. The 
authors of this mystic science, which sprung up towards 
the close of the third century, are not known ; but the 
principles from which it was formed are manifest. Its 
first promoters proceeded from the known doctrine of the 
Platonic school, which was also adopted by Origen and 
his disciples, that the divine nature was diffused through 
all human souls ; or that the faculty of reason, from which 
proceed the health and vigor of the mind, was an emana- 
tion from God into the human soul, and comprehended in 
it the principles and elements of all truth, human and 
divine. They denied that men could, by labor or study, 
excite this celestial flame in their breasts ; and therefore 
they disapproved highly of the attempts of those who, by 
definitions, abstract theorems, and profound speculations, 
endeavored to form distinct notions of truth, and to dis- 
cover its hidden nature. 

On the contrary, they maintained that silence, tranquil- 
lity, repose, and solitude, accompanied with such acts as 
might tend to extenuate and exhaust the body, were the 
means by which the hidden and internal word was excited 
to produce its latent virtues, and to instruct men in the 
knowledge of divine things. For thus they reasoned : — 
Those who behold with a noble contempt all human affairs ; 
who turn away their eyes from terrestrial vanities, and 
shut all the avenues of the outward senses against the con- 
tagious influences of a material world, must necessarily 
return to God when the spirit is thus disengaged from the 



MYSTICS. 



407 



;mpe(limeiits that prevented that happy union ; and in this 
blessed frame they not only enjoy inexpressible raptures 
from their communion with the Supreme Being, but are 
also invested with the inestimable privilege of contemplating 
truth undisguised and uncorrupted m its native purity, 
while others behold it in a vitiated and delusive form. 

The number of the Mystics increased in the fourth 
century, under the influence of the Grecian fanatic, who 
gave himself out for Dionysius, the Areopagite disciple of 
St. Paul, and probably lived about this period ; and by 
pretending to higher degrees of perfection than other 
Christians, and practising greater austerity, their cause 
gained ground, especially in the eastern provinces, in the 
fifth century. 

A copy of the pretended works of Dionysius was sent 
by Balbus to Lewis the Meek, in the year 824, which 
kindled the oily flame of mysticism in the western pro- 
vinces, and filled the Latins with the most enthusiastic 
admiration of this new religion. In the twelfth century 
these Mystics took the lead in their method of expounding 
the Scriptures. In the thirteenth century they were the 
most formidable antagonists of the schoolmen ; and, to- 
wards the close of the fourteenth, many of them resided 
and propagated their tenets almost in every part of 
Europe. They had, in the fifteenth century, many per- 
sons of distinguished merit in their number; and in the 
sixteenth century, previous to the Keformation, if any 
sparks of real piety subsisted under the despotic empire 
of superstition, they were only to be found among the 
Mystics. 

The celebrated Madame Bourignon, and tne amiable 
Fenelon, archbishop of Cambray, were of this sect. Dr. 
Haweis, in speaking of the Mystics, Church History, vol. 
iii. p. 47, thus observes: "Among those called Mystics, I 



408 



MYSTICS. 



am persuaded some were found wlio loved God out of a 
pure heart fervently ; and though they were ridiculed and 
reviled for proposing a disinterestedness of love without 
other motives, and as professing to feel in the enjoyment 
of the temper itself an abundant reward, their holy and 
heavenly conversation will carry a stamp of real religion 
upon it." 

As the late Rev. William Law, who was born in 1687, 
makes a distinguished figure among the modern Mystics, 
a brief account of the outlines of his system may, perhaps, 
be entertaining to some readers. He supposed that the 
material world was the very region which originally 
belonged to the fallen angels. At length the light and 
spirit of God entered into the chaos, and turned the 
angels' ruined kingdom into a paradise on earth. God 
then created man, and placed him there. He was made 
in the image of the triune God, a living mirror of the 
divine nature, formed to enjoy communion with Father, 
Son, and Holy Ghost, and live on earth as the angels do 
in heaven. He was endowed with immortality, so that 
the elements of this outward world could not have any 
power of acting on his body ; but by his fall he changed 
the light, life, and spirit of God for the light, life, and 
spirit of the world. He died the very day of his trans- 
gression to all the influences and operations of the Spirit 
of God upon him, as we die to the influences of this world 
when the soul leaves the body; and all the influences and 
operations of the elements of this life were open in him, 
as they were in any animal, at his birth into this world ; 
he became an earthly creature, subject to the dommion of 
this outward world, and stood only in the highest rank of 
animals. But the goodness of God would not leave man 
in this condition ; redemption from it was immediately 
granted, and the bruiser of the serpent brought the light, 



ABYSSIJ^IAN CHURCH. 



409 



life, and spirit of heaven, once more into the human nature 
All men, in consequence of the redemption of Christ, have 
in them the first spark, or seed, of the divine life, as a 
treasure hid in the centre of our souls, to bring forth, by 
degrees, a new birth of that life which was lost in Paradise. 
No son of Adam can be lost, only by turning away from 
the Saviour within him. The only religion which can save 
us, must be that which can raise the light, life, and Spirit 
of God in our souls. Nothing can enter into the vegetable 
kingdom till it have the vegetable life in it, or be a member 
of the animal kingdom till it have the animal life. Thus 
all nature joins with the Gospel in affirming that no man 
can enter into the kingdom of heaven till the heavenly life 
is born in him. Nothing can be our righteousness or 
recovery but the divine nature of Jesus Christ derived to 
our souls. ' 



ABYSSINIAN CHURCH, 

That which is established in the empire of Abyssinia. 
They are a branch of the Copts, with whom they agree 
in admitting only one nature in Jesus Christ, and rejecting 
the Council of Chalcedon ; whence they are also called 
Monophysites and Eutychians. 

The Abyssinian Church is governed by a Bishop, styled 
Ahuna. They have canons also, and monks. The em- 
peror has a kind of supremacy in ecclesiastical matters. 
The Abyssinians have at divers times expressed an incli- 
nation tc be reconciled to the see of Rome ; but rather 
from interested views than from any other motive. They 
practice circumcision on females, as well as males. They 
eat no meats prohibited by the law of Moses. They ob- 

35 



410 



ADAMITES. 



serve both Saturday and Sunday sabbaths. Women are 
obliged to the legal purifications. Brothers marry their 
brother's wives, &c. 

On the other hand they celebrate the Ej iphany with 
peculiar festivity ; have four Lents ; pray for the dead ; 
and invoke angels. Images in painting they venerate, 
but abhor all those in relievo, except the cross. They 
admit the apocryphal books and the canons of the apostles, 
as well as the apostolical constitutions, for genuine. They 
allow of divorce, which is easily granted among them, and 
by the civil judge ; nor do their civil laws prohibit poly- 
gamy. They have, at least, as many miracles and legends 
of saints as the Komish Church. They hold that the soul 
of man is not created ; because, say they, God finished all 
his works on the sixth day. 

Thus we see that the doctrines and ritual of this sect 
form a strange compound of Judaism and Christianity, 
ignorance and superstition. Some, indeed, have been at a 
loss to know whether they are most Christians or Jews ; it 
is to be feared, however, that there is little beside the 
name of Christianity among them. 



ADAMITES, 

A SECT that sprang up in the second century. Epiphanius 
tells us that they were called Adamites from their pretend- 
ing to be re-established in the state of innocence, such as 
Adam was at the moment of his creation, whence they 
ought to imitate him in going naked. They detested mar- 
riage ; maintaining that the conjugal union would never 
have taken place upon earth had sin been unknown. This 
obscure and ridiculous sect did not last long. It was, 



A L B I G E IT S E S . 



411 



however, revived with additional absurdities, in the twelfth 
century. About the beginning of the fifteenth century, 
these errors spread in Germany and Bohemia ; it found 
also some partisans in Poland, Holland, and England. 
I'hey assembled in the night ; and, it is said, one of the 
fundamental maxims of their society was contained in the 
following verse ; 

Jura, perjura, secretum prodere noli. 
Swear, forswear, and reveal not the secret. 



ALBIGENSES. 

Albigenses (Albigeois) ; a name common to several 
Beets, particularly the Cathari and Waldenses, w^ho agreed 
in opposing the dominion of the Roman hierarchy, and 
endeavoring to restore the simplicity of primitive Chris- 
tianity. They had increased very much towards the close 
of the twelfth century, in the south of France, about Tou- 
louse and Albi, and were denominated by the crusaders 
Albigenses from the district Albigeois (territory of Albi), 
where the army of the cross, called together by Pope 
Innocent III., attacked them in 1209. The assassination 
of the papal legate and inquisitor, Peter of Castelnau, 
while occupied in extirpating these heretics in the terri- 
tory of the Count Raymond of Toulouse, occasioned this 
war, which is important as the first which the Romish 
Church waged against heretics within her own dominions. 
It was carried on with a degree of cruelty which cast a 
deep shade over the Roman clergy, as their real object 
appeared to be to deprive the Count of Toulouse of his 
possessions, on account of his tolerating the heretics. It 
was in vain that this powerful prince had sufiered a dis- 



412 



ALBIGENSES. 



graceful penance and flagellation from the legate Mllo, and 
obtained the papal absolution bj great sacrifices. The 
legates, Arnold, Abbot of Citaaux, and Milo, took Beziers, 
the capital of his nephew Roger, by storm, and put all the 
inhabitants (about 60,000), without any distinction of 
creed, to the sword. Simon de Montfort, the military 
leader of the crusade, under the legates, was equally se- 
vere towards other places in the territory of Raymond and 
liis allies, of whom Roger died in a prison, and Peter I., 
king of Arragon, in battle. The lands taken were pre- 
sented by the Church, as a reward for his services, to the 
Count of Montfort, who, however, on account of the 
changing fortune of war, never obtained the quiet posses- 
sion of them ; he was killed by a stone, at the siege of 
Toulouse, in 1218. The legates prevailed on his son 
Amalric to cede his claims to the king of France. The 
papal indulgences attracted from all provinces of France 
new crusaders, who continued the war, and, even after 
the death of Raymond VI., in 1222, under excommunica- 
tion, his son, Raymond VII., was obliged, notwithstanding 
his readiness to do penance, to defend his inheritance till 
1229 against the legates and Louis VIII. of France, who 
fell, in 1226, in a campaign against the heretics. After 
hundreds of thousands had fallen on both sides, and the 
most beautiful parts of Provence and Upper Languedoc had 
been laid waste, a peace was made, by the terms of which 
Raymond was obliged to purchase his absolution with a large 
sum of money, to cede Narbonne, with several estates, to 
Louis IX., and make his son-in-law, a brother of Louis, heir 
of his other lands. The pope suffered these provinces to 
come into the possession of the king of France, in order 
to bind him more firmly to his interests, and force him to 
receive his inquisitors. The heretics were now delivered 
up to the proselyting zeal of the Dominicans^ and to the 



PANTHEISTS. 



413 



courts of the inquisition ; and these new auxiliaries, which 
priestcraft had acquired during the war, employed their 
whole power to bring the remainder of the Albigenses to 
the stake, and made even the converts feel the irrecon- 
cilable anger of the Church, by heavy fines and personal 
punishments. The name of the Albigenses disappeared 
after the middle of the thirteenth century ; but fugitives 
of their party formed, in the mountains of Piedmont and 
in Lombardy, what is called the French Qhurch^ which was 
continued through the Waldenses, to the times of the 
Hussites and the Reformation. 



PANTHEISTS. 

Pantheism, a philosophical species of idolatry, leading 
to atheism, in which the universe was considered as the 
Supreme God. Who was the inventor of this absurd sys- 
tem, is perhaps not known, but it was of early origin, and 
differently modified by different philosophers. Some held 
the universe to be one immense animal, of which the incor 
poreal soul was properly their god, and the heavens and 
the earth the body of that god ; whilst others held but one 
substance, partly active, and partly passive, and therefore 
looked upon the visible universe as the only Numen. The 
earliest Grecian pantheists of whom we read was Orpheus, 
who called the world the body of G-od, and its several parts 
his members, making the whole universe one divine animal. 
According to Cudworth, Orpheus and his followers believed 
m the immaterial soul of the world : therein agreeing with 
Aristotle, who certainly held that God and matter are co- 
eternal : and that there is some such union between them. 



414 



SECOND ADVENTISTS. 



as subsists between the souls and bodies of men. An in 
stiiation, embodying sentiments nearly of this kind, was 
set on foot early in the last century, in En^^land, by 
a society of philosophical idolaters, who called themselves 
Pantheists^ because they professed the worship of All Na- 
ture as their deity. They had Mr. John Toland for their 
secretary and chaplain. Their liturgy was in Latin ; an 
English translation was published in 1751, from which the 
following sentiments are extracted : " The ethereal fire en- 
virons all things, and is therefore supreme. The sether is 
a reviving fire : it rules all things, it disposes till things. 
In ic is soul, mind, prudence. This fire is Hoia.co's par- 
ticle of divine breath, and Virgil's inwardly uourishing 
spirit. All things are comprised in an intelligent nature." 
This force they call the soul of the world ; as also, a mind 
of perfect wisdom, and, consequently, God. Vanini, the 
Italian philosopher, was nearly of this opinion : hiw god wa3 
nature. Some very learned and excellent remarks are made 
on this error by Mr. Boyle, in his discourse on the vulgarly 
received notion of nature. 



SECOND ADYENTISTS. 

Second Adventists: (sometimes called Millerites 
and MiLLENNARiANS;) those who hold, in opposition to 
the general opinion, that the Second Coming of Christ will 
Recede the Millennium, and is necessary to introduce it. 
On the nature of the Millennium, its antecedents, conse- 
quences, and the signs of its approach, they differ widely 
among themselves ; but they all agree that it will be ushered 
u by the Second Advent of the Son of God, and bo dis- 



SECOND ADVENTISTS. 



415 



tinguished as the period of his personal reign on the 
earth. Some go so far as to fix the time ; but others 
content themselves with saying that it is at the door. 

This pre-millennial view of the Second Advent is there- 
fore the characteristic mark of this denomination, 
although they seldom are embodied as a distinct sect, but 
are found in all denominations, more or less. 

They strenuously contend that their view rests upon 
the literal interpretation of the prophecies ; that it was 
the general belief of the earliest Christians, and forms an 
essential and powerful element of practical Christianity. 
They insist that the ordinary view of the Millennium as 
a spiritual reign of righteousness and peace, preceding the 
personal coming of Christ, and followed by a brief but 
terrible Apostacy, which calls down the Son of Grod to 
judgment (Rev. xx.), is of modern date; that it unsettles 
the principles of interpretation, and deadens the spirituai 
life of believers. 

It is but just to say that all these arguments have been 
soberly met and acutely answered by some of the ablest 
writers on Prophecy, particularly by Dr. Brown of Edin- 
burgh. 

In the last century Dr John Gill and Rev. A. M. 
Toplady advocated the doctrine of Christ's personal 
reign, Bishop Newton does not go so far as to give an 
opinion, while President Edwards, Archibald McLean, 
and Andrew Fuller, after long investigation, decided 
in favor of the spiritual reign of Christ in the Millen- 
nium. Mr. Fuller's last thoughts on this subject were 
written within a few months of his death. 

Since that time Rev. Edward Irving, Dr. Cumming, 
George Gilfillan, Mr. Bickersteth, and other clergymen 
of the Church of England, have revived the doctrine of 
the Premillennial Advent abroad. In this country it has 



416 



SECOND ADVENTISTS. 



found many zealous advocates^ among whom may be named 
^Y. Miller, H. L. Hastings and D. T. Taylor. 

In the United States, after the failure of their prediction 
of the Second Coming of Christ in 1843, the Adventists 
retained their organization, though with considerably 
diminished numbers, many of their former adherents 
having returned to the, churches from which they had 
originally come. After the death of Miller, Eev. J. Y. 
Himes became their leader, and avowed very soon doc- 
trines which were at variance with those of the Evangel- 
ical churches generally. These doctrines were mainly 
occupied with three points — the denial of the Trinitarian 
doctrine of the divinity of Christ ; the belief in the uncon- 
scious state of the dead from death to the final resurrec- 
tion; and the final annihilation of the wicked. He also 
adopted the views of the Perfectionists. 

This led to a division among the Adventists, which has 
increased from other causes until the sect, numbering in 
all but about 230 or 240 churches, and not two-thirds that 
number of church edifices, with about 30,000 members, has 
split into 4 distinct organizations, viz. : 

1. Advent Cheistians, who follow Himes in all his 
doctrines except perhaps his Unitarian tendencies, and 
who are probably somewhat the largest of the four organ- 
izations. They have a publication society, with a capital 
of nearly §20,000, and issue many tracts and some books. 
They have also a Christian association and a missionary 
society, and hold an annual camp-meeting. They have 
repeatedly of late years set a day for the Second Coming 
of Christ, but after it passed have discovered that they 
had made some error in their figures. 

2. The Life axd Advent Union, a small body not 
differing materially from the preceding, though more de- 
cided on the annihilation of the wicked. They have a mis- 
sionary society and an annual camp-meeting in August. 

3. The Evangelical Adventists, who are simply 



SOCINIANS. 



417 



Millenarians, and do not differ from many of the best 
members of the Anglican and other churches. They have 
a business association, called the American Millennial 
Association, an annual conference and a national camp- 
meeting. They are much interested in missions. 

4. Seventh-Day Adventists. This is the most ef- 
ficient of the Adventist organizations, differing from the 
preceding mainly in regarding the seventh day as the Sab- 
bath. They have 14 conferences, 51 ordained ministers, 83 
licentiates, 239 churches, 5875 members and about 25,000 
adherent population. They raised, in 1873, $30,687.49 for 
benevolent objects. 



SOCINIANS. 

The Socinians are so called from Faustus Socinus, who 
died in Poland in 1604. There were two who bore the 
name Socinus, uncle and nephew, and both disseminated 
the same doctrine ; but it is the nephew who is generally 
considered as the founder of this sect. They maintain 
" that Jesus Christ was a mere man, who had no existence 
before he was conceived by the Virgin Mary; that the 
Holy Ghost is no distinct person ; but that the Father ia 
truly and properly God. They own that the name of God 
is given in the Holy Scriptures to Jesus Christ, but con- 
tend that it is only a deputed title, which, however, invests 
him with a great authority over all created beings. They 
deny the doctrines of satisfaction and imputed righteous- 
ness, and say that Christ only preached the truth to man- 
kind, set before them in himself an example of heroic 
virtue, and sealed bis doctrines with his blood. Original 
Bin and absolute predestination they esteem scholastic chi- 
meras. Some of them likewise maintain the sleep of the 

2 B 



418 



so CINlANS. 



soul, which, they say, becomes insensible at death, and is 
raised again with the body at the resurrection, when the 
good shall be established in the possession of eternal feli- 
city, while the wicked shall be consigned to a fire that will 
not torment them eternally, but for a certain duration pro- 
portioned to their demerits." 

There is some difference, however, between ancient and 
modern Socinians. The latter, indignant at the name 
Socinian, have appropriated to themselves that of Unita- 
rians, and reject the notions of a miraculous conception 
and the worship of Christ ; both which were held by Soci- 
nus. Dr. Priestley has labored hard in attempting to de- 
fend this doctrine of the Unitarians ; but Dr. Horsley, 
Bishop of Rochester, has ably refuted the doctor in his 
Theological Tracts, which are worthy the perusal of every 
Christian, and especially every candidate for the ministry. 

Dr. Price agreed with the Socinians in the main, yet his 
system was somewhat different. He believed in the pre- 
existence of Christ, and likewise that he was more than a 
human being ; and took upon him human nature for a 
higher purpose than merely revealing to mankind the will 
of God, and instructing them in their duty and in the doc- 
trines of religion. 

The Socinians flourished greatly in Poland about the 
year 1551 ; and J. Siemienius, palatine of Podolia, built 
purposely for their use the city of Racow. A famous 
catechism was published, called the Racovian Catechism ; 
and their most able writers are known by the title of the 
Polones Fratres, or Polonian Brethren. Their writings 
were republished together, in the year 1656, in one great 
collection, consisting of six volumes in folio, under the title 
of Eibliotheca Fratrum. 



S ANDEMANI AN8. 



419 



SANDEMANIANS. 

Tee Sandemanians are a sect that originated in Scot- 
land about the year 1728, where it is, at this time, distin- 
gm^hed by the name of Glassites, after its founder, Mr. 
Joha Glass, who vms a minister of the established church 
in that kingdom ; but, being charged with a design of sub- 
verwing the national covenant, and sapping the foundation 
of ill national establishments, by maintaining that the 
Mr jdom of Ohrist is not of this world, was expelled from 
the synod by the Church of Scotland. His sentiments 
are Tully explained in a tract, published at that time, enti- 
tled The Testimony of the King of Martyrs," and pre- 
Ber\ dd in the first volume of his works. In consequence 
of Mr. Glass' expulsion, his adherents formed themselves 
into churches, conformable, in their institution and disci- 
plin i, to what they apprehended to be the plan of the first 
chui ehes recorded in the New Testament. Soon after the 
yeai 1755, Mr. Robert Sandeman, an elder in one of these 
chur ;hes in Scotland, published a series of letters addressed 
to Mr. Hervey, occasioned by his Theron and Aspasia, in 
which he endeavors to show that his notion of faith is con- 
tradictory to the Scripture account of it, and could only 
serve to lead men, professedly holding the doctrines called 
Calvinistic, to establish their own righteousness upon their 
frames, feelings, and acts of faith. In these letters Mr. 
Sandeman attempts to prove that justifying faith is no 
more than a simple belief of the truth, or the divine testi- 
mony passively received by the understanding; and that 
thiB divine testimony carries in itself sufficient ground of 
hopQ to every one who believes it, without anything 



420 



S ANDEM ANIANS. 



wrought in us, or done bj us, to give it a particular direo 
tion to ourselves. 

Some of the popular preachers, as they were called, had 
taught that it was of the essence of faith to believe that 
Christ is ours ; but Mr. Sandeman contended that thai 
which is believed in true faith is the truths and what would 
nave been the truth, though we had never believed it. 
They dealt largely in calls and invitations to repent and 
believe in Christ in order to forgiveness; but he rejects 
the whole of them, maintaining that the gospel contained 
no offer but that of evidence, and that it was merely a 
record or testimony to be credited. They had taught that 
though acceptance with God, which included the forgive- 
ness of sins, was merely on account of the imputed right- 
eousness of Christ, yet that no one was accepted of God, 
nor forgiven, till he repented of his sin, and received 
Christ as the only Saviour ; but he insists that there is 
acceptance with God through Christ for sinners, while 
such, or before " any act, exercise, or exertion of their 
minds whatsoever ;" consequently before repentance ; and 
that " a passive belief of this quiets the guilty conscience, 
begets hope, and so lays the foundation for love." It ia 
by this passive belief of the truth that we, according to 
Mr. Sandeman, are justified, and that boasting is excluded. 
Tf any act, exercise, or exertion of the mind were neces- 
sary to our being accepted of God, he conceives there 
would be whereof to glory ; and justification by faith could 
not be opposed, as it is in Rom. iv. 4, 6, to justification by 
works. 

The authors to whom Mr. Sandeman refers, under the 
title of "popular preachers," are Flavel, Boston, Guthrie, 
the Erskines, etc., whom he has treated with acrimony and 
contempt. "I would be far," says he, "from refusing 
even to the popular preachers themselves what they so 



SANDEMANIANS. 



421 



much grudge to others — the benefit of the one instance of 
a hardened sinner finding mercy at last ; for I know of no 
sinners more hardened, none greater destroyers of man- 
kind, than ihey." There have not been wanting writers, 
however, who have vindicated these ministers from his in 
rectives and have endeavored to show that Mr. Sandeman's 
notion of faith, by excluding all exercise or concurrence 
of the will with the gospel way of salvation, confounds 
the faith of devils with that of Christians, and so is calcu- 
lated to deceive the souls of men. It has also been ob- 
served, that though Mr. Sandeman admits of the acts of 
faith and love as fruits of believing the truth, yet, ^' all hia 
godliness consisting (as he acknowledges to Mr. Pike) in 
love to that which first relieved him,'' it amounts to nothing 
but self-love. And as self-love is a stranger to all those 
strong affections expressed in the 109th Psalm towards the 
law of God, he cannot admit of them as the language of a 
good man, but applies the whole psalm to Christ, though 
the person speaking acknowledges that " before he was 
afflicted, he went astray." Others have thought that from 
the same principle it were easy to account for the bitter- 
ness, pride, and contempt which distinguish the system ; 
for self-love, say they, is consistent with the greatest aver- 
sion to all beings divine or human, excepting so far as they 
become subservient to us. 

The chief opinion and practices in which this sect differs 
from other Christians, are their weekly administration of 
the Lord's Supper ; their love feasts, of which every mem- 
ber is not only allowed but required to partake, and which 
consist of their dining together at each other's houses in 
the interval between the morning and afternoon service. 
Their kiss of charity used on this occasion at the admis 
sion of a new member, and at other times when they deem 
it necessary and proper; their weekly collection before 

36 



422 



S A N D E M A N I A N S . 



ihe Lord's Supper, for the support of the poor, and de- 
fraying other expenses ; mutual exhortation ; ahstinence 
from blood and thinirs stranorled ; washing each other's 
feet, when, as a deed of mercy, it might be an expression 
of love, the precept concerning- which, as well as other 
precepts, they understand literally ; community of goods, 
so far as that every one is to consider all that he has in 
his possession and power liable to the calls of the poor and 
the church ; and the unlawfulness of laying up treasures 
upon earth, by setting them apart for any distant, future, 
and uncertain use. They allow of public and private di- 
versions, so far as they are unconnected with circumstances 
really sinful ; but apprehending a lot to be sacred, disap- 
prove of lotteries, playing at cards, dice, etc. 

They maintain a plurality of elders, pastors or bishops, 
In each church ; and the necessity of the presence of two 
elders in every act of discipline, and at the administration 
of the Lord's Supper. 

In the choice of these elders, want of learning, and 
engagement in trade, are no sufficient objection, if quali- 
fied according to the instructions given to Timothy and 
Titus ; but second marriages disqualify for the office ; and 
they are ordained by prayer and fasting, imposition of 
hands, and giving the right hand of fellowship. 

In their discipline they are strict and severe, and think 
themselves obliged to separate from the communion and 
worship of all such religious societies as appear to them 
not to profess the simple truth for their only ground of 
hope, and who do not walk in obedience to it. We shall 
only add, that in every transaction they esteem unanimity 
to be absolutely necessary. 

In the year 1T64, Mr. Sandeman, having accepted an 
invitation from some persons in America, who had read 
his writings and professed a strong attachment to them, to 



NECESSARIANS. 



423 



i^i5tru and settle among them, sailed for New England 
Thei-t? is reason to believe that he was much disappointed 
in the persons who had invited him over, and in the expec- 
tations he had formed generally respecting America. 
Diissensions began to arise, soon after his arrival, between 
the colonies and mother CDimtry. Mr. Sandeman's priu- 
?iples led him to ?.vow the most implicit allegiance to the 
latter, which rendered him obnoxious to the colonists ; his 
days were imbittered ; his prospects of usefulness in a 
great measure blighted ; and, after collecting a few small 
societies, he ended his life at Danbury, in Connecticut, 
Fairfield County, in the year 1771. Since his death, 
there has appeared from his pen, " The Honor of Mar- 
riage opposed to all Impurities;" "An Essay on Solomon's 
Song;" "On the Sign of the Prophet Jonah," etc., etc., 
all of which may be read with profit. 



NECESSARIANS. 

Necessarians, an appellation which may be given to 
all who maintain that moral agents act from necessity. 

Necessity signifies whatever is done by a cause or 
power that is irresistible, in which sense it is opposed to 
freedom. Man is a necessary agent, if all his actions be 
so determined by the causes preceding each action, that 
not one past action could possibly not have come to pass, 
or have been otherwise than it hath been, nor one future 
action can possibly not come to pass, or be otherwise than 
it shall be. On the other hand, it is asserted that he is a 
free agent, if he be able, at any time, under the causes 
and circumstances he then is, to do dijGferent things ; or. 



424 



NECESSARIANS. 



in. otlier words, if lie be not unavoidably determined m 
every point of time by tbe circumstances he is in, and tins 
causes he is under, to do any one thing he does, and not 
possibly to do any other thing. "Whether man is a neces- 
sary or a free agent, is a question which has been debated 
by writers of the first eminence. Hobbes, Collins, Hume, 
Leibnitz, Kaims, Hartley, Priestley, Edwards, Crombie, 
Toplady, and Belsham, have written on the side of neces- 
sity ; while Clarke, King, Law, Reid, Butler, Price, 
Bryant, Wollaston, Horsley, Beattie, Gregory, and But- 
terworth, have written against it. To state all their argu- 
ments in this place, would take up too much room ; suffice 
it to say, that the Anti-necessarians suppose that the doc- 
trine of necessity charges God as the author of sin ; that 
it takes away the freedom of the will, renders man unac- 
countable, makes sin to be no evil, and morality or virtue 
to be no good ; precludes the use of means, and is of the 
most gloomy tendency. The Necessarians deny these 
to be legitimate consequences, and observe that the Deity 
acts no more immorally in decreeing vicious actions, than 
in permitting all those irregularities, which he could so 
easily have prevented. The difficulty is the same on each 
hypothesis. All necessity, say they, doth not take away 
freedom. The actions of a man may be at one and the , 
same time free and necessary too. It was infallibly cer- 
tain that Judas would betray Christ, yet he did it volun- 
tarily. Jesus Christ necessarily became a man, and died, 
yet he acted freely. A good man doth naturally and 
necessarily love his children, yet voluntarily. It is part 
of the happiness of the blessed to love God unchangeably, 
yet freely, for it would not be their happiness if done by 
compulsion. Ndi does it, says the Necessarian, render 
man unaccountable, since the Divine Being does no injury 
to his rational faculties; and man, as his creature, ia 



NECESSARIANS. 



425 



answerable to him ; besides, be bas a rigbt to do wbat be 
will witb bis own. That necessity doth not render actions 
less morally good, is evident ; for if necessary virtue be 
neither moral nor praiseworthy, it will follow that God 
himself is not a moral being, because he is a necessary 
one ; and the obedience of Christ cannot be good, because 
it was necessary. Further, say they, necessity does no' 
preclude the use of means ; for means are no less appointed 
tban the end. It was ordained that Christ should be 
delivered up to death ; but he could not have been betrayed 
without a betrayer, nor crucified without crucifiers. That 
it is not a gloomy doctrine, they allege, because nothing 
can be more consolatory than to believe that all things are 
under the direction of an all-wise Being ; that his kingdom 
ruleth over all, and that he doth all things well. So fai 
from its being inimical to happiness, they suppose there 
can be no solid true happiness without the belief of it; 
that it inspires gratitude, excites confidence, teaches 
resignation, produces humility, and draws the soul to God. 
It is also observed, that to deny necessity is to deny the 
foreknowledge of God, and to wrest the sceptre from the 
hand of the Creator, and to place that capricious and 
undefinable principle — the self-determining power of man 
— upon the throne of the universe. Besides, say they, the 
Scripture places the doctrine beyond all doubt, Job xxiii. 
13, 14, ; xxxiv. 29 ; Prov. xvi. 4 ; Is. xlv. 7 ; Acts xiii. 48; 
Eph. i. 11 ; 1 Thess. iii. 3 ; Matt. x. 29, 30, xviii. 7 ; Luke 
xxiv. 26 ; John vi. 37. 

36* 



426 



LOLLARDS. 



LOLLAEDS. 

The Lollards were a religions sect, differing in manj 
points from the Churcli of Eome. whicli arose in Germany 
about tte beginning of tbe fourteentb century ; so called, 
as many writers have imagined, from TValtej Lollard, who 
began to dogmatize in 1315, and was bnmtd at Cologne ; 
though others think that Lollard was no surname, but 
merely a term of reproach applied to all heretics who con- 
cealed the poison of error under the appearance of piety. 

The monk of Canterbury derives the origin of the word 
lollard among us from lolium, " a tare," as if the Lollards 
were the tares sown in Christ's vineyard. Abelly says, 
that the word signifies " praising God," from the German 
lohen, "to praise," and herr, **lord:" because the Lollards 
employed themselves in travelling about from place to 
place, singing psalms and hymns. Others, much to the 
same purpose, derive lolUiard. lulhard. or loUert, luUert, as 
it was written by the ancient Germans, from the old 
German word, luUen, loilen, or lallen. and the termination 
hard, with which many of the High Dutch words end. 
Lotlen signifies, "to sing with a low voice," and therefore 
lollard is a singer, or one who frequently sings ; and in 
the vulgar tongue of the Germans it denotes a person who 
is continually praising God with a song, or singing hymns 
to his honor. 

The Alexians or Cellites were called Lollards, because 
they were public singers, who made it their business to 
inter the bodies of those who died of the plague, and sang 
a dircre over them in a moumfid and indistinct tone, as 
thev carried them to the grave. The name was after- 



LOLLARDS. 



427 



wards assumed by persons that dishonored it ; for we find 
among those Lollards who made extraordinary pretences 
to religion, and spent the greatest part of their time in 
meditation, prayer, and such acts of piety, there were 
many abominable hypocrites, who entertained the most 
ridiculous opinions, and concealed the most enormous vices 
under the specious mask of this extraordinary profession 
Many injurious aspersions were therefore propagatec* 
tigainst those who assumed this name by the priests and 
monks ; so that, by degrees, any person who covered 
heresies or crimes under the appearance of piety was called 
a Lollard, Thus the name was not used to denote, any 
one particular sect, but was formerly common to all persons 
or sects who were supposed to be guilty of impiety towards 
God or the church, under an external profession of great 
piety. However, many societies, consisting both of men 
and women, under the name of Lollards, were formed in 
most parts of Germany and Flanders, and were supported 
partly by their manual labors, and partly by the charitable 
donations of pious persons. The magistrates and inhabi- 
tants of the towns where these brethren and sisters resided, 
gave them particular marks of favor and protection, on 
account of their great usefulness to the sick and needy. 
They were thus supported against their malignant rivals, 
and obtained many papal constitutions, by which their 
institute was confirmed, their persons exempted from the 
cognizance of the inquisitor, and subjected entirely to the 
jurisdiction of the bishops ; but as these measures were 
insufficient to secure them from molestation, Charles, duke 
of Burgundy, in the year 1472, obtained a solemn bull 
from pope Sextus IV., ordering that the Cellites or Lol- 
lards should be ranked among the religious orders, and 
delivered from the jurisdiction of the bishops. And pope 
Julius IL' granted them still greater privileges, in the year 



428 



JESUITS . 



1506. Mosheim informs us, that many societies of this 
kind are still subsisting at Cologne, and in the cities of 
Flanders, though they have evidently departed from their 
ancient rules. 

Lollard and his followers rejected the sacrifice of the 
mass, extreme unction, and penances for sin ; arguing that 
Christ's sufferings were sufficient. He is likewise said to 
have set aside baptism, as a thing of no effect ; and re- 
pentance as not absolutely necessary, &c. In England, 
the followers of Wickliffe were called, by way of reproach, 
Lollards^ from the supposition that there was some affinity 
between some of their tenets ; though others are of opinion 
that the English Lollards came from Germany. 



JESUITS. 

Jesuits, or the Society of Jesus, a famous religious 
order of the Roman Church, founded by Ignatius Loyola, 
a Spanish knight, in the sixteenth century. The plan 
which this fanatic formed of its constitution and laws, was 
suggested, as he gave out, by the immediate inspiration 
of Heaven. But, notwithstanding this high pretension, hia 
design met at first with violent opposition. The Pope, to 
whom Loyola had applied for the sanction of his authority 
to confirm the institution, referred his petition to a com- 
mittee of cardinals. They represented the establishment 
to be unnecessary as well as dangerous, and Paul refused 
to grant his approbation of it. At last, Loyola removed 
all his scruples, by an offer which it was impossible for any 
Pope to resist. He proposed that, besides the three vows 



JESUITS. 



429 



of poverty, of chastity, and of monastic obedience, whicli 
are common to all the orders of regulars, the members of 
his society should take a fourth vow of obedience to the 
Pope, binding themselves to go whithersoever he should 
command for the service of religion, and without requiring 
anything from the Holy See for their support. At a time 
when the Papal authority had received such a shock by 
the revolt of so many nations from the Romish Church, at 
a time when every part of the popish system was attacked 
with so much violence and success, the acquisition of a 
body of men, thus peculiarly devoted to the see of Rome, 
and whom it might set in opposition to all its enemies, was 
an object of the highest consequence. Paul, instantly per 
ceiving this, confirmed the institution of the Jesuits by his 
bull, granted the most ample privileges to the members 
of the society, and appointed Loyola to be the first general 
of the order. 1640 The event justified Paul's discernment 
in expecting such beneficial consequences to the see of 
Rome from this institution. In less than half a century, 
the society obtained establishments in every country that 
adhered to the Roman Catholic Church; its power and 
wealth increased amazingly ; the number of its members 
became great ; their character as well as accomplishments 
were still greater ; and the Jesuits were celebrated by the 
friends and dreaded by the enemies of the Romish faith, 
as the most able and enterprising order in the church. 

2. Jesuits, object of the Order of. — The primary object 
of almost all the monastic orders is to separate men from the 
world, and from any concern in its affairs. In the solitude 
and silence of the cloister, the monk is called to work out his 
salvation by extraordinary acts of mortification and piety. 
He is dead to the world, and ought not to mingle in its 
transactions. He can be of no benefit to mankind but by 
his example and by his prayers. On the contrary, the 



430 



JESUITS. 



Jesuits are taught to consider themselves as formed foi 
action. They are chosen soldiers, bound to exert them- 
selves continually in the service of God, and of the Pope, 
h's vicar on earth. Whatever tends to instruct the igno- 
rant, whatever can be of use to reclaim or oppose the ene- 
mies of the Holy See, is their proper object. That they 
may have full leisure for this active service, they are totally 
exempted from those functions, the performance of which 
is the chief business of other monks. They appear in no 
processions ; they practise no rigorous austerities ; they do 
not consume one-half of their time in the repetition of 
tedious offices ; but they are required to attend to all the 
transactions of the world, on account of the influence which 
these may have upon religion : they are directed to study 
the disposition of persons in high rank, and to cultivate 
their friendship ; and by the very constitucion and genius 
of the order, a spirit of action and intrigue is infused into 
all its members. 

3. Jesuits, peculiarities of their policy and government, 
■ — Other orders are to be considered as voluntary associa- 
tions, in which, whatever aflects the whole body, is regu- 
lated by the common suffrage of all its members. But 
Loyola, full of the ideas of implicit obedience, which he 
had derived from his military profession, appointed that 
the government of his order should be purely monarchical. 
A general chosen for life, by deputies from the several 
provinces, possessed power that was supreme and inde- 
pendent, extending to every person and to every case. To 
h:^ commands they were required to yield not only outward 
obedience, but to resign up to him the inclinations of their 
own wills, and the sentiments of their own understandings. 
Such a singular form of policy could not fail to impress its 
character on all the members of the order, and to give a 
ttculiar force to all its operations. There has not been, 



JESUITS. 



431 



perhaps, m the annals of mankind, any example of such a 
perfect despotism exercised, not over monks shut up in the 
cells of a convent, but over men dispersed among all the 
nations of the earth. As the constitutions of the order 
vest in the general such absolute dominion over all its 
members, they carefully provide for his being perfectly in- 
formed with respect to the character and abilities of hia 
subjects. Every novice who offers himself for a candidate 
for entering into the order, is obliged to manifest his con- 
science to the superior, or a person appointed by him ; and 
is required to confess not only his sins and defects, but to 
discover the inclinations, the passions, and the bent of the 
Boul. This manifestation must be renewed every six months. 
Each member is directed to observe the words and actions 
of the novices, and they are bound to disclose everything of 
importance concerning them to the superior. In order that 
the scrutiny into their character may be as complete as 
possible, a long noviciate must expire, during which they 
pass through the several gradations of rank in the society; 
and they must have attained the full age of thirty-three 
years before they can be admitted to take the final vows 
by which they become professed members. By these various 
methods, the superiors, under whose immediate inspection 
the novices are placed, acquire a thorough knowledge of 
their disposition and talents ; and the general, by examin- 
ing the registers kept for this purpose, is enabled to choose 
the instruments which his absolute power can employ in 
any service for which he thirks meet to destine them. 

4. Jesuits, progress of the power and influence of. — As 
it was the professed intention of this order to labor with 
unwearied zeal in promoting the salvation of men, this en- 
gaged them, of course, in many active functions. Erom 
their first institution, they considered the education of youth 
as their peculiar province : they aimed at being spiritual 



432 



JESUITS. 



guides and confessors ; thej preacbed frequently, in order 
to instruct the people ; tliey set out as missionaries to con- 
vert unbelieving nations. Before the expiration of the six- 
teenth century, they had obtained the chief direction of the 
education of youth in every Catholic country in Europe. 
They had become the confessors of almost all its monarchs ; 
a function of no small importance in any reign, but, under 
a Tveak prince, superior to that of minister. They were 
the spiritual guides of almost every person eminent for 
rank or power ; they possessed the highest degree of confi- 
dence and interest with the papal court, as the most zealous 
and able champions for its authority ; they possessed, at 
diflerent periods, the direction of the most considerable 
courts in Europe ; they mingled in all affairs, and took part 
in every intrigue and revolution. But while they thus 
advanced in power, they increased also in wealth : various 
expedients were devised for eluding the obligation of the vow 
of poverty. Besides the sources of wealth commoL. to all 
the regular clergy, the Jesuits possessed one which was 
peculiar to themselves. Under the pretext of promoting 
the success of their missions, and of facilitating the sup- 
port of their missionaries, they obtained a special License 
from the court of Rome, to trade with the nations which 
they labored to convert ; in consequence of this, they en- 
gaged in an extensive and lucrative commerce, both in the 
East and West Indies ; they opened warehouses in different 
parts of Europe, in which they vended theii' commodities. 
Not satisfied with trade alone, they imitated the example 
of other commercial societies, and aimed at obtaining set- 
dements. They acquired possession, accordingly, of the 
large and fertile province of Paraguay, which stretches 
across the southern continent of America, from the bottom 
of the mountains of Potosi to the confines of the Spanish 
and Portuguese settlements on the banks of the river Dela 



JESUITS. 



433 



Plata. Here, indeed, it must be confessed, thej were of 
service : they found the inhabitants in a state little differ- 
ent from that which takes place among men when they first 
begin to unite together ; strangers to the arts ; subsisting 
precariously by hunting or fishing ; and hardly acquainted 
with the first principles of subordination and government. 
The Jesuits set themselves to instruct and civilize these 
savages : they taught them to cultivate the ground, build 
houses, and brought them to live together in villages, &c. 
They made them taste the sweets of society, and trained 
them to arts and manufactures. Such was their power 
over them, that a few Jesuits presided over some hundred 
thousand Indians. But even in this meritorious effort of 
the Jesuits for the good of mankind, the genius and spirit 
of their order was discernible : they plainly aimed at esta- 
blishing in Paraguay an independent empire, subject to the 
society alone, and which, by the superior excellence of itH 
constitution and police, could scarcely have failed to extend 
its dominion over all the southern continent of America. 
With this view, in order to prevent the Spaniards and Por- 
tuguese in the adjacent settlements from acquiring any 
dangerous influence over the people within the limits of the 
province subject to the society, the Jesuits endeavored to 
inspire the Indians with hatred and contempt of the3e na- 
tions ; they cut off all intercourse between their subjects 
and the Spanish or Portuguese settlements. When they 
were obliged to admit any person in a public character 
from the neighboring governments, they did not permit him 
to have any conversation with their subjects ; and no Indian 
WiiS allowed even to enter the house where these strangers 
resided, unless in the presence of a Jesuit. In order te 
render any communication between them as difiicult as pos- 
sible, they industriously avoided giving the Indians any 
knowledge of the Spanish or any other European language; 
a7 2 c 



434 



JESUITS 



but encouraged the different tribes whicli they had civilized 
to acquire a certain dialect of the Indian tongue, and 
labored to make that the universal language throughout 
their dominions. As all these precautions, without military 
force, would have been insufficient to have rendered their 
empire secure and permanent, they instructed their subjects 
in the European art of war, and formed them into bodies 
completely armed, and well disciplined. 

5. Jesuits^ pernicious effects of this order on civil so- 
ciety, — Though it must be confessed that the Jesuits culti- 
vated the study of ancient literature, and contributed much 
towards the progress of polite learning ; though they have 
produced eminent masters in every branch of science, and 
can boast of a number of ingenious authors ; yet, unhap- 
pily for mankind, their vast influence has been often ex- 
erted with the most fatal effects. Such was the tendency 
of that discipline observed by the society in forming its 
members, and such the fundamental maxims in its consti- 
tution, that every Jesuit was taught to regard the interest 
of the order as the capital object to which every considera- 
tion was to be sacrificed. As the prosperity of the order 
was intimately connected with the preservation of the papal 
authority, the Jesuits, influenced by the same principle of 
attachment to the interest of their society, have been the 
most zealous patrons of those doctrines which tend to 
exalt ecclesiastical power on the ruins of civil government. 
They have attributed to the court of Rome a jurisdiction 
as extensive and absolute as was claimed by the most pre- 
sumptuous pontiffs in the dark ages. They have contended 
for the entire independence of ecclesiastics on the civil 
magistrates. They have published such tenets concerning 
the duty of opposing princes who were enemies of the 
Catholic faith, as countenanced the most atrocious crimes, 
and tended to dissrlve all the ties which connect subjects 



JESUITS. 



435 



with their rulers. As the order derived both reputation 
and authority from the zeal with which it stood forth iia 
defence of the Romish Church against the attacks of the 
reformers, its members, proud of this distinction, have 
considered it as their peculiar function to combat the 
opinions, and to check the progress of. the Protestants. 
They have made use of every art, and have employed 
every weapon against them. They have set themselves 
in opposition to every gentle or tolerating measure in their 
favor. They have incessar cly stirred up against them all 
the rage of ecclesiastical and civil persecution. Whoever 
recollects the events which have happened in Europe 
during two centuries, will find that the Jesuits may justly 
be considered as responsible for most of the pernicious 
effects arising from that corrupt and dangerous casuistry, 
from those extravagant tenets concerning ecclesiastical 
power, and from that intolerant spirit which have been the 
disgrace of the Church of Rome throughout that period, 
and which have brought so many calamities upon society. 

6. Jesuits^ downfall in Europe. — Such were the laws, 
the policy, and the genius of this formidable order; of 
which, however, a perfect knowledge has only been attain- 
able of late. Europe had observed for two centuries the 
ambition and power of the order ; but while it felt many 
fatal effects of these, it could not fully discern the causes 
to which they were to be imputed. It was unacquainted 
with many of the singular regulations in the political con- 
stitution or government of the Jesuits, which formed the 
enterprising spirit of intrigue that distinguished its mem- 
bers, and elevated the body itself to such a height of 
power. It was a fundamental maxim with the Jesuits, 
from their first institution, not to publish the rules of their 
order : these they kept concealed as an impenetrable mys- 
Iscry. They never communicated them to strangers, nor 



436 



JESUITS. 



even to the greater part of tlieir own members ; they re- 
fused to produce them when required by courts of justice ; 
and, by a strange solecism in policy, the civil power in 
different countries authorized or connived at the establish- 
ment of an order of men, whose constitution and laws were 
concealed with a*solicitude which alone was a good reason 
for having excluded them. During the prosecutions which 
have been carried on against them in Portugal and France, 
the Jesuits have been so inconsiderate as to produce the 
mysterious volumes of their institute. By the aid of these 
authentic records, the principles of their government may 
be delineated, and the sources of their power investigated, 
with a degree of certainty and precision which, previous 
to that event, it was impossible to attain. 

The pernicious effects of the spirit and constitution of 
this order rendered it early obnoxious to some of the 
principal powers in Europe, and gradually brought on its 
downfall. There is a remarkable passage in a sermon 
preached at Dublin by Archbishop Brown, so long ago as 
the year 1551, and which may be considered as almost 
prophetic. It is as follows: "But there are a new frater- 
nity of late sprung up, who call themselves Jesuits, which 
will deceive many, much after the Scribes and Pharisees' 
manner.. Amongst the Jews they shall strive to abolish 
the truth, and shall come very near to do it. Eor these 
sorts will turn themselves into several forms ; with the 
heathen, a heathenist ; with the atheist, an atheist ; with 
the Jews, a Jew ; with the reformers, a reformade ; pur- 
posely to know your intentions, your minds, your hearts, 
and your inclinations, and thereby bring you at last to be 
like the fool that said in his heart, there was no God. 
These shall be spread over the whole world, shall be ad- 
mitted into the councils of princes, and they never the 
wiser ; charming of them, yea, making your princes reveal 



HOPKINSIANS. 



437 



their hearts, and the secrets therein, and yet they not 
perceive it ; which will happen from falling from the law 
of God, by neglect of fulfilling the law of God, and by 
winking at their sins ; yet, in the end, God, to justify his 
law, shall suddenly cut off this society, even by the hand 
of those who have most succored them, and made use of 
them ; so that at the end they shall become odious to all 
nations. They shall be worse than Jews, having no resting 
place upon earth ; and then shall a Jew have more favor 
than a Jesuit." This singular passage seems to be accom- 
plished. The Emperor Charles Y. saw it expedient to 
check their progress in his dominions ; they were expelled 
England by proclamation, 2 James I., in 1604 ; Venice in 
1606; Portugal in 1759; France in 1764: Spain and 
Sicily in 1767 ; and totally suppressed and abolished by 
Pope Clement XIV., in 1773. 

In 1801 the society was restored in Russia by the 
Emperor Paul ; and in 1804, by King Ferdinand, in Sar- 
dinia. In August, 1814, a bull was issued by Pope Pius 
VII., restoring the order to all their former privileges, and 
calling upon all Catholic princes to afford them protection 
and encouragement. They have recently been banished 
from Germany. 



HOPKINSIANS. 

The Hopkinsians were so called from the Rev. Samuel 
Hopkins, D. D., an American divine, who in his sermons 
and tracts has made several additions to the sentiments 
first advanced by the celebrated Jonathan Edwards, late 
president of New Jersey College. 

The following is a summary of the distinguished tenets 

37* 



438 



HOPKINSIANS. 



of the Hopkinsians, together with a few of the reasons they 
bring forward in support of their sentiments. 

1. That all true virtue, or real holiness, consists in dis- 
interested benevolence. The object of benevolence is uni- 
versal being, including God and all intelligent creatures. 
It wishes and seeks the good of every individual, so far as 
is consistent with the greatest good of the whole, which is 
comprised in the glory of God and the perfection and hap- 
piness of his kingdom. The law of God is the standard 
of all moral rectitude or holiness. This is reduced into 
love to God, and our neighbor as ourselves, and universal 
good-will comprehends all the love to God, our neighbor 
and ourselves, required in the divine law, and therefore 
must be the whole of holy obedience. Let any serious 
person think what are the particular branches of true piety; 
when he has viewed each one by itself, he will find that 
disinterested friendly afi*ection is its distinguishing charac- 
teristic. For instance, all the holiness in pious fear, which 
distinguishes it from the fear of the wicked, consists in love. 
Again — holy gratitude is nothing but good-will to God and 
our neighbor, in which we ourselves are included ; and cor- 
respondent affection, excited by a view of the good-will and 
kindness of God. Universal good-will also implies the 
whole of the duty we owe to our neighbor, for justice, truth, 
and faithfulness, are comprised in universal benevolence ; 
so are temperance and chastity. For an undue indulgence 
of our appetites and passions is contrary to benevolence, 
as tending to hurt ourselves or others ; and so opposite to 
the general good, and the divine command, in which all the 
crime of such indulgence consists. In short, all virtue is 
nothing but benevolence acted out in its proper nature and 
perfection ; or love to God and our neighbor, mad© perfect 
in all its genuine exercises and expressions. 

2. That all sm consists In selfishness. By this is meant 



HOPKINSIANS. 



439 



an interested, selfish affection, by which a person sets him- 
self up as supreme, and the only object of regard ; and 
nothing is good or lovely in his view, unless suited to pro- 
mote his own private interest. This self-love is, in its 
whole nature, and every degree of it, enmity against God: 
Tt is not subject to the law of God, and is the only affection 
that can oppose it. It is the foundation of all spiritual 
blindness, and therefore the source of all the open idolatry 
in the heathen world, and false religion under the light of 
the Gospel; all this is agreeable to that self-love which 
opposes God's true character. Under the influence of this 
principle, men depart from truth ; it being itself the great- 
est practical lie in nature, as it sets up that which is com- 
paratively nothing above universal existence. Self-love is 
the source of all profaneness and impiety in the world, and 
of all pride and ambition among men, which is nothing but 
selfishness, acted out in this particular way. This is the 
foundation of all covetousness and sensuality, as it blinds 
people's eyes, contracts their hearts, and sinks them down, 
60 that they look upon earthly enjoyments as the greatest 
good. This is the source of all falsehood, injustice, and 
oppression, as it excites mankind by undue methods to in • 
vade the property of others. Self-love produces all the 
violent passions ; envy, wrath, clamor, and evil speaking : 
and everything contrary to the divine law is briefly com- 
prehended in this fruitful source of all iniquity, self-love. 

3. That there are no promises of regenerating grace 
made to the doings of the unregenerate. For as far as 
men act from self-love, they act from a bad end : for those 
who have no true love to God, really do no duty when they 
attend on the externals of religion. And as the unregene- 
rate act from a selfish principle, they do nothing which is 
commanded : their impenitent doings are wholly opposed 
to repentance and conversion ; therefore not implied in tho 



440 



HOPKINSIAN^j. 



command to repent, &c. ; so far from this, they are alto- 
gether disobedient to the command. Hence it appears 
tiiat there are no promises of salvation to the doings of the 
unregenerate. 

4. That the impotency of sinners, with respect to be- 
lieving in Christ, is not natural, but moral ; for it is a plain 
dictate of common sense, that natural impossibility excludes 
all blame. But an unwilling mind is universally considered 
as a crime, and not as an excuse, and is the very thing 
wherein our wickedness consists. That the impotence of 
the sinner is owing to a disaffection of heart, is evident 
from the promises of the Gospel. When any object of good 
is proposed and promised to us upon asking, it clearly 
evinces that there can be no impotence in us with respect 
to obtaining it, beside the disapprobation of the will ; 
and that inability which consists in disinclination, never 
renders anything improperly the subject of precept or 
command. 

5. That, in order to faith in Christ, a sinner must approve 
in his heart of the divine conduct^ even though God should 
cast him off forever ; which, however, neither implies love 
of misery, nor hatred of happiness. For if the law is good, 
death is due to those who have broken it. The Judge of all 
the earth cannot but do right. It will bring everlasting 
reproach upon his government to spare us, considered 
merely as in ourselves. When this is felt in our hearts, 
and not till then, we shall be prepared to look to the free 
grace of God, through the redemption which is in Christ, 
and to exercise faith in his blood, who is set forth to be a 
propitiation to declare God's righteousness, that he might 
be Just, and yet he the justifier of him who believeth in 
Jesus. 

6. That the infinitely wise and holy God has exerted his 
omnipotent power in such a manner as he purposed shou' i 



HOPKINS lANS. 



441 



be followed with tlie existence and entrance of moral evil 
into the system. For it must be admitted on all hands, 
that God has a perfect knowledge, foresight, and view of all 
possible existences and events. If that system and scene 
of operation, in which moral evil should never have existed, 
was actually preferred in the divine mind, certainly the 
Deity is infinitely disappointed in the issue of his own ope- 
rations. Nothing can be more dishonorable to God than 
to imagine that the system which is actually formed by the 
divine hand, and which was made for his pleasure and 
glory, is yet not the fruit of wise contrivance and design 

7. That the introduction of sin is, upon the whole, for 
the general good. For the" wisdom and power of the Deity 
are displayed in carrying on designs of the greatest good ; 
and the existence of moral evil has undoubtedly occasioned 
a more full^ perfect, and glorious discovery of the infinite 
perfections of the divine nature, than could otherwise have 
been made to the view of creatures. If the extensive mani- 
festations of the pure and holy nature of God, and his m- 
finite aversion to sin, and all his inherent perfections, in 
their genuine fruits and efiects, is either itself the greatest 
good, or unnecessarily contains it, it must necessarily follow 
that the introduction of sin is for the greatest good. 

8. That repentance is before faith in Christ. — By this 
is not intended, that repentance is before a speculative 
belief of the being and perfections of God, and of the person 
and character of Christ ; but only that true repentance is 
previous to a saving faith in Christ, in which the believer 
is united to Christ, and entitled to the benefits of his media- 
tion and atonement. That repentance is before faith, in 
this sense, appears from several considerations. 1. As 
repentance and faith respect difierent objects, so they are 
distinct exercises of the heart ; and therefore one not only 
may, but must be prior to the other. 2. There may be 



442 



HOPKINSIANS. 



genuine repentance of sin Tvithout faith in Christ, but there 
cannot be true faith in Christ "without repentance of sin; 
and since repentance is necessary in order to faith in Christ, 
it must necessarily be prior to faith in Christ. 8. John 
the Baptist, Christ and his apostles, taught that repentance 
IS before faith. John cried. Repent^ for the kingdom of 
heaven is at hand ; intimating that true repentance was 
necessary in order to embrace the Gospel of the kingdom. 
Christ commanded, Repent ye^ and believe the Gospel. And 
Paul preached repentance toward God, and faith toward 
our Lord Jesus Christ. 

9. That though men became sinners by Adam, according 
to a divine constitution, yet they have and are accountable 
for no sins but personal : for, 1. Adam's act, in eating the 
forbidden fruit, was not the a^t of his posterity ; therefore 
they did not sin at the same time he did. 2. The sinful- 
ness of that act could not be transferred to them after- 
wards, because the sinfulness of an act can no more be 
transferred from one person to another than an act itself 
3. Therefore Adam's act, in eating the forbidden fruit, was 
not the cause, but only the occasion of his posterity's being 
sinners. God was pleased to make a constitution, that, if 
Adam remained holy through his state of trial, his poste- 
rity should in consequence be holy also ; but if he sinned, 
nis posterity should in consequence be sinners likewise. 
Adam sinned, and now God brings his posterity into the 
world sinners. By Adam's sin we are become sinners, not 
for it ; his sin being only the occasion, not the cause of our 
committing sins. 

10. That though believers are justified through Christ's 
righteousness, yet his righteousness is not transferred to 
them. For, 1. Personal righteousness can no more be 
transferred from one person to another, than personal sin, 
2. If Christ's personal righteousness were transferred to 



ER ASTI AN S. 



443 



believers, they would be as perfectly holy as Christ ; and 
so stand in no need of forgiveness. 3. But believers are 
not conscious of having Christ's personal righteousness, but 
feel and bewail much indwelling sin and corruption. 4. 
The Scripture represents believers as receiving only the 
benefits of Christ's righteousness in justification, or their 
being pardoned and accepted for Christ's righteousness* 
sake, and this is the proper Scripture notion of imputation. 
Jonathan's righteousness was imputed to Mephibosheth, 
when David showed kindness to him for his father Jona- 
than's sake. 

The Hopkinsians warmly contend for the doctrine of the 
divine decrees^ that of particular election, total depravity, 
the special influences of the Spirit of God in regeneration, 
justification by faith alone, the final perseverance of the 
saints, and the consistency between entire freedom and 
absolute dependence ; and therefore claim it as their just 
due, since the world will make distinctions, to be called 
Hopkinsian Calvinists. 



EKASTIANS. 

The Erastians are so called from Erastus, a German 
divine of the sixteenth century. The pastoral office, 
according to him, was only persuasive, like a professor of 
science over his students, without any power of the keys 
annexed. The Lord's Supper and other ordinances of the 
Gospel were to be free and open to all. The minister 
might dissuade the vicious and unqualified from the com- 
munion; but might not refuse it, or inflict any kind of 
censure ; the punishment of all offences, either of a civil 
or religious nature, being referred to the civil magistrate. 



444 



DANCERS. 



— D A VIDISTS. 



DANCERS. 

The Dancers were a sect wliicli sprung up about 1373, 
in Flanders, and places about. It was their custom all of 
a sudden to fall a dancing, and, holding each other's hands, 
to continue thereat, till, being suffocated with the extraor- 
dinary violence, they fell down breathless together. 
During these intervals of vehement agitation they pretended 
they were favored with wonderful visions. Like the 
Whipp^rs, they roved from place to place, begging their 
victuals, holding their secret assemblies, and treating the 
priesthood and worship of the church with the utmost con- 
tempt. Thus we find, as Dr. Haweis observes, that the 
French Convulsionists and Welch Jumpers have had pre- 
decessors of the same stamp. There is nothing new under 
t^-A sun. 



DAYIDISTS. 

The Davidists were the adherents of David George, a 
Qative of Delft, who, in 1525, began to preach a new 
doctrine, publishing himself to be the true Messiah ; and 
that he was sent of God to fill heaven, which was quite 
empty for want of people to deserve it. He is likewise 
said to have denied the existence of angels, good and evil, 
and to have disbelieved the doctrine of a future judgment. 
He rejected marriage with the Adamites ; held with 
Manes, that the soul was not defiled by sin ; and laughed 
4C the self-denial so much recommended by Jesus Christ. 



CL CC El ANS. 



445 



Such were his principal errors. He made his escape froru 
Delft, and retired first into Friesland, and then to Basil, 
where he changed his name, assuming that of John Bruck, 
and died in 1556. He left some disciples behind him, to 
whom he promised that he would rise again at the end of 
three years. Nor was he altogether a false prophet 
herein ; for the magistrates of that city being informed, at 
the three years' end, of what he had taught, ordered him 
to be dug up, and burnt, together with his writings, by 
the common hangman. 



COCCEIANS. 

The Cocceians were a denomination which arose in the 
seventeenth century ; so called from John Cocceius, pro- 
fessor of divinity in the university of Leyden. He rep- 
resented the whole history of the Old Testament as a 
mirror, which held forth an accurate view of the transac- 
tions and events that were to happen in the church under 
the dispensation of the New Testament, and unto the end 
of the world. He maintained that by far the greatest 
part of the ancient prophecies foretold Christ's ministry 
and mediation, and the rise, progress, and revolutions of 
the church, not only under the figure of persons and trans- 
actions, but in a literal manner, and by the very sense of 
the words used in these predictions ; and laid it down as 
a fundamental rule of interpretation, that the words and 
phrases of Scripture are to be understood in every sense 
of which they are susceptible, or, in other words, that they 
signify in effect everything that they can possibly signify. 

Cocceius also t\ught, that the covenant made between 

38 



446 



COCCEIANS. 



God and the Jewish nation, hj the ministry of Moses, waa 
of the same nature as the new covenant, obtained by the 
mediation of Jesus Christ. In consequence of this general 
principle, he maintained that the ten commandments were 
promulgated by Moses, not as a rule of obedience, but as 
a representation of the covenant of grace — that when the 
Jews had provoked the Deity by their various transgres- 
sions, particularly by the worship of the golden calf, the 
severe and servile yoke of the ceremonial law was added 
to the decalogue, as a punishment inflicted on them by the 
Supreme Being in his righteous displeasure — that this 
yoke, which was painful in itself, became doubly so on 
account of its typical signification ; since it admonished 
the Israelites from day to day of the imperfection and 
uncertainty of their state, filled them with anxiety, and 
was a perpetual proof that they had merited the righteous 
displeasure of God, and could not expect, before the coming 
of the Messiah, the entire remission of their iniquities — 
that indeed good men, even under the Mosaic dispensation, 
were immediately after death made partakers of everlasting 
glory ; but that they were nevertheless, during the whole 
course of their lives, far removed from that firm hope and 
assurance of salvation, which rejoices the faithful under 
the dispensation of the Gospel — and that their anxiety 
flowed naturally from this consideration, that their sins, 
though they remained unpunished, were not pardoned; 
b^Q^us^ Christ had not as yet ofi'ered himself up a sacrifice 
t) the Father, to make an entire atonement for them. 



COLLEGIANS. — BEREANS. 



447 



COLLEGIANS. 

Collegians, or Collegiants, a sect formed among the 
Arminians and Anabaptists in Holland, about the begin- 
ning of the seventeenth century ; so called because of 
their colleges or meetings twice every week, where every 
one, females excepted, has the same liberty of expounding 
the Scriptures, praying, &c. They are said to be all either 
Arians or Socinians ; they never communicate in the col- 
lege, but meet twice a year, from all parts of Holland, at 
Rhinsbergh, (whence they are also called Bhinsherghers) 
a village two miles from Leyden, where they communicate 
together ; admitting every one that presents himself, pro- 
fessing his faith in the divinity of the Holy Scriptures, 
and resolution to live suitably to their precepts and doc- 
trines, without regard to his sect or opinion. They have 
no particular ministers, but each officiates as he is disposed. 
They baptize by immersion. 



BEREANS. 

The Bereans are a sect of Protestant Dissenters from 
the Church of Scotland, who take their title from and pro- 
fess to follow the example of the ancient Bereans, in 
building their system of faith and practice upon the Scrip- 
tures alone, without regard to any human authority what- 
ever. 

As to the origin of this sect, we find that the Bereans 
first assembled as a separate society of Christians, in the 



448 



BERE ANS. 



city of Edinburgli, in the autumn of 1773, and soon after 
in the parish of Fettercairn. The opponents of the Be- 
rean doctrines allege that the new system of faith would 
never have been heard of, had not Mr. Barclay, the founder 
of it, been disappointed of a settlement in the Church of 
Scotland. But the Bereans, in answer to this charge, 
appeal not only to Mr. Barclay's doctrine, uniformly 
preached in the church of Fettercairn, and many other 
places in that neighborhood, for fourteen years before that 
benefice became vacant, but likewise to two difierent trea- 
tises, containing the same doctrines, published by him 
about ten or twelve years before that period. They ad- 
mit, indeed, that previous to May, 1773, when the general 
assembly, by sustaining the king's presentation in favor 
of Mr. Foote, excluded Mr. Barclay from succeeding to 
the church of Fettercairn (notwithstanding the almost 
unanimous desire of the parishioners), the Bereans had 
not left the established church, nor attempted to erect them- 
selves into a distinct society ; but they add, that this was 
by no means necessary on their part, until by the assem- 
bly's decision they were in danger of being not only de- 
prived of his instructions, but of being scattered as sheep 
without a shepherd. And they add, that it was Mr. Bar- 
clay's open and public avowal, both from the pulpit and 
the press, of those peculiar sentiments which now distin- 
guish the Bereans, that was the first and principal, if not 
the only cause of the opposition set on foot against his 
Bettlement in Fettercairn. 

The Bereans agree with the great majority of Christians 
respecting the doctrine of the Trinity, which they hold as 
a fundamental article ; and they also agree in a great mea- 
sure with the professed principles of both the established 
churches respecting predestination and election, though 
they aF.ege that these doctrines are not consistently taught 



BERE ANS. 



449 



m either churcli. But tliey differ from tlie majority of all 
sects of Christians in various other important particulars, 
such as, 1. Respecting our knowledge of the Deity. Upon 
this subject they say, the majority of professed Christians 
stumble at the very threshold of revelation; and, by ad- 
mitting the doctrine of natural religion, natural conscience, 
natural notices, etc., not founded upon revelation, or do- 
rived from it by tradition, they give up the cause of Chris- 
tianity at once to the infidels ; who may justly argue, as 
Mr. Paine in fact does in his Age of Reason, that theie is 
no occasion for any revelation or word of God, if man can 
discover his nature and perfections from his works alone. 
But this the Bereans argue is beyond the natural powers 
of human reason ; and therefore our knowledge of God ia 
from revelation alone, and that without revelation man 
would never have entertained an idea of his existence. 2. 
With regard to faith in Christ, and assurance of salvation 
through his merits, they differ from almost all other sects 
whatsoever. . These they reckon inseparable, or rather the 
same, because (say they) " God hath expressly declared, 
he that believeth shall be saved ; and therefore it is not 
only absurd but impious, and in a manner calling God a 
liar, for a man to say, I believe the gospel, but have 
doubts, nevertheless, of my own salvation." With regard 
to the various distinctions and definitions that have been 
given of different kinds of faith, they argue that there is 
nothing incomprehensible or obscure in the meaning of 
this word as used in Scripture ; but that as faith, when 
applied to human testimony, signifies neither more nor less 
than the mere simple belief of that testimony as true, 
upon the authority of the testifier, so, when applied to the 
testimony of God, it signifies precisely " the belief of his 
testimony, and resting upon his veracity alone, without 
any kind of collateral support from concurrence of any 

88* 2 D 



450 



BERE ANS. 



otber evidence or testimony whatever." And they insist 
that, as this faith is the gift of God alone, so the person 
to whom it is given is as conscious of possessing it as the 
being to whom God gives life is of being alive ; and there- 
fore he entertains no doubts either of his faith or his con- 
Bequent salvation through the merits of Christ, who died 
and rose again for that purpose. In a word, they argue 
that the gospel would not be what it is held forth to be, 
glad tidings of great joy, if it did not bring full personal 
assurance of eternal salvation to the believer ; which assu- 
rance, they insist, is the present infallible privilege and 
portion of every individual believer of the gospel. 3. 
Consistently with the above definition of faith, they say 
that the sin against the Holy Ghost, which has alarmed 
and puzzled so many in all ages, is nothing else but unbe- 
lief ; and that the expression " it shall not be forgiven 
neither in this world nor that which is to come," means 
only that a person dying in infidelity would not be for- 
given, neither under the former dispensation by Moses 
(the then present dispensation, kingdom, or government 
of God), nor under the gospel dispensation which, in re- 
spect of the Mosaic, was a kind of future world or king- 
iom to come. 4. The Bereans interpret a great part of 
the Old Testament prophecies, and in particular the whole 
of the Psalms, excepting such as are merely historical or 
laudatory, to be typical or prophetical of Jesus Christ, his 
sufferings, atonement, mediation, and kingdom ; and they 
esteem it a gross perversion of these Psalms and prophe- 
cies to apply them to the experiences of private Christians, 
In proof of this, they not only urge the words of the apos- 
tle, that no prophecy is of any private interpretation, but 
they insist that the whole of the quotations from the an- 
cient prophecies in the New Testament, and particularly 
those from the Psalms, are expressly applied to Christ. 



BER B ANS. 



451 



In this opmicQ many other classes of Protestants agree 
with them. 5. Of the absolute all-superintending sove- 
reignty of the Almighty, the Bereans entertain the highest 
idea, as well as of the uninterrupted exertion thereof over 
all his works, in heaven, earth, and hell, however unsearch- 
able by his creatures. A God without election, they 
argue, or choice in all his works, is a God without exist- 
ence, a mere idol, a nonentity. And to deny God's elec- 
tion, purpose, and express will in all his works, is to mako 
him inferior to ourselves. 

As to their practice and discipline^ they consider infant 
baptism as a divine ordinance, instituted in the room of 
circumcision ; and think it absurd to suppose that infants, 
who, all agree, are admissible to the kingdom of God in 
heaven, should nevertheless be incapable of being admitted 
into his visible church on earth. They commemorate the 
Lord's Supper generally once a month ; but as the words 
of the institution fix no particular period, they sometimes 
celebrate it oftener, and sometimes at more distant periods, 
as it may suit their general convenience. They meet 
every Lord's day for the purpose of preaching, praying, 
and exhorting to love and good works. With regard to 
admission and exclusion of members, their method is very 
simple : when any person, after hearing the Berean doc- 
trines, professes his belief and assurance of the truths of 
the gospel, and desires to be admitted into their commu- 
nion, ho is cheerfully received upon his profession, what- 
ever may have been his former manner of life. But if 
such a one should afterwards draw back from his good 
profession or practice;^ they first admonish him, and, if 
that has no efi'ect, they leave him to himself. They do 
not think that they have any power to deliver a backslid- 
ing brother to Satan ; that text, and other similar passa^ 
gcs«, such as, " Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shaii h% 



452 



AQNOET^, 



bound in lieaven/' etc., they consider as restricted to the 
apostles, and to the inspired testimony alone, and not to 
be extended to any church on earth, or any number of 
churches or of Christians, whether decided by a majority 
of votes, or by unanimous voices. Neither do they think 
themselves authorized, as a Christian church, to inquire 
into each other's political opinions, any more than to exa- 
mine into each other's notions of philosophy. They both 
recommend and practise, as a Christian duty, submission 
to lawful authority ; but tliey do not think that a man, by 
becoming a Christian, or joining their society, is under 
any obligation by the rules of the gospel to renounce his 
right of private judgment upon matters of public or pri- 
vate importance. Upon all such subjects they allow each 
other to think and act as each may see it his duty ; and 
they require nothing more of the members than a uniform 
and steady profession of the apostolic faith, and a suitable 
walk and conversation. 

It is said that their doctrine has found converts in vari 
ous places of Scotland, England, and America ; and thai 
they have congregations in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Paisley, 
Stirling, Crieff, Dundee, Arbroath, Montrose, Fettercairn, 
Aberdeen, and other towns in Scotland, as well as in Lon- 
don, and various places in England. 



AGNOETJE. 

Agnoet^ (from ayvost^, "to be ignorant of,"), a sect 
which appeared about 370. They called in question the 
omniscience of God ; alleging that he knew things past 
only by memory, and things future only by an uDcertair; 



ALBANENSES. 



453 



prescience. There arose another sect of the same name 
in the sixth century, who followed Themistius, deacon of 
Alexandria. They maintained that Christ was ignorant 
of certain things, and particularly of the time of the day 
of judgment. It is supposed they built their hypothesis 
on that passage in Mark xiii. 32 : — " Of that day and that 
hour knoweth no man; no, not the angels which are in 
heaven, neither the Son, but the Father." The meaning 
of which most probably is, that this was not known to the 
Messiah himself in his human nature, or by virtue of his 
unction, as any part of the mysteries he was to reveal ; 
for, considering him as God, he could not be ignorant of 
anything. 



ALBANENSES. 

Albanenses, a denomination which commenced about 
the year 796. They held, with the Gnostics and Mani- 
cheans, two principles, the one of good and the other of 
evil. They denied the divinity and even the humanity of 
Jesus Christ ; asserting that he was not truly man, did 
not suffer on the cross, die, rise again, nor really ascend 
into heaven. They rejected the doctrine of the resurrec- 
tion, affirmed that the general judgment was paat, and that 
hell torments were no other than the evils we feel and 
suffer in this life. They denied free-will, did not admit 
original sin, and never administered baptism to infants. 
They held that a man can give the Holy Spirit of himself, 
and that it is unlawful for a Christian to take an oath. 

This denomination derived their name from the place 
where their spiritual n:ler resided. 



454 



LATITUDINAR1AN8. 



LATITUDINARIANS. 

Latitudinarian, a person aot conforming to any par- 
ticular opinion or standard, but of such moderation as to 
suppose that people will be admitted into heaven, although 
of different persuasions. The term was more especially 
applied to those pacific doctors in the seventeenth century, 
who offered themselves as mediators between the more vio- 
lent Episcopalians and the rigid Presbyterians and Inde- 
pendents, respecting the forms of Church government, 
public worship, and certain religious tenets, more espe- 
cially those that were debated between the Aiminians and 
Calvinists. The chief leaders of these Latitudinarians 
were Hales and Chillingworth ; but More, Cudworth, Gale, 
Whitchcot, and Tillotson were also among the number. 
These men, although firmly attached to the Church of 
England, did not go so far as to look upon it as of divine 
institution ; and hence they maintained, that those who 
followed other forms of government and worship, were 
not on that account to be excluded from their communion. 
As to the doctrinal part of religion, they took the system 
of Episcopius for their model, and, like him, reduced the 
fundamental doctrines of Christianity to a few points ; and 
by this manner of proceeding they endeavored to show the 
contending parties that they had no reason to oppose each 
other with such anim^osity and bitterness, since the subjects 
of their debates were matters of an indifferent nature with 
respect to salvation. They met, however, with opposition 
for their pains, and were branded as Atheists and Deists 
by some, and as Socinians by others ; but upon the resto- 
ration of Charles 11. , they were raised to the first digni- 
ties of the Church, and wore held in considerable esteem. 



ORIQENISTS. 



455 



ORIGENISTS. 

The Origenists were a denomination whicL appeared m 
•he thiid century, who derived their opinions from tho 
writings of Origen, a presbyter of Alexandria, and a man 
of vast and uncommon abilities, who interpreted the divine 
truths of religion according to the tenor of the Platonic 
philosophy. He alleged that tlie source of many evils lies 
in adhering to the literal and external part of Scripture ; 
and that the true meaning of the sacred writers was to be 
sought in a mysterious and hidden sense, arising from the 
nature of things themselves. 

The principal tenets ascribed to Origen, together with a 
few of the reasons made use of in their defence, are com- 
prehended in the following summary : — 

1. That there is a pre-existent state of human souls. 
For the nature of the soul is such as to make her capable 
of existing eternally, backward as well as forward, because 
her spiritual essence, as such, makes it impossible that she 
should, either through age or violence, bo dissolved; so 
that nothing is wanting to her existence but the good plea- 
sure of him from whom all things proceed. And if, ac- 
cording to the Platonic scheme, we assign the production 
of all things to the exuberant fulness of life in the Deity, 
which, through the blessed necessity of his communicative 
nature, empties itself into all possibilities of being, as into 
so many capable receptacles, we must suppose her exist- 
ence in a sense necessary, and in a degree co-eternal with 
God. 

2. That souls wei:e condemned to animate mortal bodies 
in order to expiate faults they had committed in a pre- 



456 



ORIGENISTS. 



exisient state ; for we may be assured, from the infinite 
goodness of their Creator, that they were at first joined 
to the purest matter, and placed in those regions of the 
universe which were most suitable to the purity of essence 
they then possessed. For that the souls of men are an 
order of essentially incorporate spirits, their deep immer- 
sion into terrestrial matter, the modification of all their 
operations by it, and the heavenly body promised in the 
gospel, as the highest perfection of our renewed nature, 
clearly evince. Therefore, if our souls existed before they 
appeared inhabitants of the earth, they were placed in a 
purer element, and enjoyed far greater degrees of happi- 
ness. And certainly He, whose overflowing goodness 
brought them into existence, would not deprive them of 
their felicity, till by their mutability they rendered them 
selves less pure in the whole extent of their powers, and 
became disposed for the susception of such a degree of 
corporeal life as was exactly answerable to their present 
disposition of spirit. Hence it was necessary that they 
should become terrestrial men. 

3. That the soul of Christ was united to the "Word be- 
fore the incarnation. For the Scriptures teach us that 
the soul of the Messiah was created before the beginning 
of the world, Phil. ii. 5, 7. This text must be understood 
of Christ's human soul, because it is unusual to propound 
the Deity as an example of humility in Scripture. Though 
the humanity of Christ was so God-like, he emptied him- 
self of this fulness of life and glory, to take upon Mm 
the form of a servant. It was this Messiah who conversed 
with the patriarchs under a human form ; it was he who 
appeared to Moses upon the Holy Mount ; it was he who 
spoke to the prophets under a visible appearance ; and it 
is he who will at last come in triumph upon the clouds to 
restore the universe to its primitive splendor and felicity. 



ORIGENISTS. 



457 



4. That at the resurrection of the dead we shall be 
clothed with ethereal bodies. For the elements of our 
terrestrial compositions are such as almost fatally entangle 
us in vice, passion, and misery. The purer the vehicle the 
soul is united with, the more perfect is her life and opera- 
tions. Besides, the Supreme Goodness who made all 
things, assures us he made all things best at first, and 
therefore his recovery of us to our lost happiness (which 
IS the design of the gospel) must restore us to our better 
bodies and happier habitations, which is evident from 
1 Cor. XV. 49 ; 2 Cor. v. 1 ; and other texts of Scripture. 

5. That, after long periods of time, the damned shall 
be released from their torments, and restored to a new 
state of probation. For the Deity has such reserves in 
his gracious providence, as will vindicate his sovereign 
goodness and wisdom from all disparagement. Expiatory 
pains are a part of his adorable plan ; for this sharper 
kind of favor has a righteous place in such creatures aS 
are by nature mutable. Though sin has extinguished or 
silenced the divine life, yet it has not destroyed the facul- 
ties of reason and understanding, consideration and me 
mory, which will serve the life which is most powerful. If, 
therefore, the vigorous attraction of the sensual nature be 
abated by a ceaseless pain, these powers may resume the 
Bense of a better life and nature. As in the material sys- 
tem there is a gravitation of the less bodies towards the 
greater, there must of necessity be something analogous 
to this in the intellectual system; and since the spirits 
created by God are emanations and streams from his own 
abyss of being, and as self-existent power must needs sub- 
ject all beings to itself, the Deity could not but impress 
upon her intimate natures and substances a central ten- 
dency towards himself; an essential principle of re-union 
to their great original. 

39 



458 



PETRO BRUSSIANS. 



6. That the earth, after its conflagration, shall become 
habitable again, and be the mansion of men and animals, 
and that in eternal vicissitudes. For it is thus expressed 
in Isaiah : Behold 1 make new heavens and a new earthy 
^c, and in Heb. i. 10, 12, Thou^ Lord, in the beginning 
hast laid the foundations of the earth; as a vesture shalt 
thou change them, and they shall he changed, ^c. Where 
there is only a change the substance is not destroyed, this 
change being only as that of a garment worn out and de- 
caying. The fashion of the world passes away like a 
turning scene, to exhibit a fresh and new representation 
of things ; and if only the present dress and appearance 
of things go off, the substance is supposed to remain 
entire. 



PETROBRUSSIANS. 

Petrobrussians, a sect founded about the year 1110, 
m Languedoc and Provence, by Peter de Bruys, who made 
the most laudable attempts to reform the abuses and to 
remove the superstitions that disfigured the beautiful sim- 
plicity of the Gospel; though not without a mixture of 
fanaticism. The following tenets were held by him and 
his disciples : — 1. That no persons whatever were to be 
baptized before they were come to the full use of their 
reason. 2. That it was an idle superstition to build 
churches for the service of God, who will accept of a sin- 
cere worship wherever it is offered ; and that, therefore, 
such churches as had already been erected, were to be 
pulled down and destroyed. 3. That the crucifixes, as 
instruments of superstition, deserved the same fate. 4. 
That the real body and blood of Christ were not exhibited 



PAULIANISTS. 



459 



in the eucharist, but were merely represented in that ordi- 
nance. 5. That the oblations, prayers, and good works 
of the living, could be in no respect advantageous to the 
dead. The founder of this sect, after a laborious ministry 
«)f twenty years, was burnt in the year 1130, by an enraged 
populace set on by the clergy, whose traffic was in dang-er 
Jrom the enterprising spirit of this new reformer. 



PAULIANISTS. 

The Paulianists were a sect so called from their founder, 
Paalus Samosatenus, a native of Samosata, elected bishop 
of Antioch in 262. His doctrine seems to have amounted 
to this : that the Son and the Holy Ghost exist in God in ' 
thd same manner as the faculties of reason and activity do 
in man ; that Christ was born a mere man ; but that the 
reason or wisdom of the Father descended into him, and 
by him wrought miracles upon earth, and instructed the 
nations ; and, finally, that on account of this union of the 
Divine Word with the man Jesus, Christ might, though 
improperly, be called God. It is also said that he did not 
baptize in the name of the Father, and the Son, &c. ; for 
which reason the council of Nice ordered those baptized 
by him to be re-baptized. Being condemned by Dionysiua 
Alexandrinus in a council, he abjured his errors to avoid 
ieposition ; but soon after he resumed them, and was 
actually deposed by another council in 269. He may be 
considered as the father of the modern Socinians ; and his 
errors are severely condemned by the council of Nice, 
whose crted differs a little from that now used under the 



460 



PAULICIANS. 



• same name in tlie church of England. The creed agreed 
upon by the Nicene fathers with a view to the errors of 
Paulus Samosatenus concludes thus : But those who say 
there was a time when he was not, and that he was not ♦ 
before he was born, the catholic and apostolic church 
anathematize." 



PAULICIANS. 

The Paulicians were a branch of the ancient Manichees, 
so called from their founder, one Paulus, an Armenian, in 
the seventh century, who, with his brother John, both of 
Samosata, formed this sect : though others are of opinion 
that they were thus called from another Paul, an Armenian 
by birthj who lived under the reign of Justinian IL In 
the seventh century, a zealot, called Constantine, revived 
this drooping sect, which had suffered much from the 
violence of its adversaries, and was ready to expire under 
the severity of the imperial edicts, and that zeal with 
which they were carried into execution. The Paulicians, 
however, by their number, and the countenance of the 
emperor Kicephorus, became formidable to all the East. 
But the cruel rage of persecution, which had for some 
years been suspended, broke forth with redoubled violence 
under the reigns of Michael Curopalates, and Leo the 
Armenian, who inflicted capital punishment on such of the 
Paulicians as refused to return into the bosom of the 
church. The empress Theodora, tutoress of the emperor 
Michael, in 845, would oblige them either to be converted, 
or to quit the empire ; upon which several of them were 
put to death, and more retired among the Saracens ; but 
they were neither all exterminated nor banished. 



P A ULICI ANS. 



461 



on this, thej entered into a league with the Saracens, * 
a^id uhoosing for their chief an officer of the greatest reso- 
lution and valor, whose name was Carbeus, thej declared 
agsuust the Greeks a war, which was carried on for fiftj 
yea»'« with the greatest vehemence and fury. During 
thef*^ commotions, some Paulicians, towards the conclusic a 
of 1 his century, spread abroad their doctrines among the 
Bu) ^arians : many of them, either from a principle of zeal 
for the propagation of their opinions, or from a natural 
dcrtire of flying from the persecution which they suiFered 
under the Grecian yoke, retired about the close of the 
ehventh century from Bulgaria and Thrace, and formed 
settlements in other countries. Their first migration was 
into Italy ; whence, in process of time, they sent colonies 
into almost all the other provinces of Europe, and formed 
gradually a considerable number of religious assemblies, 
who adhered to their doctrine, and who were afterwards 
persecuted with the utmost vehemence by the Boman 
pontiffs. In Italy they were called Patarini, from a cer- 
tain place called Pataria, being a part of the city of 
Milan, where they held their assemblies ; and Grathari, or 
Gazari, from Gazaria, or the Lesser Tartary. In France 
they were called Albigenses, though their faith differed 
widely from that of the Albigenses whom Protestant writers 
generally vindicate. The first religious assembly the 
Paulicians had formed in Europe, is said to have been dis- 
covered at Orleans in 1017, under the ^ reign of Bobert, 
when many of them were condemned to be burnt alive. 
The ancient Pauliciams, according to Photius, expressed 
the utmost abhorrence of Manes and his doctrine. The 
Greek writers comprise their errors under the six follow- 
ing particulars : — 1. They denied that this inferior and 
visible world is the production of the Supre me Being ; and 
they distinguish the Creator of the world and of human 

39* 



462 



LIBERTINES. 



bodies from the Most High God, who dwells in the hea- 
yens ; and hence some have been led to conceive thai 
they were a branch of the Gnostics rather than of the 
Manichasans. 2. They treated contemptuously the Virgin 
Mary, or, according to the usual manner of speaking 
among the Greeks, they refused to adore and worship her. 
8. They refused to celebrate the institution of the Lord's 
Supper. 4. They loaded the cross of Christ with contempt 
and reproach, by which we are only to understand that 
they refused to follow the absurd and superstitious practice 
of the Greeks, who paid to the pretended wood of the 
cross a certain sort of religious homage. 5. They rejected, 
after the example of the greatest part of the Gnostics, the 
books of the Old Testament, and looked upon the writers 
of that sacred history as inspired by the Creator of this 
world, and not by the Supreme God. 6. They excluded 
presbyters and elders from all part in the administration 
of the church. 



LIBERTINES. 

The Libertines were a religious sect which arose in the 
year 1525, whose principal tenets were, that the Deity was 
the sole operating cause in the mind of man, and the im- 
mediate author of all human actions ; that, consequently^ 
the distinctions of good and evil, which had been esta- 
blished with regard to those actions, were false and 
groundless, and that men could not, properly speaking, 
commit sin ; that religion consisted in the union of the 
spirit, or rational soul, with the Supreme Being ; that all 
those who had attained this happy union, by sublime con- 



LIBERTINES. 



463 



templation and elevation of tnind, were then allowed to 
indulge, without exception or restraint, their appetites or 
passions ; that all their actions and pursuits were then per 
fectly innocent ; and that, after the death of the body, 
they were to be united to the Deity. They likewise said 
that Jesus Christ was nothing but a mere je ne scai quoi, 
composed of the spirit of God and the opinion of men. 
These maxims occasioned their being called Libertines^ 
and the word has been used in an ill sense ever since. 
This sect spread principally in Holland and Brabant 
Their leaders were one Quintin, a Picard, Pockesius, Ruf 
fus, and another, called Chopin, who joined with Quintin, 
and became his disciple. They obtained footing in France 
through the favor and protection of Margaret, Queen of 
Navarre, and sister to Francis I., and found patrons in 
several of the reformed churches. 

The Libertines of Geneva were a cabal of rakes rather 
than fanatics ; for they made no pretence to any religious 
system, but pleaded only for the liberty of leading volup- 
tuous and immoral lives. This cabal was composed of a 
certain number of licentious citizens, who could not bear 
the severe discipline of Calvin. There were also among 
them several who were not only notorious for their disso- 
lute and scandalous manner of living, but also for their 
atheistical impiety and contempt of all religion. To this 
odious class belonged one Gruet, who denied the divinity 
of the Christian religion, the immortality of the soul, the 
difference between moral good and evil, and rejected with 
disdain the doctrines that are held most sacred among 
Christians ; for which impieties he was at last brought be- 
fore the civil tribunal, in the year 1550, and condemned to 
ieath. 



464 



INGH AMITEB. 



IXGHAMTES, 

A DENOMINATION of Calvinistic Dissenters, vlio aie the 
followers of B. Ingham. Esq., who in the last centnrv waa 
a character of great note in the north of England. About 
the year 1735, ^ir. Ingham was at Queen's College, with 
Jklr. Hervey and other friends, but aoon afterwards adopted 
the religious opinions and zeal of Wesley and Whitfield. 
We do not know the cause of his separation from these 
eminent men ; but it seems in a few years afterwards he 
became the leader of numerous societies, distinct from the 
Methodists. They received their members by lot, and 
required them to declare before the church their experi- 
ence, that the whole society might judge of the gracious 
change which had been wrought upon their hearts. It 
happened in a few years, that some individuals who were 
much respected, and who applied for admission, instead of 
speaking of their own attainments, or the comfortable im- 
pression on their minds, which they only considered as 
productive of strife and vainglory, declared their only 
hope was the finished work of Jesus Christ ; as to them- 
selves they were sensible of their own vileness. Such 
confessions as this threw the congregation into some con- 
fusion, which was considerably increased when they found 
that, on their having recotirse as usual to the lot, that 
there were votes against their admission, which was consi- 
dered as a rejection from the Lord. On this they were 
led to examine more particularly both their church order 
and doctrines. After this time, ^Ir. Ingham became much 
more orthodox in his sentiments, and new-modelled his 
churches. The book which he published is in general well 



HATTEMISTS 



465 



thought of by the Independents. He contends very 
strongly for salvation by the imputation of Christ's right- 
eousness ; and as to doctrine, the chief point wherein the 
Inghamites differ from the Independents is respecting the 
Trinity. The common manner of speaking of the Divine 
Three as distinct persons, they decisively condemn. They 
do not consider a plurality of elders as necessary in a 
church to administer the Lord's Supper. In other respects 
they much esteem the writings of Mr. R. Sandeman. 
Their numbers have not been so numerous since they be« 
came more strict in their public worship. 



HATTEMISTS. 

This is the name of a modern Dutch sect, so called 
from Pontian Van Hattem, a minister in the province of 
Zealand, towards the close of the last century, who, being 
addicted to the sentiments of Spinosa, was on that account 
degraded from his pastoral oflSce. The Verschorists and 
Hattemists resemble each other in their religious systems, 
though they never so entirely agreed as to form one com- 
munion. The founders of these sects dedua^d from the 
doctrine of absolute decrees a system of fatal and uncon- 
trollable necessity; they denied the difference between 
moral good and evil, and the corruption of human nature ; 
from whence, they farther concluded, that mankind were 
under no sort of obligation to correct their manners, to 
improve their minds, or to obey the divine laws ; that the 
whole of religion consisted not in acting, but in suffering ; 
and that all the precepts of Jesus Christ are reducible to 
this one, that we hear with cheerfulness and 'patience the 

2E 



466 



EUNOMIANS. 



events that happen to us through the divine tviU, and maJci 
it our constant and only study to 7naintain a permanent 
tranquillity of mind. Thus far they agreed; but tlie 
Hattemists further affirmed, that Christ made no expiation 
for the sins of men by his death ; but had only suggested 
to usj by his mediation, that there was nothing in us that 
could offend the Deity : this, they say, was Christ's man- 
ner of justifying his servants, and presenting them blame- 
less before the tribunal of God. It was one of their dis- 
tinguished tenets, that God does not punish men for their 
Bins, but hy their sins. These two sects, says Mosheim, 
still subsist, though they no longer bear the name of their 
founders. 



EUNOMIANS. 

The Eunomians were a sect in the fourth century. They 
were a branch of Arians, and took their name from Euno- 
mius, bishop of Cyzicus. Cave, in his Historia Liter aria^ 
vol. i. p. 223, gives the following account of their faith: 
" There is one God, uncreated and without beginning ; who. 
has nothing existing before him, for nothing can exist be- 
fore what is uncreated ; nor with him, for what is uncreated 
must be one ; nor in him, for God is a simple and uncom 
pounded being. This one simple and eternal being is God, 
the creator and ordainer of all things : first, indeed, and 
principally of his only begotten Son ; and then through 
him of all other things. For God begat, created, and made 
the Son only by his direct operation and power, before all 
things, and every other creature ; not producing, however, 
any being like himself, or imparting any of Ms own proper 



EU CHITES. 



467 



substance to the Son ; for God is immortal, uniform, indi- 
visible ; and therefore cannot communicate any part of his 
own proper substance to another. He alone is unbegotten; 
and it is impossible that any other being should be formed 
of an unbegotten substance. He did not use his own sub- 
stance in begetting the Son, but his will only ; nor did he 
beget him in the likeness of his substance, but according 
to his own good pleasui-e ; he then created the Holy Spirit, 
the first and greatest of all spirits, by his own power, in 
deed and operation mediately ; yet by the immediate power 
and operation of the Son. After the Holy Spirit, he created 
all other things, in heaven and in earth, visible and invisi- 
ble, corporeal and incorporeal, mediately by himself, by 
the power and operation of the Son, &c." The reader 
will evidently see how near these tenets are to those of 
Arianism. 



EUCHITES. 

The Euchites, or Euchitae, were a sect of ancient here- 
tics, who were first formed into a religious body towards 
the end of the fourth century, though their doctrine and 
discipline subsisted in Syria, Egypt, and other eastern coun- 
tries, before the birth of Christ : they were thus called be- 
cause they prayed without ceasing, imagining that prayer 
alone was sufficient to save them. They were a sort of 
mystics, who imagined, according to. the oriental notion, 
that two souls resided in man, the one good and the other 
evil ; and who were zealous in expelling the evil soul or 
demon, and hastening the return of the good Spirit of God 
y> J contemplation, j)rayer, and singing of hymns. They 



468 



EBIONITES. 



also embraced opinions nearly resembling the Manicbean 
doctrine, and wbicb tbey derived from tbe tenets of tbe 
oriental pbilosopby. The same denomination was used in 
the twelfth century to denote certain fanatics who infested 
the Greek and Eastern churches, and who were charged 
with believing a double Trinity, rejecting wedlock, abstain 
ing from flesh, treating with contempt the sacraments of 
baptism and the Lord's Supper, and the various branches 
of external worship, and placing the essence of religion 
solely in external prayer ; and maintaining the efficacy of 
perpetual supplications to the Supreme Being for expelling 
an evil being or genius, which dwelt in the breast of every 
mortal. This sect is said to have been founded by a person 
called Lucopetrus, whose chief disciple vfas named Tychious. 
By degrees it became a general and invidious appellation 
for persons of eminent piety, and zeal for genuine Chris- 
tianity, who opposed the vicious practices and insolent 
tyranny of the priesthood, much in the same manner as the 
Latins comprehended all the adversaries of the Roman 
pontiff under the general terms of Albigenses and Wal- 
denses. 



EBIONITES, 

The Ebionites were ancient heretics, who rose in the 
church in the very first age thereof, and formed themselves 
into a sect in the second century, denying the divinity of 
Jesus Christ. Origen takes them to have been so called 
from the Hebrew word ehion^ which in that languoge sig- 
nifies poor ; because, says he, they were poor in sense and 
wanting understanding. Euoebius, with a view to the same 
etymology, is of opinion chey were thus called, as having 



EBIONITES. 



469 



poor thoughts of J esus Christ, taking him for no more than 
a mere man. It is more prohable the Jews gave this ap- 
pellation to the Christians in general out of contempt; 
because, in the first times, there were few but poor people 
that embraced the Christian religion. 

The Ebionites were little else than a branch of the I^^aza- 
renes, only that they altered and corrupted, in many things, 
the purity of the faith held among the first adherents to 
Christianity. For this reason, Origen distinguishes two 
kinds of Ebionites in his answer to Celsus : the one believed 
that Jesus Christ was born of a virgin ; and the other, that 
he was born after the manner of other men. The first were 
orthodox to everything, except that to the Christian doc- 
trine they joined the ceremonies of the Jewish law, with the 
Jews, Samaritans, and Nazarenes, together with the tradi- 
tions of the Pharisees. They difiered from the Nazarenes, 
however, in several things, chiefly as to what regards the 
authority of the sacred writings; for the Nazarenes re- 
ceived all for Scripture contained in the Jewish canon; 
whereas the Ebionites rejected all the prophets, and held 
the very names of David, Solomon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and 
Ezekiel, in abhorrence. They also rejected all St. Paul's 
epistles, whom they treated with the utmost disrespect. 
They received nothing of the Old Testament but the Pen- 
tateuch. They agreed with the Nazarenes, in using the 
Hebrew Gospel of St. Matthew, otherwise called the Gospel 
of the twelve apostles ; but they corrupted their copy in 
abundance of places; and particularly had left out the 
genealogy of our Saviour, which was preserved entire iL 
that of the Nazarenes, and even in those used by the 
Corinthians. 

Besides the Hebrew Gospel of St. Matthew, the Ebion 
ites had adopted several other books under the title of St. 
Tames, John, and the other apostles ; they also made use 

40 



470 



DONATISTS. 



of tlie travels of St. Peter, which are supposed to have been 
written by St. Clement ; but had altered them so, that there 
was scarce anything of truth left in them. They even made 
that saint tell a number of falsehoods, the better to autho- 
rize their own practices- 



DONATISTS. 

The Donatists were ancient schismatics, in Africa so 
denominated from their leader, Donatus. They had their 
origin in the year 311, when, in the room of Mensurius, 
who died in that year, on his return to Rome, Cecilian was 
elected bishop of Carthage, and consecrated, without the 
concurrence of the Numidian bishops, by those of Africa 
alone, whom the people refused to acknowledge, and to 
whom they opposed Majorinus, who accordingly was or 
dained by Donatus, bishop of Casae Nigrce. 

They were condemned in a council held at Rome, two 
years after their separation ; and afterwards in another at 
Aries, the year following ; and again at Milan, before Con- 
Btantine the Great, in 316, who deprived them of theii 
churches, and sent their seditious bishops into banishment, 
and punished some of them with death. Their cause was 
espoused by another Donatus, called the Great, the prin- 
cipal bishop of that sect, who, with numbers of his follow- 
ers, was exiled by order of Constans. Many of them were 
punished with great severity. However, after the accession 
of Julian to the throne in 362, they were permitted to re- 
turn, and restored to their former liberty. 

Gratian published several edicts against them, and in 377 
deprived them of theii^ chui'ches, and prohibited all their 



DON ATISTS. 



471 



assemblies. But, notwithstanding the severities they suf- 
fered, it appears that they had a very considerable number 
of churches towards the close of this century ; but at this 
time they began to decline on account of a schism among 
themselves, occasioned by the election of two bishops in the 
room of Parmenian, the successor of Donatus : one party 
elected Primian, and were called Primianists ; and an- 
other, Maximinian, and were called Maximinianists. Their 
decline was also precipitated by the zealous opposition of 
St. Augustine, and by the violent measures which were 
pursued against them by order of the emperor Honorius, 
at the solicitation of two councils held at Carthage, the one 
in 404, and the other in 411. Many of them were fined, 
their bishops were banished, and some put to death. 

This sect revived and m Jtiplied under the protection 
of the Vandals, who invaded Africa in 427, and tooK pos- 
session of this province ; but it sunk again under new seve- 
rities, when their empire was overturned, in 534. Never- 
theless, they remained in a separate body till the close of 
this century, when Gregory, the Roman pontiff, used various 
methods for suppressing them : his zeal succeeded, and there 
are few traces to be found of the Donatists after this pe- 
riod. They were distinguished by other appellations, as 
CircumceUiones, Montenses or Ifountaineers, CampeteSy 
Hupites, &c. They held three councils, that of Cita in 
Numidia, and two at Carthage. 

The Donatists, it is said, held that baptism conferred out 
of the church, that is, out of their sect, was null ; and 
accordingly they re-baptized those who joined their party 
from other churches, they also re-ordained their ministers. 
Donatus seems likewise to have embraced the doctrine of 
the Arians ; though St. Augustine affirms that the Donatista 
in this point kept clear of the errors of their leader. 



472 



OSISTS. 



DEISTS. 

The Deists are a class of people whose distinguisliing 
character it is not to profess any particular form or system 
of religion, but only to acknowledge the existence of a 
God, and to follow the light and law of Nature, rejecting 
revelation and opposing Christianity. The name of Deists 
seems to have been first assumed as the denomination of a 
party, about the middle of the sixteenth century, by some 
gentlemen in France and Italy, who were desirous of thus 
disguising their opposition to Christianity by a more honor- 
able appellation than that of atheists. Viret, an eminent 
reformer, mentions certain persons in his epistle dedica- 
tory, prefixed to the second volume of his Instruction 
Chretienne, published in 1553, who called themselves by a 
new name, that of Deists. These, he tells us, professed 
to believe in God, but showed no regard to Jesus Christ, 
and considered the doctrines of the apostles and evangelists 
as fables and dreams. He adds, that they laughed at all 
religion, though they outwardly conformed to the religion 
of those with whom they lived, or whom they wished to 
please, or feared to ofiend. Some, he observed, professed 
to believe the immortality of the soul ; others denied both 
this doctrine and that of providence. 

Many of them were considered as persons of acute and 
subtle genius, and took pains in disseminating their notions. 
The Deists hold that, considering the multiplicity of reli- 
gions, the numerous pretences to revelation, and the pre- 
carious arguments generally advanced in proof thereof, 
the best and surest way is to return to the simplicity of 
nature, and the belief of one God; which is the only 



DEISTS. 



473 



truth agreed to by all nations. They complain that the 
freedom of thinking and reasoning is oppressed under the 
yoke of religion, and that the minds of men are tyrannized 
over by the necessity imposed upon them of believing in- 
conceivable mysteries ; and contend that nothing should 
be required to be assented to or believed but what their 
reason clearly conceives. 

The distinguishing character of modern Deists is, that 
they discard all pretences to revelation as the effects of 
imposture or enthusiasm. They profess a regard for natu- 
ral religion, though they are far from being agreed in theii 
notions concerning it. 

They are classed by some of their own writers into mor- 
tal and immortal Deists — the latter acknowledging a fu- 
ture state, and the former denying it, or representing it as 
very uncertain. Dr. Clarke distinguishes four sorts of 
Deists : 1. Those who pretend to believe the existence of 
an eternal, infinite, independent, intelligent Being, who 
made the world, without concerning himself in the govern- 
ment of it. 2. Those who believe the being and natural 
providence of God, but deny the difference of actions as 
morally good or evil, resolving it into the arbitrary consti- 
tution of human laws ; and therefore they suppose that God 
takes no notice of them. With respect to both these classes, 
he observes, that their opinions can consistently terminate 
in nothing but downright atheism. 3. Those who, having 
right apprehensions concerning the nature, attributes, and 
all-governing providence of God, seem also to have some 
notion of his moral perfections ; though- they consider 
them as transcendant, and such in nature and degree, that 
we can form no true judgment, nor argue with any cer- 
tainty concerning, them ; but they deny the immortality of 
human souls, alleging that men perish at death, and that 
the present life is the whole of human existence. 4. Those 

40* 



474 



DEISTS. 



who believe the existence, perfections, and providence of 
God, the obligations of natural religion, and a state of 
future retribution, on the evidence of the light of Nature, 
without a divine revelation; such as these, he says, are 
the only true Deists ; but their principles, he apprehends, 
should lead them to embrace Christianity, and therefore 
he concludes that there is now no consistent scheme of 
Deism in the world. 

The first Deistical writer of any note that appeared in 
England was Herbert, Baron of Cherbury. He lived and 
wrote in the seventeenth century. His book Be Veritate 
was first published at Paris, in 1624. This, together with 
his book Be Qausis Errorum, and his treatise Be Religione 
Laici^ were afterwards published in London. His cele- 
brated work. Be Religione Gentilium, was published at 
Amsterdam, in 1663, in 4to., and in 1700 in 8vo. ; and an 
English translation of it was published at London in 1705. 

As he was one of the first that formed Deism into a 
system, and asserted the sufficiency, universality, and ab- 
solute perfection of natural religion, with a view to discard 
all extraordinary revelation as useless and needless, we 
shall subjoin the five fundamental articles of this universal 
religion. They are these : 1. There is one supreme God. 
2. That he is chiefly to be worshipped. 3. That piety and 
virtue are the principal part of his worship. 4. That we 
must repent of our sins ; and if we do so, God will pardon 
them. 5. That there are rewards for good men and pun- 
ishments for bad men, both here and hereafter. A num- 
ber of advocates have appeared in the same cause ; and 
however they may have difiered among themselves, they 
have been agreed in their attempts at invalidating the evi- 
dence and authority of divine revelation. We might men- 
tion Hobbes, Blount, Toland, Collins, Woolston, Tindal, 
Morgan, Chubb, Lord Bolinr^Woke, Hume, Gibbon, Paine, 



SUBLAPSARIANS. 



475 



and some add Lord Shaftesbury to the nuraber. Among 
foreigners, Voltaire, Rousseau, Condorcet, and many 
other celebrated French authors, have rendered themselves 
conspicuous by their Deistical writings. "But," as one 
observes, " the friends of Christianity have no reason to 
regret the free and unreserved discussion which their reli- 
gion has undergone. Objections have been stated and 
urged in their full force, and as fully answered ; arguments 
and raillery have been repelled ; and the controversy be- 
tween Christians and Deists has called forth a great num- 
ber of excellent writers, who have illustrated both the 
doctrines and evidences of Christianity in a manner that 
will ever reflect honor on their names, and be of lasting 
service to the cause of genuine religion, and the best inte- 
rests of mankind. 



SUBLAPSAEIANS. 

SuBLAPSARiANS are those who hold that God permitted 
the first man to fall into transgression, without absolutely 
predetermining his fall ; or that the decree of predestina- 
tion regards man as fallen, by an abuse of that freedom 
which Adam had, into a state in which all were to be left 
to necessary and unavoidable ruin, who were not exempted 
from it by predestination. 



476 



SrPRALAPSARIANS. 



SUPRALAPSARIANS. 

The Supralapsarians are persons who hold that God, 
without any regard to the good or evil works of men, has 
resolved, by an eternal decree, swpra lajosum^ antecedently 
to any knowledge of the fall of Adam, and independently 
of it, to save some and reject others : or, in other words, 
that God intended to glorify his justice in the condemna- 
tion of some, as well as his mercy in the salvation of others ; 
and for that purpose, decreed that Adam should necessarily 
fall. 

Dr. Gill gives us the following account of Supralapsa- 
rianism. The question which he proposes to discuss, is, 
" Whether men were considered in the mind of God in the 
decree of election as fallen or unfallen, as in the corrupt 
mass through the fall, or in the pure mass of creatureship, 
previous to it, and as to be created V There are some who 
think that the latter, so considered, were the objects of elec- 
tion in the divine mind. These are called Supralapsarians, 
though of these some are of opinion that man was consid- 
ered as to be created or creatable, and others as created 
but not fallen. The former seems best, that of the vast 
number of individuals which came up in the divine mind 
whom his power could create, those whom he meant to 
bring into being he designed to glorify himself by them in 
some way or other. The decree of election respecting any 
part of them may be distinguished into the decree of the 
end and the decree of the means. The decree of the end 
respecting some is either subordinate to their eternal hap- 
piness, or ultimate, which is more properly the end, the 
glory of God ; and if both are put together, it is a state 



SUPRALAPSARIANS. 



477 



of everlasting communion with God, for the glorifying of the 
riches of his grace. The decree of the means includes the 
decree to create men to permit them to fall, to recover them 
out of it through redemption hj Christ, to sanctify them 
by the grace of the Spirit, and completely sav^them ; and 
which are not to be reckoned as materially many decrees, 
but as making one formal decree ; or they are not to he 
considered as subordinate, but as co-ordinate means, and 
as making up one entire complete medium : for it is not to 
be supposed that God decreed to create man, that he might 
permit him to fall, in order to redeem, sanctify, and save 
him ; but he decreed all this that he might glorify his grace, 
mercy, and justice. And in this way of considering the 
decrees of God, they think that they sufficiently obviate 
and remove the slanderous calumny cast upon them with 
respect to the other branch of predestination, which leaves 
men in the same state when others are chosen, and that for 
the glory of God. Which calumny is that, according to 
them, God made man to damn him ; whereas, according to 
their real sentiments, God decreed to make man, and made 
man neither to damn him nor save him, but for his own 
glory, which end is answered in them some way or other. 
Again, they argue that the end is first in view before the 
means, and the decree of the end is, in order of nature, 
before the decree of the means ; and what is first in inten- 
tion, is last in execution. Now, as the glory of God is last 
in execution, it must be first in intention, wherefore men 
must be considered in the decree of the end as not yet 
created and fallen ; since the creation and permission of sin 
belong to the decree of the means, which in order of nature 
is after the decree of the end. And they add to this, that 
if God first decreed to create man, and sufiered him to fall, 
and then out of the fall chose some to grace and glory, he 
must decree to create man without an end, which is to make 



/ 



478 SUPRALAPSARIANS. 

God to do what no wise man would ; for when a man is 
about to do anything, he proposes an end, and then con- 
trives and fixes on wajs and means to bring about that end. 
Thej think also that this way of conceiving and speaking 
of these things best expresses the sovereignty of God in 
them, as decTared in the 9th of Eomans, where he is said 
to will such and such things, for no other reason but because 
he wills them. 

The opponents of this doctrine consider, however, that 
it is attended with insuperable difficulties. We demand, 
say they, an explanation of what they mean by this prin- 
ciple, " God hath made all things for his own glory." If 
they mean that justice requires a creature to devote him- 
self to the worship and glorifying of his Creator, we grant 
it ; if they mean that the attributes of God are displayed 
in all his works, we grant this too ; but if the proposition 
be intended to affirm that God had no other view in creating 
men, so to speak, than his own interest, we deny the pro- 
position, and affirm that God created men for their own 
happiness, and in order to have subjects upon whom he 
might bestow favors. 

"We desire to be informed, in the next place, say they, 
how it can be conceived that a determination to damn mil- 
lions of men can contribute to the glory of God? We 
easily conceive that it is for the glory 'of divine justice to 
punish guilty men ; but to resolve to damn men without 
the consideration of sin, to create them that they might 
sin, to determine that they should sin in order to their 
destruction, is what seems to us more likely to tarnish the 
glory of God than to display it. 

Again, we demand how, according to this hypothesis, it 
can be conceived that God is not the author of sin ? In 
the general scheme of our churches, God only permits men 
to sin, and it is the abuse of liberty that plunges man into 



RELLYANI6TS. 



479 



misery : even this principle, all lenified as it seems, is yet 
subject to a great number of difficulties ; but in this scheme 
God wills sin to produce the end he proposed in creating 
the world, and it was necessary that men should sin : God 
created them for that. If this be not to make God the 
author of sin, we must renounce the most distinct and clear 
ideas. ♦ 

Again, we require them to reconcile this system with 
many express declarations of Scripture, which inform us 
that God would have all men to be saved. How doth it 
agree with such pressing entreaties, such cutting reproofs, 
such tender expostulations, as God discovers in regard to 
the unconverted ? Matt, xxiii. 37. 

Lastly, we desire to know, how is it possible to conceive 
a God, who being in the actual enjoyment of perfect hap- 
piness, incomprehensible and supreme, could determine to 
add this decree, though useless to his felicity, to create men 
without number for the purpose of confining them for ever 
in the chains of darkness, and burning them for ever in 
unquenchable flames. 



■RELLYANISTS. 

The Kellyanists, or Rellyan Universalists are the fol- 
lowers of Mr. James Kelly. He first commenced his 
ministerial character in connection with Mr. Whitefield, 
and was received with great popularity. Upon a change 
of his views, he encountered reproach, and was pronounced 
by many as an enemy to godliness. He believed that 
Christ, as a Mediator, was so united to mankind, that his 
actions were theirs, his obedience and sufferings tbeirp ; 



480 



RELL-JANlbTS. 



and, consequently, that he has as fully restored the whole 
human race to the divine favor, as if all had obeyed and 
suffered in their own persons ; and upon this persuasion 
he preached a finished salvation, called by the apostle 
Jude, " The common salvation." 

Many of his followers are removed to the world of 
spirits, but a branch still survives. They are not observers 
of ordinances, such as water-baptism and the sacrament ; 
professing to believe only in one baptism, which they call 
an immersion of the mind or conscience into truth by the 
teaching of the Spirit of God ; and by the same Spirit 
they are enabled to feed on Christ as the bread of life, 
professing that in and with Jesus they possess all things. 
They inculcate and maintain good works for necessary 
purposes ; but contend that the principal and only work 
which ought to be attended to, is the doing of real good 
without religious ostentation ; that to relieve the miseries 
and distresses of mankind, according to our ability, is 
doing more real good than the superstitious observance of 
religious ceremonies. 

In general, they appear to believe that there will be a 
resurrection to life, and a resurrection to condemnation ; that 
believers only will be among the former, who as first fruits, 
and kings and priests, will have part in the first resurrec- 
tion, and shall reign with Christ in his kingdom of the 
millennium ; that unbelievers who are after raised, must 
wait the manifestation of the Saviour of the world, under 
that condemnation of conscience which a mind in darkness 
and wrath must necessarily feel ; that believers, called 
kings and priests, will be made the medium of communica- 
tion to their condemned brethren, and like Joseph to his 
brethren, though he spoke roughly to them, in reality over 
flowed with affection and tenderness ; that ultimately every 
knee shall bow, and every tongue confess that in the Lord 



MONOPHYSITES. 



481 



they have righteousness and strength ; and thus every 
enemy shall be subdued to the kingdom and glory of the 
Great Mediator. A Mr. Murray belonging to this society 
emigrated to America, and preached these sentiments at 
Boston and elsewhere. Mr. Relly published several works, 
the principal of which were, "Union," The Trial of 
Spirits," "Christian Liberty," "One Baptism," "The 
Salt of Sacrifice," "Antichrist Resisted," "Letters on 
Universal Salvation," " The Cherubimical Mystery." 



MONOPHYSITES. 

MoNOPHYSiTES is (from fxovos, solus, and (putf*?, natura,) a 
general name given to all those sectaries in the Levant 
who only own one nature in Jesus Christ ; and who main- 
tain that the divine and human nature of Jesus Christ 
were so united as to form only one nature, yet without any 
change, confusion, or mixture of the two natures. 

The Monofhy sites, however, properly so called, art. the 
followers of Severus, a learned monk of Palestine, who 
was created patriarch of Antioch, in 513, and Petrus 
Fullensis. 

The Monophysites were encouraged by the emperor 
Anastasius, but suppressed by Justin and succeeding 
emperors. However, this sect was restored by Jacob 
Baradseus, an obscure monk, insomuch that when he died 
bishop of Edessa, A. D. 588, he left it in a most flourishing 
state in Syria, Mesopotamia, Armenia, Egypt, Nubia, 
Abyssinia, and other countries. The laborious efforts of 
Jacob were seconded in Egypt and the adjacent countries 
by Theodosius, bishop of Alexandria ; and he became so 

41 2 F 



482 



MONOPHYSITES. 



r'amous, that all the Monophysites of the East coDsidered 
him as their second parent and founder, and aie to this 
day called Jacobites, in honor of their new chief. 

The Monophysites are divided into two sects or parties, 
the one African and the other Asiatic ; at the head of the 
latter is the patriarch of Antioch, who resides for the most 
part in the monastery of St. Athanias, near the city of Mer- 
din ; the former are under the jurisdiction of the patriarch 
of Alexandi'ia, who generally resides at Grand Cairo, and 
are suhdivided into Cophts and Abyssinians. From the 
fifteenth century downwards, all the patriarchs of the 
Monophysites have taken the name of Ignatius, in order 
to show that they are the lineal successors of Ignatius, 
who was bishop of Antioch in the first century, and con 
sequently the lawful patriarch of Antioch. In the seven- 
teenth century, a small body of Monophysites, in Asia, 
abandoned for some time the doctrine and institution of 
their ancestors, and embraced the communion of Rome ; 
bat the African Monophysites, notwithstanding that 
poverty and ignorance which exposed them to the seduc- 
tions of sophistry and gain, stood firm in their principles, 
and made an obstinate resistance to the promises, presents, 
and attempts employed by the papal missionaries to bring 
them under the Roman- yoke; and in the eighteenth cen- 
tury, those of Asia and Africa have persisted in their 
refusal to enter into the communion of the Romish church, 
notwithstanding the earnest entreaties and alluring ofi"ers 
that have been made from time to time by the pope's 
legates, to conquer their inflexible constancy. 



MONOTHELITES. — CAKMATUITES. 483 



MONOTHELITES. 

MuAOJMiAiiri'ES, (compounded of jxovog, " single," and 
and ^gXy)(ji-a, ^f>w, volo, "I will,") an ancient sect, wMch 
sprung out of tho Eutychians ; thus called, as only allow- 
ing of one will in Jesus Christ. 

The opinion of che Mcnothelites had its rise in 630, and 
had the emperor Heraclius for an adherent; it was the 
same with that of the acephalous Severians. Thej allowed 
of two wills in Christ-, considered with regard to the two 
natures ; but reduced them to one by reason of the union 
of the two natures, thinking it absurd that there should be 
two free wills in one and the same person. They were 
condemned by the sixth gci^eral council in 680, as being 
supposed to destroy the perfection of the humanity of 
Jesus Christ, depriving it of will and operation. Their 
sentiments were afterwards embiaced by the Maronites. 



CAKMATHITES. 

Carmathites, the followers of a sioted impostor in the 
ninth century, who endeavored to overthrow all the foun- 
dations of Mussulmanism. Carmath theii prophet was a 
person of great austerity of life ; and said that God had 
commanded him to pray not five times, with the Mussul- 
mans, but fifty times a day. To comply with 'this, they 
often neglected their business ; they ate many things for- 
bidden by the law of Mahomet, and believed that angels 
were their guides in all their actions, and that the demons 
or ghosts are their enemies. 



484 



SADDUCEES. 



— SAMARITANS. 



SADDUCEES. 

The Sadducees were a famous sect among the Jews ; so 
called, it is said, from their founder Sadoc. It began in 
the time of Antigonus, of Socho, president of the Sanhe- 
drim at Jerusalem, and teacher of the law in the principal 
divinity school of that city. Antigonus having often, in 
his lectures, inculcated to his scholars that they ought not 
to serve God in a servile manner, but only out of filial 
love and fear, two of his scholars, Sadoc and Baithus, 
thence inferred that there were no rewards at all after 
this life ; and, therefore, separating from the school of 
their master, they thought there was no resurrection nor 
future state, neither angel nor spirit, Matt. xii. 23 ; Acts 
xxiii. 8. They seem to agree greatly with the Epicureans ; 
dijGfering, however, in this, that though they denied a future 
state, yet they allowed the power of God to create the 
world ; whereas the followers of Epicurus denied it. It is 
said also, they rejected the Bible, except the Pentateuch ; 
denied predestination ; and taught that God had made man 
absolute master of all his actions, without assistance tp 
good, or restraint from evil. 



SAMAEITANS. 

The Samaritans were an ancient sect among the Jews, 
whose origin was in the time of King Rehoboam, under 
whose reign the people of Israel were divided into two 
distinct kingdoms, that of Judah and that of Israel. The 
capital of the kingdom of Israel was Samaria, whence the 



MELC^ XTES. 



485 



Israelites took the name of Samaritans. Shalmanesier, 
king of Assyria, having besieged and taken Samaria, car- 
ried away all the people captives into the remotest parta 
of his dominions, and filled their place with Babylonians, 
Cutheans, and other idolaters. These, finding that they 
w-ere exposed to wild beasts, desired that an Israelitish 
priest might be sent among them to instruct them in the 
ancient religion and customs of the land they inhabited. 
This being granted them, they were delivered from the 
plague of wild beasts, and embraced the law of Moses, 
with which they mixed a great part of their ancient idola- 
try. Upon the return of the Jews from the Babylonish 
captivity, it appears that they had entirely quitted the 
worship of their idols. But though they were united in 
religion, they were not so in afiection with the J ews ; for 
they employed various calumnies and stratagems to hinder 
their rebuilding the temple of Jerusalem ; and when they 
could not prevail, tBey erected a temple on Mount Gerizim 
in opposition to that on Jerusalem. See 2 Kings xvii. ; 
Ezra iv., v., vi. The Samaritans at present are few in 
number, but pretend to great strictness in their observa- 
tion of the law of Moses. They are said to be scattered ; 
some at Damascus, some at Gaza, and some at Grand 
Cairo, in Egypt, 



MELCHITES. 

Melchites, the name given to the Syriac, Egyptian, 
and other Christians of the Levant. The Melchites, ex- 
cepting some few points of little or no importance, which 
relate only to ceremonies and ecclesiastical discipline, are, 
in every respect, professed Greeks ; but they are governed 

41 



486 



CERINTHIANS. — LUCIANISTS. 



t>y a particular patriarcli, who assumes the title of Patri- 
arch of Antioch. They celebrate mass in the Arabian 
ianguagr. The religious among the Melchites follow 
the ruk ^f St. Basil, the common rule of all the Greek 
monks. 



CERINTHIANS. 

The Cerinthians were ancient heretics, who denied the 
deity of Jesus Christ ; so named from Cerinthus. They 
believed that he was a mere man, the son of Joseph and 
Mary ; but that in his baptism a celestial virtue descended 
on him in the form of a dove ; by means whereof he was 
consecrated by the Holy Spirit, made Christ, and wrought 
BO many miracles ; that, as he received it from heaven, it 
quitted him after his passion, and r(iturned to the place 
whence it came; so that Jesus, whom they called 21, pure 
maUy really died and rose again ; but that Christ, who was 
distinguished from Jesus, did not suffer at all. It was 
partly to refute this sect that St. John wrote his Gospel 
They received the Gospel of St. Matthew, to countenance 
their doctrine of circumcision ; but they omitted the gene- 
alogy. They discarded the epistles of St. Paul, because 
that apostle held circumcision abolished. 



LUCIANISTS. 

LuciANiSTS, or Lucanists, a sect so called from Lucia 
nus, or Lucanus, a heretic of the second century, being a 
disciple of Marcion, whose errors he followed, adding some 
aew ones to them. Epiphanius says he abandoned Mar 



LUCIFERIANS. 



487 



cion, teaching that people ought not to marry, for fear of 
enriching the Creator ; and yet other authors mention, 
that he held this error in common with Marcion and other 
Gnostics. He denied the immortality of the soul, asserting 
it to be material. 

There was another sect of Lucianists, who appeared 
some time after the Arians. They taught that the Father 
had been a Father always, and that he had the name even 
before he had begot the Son, as having in him the power 
and faculty of generation ; and in this manner they ac- 
counted for the eternity of the Son. 



LUCIFERIANS. 

LuciFERiANS, a sect who adhered to the schism of Luci- 
fer, Bishop of Cagliari, in the fourth century, who was 
banished by the Emperor Constantius, for having defended 
the Nicene doctrine concerning the three persons in the 
Godhead. It is said also that ■ they believed the soul to 
be corporeal, and to be transmitted from the father to the 
children. The Luciferians were numerous in Gaul, Spain, 
Egypt, &c. The occasion of this schism was, that Lucifer 
would not allow any acts he had done to be abolished. 
There were but two Luciferian bishops, but a great num- 
ber of priests and deacons. The Luciferians bore i great 
version to the Arians. 



488 



GALILEANS. 



— S ABELLIANS. 



GALILEANS. 

The Galileans were a sect of the Jews wMcli arose m 
Judea, some years after the birth of our Saviour. Thej 
sprang from one Judas, a native of Gaulam, in Upper 
Galilee, upon the occasion of Augustus appointing the 
people to be mustered, which they looked upon as an in- 
stance of servitude which all true Israelites ought to oppose. 
They pretended that God alone should be owned as master 
and lord, and in other respects were of the opinion of the 
Pharisees ; but as they judged it unlawful to pray for 
infidel princes, they separated themselves from the rest of 
the Jews, and performed their sacrifices apart. As our 
Saviour and his apostles were of Galilee, they were sus- 
pected to be of the sect of the Galileans ; and it was on 
this principle, as St. Jerome observes, that the Pharisees 
laid a snare for him, asking. Whether it were lawful to 
give tribute to Caesar ? that in case he denied it, they 
micjht have an occasion of accusincr him. 



SABELLIANS. 

The Sabellians were a sect in the third century that 
embraced the opinions of Sabellius, a philosopher of 
Egypt, who openly taught that there is but one person in 
the Go'lhead. 

The Sabellians maintained that the Word and the Holy 
Spirit are only virtues, emanations, or functions of the 
Deity ; and held that he who is in heaven is the Father of 



MATERIALISTS. 



489 



all things ; that lie descended into the Virgin, became a 
child, and was born of her as a son ; and that, having 
accomplished the mystery of our salvation, he diffused 
himself on the apostles in tongues of fire, and was then 
enominated the Holy Ghost. This they explained by 
mparing God to the sun ; the illuminated virtue or qua- 
lity of which was the Word, and its warming virtue the 
Holy Spirit. The Word, they taught, was darted, like a 
divine ray, to accomplish the work of redemption ; and 
that, being re-ascended to heaven, the influences of the 
Father were communicated after a like manner to the 
apostles. 



MATERIALISTS. 

The Materialists were a sect in the ancient church, 
composed of persons who, being prepossessed with that 
maxim in philosophy, '''ex nihilo nihil jit out of nothing 
nothing can arise, had recourse to an eternal matter, on 
which they supposed God wrought in the creation, instead 
of admitting Him alone as the sole cause of the existence 
of all things. Tertullian vigorously opposed them in his 
treatise against Hermogenes, who was one of their number. 

Materialists are also those who maintain that the soul 
^>f man is material, or that the principle of perception and 
thought is not a substance distinct from the body, but the 
result of corporeal organization. There are others called 
by this name, who have maintained that there is nothing 
but matter in the universe. 

The followers of the late Dr. Priestley are considered as 
Materialists, or Philosophical Necessarians. According to 
the doctor's writing, he believed — 



490 



MATERIALISTS. 



1. That man is no more than what we now see of him ; 
his being commences at the time of his conception, or per- 
haps at an earlier period. The corporeal and mental 
faculties, inhering in the same substance, grow, ripen, and 
decay together ; and whenever the system is dissolved, it 
continues in a state of dissolution, till it shall please that 
Almighty Being, who called it into existence, to restore it 
to life again. For if the mental principle were, in its own 
nature, immaterial and immortal, all its peculiar faculties 
would be so too ; whereas we see that every faculty of the 
mind, without exception, is liable to be impaired, and even 
to become wholly extinct, before death. Since, therefore, 
all the faculties of the mind, separately taken, appear to 
be mortal, the substance, or principle, in which they exist, 
must be pronounced mortal too. Thus we might conclude 
that the body was mortal, from observing that all the 
separate senses and limbs were liable to decay and perish. 

This system gives a real value to the doctrine of the 
resurrection from the dead, which is peculiar to revelation ; 
on which alone the sacred writers build all our hope of 
future life; and it explains the uniform language of the 
Scriptures, which speak of one day of judgment for all 
mankina, and represent all the rewards of virtue, and all 
the punishments of vice, as taking place at that awful day, 
and not before. In the Scriptures the heathens are repre- 
sented as without hope, and all mankind as perishing a^ 
death, if there be no resurrection of the dead. 

The Apostle Paul asserts, in 1 Cor. xv. 16, that if the 
dead rise not, then is not Christ risen ; and if Christ he 
not raised, your faith is vain, ye are yet in your sins : 
then they also who are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. 
And again, verse 32 ; If the dead rise not, let us eat and 
drink, for to-morrow we die. In the whole discourse, he 



MATERIALISTS. 



491 



does not even mention the doctrine of happiness or misery 
without the body. 

If we search the Scriptures for passages expressive of 
the state of man at death, we find such declarations as 
expressly exclude any trace of sense, thought, or enjoy- 
ment. See Ps. VI. 5 ; Job xiv. 7, etc. 

2. That there is some fixed law of nature respecting the 
will, as well as the other powers of the mind, and every- 
thing else in the constitution of nature ; and consequently 
that it is never determined without some real or apparent 
cause foreign to itself ; i, e., without some motive or ch-cice; 
or that motives influence us in some definite and invariable 
manner, so that every volition, or choice, is constantly 
regulated and determined by what precedes it ; and this 
constant determination of mind, according to the motives 
presented to it, is what is meant by its necessary determi- 
nation. This being admitted to be the fact, there will be 
a necessary connection between all things past, present, 
and to come, in the way of proper cause and effect, as 
much in the intellectual as in the natural world ; so that, 
according to the established laws of nature, no event could 
have been otherwise than it has been or is to be, and there- 
fore all things past, present, and to come, are precisely 
what the Author of Nature really intended them to be, 
and has made provision for. 

To establish this conclusion, nothing is necessary but 
that, throughout all nature, the same consequences should 
invariably result from the same circumstances. For, if this 
be admitted, it will necessarily follow, that at the com- 
mencement of any system, since the several parts of it and 
their respective situations were appointed by the Deity, 
the first change would take place according to a certain 
rule established by himself, the result of which would be 
a new situation ; after which the same laws continuing, 



492 



MATERIALISTS. 



another change Trould succeed, according to the same rules, 
and so on forever ; every new situation invariably leading 
to another, and every event, from the commencement to 
the termination of the system, being strictly connected; 
Bo that, unless the fundamental laws of the system were 
changed, it would be impossible that any event should have 
been otherwise than it was. In all these cases, the cir- 
cumstances preceding any change are called the causes of 
that change ; and since a determinate event or effect con- 
stantly follows certain circumstances or causes, the con- 
nection between cause and effect is concluded to be inva- 
riable, and therefore necessary. 

It is universally acknowledged, that there can be no 
effect without an adequate cause. This is even the foun- 
dation on which the only proper argument for the being of 
a God rests. And the Necessarian asserts that if, in any 
given state of mind, with respect both to dispositions and 
motives, two different determinations, or volitions, be pos- 
sible, it can be on no other principle than that one of them 
should come under the description of an effect without a 
cause ; just as if the beam of balance might incline either 
way, though loaded with equal weights. And if anything 
whatever, even a thought in the mind of man, could arise 
without an adequate cause, anything else, the mind itself, 
or the whole universe, might likewise exist without an ade- 
quate cause. 

This scheme of philosophical necessity implies a chain 
of causes and effects established by infinite wisdom, and 
terminating in the greatest good of the whole universe ; 
evils of all kinds, natural and moral, being admitted, as 
far as they contribute to that end, or are in the nature of 
things inseparable from it. Vice is productive not of good, 
but of evil to us, both here and hereafter, though good 
may result from it to the whole system ; and according tky 



MATERIALISTS. 



493 



the fixed laws of nature, our present and future happiness 
necessarily depend on our cultivating good dispositions. 

This scheme of philosophical necessity is distinguished 
from the Calvinistic doctrine of predestination in the fol- 
lowing particulars : 

1. No Necessarian supposes that any of the human raco 
will suffer eternally, but that future punishments will an- 
swer the same purpose as temporal ones are found to do ; 
all of which tend to good, and are evidently admitted for 
that purpose. Upon the doctrine of necessity, also, the 
most indifferent actions of men are equally necessary with 
the most important ; since every volition, like any other 
effect, must have an adequate cause depending upon the 
previous state of the mind, and the influence to which it ia 
exposed. 

2. The Necessarian believes that his own dispositions 
and actions are the necessary and sole means of his pre- 
sent and future happiness ; so that, in the most proper 
sense of the words, it depends entirely on himself whether 
he be virtuous or vicious, happy or miserable. 

8. The Calvinistic system entirely excludes the popular 
notion of free will, viz. : the liberty or power of doing 
what we please, virtuous or vicious, as belonging to every 
person, in every situation ; which is perfectly consistent 
with the doctrine of philosophical necessity, and indeed 
results from it. 

4 The Necessarian believes nothing of the posterity of 
Adam's sinning in him, and of their being liable to the 
wrath of God on that account ; or the necessity of an in- 
fi^nite Being making atonement for them by suffering in 
their stead, and thus making the Deity propitious to them. 
He believes nothing of all the actions of any man being 
necessarily sinful ; but, on the contrary, thinks that the 
very worst of men are capable of benevolent intentions in 

42 



494 



JACOBITES. 



many things that they do ; and likewise that very good 
,men are capable of falling from virtue, and consequently 
of sinking into final perdition. Upon the principles of 
the Necessarian, also, all late repentance, and especially 
after long and confirmed habits of vice, is altogf ther and 
necessarily ineffectual ; there not being sufficient time left 
to produce a change of disposition and character, which 
can only be done by a change of conduct of proportionably 
long continuance. 

In short, the three doctrines of Materialism, Philoso- 
phical Necessity, and Socinianism, are considered as equally 
parts of one system. The scheme of Necessity is the im- 
mediate result of the materiality of marr; for mechanism 
is the undoubted consequence of materialism, and that 
man is wholly material, is eminently subservient to the 
proper or mere humanity of Christ. For if no man have 
a soul distinct from his body, Christ, who in all other re- 
spects appeared as a man, could not have a soul which had 
existed before his body ; and the whole doctrine of the 
pre-existence of souls, of which the opinion of the pre- 
existence of Christ is a branch, will be eff"ectually over- 
turned. 



JACOBITES. 

The Jacobites are a sect of Christians in Syria and 
Mesopotamia; so called, either from Jacob, a Syrian, who 
lived in the reign of the Emperor Mauritius, or from one 
Jacob, a monk, who flourished in the year 550. 

The Jacobites are of two sects, some following the rites 
of the Latin church, and others continuing separated from 
the church of Rome. There is also a division among the 



JANSENISTS. 



495 



latter, who have two rival patriarchs. As to their belief, 
they hold but one nature in Jesus Christ ; with respect to 
purgatory, and prayers for the dead, they are of the same 
opinion with the Greeks and other eastern Christians. 
They consecrate unleavened bread at the eucharist, and 
are against confession, believing that it is not of divine 
institution. 



JANSENISTS. 

The Jansenists were a sect of the E-oman Catholics in 
France, who followed the opinions of Jansenius (bishop of 
Ypres, and doctor of divinity of the universities of Louvain 
and Douay,) in relation to grace and predestination. 

In the year 1640, the two universities just mentioned, 
and particularly father Molina and father Leonard Celsus, 
thought fit to condemn the opinions of the Jesuits on grace 
and free-will. This having set the controversy on foot, 
Jansenius opposed to the doctrine of the Jesuits the senti- 
ments of St. Augustine, and wrote a treatise on grace, 
which he intituled Augustinus. This treatise was attacked 
by the Jesuits, who accused Jansenius of maintaining 
dangerous and heretical opinions ; and afterwards, in 1642, 
obtained of pope Urban VIII. a formal condemnation of 
the treatise written by Jansenius ; when the partisans of 
Jansenius gave out that this bull was spurious, and com- 
posed by a person entirely devoted to the Jesuits. After 
the death of Urban VIII., the affair of Jansenism began 
to be more warmly controverted, and gave birth to a great 
number of polemical writings concerning grace ; and what 
occasioned some mirth, were the titles which each party 
gave to their writings : one writer published the Torch of 



496 



JANSENISTS. 



St. Augustine ; another found Snuffers for St Augustine* f 
Torch : and father Veron formed A Gag for the Jansen- 
ists, to. In the year 1650, sixty-eight bishops of Franco 
Eub^cribed a letter to pope Innocent X., to obtain an 
inquiry into and condemnation of the five following propo- 
sitions, extracted from Jansenins's Augustinus. 1. Some 
of frod's commandments are impossible to be observed by 
the righteous, even though they endeavor with all their 
poT^ er to accomplish them. 2. In the state of corrupted 
natfr^re, we are incapable of resisting inward grace. 3. 
MeHt and demerit, in a state of corrupted nature, do not 
dep-jnd on a liberty which excludes necessity, but on a 
liberty which excludes constraint. 4. The Semipelagians 
adiiiitted the necessity of an inward preventing grace for 
the* performance of each particular act, even for the begin- 
ning of faith ; but they were heretics in maintaining that 
this grace was of such a nature that the will of man was 
able either to resist or obey it. 5. It is Semipelagianism 
to say that Jesus Christ died, or shed his blood, for all 
mankind in general. 

In the year 1652, the pope appointed a congregation 
for examining into the dispute relative to grace. In this 
congregation Jansenius was condemned ; and the bull of 
condemnation, published in May, 1653, filled all the pulpita 
in Paris with violent outcries and alarms against the 
Jansenists. In the year 1656, pope Alexander VII. 
issued another bull, in which he condemned the five pro- 
positions of Jansenius. However, the Jansenists affirmed 
that these propositions were not to be found in this 
book ; but that some of his enemies having caused them to 
be printed on a sheet, inserted them in the book, and 
thereby deceived the pope. At last Clement XL put an 
pnd to the dispute by his constitution of July 17, 1705, in 
whiclr, after having recited the constitutions of his pre- 



497 



decessors in relation to this affair, he declared, " That, in 
order to pay a proper obedience to the papal constitutions 
concerning the present question, it is necessary to receive 
them with a respectful silence." The clergy of Paris, the 
same year, approved and accerpted this bull, and none 
dared to oppose it. This is the famous bull Unigenitus, 
BO called from its beginning with the words Unigenitu9 
Dei Filius, &c., which has occasioned so much confusion 
m France. 

It was not only on account of their embracing the doc- 
trines of Augustine that the Jesuits were so embittered 
against them ; but that which offended the Jesuits, and the 
other creatures of the Roman pontiff, was their strict piety 
and severe moral discipline. The Jansenists cried out 
against the corruptions of the church of Rome, and com- 
plained that neither its doctrines nor morals retained any 
traces of their former purity. They reproached the clergy 
with an universal depravation of sentiments and manners, 
and an entire forgetfulness of the dignity of their charac- 
ter and the duties of their vocation; they censured the 
licentiousness of the monastic orders, and insisted upon 
the necessity of reforming their discipline according to the 
rules of sanctity, abstinence, an'd self-denial, that were 
originally prescribed by their respective founders. They 
maintained, also, that the people ought to be carefully 
instructed in all the doctrines and precepts of Christianity ; 
and that, for this purpose, the Holy Scriptures and public 
liturgies should be offered to their perusal in their mother 
tongue ; and, finally, they looked upon it as a matter of 
the highest moment to persuade all Christians that true 
piety did not consist in the observance of pompous rites, 
or in the performance of external acts of devotion, but in 
inward holiness and divine love. 

Notwithstanding the above-mentioned sentiments, the 

42* 2 a 



498 



J A N S E N I S T S . 



Jansenists have been accused of superstition and fanati- 
cism ; and, on account of their severe discipline and prac- 
Uce, have been denominated Rigorlsts. It is said that 
thev made repentance consist chiefly in those voluntary 
sutTerings -u-hich the transgressor inflicted upon himself, ia 
proportion to the nature of his crimes and the degree of 
his guilt. They tortured and macerated their bodies by 
painful labor, excessive abstinence, continual prayer, and 
contemplation ; nay, they earned these austerities, it is 
said, to so high a pitch, as to place merit in them, and to 
consider those as the sabred victims of repentance who had 
gradually put an end to their days by their excessive 
abstinence and labor. Dr. Haweis, however, in his Church 
History, (vol. iii. p. 46,) seems to form a more favorable 
opinion of them. "I do not," says he, " readily receive 
the accusations that Papists or Protestants have objected 
to them as over-rigorous and fanatic in their devotion ; but 
I will admit many things might be blameable ; a tinctui*e 
of popery might di-ive them to push monkish austerities 
too far, and secretly to place some merit in mortification, 
which they in general disclaimed ; yet, wit^ all that can 
be said, surely the root of the matter was in them. "When 
I read Jansenius, or his disciples Pascal or Quesnel, I bow 
before such distinguished excellencies, ard confess them 
my brethren ; shall I say my fathers ? Their principles 
are pm-e and evangelical ; their morals founded upon the 
apostles and prophets; and their to amend arid con- 
vert, blessed with eminent 



FRENCH PROPHETS. 



499 



FRENCH PROPHETS. 

They first appeared in Dauphiny and Vivarais. In the 
year 1688, five or six hundred Protestants of both sexea 
gave themselves out to be prophets, and inspired of the 
Holy Ghost. They soon became so numerous, that there 
were many thousands of them inspired. They were people 
of all ages and sexes without distinction, though the greatest 
firt of them were boys and girls from six or seven to 
twenty-five years of age. They had strange fits, which 
came upon them with tremblings and faintings as in a swooti, 
which made them stretch out their arms and legs, and stag- 
ger several times before they dropped down. They struck 
themselves with their hands, they fell on their backs, shut 
their eyes, and heaved with their breasts. They remained 
a while in trances, and, coming out of them with twitchings, 
uttered all which came in their mouths. They said they 
saw the heavens open, the angels, paradise, and hell. Those 
who were just on the point of receiving the spirit of pro- 
phecy, dropped down not only in the assemblies, crying out 
mercy, but in the fields, and in their own houses. The 
least of their assemblies made up four or five hundred, and 
some of them amounted to even three or four thousand 
persons. When the prophets had for a while been under 
agitations of body, they began to prophesy. The burden 
of their prophecies was — Amend your lives; repent ye: 
the end of all things draws nigh! The hills resounded with 
their loud cries for mercy, and imprecations against the 
priests, the church, the pope, and against the anti-christian 
dominion, with predictions of the approaching fall of popery. 
All they said at these times was heard and reseived with 
reverence and awe 



500 



FUJilNCn PROPHETS. 



In the year 1706, three or four of these prophets came 
over into England, and brought their prophetic spirit along 
with them, which discovered itself in the same ways and 
manners, by ecstacies, and agitations, and inspirations 
under them, as it had done in France ; and they propa- 
gated the like spirit to others, so that before the year was 
out, there were two or three hundred of these prophets in 
and about London, of both sexes, of all ages, men, women, 
and children ; and they had delivered, under inspiration, 
four or five hundred prophetic warnings. 

The great things they pretended by their spirit was, to 
give warning of the near approach of the kingdom of God, 
the happy times of the church, the millennium state. Their 
message was (and they were to proclaim it as heralds to the 
Jews, and every nation under heaven, beginning at Eng- 
land), that the grand jubilee, the acceptable year of the 
Lord, the accomplishment of those numerous Scriptures 
concerning the new heaven and the new earth, the kingdom 
of the Messiah, the marriage of the Lamb, the first resur^ 
rection, or the ne^w Jerusalem descending from above, Y^ere 
now even at the door ; that this great operation was to be 
wrought on the part of man by spiritual arms only, pro- 
ceeding from the mouths of those who should, by inspira- 
tion, or the mighty gift of the Spirit, be sent forth in great 
numbers ; to labor in the "\aneyard ; that this mission of his 
servants should be witnessed to by signs and wonders from 
heaven, by a deluge of judgments on the wicked universally 
throughout the world, as famine, pestilence, earthquakes, 
kc, ; that the extermination angels shall root out the tares, 
and there shall remain upon the earth only good corn ; and 
the works of men being thrown down, there shall be but 
one Lord, one faith, one heart, one voice among mankind. 
They declared that all the great things they spoke of would 



CIRCONCELLIONES. 



501 



be manifest over the whole earth within the term of three 
years. 

These prophets also pretended to the gift of languages, 
of discerning the secrets of the heart, the gift of ministra- 
tion of the same spirit to others by the laying on of the 
hands, and the gift of healing. To prove they were really 
nspired by the Holy Ghost, they alleged the complete joy 
and satisfaction they experienced, the spirit of prayer, 
which was poured forth upon them, and the answer of theii 
prayer to God. 



CIRCONCELLIONES. 

The Circoncelliones were a species of fanatics, so called 
because they were continually rambling round the houses 
in the country. They took their rise among the Donatists, 
in the reign of the Emperor Constantino. It is incredible 
what ravages and cruelties they committed in Africa, 
through a long series of years. They were illiterate, savage 
peasants, who understood only the Punic language. 

Intoxicated with a barbarous zeal, they renounced agri- 
culture, professed continence, and assumed the title of 
"Vindicators of justice, and protectors of the oppressed." 
To accomplish their mission, they enfranchised slaves, 
scoured the roads, forced masters to alight from their cha- 
riots, and run before their slaves, whom they obliged to 
mount in their place ; and discharged debtors, killing the 
creditors if they refused to cancel their bonds. But the 
chief objects of their cruelty were the Catholics, and espe- 
cially those who had renounced Donatism. 

At first, they used no swords, because God had forbiddeo 



502 



CIRCONCELLIONES. 



the use of one to Peter ; but they were armed witli clubs, 
"which they called the clubs of Israel, and which they han- 
dled in such a manner as to break a man's bones without 
killing him immediately, so that he languished a long time, 
and then died. When they took away a man's life at once> 
they looked upon it as a favor. They became less scrupu- 
lous afterwards, and made use of all sorts Df arms. Their 
shout was, Praise he to God. These words in their mouths 
were the signal of slaughter, more terrible than the roaring 
of a lion. They had invented an unheard-of punishment, 
which was, to cover with lime, diluted with vinegar, the 
eyes of those unhappy wretches whom they had crushed 
with blows and covered with wounds, and to abandon them 
in that condition. 

Never was a stronger proof of what horrors superstition 
can beget in minds destitute of knowledge and humanity. 
These brutes, who had made a vow of chastity, gave them- 
selves up to wine, and all sorts of impurities ; running about 
with women and young guds as drunk as themselves, whom 
they called sacred virgins, and who often carried proofs 
of theu' incontinence. Their chief took. the name of chief 
of the saints. After having glutted themselves with blood, 
they turned their rage upon themselves, and sought death 
with the same fury with which they gave it to others. 
Some scrambled up to the tops of rocks, and cast them 
selves down headlong in multitudes ; others burned them- 
selves, or threw themselves into the sea. 

Those who proposed to acquire the title of martyrs, pub- 
lished it long before ; upon which they were feasted and 
fattened like oxen for the slaughter : after these prepara- 
tions, they set out to be destroyed. Sometimes they gave 
money to those whom they met, and thi-eatened to murder 
them if they did not make them martyrs. 

Theodoret gives an account of a stout young man, who, 



COPHTS 



503 



meeting "with a troop of these fanatics, consented to Mil 
them, provided he might bind them first ; and having hy 
this means put it out of their power to defend themselves, 
whipped them as long as he was able, and then left them 
tied in that manner. Their bishops pretended to blame 
them, but in reality made use of them to intimidate such 
as might be tempted to forsake their sect ; thej even hon- 
ored them as saints. They were not, however, able to 
govern these furious monsters ; and more than once found 
themselves under the necessity of abandoning them, and 
even of imploring the assistance of the secular power 
against them. 

The founts Ursacius and Taurinus were employed to 
quell them ; they destroyed a great number of them, of 
whom the Donatists made as many martyrs. Ursacius, 
who was a Catholic, and a religious man, having lost hia 
life in an engagement with the barbarians, the Donatista 
did not fail to triumph in his death, as an effect of the ven- 
geance of heaven. Africa was the theatre of these bloodj 
scenes during a great part of Constantino's life. 



COPHTS 

CoPHTi, Cophts, or Copti, a name given to the Christians 
of Egypt who are of the sect of the Jacobites. The 
Cophts have a patriarch, who resides at Cairo; but he 
takes his title from Alexandria. He has no archbishop 
under him, but eleven or twelve bishops. The rest of the 
clergy, whether secular or regular, are composed of the 
orders of St. Anthony, St. Paul, St. Macarius, who have 
each their monasteries. Besides the orders of priestt*^ 



50-1 



C P H T S . 



deacons, and sub-deacons, the Cophts have likewise archi- 
mandrites, or abbots ; the dignity whereof they confer 
with all the prayers and ceremonies of a strict ordination. 

By a custom of six hundred years' standing, if a priest 
elected bishop be not already archimandrite, that dignity 
must be conferred on him before episcopal ordination. 
The second person among the clergy after the patriarch, 
is the titular patriarch of Jerusalem, who also resides at 
Cairo. To him belongs the government of the Cophtic 
Church during the vacancy of the patriarchal see. To be 
elected patriarch, it'is necessary the person have lived all 
his life in continence. To be elected bishop the person 
must be in the celibate ; or if he have been married, it 
must not be above once. 

The priests and inferior ministers are allowed to be 
married before ordination ; but not forced to it, as some 
have observed. They have a great number of deacons, 
and even confer the dignity frequently on their children. 
None but the lowest rank among the people commence 
ecclesiastics ; whence arises that excessive ignorance found 
among them ; yet the respect of the laity towards the 
clergy is very extraordinary. The monastic life is in 
great esteem among them ; to be admitted into it, th-cjre is 
always required the consent of the bishop. 

The religious Cophts, it is said, make a vow of perpe- 
tual chastity ; renounce the world, and live with great 
austerity in deserts ; they are obliged to sleep in their 
clothes and their girdle, on a mat stretched on the gr jund; 
and to prostrate themselves every evening one hundred 
and fifty times with their face and breast on the ground. 
They are all, both men and women, of the lowest class of 
the people, and live on alms. The nunneries are properly 
hospitals, and few enter but widows reduced to beggary. 



BABILIDIANS. 



505 



BASILIDIANS. 

The Basilidians were a denomination in the second cen- 
lury, from Basilides, chief of the Egyptian Gnostics. He 
acknowledged the existence of one supreme God, perfect 
in goodness and wisdom, who produced from his own sub- 
stance seven beings, or aions, of a most excellent nature. 
Two of these aions, called Dynamis and Sophiz (i. e., 
power and wisdom), engendered the angels of the highest 
order. These angels formed a heaven for their habitation, 
and brought forth other angelic beings, of a nature some- 
what inferior to their own. Many other generations of 
•angels followed these. New heavens were also created, 
until the number of angelic orders and of their respective 
iieavens, amounted to three hundred and sixty-five, and 
ohus equalled the days of the year. All these are under 
she empire of an omnipotent Lord, whom Basilides called 
Abraxas, 

The inhabitaiLts of the lowest heavens, which touched 
upon the borders of the eternal, malignant, and self-ani- 
mated matter, conceived the design of forming a world 
from that confused mass, and of creating an order of beings 
to people it. This design was carried into execution, and 
was approved by the Supreme God, who, to the animal 
life with which only the inhabitants of this new world were 
at first endowed, added a reasonable soul, giving at the 
same time to the angels the empire over tbem. 

These angelic beings, advanced to the government of the 
world which they had created, fell by degrees from their 
original purity, and soon manifested the fatal marks of 
their depravity and corruption. They not only endeavored 

43 



506 



CHRISTIANS OF ST. JOHN. 



to efface in tlie minds of men tlieir knoTrledge of tlie Su- 
preme Being, that thej might be worshipped in his stead, 
but also began to war against each other, with an ambi- 
tious view to enlarge every one the bounds of his respective 
dominion. The most arrogant and turbulent of all these 
angelic spirits was that which presided over the Jewish 
nation. Hence the Supreme God, beholding with compas- 
sion the miserable state of rational beings, who groaned 
under the contest of these jarring powers, sent from heaven 
his sun JVus, or Christ, the chief of the aions, that, joined 
in a substantial union with the man Jesus, he might restore 
the knowledge of the Supreme God, destroy the empire of 
those angelic natures which presided over the world, and 
particularly that of the arrogant leader of the Jewish 
people. The God of the Jews, alarmed at this, sent forth 
his ministers to seize the man Jesus, and put him to death. • 
They executed his commands ; but their cruelty could not 
extend to Christ, against whom their efforts were vain. 
Those souls, who obey the precepts of the Son of God, 
shall, after the dissolution of their mortal frame, ascend to 
the Father, while their bodies return to the corrupt mass 
of matter whence they were formed. Disobedient spirits, 
on the contrary, shall pass successively into other bodies. 



CHRISTIANS OF ST. JOHN. 

• 

The Christians of St. John, a sect of Christians ver^ 
numerous in Balfara, and the neighboring towns : they for- 
merly inhabited along the river Jordan, where St. John 
baptized, and it was from thence they had their name. 
They hold an anniversary feast of five days, during which 



CHRISlfANS OF ST. THOMAS. 



507 



they all go to the bishop, who baptizes them with the bap- 
tism of St. John. Their baptism is also performed 'm 
rivers, and that only on Sundays ; they have no notion of 
tne third person in the Trinity ; nor have they any canoni- 
cal book, but abundance full of charms, &c. Their bish- 
oprics descend by inheritance as our estates do, though 
they have the ceremony of an election. 



CHRISTIANS OF ST. THOMAS. 

The Christians of St. Thomas were a sort of Christians 
in a peninsula of India on this side the Gulf ; they inhabit 
chiefly at Cranganor, and the neighboring country ; these 
admit of no images, and receive only the cross, to which 
they pay a great veneration. They affirm that the souls 
of the saints do not see God till after the day of judgment; 
they acknowledge but three sacraments, viz., baptism, 
orders, and the eucharist : they make no use of holy oils 
in the administration of baptism, but, after the ceremony, 
anoint the infant with an unction composed of oil and wal- 
nuts, without any benediction. In the eucharist they con- 
secrate with little cakes made of oil and salt, and instead 
of wine, make use of water in which raisins have been 
infused. 

In the Asiatic Eesearches of the Society instituted in 
Bengal, may be found an enlarged account of the Chris- 
tians of St. Thomas, which was laid before that society by 
F. Wrede, Esq. See also Monthly Magazine for 1804, 
p. 60, and Dr. Kerr's Report to Lord Bentinck, on the 
state of the Christians inhabiting the kingdom of Cochin 
and Travancore. 



508 ANTISABBATARIANS. — ATHEISTS. 



ANTISABBATARIANS. 

The Antisabbatarians are a modern religious sect, wbo 
deny the necessity of observing the Sabbath Day. Their 
chief arguments are, 1. That the Jewish Sabbath was only 
of ceremonial, not of moral obligation ; and consequently, 
is abolished by the coming of Christ. 2. That no other 
Sabbath was appointed to be observed by Christ or his 
apostles. 3. That there is not a word of Sabhath-hreaking 
in all the New Testament. 4. That no command was given 
to Adam or Noah to keep any Sabbath. And, 5. That, 
therefore, although Christians are commanded not to for- 
sake the assembling of themselves together," they ought 
not to hold one day more holy than another. 



ATHEISTS. 

An Atheist is one who denies the existence of God : — this 
zs called speculative atheism. Professing to believe in God, 
and yet acting contrary to this belief, is called practical 
atheism. Absurd and irrational as atheism is, it has had 
its votaries and martyrs. In the seventeenth century, 
Spinosa, a foreigner, was its noted defender. Lucilio Va- 
nini, a native of Naples, also publicly taught atheism in 
France ; and being convicted of it at Toulouse, was con- 
demned and executed in 1619. It has been questioned, 
however, whether any man ever seriously adopted such a 
principle. The pretensions to it have been generally 



ATHEISTS. 



509 



founded on pride or affectation. The open avowal of atho 
ism by several of the leading members of the French con- 
vention seems to have been an extraordinary moral phe- 
nomenon. This, nowever, as we have seen, was too vague 
and uncomfortable a principle to last long. Archbishop 
Tillotson justly observes that speculative atheism is unrea- 
sonable upon five accounts. 1. Because it gives no tole- 
rable account of the existence of the world. 2. It does not 
give any reasonable account of the universal consent of 
mankind in this apprehension, that there is a God. 3. It 
requires more evidence for things than they are capable 
of giving. 4. The atheist pretends to know that which no 
man can know. 5. Atheism contradicts itself. Under the 
first of these he thus argues : "I appeal to any man of 
reason whether anything can be more unreasonable than 
obstinately to impute an effect to chance, which carries in 
the very face of it all the arguments and characters of a 
wise design and contrivance. Was ever any considerable 
work, in which there was required a great variety of parts, 
and a regular and orderly disposition of those parts, done 
by chance ? Will chance fit means to ends, and that in 
ten thousand instances, and not fail in any one? How 
often might a man, after he had jumbled a set of letters in 
a bag, fling them out upon the ground before they would 
fall into an exact poem ; yea, or so much as make a good 
discourse in prose ? And may not a little book be as easily 
made by chance as the great volume of the world ? How 
long might a man be in sprinkling colors upon canvas with 
a careless hand, before they would happen to make the 
exact picture of a man ? And is a man easier made by 
chance than his picture ? How long might twenty thousand 
blind men who should be sent out from several remote parts 
of England, wander up and down before they would all 
meet upon S&lisbury plain, and fall into raak and file in 

43* 



510 



ATHEISTS. 



tne exact order of an army? And yet this is mucli moie 
easy to be imagined than how the innumerable blind parts 
of matter should rendezvous themselves into a world. A 
man that sees Henry the Seventh's chapel at Westminster 
might with as good reason maintain (yea, with much better, 
considering the vast difference betwixt that little structure 
and the huge fabric of the world) that it was never con- 
trived or built by any means, but that the stones did by 
chance grow into those curious figures . into which they 
seem to have been cut and graven ; and that upon a time 
(as tales usually begin) the materials of that building, the 
stone, mortar, timber, iron, lead, and glass, happily met 
together, and very fortunately ranged themselves into that 
delicate order in which we see them, now so close com- 
pacted, that it must be a very great chance that parts them 
ao^ain. What would the world think of a man that should 
advance such an opinion as this, and write a book for it? 
If they would do him right, they ought to look upon him 
as^mad ; but yet with a little more reason than any man 
can have to say, that the world was made by chance, or 
that the first men grew up out of the earth as plants do 
now. For, can anything be more ridiculous, and against 
all reason, than to ascribe the production of men to the 
first fruitfulness of the earth, without so much as one in- 
stance and experiment, in any age or history, to counte- 
nance so monstrous a supposition ? The thing is, at first 
sight, so gross and palpable, that no discourse about it can 
make it more apparent. And yet, these shameful beggars 
of principles give this precarious account of the original 
of things ; assume to themselves to be the men of reason, 
the great wits of the world, the only cautious and wary 
persons that hate to be imposed upon, that must have con- 
vincing evidence for everything, and can admit of nothing 
yithout a clear demonstration of it." 



G UEBERS. 



511 



GUEBERS, OR FIRE-WORSHIPPERS. 

GuEBERS, or Guebres, or Gauers (i. e., iniBdels) ; tlie 
fire- worshippers in Persia ; in India called Parsees. They 
call themselves Behendie, or followers of the true faith, 
and live chiefly in the deserts of Caramania, towards the 
Persian gulf, and in the province Yerd Keram. These 
people, who are but little known, are laborious and tempe- 
rate cultivators of the ground. The manners of the Guebera 
are mild. They drink wine, eat all kinds of meat, marry 
but one wife, and live chastely and temperately. Divorce 
and polygamy are prevented by their religion ; but if a 
wife remains barren during the first nine years of marriage, 
the husband may take a second wife. They worship one 
Supreme Being, whom they call the Eternal Spirit, or 
Yerd. The sun, moon, and planets, they believe to bfl 
peopled with rational beings, acknowledge light as the 
primitive cause of the good, darkness as that of evil, and 
worship fire, as it is said, from which they have receiv ed 
their name. But they themselves say, that they do L.ot 
worship fire, but only find in it an image of the incompre- 
hensible God ; on which account they offer up their pra;^ ers 
before a fire, and maintain one uninterruptedly burnmg 
on holy places, which their prophet Zoroaster, they say, 
kindled 4000 years ago. Their holy book is called Zend- 
Avesta. One of the peculiarities of the Guebers is, that 
they do not bury their dead, but expose the bodies upon 
the towers of their temples, to be devoured by birds 
They observe which part the birds first eat, from which 
they judge of the fate of the deceased. 



512 



NESTO HI ANS. 



NESTORIANS, 

A SECT of ancient Christians, still subsisting in some 
parts of Asia, -vrhose distinguisMng tenet is that Mary ie 
not the mother of God. They take their name from Nes- 
torius, Bishop of Constantinople, whose doctrines were 
spread with much zeal through Syria, Egypt, and Persia. 

One of the chief promoters of the Nestorian cause was 
Barsumas, created Bishop of Xisibis, A. D. 435. Such 
was his zeal and success, that the Isestorians, who still re- 
main in Chaldea, Persia, Assyria, and the adjacent coun- 
tries, consider him alone as their parent and founder. By 
him Pherozes, the Persian monarch, was persuaded to ex- 
pel those Christians who adopted the opinions of the 
Greeks, and to admit the Xestorians in their place, putting 
them in possession of the principal seat of ecclesiastical 
authority in Persia, the see of Seleucia, which the patri- 
arch of the Xestorians has always filled, even down to our 
time. Barsumas also erected a school at Xisibis, from 
which proceeded those Nestoriaa doctors who in the fifth 
and sixth centuries spread abroad their tenets through 
Egypt, Syria, Arabia, India, Tartary, and China. 

He differed considerably from Nestorius, holding that 
there are two persons in Jesus Christ, as well as that the 
Virgin was not his mother as God, but only as man. 

The abettors of this doctrine refuse the title Nestorians, 
alleging that it had been handed down from the earliest 
times of the Christian Church. 

In the tenth century, the Nestorians in Chaldea, whence 
they are sometimes called Chaldeans, extended their spirit- 
ual conquests beyond Mount Imaus, and introduced the 



NESTORIANR. 



513 



Christian religion into Tartarj, properly so called, and 
especially into that country called Karit, and bordering 
on the northern part of China. The prince of that coun- 
try, whom the JsTestorians converted to the Christian faith, 
assumed, according to the vulgar tradition, the name of 
John, after his baptism, to which he added the surname 
of Preshyter, from a principle of modesty ; whence it is 
said his successors were each of them called Prester John^ 
until the time of Gengis Khan. But Mosheim observes, 
that the famous Prester John did not begin to reign in 
that part of Asia before the conclusion of the eleventh 
century. The Nestorians formed so considerable a body 
of Christians, that the missionaries of Rome were indus- 
trious in their endeavors to reduce them under the papal 
yoke. Innocent IV. in 1246, and Nicolas IV. in 1278, 
used their utmost efforts for this purpose, but without suc- 
cess. Till the time of Pope Julius III., the Nestorians 
acknowledged but one patriarch, who resided first at Bag- 
dad, and afterwards at Mousul; but a division arising 
among them, in 1551 the patriarchate became divided, at 
least for a time, and a new patriarch was consecrated by 
that Pope, whose successors fixed their residence in the 
city of Ormus, in the mountainous part of Persia, where 
they still continue, distinguished by the name of Simeo7i ; 
and so far down as the last century, these patriarchs pei- 
severed in their communion with the Church of Home, but 
seem at present to have withdrawn themselves from it. 
The great Nestorian pontiffs, who form the opposite party, 
and look with a hostile eye on this little patriarch, have, 
since the year 1559, been distinguished by the general 
denomination of Elias, and reside constantly in the city 
of Mousul. Their spiritual dominion is very extensive, 
takes in a great part of Asia, and comprehends also within 
its circuit the Arabian Nestorians, and also the Christians 

2H 



514 



NESTORIANS. 



of St. Thomas, who dwell along the coast of Malabar. It 
is observed, to the lasting honor of the Nestorians, that of 
all the Christian societies established in the east, they 
have been the most careful and successful in avoiding a 
multitude of superstitious opinions and practices that have 
infected the Greek and Latin Churches. About the mid- 
dle of the seventeenth century, the Romish missionaries 
gained over to their communion a small number of Nesto- 
rians, whom they formed into a congregation or church ; 
the patriarchs or bishops of which reside in the city of 
Amida, or Diarbeker, and all assume the denomination of 
Joseph, Nevertheless, the Nestorians in general persevere 
to our own times in their refusal to enter into the commu- 
nion of the Romish Church, notwithstanding the earnest 
entreaties and alluring offers that have been made by the 
Pope's legate to conquer their inflexible constancy. 

Nestorius, from whom the sect of Nestorian Christians 
derive their name, was born in Germanica, a city of Syria. 
He received his education at Antioch, where he was like- 
wise baptized ; and soon after his baptism, he withdrew 
himself to a monastery in the suburbs of that city. Upon 
his being admitted to the order of priesthood, he quickly 
acquired so great a reputation by the eloquence of his 
preaching, and the regularity of his life, that by the Em- 
peror Theodosius he was deemed a fit person to fill the 
second see in the Christian Church, and was accordingly 
consecrated Bishop of Constantinople, in the year 429. 

In one of his first sermons after his promotion, he pub- 
licly declared his intention to make war upon heretics; 
and with that intolerant spirit which has so often disgraced 
the preachers of the mild religion of Jesus, he called upon 
the emperor to free the ^arth from heretics, promising to 
give him heaven as a reward for his zeal. To this spiritual 
motive he added one that, though carnal, he possibly 



NESTORIANS. 



515 



judged of equal force: "Join with me," said lie, " m "^ar 
against them, and I will assist you against the Persians." 
Although the wiser and better part of his audience were 
amazed to see a man, before he had tasted (as Socrates 
expresses himself ) the water of his city, declare that he 
would persecute all who were not of his opinion ; yet the 
majority of the people approved of this discourse, and 
encouraged him to execute his purpose. Accordingly, five 
days after his consecration, he attempted to demolish the 
church in which the Arians secretly held their assemblies; 
and he succeeded so far in his design, that these people, 
growing desperate, set it on fire themselves, and consumed 
with it some of the neighboring houses. This fire excited 
great commotions in the city, and Nestorius was ever after- 
wards called an incendiary. 

From the Arians he turned his persecution against the 
Novatians, but was stopped in his career by the interposi- 
tion of the emperor. lie then let loose his fury upon 
those Christians of Asia, Lydia, and Caria, who celebrated 
the feast of Easter upon the 14th day of the moon ; and 
for this unimportant deviation from the Catholic practice, 
many of those people were murdered by his agents, both 
at Miletum and at Sardis. One cannot be sorry that such 
{x, relentless persecutor should himself be afterwards con- 
demned as a heretic, for holding an opinion which no man 
who speaks or thinks with philosophic accuracy will now 
venture to controvert. This obnoxious tenet, which pro- 
duced a schism in the Church, and was condemned by a 
general council, was nothing more than that " the Virgin 
Mary cannot with propriety be called the mother of God." 
The people being accustomed to hear this expression, were 
much inflamed against their bishop, imagining that he had 
revived the error of Paulus Samosetenus and Photinus, 
who taught that J esus Christ was a mere man. The monks 
declared openly against him, and, with some of the most 



616 



NfiSTORIANS. 



considerable men in Constantinople, separated themselves 
from his communion. Several bishops wrote to him earnest 
persuasives to acknowledge that Marj was the mother of 
God ; and when he would not comply, they procured hig 
condemnation in the Council of Ephesus, which deprived 
him of his see. He then retired to his ancient monastery 
at Antioch, whence he was taken four years afterwards, 
by the emperor's orders, and banished in 435 to Tarsus. 
That city being taken and destroyed by the barbarians, he 
was removed to Panopolis, a city of Thebais ; where he 
was not suffered to remain long, but was compelled to go 
from place to place, till, being in one of his journeys mor- 
tally bruised by a fall, death relieved him from the fury of 
his persecutors. 

If we examine such of his writings as remain, we shall 
find that he was very unjustly condemned. It appears 
that he rejected the errors of Ebion, Paulus Samosetenus, 
and Photinus ; that he maintained in express terms, that 
the divine Word was united to the human nature in Jesus 
Christ in the most strict and intimate sense possible ; that 
these two natures, in this state of union, make but one 
Christ and one person ; that the properties of the Divine 
and human natures may both be attributed to this person ; 
and that Jesus Christ may be said to have been bcrn of a 
virgin, to have suffered and died ; but he never would ad- 
mit that God could be said to have been born, to have 
suffered, or to have died. When we consider that every 
person partakes of the substance of his mother, and that 
it is this which constitutes the parental and filial relation 
between them, it is indeea surprising that the expression 
*' Mother of God" should ever have been admitted into the 
Christian Church, or that any man who understands the 
meaning of the words should condemn Nestorius for noi 
having used them. 



PAGANS. 



517 



PAGANS. 

Pagans are the worshippers of many gods, the heathen 
who were so called by the Christians, because, when Con- 
stantine and his successors forbade the worship of the 
heathen deities in the cities, its adherents retired to the 
villages {pagi^ hence pagani, countrymen), where they 
<;Ould practise their ceremonies in secresy and safety. In 
the middle ages, this name was given to all who were not 
Jews or Christians, theirs being considered the only true 
religion and divine revelations ; but, in more modern 
times, Mohammedans, who worship the one supreme God 
of the Jews and Christians, are not called pagans. The 
idea of heathenism is of early origin. Moses used every 
precaution to prevent an intercourse between the Hebrews 
and heathen nations, prescribed the renunciation of idola- 
try as a requisite to citizenship in the Hebrew state, and 
forbade any league with the Ammonites, Moabites, &c. 
When the kings relaxed in the observance of these regula- 
tions, the prophets raised their voice against the defection. 
The distinction between pagans and non-pagans, so far as 
claims to a revelation are concerned, is very slight, since 
there are many heathenish people who have traditions of 
revelations made to them. We also find in some religions 
of paganism (for example, with Zoroaster, Plato, and 
Socrates) pure and elevated notions, and precepts of 
morality, which would not disgrace even Christianity, 
Paganism has likewise her moral heroes, as well as Juda- 
ism and Christianity. And although St. Augustine de- 
clared that the virtues of the heathens were but splendid 
vices, yet this assertion is bv no means borne out by facts. 

44 



518 



PAGANS. 



The true point of distinction is therefore to be placed in 
the recognition or denial of one universal, perfect Being, 
that is, in the reception of monotheism or polytheism. 
The apostle Paul speaks (Rom. i. 23) of a law of God 
written on the hearts of the gentiles or pagans, and declares 
that pagans who live by this divine law in their consciences, 
are a law unto themselves ; and that, to every aaan who 
does good, God will render "glory, honor, and peace, to 
the Jew first, but also to the gentile, for there is no respect 
of persons with God.*' (Rom. ii. 10, 15.) Clement of 
Alexandria, and many of the fathers, were of opinion that, 
as God had given prophets to the Jews, so he had raised 
up great men among the heathen, and thus rendered both 
capable of arriving at the enjoyment of divine happiness. 
These views, however, met with strong opposition. Augus- 
tine, although he acknowledged that the virtues of a 
Brutus, Decius, and Regulus, were subjects of admiration, 
and proper models of imitation, yet maintained the prin- 
ciple that all the noble and good actions of the pagans 
were done m the service of the devil, and from vain glory. 
His views obtained such an ascendency, that it came to be 
a generally received opinion that the hope of God's grace 
and eternal happiness depended on a belief in the doctrines 
of the church. Jerome adopted an intermediate principle, 
attributing to the heathens a willingness to receive the 
doctrines of the true church, should they become known 
to them. If this fides impUcita, as it is called, be any- 
thing real, it can only be a desire and endeavor to know 
the truth and to act accordingly. Others have maintained 
the action of divine grace on the souls of heathens, inde- 
pendent of all instruction and knowledge on their part 
The influence which the writings of Augustine exercised at 
the time of the Reformation, and on the Reformers, led to 
the reception of the dogma of the damnation of the pagans, 



PAGANS OF CHINA. 



519 



which acquh'ed a new development from the doctrine of 
predestination. Marmontel's Belisaire was condemned by 
the Sorbonne, because it professed a belief in the salvation 
of the pagans. 



PAGANS OF CHINA. 

The primitive theology of China is supposed, by a num- 
ber of learned men, to agree in its essential parts with the 
doctrine of the chosen people, before Moses, by the com- 
mand of God himself, had consigned the explanation of it 
to the sacred records. The King, or canonical books of 
the Chinese, everywhere inculcate the belief of a Supreme 
Being, the author and preserver of all things ; the princi^ 
pie of everything that exists, and the father^ of all living; 
he is eternal, immovable, and independent; his power 
knows no bounds ; his sight equally comprehends the past, 
present, and the future ; penetrating even into the inmost 
recesses of the heart. Heaven and earth are under his 
government; all events, all revolutions, are the conse- 
quences of his will ; he is pure, holy, and im.partial ; 
wickedness offends his sight ; but he beholds with an eye 
of complaicency the virtuous actions of men. Severe, yet 
just, he punishes vice in a striking manner, even on the 
throne ; and often precipitates from thence the guilty, to 
place upon it the man who walks after his own heart, 
whom he hath raised from obscurity. Good, merciful, and 
full uf pity, he relents on the repentance of the wicked ; 
public calamities, and the irregularities of the seasons, are 
only salutary warnings, which his fatherly goodness gives 
to men to induce them to reform and amend. 

Some historians have also found in the Chinese religion 



520 



PAGANS OF CHINA. 



evident symptoms of the knowledge of the Trinity, as 
believed among Christians. 

The present religion of China is Pagan ; but it is said 
there are almost as many sects as persons among them. 
For as soon as a Chinese expects the least advantage from 
it, he is, without any consideration, to-day of one religion, 
to-morrow of another, or of all together. However, be- 
side the worship of the Grand Lama, there are three prin- 
cipal sects. 

I. The followers of Laokium, who lived five hundred 
years before Christ, and taugiit that God was corporeal. 
They pay divine honors to the philosopher Laokium ; and 
give the same worship, not only to many emperors, who 
have been ranked with the gods, but also to certain spirits 
under the name of Xamte, who preside over every ele- 
ment. Their morality consists in calming the passions, 
and disengaging themselves from everything which tends 
to disquiet the soul ; to live free from care, to forget the 
past, and not be apprehensive for the future. To remove 
the unavoidable fear of death, they pretend Laokium dis- 
covered an elixir, which confers immortality. They call 
this sect that of the Magicians, because the learned of it 
addict themselves to magic, and are believed to have the 
secret of making men immortal. 

II. The most predominant sect is that of Foe, who 
flourished six hundred years before our Saviour, and who 
became a god at the age cf thirty years. This religion 
was transplanted from India to China, sixty-five years after 
the birth of Christ. A large number of altars, temples, 
or pagodas, are reared to this deity, some of which are 
magnificent to the highest degree, and a number of bonzes, 
or priests, consecrated to his service. He is represented 
shining in light, with his hands hid under his robes, to 
show that he does all things invisible. The doctors of 



PAa AK S OF CHINA. 



521 



this sect teacli a double law; the one external^ the other 
internal. According to the external law, they say that all 
the good are recompensed, and the wicted punished, in 
places destined for each. They enjoin all works of mercy; 
and forbid cheating, impurity, wine, lying, and murder, 
and even the taking life from any creature whatever. For 
they believe that the souls of their ancestors transmigrate 
into irrational creatures, either into such as they liked 
best or resembled most in their behavior, for which reason 
they never kill any such animals ; but while they live, feed 
them well, and when they die, bury them with splendor. 
They lay great stress upon acts of charity, and in building 
temples for Foe, monasteries for his priests, and providing 
for their maintenance, as the most effectual means to par- 
take of their prayers, penances, and other meritorious 
actions towards the atonement of their sins, and obtaining 
a happy transmigration. These priests pretend to know 
into what bodies the dead are transmigrated ; and seldom 
fail of representing their case to the surviving friends, as 
miserable or uncomfortable, that they may extort money 
from them to procure the deceased a passage into a better 
state. They also threaten the living with an unhappy 
transmigration, that they may procure money of them to 
obtain a happier one, or leave them to die in dread of the 
fatal change. 

The interior doctrine of this sect, which is kept secret 
from the common people, teaches a pure, unmixed atheism, 
which admits neither rewards nor punishments after death ; 
believes not in a providence, nor the immortality of the 
Boul ; acknowledges no other God but the void, or no- 
thing ; and which makes the supreme happiness of man- 
kind to consist in a total inaction, an entire insensibility^ 
and a perfect quietude. 

Ml. A sect, which acknowledges for its master the phi- 

4i* 



522 



PAGANS OFJAPAN. 



losopher Confucius, who lived five hundred years belore 
our Saviour. This religion, which is professed by the lite- 
rati, and persons of rank in China and Tonquin, consists 
in a deep inward veneration for the God, or King of hea- 
ven, and in the practice of every moral virtue. They 
have neither temples, nor priests, nor any settled form of 
external worship : every one adores the Supreme Being in 
the way he likes best. 

Confucius did not dive into abstruse notions, but con 
fined himself to speak with the deepest regard of the great 
Author of all beings, whom he represents as the most pure 
and perfect essence and fountain of all things ; to inspire 
men with greater fear, veneration, gratitude, and love of 
him ; to assert his divine providence over all his creatures; 
and to represent him as a being of such infinite knowledge, 
that even our most secret thoughts are not hidden from 
him ; and of such boundless goodness and justice, that he 
can let no virtue go unrewarded, or vice unpunished. 

The Chinese honor their dead ancestors ; burn perfumes 
before their images ; bow before their pictures ; and invoke 
them as capable of bestowing upon them all temporal 
blessings. 



PAGANS OF JAPAN. 

The worship of the Japanese is Paganism, divided into 
several sects. 

Among the various sects in this island, the three follow- 
ing are most conspicuous : 

I. The Sinto, or ancient idol worship of the Japanese* 

II. The Budso^ or foreign idol worship, introduced into 



PAGANS OF JAPAN. 



523 



Japan from the empire of China, and the kingdom of 
Siam ; and, 

III. The religion of their philosophers and moralists. 

1. The religion of the Sintos. This denomination have 
Bome obscure and imperfect notions of the immortality of 
the soul, and a future state of bliss and misery ; and yet 
worship only those gods who they believe are peculiarly 
concerned in the government of the world ; for though 
they acknowledge a Supreme Being, whom they believe 
dwells in the highest heaven, and admit of some inferior 
gods, whom they place among the stars ; yet they do nut 
worship and adore them, nor have they any festivals sacred 
to them, thinking that beings so m.uch elevated above man- 
kind will concern themselves but little about human affairs. 
They, however, swear by their superior gods, but they 
worship and invoke those gods alone whom they believe to 
have the sovereign control over this world, its elements, 
productions, and animals ; these, they suppose, will not 
only render them happy here, but by interceding for them 
at the hour of death, may procure them a happy condition 
in the next state of existence, in reward of their good 
conduct in the present state. Hence their dairis, or eccle- 
siastical emperors, being esteemed lineally descended from 
the eldest and most favored sons of these deities, are sup- 
posed the true and living images of their gods, and pos- 
sessed of such an eminent degree of holiness, that none 
of the people dare presume to appear in their presence. 

The Sintos believe that the soul, after quitting the body, 
is removed to the high subcelestial fields, seated just be- 
neath the thirty-three heavens, the dwelling-places of th'eir 
gods ; that those who have led a good life find an imme- 
diate admission, while the souls of the wicked are denied 
entrance, and condemned to wander till they have expi- 
ated their crimes ; but they do not believe in a hell, or a 



524 



PAGANS OF JAPAN. 



place of torment. One of the essential points of their 
religion is, that they ought to preserve an inward purity 
of heart, and to practise or abstain from whatever the 
dictates of reason, or the express command of the civil 
magistrate, direct or forbid. 

The Sintos' religion enjoins abstaining from blood, from 
eating flesh, or being near a dead body ; by which a per- 
son is, for a time, rendered unfit to go to the temples, to 
visit holy places, and to appear in the presence of the 
gods. 

The other great points of their religion are, 1. A dili- 
gent observance of the solemn festivals in honor of their 
gods, which are very numerous. 2. Pilgrimages to the 
holy places at Isje ; that is, to the temple of Tensio-Dai- 
sin, the greatest of all the gods of the Japanese. The 
last essential doctrine of their religion is, that they ought 
to chastise and mortify their bodies ; but few of them pay 
much regard to this precept. 

11. The Budso, or foreign pagan worship introduced 
into J apan, probably owes its origin to Budhe, whom the 
Bramias of India believe to be Vishnu, one of their deities, 
who, they say, made his ninth appearance in the world, 
under the form of a man of that name. 

The most essential points of this religion are, that the 
souls of men and animals are immortal, and both of the 
same substance, differing only according to the bodies in 
which they are placed; and that after the souls of man^ 
kind have hft their bodies, they shall be rewarded or pun- 
ished according to their behavior in this life, by being in- 
troduced to a state of happiness or misery ; that the de- 
grees of both are proportioned to the different degrees of 
virtue and vice. They call their heaven a state of eternal 
pleasure. Their God Armida is the sovereign commander 
of this blissful region ; and is considered as the patron 



PAC/ANS OF JAPAN. 



525 



ar)d protector of human souls, especially of those who ara 
removed to a state of felicity. These maintain that lead- 
ing a virtuous life, and doing nothing contrary to the five 
commandments,* is the only way to become agreeable to 
Armida, and to render themselves worthy of eternal hap- 
piness. 

On the other hand, all the vicious, whether priests or 
laymen, are, after death, sent to a place of misery to be 
tormented for a certain indefinite time, where every one is 
to be punished according to the nature and number of his 
crimes, the number of years he lived upon earth, his sta- 
tion there, and his opportunities for becoming good and 
virtuous. Yet they suppose the miseries of these unhappy 
souls may be greatly alleviated by the virtuous lives of 
their relations and friends ; and still more by the prayers 
and ofi'erings of the priests to their great god Armida, 
who can prevail on the almost inexorable judge to treat 
the imprisoned souls with somewhat less severity than their 
crimes deserve, and to send them speedily again into the 
world. Eor they believe that, when vicious souls have 
expiated their crimes, they are sent back to animate such 
vile animals as resembled them in their former state of 
existence. From the vilest of these transmigrating into 
others and nobler, they at last are sufiered again to enter 
human bodies, and thus have it in their power, either by 
their virtue and piety to obtain an uninterrupted state of 
felicity, or, by a new course of vices, once more to expose 
themselves to all the miseries of confinement in a place of 
*/)rment, succeeded by a new unhappy transmigration. 

There are several sects of the Budso religion, all of 
lyhich have their temples, their convents, and their priests. 

* Those five commandments are, 1. Not to kill anything that has 
life. 2. Not to steal. 3, Not to commit fornication. 4. To avoid 
lieSj and all falsehood. 5. Not to drink strong liquors. 



526 



PAGANS OF JAPAN. 



III. The religion of the philosophers and moralists n 
Terj different from that of the two former, for they pay 
no regard to any of the forms of worship practised in the 
country. The supreme good, say they, consists in the 
pleasure and delight that arises from the steady practice 
of virtue. They maintain that men are obliged to be vir- 
tuous, because nature has endowed them with reason, that 
by living according to its dictates, they might show their 
superiority to the irrational inhabitants of the earth. 
They do not admit of transmigration of souls, but believe 
that there is a universal soul diffused through all nature, 
which animates all things, and which reassumes departed 
souls, as the sea does the rivers. This universal spirit 
they confound with the Supreme Being. These philoso- 
phers not only admit of self-murder, but consider it as a 
heroic and commendable action, when it is the only means 
of avoiding a shameful death, or of escaping from the 
hands of a victorious enemy. 

They conform to the general customs of their country 
in commemorating their deceased parents and relations, by 
placing all sorts of provisions on a table provided for the 
purpose; but they celebrate no other festivals, nor pay 
any respect to the gods of the country. 

There are innumerable temples and idols in this island, 
among which the temples of those who profess the Budso 
religion are the most remarkable, being distinguished for 
their stately height, curious roofs, and numerous orna,' 
ments. One of the temples erected at Miaco is esteemed 
the most sumptuous in the empire. This temple is said tc 
be as large as the church of St. Paul, London ; and con- 
tains many idols, among which is one of gilt copper, of a 
prodigious size, seated in a chair eighty feet broad, and 
seventy feet in height. The festivals of the Japanese are 
irS numerous as their deities. The number of monasteries 



LAM AISTS. 



527 



IS scarcely credible. The raonks are either regulars oi 
seculars. The regulars live in convents, some of whicfi 
contain upwards of a thousand monks. The seculars are 
dispersed abroad, and live in private houses. The former 
aro exceedingly abstemious, but the latter live in luxury 
md idleness 

The Roman Catholic religion once made a considerable 
progress in this country, in consequence of a mission con- 
ducted by the Portuguese and Spanish Jesuits, in 1549, 
amongst whom the famous Saint Francis Xavier was em- 
ployed, but soon relinquished the service. There were 
also some Franciscan friars of Spain engaged at last. At 
first the undertaking proceeded with the most rapid suc- 
cess, but ended in a most tragical manner, owing, it is 
said^ to the misconduct of the Jesuits, and their Cx>nspi- 
racy against the emperor. A persecution commenced of 
forty years' duration, which was terminated by a most 
terrible and bloody massacre, not to be paralleled in his- 
tory. After this the Portuguese, as likewise the Christian 
religion, were totally expelled the country, and the most 
effectual means taken for preventing their return. 



LAMAISTS. 

The name of the Grand Lama is given to the sovereign 
pontiff, or high-priest, of the Thibetian Tartars, who 
resides at Patoli, a vast palace on the mountain near the 
banks of Barampooter, about seven miles from Lahassa. 
The foot of this mountain is inhabited by twenty thousand 
lamas, or priests, who have their separate apartments 
around the mountain ; and, accardi ng to their respective 



528 



L AM AISTS. 



qualities, are placed nearer, or at a greater distance from, 
tlie sovereign pontiff. He is not only worshipped by the 
Thibetians, but also is the great object of adoration for the 
various tribes of heathen Tartars who roam through tBe 
vast tract of continent which stretches from the banks of 
the Wolga to Corea, on the sea of Japan. He is not only 
the sovereign pontiff, the vicegerent of the Deity on earth, 
but the more remote Tartars are said to absolutely regard 
him as the Deity himself, and call him God, the everlasting 
Father of Heaven. They believe him to be immortal, and 
endowed with all knowledge and virtue. Every year they 
come up from different parts to worship, and make rich 
offerings at his shrine. Even the emperor of China, who 
is a Mantchou Tartar, does not fail in acknowledgments to 
him in his religious capacity ; and he actually entertains, 
at a great expense in the palace of Pekin, an inferior 
Lama, deputed as his nuncio from Thibet. The Grand 
Lama, it has been said, is never to be seen but in a secret 
place of his palace, amidst a great number of lamps, sitting 
cross-legged on a cushion, and decked in every part with 
gold and precious stones ; where at a distance the people 
prostrate themselves before him, it not being lawful for 
iny so much as to kiss his feet. He returns not the least 
sign of respect, nor ever speaks even to the greatest 
princes ; but only lays his hand upon their heads, and 
they are fully persuaded they receive from thence a full 
forgiveness of all their sins. 

The Sunniasses, or Indian pilgrims, often visit Thibet 
as a holy place ; and the Lama always entertains a body 
of two or three hundred in his pay. Besides his religious 
influence and authority, the Grand Lama is possessed of 
unlimited power throughout his dominions, which are very 
extensive. The inferior Lamas, who form the most nu- 
merous, as well as the most powerful body in the state. 



L AM AIS rS. 



529 



have the priesthood entirely in their hanis; and besides, 
fill up many monastic orders, which are held in great 
reneration among them. The whole country, like Italy . 
abounds with priests ; and they entirely subsist on the 
grea.t number of rich preserts which are sent them from 
the utmost extent of Tartary, from the empire of the Great 
Mogul, and from almost all parts of the Indies. 

The opinion of those who are reputed the most orthodox 
among the Thibetians is, that when the Grand Lama seems 
to die, either of old age or infirmity, his soul, in fact, only 
quits a crazy habitation to look for another, younger or 
better; and it is discovered again in the body of some 
child by certain tokens, known only to the Lamas or 
priests, in which order he always appears. 

Almost all the nations of the East, excepjt the Moham- 
medans, believe the metempsychosis as the most important 
~ article of their faith ; especially the inhabitants of Thibet 
and Ava, the Peguans, Siamese, the greatest part of the 
Chinese and Japanese, and the Monguls and Kalmucks, 
who changed the religion of Schamanism for the worship 
of the Grand Lama. According to the doctrine of this 
metempsychosis, the soul is always in action, and never at 
rest ; for no sooner does she leave her old habitation than 
she enters a new one. The Dalay being a Divine person, 
can find no better lodging than the body of his successor ; 
or the Fo, residing in the Dalay Lama, which passes to 
his successor ; and this being a god to whom all things 
are known, the Dalay Lama is therefore acquainted with 
everything which happened during his residence in his 
former body. 

This religion is saia to have been of three thousand 
years' standing; and neither time, nor the influence of 
men, has had the power of shaking the authority of the 

45 2 1 



530 



B R AMINS. 



Grand Lama. This theocracy extends as fully to temporal 
as to spiritual concerns. 

Though in the grand sovereignty of the Lanias, the 
temporal power has been occasionally separated from the 
spiritual by slight revolutions, they have always been 
united again after a time ; so that in Thibet the whole 
constitution rests on the imperial pontificate in a manner 
elsewhere unknown. For, as the Thibetians suppose the 
Grand Lama is animated by the god Shaka, or Fo, who 
at the decease of one Lama transmigrates into the next, and 
consecrates him an image of the divinity, the descending 
chain of Lamas is continued down from him in fixed 
degrees of sanctity ; so that a more firmly established 
sacerdotal government, in doctrine, customs, and institu- 
tions, than actually reigns over this country, cannot be 
conceived. The supreme manager of temporal affairs is 
no more than the viceroy of the sovereign priest, who, 
conformably to the dictates of his religion, dwells in divine 
tranquillity in a building that is both temple and palace. 
If some of his votaries, in modern times, have dispensed 
with the adoration of his person, still certain real modifi- 
cations of the Shaka religion are the only faith they profess, 
the only religion they follow. The state of sanctity which 
that religion inculcates, consists in monastic confidence, 
absence of thought, and the perfect repose of nonentity. 



BRAMINS. 

Brama is the name of the first person in the Trmity, 
or Trimurti, of the Hindoos, consisting of Brama^ the 
creator, Vishnu, the preserver or redeemer, and Siva, the 
destroyer. He is represented with four heads and as 



BR AMINS. 



631 



many arms, and the swan is consecrated to him. Hig 
name signifies knowledge of the laws, in allusion to his 
creative power. He is the god of the fates, master of life 
and death, and, by some, has been represented as the 
supreme eternal power ; but he is himself created, and is 
merely the agent of the Eternal One. He is believed to 
die, according to some, annually, or, according to others, 
after a longer period, and to rise again. His character is 
no better than that of the Grecian Jupiter. He is con- 
sidered as the author of the Vedas, and as the lawgiver 
arid teacher of India. The worship of Brama is regarded 
as the oldest religious observance in that country. 

The Bramins are the first of the four castes of the 
Hindoos. They proceeded from the mouth of Brama, 
which is the seat of wisdom. They form the sacred or 
sacerdotal cast, and its members have maintained a more 
absolute and extensive authority than the priests of any 
other nation. Their great prerogative is that of being the 
sole depositories and interpreters of the Yedas or sacred 
books. There are seven subdivisions of the Bramins, 
which derive their origin from seven penitents, personages 
:f high antiquity and remarkable purity, who are said to 
have rebuked the gods themselves for their debaucheries. 
The great body of the Bramins pay equal veneration to 
the three parts of the mysterious trinity, but some attach 
themselves more particularly to one person of the triple 
godhead. Thus the Yishnuites are distinguished by an 
orange-colored dress, and the mark called nama on their 
foreheads. The devotees of Siva wear the lingam, and 
are distinguished from the former by their great abste- 
miousness. A Bramin should pass through four states. 
The first begins at about seven, when the duty of the 
young novice, or Brachmacari, consists in learning to read 
and write, studying the Vedas, and becoming familiar with 



532 



B R A M I N S . 



the privileges of his cast, and all points of corporeal purity 
Thus he is taught his right to ask alms, to be exempted 
from taxes, from capital, and even corporeal punishment. 
Earthen vessels belonging to Bramins, when used by pro- 
fane persons, or for certain purposes, must be broken. 
Leather and skins of animals, and most animals them- 
selves, are impure, and must not be touched by them. 
Flesh and eggs they are not allowed to eat. The Bramia 
is also taught to entertain a horror of the defilement of 
the soul by sin ; and rules for purification by ablution, 
penances, and various ceremonies, are prescribed. The 
second state begins at his marriage, when he is called 
Grihastha. Marriage is necessary to his respectability 
His daily duties become more numerous, and must be more 
strictly performed. Begular ablutions, fasting, and many 
minute observances, become requisite. The Bramins, how- 
ever, engage in secular employments, political, commercial, 
&c. The third state is that of the Vana-Prasthas, or 
inhabitants of the desert, which is now, however, seldom 
reached. They were honored by kings, and respected 
even by the gods. Retiring to the forest, green herbs, 
roots, and fruit were their food ; reading the Vedas, 
bathing morning, noon, and evening, and the practice of 
the most rigorous penances, were prescribed. " Let the 
Vana-Prastha," says Menou, in the Institutes, "slide back- 
wards and forwards on the ground, or stand the whole day 
on tip-toe, or continue rising and sitting down alternately ; 
in the hot season, let him sit exposed to five fires ; in the 
rain, let him stand uncovered ; in the cold season, let him 
wear wet garments ; then, having stored up his holy fires 
in his mind, let him live without external fire, without a 
shelter, wholly silent, and feeding on roots and fruit. 
When he shall have thus become void of fear and sorrow, 
and shaken ofi" his body, he rises to the divine essence-" 



BUDDHISTS. 



533 



The fourth state is that of a Sunnyasi, in which new and 
severer penances are to be performed. Suppressing the 
breath, standing on the head, and other such ceremonies 
are performed, till the devout patient rises to a participa- 
tion of the divine nature. The sanctity and inviolability 
of a Bramin are maintained in the eyes of his countrymen 
by the most severe penalties. The murder of one of the 
order, robbing him, &c., are inexpiable sins ; the killing 
of his cow can only be expiated by a painful penance. 
To some travellers it appears that the number of Bramins 
respectable for knowledge and virtue is very small; that 
the great body of them are devoted to ambition, intrigue, 
and voluptuousness, and that their character is disgraced 
by avarice, meanness, and cruelty. Their charity extends 
only to those of their own caste. The objects of their 
worship, besides their innumerable gods, are almost every 
species of animals, and a variety of malignant demons. 
The transmigration of souls is one of their essential doc- 
trines, and they believe in the existence of a hell. Some 
of the ceremonies of the Braminical worship are horrible ; 
some are more licentious than the orgies of Bacchus. 
The sacrifices commonly consist of vegetables, but animals 
are sometimes sacrificed, and the burning of widows is a 
relic of the horrid practice of offering human victims. 

Harrell computes the number of Bramins in all Asia at 
80,000,000. 



BUDDHISTS. 

Buddha was the founder of the very ancient religion 
called after him. His worship, after the Bramins had put 
a stop to it in India, spread to Japan, Thibet, and China, 
where, as well as in Ceylon, it exists at the present day 

45* 



534 



BODDHISTS. 



Ritter, in Ms VorTiallen Europdiseher Vdlkergeschichten 
(Introduction to the Histories of the European Nations), 
advances the opinion that the Buddhists also migrated to 
the North- West, to the shores of the Black Sea, to Colchis, 
to the modern Mingrelia, and thence to Thrace, where 
they laid the foundation of the civilization of the Pelasgi 
and Hellenes. Even in the doctrine of Asa, in the ex- 
treme north, traces of Buddhism have been thought to 
appear. According to Abel E-emusat, Buddha, whose his- 
torical name was Tshakia-muni, was born under the reign 
of Tshao-Wang, of the dynasty of Tsheu, 1029 B. C, and 
died under the reign of Mou-Wang, 950 B. C. Before his 
death, he intrusted his disciple Mahakaya, a Bramin in 
the kingdom of Makata, which lay in the centre of India, 
with his mysteries. This Mahakaya, who lived under 
Hio-Wang, 950 B. C, is the first saint or patriarch of 
Buddhism, which was left by him to his successor, Ananta. 
The Japan Encyclopedia enumerates thirty-three patri- 
archs, including Mahakaya, in chronological succession, 
each of whom chose his successor, and transmitted to him 
the secret doctrine of Tshakia-muni, who was afterwards 
worshipped as a god, under the name of Buddha. Several 
of them died (or, to use the language of the Buddhists, 
emigrated) voluntarily in the flames. 

Among them, Maming, the successor of Buddha (by the 
Chinese called Phu-sa ; in Sanscrit, Deva-Bodhisatua), 
who gave names to the gods of the second class, was wor 
shipped as his son, born from his mouth, because he per- 
fected the doctrine of Buddha by his own philosophy, 
which is a metaphysical allegorical mysticism. His epoch 
must be fixed, according to the above-mentioned work, in 
332, under the reign of Hian-wang, 618 years after the 
death of Tshakia-muni. 

The twenty-eighth patriarch, Bodhidhorma, was the last 



Br DDHISTS. 



535 



^ho lived in Hindostan. He afterwards fixed his residence 
in China, near the famous mountain Sung. He died 
A. D. 495. The secret of his doctrine was left by him to 
a Chinese, who was the twenty-ninth patriarch. After 
him, the above-mentioned book gives the names of four 
Chinese, who succeeded to the same dignity. The last of 
them died A. D. 713. Their history, like that of many 
other saints, is mixed with fables ; their manner of living 
was the same as what the ancients report to us of the 
Gymnosophists and Samaneans. They devoted themselves 
to religious exercises and constant contemplation, and 
condemned themselves to the most severe abstinence ; nay, 
several of them sealed their belief in the transmigration 
of souls with a voluntary death. 

From that Indian patriarchate originated, A. D, 706, 
the sacerdotal dignity, which is common in China and 
among the Monguls, with the title spiritual prince of the 
law. These priests are, at the same time, a sort of con- 
fessors to the emperors. From this priesthood afterwards 
sprung the hereditary dignity of Grand Lama in Thibet ; 
and, in process of time, the whole hierarchical system, 
when the monastical life of the Buddhists required regular 
superiors, or inferior lamas. 

Besides many other monuments of the ancient worship 
of Buddha, there are two particularly remarkable — the 
ruins of the gigantic temple Boro-Budor, in Java, with 
works of sculpture ; and the five large, subterranean halls, 
called Pantsh-Pandu, probably an old temple of the 
Buddhists, near the city of Bang, on the way from Guzurat 
to Malwa. Tradition ascribes these astonishing works of 
ancient Indian architecture and sculpture, which far sur- 
pass the skill of the modern Hindoos, to the Pamdus, the 
neroes of Indian mythology. 

Harrel computes the number of Buddhists in all Asia at 

^;:.,ooo.^ooo. 



536 



PAGANS IN AFRICA. 



PAGANS IN AFEICA * 

The natives of Africa generally believe in a Supreme 
Being, and have some ideas of a future state. They address 
this being by a fetishe or fetish, which is a sort of charm 
or manner of conducting their worship. The term is often 
applied to whatever represents their divinities. 

The negroes of Congo believe in a good and an evil prin- 
ciple, which are both supposed to reside in the sky. The 
former sends rain, the latter withholds it ; but they do not 
seem to consider either of them as possessing any influence 
over human affairs. After death they all take their place 
in the sky, and enjoy a bappy existence, without any regard 
being paid to their good or bad actions while here below. 

Each town has a grand kissey, or presiding divinity. It 
is the figure of a man, the body stuck with feathers, rags, 
and bits of iron, and resembles nothing so much as one of 
our scarecrows. The chenoo of Gooloo had a kissey so re- 
doubtable that if any person attempted to shoot at it, he 
would fall down dead, and the flint would drop out of the 
musket. This powerful divinity was the figure of a man, 
about two feet high, rudely carved in wood, and covered 
with rags. 

Koiloh is the name of a great spirit, who is supposed to 
reside in the vicinity of Yangroo, in Western Africa, lie 
makes his abode in the woods, and is rarely seen except on 
mournful occasions, such as the death of the king, or some 

* Much valuable information respecting the religion of the tribes 
in the interior of South Africa, will be found in Dr. LivingstonV 
Travels and Explorations in South Africa, published by J. W. Brad 
ley, Philadelphia. 



PAGi NS IN AFRICA. 



537 



of their hea-^ men, or when a person has been buried with- 
out the usual ceremonies of dancing, drinking palm- wine, 
&c., in remembrance of their departed friends. 

The Kolloh is made of bamboo sticks in the form of an 
oval basket, about three feet long, and so deep that it goea 
on to the man's shoulders. It is covered with a piece of 
net, and stuck all around with porcupine quills on the nose. 
It has a frightful appearance, and has a great effect in 
exciting the terror of the inhabitants. 

A certain man pretends to have some very intimate in- 
tercourse with this Beelzebub, and therefore he is called 
by the spirit to take the Kolloh on his head, and to go 
about with it on certain occasions, to see that the various 
ceremonies of the country are strictly observed, and if any 
are absent, he seeks them out and drives them to the place 
of assembly. 

The Kolloh-man carries a stick in his hand, to show his 
authority ; and to give notice of his coming he rings a bell, 
which is fixed inside of the Kolloh, or basket. These Kolloh- 
men are a set of plunderers, who disturb the peace, and 
greatly deceive the ignorant natives. 

The fetishes of Whidah may be divided into three classes : 
the serpent, tall treea, and the sea. The serpent is the 
most celebrated, the others being subordinate to the power 
of this deity. This snake has a large, round head, beauti- 
ful, piercing eyes, a short, pointed tongue, resembling a 
dart : its pace is slow and solemn, except when it seizes on 
its prey, then very rapid ; itB tail sharp and short, its skin 
of an elegant smoothness, adorned with beautiful colors, 
upon a light gray ground ; it is amazingly familiar and 
tame. Rich offerings are made to this deity ; priests and 
priestesses appointed for its service ; it is invoked in ex- 
tremely wet, dry, or barren seasons ; and, in a word, on aU 
the great difficulties and occurrences of life. 



538 



PAGANS IN AFRICA. 



The people of Benin believe in an invisible deity, who 
created heaven and earth, and governs them with abso- 
lute power ; but they conceive it needless to worship him, 
because he is always doing good without their services. 
They also believe in a malignant deity, to whom they sacri- 
fice men and animals, to satiate his thirst of blood, and 
prevent him from doing them mischief. But they have 
innumerable objects of worship, as elephants' teeth, claws, 
bones, dead men's heads, or any trifle that chance throws 
in their way, to which they make a daily offering of a few 
boiled yams, mixed with palm oil. On great occasions they 
sacrifice a cock, treating the divinity with the blood only, 
and reserving the flesh for themselves. Persons of high 
rank give an annual feast to their gods, at which multitudes 
of cattle are offered to the idols, and eaten by the people. 
Each offers his own sacrifices, without giving the priests 
any sort of trouble. 

The religion of the Dahomans, like that of the neighbor- 
ing kingdoms, consists of such a mass of superstition as 
can hardly be described. The objects of their devotion are 
the sun and moon, vai'ious animals and trees, and other • 
substances. The Portuguese word/^j^zco, or, as the English 
pronounce it, fetish^ signifying witchcraft, has been adopted 
by most of the maritime natives of Africa, as well as by 
the Europeans who trade thither. Of their amulets, or 
charms^ the principal is a scrap of parchment, containing 
a sentence of the Koran, which the natives purchase from 
the Moors who visit the country, and which they hang up 
in their apartments, and decorate with a variety of rude 
images. Among the objects of their idolatrous worship is 
a species of snake or serpent, called Dahoa ; they put it in 
a basket, and place it in the temple destined for it, where 
they secretly feed it with rats, but pretend that it lives 
upon air. The temple is served by priestesses, supporte<l 



PAGANS IN AFRICA. 



539 



at tlie king's expense. Every year there is a festival in 
honor of this serpent, at which the grandees assist, and for 
which the king supplies the necessary articles. It lasts 
usually seven days, during which time the people abandon 
themselves to drinking, music, and dancing. Great faith 
is placed in the serpent. Those who labor under bodily 
pains, apply the animal to the part affected, and pregnant 
women offer prayers to ?t for a favorable delivery. The 
tiger is also held in veneration, and there is a temple dedi- 
cated to the devil, or bad demon. Notwithstanding these 
superstitions, the people have a confused idea of a Supreme 
Being, all-powerful and infinite, whom they endeavor to 
propitiate by their fetish ; but pay him no other worship, 
as they are convinced that he is too good to do them any 
evil. 

The Ashantees are, perhaps, the most polished nation 
of negroes to be met with in Western Africa. They are, 
however, gross idolaters, and most lavish of human blood 
in sacrifices at their funerals and festivals. They say that, 
at the beginning of the world, God created three black 
men, and three white, with the same number of women, and 
placed before them a large box, or calabash, and a sealed 
paper. The black men had the privilege of choosing, and 
they took the box expecting it contained everything ; but 
when they opened it, they found only gold, iron, and other 
metals, of which they did not know the use. The white 
men opened the paper, which told them everything. This 
happened in Africa, where God left the black men in the 
bush. The white men he conducted to the water side, 
where he taught them to build a ship, which carried them 
to another country. From hence they returned, after a 
long period, with various merchandise, to trade with the 
black men, who might have been superior people if they 
had chosen, right. The kings and governors are believed 



540, 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. 



to dwell with God after death, enjoying to eternity the 
luxuries and state they possessed on earth: the paraiise 
of the poor affords only a cessation from labor. There are 
two orders of men attached to the inferior deities called 
fetishes. Every family has its domestic fetish, to which 
they offer yams, &c. ; some of them are wooden figures ; 
others are of fanciful forms, and different materials. When 
the Ashantees drink, they spill a little of the liquor on the 
ground, as an offering to the fetish ; and when they rise 
from their chairs or stools, their attendants hastily lay the 
seat on its side, to prevent the devil, or evil spirits, from 
slipping into their master's place. This evil spirit is sup- 
posed to be white; doubtless from the same motives or 
feeling which induces Europeans to say that he is black : 
for, indeed, who would wish to resemble the devil, either 
in color or shape, however some of us may not object to a 
resemblance to him in character ? 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAE.* 

The latest, and, no doubt, the most correct account of 
the superstitious rites and ceremonies of the people of 
Madagascar, is to be found in Ellis's History of Madagas- 
car. From that work, the greater part of the information 
about to be given has been obtained. 

It has long been thought that the people of Madagascar 

* A particular account of the religion of the natives of Madagascar^ 
and of the introduction of Christianity into that island, and the per- 
secutions suffered by the native Christians up to the present time, 
is given in Ellis's "Three Visits to Madagascar/' published by 
J.W.Bradley, Philadelphia 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. 



541 



were a people favorably prepared by circumstances to 
receive Christianity, for they have usually been repre- 
sented as being free from popular idols and religious 
observances, to any extent that would render them averse 
to the influences of a better religion than their own. This 
impression, however, only arose from a want of that know- 
ledge which has latterly been painfully obtained. 

The same feelings and passions which move in the 
breasts of other people, are at work in the hearts of the 
Malagasy, and they, moved by the same hopes and fears, 
and joys and sorrows, that characterize humanity, have, in 
in their destitution of the light of revelation, sought a 
refuge to arm ihem against evil, and to inspire them with 
hope, in a belief of charms. They cannot regard creation 
around them without being convinced of an unseen and 
powerful agency, and being unable to account for effects 
visible to their eyes, and possessing no impression of a 
Buperintending Providence, they consider that charms 
alone could have effected what is above their apprehension. 

But while the Malagasy believe in ody, (charms,) they 
have a conviction of the infallibility of the sikidy, or di- 
vination, by which the charm must be decided, and to this 
must also be added, an undefined belief in some superior, 
though unknown power, whose will the diviner's art is 
about to make known. The art of the diviner is considered 
as certain in its result, though the premises from which 
that result issues are avowedly laid in chances. The 
Mohammedan is not more wedded to the doctrine of fate 
than the Malagasy to their " vintana" — a stern and 
unbending destiny. 

Though Madagascar has no visible objects of worship 
calculated to claim veneration, and charm the senses to 
any great degree, and recognizes no order of priests, yet 
it is not without its idols, its cerem<Mues, its sacrifices, and 

46 



542 



PAGANS CF Madagascar. 



its divinations. It has, toc>, its altars, its vows, and its 
torbidden things, (forbidden because hateful to the sup- 
posed genius of the place,) as well as its mythology, oaths, 
and forms of benediction. No people surpass the Malagasy 
in credulity ; ghosts, witches, apparitions, legendary won* 
ders, and feats of ferocious giants and monsters, have their 
full influence over their minds. The people appeal to a 
superior but unknown power to protect them from sor- 
cery, and to purge the land from the evils of witchcraft, 
the innocent blood is shed of numberless human victims, 
who are persecuted, poisoned, speared, strangled, or hurled 
over a fatal precipice. Being without divine truth, the 
Malagasy cling tenaciously to the superstitions of their 
forefathers. 

Though they speak of God, pray to God, appeal to God, 
and bless in the name of God, yet is the notion they form 
of God so vague, uncertain, and, indeed, contradictory, 
that it can be hardly said with truth that they know any- 
thing of the creator, preserver, and redeemer of mankind. 

Radama, king of Madagascar, was, a few years ago, 
offered the knighthood of the order of St. Patrick, which 
he declined, assigning as his reason that he could not take 
the oath which required him to say that he believed in God, 
meaning the God of the Europeans." There is no doubt 
that the real belief of the Malagasy concerning God, is 
far from being what the terms found in their language 
would seem to imply. 

The terms for God in the native language are Andria 
manitra and Zanahary, or Andria-nanahary, but th< 
notions entertained respecting them are of the most con 
fused kind ; whatever is great, or grand, or new, or extra- 
ordinary, is at once called Andriamanitra. Rice, money, 
thunder and lightning, with earthquakes, and other things, 
are called God. A book is god, a deceased king is god, 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAB 



513 



velvet is son of god, and silk is god in the liiglies: degree. 

It is related of Radama, tliat in a heavy thunder-storm 
which occurred one evening, he amused himself in firing 
off some pieces of cannon. The British agent went to 
him, and inquired his reason for doing so. ' Oh !' said 
the king, *we are answering one another — both of us are 
gods. God above is speaking by his thunder and lightning, 
and I am replying by my powder and cannon.' Mr. Hastife 
pointed out to him the presumption of his conduct, and the * 
king ordered the firing to cease." 

The Malagasy believe that when the body dies, the mind 
becomes "levona," — i.e. vanished, invisible, and that the 
life becomes '^rivotra," — air, or wind, a mere breeze. 
Some of the inhabitants on parts of the coast believe in 
the existence of four superior divinities, or lords, who 
govern the four quarters of the earth — in the interior of 
the country this belief is regarded as a fable. The doc- 
trine of a future state of retribution is not known to the 
Malagasy. No conceptions are entertained of the relation 
existing between the creator and the created, and no moral 
responsibility impressed on the mind. Chicanery, lying, 
and cheating, are considered but very light offences, com- 
pared with trampling on a grave, eating pork in places 
svhere it is forbidden, running after an owl, or wild cat, 
or preparing any kind of enchantment. 

The Malagasy practise the ceremony of circumcision, 
purification, and offering sacrifice ; but they have no tra- 
ditions of the creation, the fall of man, the deluge, the 
favored people of God, or of the Messiah. The doctrine 
of a Mediator, the birth of a Redeemer, the salvation of 
man, the renewal of the heart, the resurrection, the general 
judgment, and the glory to be revealed, are unknown to 
them. 

There are twelve or fifteen principal idols in the vicinltj 



544 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. 



of Tananariva, which excite the religious dread of the 
people, and four of these are regarded as superior to the 
rest. They are supposed to exert more influence in pro- 
tecting and benefiting the sovereign and the country than 
the others, and are therefore national idols. Different 
ilans and districts have their own idols, which are little 
^nown beyond their immediate neighborhood. The idols 
df Imerina have no power among the Sakalavas, nor have 
. the Sakalava gods any influence in Imerina. 

Not only has every clan its own idol, but every house 
and family its ody, or charm ; many wear crocodiles' 
ceeth as receptacles of their ody, and in this they put their 
trust in all circumstances of sickness and peril, in life and 
in death. 

It is not known whether the kings who raised the national 
idols to their present elevation, instituted any public 
worship, for none is now ofi"ered to them ; yet still they 
are called God, and regarded as such. A native Malagasy 
thus describes the idol gods : — The idols are called God, 
prayed to, praised, thanked, highly regarded, honored, 
and lifted up : they are said to be that which causes to 
live, and causes to die, and are supposed to see the future, 
the past, and the present, and to be able to cast down the 
thunderbolts, pour down the hail, to remove the disease, 
and inflict curses, and to assemble the snake tribe against 
all who calumniate them. It is said, also, that their 
calumniators are strangled by them. They are called 
* means of life,' and are kept in boxes." The serpents of 
Madagascar are very numerous ; they are regarded as the 
particular agents of the idols, and on this account are 
looked upon with much apprehension. The national idols 
of Madagascar are kept very secret : to endeavor to see 
them is a crime. No strangers are allowed to approach 
the houses where they ar? preserved, so that the materials 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAK. 545 



of wliicli they are made and the forms given to them can- 
not be described here. When one of them is carried in 
public, its appearance is that of a small image wrapped in 
red cloth. It is elevated on a pole, that it may be borne 
along with greater ease, and at the same time make an 
impression on the awe-struck multitude. Though it is 
carried along in this public manner, the people are forbid- 
den to gaze upon it — an inconsistency that can hardly be 
accounted for. The sovereign gives the red velvet in 
which the idol is enveloped. A Malagasy idol was given 
on a certain occasion, and its appearance was of the most 
extraordinary kind. 

The household gods of Madagascar are of many kinds ; 
anything which strikes the fancy, or allures the eye, will 
do for a god. One man worshipped a piece of silver about 
the size of a walnut, shaped like a bullock ; he called it 
his "bullock of money." An old chief had hung up in 
his dwelling an odd-looking bushy plant ; this was his god. 

The names of the principal idols already alluded to are 
as follows : — 

1. Rakelimalaza. 6. Rafaronatra. 11. Razanaharitsimandry. 

2. Ramahavaly. 7. Ratsimahavaly. 12. Ralehifotsy. 

3. Ramanjakatsiroa. 8. Rabehaza. 13. Ralehimalemalema* 

4. Rafantaka. 9. Ravalolona. 14. Ratsisimba. 

5. Ramanjaibola. 10. Rafohitanana. 15. Ralandreraa. 

Of these fifteen, the two first are by far the most important. 

At a distance of seven miles eastward of Tananariva, is 
situated the village of Ambohimanambola ; this place ig 
the residence of Rakelimalaza. The whole of the hill 
occupied by the village is looked upon as sacred. The 
signification of the name of the idol is " Renowned although 
diminutive." 

There are certain animals and objects which may not be 
admitted within the sacred precincts, and they have the 

46* 2 K 



546 PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. 



qame of Fady. Every idol has its own particular Fady 
Gunpowder, pigs, onions, a shell-fish called sifotra, robes 
that are striped or spotted, goats, horses, cats, owls, with 
fire-arms, and anything of a black color, form, for the 
most part, the Fady of Kakelimalaza. The benefits sup- 
posed to be conferred by this idol are, — rendering the 
sovereign invisible and victorious, defending those who 
cross rivers from crocodiles, protecting true worshippers 
from sorcery, and extinguishing fires. 

Ramahavaly ranks next in importance ; the signification 
of his name is, " Capable of replying :" his residence is at 
Ambohitany, though a house is prepared at the capital for 
his occasional residence. There is a steep hady or fosse 
round the idol-house, and no stranger is allowed to draw 
near to it, lest the power of the charms of the idol should 
sufier injury. The Fady of articles forbidden to approach 
Ramahavaly, are the flesh of animals killed at funerals, 
and other things. This idol most strictly forbids the 
killing of serpents. 

Ramahavaly is considered as the physician of Imerina, 
and is frequently taken from one place to another to arrest 
the progress of disease. A ceremony, called Miafana, 
takes place at the capital, almost every year, wherein a 
guardian of the idol officiates as priest, and sprinkles the 
people assembled as they pass by, in the presence of the 
idol, with honeyed water. While the sprinkUng goes on, the 
priest cries out, ^' Take coui-age, you, your wives and chil- 
dren ! You have Ramahavaly ! take courage for your- 
selves and your property ! He is the preserver of life ; and 
thould diseases invade, he will suddenly arrest them, and 
prevent them coming near to injure you." 

The name of the idol kept at the capital is Raman- 
jakatsiroa, — i,e., There are not two sovereigns," 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. 



547 



" The king is supreme." This idol is, however, considered 
to be inferior to both Rakelimalaza and Ramahavaly. 

The idol called Ranakandriana, on a high mountain at 
Andringitra, is supposed to have imparted the knowledge 
of divination to the Malagasy ; and he is said, also, to reply 
when any one addresses him. It is not an improbable sup- 
position that this belief has been brought about by the echo 
of the place, every sound being reverberated very distinctly 
among the rocks. Some years ago, King E-adama resolved to 
nsit Ranakandriana, to ascertain whether it was really true 
that an answer was given by him to any question proposed. 
No sooner had the monarch entered the dark cavern of the 
idol, and saluted the invisible divinity, than he heard a low 
and solemn voice reply to him. He then presented a small 
donation of money, but immediately seized the hand that 
was gently put forth to receive it. This hand he held fast, 
crying out, " This is no god — this is a human being !" At 
his command the impostor was then dragged forth ; and 
chus the spell was broken, and the disbelief of the king in 
thfe practised superstition confirmed. 

There are many inferior idols, and among them Keli- 
oianjaka-lanitra, "Little, but ruling the heavens;" Ma- 
nara-mody, " The restorer to one's home ;" Rakapila, 
" Half dishevelled ;" Randrano-vola, " The silver water ;" 
Randrano-mena, " The red water ;" Ramandroany, "The 
governor of the past part of the day ;" Rafortribe, and 
others. Ramanandroany is considered potent in punishing 
an unknown thief ; and the owner of the lost property thus 
addresses him : "As to whoever stole our property, Ra- 
manandroany ! kill him by day, destroy him by night, and 
strangle him ! Let there be none among men like him : 
let him not be able to increase in riches — not even a farth- 
ing — but let him pick up his livelihood as a hen pecks rice 



548 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. 



grains : let his eyes be blinded, and his knees oe swollen, 
Ramanandroany !" 

When any one wishes to obtain a favor from an idol, he 
accompanies his request with a present and a vow. The 
keeper of the idol receives the offering in the name of the 
idol, and retains it for his own benefit. Whatever be the 
object of desire, it is stated to the keeper, who repeats it 
to the idol; and if the request be favorably received, a 
wisp of straw is rapidly whirled round by the keeper ; but 
if the straw move not, it is a sign that the idol is not pro- 
pitious. If the request be for a safe return from war, or 
prosperity in any enterprise, or the birth of a child, the 
vow made with the request must be fulfilled as soon as may 
be after the benefit has been obtained. To fulfil the vow 
is to bring the promised offering : this is called Manala- 
voady, the signification of which is, " to fetch away, or 
remove the vow." 

Sacrifices and offerings are not compulsory. Each indi- 
vidual gives what he pleases, according to his riches or 
poverty. In some places the idol has the head, the blood, 
and the fat only, while the carcass is devoured by the sacri- 
ficers and their friends : — this is a very convenient arrange- 
ment for the sacrificers. 

There are many occasions on which the idols are pub- 
licly exhibited, and their antipathies are then proclaimed ; 
the following is one of these proclamations: — ''Practise 
abstinence well ; let each of you take good heed to avoid 
what is prohibited by his idol, whose antipathies are the 
pig ; — let him take heed that it have no access to the vil- 
lages of his abode. The snail, musket, and onions, let them 
not be borne there; and the goat and the horse, suffer them 
not to ascend his villages ; and in the time of thunder (that 
is, summer), the children shall not play at kicking each 
other blue. Ye shall not throw dirt at each other; for these 



PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. 



549 



things are his antipathies, so do not these things, but take 
good heed." 

The processions of the idols are curious. In one of thera 
the first man carries the symbol of the idol on the top of a 
pole twenty feet in height. Round the symbol, and round 
the top of the pole, is wrapped scarlet velvet, which hang 
down like the skirts of a child's doll. The next man bears 
a bullock's horn, filled with honey- water, while in his right 
hand he holds a bunch of twigs, to be used in sprinkling. 
Then come fifty fine young men, each one carrying in his 
left hand a bundle of grass containing a serpent ; his right 
hand is left free, that he may seize the reptile with it when 
he pleases. These young men w^alk two abreast, and 
brandish their arms about continually. When the proces- 
sion arrives at any place considered to be afi'ected with 
sorcery or evil of any kind, it is sprinkled to purify it, and 
preserve it from harm ; and when any fence or bm(ding is 
approached that is repugnant to the idol, a small p^ut of it 
is removed, as a sign that it must be taken down ; with 
this requirement the owner of it is obliged to comp'.y. 

It was once thought that no human victims wers slain, 
but this impression is incorrect. Human sacrific^^ were 
offered in former times in the province of Vangar(^rano. 
An immolation took place every Friday, and chiefn and 
principal men were often slain as a more costly sacri^ce to 
the blood-thirsty Moloch who presided. The victims were 
speared, and devoured by dogs and birds. These sacrr^ces 
were not, strictly speaking, offered directly to the Hoi. 
The victims were slain before an enormous pole, on the top 
of which ody, or charms, were suspended, and the inf an- 
tation and sacrifices were, both together, expected to wirk 
wondrous effects. 

There are two ceremonies connected with the religic^s 
rites of Ankova, called Faditra and Afana. The firsi is 



550 



PAGAN'S OF MADAGASCAR. 



anything chosen by the sikidy for the removal of diseases 
it may be ashes, a sheep, cut money, or a pumpkin. The 
priest reckons upon it all the evils that may be hurtful to 
the person for vrhom it is made, and charges the Faditra 
to take them away forever. If the Faditra be ashes, the 
wind is allowed to blow it away ; if money, it is cast into 
deep water ; if a sheep, it is carried to a great distance on 
the shoulders of a man who runs along, complaining all 
the while of the evils the Faditra is carrying away; and 
if it be a pumpkin, it is carried to a distance, and dashed 
in pieces against the ground. 

The Afana is performed at the grave of a person lately 
buried, and consists of slaughtering cattle and feasting, 
accompanied with firing of muskets or cannon. The skulls 
of the slaughtered cattle are fixed on poles, at the head 
of the tomb. This is done to take evil from the dead, that 
he may repose in peace. The last kind act which can he 
performed for the dead is the ceremony of the Afana. 

The term Yazimba has three significations, but in its 
etrictest sense it designates the aborigines of the interior 
of Madagascar. The graves of the Yazimba are numerous, 
and to violate them in the slightest degree is a very heavy 
crime. So terribly tenacious and revengeful are the ghosts 
of the Yazimba said to be, that an accidental stumble 
against one of their resting-places would bring down a 
terrible doom on the inadvertent offender. 

There are two characters attributed to the Yazimba: 
When a Yazimba grants what is asked of him, he is called 
masina — holy, forgiving, and effective; when he does not 
grant it, and occasions evil, he is called masiaka — fierce 
and implacable. 

To convince the Malagasy of the folly of their fears 
respecting the Yazimba, the missionaries cut off a branch 
from a tree growing near the most popular Yazimba grave, 



PAGANS OJFMADAQASCAR. 



551 



and also carried away one of the stones. This absolutely 
terrified some young men who were present, and they 
doubted not that some terrible accident would avenge the 
impiety, or that the Vazimba would appear to resent the 
affront offered to the tomb. Day after day the missiona- 
ries inquired if the Vazimba had appeared, and the young 
men were convinced that their fears were groundless. 
When, however, the missionaries asked them whether their 
parents were convinced that no danger was to be appre- 
hended, they replied — ■ " No ! our parents say that you 
white people have some strong charms which the Vazimba 
are not able to resist." 

Reports were circulated, after the death of king Radama, 
that he was seen one night in his garden, dressed in one 
of the uniforms buried with him in his silver coffin, and 
riding on o»e of his best horses. Old Andrianamba, one 
of the principal ministers, was immediately sent by the 
queen, attended by many priests, to ask Radama why he 
came again to disturb them. The priests had with them 
the idols and sikidy, and they sacrificed a bullock on the 
occasion. The priests inquired of Radama whether they 
had not buried property enough in his tomb ? and whether 
he did not turn his back upon then* of his own accord, for 
they had not driven him away. It seems that this atten- 
tion, in the opinion of the Malagasy, appeased the ghost 
of the old monarch, and it came again no more. It is not 
known what is the origin of the term sikidy. The word 
means, among the Malagasy, a certain kind of divination, 
to which they are* devotedly attached. It is not astrology, 
nor is it necromancy. It has nothing to do with the flight 
of birds, the inspection of the entrails of slaughtered ani- 
mals, nor the interpretation of dreams. It partakes neither 
of the nature of magic, legerdemain, nor ordinar;^ incanta- 
tion. It is the mode of working a particular prooesa with 



552 



PAGANS OF POLYNESIA. 



peans, straw, rice, or sand. The rules for tliis are fixed 
and invariable, and the result is considered certain. 

Missionary efforts have been successfully made in Mada- 
gascar; schools have been formed, and a Malagasy Bibio 
nas been printed : but since the death of King Radama, 
the queen has prohibited the profession of the Christian 
faith by the natives ; indeed, the profession of Christianity 
and the observance of Christian ordinances are punishable 
with death. At the present time a strong persecution is 
carried on against the native Christians, and the missiona- 
ries have left the island. A young woman named Rassa- 
lama has been cruelly put to death. She was severely 
flogged for several days before her life was taken. Rafa- 
ralahy, a young man, has also been put to death for pro- 
fessing the Christian faith. He died with great firmness 
and constancy. The reported death of Kafaravavy, who 
was accused to the government of possessing the Holy 
Scriptures, and reading them, is not correct. There is now 
but little prospect of the superstitious rites and ceremonies 
of Madagascar being soon exchanged for the Christian 
faith. 



PAGANS OF POLYNESIA. 

Polynesia is a name given by geographers to the great 
body of islands scattered over the Pacific ocean, between 
Australasia and the Philippines, and the American conti- 
nent. It extends from lat. 35^ K to 50° S.; and from 
Ion. 170'' to 230° E. ; an extent of 5000 miles from north 
to south, and 3600 from west to east. It includes, there- 
fore, the Sandwich Islands, the Marquesas, Navigators, 



PAGANS OF POLYNESIA. 



553 



Society, Mulgrave, Friendly, Ladrone, and Pelew Isles, 
the Carolines, Pitcairn's Island, &c. 

A general similarity in respect to the objects of religious 
worship, as well as the forms of idolatrous and superstitious 
practices, obtains throughout the whole of Polynesia ; 
although some difierences may be found between groups 
of islands, and even between islands belonging to the same 
group. 

The supreme deity of Polynesia, who is generally 
regarded as the creator of the world, and the parent of 
gods and men, has different names in different groups. 
By the Tahitians, he is called Taaroa ; by the Hawaiians, 
Tanaroa ; and by the inhabitants of the western isles, 
Tangaroa. According to one of the legends of the Tahi- 
tian mythology, Taaroa was born of Night, or proceeded 
from Chaos, as did his consort Ofeufeumaiterai. Oro, the 
great national idol of Raitea, Tahiti, Eimeo, and some 
other islands, was the son of the foregoing. Oro took a 
goddess to wife, who became the mother of two sons. 
These four male and two female deities constituted their 
divinities of the highest rank. This was the catalogue 
furnished the missionaries by the priests of Tahiti. Other 
gods of high and uncreated order, however, are mentioned, 
as Raa, Tane, &c. . Besides the above, they had numerous 
other inferior deities. 

The image of Taaroa cannot well be described. It may 
le stated, however, in respect to one, which was taken 
from the temple at Rurutu, that it bore some resemblance 
to the human figure. It was about four feet high, and 
twelve or fifteen inches broad, and was carved out of a solid 
piece of close, white, durable wood. On his face and body 
a great number of images were formed, denoting the 
aumber of gods which had proceeded from him ; the imag* 
Fas hollow, and within was found a number of small idols 

47 



554 



PAGANS OF POLYNESIA. 



In the Sandwicli Islands there is a resemblance amono 
all their idols. The head has generally a horrid appear- 
ance, the mouth being large, and usually extended wide, 
exhibiting a row of large teeth, resembling the cogs in the 
wheel of an engine, and adapted to excite terror rathei 
than inspire confidence. Some of these idols are of stone ; 
others are composed of wicker work covered with red 
feathers. 

The Polynesian temples are of three classes — national, 
local, and domestic. In the first are deposited their prin- 
cipal idols, and in and around them are held their great 
festivals ; the second belong to the several districts ; the 
third are appropriated to the worship of their household 
gods. In the South Sea islands the name -of their temples 
was Marae ; these were buildings of a rude construction, 
and resembled oratories more than temples. 

The worship of the Polynesians consists of prayers, 
ofi'erings, and sacrifices. In their prayers, they address 
their gods either in a kneeling posture, cross-legged, or 
crouching. Lil 8 the Pharisees in the days of our Saviour, 
they extend their supplications to a great length, anr! use 
many vain repetitions, thereby hoping to recomnend 
themselves to the special notice of the deity. Their offer- 
ings consist of fowls, fishes, beasts of the field, frmts of 
the earth, and manufactures of various kinds. When 
animals are ofiered, they are generally whole ; but fruits 
are commonly dressed. Portions of the ofi'erings a? e con- 
sidered sacred, and may not be eaten ; the remair-der is 
monopolized by the priests, and other sacred persona, who 
are privileged to eat of the sacrifices. Human fictims 
were formerly ofiered in great numbers, especially in 
seasons of war, at great national festivals, during the ill- 
ness of their rulers, and on the erection of their temple*. 



P4GANS OF POLYNESIA, 



555 



Wben an individual had been selected for sacrifice, tho 
family to which he belonged was said to be tabu, i. e. 
devoted ; and, hence, if another victim was wanted, it was 
likely to be taken from such a family. When the person 
was about to be sacrificed, he was generally murdered at a 
moment when he was little expecting the stroke. As soon 
as dead, his body was placed in a long basket, and carried 
to the temple. Here it was offered, not by burning it, 
but by placing it before the idol. After a variety of cere- 
monies by the priests, among which one was to pluck out 
an eye of the victim, which, being placed on a plantain leaf, 
was handed to the king, who passed it to his mouth, as if 
he would eat it; the Tbody was wrapped in a basket of 
cocoa-nut leaves, and frequently deposited on the branches 
of a neighboring tree. Here having remained a consider- 
able time, during which it became dry and shrivelled, it 
was taken down, and the bones were buried beneath the 
wide pavement of the Marae. 

The religious system of the Samoans differs essentially 
from that which obtained at the Tahitian, Society, and 
other islands. They have neither maraes, nor temples, 
nor altars, nor offerings ; and, consequently, none of the 
barbarous and sanguinary rites observed at the other 
groups. On this acconnt the Samoans were considered 
an impious race. When the people of Rarotongo upbraided 
a person who had neglected the worship of the gods, they 
called bin " a godless Samoan." 

The objects worshipped by them were of three kinds — 
their deified ancestors, their idols, and their etus. Many 
of their ancestors were deified for conferring supposed 
benefits upon mankind. It was believed that the world 
was once in darkness ; but that one of their progenitors, 
by an absurd process, created the sun, moon, and stars. 
For this he was worshipped, until the light of Christianity 



656 



PAGANS OF POLYNESIA. 



dawned upon them. The chief of Aitutaki gave a short 
account of the relics of idolatry. The following selection 
may give the reader a general idea of the whole : — 

An idol named Te-rongo, one of the great deities, called 
a kai-tangata, or man-eater. The priests of this idol were 
supposed to be inspired by the shark. 

Tangaroa, the great national god of Aitutaki, and of 
almost all the adjacent islands. He holds the net with 
which he catches the spirits of men as they fly from their 
bodies, and a spear with which he kills them. 

A rod, with snares at the end, made of the fibres of 
the cocoa-nut husk, with which the priest caught the spirit 
of the god. It was used in cases of pregnancy, when the 
female was ambitious that her child should be a son, and 
become a famous warrior. It was also employed in war 
time to catch the god by the leg, to secure his influence 
on the side of the party performing the ceremony. 

Ruanuu, a chief from Raiatea, who, ages ago, sailed in 
a canoe from that island, and settled at Aitutaki. From 
him a genealogy is traced. He died at Aitutaki, and was 
deified, as Te atua taitai tere, or the conductor of fleets. 
The Raiateans have several interesting traditions connected 
with Ruanuu. To this idol was appended an old tattered 
Bilk handkerchief, and the foot of a wine-glass ; both of 
which were obtained from Captain Cook's vessel, and 
dedicated to Ruanuu, the " god or guide of fleets,*' f .r 
conducting that celebrated navigator to their shores. 

Taau, with his fan, &c., the god of thunder. When the 
thunder pealed, the natives said that this god was flying, 
and producing this sound by the flapping of his wings. 



PAGANS OF LAPLAND. 



557 



PAGANS OF LAPLAND 

From the time that so large a portion of Lapland feL 
fe-nder the dominion of Sweden, repeated attempts were 
r^ade to convert the natives to the Christian faith ; and 
the same object was diligently prosecuted by the Danish 
government. The Laplanders, however, continued to retain 
A strong attachment to their ancient mythology ; and even 
BO late as the middle of the eighteenth century, a great 
part of the. nation secretly worshipped idols while publicly 
professing the Christian religion. 

To these idols were presented various offerings and sacri- 
fices. Upon any change of habitation, libations were made 
of whey or milk, to conciliate the guardian divinity of the 
place ; and of brandy to the Lares or household gods, who 
were supposed to reside under the fire-place. To conci- 
liate the favor of the deities to their children, sacrifices of 
sheep or deer were offered, before the child was born : a 
dog was buried alive at the moment of the birth ; and some 
other animal killed when the infant was at the breast. 
Offerings and sacrifices were usually made for the removal 
of epidemic disorders, for success in hunting, &c. In these 
cases, sometimes the whole of the victim was presented, 
sometimes only a part, sometimes merely the bones, while 
the blood was sprinkled upon staves, which were left on 
the spot, or mingled with the waters of an adjacent river 
or lake. The liver of a bear, the horns and other parts 
of a deer, taken in the chase, were very frequently conse- 
crated to the deity of the place. 

The Laplanders, according to Picart, worship their gods 
under the form of a tree, or block of wood, the top of whicii 

47* 



558 PAGANS OF LAPLAND. 

they form into a rude resemblance of a man's head. 1* 
the head they were wont to drive a large nail, to which was 
fastened a flint stone, that he might make himself a fire when 
ever he found one needful. Sometimes their god was raised 
upon a kind of table, which served in capacity of an altar. 
Their domestic deity, or household god, they represented 
under the form of a large stone, carved in a rude manner, 
and bearing some resemblance to a human face. The sa- 
crifices which were offered to these idols were presented by 
a privileged class of men, named Noaaids, who divided the 
victims with great expertness, and wore at the time of sacri- 
ficing a peculiar habit. 

The Laplanders still retain much of their ancient super 
stitious spirit, even in the Christian rites which they have 
adopted. They particularly regard the sacrament as a 
powerful charm to preserve them from the attempts of evil 
spirits. It is not long since they used to take a cloth with 
them to church, into which they were accustomed to spit 
out the sacramental bread, which they wrapped up with 
great care, and afterwards divided into as great a number 
as possible of small crumbs. One of these crumbs was 
given to every one of their cattle, in the full persuasion 
that the herd would thus be secure from all injury. Their 
very deficient acquaintance with Christianity may, in some 
measure, be ascribed to the very inefficient manner in 
which they are instructed. It has generally been the prac- 
tice of the Missionaries and pastors to address the natives 
by means of an interpreter, and the attempts of the Danish 
government to remedy this defect have hitherto prc^-ed 
UTPuccessfol. 



PAo^ANS OF KORTH AMERICA. 



559 



PAGANS OF NORTH AMERICA. 

The aborigines of New England not only believed in a 
plurality of gods who made and govern the several nations 
of the world, but they made deities of everything they ima 
gined to be great, powerful, beneficial, or hurtful to man- 
kind ; yet they conceived an almighty Being, who dwells in 
the southwest regions of the heavens, to be superior to all 
the rest. This almighty Being they called Kichtan, who 
at first, according to their tradition, made a man and a 
woman out of a stone ; but, upon some dislike, destroyed 
them again, and then made another couple out of a tree, 
from whom descended all the nations of the earth : but how 
they came to be scattered and dispersed into countries so 
remote from one another, they cannot tell. They believed 
their supreme God to be a good being, and paid a sort of 
acknowledgment to him for plenty, victory, and other bene- 
fits. But there is another power, which they call Hoba- 
mocko (i. e., the devil), of whom they stood in greater awe, 
and worshipped merely from a principle of fear. The im- 
mortality of the soul was in some sort universally believed 
among them. When good men die, they said their spirits 
go to Kichtan, where they meet their friends, and enjoy 
all manner of pleasures. When wicked men die, they go 
to Kichtan also; but are commanded to walk away, and to 
wander about in restless discontent and darkness for ever. 

The original inhabitants of Canada, like other heathen, 
had an idea of a supreme Being, whom they considered as 
the creator and governor of the world. It is said that most 
of the nations which speak the Algonquin language, give 
this being the appellation of the .Great Hare, but some caU 



560 PAGANS OP NORTH AMERICA. 

him iMichaboTi, and others Atahocan. They believe that 
he was born upon the waters, together with his whole court, 
who were composed of four-footed animals, like himself; 
that he formed the earth of a grain of sand taken from the 
bottom of the ocean ; and that he created men of the bodies 
of dead animals. Some mention a god of the waters, who 
opposed the designs of the Great Hare, who is called the 
great Tiger. They have a third called Matcomek, whom 
they invoke in the winter season. 

According to the Iroquois, in the third generation there 
came a deluge, in which not a soul was saved ; so that, in 
order to repeople the earth, it was necessary to change 
beasts into men. Besides the first Being, or Great Spirit, 
they hold an infinite number of genii, or inferior spirits, 
both good and evil, who have each their peculiar form of 
worship. They ascribe to these beings a kind of immen- 
sity and omnipresence, and constantly invoke them as the 
guardians of mankind; and they only address themselves 
to the evil genii, to beg of them to do them no hurt. They 
believe in the immortality of the soul, and say that the 
region of their everlasting abode lies so far westward, that 
the souls are several months in arriving at it, and have vast 
difficulties to surmount. The happiness that they hope to 
enjoy is not believed to be the recompense of virtue only, 
but to have been a good hunter, brave in war, &c., are the 
chief merits which entitle them to their paradise : this they 
and other American natives describe as a delightful country, 
blessed with perpetual spring, whose forests abound with 
game, whose rivers swarm with fish, where famine is never 
felt, but uninterrupted plenty shall be enjoyed without labor 
or fatigue. 

The Indians of Virginia gave the names of Ohee, Qui- 
occos, or Kiwasa, to the idol which they worshipped. 
These names might possibly be so many epithets, which 



PAGANS OF NORTH AMERICA. 



561 



they varied according to the several functions they as 
cribed to this deity, or the different notions they might 
form to themselves of it in their religious exercises and 
common discourses. Moreover, they were of opinion that 
this idol is not one sole being, but that there were many 
more of the same nature, besides the tutelary gods. They 
gave the general name of Quioccos to all these genii, or 
beings, so that the name of Kiwasa might be particularly 
applied to the idol in question. 

These savages consecrated chapels and oratories to this 
deity, in which the idol was often represented under a 
variety of shapes. They even kept some of these in the 
most retired part of their houses, to whom they communi- 
cated their affairs, and consulted them upon occasion. In 
this case they made use of them in the quality of tutelary 
gods, from whom they supposed they received blessings on 
their families. - 

The sacerdotal vestment of their . priests was like a 
woman's petticoat plaited, which they put about their necks, 
and tied over their right shoulder ; but they always kept 
one arm out to use it as the occasion required. This cloak 
was made round at the bottom, and descended no lower 
than the middle of the thigh ; it was made of soft, well- 
dressed skins, with the hair outwards. 

These priests shaved, their heads close, the crown ex- 
cepted, where they left only a little tuft, that reached from 
the top of the forehead to the nape of the neck, and even 
on the top of the forehead. They here left a border of 
hair, which, whether it was owing to nature, or the stiff 
ness contracted by the fat and colors with which thej 
daubed themselves, bristled up, and came forward like the 
corner of a square cap. 

The Virginians had a great veneration for their priests; 
and the latter endeavored to procure it by daubing them- 

2 L 



562 PAGANS OF NORTH AMERICA. 

ffelves all over in a very frightful manner ; dressing them 
selves in a very odd habit, and tricking up their hair after 
a very whimsical manner. Everything they said was con- 
Bidered as an oracle, and made a strong impression on the 
minds of the people ; they often withdrew from society, 
and lived in woods or in huts, far removed from any habi- 
tation. They were difficult of access ; and did not give 
themselves any trouble about provisions, because care was 
always taken to set food for them near their habitations 
They were always addressed in cases of great necessity. 
They also acted in the quality of physicians, because of 
the great knowledge they were supposed to have of nature. 
In fine, peace or war was determined by their voice, noi 
was anything of importance undertaken without first con- 
sulting them. 

They had not any stated times nor fixed days on which 
they celebrated their festivals, but they regulated them 
only by the different seasons of the year. As, for instance, 
they celebrated one day on the arrival of their wild birds, 
another upon the return of the hunting season, and for the 
maturity of their fruits ; but the greatest festival of all 
was at harvest time. They then spent several days in 
liverting themselves, and enjoyed most of their amuse- 
ments, such as martial dances and heroic songs. 

After their return from war, or escaping some danger, 
they lighted fires and made merry about them, each having 
his gourd-bottle or his little bell in his hand. Men, women, 
•ind children often danced in a confused manner about 
.hese fires. Their devotions in general consisted only of 
acclamations of joy, mixed with dances and songs ; except 
in seasons of sorrow and affliction, when they were changed 
into bowlings. The priests presided at this solemnity, 
dressed in their sacerdotal ornaments, part of which were 
the gourd-bottle, the petticoat above mentioned, and the 



PAGANS OF MEXICO. 



563 



serpents' or weasels' skins, the tails of which were dextei- 
ously tied upon their heads . like a tiara or triple- crown. 
These priests hegan the song, and always opened the reli- 
gious exercise, to which they often added incantations, part 
of the mysteries of which were comprehended in the songa 
above mentioned. The noise, the gestures, the wry faces, 
in a word, everything, contributed to render these incanta- 
tions terrible. 



PAGANS OF MEXICO 

The deities of the ancient Mexicans are said to have 
exceeded two thousand, who had their respective temples, 
ceremonies, and sacrifices. There was hardly a street 
without its tutelary divinity, nor was there scarcely a dis- 
ease which had not its peculiar altar, to which the Mexicans 
flocked in order to be healed. Their principal deity was 
VitzUputzli, whom they considered the sovereign lord of 
all things, and creator of heaven and earth. The greatest 
god after Vitzliputzli was the Sun, Another of their 
divinities was Tlaloch, whom some writers confound with 
Tescalipuca. But these were considered brothers, of equal 
strength, and so similar in disposition, that the sovereign 
power of war was divided between them. Tescalipuca was, 
however, more appropriately the god of penance, whom 
the Mexicans invoked in seasons of adversity. The Mer- 
zury and Plutus of the Mexicans, the former of whom 
was sometimes called QuitzalcoaU, was represented under 
a human shape, except that it had the head of a bird, with 
a painted paper mitre upon its head, and a scythe in its 
hand. The body of it was covered with jewels of extra- 
ordinary value. Besides the foregoing, the Mexicans 



564 



PAGAN& OF MEXICO. 



worshipped various other deities, among wliom we shall 
mention only Tozi^ a beautiful woman, for whom, at her 
death, Yitzliputzli procured divine honors. Nearly all 
their divinities were clothed with terror, and delighted in 
vengeance. The figures of serpents, of tigers, and of other 
destructive animals, decorated their temples. Fasts, mor- 
tifications, and penances, all rigid, and many of them 
excruciating to an extreme degree, were the means which 
they employed to appease the wrath of the gods. But of 
all offerings, human sacrifices were deemed the most ac- 
ceptable. At the dedication of the great temple at 
Mexico, it is reported there were 60,000 or 70,000 human 
sacrifices. The usual amount of them was about 20,000 

When the bloody sacrifices of the Mexicans took place, 
the victims about to be slain were assembled at a charnaU 
house on a terrace. A priest, holding in his hand an idol 
made of wheat-maize and honey, drew near to these un- 
happy wretches, and presenting it to each of them, cried 
out at the same time, " There is your god !" 

This done, they withdrew, going off on the" other side 
of the terrace, when the victims were immediately brought 
upon it, being the place appointed for the sacrifice. Six 
ministers of the idol here slaughtered these victims ; and 
having torn out their hearts, they threw the bodies down 
the staircase, from the top to the bottom of the terrace. 

They never sacrificed less than forty of these victims at 
a time ; and those nations who either bordered on, or were 
tributary to, the Mexicans, imitated them in this bloody 
worship. 

Another religious ceremony, which indeed does not seem 
so barbarous as the former, was the duel of the victim, if 
we may give this name to the liberty he was allowed of 
defending himself against the priest who was to sacrifice 
him. The captive, Vy^hose feet were tied to a stone, parried 



PAGANS Of MEXICO. 565 

the instrument with which the priest struck at him, and 
even attacked him in his turn. If he had the good fortune 
to conquer the priest, he was released, and considered aa 
a brave man ; but if the priest came off conqueror, he first 
killed him, then stripped off his skin, and had his limbs 
dressed and served up at one of those meals called hy 
them their religious meals. 

The high priest was called Tapizlin in the Mexican Ian 
guage. It is pretended that his dignity was equal to that 
of the pope. He wore on his head a crown of beautiful 
feathers of various colors, with golden pendants, enriched 
with emeralds, at his ears, and a small blue tube, similar 
to that of the god of penance, ran through his lip. He 
was clothed in a scarlet robe, or rather mantle. The 
vestments of their priests were frequently changed accord- 
ing to the different seasons or festivals. 

The priesthood of Yitzliputzli was hereditary, and that 
of the other gods elective. Children were often destined 
from their most tender years to the service of idols, and 
officiated . as clerks, and singing boys, when but mere 
striplings. The priests used to incense four times every 
day the god, whose ministers they were ; but at midnight, 
the principal ministers of the temple rose to perform the 
nocturnal office, viz., to sound a trumpet and horn for a 
considerable time, and to play on certain instruments, 
accompanied with voices, which together celebrated the 
praises of the idol. After this, the priest, whose turn it 
was, took the thurible, saluted the idol, and incensed it, 
himself being clothed in a black mantle. In fine, after 
the incensing was over, they all went together into a 
chapel, where they practised all those rigorous penances 
which have been already described. 

The Mexicans, at the end of every month, which among 
them consisted of twenty days, used to observe a solemn 

48 



566 



PAGANS OF MEXICO. 



day of deT)tion, mixed with rejoicings. They then sacri- 
ficed some captives, and ran up and down the streets 
clothed in the skins of those miserable victims that had 
been just flayed. They danced, they sang, they collected 
alms for the priests, the giving of which among them, aa 
in other places, was looked upon as an effect of real piety. 
The great festival of Yitzliputzli was celebrated in the 
month of May, two days before which, the nuns used t 
make a figure of maize and honey, representing that god. 
Then hstving dressed it in as magnificent a manner as 
possible, they seated it on an azure throne, which was 
supported by a kind of shaft. The nuns, who on that 
festival used to call themselves the sisters of Vitzliputzli, 
carried it in procession on their shoulders, to the area 
before the temple, where the young monks before cited 
receive! the idol, and, after having paid homage to it, 
carried it also on their shoulders to the steps of the 
sanctuary. 

The festival of Tescalipuca was celebrated the nineteenth 
of the same month, when the priests granted the people a 
remission of their sins. At the same time they sacrifice a 
captive, which we may almost consider as an imperfect 
image of the death which our blessed Saviour sufiered for 
the redemption of mankind. 

The Mexicans used to celebrate a jubilee every four 
years, which was nothing more than the feast of penance, 
such as we have already described, except that it was more 
solemn, there being at that time a more general and 
plenary remission of sins. We are assured that the Mexi- 
cans sacrificed many human victims at this season. And 
the youth used to make a kind of challenge, who should 
first, and in one breath, get to the top of the temple. This 
enterprise was a very difficult one, since it gained applause 
to all those who had the glory of coming first to the goal, 



PAGANS OF MEXICO. 



567 



not to mention that they were distinguished from the rest 
of their countrymen, and, moreover, had the privilege of 
carrying off the sacred viands, of which they made the 
same use as Catholics do of relics. 

Forty days before the feast of Quitzalcoalt, the mer- 
chants purchased a slave of a very fine shape, who, during 
that time, represented the deity to whom he was to be 
sacrificed as a victim on the day of the festival ; but they 
first washed him in the lake of the gods, which was the 
name they gave to the water which fitted him for the fatal 
apotheosis which ended with his death. 

Marriage was solemnized by the authority of the priests, 
and a public instrument was drawn up, in which were men- 
tioned the particulars of the wife's fortune, which the hus- 
band was obliged to return in case of separation. After 
their having agreed upon the articles, the couple went t(\ 
the temple, where one of the sacrificing priests examined 
their resolutions by certain precise questions appointed for 
that purpose. He afterwards took up the husband's mantle 
and the woman's veil, and with one of his hands tied them 
together at one corner, to signify the inward tie of the 
wills. They then returned to their house, bound in this 
manner, accompanied by the sacrificing priest. Then they 
went and visited the hearth or fire, which they looked upon 
as the mediator of all disputes between man and wife. 
They used to go seven times round it, successively, the 
sacrificing priest walking before ; after whi^h ceremony 
they both sat down, in order to be equally warmed by the 
heat of the fire, which gave the perfection to marriage. 

Burials and all funeral rites were regulated by their 
priests. They generally buried their dead in their gardens 
or houses, and commonly chose the courtyard for that pur- 
pose ; they sometimes buried them in those places where 
they sacrificed to the idols. In fine, they frequently burned 



568 



PAGANfe OF MEXICO. 



them, after which they buried their ashes in the temples, to- 
gether with their movables, their utensils, and all they 
thought might be useful to them in the next world. They 
used to sing at funerals, and even made feasts on those 
occasions, which custom, how ridiculous soever it may be^ 
some Christian nations have not been able to persuade 
themselves to lay aside. Above all, they buried their great 
lords in a very magnificent manner, and used to carry 
their bodies with great pomp and a numerous train into 
the temples. The priests walked first with their pans of 
copal, singing funeral hymns with a melancholy tone, 
accompanied with the hoarse and mournful sound of flutes. 
They lifted the body several times on high, while they were 
sacrificing those who were appointed to serve the illustrious 
dead. The domestics were put to death to keep their mas 
ters company. It was a testimony of great affection, but 
very common among the lawful wives, to solemnize, by their 
deaths, the funerals of their husbands. They buried a grtat 
quantity of gold and silver with the deceased for the ex- 
pense of his journey, which they imagined was long and 
troublesome. The common people imitated the grandees 
in proportion to their substance. The friends of the de- 
ceased came and made presents to him, and talked to him 
as if he were still living ; the same ceremonies were prac- 
tised whether they burned or buried the dead. We mast 
not omit to state that they carried with them the achieve- 
ments and trophies of the deceased, in case he were a man 
of quality, and that the priest who read the funeral service 
was dressed so as to set forth the glory of the idol vrhom 
the nobleman represented. The funeral lasted ten days. 

The city of Mexico is said to have contained nearly 2000 
small temples, and 360 which were adorned with liteeples. 
The whole empire of Mexico contained about 40,000 tem- 
ples, endowed with very considerable revenues For th^ 



PAGANS OF PERU. 



569 



service in the grand temple of Mexico itself, above 5000 
priests were appointed ; and the number in the whole em- 
pire is said to have amounted to nearly a million. The 
whole priesthood, excepting that of the conquered nations, 
was governed by two high priests, who were also the oracles 
of the kings. Besides the service in the temple, their clergy 
were to instruct the youvh, to compose the calendars, anc^ 
to paint the mythological pictures. The Mexicans had also 
priestesses, but they were not allowed to offer up sacrifices. 
They likewise had monastic orders, especially one, into 
f^hich no person was admitted under sixty years of age. 



PAGANS OF PERU. 

The Peruvians, previously to being governed by their 
Incas, worshipped a great number of gods, or rather genii. 
There was no nation, family, city, street, or even house, 
but had its peculiar gods ; and for this particular reason, 
that they thou'ght none but the god to whom they imme- 
diately devoted themselves was able to assist them in time 
of need. They worshipped herbs, plants, flowers, trees, 
mountains, caves, beasts, adders ; in fine, everything that 
appeared wonderful in their eyes was thought worthy of 
adoration. 

These ancient idolaters :>f Peru offered not only the fruits 
of the earth and animals to these gods, but also their cap- 
tives, like the rest of the Americans. It was their custom 
to sacrifice their own children, whenever there was a scarcity 
of victims. 

Some other idolaters offered their own blood to their 
deities, which they drew from their arms and thighs, accord- 

48* 



570 



PAGANS OF PERlj. 



ing as the sacrifice was more or less solemn ; and they even 
used, on extraordinary occasions, to bleed themselves at 
the tips of their nostrils, or between the eyebrows. 

Such was the state of idolatry all over Peru, when the 
Inca Maneocapac, the lawgiver of that vast empire, taught 
the savages the worship of the Sun. From this time, sacri- 
fices of various kinds of animals were off'ered in honor of 
the sun, and also cocoa, corn, rich clothes, and a liquor 
made of water and maize. They always presented the last 
offering to the sun in the following manner : When they 
were very thirsty, the first satisfied their hunger, and after- 
wards dipped the tip of their finger in the vessel into which 
the liquor was poured ; this being done, they lifted up their 
eyes to heaven in a very submissive manner ; shook that 
finger on which the drop hung, and offered it to the sun as 
an acknowledgment for his goodness in providing drink 
for them. At the same time they gave two or three kisses 
to the air. This oblation being made, they all drank as 
they thought proper. 

Every time they entered their temples, the chief man in 
the company laid his hand on one of his eyebrows, and 
whether he tore off ony of the hairs or not, he blew it into 
the air before the idol, as a mark of its being an oblation. 
They paid the same adoration to trees, and to all those things 
which a divine virtue had made sacred and religious. 



KOMAN CATHOLICS. 



571 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 

Although, in ordinary language, the name Roman 
Jatholic Church is often used to designate the ruling au- 
thority or power in the Catholic religion, as if distinct from 
the members of that communion, yet the definition which 
Catholics give of the Church is such as to comprehend the 
entire body of its members as well as its rulers, the flock 
as much as the shepherds. Thus we hear of Catholics 
being under the dominion of their Church, or obliged to 
obey it, as though it were something distinct from them- 
selves, or as if they were not a part of their Church. This 
preliminary remark is made to explain a certain vagueness 
of expression, which often leads to misapprehension, and 
serves as the basis of incorrect ideas regarding the pecu- 
liar doctrines of that Church — a vagueness similar to what 
is frequent in writing and speaking on jurisprudence ; as, 
for example, where the government of a country is consi- 
dered as a power distinct and almost at variance with the 
nation which it rules, and not an integral part thereof. 

The Catholic Church, therefore, is defined to be the 
community of the faithful united to their lawful pastors, 
in communion with the see of Rome or with the Pope, the 
successor of St. Peter, and vicar of Christ on earth. 

Simply developing the terms of this definition, we will 
give a brief sketch of the constitution or fundamental sys- 
tem of this Church, under the heads of its government, 
its laws, and its vital or constitutive principle. 

I. The government of the Catholic Church may be con- 
sidered monarchical, inasmuch as the Pope is held in it to 
be the ruler over the entire Church, and the most distant 



57^ 



-ROMAN CATHOLICS 



bishop of the Catholic Church holds his appointment from 
him, and receives from him his authority. No bishop can 
he considered lawfully consecrated without his approbation. 
The dignity or office of Pope is inherent in the occupant 
of the see of Rome, because the supremacy over the Church 
is believed to be held in virtue of a commission given to 
St. Peter, not as his own personal prerogative, but as a part 
of the constitution of the Church, for its advantage, and 
therefore intended to descend to his successors — as the 
episcopal power did from the apostles to those who suc- 
ceeded them in their respective sees. 

The election of the Pope, therefore, devolves upon the 
clergy of Rome, as being their bishop ; and it is confided 
to the college of cardinals, who, bearing the titles of the 
eldest churches in that city, represent its clergy, and form 
their chapter or electoral body. The meeting or chapter 
formed for this purpose alone is called a conclave. The 
cardinals are in their turn appointed by the Pope, and 
compose the executive council of the Church. They pre- 
side over the various departments of ecclesiastical govern- 
ment, and are divided into boards or congregations, as 
they are called, for the transaction of business from all 
parts of the world ; but every decision is subject to the 
Pope's revision, and has no value except from his appro- 
bation. 

On some occasions they are all summoned together to 
meet the Pope on affairs of higher importance, as for the 
nomination of bishops, or the admission of new members 
into their body; and then the assembly is called a consis- 
lory. The full number of cardinals is seventy-two, but 
there are always some hats left vacant. 

The Catholic Church being essentially episcopal, is go- 
verned by bishops, who are of two sorts, bishops in ordi- 
nary, and vicars apostolic. By the first are meant titular 



ROiMAN CATHOLICS. 



573 



bishops, or such as bear the name of the see over which 
thej rule ; as the Archbishop of Paris, or of Dublin ; the 
Bishop of Cambray or New Orleans. The manner of ap- 
pointing such bishops varies considerably. Where they 
are unshackled by the government, the clergy of the dio- 
cese meet in chapter, according to old forms, and having 
selected three names, forward them to the Holy See, where 
one is chosen for promotion. This is the case in Ireland, 
Belgium, and perhaps in the free states of America. In 
most countries, however, the election of bishops ia regu- 
lated by concordat; that is, a special agreement between 
the Pope and the civil government. The presentation is 
generally vested in the crown ; but the appointment must 
necessarily emanate from the Pope. 

The powers of bishops, and the manner of exercising 
their authority, are regulated by the canon law; their 
jurisdiction on every point is clear and definite, and leaves 
no room for arbitrary enactments or oppressive measures. 
Yet it is of such a character as, generally considered, can 
perfectly control the inferior orders of clergy, and secure 
them to the discharge of their duty. In most Catholic 
countries there is a certain degree of civil jurisdiction al- 
lowed to the bishops, with judicial powers, in matters of a 
mixed character ; as in cases appertaining to marriages, 
where a distinction between civil and ecclesiastical mar- 
riage has not been drawn by the legislature. Some of- 
fences connected with religion, as blasphemy or domestic 
immorality, are likewise brought under their cognizance. 

Where the succession of the Catholic hierarchy has been 
interrupted, as in England, or never been established, as 
in Australasia or some parts of India, the bishops who 
superintend the Catholic Church, and represent the papal 
authority, are known by the name of vicars apostolic, A 
vicar apostolic is not necessarily a bishop — an instance oi" 



574 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



which we have now at Calcutta, where the vicar apostolic 
is a simple priest. Generally, however, he receives epis- 
copal consecration ; and as, from local circumstances, it is 
not thought expedient that he should bear the title of the 
see which he administers, he is appointed with the title of 
an ancient bishopric now in the hands of infidels, and thus 
is called a bishop in partibus infidelium, though the last 
word is often omitted in ordinary language. A vicar apos- 
tolic, being generally situated where the provisions of the 
canon law cannot be fully observed, is guided by particular 
instructions, by precedents and consuetude, to all which 
the uniformity of discipline through the Catholic Church 
gives stability and security. Thus the vicars apostolic, 
who rule over the four episcopal districts of England, have 
their code in the admirable constitution of Pope Benedict 
Xiy., beginning with the words Apostolioum ministerium. 
The powers of a vicar apostolic are necessarily more ex- 
tended than those of ordinary bishops, and are ampler in 
proportion to the difficulty of keeping up a close commu 
nication with Rome. Thus, many cases of dispensation in 
marriage which a continental bishop must send to the 
Holy See, may be provided for by an English or American 
vicar apostolic ; and other similar matters, for which these 
must consult it, could at once be granted by the ecclesi- 
astical superiors of the Mauritius or of China. The nomi- 
nation of vicars apostolic is solely with the Pope. 

The inferior clergy, considered in reference to the gov- 
ernment of the Church, consists mainly of the parochial 
clergy, or those who supply their place. In all countries 
possessing a hierarchy, the country is divided into parishes, 
^ach provided with a parochus or curate,"^ corresponding 

* To avoid mistakes, we may observe that the parish priest in Ire- 
'and corresponds to the cur6 in France the curato (or in the coun- 



ROMAN CATHOLICS 



575 



to the rector or vicar of the English Established Cburch. 
The appointment to a parish is vested in the bishop, who 
has no power to remove again at will, or for any cause 
except a canonical offence juridically proved. The vi^ht of 
presentation by lay patrons is, however, in particular in--fctances, 
fully respected. In Italy the parish priests are gnner&lly 
chosen by competition ; as, upon a vacancy, a daj is ap- 
pointed on which the testimonials of the different candidates 
are compared, and they themselves personally examined be- 
fore the bishop in theology, the exposition of Scriptare, and 
extemporaneous- preaching ; and whoever is pronounced, hy 
ballot, superior to the rest, is chosen. 

Under an apostolic vicariate, the clergy corresponding to 
the parochial clergy generally bear the title of apostolic mis^ 
sionaries, and have missions or local districts, with variable 
* limits, placed under their care ; but are dependent upon the 
will of their ecclesiastical superiors. 

Besides the parochial clergy, there is a considerable 
body of ecclesiastics, who do not enter directly into the 
governing part of the Church, although they help to dis- 
charge some of its most important functions. A great 
number of secular clergy are devoted to the conduct of 
education, either in universities or seminaries ; many oc- 
cupy themselves exclusively with the pulpit, others with 
instructing the poor, or attending charitable institutions. 
A certain number also fill prebends, or attend to the daily 
service of cathedrals, etc. ; for in the Catholic Church, 
pluralities, where the cure of souls exists, are strictly pro- 
hibited, and consequently a distinct body of clergy from 
those engaged in parochial duties, or holding rectories, 
etc., is necessary for those duties. Besides -this auxiliary 



try, arciprete) of Italy, and the cura of Spain. The curate in Ire- 
land, as in the churcli of England, is equivalent to the vicalre of 
France and the sotto-curato of Italy. 



576 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



Force, the regular clergy, or monastic orders, take upon 
them many of these functions. The clergy of the Catho- 
lic Church in the west are bound by a vow of celibacy, not 
formally made, but implied in their ordination as sub-dea- 
cons. This obligation of celibacy is only reckoned among 
the disciplinary enactments of the Church. The clergy 
of that portion of the Greek and Armenian church which 
is united in communion with the see of Rome, may be mar- 
ried ; that is, may receive orders if married, but are not 
allowed to marry after having taken orders. A similar 
discipline, if thought expedient by the Church, might be 
introduced into the west. 

The only point concerning the government of the Catho- 
lic; Church which remains to be mentioned is the manner 
in which it is exercised. The most solemn tribunal is a 
general council^ that is, an assembly of all the bishops of 
tiie Church, who may attend either in person or by deputy, 
under the presidency of the Pope or his legates. When 
once a decree has passed such an assembly, and received 
the approbation of the Holy See, there is no further appeal. 
Distinction must be, however, made between doctrinal and 
diseiplijxary decrees ; for example, when in the council of 
Trent it was decreed to be the doctrin^ of the Church, that 
marriage is indissoluble, this decree is considered binding 
in the belief and on the conduct, nor can its acceptance be 
refused by any one without his being considered rebellious 
to the Church. But when it is ordered that marriages 
must be celebrated only in presence of the parish priest, 
this is a matter of discipline, not supposed to rest on the 
revelation of God, but dictated by prudence ; and conse- 
quently a degree of toleration is allowed regarding the 
adoption of the resoluljlon in particular dioceses. It is 
only wi';h regard to such decrees, and more specifically the 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



677 



one we have mentioned, that the council of Trent is sm ] 
to have been received, or not, in different countries. 

When a general council cannot be summoned, or when 
it is not deemed necessary, the general government of the 
Church is conducted by the Pope, whose decisions in mat- 
ters of discipline are considered paramount, though par- 
ticular sees and countries claim certain special privileges 
and exemptions. In matters of faith it is admitted that 
if he issue a decree, as it is called, ex cathedrd, or as head 
of the Church, and all the bishops accept it, such definition 
or decree is binding and final.* 

The discipline or reformation of smaller divisions is per- 
formed by provincial or diocesan synods. The first consist 
of the bishops of a province under their metropolitan ; the 
latter of the parochial and other clergy under the superin 
tendence of the bishop. The forms to be observed in such 
assemblies, the subjects which may be discussed, and the 
extent of jurisdiction which may be assumed, are laid down 
at full in a beautiful work of the learned Benedict XIV c, 
entitled "De Synodo Diocesana." The acts and decrees 
of many such partial synods have been published, and are 
held in high esteem among Catholics ; indeed, they may 
be recommended as beautiful specimens of deliberative 
wisdom. Such are the decrees of the various synods held 
at Milan under the virtuous and amiable St. Charles Bor- 
romeo. 

II. The laws of the Catholic Church may be divided into 
two classes, those which bind the interior, and those which 

* The great difference between the Transalpine and Cisalpine 
divines, as they are termed, is whether such a decree has its forc« 
prior to, or independent of, the accession of the body of bishops tQ 
it, or receives its sanction and binding power from their acceptance. 
Practically there is little or no difference between the two opinions,' 
yet this slight variety forms a principal groundwork of what are 
called the liberties of the Gallican church. 
49 2 M 



578 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



regulate outward conduct. This distinction, which corre- 
sponds to that above made, l^etween doctrinal and discipli- 
nary decrees, may appear unnsnal, as the term laws seems 
nardly applicable to forms of thought or belief. Still, view- 
mg, as we have done, the Catholic Church under the form 
of an organised religious society, and considering that it 
professes to be divinely authorized to exact interior assent 
to all that it teaches, under the penalty of being separated 
from its communion, we think we can well classify under 
the word law those principles and doctrines which it com- 
mands and expects all its members to profess. 

Catholics often complain that doctrines are laid to their 
charge which they do not hold, and in their various publi- 
cations protest against their belief being assumed upon any 
but authoritative documents ; and as Such works are per- 
fectly accessible, the complaint must appear reasonable as 
well as just. There are several works in which an accurate 
account is given of what Catholics are expected to beKeve, 
and which carefully distinguish between those points on 
which latitude of opinion is allowed, and such as haye 
been fully and decisively decreed by the supreme authority 
of the Church. Such are Yeron's ''Eegula Fidei," or 
Rule of Faith, a work lately translated into English, and 
Holden's ''Analysis FideL" But there are documents of 
more authority thf^n these ; for example, the Declaration" 
set forth by the vicars apostolic or bishops in England, in 
1823, often republished ; and still more the " Catechismua 
ad Parochos," or Catechism of the Council of Trent, 
translated ir.to English not many years ago, and published 
in Dublin. A perusal of such works as these will satisfy 
those who are desirous of full and accurate information 
regarding Catholic tenets, of their real nature, and show 
that the popular expositions of their substance and char- 
acter are generally incorrect. 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



579 



TK-S formulary of faith, which persons becoming mem- 
bers of the Catholic Church are expected to recite, and 
which is sworn to upon taking any degree, or being ap- 
pointed to a chair in a university, is the creed of Pius 
[V., of which the following is the substance : 

The preamble runs as follows: "I, N., with a firm 
faith believe and profess all and every one of those things 
which are contained in that creed, which the holy Roman 
Church maketh use of." Then follows the Nicene creed. 

" I most steadfastly admit and embrace apostolical and 
ecclesiastical traditions, and all other observances and con- 
stitutions of the same Church. 

I also admit the Holy Scriptures, according to that . 
sense which our holy mother the Church has held and does 
hold, to which it belongs to judge of the true sense and 
interpretation of the Scriptures ; neither will I ever take 
and interpret them otherwise than according to the unani- 
mous consent of the fathers. 

*' I also profess that there are truly and properly seven 
sacraments of the new law, instituted by Jesus Christ our 
Lord, and necessary for the salvation of mankind, though 
not all for every one, to wit : baptism, confirmation, the 
eucharist, penance,* extreme unction, holy orders, f and 
matrimony ; and that they confer grace ; and that of these, 
baptism, confirmation, and orders cannot^be reiterated with- 

* Under penance is included confession ; as the Catholic sacra- 
ment of penance consists of three parts: contrition or sorrow, con- 
fession, and satisfaction. 

f The clerical orders of the Catholic Church are divided into two 
classes, sacred and minor orders. The first consists of subdeacons, 
deacons, and priests, who are bound to celibacy and the daily reci- 
tation of the Breviary^ or collection of psalms and prayers, occupy- 
ing a considerable time. The minor orders are four in number, and 
are preceded by the tonsure, an ecclesiastical ceremony in which the 
hair is shorn, initiatory to the ecclesiastical state. 



580 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



out sacrilege. I also receive and admit the received and 
approved ceremonies of the Catholic Church, used in tho 
solemn administration of the aforesaid sacraments. 

" I embrace and receive all and every one of the things 
which have been defined and declared in the holy Council 
of Trent, concerning original sin and justification. 

" I profess likewise that in the mass there is ofiered to 
God a true, proper, and propitiatory sacrifice for the liv- 
ing and the dead ; and that in the most holy sacrament of 
the eucharist there is truly, really, and substantially, the 
body and blood, together with the soul and divinity, of our 
Lord Jesus Christ ; and that there is made a change of the 
whole substance of the bread into the body, and of the 
whole substance of the wine into the blood, which change 
the Catholic Church calls transuhstantiation. I also con- 
fers that under either kind alone Christ is received whole 
and entire, and a true sacrament. 

" I firmly hold that there is a 'purgatory^ and that the 
souls therein detained are helped by the sufirages of the 
faithful. 

" Likewise, that the saints reigning with Christ are to 
be honored and invocated, and that they offer up prayers 
to God for us ; and that their relics are to be had in vene- 
ration. 

" I most firmly assert that the images of Christ, of the 
mother of God, and also of other saints, ought to be had 
and retained, and that due honor and veneration are to be 
given them. 

" I also affirm that the power of indulgences was left by 
Christ in the Church, and that the use of them is most 
wholesome to Christian people. 

" I acknowledge the holy Catholic Apostolic llomQji 
Church for the mother and mistress of all churches ; and 
I promise true obedience to the Bishop of Rome, sacces^jr 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



581 



to St. Peter, prince of the apostles, and vicar of Jesus 
Christ." 

Then follow clauses condemnatory of all contrary doc- 
trines, and expressive of adhesion to all the definitions of 
the Council of Trent. 

It is obvious that this form of confession was framed in 
accordance to the decrees of that council, and consequently 
has chiefly in view the opinions of those who followed the 
Reformation. It would be foreign to our purpose to enter 
into any explanations of the doctrines here laid down, 
much less into any statement of the grounds on which 
Catholics hold them, as we purposely refrain from all po- 
lemical discussion. 

Such is the doctrinal code of the Catholic Church ; of 
its moral doctrines we need not say anything, because no 
authorized document could be well referred to that embo 
dies them all. There are many decrees of Popes condem- 
natory of immoral opinions or propositions, but no positive 
decrees. Suffice it to say, that the moral law, as taught 
in the Catholic Church, is mainly the same as other deno- 
minations of Christians profess to follow. 

Of the disciplinary or governing code we have already 
spoken, when we observed that it consisted of the Canon 
Law, which, unlike the doctrinal and moral code, may 
vary with time, place, and accidental circumstances. 

III. Our last head was the essential or constitutive 
principle of the Catholic Church. By this we mean that 
principle which gives it individuality, distinguishes it from 
other religions, pervades all its institutions, and gives the 
answer to every query regarding the peculiar constitution 
outward and inward of this Church. 

Now, the fundamental position, the constitutive princi- 
ple of the Catholic Church, is the doctrine and belief tliat 
God has promised, and consequently bestows upon it, a 

49* 



582 



^OMAN CATHOLICS. 



constant and perpetual protection, to tlie extent of guar- 
anteeing it from destruction, from error, or fatal corrup- 
tion. Tkis principle once admitted, everything else fol- 
lows. 1. The infallibility of the Church in its decisions on 
matters concerning faith. 2. The obligation of submitting 
to all these decisions, independently of men's own private 
judgments or opinions. 3. The authority of tradition, or 
the unalterable character of all the doctrines committed to 
the Church ; and hence the persuasion that those of its 
dogmas which to others appear strange and unscriptural, 
hav3 been in reality handed down, uncorrupted, since the 
time of the apostles, who received them from Christ's 
teaching. 4. The necessity of religious unity, by perfect 
uniformity of belief ; and thence, as a corollary, the sin 
fulness of wilful separation or schism, and culpable errors 
or heresy. 5. Government by authority, since they who 
are aided and supported by such a promise must neeossa- 
vilj be considered appointed to direct others, and are held 
as the representatives and vicegerents of Christ in the 
Church. 6. The papal supremacy, whether considered as 
a necessary provision for the preservation of this essential 
unity, or as the priiioipal depository of the divine pro- 
mises. 7. In fine, the authority of councils, the right to 
enact canons and ceremonies, the duty of repressing all 
attempts to broach new opinions ; in a word, all that sys- 
tem of rule and authoritative teaching which must strike 
every one as the leading feature in the constitution of the 
Catholic Church. 

The differences, therefore, between this and other reli- 
gions, however complicated and numerous they may at 
first sight appear, are thus in truth narrowed to one ques- 
tion ; for particular doctrines must share the fate of the 
dogmas above cited, as forming the constitutive principle 
of the Catholic religion. This religion claims for itself & 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



683 



complete consistency from its first principle to its last con- 
gequence, and to its least institution, and finds fault with 
others, as though they preserved forms, dignities, and doc- 
trines which must have sprung from a principle by ihem 
rejected, but which are useless and mistaken, the momens 
they are disjoined from it. Be this as it may, the consti- 
tution of the Catholic Church should seem to possess what 
is essential to every moral organized body — a principle of 
vitality which accounts for all its actions, and determines 
at once the direction and the intensity of all its functions. 

To conclude our account of the Catholic Church, we 
"will give a slight view of the extent of its dominions, by 
enumerating the countries which profess its doctrines, or 
which contain considerable communities under its obedi- 
ence. In Europe, Italy, Spain, Portugal, France, Bel- 
gium, the Austrian empire, including Hungary, Bavaria, 
Poland, and the Rhenish provinces of Prussia, which for- 
merly belonged to the ecclesiastical electorates, profess the 
Catholic religion as that of the state, or, according to the 
expression of the French chart that of the majority of 
the people. In America, all the countries which once 
formed part of the Spanish dominions, both in the south- 
ern and northern portion of the continent, and which are 
now independent states, profess exclusively the same reli- 
gion. The empire of Brazil is also Catholic. Lower 
Canada, and all those islands in the West Indies which 
belong to Spain or France, including the Republic of 
Hayti, profess the Oatholic faith ; and there are also con- 
Biderable Catholic communities in the United States of 
North America. Many Indian tribes, in the Canadas, in 
the United States, and in South America, have embraced 
the same faith. In Asia there is hardly any nation pro 
fessing Christianity which does not contain large commu- 
nities of Catholic Christians. Thus, m Syria the entire 



584 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



nation or tribe of the Maronites, disperded over Mount 
Libanus, are subjects of the Roman see, governed by a 
patriarch and bishops appointed bj it. There are also 
other Sjriac Christians under other bishops, united to tho 
same see, who are dispersed all over Palestine and Syria 
At Constantinople there is a Catholic Armenian patriarch, 
who governs the united Armenians, as they are called, 
large communities of whom also exist in Armenia proper. 
The Abbd Dubois, in his examination before a committee 
of the English House of Commons, in 1832, stated tho 
number of Catholics in the Indian peninsula at 600,000, 
including Ceylon ; and this number is perhaps rather un- 
derrated than otherwise. They are governed by four 
bishops, and four vicars apostolic with episcopal consecra- 
tion. A new one has been added for Ceylon. We have 
not the means of ascertaining the number of Catholics in 
China; but in the province of Su-Chuen alone they were 
returned, September 22, 1824, at 47,487 {Annales de la 
Propag. de la Foi^ No. XI., p. 257); and an official re- 
port published at Rome, in the same year, gives those in 
the provinces of Fo-kien and Kiansi at 40,000. There 
are seven other provinces containing a considerable num- 
ber of Catholics, of which we have no return. In the 
united empire of Tonkin and Cochin- China, the Catholics 
of one district were estimated at 200,000 {Ibid., No. X., 
p. 194) ; and, till the late persecution, there was a college 
with 200 students, and convents containing 700 religious. 
Another district gave a return, in 1826, of 2955 infants 
baptized, which would give an estimate of 88,000 adult 
Christians. A third gave a return of 170,000. M. Du- 
bois estimated the number of native Catholics in the Phi- 
lippine Islands at 2,000,000. In Africa, the islands of 
Mauritius and Bourbon are Catholic^ and all the Portu- 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



585 



gnese settlements on the coasts, as well as tlie Azores, 
Madeira, the Cape Verde, and the Canary Islands. 

Hie history of the Roman Catholics in this country be- 
gins with the discovery of Columbus, the Roman Catholic 
subject of a Roman Cathelic governi^ent. Their first im- 
portant movement in gaining a footing within the present 
boundaries of the United States was made by Lord Balti- 
more. He obtained from Charles I. the charter of Mary- 
land, and appointed his brother Leonard Calvert to be 
governor of the new colony. The first body of emigrants 
consisted of about two hundred gentlemen of rank and for- 
tune. They reached the shores of the Potomac in 1632. 

The early missions of this denomination extended to all 
the principal tribes of the aborigines, and explored the 
countries of the great lakes and the Mississippi. That 
portion of the Roman Catholics which have descended from 
the early settlers of the country are comparatively liberal 
in their views, and many of them except to the exclusive 
spirit of the ancient hierarchy, and allow their Protestant 
brethren to be good Christians, so far as they adorn the 
Christian faith by a devout and charitable spirit. In the 
early settlement of Louisiana nearly all the people were 
Roman Catholics. The laws were originally made to favor 
that form of religion. They have been gradually changed 
or relaxed in their administration. So late, however, as 
1834 or 1835, the Presbyterian church in New Orleans 
was not allowed to ring its bell for a week-day evening 
service, on the ground of an old law which restricted that 
right to the Roman Catholic churches. Yet, it ought to be 
eaid in perfect fairness that the Roman Catholics were not 
the persons to request the enforcement of the odious law. 
Its execution was threatened only by Protestants, and the 
Protestant council of the second municipality refused to 
grant the permission which the law gave them power tc 



586 



ROMAN CATHOLICS. 



grant as a special favor. Probably no portion of our popu- 
lation are more perfectly tolerant in their principles and 
feelmcrs, than the Roman Catholics of Louisiana. 

o 

From the period of the early settlement of Maryland 
and the banks of the Mississippi, there was but a sliglit 
increase of the people of this persuasion till within the last 
twenty years. 

Lately the tide of foreign immigration has greatly 
swollen, and the' increase of Roman Catholics is rapid. 
They now constitute more than one-twentieth of our popu- 
lation. Considering, however, the excess of Protestant in- 
crease from births and immigration, and the great mortS,lity 
of the poor foreigners, it is doubted whether the ratio of 
increase of Roman Catholics is as great as that of the 
Protestants. 

It ought also to be acknowledged with thankfulness to 
God, that in all their published declarations the Roman 
Catholic priesthood express their distinct disapprobation 
of all violence and unfairness in enforcing the claims of 
their religion. One of their gifted writers says, If it 
[proselytism] imply the use of any means that are unfair, 
unhandsome, dishonorable, or uncharitable ; of violence, 
bribery, false arguments, or any other means whatsoever 
than such as are dictated by the strictest truth and ani- 
mated by pure benevolence, then, indeed, is proselytism as 
odious as it is unchristian ; then, be it far from every 
Catholic and from every Christian. Be it hated and 
detested by every lover of honesty, of truth, and of 
charity." 

The Roman Catholics have numerous institutions of 
learning, nunneries, orphan asylums, and various founda- 
tions of charity. 

The Roman Catholic Church in the United States had, 
in 1873, 7 archbishops, 57 bishops and vicars apostolic, 1 



SPIRITUALISTS. 



587 



administrator, 5 mitred abbots, 5018 priests, 4784 congre- 
gations and a Catiiolic population of about 4,428,000. 

It has 16 theological seminaries, 58 colleges, some of 
them of high grade, but many only collegiate schools; 157 
schools and academies of lower grade. 

They have a considerable number of periodicals, in- 
cluding daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual 
publications, and a fair and increasing literature. 

The increase of the Roman Catholics in this country, 
though rapid, has not kept pace with that of the popula- 
tion, and has been due almost entirely to the large immi- 
gration from Catholic countries. J^s^ow that this has 
declined, and the larger portion of the immigration is 
from Protestant countries, we may expect to see a corre- 
sponding decline in the growth of the Roman Catholic 
Church. 



SPIRITUALISTS. 

Spikitualism is a form of religion which existed from 
antiquity, but as a sect, Spiritualists are the youngest of 
the existing denominations. The first representatives of 
it resided in Rochester, New York, who, about the year 
1848, began to attract the attention of the public, by de- 
claring that they held communications with departed 
spirits by means of rapping on tables, knocking on the 
walls, and other mysterious and unaccountable noises. 

So remarkable a phenomenon at once excited general 
attention, and several parties were formed in reference to 
the subject, some asserting the genuineness of the mat- 
ter, others contending that the whole was an imposture, 



588 



SPIRITUALISTS. 



and that no communication had. taken place, or possibly 
could take place, between the living and the dead. Not- 
withstanding the opposition which was arrayed against 
Spiritualism, facts continued to accumulate, and experi 
ments were made which seemed to stagger the belief of 
the most incredulous, and made it very difficult for those 
who condemned Spiritualism as an imposition, to account 
for them. 

The great principle of Spiritualism is, that the spirits 
of the departed, who are no longer "in the form," can 
and do hold intelligent and sensible intercourse with 
those still living ; and that they accomplish this result ia 
various ways, by raps on tables, by messages, by moving 
material objects about, by prophecies, by writing and 
speaking unknown tongues, by spiritual shocks and 
touches of the person, by spiritual melodies, and by/the 
visible appearance of spirits to the living. 

ithin the last sixteen years thousands of persons have 
been thus used as mediums of communication with the 
spirits of the departed. Some are made to see and de- 
scribe spirits, others are controlled to write out communi- 
cations, often giving test facts unknown to the medium, 
and sometimes written in Phonography, Greek, Latin, 
or some language not understood by any one present. In 
the presence of some mediums, tables, chairs, and othe 
articles are moved, and sometimes raised and carrieu. 
about the loom, by invisible means. Bells are rung, 
drums beaten horns blown, guitars, dulcimers, banjoes 
tambourines \iolins, accordeons, and pianos, aie played 
upon by invis.Vie operators. Impressional and inspira- 
tional mediums .lave had positive demonstratiom of spirit 
influence; and hundreds of thousands have had tests 
which have fully convinced them of the possibility oi 
communicating with departed friends and relatives. 



SPIRITUALISTS. 



589 



The majority of Spiritualists conteiud, that these 
manifestations are not confined to the present or recent 
times, but that they have existed in all ages, though 
their real nature was unknown and unsuspected. Of 
this kind, they contend, were the revelations of God to 
Moses on Mount Sinai, in the Shekinah, those made to 
Isaiah, and the other Hebrew Prophets, the appear- 
ance of angels at the sepulchre of Christ, and various 
other events in the Scriptures. 

The instruments by means of which communications 
are alleged to take place between spirits and the living, 
are called media. These media are of various kinds. 
Writing media, who write while in a state of trance, 
and whose hands are entirely under the contiol of the 
spirits. Speaking media, who, while in a state of trance, 
8peak under the influence of spirits. Seeing media, 
whose development is so high and perfect, that they 
can see spirits with their physical sight. Discerning 
media, who, by placing a sealed letter on top of their 
heads, or on the palms of their hands, can read the 
contents. Normal media, who speak in a natural state, 
but are under the influence of a temporary inspiration. 
Some media are public, others are private ; and media 
of both kinds possess difierent degrees of excellence 
and power. 

Spiritualists also contend that spirits are themselves 
possessed of diflferent degrees of capability to commu- 
nicate with those "in the form," or who are still alive 
and in the body. Before a spirit can read, or commu- 
nicate through the alphabet, it must possess the neces- 
sary acquaintance with letters. A spirit which left the 
body without being able to read, and without any 
acquaintance with science, cannot make communica- 
tions which involve scientific knowledge. It is also 

50 



e590 



SPIRITUALISTS. 



alleged that the medium through which spirits commu- 
nicate is a certain liuid in the atmosphere, which is 
more subtle than ether; hence the state of the weathei 
has an important bearing on their communications. 
In damp, rainy, and dreary weather, when the atmos- 
phere is heavy, they are restricted in their operations, 
because of the deficiency of this mysterious fluid. 

By the use of these means, Spiritualists have arrived 
at the adoption of the following doctrinal opinions, 
which they regard as their system of belief: — They be- 
lieve in the existence of a Supreme Being, and of the 
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. But they do not regard 
these three as coequal, separate, and divine personages, 
according to the orthodox views of the Christian 
Trinity. They believe that all the spirits who now 
exist in the " Spirit world," once existed in connect 
tion with a physical body, or, as their jargon terms it, 
"in the form." That the Spirit world is composed of 
a great number of spheres, each one of which is divided 
and subdivided into a number of minor spheres, whose 
variety is equal to the variety of individualities which 
exist among men on earth. That the first sphere into 
which the spirit passes when it leaves " the form" is, 
in many respects, the counterpart of their condition 
here, and advanced but a single degree beyond their 
character and condition here. That the spirits of 
higher spheres can read the thoughts of all those 
spirits which belong to lower spheres. That the spirit 
of man is immortal ; and that the nature of the sphere 
into which a man enters in the other world depends 
upon his character when he dies. If his character and 
feelings are base, he will enter into a base sphere. 
That for every injury infiicted on others, the spirit 
shall be punished by the suffering of mental tortures pro- 
portioned to the degree of his crime. 



SPIRITUALISTS. 



591 



Spiritualists also hold that the natural tendency of 
spirits in the future world is one of constant progres- 
sion from lower to higher spheres, and that every man's 
moral status at death is the starting point from which 
he enters the future state. As to infants, they think 
that, on entering the world of spirits, they are taken in 
charge by developed matrons, who educate them, and 
gradually introduce them into higher circles, and con- 
tinue their care until they become adults. This is done, 
unless in the meantime the mother of the child arrives 
n the spirit world ; in which case, if she be fit to enter 
the same sphere, the child will be entrusted to her cus- 
tody, if not, it will be retained in the care of those wiio 
are r«ore lit for the i^esponsibiHty. 

Some recent developments of the origin and tendencies 
of the system professed by Spiritualists have given it a 
startling importance. William B. Potter, M. D., of Tren- 
ton, N. J., in a pamphlet dated June 7, 1866, entitled 
^^FaciSy Fancies and Follies of Spiritualism Fxplained,^' 
has given a testimony which claims to be of the highest 
- authority, from which we shall freely quote. The matter 
belongs to the public, if only in the way of warning. Dr. 
' Potter, himself a leading medium, says : 

^'Fifteen years critical study of Spiritual literature, an 
extensive acquaintance with the leading Spiritualists, and 
a patient, systematic and thorough investigation of the man- 
ifestations for many years, enable us to speak from actual 
knowledge, definitely and positively, of Spiritualism As It Is. 

" Spirit communications, full of the wildest fancies and 
the most absurd and contradictory teachings, have been so 
common that it is no wonder that men of science and 
sound sense, who have not had the most ample test of 
spirit manifestations, look upon the whole thing as the 
vagaries of a diseased brain, the halhicinations of a moon- 
struck imagination, or the tricks of the vilest impostors. 



592 



SPIRITUALISTS. 



" Among the innumerable follies of which Spiritualists 
have been guilty, the greatest is follo^Ndng the advice of 
free-lovers, libertines and low spirits, in refusing to disfel- 
lowship the persistently vicious, when it is a notorious fact 
that many mediums are practicing the most detestable 
trickery, deceit, fraud and felsehood ; that leading teach- 
ers, noted mediums and popular speakers have deserted 
companions, obtained divorces, gone off with affinities or 
practiced promiscuous intercourse to get spiritual elements 
or to impart vital magnetism for the cure of diseases ! 
Hundreds of families have been broken up and many affec- 
tionate wives deserted by affinity-seeking husbands; many 
once devoted wives have been seduced and left their hus- 
bands and tender, helpless children, to follow some higher 
attraction ; many well-disposed but simple-minded girls 
have been deluded by affinity notions, and led off by affin- 
ity hunters, to be deserted in a few months, with blasted 
reputations, or led to deeds still more dark and criminal 
to hide their shame. Yet, in the face of all this, at the 
Xational Convention of Spiritualists, at Chicago, called to 
consider the question of a Xational Organization, the only 
plan approved by its committee especially provided that 
jVo charge should ever he entertained against any member, 
and that any person, without any regard to moral character, 
might become a member. 

"The fact of so much immorality and licentiousness 
among Spiritualists is mainly due to three things: 1st. The 
teachings of seducing spirits, who have constantly and per- 
sistently, in every possible way, from the gentlest and 
most covert to the boldest and most reckless, assailed the 
binding force of marriage bonds. Xearly every case of 
affinity, folly or free-love crime, from first to last, has been 
approved, if not planned, by spirits. 2d. The magnetism 
of low, selfish, sensual, deceitful spirits tends to develop 



SPIRITUALISTS. 



593 



the same traits in mediums subject to their influence. The 
downward course of many mediums is owing to this 
cause. 3d. Sensual, deceitful spirits naturally seek me- 
diums of like character, whom they aid and incite to prac- 
tice the most debasing and detestable trickery, deceit and 
sensuality. The private history of many mediums, if 
made public, would astound and disgust the better class of 
Spiritualists.'' 

The Spiritualists have been wont to exaggerate most 
grossly their numbers. In 1859 the "Spiritual Register'' 
made the following statement : " The number of actual 
Spiritualists in America is 1,500,000; of those who have 
more or less faith in the doctrine, but do not openly es- 
pouse it, 4,000,000 ; public advocates, 1000 ; mediums, 
public and private, 40,000 ; places for public meetings, 
1000 ; books and pamphlets, 500 ; periodicals, 30." A 
more unmitigated series of falsehoods than these never 
blurred fair white paper. There never were 150,000 
avowed Spiritualists in the United States ; there are not 
to-day one-half that number ; there never were 200,000 
who had leanings that way ; there are not 50,000 to-day. 
There never were 200 regular places of meeting for Spirit- 
ualists. In 1870, according to the census, there were but 
22, and at the same time only 95 Sj^iritualist clubs or other 
organizations. Of the number of mediums we risk little 
in saying that there were never more than 6000 or 8000 ; 
and now since so many of them have been put in jail or 
State's prison as abortionists, procuresses, etc., we doubt if 
^1000 could be found who would acknowledge that they 
were mediums. If all the broadsheets were counted, 
there may have been 350 publications on Spiritualism; 
but an actual count of pamphlets and books, including all 
the infidel and atheistic books put out under the name of 
Spiritualism, gives only 192. 

60* 2 N 



APPEITDIX. 



BEETHEEN, ok PLYMOUTH BEETHEEN. 

This deuomination originated about 1830 in England. 
Its founder was Rev. John Darby, an English barrister 
of high standing and good social position, who abandoned 
the law and became a clergyman of the Church of Eng- 
land, and was very active in missionary labors in Ireland 
for several years ; but being conscientiously opposed to the 
doctrine of apostolical succession, he withdrew from that 
Church and founded one which recognized no distinctive 
ministry and no formal organization. His followers, like 
their leader, are generally Millenarians, or believers in the 
speedy second coming and personal reign of Christ on 
earth. They recognize no other title except that of Breth- 
ren or Christians ; they are decided Calvinists in doctrinal 
belief; they hold that all the Lord's children are priests 
and kings in his service, and that any one of them who 
feels that he is called to the work has a right to preach or 
to administer ordinances. They permit no licensure or 
ordination, and all preaching is voluntary and without 
salary or compensation. They baptize adults on a profes- 
sion of faith — recognizing immersion as the only mode of 
baptism — but do not consider this indispensable to mem- 
bership. They do not allow infant baptism. They ex- 
clude persons from participating in the Lord's Supper who 
have been guilty of gross sins. The Lord's Supper is cele- 
brated every Sabbath morning. In the afternoon or eve- 

594 



A 1* f E ^\ D i X . 



595 



niiig of the Lord's day they preach to and pray for such 
as are not converted. They are firm believers in the effi- 
cacy of prayer for special blessings, temporal as well as 
sj)iritual, and several of their prominent members have 
conducted great benevolent enterprises solely by praying 
earnestly for the needed funds. The wonderful success of 
the orphan asylums and missionary enterprises of George 
Miiller, of Bristol, one of their most eminent members, 
conducted on this plan, has been widely heralded. The 
hospital for consumptives in Boston, managed by Dr. 
Collis, one of the fraternity, has been signally successful 
in the same wa}^ The denomination has had a rapid 
growth in England and on the Continent, and has many 
eminent men among its members. Several English noble- 
men have labored diligently as preachers in its ranks. - 
They have a considerable following in the United States ; 
but as it is one of their principles to give no statistics of 
their numbers, it is not possible to obtain any very definite 
idea of their membership. 



CHEISTADELPHIANS. 

(BRETHREN OF CHRIST.) 

The distinctive name Christadelphian is derived from 
two Greek words — Christos (Christ) and Adelphos (broth- 
er) — and has been chosen as a fit representation of the inti- 
mate spiritual connection subsisting between Christ and 
scriptural believers in him. 

Its scriptural authority are the words of the Apostle 
Paul in Heb. ii. 11, " For which cause he is not ashamed 
to call them brethren f also same chapter, 12th, 13th and 
17th verses; also Col, i. 2, ^^To the saints and faithful 
brethren in Christ.'^ 



596 



APPENDIX. 



This sect owes its origin largely, iu the hands of God, 
to the efforts of John Thomas, deceased in 1871, an Eng- 
lishman by birth, a physician by profession, who emigrated 
to the United States in 1832. During a visit to Cincin- 
nati, he came in contact with the teaching of the Disciples, 
a sect of which the late Alexander Campbell was a promi- 
nent leader, and soon after became a preacher of its pecu- 
liar tenets. ■ The Disciples at this time were actively 
engaged, especially in the West, in a great religious move- 
ment, termed by them the " Reformation," which consisted 
largely in the teaching that the Bible was the sole and 
only arbiter of Christian faith and practice ; the duty of 
all men to return to the simplicity of apostolic belief and 
practice, and as a motto appropriate to such admirable 
teaching, had selected the words of the Apostle Paul — 
" Prove all things ; hold fast that which is good." 

Dr. Thomas, entering into the spirit of this movement, 
began an impartial, honest inquiry into the fundamental 
principles of apostolic Christianity, and after a mature, 
extended investigation, covering a period of many years, 
was convinced that in many respects wide departures from 
the Gospel preached by the apostles had been made. 

But the Disciples as a body were unwilling to go the 
full length of the Reformation they had so grandly 
initiated. As a consequence, Dr. Thomas was compelled 
to sever his connection with them, and take an independ- 
ent stand upon what he believed the Scriptures clearly 
and harmoniously taught. 

The result of Dr. Thomas's teaching was the formation 
of a considerable number of ecclesias or churches of believ^- 
ers in the United States, Canada, Great Britain and Aus- 
tralia, upon a basis of belief the principal features of 
which are outlined below. 

These churches are organized as closely as may be upon 



APPENDIX. 



597 



the apostolic plan. The duties connected with the public 
exercises of worship are performed by the brethren in 
their proper order. 

They are immersionists, but hold that all immersions 
are invalid unless accompanied with a knowledge of the 
apostolic Gospel. 

They celebrate the Lord's Supper each Sunday, are op- 
posed to bearing arms in behalf of any nation, unless by 
divine appointment, and take no part in politics. 

Their central publication office is at Birmingham, Eng- 
land, where the various writings defensive of their position, 
and their monthly organ, the " Chris tadelphian/' are pub- 
lished. 

Their present membership, as near as can be ascertained, 
numbers about 5000 members. 

They aim to return to the simple, pure faith of apostolic 
times, as contained in New Testament history. They attach 
equal importance to the teachings of the Old and New 
Testaments, treating one as a necessary counterpart to the 
other, and firmly believing that when taken together and 
interpreted upon the same broad principles of reason and 
intelligence which characterize modern scientific investiga- 
tion, free from prejudice and preconceived opinions, they 
will reveal the true relation of man to his Creator, and also 
exhibit the past acts of the Deity and his future relations 
and purposes as foreshadowed in his Word, as founded 
upon the highest principles of wisdom, and dictated by 
supreme love and affection for the objects of his creation. 
They understand the great fundamental principle of the 
teaching of the Scriptures to be the intention of the Deity 
to people this earth with immortal beings who have shown 
their love and devotion to him, while in this probationary 
state, by implicitly believing his Word and displaying a 
character in harmony therewith. To this fundamental 



598 



APPENDIX. 



proposition they believe that all of God's past and future 
acts are subordinate. The nature of man they believe, 
from abundant Scripture testimony, and the teachings of 
reason, to be of the "earth, earthy,'' and the popular ideas 
of man's inherent immortality to be without God's author- 
ity, and in direct collision with the great revealed truths ' 
of the Scriptures. Death they believe to be, both from the 
direct teaching of the Scripture and the experience of man- 
kind, the resolution of man into dust, and an extinction 
of life. 

Hence the great central feature in the apostolic teaching 
of the resurrection of the dead, as practically exhibited in 
the death and resurrection of our Saviour, becomes an 
event with them of momentous importance. 

It is at that period when, at the hands of the only vice- 
gerent God will accept of, the dead will be raised from 
their slumbers, those who are found worthy invested with 
immortality, and those who have disgraced the name of 
their Master remanded into eternal death. The "devil" 
is believed to be simply a scriptural expression, covering 
sin and the impulses of the flesh, thus rejecting the idea of 
an immortal, diabolical being, constantly opposing the will 
of the Deity, and by his wiles and subtleties enticing men 
to their destruction. They believe in one God, omniscient, 
omnipotent, substantial, corporeal, dwelling somewhere in 
the vast expanse about us, creating and maintaining all 
things by his Spirit, radiating from his person or presence, 
and which, when concentrated in the hands of his repre- 
sentative angels, enabled them to create the world and the 
things therein, and when filling or investing his prophets, 
a^^ostles and Jesus Christ, enabled them to perform the 
wondrous works recorded in the Scriptures. They believe 
Jesus Christ, by the supernatural circumstances of his 
birth, to have been the Son of God, deriving from God 



APPENDIX. 



.599 



supreme moral character, and inheriting from his mother 
the common nature of Adam. That he was not God, 
neither a mere man, nor had an existence prior to his 
supernatural birth or creation. That he was destined in 
the wisdom of God to play three great characters in the 
drama of human affairs — Prophet, Priest or Mediator, 
King ; that he has fulfilled the r61e of Prophet ; that he 
is now officiating as High Priest or Mediator for the faith- 
ful, but has yet to return to the earth and assume his 
kingly office, which consists as a lineal descendant and the 
legal heir of David in his rule over the twelve tribes of 
Israel, located and established in their native land. This 
has been the hope of Israel for centuries, and all the ma- 
lignity and cruelty that man could invent or suggest never 
could obliterate it from their hearts and fondest aspira- 
tions. With God's holy nation as immediate subjects, the 
returned King of the Jews as the King of Glory, his asso- 
ciate kings and priests the purified saints of the preceding 
ages, God will establish a divine and just government over 
the entire world, thus securing to mankind privileges and 
advantages never before enjoyed : obliterating war from 
the annals of mankind, distributing righteousness over the 
earth as the waters cover the sea, instructing the entire 
human family, from the least to the greatest, in the know- 
ledge of God, and withdrawing the attention of men from 
the internecine struggle for bread and illusory power, to 
love and devotion to their Creator and the study and con- 
templation of his works. 

The works of the Christadelphians are various, but the 
most prominent and comprehensive treating upon these 
questions are from the pen of Dr. Thomas, and are Elpis; 
Israel; Eureka, an exposition of the Apocalypse ; Fhanero- 
sis, a treatise upon the unity and manifestation of the 
Deity ; Ana^tasis, judgment and resurrection. 



600 



APPENDIX. 



PROGRESSIYE FRIENDS. A portion of tlie Ilicksite 
Quakers residing in the neighborhood of Philadelphia, about 
the year 1855, organized under this name, to indicate the pro- 
gressive character of their inquiries and convictions on the 
subject of religion. They hold an annual meeting at Long- 
wood, where large congregations assemble for addresses, con- 
sultations, etc., as well as public worship, and publish an annual 
report of their proceedings. They profess unlimited freedom 
of inquiry. 

CHRISTIANS. It is an error to suppose that a^.] this 
denomioation are Unitarians. Many of them, especially in 
New England, are orthodox and evangelical in their creed. 
They accept the doctrines of the Trinity and the Atonement, 
and only object to the use of the word person" in reference 
tj that sublime mystery. These are the views expressed 
in their denominational organ. 

ARMENIANS. It is a noticeable fact that, .after so many 
centuries of alienation, there is now manifested a spirit of re- 
union between this body of Eastern Christians and the Greok 
Church. Negotiations to this end are now in progress. 

GNOSTICS. This name f which properly signifies Scien^ 
tifics) was an attempt of the philosophers of the East to blend 
Jie science of their time ("science," falsely so called) with 
Christianity. The same thing is repeated at this time in 
Germany and France, and with like corrupting effects. 

RATIONALISTS. This is the name, not so much of an 
organized sect, as of a class of men diffused through many 
sects, whose distinguishing character is that tiiey exalt their 
own reason above the divine reason, as revealed in the Scrip- 
tures, whether professing Christianity or not. In those who 
profess Christianity, this spirit is most dangerous as well as 
disingenuous. 



APPENDIX. 



601 



The twaddle of bigotry aud sectarianism, it has been justly 
said, is bad enough ; but this modern cant of freedom of 
thought, which has degenerated into an utter disregard of all 
positive truth, and sacrifices the obvious import of Scripture, 
contemptuously called its letter, for a fanciful something 
termed its spirit, is infinitely worse. 

^ n eclectic reverence for the word of God is a virtual rejec* 
tion of it as the word of God. If the New Testament be a 
revelation from heaven for the guidance of man, it must be 
accepted in its integrity. Our first business is to see to it 
that we have the inspired word as God gave it. In this in- 
vesLigation we should thankfully accept all the evidence fur- 
nished by manuscripts, by patristic quotations, by history, 
and by the various processes of a sound and reverential criti- 
cism. Our next duty is to ascertain the import of the testi. 
mony, as borne by the sacred book. Here, again, we should 
gladly avail ourselves of every aid which an enlightened and 
pains-taking^ investigation can afford. But when we have 
reached the goal of suck inquiries, what then ? Shall we 
proceed to eliminate from the book which we have just con- 
sented to receive as a divine revelation, all the authority and 
decisiveness which should stamp such a heavenly communi- 
cation ? Surely a God-inspired book should be treated as 
such ; and unless its decisions be accepted as final, on all 
matters on which it has spoken, it is only treated as we should 
deal with any other book. If reason is to determine what 
portions are to be received and what rejected, the supposed 
revelation adds nothing to us whatever, for reason we already 
had. If a revelation is not to guide reason, of what use is it ? 
If reason is to guide revelation, man is to be put above God. 
But verily this is a reductio ad ahsurdum. The fundamental 
« idea of a revelation is that of a final, infallible, and authorita 
tive communication from our Maker, which is to aid the im- 
perfections of reason, to correct her errors, and to enlarge the 
sphere of her knowledge — a communication, in fact, from 

51 



602 



APPENDIX. 



whose decisions there is no appeal. If we pay onlj an eclec- 
tic reverence to God's word, we treat that blessed book as we 
should do the writings of Plato, or Cicero, or Shakespeare; 
and the Bible is of no more use to us than any other tolerably 
good volume of human origin. See Deists, Latitudinarians. 
and Erastians. 

WICKLIEFITES. The influence of Wickliffe in preparing 
be Reformation of the sixteenth century seems to demand 
a more full development of his history and opinions than that 
given in the body of this book. Happily, new light has been 
recently shed upon the subject by the critical researches of 
Dr. Yaughan, of Dr. Boehring, and of Mr. Shirley ; the first, a 
Congregationalist, the second, a learned German scholai', and 
the last, a clergyman of the Church of England, the editor of 
his newly-published works. 

Dr. John Wickliffe was born near Richmond, in Yorkshire, 
in 1324, and educated at Baliol College, Oxford, where he 
long resided, and acquired the reputation of extraordinary 
talents, piety, and scholarship. In 1361, he was chosen 
Master of Baliol College, and the sane year, was presented 
with the rectory of Fylingham, in Lincolnshire. In 1363, h^ 
received his doctor's degree, and the appointment of Professor 
of Theology in the University. From this date, his public 
activity as a Reformer begins — nine years earlier than the 
common date of his appointment, as given by James, Le Bas, 
and even by Dr. Yaughn ; but it has been fixed by Mr 
Shirley. 

From 1363 to the last days of 1384, the year of his death, 
in the reigns of Edward III. and Rif;hard II., the reforming 
labors of WickliflPe were incessant: by his university lectures, 
his numerous publications, his pergonal preaching, his em 
nloyment of a large body of pious and faithful men, under tie 
name of " Simple Priests," to preach in all the villages of the 
kingdom, and, lastly, by the most important labor of his lifc^ 
THE Translation of the whole Bible into the English 



APPENDIX. 



603 



Tongue. This last has been justly pronounced the greatest 
work in Anglo-Saxon history. True, the modern power of 
the press was then unknown, but he was for years surrounded 
by a baud of active copyists and itinerants, through whom 
his writings and translations were widely diffused, notwith- 
standing all the efforts of his enemies. He never formally 
left the Church of Rome, but such was his unsparing exposure 
of her errors and corruptions, as his mind advanced in the 
knowledge and experience of the truth, that he was repeat- 
edly condemned as a heretic by the clergy and Pope, and 
would have been sacrificed as a martyr but for the protection 
of his powerful friends at court, and other providential inter- 
position. As it was, he was driven from the University early 
in 1382, and spent the last three years of his life in his rec- 
tory at Lutterworth, where his translations of the Bible and 
the best of his writings as a Keformer were produced. Such 
was the resistless influence of these, not only in England 
(where it is said that half the nation embraced his views), 
but on the Continent, in Germany and Bohemia, that the 
bigoted Council of Constance, in 1415, condemned not only 
his books, but ordered his very bones to be dug up and pub- 
licly burned to ashes, a sentence actually executed in 1428. 
But in vain did his enemies, the Romish clergy, thus insult 
the memory of the holy dead ; for, as old Fuller finely ob- 
serves, " The Swift conveyed his ashes into the Avon, the 
Avon into the Severn, the Severn into the narrow seas, they 
to the main ocean. And thus they are the emblem of his 
doctrine, which now is dispersed all the world over." 

As Wickliffe's reformatory opinions were progressive, and 
never perhaps attained to an entire freedom from Romish 
errors, it may be asked on what grounds Mr. Crosby claims 
him as a Baptist. Our space forbids us to state them in full, 
but briefly they are three. First, Wickliffe adopted general 
principles which invariably tend to Baptist views, such as the 
ufificiency and supremacy of the Scriptures, the right of all 
men to read them, and that no doctrine or ceremony is to be 



604 



APPENDIX. 



received in the church which is not sanctioned by the word 
of God. ''Wise men," he said, " leave that as impertinent 
which is not plainly expressed in Scripture." On this ground 
rejected the authority of the Komish Church, Episcopa(iy, 
the efficacy of baptism to wash away sins, and the perdition 
of unbaptized infants — the very foundation on which infant 
baptism then rested. Secondly, he was charged by contem- 
porary Catholic writers expressly with the denial of infant 
baptism. Among others, Thomas Waldensis, confessor to 
Henry Y., who had access to his writings, and published a 
"Fasciculi Zizaniorum,^^ or, Bundles of Tares, selected from 
them, says of Wicklifife : '' He doth positively assert that 
children are not to be sacramentally baptized." Thirdly, it is 
certain that many of his followers, called Lollards in England, 
and Ficards in Bohemia, were Baptists. The latter sect 
are thus described by a Roman Catholic, in a letter from 
Bohemia to the learned Erasmus, in 1519 : " They own no 
other authority than the Scriptures of the Old and New Tes- 
taments ; they believe or own little or nothing of the sacia- 
ments of the Church ; such as come over to their sect must 
every one be baptized anew in mere water ; they mutually 
salute one another by the name of brother and sister," &c. 
The writer of this letter admits that this sect had been in 
Bohemia for nearly a hundred years, that is, within thirty-six 
years after the death of Wickliffe, whose writings were so 
widely spread in Bohemia that, in 1410, two hundred volumes 
of them were found and burnt in the University of Prague. 
The reader can now judge how far this first great English 
Reformer embraced the sentiments of the Baptists, and dif- 
fused them through Europe. 

GREEK CHURCH. See Armenians, in Appendix 

MANICHAEANS. It is a very serious error to confound' 
the Paulicians with the Manichaeans. It was the ignorance 



APPENDIX. 



605 



or art of their enemies that led to this false imputation, which 
has been perpetuated by so many better men in modern times. 
But they themselves utterly denied the charge, as the learned 
Photius, in the ninth century, candidly admits. See Pauli- 
ciANS, in Appendix. 

ANABAPTISTS: Those who require a new baptism 
when, for any reason, the first is deemed invalid. Thus, 
Paul is generally supposed to have required the twelve dis- 
ciples at Ephesus to be baptized anew, because of their 
ignorance of the real purport and design of John's teaching. 
So, in the early Church, the Novatians and Donatists bap- 
tized all who joined them from the Catholic Church, on ac- 
count of its alleged corruptions. And, in like manner, the 
Catholics baptized anew those who had been baptized by the 
Arians, Manichaeans, and other reputed heretics. So, at this 
time, the Greek Church requires a new baptism of all who 
unite with them, from either Romanists or Protestants, alleg" 
ing, as one reason, that the W estern Churches, by forsaking 
immersion, have lost baptism. And the rule is rigorously 
enforced on the intermarriage of royal families, as of a prin- 
cess of Denmark or Prussia with a prince of Russia. 

In Church history, however, the name of Anabaptists is 
generally applied to a class of fanatical men who, at the be- 
ginning of the Reformation in the sixteenth century, raised 
violent disturbances in the centre of Europe, and brought 
upon themselves a lasting odium. These men, who remark 
ably resembled the Mormons of our times, like them rejected 
the baptism of infants, and baptized all who adopted their 
views, which w^ere really more political than religious. These 
religio-political fanatics were at the time confounded with the 
Baptists, from whom, however, they widely differed, except 
in the single point of baptism. Hence, also, much confusion 
has arisen in modern times, which needs to be cleared away. 

Many modern historians have undertaken to do this, but 
the fullest and fairest account of the whole subject which we 
51* 



606 



APPENDIX. 



have seen, is found in the " History of the Netherlands Re- 
formed Church," by Drs. Ypeig and Dermout, men of the 
highest standing in the Reformed Church of TTollanrl. Thr> 
work occupies four octavo volumes, and is written with great 
ability and candor. We shall quote a few extracts from it, 
sufficient, we think, to set this matter right. 

Since the peculiar history of the Anabaptists and Bap- 
tists has exerted so powerful an influence on the Reformation 
of the Church in this country, the nature of our historical 
work requires that we present in its true light the whole 
matter from its origin. 

" The fanatical Anabaptists, of whom we are now to speak, 
were originally from Germany, where, under the bishopric 
of Spiers, they, by a rebellion had made known their dis 
pleasure at the oppressions of the so-called feudal system 
This was in the year 1491. Since that time they, by theii 
revolts, had often caused anxiety, and given the Government 
no little trouble. This continued until the time of the Re- 
formation, when these rebels sought in the new religion an 
augmented power, and made the most shameful misuse, of it 
to the promotion of their harassing disturbances. These 
ought by no means to be considered the same as the Baptists. 
Let the reader keep this distinctly in mind in the statement 
which we now make respecting them. . . . 

''Although there were among the Romanists those who 
were better informed, yet even among these were some under 
the influence of prejudice, which does not spare even the 
learned. They would not see that which they might have 
seen. How evident it was that although the Baptists ap- 
p ared to agree exactly with the Anabaptists in respect to 
Ihii baptismal question, the former entirely disapproved of 
the course pursued by the latter. And yet the Romanists 
without dissent agree in ascribing these things to all the 
Baptists. 

"We have nowhere seen clearer evidences of the injurious 
fnfluence of prejudice. Nowhere have we met with a more 



APrSNDIX. 



607 



obstinate unwillingness to be correctly informed, and a more 
evident disposition to silence those who better understood the 
truth of the matter. Prejudice, when once deeply imbibed, 
blinds the eye, perplexes the understanding, silences the 
instincts of the heart, and destroys the love of truth and 
rectitude." 

" The Baptists are Protestant Christians, entirely different 
from the Anabaptists in character. They were descended 
from the ancient Waldenses, whose teachings were evangeli- 
cal and tolerably pure, and who were scattered by severe 
persecutions in various lands, and long before the time of the 
Reformation of the Church, were existing in the Netherlands. 
In their flight, they came hither. In this country and in Flan- 
ders, in Holland and Zealand, they lived as quiet inhabitants, 
not intermeddling with the affairs of Church and State : in the 
villages tilling the land, and in the cities, working at some 
trade, or engaged in traflic, by which means each one was well 
Bupplied, and in no respect burdensome to society. Their 
manner of life was simple and exemplary. No great crime 
was known among them. Their religious teaching was sim- 
ple and pure, and was exemplified in their daily conduct. — 
In the sight of the authorities they lived as peaceful citizens, 
obedient, and noted for their uprightness, honesty, conscien- 
txoasness, temperance and godliness. The earliest Romanist 
writers, who are willing to pay a proper respect lo the truth, 
admit this to have been the fact. 

" From this narrative it is not difficult to understand how 
greatly the Waldenses of the Netherlands, or so called Ana- 
baptists, were pleased when Luther and his followers so 
zealously commenced the Reformation. They immediately 
made known this approbation. They glorified God, who in 
their time had raised up brethren with whom they could so 
well unite, at least in the main points. They also immediately 
put their hand to the work. Yet they adhered firmly to their 
own peculiar views, especially respecting the baptism of 
adults, although these were of less importance. These wor- 



608 



APPENDIX. 



thj Anabaptists, or as thej may more properly be called 
Baptists, were to be found in great numbers in the ^s'ether- 

lands." The case is thus summed up : 

The course which the work of the Reformation had taken 
required that we should give an extended account, both of 
the Anabaptists and of the Baptists. The former, as we have 
seen, exerted a very injurious influence upon the outwar-d 
condition of the Protestant community. We think that the 
latter exerted an extensive internal influence upon all the 
Protestant Christians in the Netherlands." A conclusion so 
candid, from such men, must command respect. 

There is a want of accuracy in the original article 
on this subject in the body of this work, which demands 
correction. In the first place, the definition is wrong, as it is 
restricted to a particular class of religionists, when it pro- 
perly extends to all, who for any reason repeat baptism, 
in adult years. Immersion was in early times the prac- 
tice of all parties. Besides, at the Reformation many rejec- 
ted infant baptism, while they retained the use of sprinkling. 

In the next place, there were two totally difl'erent classes 
of men at that period, as we see above, who were most injustly 
confounded under this common name, and the errors and 
crimes of the one wrongfully imputed to the other. Mosheim 
himself does not, but this article, though mostly taken from 
Mosheim, is so carelessly written as to confound t&«m. 
Once more, in the same way, the Peasants' War in 1525 is 
first charged upon them indiscriminately and solely ; though 
it is afterward acknowledged that it was not a religious war 
at all, but a war for their civil rights and liberties, against the 
ntolerable oppressions of the feudal system, and that the 
4nabaptists (so called) had no more to do whh it than others — 
jutherans and Roman Catholics. 

LOLLARDS. See Wickliffites, in Appendix. 



PETROBRUSIAXS. See Waldenses, in Appendix. 



APPENDIX. 



609 



PATJLICIANS. It is an error in many writers to say, 
as is said in the article under this head, in the body of the 
work, that the Paulicians were a branch of the Manichaeans. 
Dr. Allix, Milner, and Jones, not to mention others, have 
cleared them of this calumny. They were Christians of an 
evangelical faith and spirit, who kept alive the flame of true 
piety in Europe in the middle ages. See Waldenses and 
Manichaeans, in the Appendix. 

MONOPHYSITES. The reader will find himself repaid 
for consulting on this point the articles Armenians, Nesto- 
EiANS, Jacobites, Maroniles, Eutychians, Copts, Mel- 
chites, Monothelites, and Abyssinian Church. 

PAGrANS. See Christianity, in the Appendix, for some 
important general views of their condition and prospects. 

BRAMmS : BUDDHISTS. See Christianity, in this 
Appendix. 

Since the great struggle of 185t, in India, to cast off the 
British dominion, and expel Christianity, a great change has 
come over the people. It is felt that the power of their gods, 
to whom they looked for success in that struggle, is gone, or 
at levist that it is now inferior, even on their ancient soil, to 
the God of the Christians. Hence Braminism is shorn of a 
great part of its former prestige, and there is growing up a 
disposition to hear Christian missionaries, and read Christian 
books with new respect and attention. Thousands are giving 
up their old belief and worship ; caste is broken with impu- 
nity ; and every thing betokens the speedy downfall of that 
mighty system of error. 

PAGANS OF CHINA. The most astonishing changes 
have taken place in China within the last twenty years. 
Before 1845, no Christian was permitted to set foot upon the 

2 



610 



A P P B N D I X. 



soil, beyond the Hong factories. Wow, the whole empire is 
open to the gospel. Toleration is guaranteed by treaty with 
foreign nations, and Christian missions (Protestant) are in 
successful operation in the principal seaports, the interior 
cities, and in Pekin itself, under the eye of the Emperor. 
Chinese translations of the Scriptures are widely diffused, 
and many evangelical churches planted. 

PAGANS OF JAPAN. After two centuries of inter- 
dict, Christianity has again gained a footing in Japan, and 
several Protestant missions have been established. 

PAGANS OF AFRICA. On this great continent ex- 
plorations are going on of a most important nature, and 
Christianity is pressing in on all sides. 

PAGANS OF MADAGASCAR. Since that article was 
first written, there has been a most important change in the 
island in favor of Christianity. It is not only tolerated, but 
encouraged by the Court. The missionaries have returned, 
and been welcomed with the liveliest demonstration of joy. 
Churches have been established, the Scriptures circulated, 
and converts multiplied. Evangelical Christianity is now iD 
the ascendant. 

PAGANS OF POLYNESIA. Australia is filling up 
with a civilized and Christian population. New Zealand 
has received Christian missionaries. The gospel has signally 
"triumphed, in overthrowing idolatry in the Society Islands, 
the Sandwich Islands, the Friendly, Fejee, and Marquesas 
Islands, and others, whose names have not yet become famil 
iar to Christendom. 

PAGANS OF AMERICA. The number of Indians of 
the various tribes within the territory of the United States, 



APPENDIX. 



611 



is now estimated at three hundred thousand. Most of these 
are yet Pagan. The number professing Christianity is not 
far from one hundred thousand. Beyond the United States, 
the number of the Pagan population is unknown. 

WALDENSES. It seems to be a serious mistake into 
which some popular writers have fallen, who represent the 
Waldenses as originating in France about the year 1160, and 
deriving their name from the celebrated Peter Waldo. The 
evidence is now ample, that so far from being a new sect at 
that period, they had existed under various names as a dis- 
tinct class of dissenters from the established churches of 
Greece and Rome in the earliest ages. It is an egregious 
error to suppose that when Christianity was taken into alli- 
ance with the State, by thj» Emperor Constantino, in the be- 
ginning of the fourth century, all the orthodox churches were 
so ignorant of the genius of their religion, as to consent to 
the corruption of a worldly establishment. 

Crantz (in his History of the United Brethren) says, 
" These ancient Christians who, besides the several names of 
reproach given them, were at length denominated Waldenses, 
from one of their most eminent teachers, Peter Waldo, date 
their origin from the beginning of the fourth century ; when 
one Leo, at the great revolution in religion under Con- 
stantino the Great, opposed the innovations of Sylvester, 
Bishop of Rome." 

The Gathari, or Puritan churches of the Novatians, also had 
at that very period (about A. D. 325) been flourishing as a 
distinct communion for more than seventy years, all over the 
empire ; maintaining by the acknowledgment even of their 
enemies, the self-styled CatJiolics, the integrity of the true 
faith, together with the purity of discipline and the power of 
godliness, which had generally disappeared from the Catholic 
churches. These Puritans being exposed to severe and san 
guinary persecutions for dissent^ from age to age, were com- 



612 



APPENDIX. 



pelled to shelter themselves from the desolating storm in re- 
tirement ; and when at intervals they reappear on the pages 
of contemporary history, and their principles are propagated 
with new boldness and success, they are styled a new sect, 
and receive a new name from their enemies, though in reality 
they are the same people. 

The same great principles of attachment to the word of 
God, and determined adherence to the simplicity of its doc- 
trine, discipline, institutions, and worship, in opposition to 
the innovations of a secular spirit and policy on the one hand, 
and of false philosophy or of pretended apostolic tradition on 
the other, may be traced under the name of Novatians, Dona- 
tists, Luciferians, and Brians, from the third to the seventh 
centuries. They reappear in the Paulicians, who have been 
falsely accused of Manichaeism, but who, from the middle of 
the seventh to the end of the ninth century, worthily sus- 
tained oy their preaching, their lives, and their martyrdoms, 
their claim of being the genuine descendants of the primitive 
churches. 

From Asia Minor they spread themselves over Europe, 
through Thrace, Macedonia, Epirus, Bulgaria, Sclavonia, 
Sicily, Lombardy, Liguria, and Milan ; whence, about the 
beginning of the eleventh century, they entered into France. 
The first discovery of a congregation of this kind in that 
country, was at Orleans, A. D. lOlt. A Catholic council 
was immediately convened, and the Paulician missionaries, 
with their converts, among whom were many respectable 
citizens and several of the regular clergy, were all burnt alive. 
Other advocates of the doctrine were discovered in Languedoc, 
others in Picardy and Suabia. They were called in France 
Bougres or Bulgarians, Tisserands or Weavers, Bos Homos 
or Good Men. 

They soon spread through Germany, where they were called 
by the old name of Cathari, or, by corruption, Gazari, i. e. 
Puritans. In Italy the same people were called Paterines, 
Josephists, Arnoldists, (and Fratricelli.) As early as the 



APPENDIX. 



613 



year 1100, it appears they began to be called Waldenses, 
sixty years before Peter Waldo. Their principles were 
powerfully advocated, and extended among the most intelli- 
gent classes in Languedoc and Provence, from 1110 to 1168, 
by the celebrated Peter de Bruys and Henry, his successor ; 
from whom they received the name of Petrobrusians and 
Henricians. From the places where they flourished they were 
called Toulousians, Albigenses, and afterward Poor Men of 
Lyons, and Leonists. They were condemned by a council at 
Toulouse in 1119, and again by the great Lateran council at 
Rome, in 1139. In 1160, some of them crossed from Gascony 
to England, where they were called Pophlicians and Publi- 
cans, corruptions of the original name, Paulicians. About 
this time arose the celebrated Peter Waldo, of Lyons, w^hoso 
labors, learning, zeal, and liberality, greatly extended their 
principles ; in consequence of which many writers, both 
Catholic and Protestant, have most erroneously regarded 
him as the parent and founder of the proper Waldenses. Mr. 
Robinson, however, has shown that this name had a much 
earlier origin, that it signifies, " inhabitants of the valleys,'' 
and that it was applied to the persecuted people of whom we 
have spoken, simply for the reason that great multitudes of 
them made their residence in the valleys of the Alps and of 
the Pyrenees, where, age after age, they found an asylum 
from the tyranny of the Church of Rome. This view of the 
matter, also, is supported by the testimony of their own 
historians, Pierre Gillies, Perrin, Leger, Sir Samuel Morland, 
and Dr. AUix. The names imposed on them by their adver- 
saries, they say, have been intended to vilify and ridicule 
them, or to represent them as new and different sects. 

Their enemies confirm their great antiquity. Reinerius 
Saccho, the inquisitor, admits that the Waldenses flourished 
five hundred years before Peter Waldo. This carries us back 
to the year 660, the time of the appearance of the Paulicians, 
or rather of their great revival and increase under the labors 
of Constantine SyJvanus Indeed, there is not wantir g evi» 

52 



6U 



APPENDIX. 



deuce to show that churches of the Puritan faith existed at 
that time in the West, as well as in the East. In the year 
553, nine bishops of Italy and Switzerland openlv refused 
communion with the Pope of Rome, and the churches under 
their care persisted in their dissent. To say nothing of the 
labors of those noble reformers in the bosom of the Catholic 
Church, Paulinus of Aquileia, in the eighth century, Claude 
of Turin in the ninth, the council af Rheims in the tenth, and 
Serenganas, archdeacon of Angers, in the eleventh, which 
yet exerted a powerful influence in opening the eyes of men 
to the corruptions of Rome ; if we will believe the testimony 
of the suffering Waldenses themselves, their doctrine and 
discipline had been preserved in all its purity and efficacy 
from the days of the primitive martyrs, in Spain, France, 
Germany, Italy, and especially in the valleys of Piedmont. 

The learned Dr. Allix, in his " History of the Churches of 
piedmont," gives this account : — " That for three hundred 
years or more, the bishop of Rome attempted to subjugate 
the church of Milan under his jurisdiction, and at last, the 
interest of Rome grew too potent for the church of Milan, 
planted by one of the disciples, insomuch that the bishop and 
the people, rather than own 'ts jurisdiction, retired to the 
valleys of Lucerne and Angrogne, and thence were called 
Vallenses, Wallenses, or The People in the Valleys.''^ 

M. Sismondi, in his late History of the Crusades against the 
Albigenses, says, " Those very persons who punished the secta- 
ries with frightful torments, have alone taken it upon themselves 
to make us acquainted with their opinions, allowing at the 
same time that they had been transmitted in Gaul from gener* 
ation to generation, almost from the origin of Christianity 
We cannot be astonished (he adds) if they have represented 
them to us with all those characters which might render them 
the most monstrous, mingled with all the fables which would 
serve to irritate the minds of the people against those who 
professed them. Nevertheless, amidst many puerile and 
calumnious tales, it is still easy to recognize the principles of 



615 



the Reformation of the sixteenth century among the heretics 
who are designated by the name of Yaudois or Albigeois." 

Dr. Allix, speaking of the Paterines, some of whom, disci- 
ples of Grundulf, one of their teachers, went from Italy to the 
Netherlands, where they were thrown into prison, says, "Here, 
t/hen, we have found a body of men in Italy before the year 
1026, five hundred years before the Reformation, who believed 
contrary to the opinions of the Church of Rome, and who 
highly condemned her errors." Mr. Jones adds, " Atto, 
bishop of Yerceulli, had complained of such people eighty 
years be/ore, and so had others before him, and there is the 
greatest reason to believe they had always existed in Italy. 
It is observable that those alluded to by Dr. Allix were 
brought to light by mere accident." About the year 1040, 
the Paterines had become very numerous at Milan, which 
was their principal residence; and in 1259, some of their 
churches in other Italian cities, we are informed by Reiner- 
fua the inquisitor, contained from five to fifteen hundred 
members. Their churches were organized into sixteen com- 
partments or associations. They had no connection with the 
Catholic Church, which they regarded as Antichrist from the 
time of Pope Sylvester. Now, when we reflect that the 
Paterines, as well as the Paulicians, both in principles and 
practice, were the same people as the Waldenses, or 
Leonists, we shall not wonder at the following remarka- 
ble words of Reinerius concerning the latter : 

" Of all the sects which have been, or now exist, none is 
more injurious to the Church, (i.e. of Rome,) for three rea- 
sons : 1. Because it is more ancient. Some aver their exist- 
ence from the time of Sylvester ; others from the very time 
of the apostles.- 2. Because it is so universal. There is 
Boarcely any country into which this sect has not crept. And 
3. Because all other heretics excite horror by the greatness 
of their bLisphemies against God ; but these have a great 
appearance of piety, as they live justly before men, believe 
rightly all things concerning God, and confess all the articles 



616 



APPENDIX. 



which are contained in the creed ; only they hate and revile 
the Church of Kome, and in their accusations are easily be- 
lieved by the people." 

Such a concession, from such a source, speaks volumes. 
Here then is a succession of faithful men, whose apostolic 
origin, perpetuity, universal though often hidden diffusion, 
general orthodoxy, evangelical simplicity and sanctity of 
character, is admitted by the Church of Rome herself; a 
succession of faithful men, organized, too, into Christian 
churches, claiming to be the true successors of the apostles, 
protesting against all the corruptions of the patriarchate 
and the papacy, and for this reason subject to continual per- 
secution from both, through the hands of the secular powers 
to which they are allied ; a Church built not on St. Peter 
alone, but on the entire foundation of the apostles and proph- 
ets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone, and 
against which the gates of hell have not been able to prevail. 
May we not say then, in the language of Revelation, " Here 
is the patience and faith of the saints ? These are they that 
keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus ?" 
Rev. xiv. 12. 

It also appears that the re<iesses of the Alps and the Pyr- 
enees were distinguished retreats of these persecuted Chris- 
tians in the darkest ages of tho Church. Or, as Mr. Robin- 
son observes, in his Ecclesiastical Researches, *' Greece was 
the parent, Spain and Navarre ihe nurses, France the step- 
mother, and Savoy (1 e. Piedmont) the jai'or of this class of 
Christians called Waldenses." 

Their principles. — From the united attestation of their 
enemies and their own confessions of faith, we learn that the 
ancient Waldenses were distinguished chiefly by the following 
points : — 

1. Their attachment to the Scriptures. — They held that 
the Holy Scriptures are the only source of faith and religion, 
without regard to the authority of the fathers and tradition. 
Although they principally used the T^Tew Testam^^ut yet, &Q 



APPENDIX. 



617 



Uslier proves, they regarded the Old also as canonical Scrip- 
ture. " They translated the Old and New Testament," says 
Reinerius, " into the vulgar tongues, and spake and taught 
according to them." From their greater use of the New 
Testament, however, as Venema observes, their adversaries? 
took occasion to charge them with despising the Old. 
** Hence, whatever a doctor of the Church teaches," says 
Reinerius, " which he does not prove from the New Testa- 
ment, they consider it as entirely fabulous — contrary to the 
doctrine of the (Romish) Church. He adds, " I have heard and 
seen a certain unlearned rustic, who recited the book of Job, 
word by word, and many who perfectly knew the New Testa- 
ment." This is high praise. 

2. Their Scriptural simplicity, and soundness of belief.—^ 
Their adversaries frequently acknowledge this ; see the testi- 
mony of the inquisitor above. It is amply confirmed aho by 
their own authentic monuments and confessions of faitn, of 
which several are printed at length in Jones's History of the 
Church, and other standard works. 

From a confession of their faith, in .1120, we extract the 
following particulars : — " (1 ) That the Scriptures teach that 
there is one God, almighty, all-wise, and all-good, who made 
all things by his goodness ; for he formed Adam in his own 
image and likeness : but that by the envy of the devil sin 
entered into the world, and that we are sinners in and by 
Adam. (2.) That Christ was promised to our fathers, who 
received the law : that so, knowing by the law their unright- 
eousness and insufficiency, they might desire the coming of 
Christ, to satisfy for their sins, and accomplish the law by 
himself. (3.) That Christ was born in the time appointed 
by God the Father ; that is to say, in the time when all 
iniquity abounded, that he might show us grace and mercy, 
as being faithful. (4.) That Christ is our life, truth, peace, 
and righteousness ; as also our pastor, advocate, and priest, 
who died for the salvation of all who believe, and is risen for 
our justification. (5.) That there is no mediator and advo- 

52* 



618 



APPENDIX. 



cate with God the Father, save Jesus Christ. (6.) That 
after this Vfe there are only two places, the one for the saved 
and the other for the damned, (t.) That we ought to honor 
the secular powers bv subjection, ready obedience, and pay- 
ing of tribute." 

3. Their purity and exctllence of life and manners, — 
Though often accused of the most abominable crimes, the 
whole evidence goes to show that these accusations were vile 
calumnies, invented for party purposes by their malignant 
enemies, the papal priests. Indeed, an ancient inquisitor 
confesses that " these heretics are known by their manners 
and conversation, for they are orderly and modest in their • 
behaviour and deportment. They avoid all appearance of 
pride in their dress ; they neither indulge in finery, nor are 
they mean and ragged. They avoid commerce, that they may 

be free from deceit and falsehood. They get their livelihood 
by manual industry. They are not anxious about amassing 
riches, but content themselves with the necessaries of life. 
They are chaste, temperate, and sober. They abstain from 
anger. Even when they work, they either learn or teach, 
etc." Seisselius, archbishop of Turin, also admits, " Their 
heresy excepted, they generally live a purer life than other 
Christians." 

4. Their enlightened fervor, courage, and zeal. — Reineriua 
assigns as one cause of their great increase, their great zeal. 
" All of them, men and women, night and day, never cease from 
teaching -and learning. The first lesson," he adds, "which 
the Waldenses teach those whom they bring over to their 
party, is to instruct them what manner of persons the disci- 
ples of Christ ought to be ; and this they do by the doctrine 
of the evangelists and apostles, saying that those only are 
the followers of the apostles who imitate their manner of 
Lfe." Hence, 

6. Their steady opposition to all corruptions and antichris- 
Han usurpations. — " The first error of the Waldenses," says 
an ancient inquisitor, is, that they affirm that the Church ci 



APPENDIX. 



619 



Rome is not the church of Jesus Christ, but an assembly of 
ungodly men, and that she has ceased from being the true 
church from the time of Pope Sylvester, at which time the 
poison of temporal advantages was cast into the Church." 
They rejected images, crosses, relics, legends, traditions, 
uricular confession, indulgences, absolutions, clerical celibacy ; 
orders, titles, tithes, vestments, monkery, masses, and prayeia 
for the dead ; purgatory, invocation of saints, and of the 
Virgin Mary ; holy water, festivals, processions, pilgrimages, 
vigils, Lent ; pretended miracles, exorcisms, consecrations, 
confirmations, extreme unction, canonization, and the like. 
They condemned the use of liturgies, especially in an un- 
known tongue. They condemned the mystical or allegorical 
interpretations of Scripture. They condemned, most of all, 
the wicked lives of both people and clergy in the worldly 
communion of Rome. 

6. Their enlightened vieivs of liberty of conscience. — 
"They afi&rm," says the inquisitor, "that no man ought to 
be forcibly compelled in matters of faith." On this point, as 
also on the next, they are far in advance of tbe reformers, 
Luther and Calvin. 

Y. Their just ideas of the nature and character of a church 
of Christ. — "That is the Church of Christ which bears the 
pure doctrine of Christ, and observes the ordinances instituted 
by him, in whatever place it exists." " The sacraments of 
the Church of Christ are two, baptism and the Lord's Supper, 
and in the latter Christ has instituted the receiving in both 
kinds, both for priests and people." " We consider the sacra- 
ments as signs of holy things, or as the visible emblems of 
iavisible blessings. We regard it as proper, and «veij 
necessary, that believers use these symbols when it can be 
done. Notwithstanding which, we maintain that believers 
may be saved without these signs, when they have neither 
place nor opportunity of observing them." Hence Seisseli- 
us remarks, " They say that they alone observe the evangelic 
ac/' apostolic doctrine, on which account, by an intoleraWo 



620 



APPENDIX. 



impudence, thej usurp the name of tlie Catholic Church *' 
Keinerius also observes, " They declare themselves to be the 
apostles' successors, to have apostolical authority, and the 
keys of binding and loosing. They say that a man is then 
first baptized when he is received into their community : some 
of them hold that baptism is of no advantage to infants, be- 
cause they cannot actually believe." On the whole, it is evi» 
dent that they were, and that, too, on principle, dissenters, not 
from the Church of Rome only, but from all national established 
churches. Their church ofiBcers, Reinerius says, were bishops, 
elders, and deacons ; but the distinction between their bishops 
and other elders seems to have been only that the former 
were the official pastors of the churches. 

That they understood and practiced immersion as baptism 
is evident, but whether they generally practiced infant bap- 
tism has long been a matter of dispute. The words of 
Reinerius seem to imply that in his time (1250) they were 
of different opinions on this point. The modern Waldenses 
in the valleys of Piedmont do practise it ; but they have so 
changed in many points, since their amalgamation with the 
Calvinists at the Reformation, having also received their 
pastors from them since 1663, that nothing decisive can be 
hence inferred. Dr. Murdock thinks that the followers of 
Peter Waldo universally practised infant baptism ; but he 
gives us no authority for this opinion. The only one of their 
ancient writings which sanctions it is the Spiritual Calendar f 
but this, if genuine, is of doubtful date. On the contrary, all 
their other writings, from the Noble Lesson, in 1100, down 
to their Confession of Faith, in 1655, Dr. Gill affirms to be in 
favor of the baptism of believers only. It appears certain thai 
the Cathari, the Paterines, the Berengarians, the Arnoldists, 
Petrobrusians, and Henricians, i.e. the earlier Waldenses, as 
far as history testifies, vehemently opposed infant baptism. 
That there were, on the other hand, many among them in 
after years who adopted the practice, is, in view of all the 
facts, highly probable. Mr. Jones, in the preface to the fifth 



APP ENDIX. 



621 



edition of his history, says that " the Waldenses were Anti- 
pedobaptists. " Mr. Milner, after saying, "I cannot find any 
satisfactory proofs that the Waldenses were in judgment 
Anti-pedobaptists strictly," concludes thus : " I lay no great 
stress on the subject ; for the Waldenses might have been a 
faithful, humble, and spiritual people, as I believe they were, 
it they had differed from the general body of Christians on 
this article. See Anabaptists in this Appendix. 

However this point may be decided, it is now generally 
acknowledged that the Waldenses were the witnesses for the 
truth in the dark ages, and that they gave the first impulse 
to a reform of the whole Christian Church, so called. 

BAPTISTS. The Baptists in England, at this time, have 
a membership exceeding 200,000, with a population of about 
1,000,000. In 1T92, they began their famous India Mission 
— the pioneer of all Protestant Missions in the East, Of late 
years they have greatly prospered, and are now generally re 
garded as the most progressive body of Christians in England. 

The Baptists of the United States established, in 1814, a 
Missionary Union for Foreign Missions ; a Home Mission 
Society in 1832 ; an American and Foreign Bible Society in 
1838 ; a Bible Union for Revision in 1850, which, however, 
is not exclusively Baptist, being sustained by many of other 
denominations for the sake of a more exact version of tlie 
sacred text in the English tongue. It now employs the best 
scholars in the country in its work, without regard to denomi- 
nation. 

Besides the Home Mission Society, whose field is all North 
America, the Baptists have Conventions or General Associa- 
tions in every State for Domestic Missions, and Education 
Societies for the aid of licentiates preparing for the ministry 
in colleges and theological seminaries, of whom there are over 
1000. A Theological Institute for Freedmen was founded 
early in 1865, and has numerous branches. The receipts and 
e^«M^ diture for these various purposes the last year was 



622 



A P P E X D I X . 



aboul $500,000. If we add the sums expended in endow 
ments of seminaries of all grades, it will exceed $1,500,000. 
A liberal Baptist, of Poughkeepsie, Xew York, within five 
Tears has given nearly $500,000 for foonding a College for 
female edocation, where 400 young ladies are now under the 
tuiiion of accomplished Christian teachers. A single family, 
near Philadelphia, has given $50,000 this year as a Fund for 
the Freedmen, to be expended through the American Baptist 
Publication Society, an institution whose total receipts for the 
last year were over $173,000. The annual outlay on new 
church edifices exceeds $1,000,000. These facts and figures 
show a remarkable development of energy and enlightened 
liberality in this Christian denomination. 

CHHISTIAXITY : the religion of Jesus Christ, the Sod 
of God, as delineated in the sacred Scriptures. Its peculiar 
and characteristic feature is, that it reveals the only way of 
salvation for sinful men, through the incarnation and atoning 
death of a divine Redeemer, in which " the righteousness of 
God is manifest" in harmony with bis mercy, " that he might 
be just, and the justifier of him that believeth in Jesus.** 
(Rom. iii. 20, 21.) To this, the Holy Spirit sets his seal 

All the variety of forms in which Christianity appears in 
this book, may be reduced to two : namely. Evangelical 
Christianitt, which in the legitimate use of reason receives 
the religion of Christ as it is — a revealed method of salvation 
for sinners ; and Rationalistic Christianity, which, by an 
illegitimate use of reason, would exalt it as the ultimLte 
authority in regard to the matters revealed. (See Ration- 
alists, in this Appendix.) Rationalistic Christiantty 
again, appears under four distinct forms. 1. Philosophical, 
9^ in the Gnostics, Arians, etc. ; 2. Formal or Sacramental ; 
3. Hierarchical, and 4. Political. Examples of the three last 
divisions, which, indeed, are intimately allied, may be seen 
in the Roman and Greek Churches, and in the principal Church 
establishraents of modern Europe. All three are strongly 



APPENDIX. 



623 



porvaded also by the Traditional element ; the Rationalistic 
remodelling Christianity to suit its own ideas of what reh- 
gion ought to be, to fit it for the condition of the world, and 
the Traditional seeking to perpetuate the innovations thus in- 
troduced under the pretence of Conservatism. 

But the object of this article is not to develop these points, 
but to present some general views of the present condition 
and prospects of Christianity, as the one true religion, de- 
signed to subdue and supersede all others, and become, like 
the sun in the firmanent, the fixed light and life of men. And 
we cannot, perhaps, do this better than by some extracts 
from a distinguished French philosopher, M. Jouffroy, in 
his Essay On the Present State of Humanity. 

It must be remarked, that the writer here regards Budd- 
hism as but a form of Braminism, from which it originally 
proceeded. 

" We may regard the world as subject to the attraction of 
three different forms, or three systems of civilization : Chris- 
tianity, Braminism, and Mohammedanism. — A real religion 
is nothing but a complete solution of the great questions 
which interest humanity, that is to say, of the destiny of man, 
of his origin, of his future condition, of his relation to God and 
to his fellow-men. Nov? it is by virtue of the opinions which 
different nations profess on these questions, that they establish 
a mode of worship, a government and laws ; that they adopt 
certain manners, habits, and thoughts ; that they aspire to a 
certain order of things, which they regard as the ideal of the 
True, the Beautiful, the Right, and the Good, in this world. 
The true and radical difference between savage and civilized 
nations, consists in the fact that the former have only crude 
and vague ideas on the great questions which interest Hu- 
manity, so that these ideas could not be brought into a suffi- 
ciently precise form for the construction of a system. 

"If in any part of the earth there were a great mass of 
savage nations In contact, as there was in the north and in 
the centre of Asia, during the fourth century, we might admit 



624 



APPENDIX. 



the possibility that a system suddenly appearing in the 
bosom of this mass, could gather around it the people who 
composed it, and create a fourth civilization, a fourth centre 
of attraction. But such a mass does not exist. 

" We may then regard those three systems of civilization 
as the only systems which can exert an influence on the des- 
tinies of the world. To those systems, therefore, we must 
give our attention. What are their respective forces, the 
degrees of their vigor and attractive power ? 

Now it is proved by facts that the Christian civilization is 
the only one of the three which is endowed at the present day 
with an expansive power. It is in truth the only one which 
makes any progress at the expense of the others, and which 
gains savage tribes to civilization. 

" Braminism has few or no savages to civilize. Its do- 
minion extends to the eastern borders of Asia, and on the 
west it approaches Mohammedanism and Christianity. It is 
therefore in contact with the other systems of civilization. 
And as it forms no foreign colonies, it remains unknown to 
savages of other countries. It will accordingly have no share 
in the mass of men who are yet to be civilized. 

" Mohammedanism also forms no colonies ; like Braminism, 
it keeps at home ; the time when it subdued nations with the 
sword is past. Now, on the east toward Asia, on the north 
and on the west toward Europe, it is arrested by Braminism 
and Christian civilization. It comes in contact with savages 
only at the south, toward the centre of Africa. We know 
not whether it continues to extend in that direction, or whether 
the immense conquests which it formerly made are still in- 
creasing ; but we may affirm with certainty, that if it does con- 
tinue to make conquests among savage tribes, it is the mere 
result of contact, and not at all of design ; for in the present 
day we do not discern in Mohammedanism the slightest trace 
of the spirit of proselytism which it once possessed, and 
which is now so ardently cherished by Christian nations. 

*' If we now turn our eyes to Christianity, we perceive tha 



APPENDIX. 



G2o 



with the exception of the barbarians of Africa — and even 
these it is on the point of disputing with Mohammedanism — 
It holds in its hand all the savages of the rest of the world. 
There is hardly an island of any magnitude where it has not 
taken a station on its coast, and visited with its ships ; and 
by degrees the population of every island of the ocean will 
fall under its system.. By holding the coast of ^N'ew Holland 
(Australia) it surrounds with a thread which they cannot 
escape from, all the tribes of the fifth world — tribes the most 
barbarous which have yet been discovered. It will follow 
the same course there which it has followed in America. 

" If we consider the conquests over one another which are 
made, or should be made by the three systems, we find new 
proof of the expansive power which is possessed exclusively 
by Christian civilization. Neither Braminism nor Moham- 
medanism penetrates, or attempts to penetrate, into Chris- 
tian possessions. Christianity and its civilization everywhere 
advance with ardor, and with deliberate purpose, into the 
domains of Brama and of Mohammed. They openly meditate 
their conquest. The Bible and Missionary Societies are in- 
stituted for this express purpose. But there are two levers of 
Btill greater power in operation, to detach ancient Asia from 
its ancient doctrines. These levers are Russia and England. 
While Russia acts upon Asia on the north, from the Ural 
mountains to the extremity of Kamschatka, and opens a large 
third of this vast country to our civilization, England invades 
it in the south, and causes our power to penetrate into the 
very centre of Braminism. 

" Now this superiority of power is a new circumstance, 
which appears to give Christianity brighter and brightei 
promise of the conquest of the world. 

" The Christian system is making progress, and rapid pro- 
gress, while the other two are decaying: the nations which 
compose it are every day becoming more united, and growing 
into a powerful aggregate which nothing on earth is able to 
renist It is impossible for the Christian system to ho ab 
53 2 r 



626 



APPENDIX. 



sorbed in either of the others ; on the contrary, it is begin- 
ning to absorb them both, or at least, to reduce the territory 
which they occupy; and there is every reason to believe 
that these conquests will soon go on with increased rapidity. 
We cannot then avoid the conclusion, that if the ChristiaD 
ijystem of civilization be not destroyed by internal defect, it 
is destined to gain possession of the earth. Its future condi- 
tion involves the future condition of the world." 

The argument of M. Jouffroy, a mere outline of which we 
have given, seems perfectly satisfactory as to the general fact, 
that Christianity in some form will gain dominion of the 
world. But it may be asked, as a distinct question. In what 
form will it prevail ? Will it be Evangelical or nationalistic ? 
We use these terms in the sense already defined in the be- 
ginning of this article. Now the same line oi argument 
pursued by M. Jouffroy, may be adopted to answer this latter 
question, and we think with great success. The following 
remarks of Isaac Taylor, in his ^'Natural History of Enthusi 
asm,^^ will show this : 

" If we are to calculate the probable extension or extinction 
of certain opinions, we must consult the evidence of facts on 
a large scale, and especially must observe what manifesta- 
tions of intrinsic power they have given us on certain peculiar 
and critical occasions. This is the only course that can be 
deemed satisfactory, or that is conformed to the procedures 
of modern science. 

" The early triumphs of the Gospel over the fascinating idol- 
atries and the astute atheism of Greece and Rome, has been 
often insisted upon (and conclusively) as evidence of its truth. 
With that argument we have nothing now to do ; yet if the 
subject were not such a very hackneyed one, it might well be 
brought forward in all its details in proof of a very different 
point — the innate power of the religion of the Bible to van- 
quish the hearts of men. 

"But if there were room to imagine that the first spread of 
Christianity was owing rather to an accidental conjuncture 



APPENDIX. 



627 



of favoring circumstances than to its real power over the 
human mind, or if it might be thought that any such peculiar 
virtue was all spent and exhausted in the first expansive 
effort, then it is natural to look to the next occasion on which 
the opinions of mankind were put in fermentation, and to 
watch in what manner the system of the Bible then rode over 
the high billows of political, religious, and intellectual com- 
motion. It was a fair trial for Christianity, and a trial essen- 
tially different from its first, when, in the fifteenth century, 
after having been corrupted in every part to a state of 
loathsome ulceration, it had to contend for existence, and to 
work its own renovation, at the moment of the most extraor- 
dinary expansion of the human intellect that has ever hap- 
pened. . . . 

"At such a time, which seemed to leave no chance for con- 
rinued existence to aught that was not in its nature vigorous, 
might it not have confidently said, This must be the crisis of 
Christianity ? if it be not inwardly sound, if it has not a true 
hold of human nature, if it be a thing of feebleness and dotage, 
fit only for cells and cowls and the precincts of spiritual 
despotism ; if it be not adapted to the world of action, if it 
have not sympathy with the feelings of men — of freemen, 
nothing can save it : no power of princes, no devices of priests, 
will avail to rear it anew and replace it in the veneration of 
the people : at least not in any country where has been felt 
the freshening gale of intellectual life. The result of this crisis 
need not be narrated. . . . 

" Whether the religion for which the Reformers suffered was 
from heaven, or of men,' is not our question ; but whether 
it is not a religion of robust constitution, framed to endure 
and to spread, and to vanquish the hearts of men ? With 
the history of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries in view, it 
hi asked if Christianity be a system that must always lean 
tipon ignorance and craft and despotism, and which, when 
these rotten stays are removed, must fall and be seen no move ? 

*' Yet another species of trial was in store to give proof of 



628 



A P P E X P I X . 



the indestructibility and victorious powei of Christianity. I\ 
remained to be seen whether, when the agitations, political 
and moral, that were subsequent upon the great schism which 
had taken place in Europe, had subsided, and when the season 
of slumber and exhaustion came on, and when human reason, 
strengthened and refined hj physical science and elegant 
literature, should awake fully to the consciousness of its 
powers J whether then the religion of the Bible could retain 
its hold of the nations, or at least those of them that enjoyed, 
without limit, the happy influences of political liberty and in- 
tellectual light. This was a sort of probation which Christi- 
anity had never before passed through. . . . 

" It is difficult to imagine a single advantage that was lacking 
to the promoters of infidelity, or a single circumstance of periJ 
or ill-omen that was not present to deepen the gloom of the 
friends of religion. The actual issue of that signal crisis is 
before our eyes in the freshness of a recent event. Christian- 
ity — we need not ask whether for the benefit or the injury of 
the world — has triumphed ; the mere fact is all that concerns 
our argument." 

Once more : '* The spread of the English stock and language 
and literature over the Xorth American Continent, is a signi- 
ficant indication of the power of Christianity to retain its hold 
of the mind, and of its aptness to go hand in hand with 
civilization, even when unaided by those secular succors, to 
which its enemies in malice, and some of its friends in over- 
caution, are prone to attribute too much importance. The 
tendency of republicanism, and the connection of the colonies 
at the moment of their revolt (from the mother country) with 
France, and the prevalence of a peculiarly eager and uncor 
retted commercial temper, and the absence of every sort and 
semblance of restraint upon opinion, were concurrent circum- 
fettinces belonging to the infancy of the American Union, of a 
kind which put to the severest test the intrinsic power of 
Christianity in retaining its hold of the human mind. Could 
infidel experimenters have wished for conditions more equiu* 



APPENDIX 



629 



hie, under which to try the respective forces of the opposing 
systems ? And what has been the issue ? Christianity has 
gained rather than lost ground, and shows itself in a style of 
as much fervor and zeal as in England ; and perhaps it has 
won the advantage in these respects. Wherever on that con 
tinent good order and intelligence are spreading, there alst 
the religion of the Bible spreads." 

It has, then, been proved that nothing inseparable from 
human nature, nothing invincible, stands in the way of the 
diffusion of our evangelical faith among either polished or 
barbarous nations, for already it has been victorious in both 
kinds. " Let it be affirmed that the religious infatuations of 
mankind are firm as adamant ; still it is a fact that a hammer 
harder than adamant once shattered the rock to atoms. And 
now, when it is proposed to smite the same substance with 
the same instrument, are those to be deemed irrational who 
anticipate the same success ?" 

There was a greater disproportion (as Mr. Douglas ob- 
serves) between the resources of the first Christians and their 
success in changing the moral condition of the Roman empire, 
than there is at present between the means which Christiana 
now possess and the universal conversion of the world. True 
benevolence will come in the train of genuine Christianity, 
and mankind, in promoting the welfare of each other, wil) 
find that happiness which has long" escaped them. Then will 
be the harvest of the moral world ; and the seed of noble 
thoughts and deeds that once seemed lost, shall suddenly 
shoot forth and ripen to maturity, and the success of wrong, 
even in this world, shall seem brief compared with the long 
a^es that shall crown the efforts of wisdom and virtue.' 

63* 



« X " 



0' 



-0' 



1 'P V 



. „ V K^-' ^-"^^^ 



o 0' 



o 0' 



0' 



% 



1/^ 



.0- 



O 



.0^ 



9 \ "* 



,0o. 



